I do not believe in god and I am pro-life. But in a much different way than creationist, I do not believe that life ends when it exits the womb. Anti war and pro- life yet I am atheist- go figure.
I don't understand her preoccupation with the illustrations in text books. She seems to say that drawings aren't enough, so I guess the publishers should distribute little replicas of fossils in every book. But then replicas probably aren't enough either. So then we need to make sure that every high school student in America gets a free fossil with their text books. Then once they've lost or destroyed them, we really won't have material evidence!
Wright: You know what I'm saying. Dawkins: I know what you saying. Wright: You know what I'm saying. Dawkins: I know what you saying. Wright: You know what I'm saying. Dawkins: I know what you saying. Wright: You know what I'm saying. Dawkins: I know what you saying. Wright: You know what I'm saying. Dawkins: I know what you saying. Wright: You know what I'm saying. DAWKINS: STFU slut. (That what he should said to her)
She's right. Why don't we apply that logic in other areas of life? Like in court proceedings. Instead of just presenting the judge & jury with verified witnesses and tested, liable evidenced, we should also present them with witnesses who we know were false, or DNA that we know have been tampered with. The people deserve to know both the real and fake information, not just information that is pertinent to the case or information that were tested and verified.
never talk about a complex subject with people whos eyes meet in the center and have blond fucking hair... NO ONE CAN PROVE OF A BIO ENGINEERED HUMAN... even if that was the case you still could not prove the said event FFS!!!
I don't understand how could this b a 10 part series cuz u've nailed her. 1st vid. now she's just repeating herself and it seems like sayin the same things over & over again
I was born a Christian (my mom), going to church from baby to late teens but I always questioned and I learned, I refused ignorance and let new knowledge in.
@LegionIscariot took me till I was 27. it was a gradual process 2 go from hardcore creatard 2 neutral non-church goin christian when I was 24 or so, then I became spiritual pagan for 2 years to agnostic to atheist in 3 weeks time. like the graph of x squared it just bam, shot up in cognitive thinking :)
that would be a perfect time to ask for her evidence..ok we've talked about tons of our evidence,what do they have? a rainbow, no wait we got that to. a rainbow isn't from god it's just light reflecting off water.
@MrTattooConnection exactly. come up with a phenomenon and we can explain it. we havn't been able 2 explain the exact circumstances of the initial replecating DNA or what brought the mass 2gether of the big bang or if it just always was but other then that, we've explained the happenings of all of the universe. the point of lack of belief of god is saying if I don't know the answer I'm going 2 follow the evidence there. there is no room 4 god because he never shows up. anywhere. period.
OH MY FUCKING GOODNESS!!!!!!!! AHHHHH!!!! I CANT TAKE THIS ANYMORE!!! Her ignorance is actually causing me physical pain! I really want to finish the videos but it hurts too much. And mr. c0ct0pus, don't insult the 12 and 13 year olds by saying that they have the same mindset as this dumb bimbo. They say GOD doesnt make mistakes but this dumb ass bitch is a perfect example that he does.
just a couple of things.... first... the lady did have a point that evolution should not be the only thing taught in school, because there is scientific evidence for it, however im not argueing the fact that she was retarded....second... hitler kinda killed a whole bunch of people trying to develope his own race, which kinda sounds alot like encouraging natural selection by taking out inferior races.... and lastly santa is real dumbass.... im a christian, but other then those few things good vid
She is being utilitaristic! Last video she said she was NOT in support of utilitarism but now she seems in favor of banning a scientific fact based on her interpretation of what the facts may lead to in social relations (social darwinism). That is clearly a utilitaristic stance. "If we stop believing in evolution and cling to our "loving god" we will ultimately be better human beings". Im not holding anything against utilitarism per se, but this woman is just FAIL
No one is trying to censor how stupid she is acting. She is beyond denial. So, does she think that the US army, in Afghanistan, at war right now an army of atheists? And how about the people that sent them there, were they atheists? And how about the people that flew the planes into the buildings, were they atheists? How about our government, are they all atheists?
No one is trying to censor how stupid she is acting. Beyond denial. So, does she think that the US army, in Afghanistan, at war right now an army of atheists? And how about the people that sent them there, were they atheists?
Holy shit is this hard to watch, to no fault of your own C0ct0pus.
Do religious people see this chick speak like she does and argue like she does, and still wonder why we have our frustration with people who believe the bullshit she spews?
When proven wrong and given what she wanted as evidence, like fossils she then goes "Well it still doesn't prove anything" really?
Proof isn't proof?
Fucking HELL, she is the most annoying thing on this planet.
dude that remarke you made about jessus is my co piolit was funny. i got another one. jessus is my wingman :P and anyways that is one stupid bitch. and this is why you cant debate a cerationist and why he refuses to do that bc it goes in one ear and out the other.
Listing to this woman is like listening to a broken record play the same C minor note in the second over and over for the next 4 hours. It's repetitive, and stupid.
Evolution vs Creationism is such a hot matter in the USA. Here in Bulgaria, the majority of the people are atheists and I am yet to meet the person that doesn't accept evolution. Hell, even old people accept it.
If that incestuous cunt was willing to apply the same "scientific" standard to the holy bable, it woundn't even quailfy as a "theory". It's a baseless hypothesis that merits about the same serious consideration as "Jack & the bean stock".
Wait just a fucking minute. So at the begininning she claims that there is no evidence and continually asks to see some, and then around the 7:00 mark she says that the evidence she either says doesn't exist or wants to see has already been forced upon her by aggressive evolutionists?
Seriously, this dumb bitch is like a broken record player repeating the same thing every time she's cornered. At this point, I would have clocked her across the face with a Homo habilis' skull.
You say to rate if I KNOW wendy is a moron... While my scientific skepticism tells me not to rush to conclusions without further research, the evidence is overwhelming.
Dude, the so called information they believe we are trying to censor is called 'intelligent design'. seriously! these retards believe that science lessons should make room for the 'god-did-it' hypothesys!
I could never have a discussion like that. This is one of the reasons why I have such massive respect for Professor Dawkins. Only Jebus himself could have that patience...
FUCKING hell you know what never ceases to amaze me? the double standards, the outright hypocrisy and blatant disregard for legitimate evidence displayed by this woman and most of her fellow creationists. I honestly don't know how a man like Richard Dawkins can put up with it and be so polite and accommodating to her like he is. For that matter I don't know how you, C0c Prime, can put up with it to put together vids like this. I thank you both for your efforts though.
Why would a man with this level of intelligence waste his time on a interview like this? We all no as atheist that it is impossible to get through to people like this.
i love this because Dawkins is just so fucking frustrated with this bitch u can see he just wants to fucking beat her ass to death but he's just too good of a person to really go off on her
Wow, Dawkins has an AMAZING amount of self control. I think I would have unconsciously wrapped my hands around her neck and squeezed before the end of the first part. Though, honestly the sad part is that she pretty much used ALL of the arguments that creationists actually have anyway.
Evolution led to ideologies that are distracting the human race? What about the Spanish Inquisition who essentially tortured and killed anyone who didn't believe in the exact same things that the church did. Or the Crusades the were responsible for the genocide of thousands upon thousands of innocent Muslim people. And now you, who is distracting the focus of scientists (i.e. people of some value to the world, which you are not). Hypocrisy sure is a bitch.
Dawkins mentioned this part of the interview pretty much word for word in "The Greatest Show On Earth".....Seeing her say this bullshit with a fixed grin on her face is so much more infuriating than reading the transcript.
Her stubborness to ignore another argument, without trying to understand any part of it, shows a willful ignorance and a great fear on her part. At least Dawkins has listened to the creationist argument and the evidence (?) to support it.
That retard acuses scientists of *attacking and being agressive* towards her infuriating stupidity, but when Dawkins calmly explains something to her she starts to laugh insencerely and ostentasiously only to mock him.
I TRULY admire Dawkins now. If it were me there, talking to that grimming moron I would have thrown her through the window straight off.
*Ahahahaha, evidence! Drawings, ahahahah.* what a dumb fuck. Someone needs to lock her in a room and shove fossils up her ignorant ass.
I like how she keeps asking how dangerous it is... Hint - because people as her are historically ones that enjoy book burnings, people burnings and other such wholesome god fearin' activities.
The annoyance I felt seeing her dumb expression while talking to a brilliant man @ 8:41 convinced me that it's time to bring back the "bruning people alive at the stake" tradition. This time the "god-haters" will do the burning. Fuck humanism in her case.
If you've ever attended a private school that pulls that evangelical creationsim crap in the science classrooms, you know full well that THEY are the ones who censor out the evidence and resort to emtional statements trying to claim this is all about "respecting human life". My ass, they just can't handle life without their precious "god" friend making everything for them exactly the way their unopen, simplistic minds see things. I know all too well of this first hand.
On one hand we have a theory of evolution backed up by 200 years of scientific research and over 200,000 scientific peer reviewed papers that says that humans evolved from slime (I think she means primordial soup) ...
while on the other hand we have a proposition that 'an invisible man created man out of mud and his wife out of his rib, who then insestiously populated the world' that is backed up by the dereanged writtings of uneducated bronse age dessert dwellers and no evidence ...
When she says "in the museums that I've been to many times", watch her body language, she giggles nervously, her head turns away, then she shuts her eyes, then she looks down as she completes the sentence and then blinks a few times too. Anyone that knows the tiniest thing about body language can see that this is a blatant lie.
"why is it so important to you, that everyone believe like you believe?" such a stupid question when its on the topic of evolution. Like Dawkins said he is talking about FACTS! Thats like him presenting facts that we are in a heliocentric solar system and her saying "why is it so important to you, that everyone believe like you believe?"
its because these are facts and you'd be stupid not to believe it.
Did this bitch just say "eugenisis"? That's not even a word.
I keep waiting for a baseball bat to come out of the side of the screen to bash her teeth out every time she flashes that condescending-but-oblivious smile.
Typical of the folks who want evidence and ignore it when presented. They want to see a monkey give birth to a man right on the spot. If their "God" came down and said to them "This is how I did it... with Evolution of Species by means of Natural Selection.", they'd deny he was their "God".
I LOVE that at a point, RD has to resort to the argument 'no it doesn't' Because you can't argue against fact. This...evidence...yada..yada..yada.. nope... *ears in head* yada..yada..yada..
It's amazing... A sort of... Wow the stupid! it burns!
Sorry if this seems a bit silly but if some people get these videos blocked based on their location the don't have access the the description either so they can't see the megaupload link either. It might be a better idea to put the links on your channel or in a separate video.
@PhoenixFirewolf TOTALLY! I keep thinking of that scene in Galaxy Quest when Sarris says "He doesn't understand. Explain as you would a child." She just seems to be CLUTCHING at her belief of her sacred text. Does she also believe the earth is flat?
"I've seen the evidence, and I'm not convinced." Well, fuck, I guess that settles that. Evolution is wrong because you ignore the evidence. Oh, and dredging up these fossils is "aggressively" denouncing their position.
Carbon dating is censored. It only goes back 6000 years, which in actuality is exactly why evolution has not held any fact. especially when you cant use a monkey heart for transplant. So the probability of evolution is likely, yet we have been lied to about a monkey theory when our DNA is closer to pigs & frogs. So if they werent saturating it with lies for there own agenda, then maybe we can start to look at serious zirkonian dating that proves 1 million years of being upright.
@LendMeYourHand Carbon dating is reliable up to about 60 000 years. Other means of dating can go back much further (as in billions of years), but are less precise.
"So the probability of evolution is likely" Yes, it has been observed. It's 100% likely.
"yet we have been lied to about a monkey theory when our DNA is closer to pigs & frogs" Not according to those that have actually had a look at it. What's your source? And the reason we can't use monkey hearts is size-related.
@Martymer81 it is very evident of an agenda when we claim the validity behind carbon-14 dating. The evidence is only to support those who are lost in paradigm. The falsification of past records would have to be re dated to uncover there actual period in time. Nothing about 14C is valid when we have an ever changing environment that has spanned fossil fuels & nuclear technologies.
@LendMeYourHand "it is very evident of an agenda when we claim the validity behind carbon-14 dating. "
Seriously, what claim are you making? If you know of some hidden agenda, can't you at least tell us what that agenda is???
"The evidence is only to support those who are lost in paradigm." Oh, that answers it. Sorry. They want to keep people believing C14-dating works because they want people to believe it works. You know... I think that's what they call a circular argument...
@Martymer81 if you could only understand 221 unnamed DNA strands classified as junk DNA & how this builds a misconception in relation to percentages that hold us to a monkey evolution. In this same sense, we hold 80% dog, this does not justify the probability that any of these unidentified strands can be turned on & off to create gills or wings, which might i add ARE in all humans. What do you think tonsils are??? Gills.... So our amphibian qualities are very evident.
@LendMeYourHand: The mistake is the label "junk DNA". That's pure ignorance. All it really means is "DNA that may or may not do something at some point in time that I have not clue one about." - a lot of the so-called "junk" has been found to have a purpose in development. It's akin to the same silly notion that we only use 10% of our brains. The proper response to which is "At what point in time and under what situations?"
@LendMeYourHand I never said we weren't related to amphibians. We are. But you said we are closer to pigs and amphibians than to monkeys. Monkeys and humans are both primates. Pigs and dogs, like primates, are mammals. So yes, we're related to pigs and dogs, but not as closely as to monkeys. Mammals, like amphibians, are vertebrates. There's the connection between humans and frogs. This is elementary school biology! Seriously! As for junk DNA, see RyuDarragh's comment.
What? I have for for part 4? Wow.. this woman is crazy. She was going on about same-sex marriage on TV the other day with the same shit-eating grin and hollow eyes.
This is probably why I can't argue atheism, the second time she asked for evidence I would have started calling her retarded. Dawkins has the patience of a God.
Where will you go to when you die? Have you ever told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain, or looked at someone with lust? If yes, then you are a lying, theiving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. When you die & stand before God you'll be guilty of breaking His law. The bible says you'll end up in Hell! So God sent God His Son Jesus to die for your sins, & He rose from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus died for your sins & was resurrected) you'll be saved!
I'm blown away that this woman is in a position of relative power. What a moron. Can't describe my anger at this ridiculous excuse of an interview. Mr. Dawkins I give you full marks for infinite patience
haha more to the point if some1 has a throrey and evidence that would disprove evolution then they would make a fortune.... I can see invites to Stockholm. lol.
you just have to understand you are talking to people that have had theology drilled into them since they could understand the language. they are nothing but products of their environment and untill they can see it that is they ever will be.
Phony, intellectually dishonest cunt. You know that she is just trying to antagonize Dawkins to get him so frustrated that he "loses it". So she can turn point and say "see...all that aggression, if you truly believed in evolution" blah blah blah. I gotta say that he handled himself better then I ever could have.
I can't finish watching this, it hurts too much.
MsHyde1 1 week ago
12:43 Dawkins mentally slapping the bitch
dragonman5459 1 week ago
I do not believe in god and I am pro-life. But in a much different way than creationist, I do not believe that life ends when it exits the womb. Anti war and pro- life yet I am atheist- go figure.
psychicpriest 4 weeks ago
I don't understand her preoccupation with the illustrations in text books. She seems to say that drawings aren't enough, so I guess the publishers should distribute little replicas of fossils in every book. But then replicas probably aren't enough either. So then we need to make sure that every high school student in America gets a free fossil with their text books. Then once they've lost or destroyed them, we really won't have material evidence!
venturieffect 1 month ago
aniolek355 4 months ago
If she wants to go back she should go back to the kitchen. Sorry, I couldn't resist lol.
brongarago 5 months ago in playlist More videos from C0ct0pusPrime
Wendy: "I've been to the museum several times."
The bathroom and snack bar don't count.
MetalMario03 5 months ago in playlist More videos from C0ct0pusPrime
She's right. Why don't we apply that logic in other areas of life? Like in court proceedings. Instead of just presenting the judge & jury with verified witnesses and tested, liable evidenced, we should also present them with witnesses who we know were false, or DNA that we know have been tampered with. The people deserve to know both the real and fake information, not just information that is pertinent to the case or information that were tested and verified.
SuperSeaweedSoup 6 months ago
Man, this is like re-watching a discussion between me an my church pastor.
They're too unwilling to admit they haven't taken the time to TRY and understand it. Because it intimidates them.
iloveyertle 7 months ago
At (04:30)
Insert here the Schmoyoho clip 'backin' up' song.
Domzdream 7 months ago
never talk about a complex subject with people whos eyes meet in the center and have blond fucking hair... NO ONE CAN PROVE OF A BIO ENGINEERED HUMAN... even if that was the case you still could not prove the said event FFS!!!
jammapcb 9 months ago
I don't understand how could this b a 10 part series cuz u've nailed her. 1st vid. now she's just repeating herself and it seems like sayin the same things over & over again
cruelbusiness1984 9 months ago
looking at this bitch makes me think of a song
the bird is the word
coltsrule5150 9 months ago
Comment removed
DastardlyDereK 10 months ago
I'm still trying to figure out if she's cross-eyed...
LuvStruckMess 10 months ago
@LuvStruckMess
nah, she's just religious, don't worry about that. They tend to have that caccuous, slightly out of alignment- look.
Domzdream 7 months ago
She wants to see slime people?... Someone grab the monster girl folder
HappyPariah 11 months ago
I guess she thinks she keeps saying "there is no evidence" over and over, that will make it true.
MorbidMira 11 months ago
I was born a Christian (my mom), going to church from baby to late teens but I always questioned and I learned, I refused ignorance and let new knowledge in.
Today I am an Atheist.
LegionIscariot 11 months ago 3
@LegionIscariot took me till I was 27. it was a gradual process 2 go from hardcore creatard 2 neutral non-church goin christian when I was 24 or so, then I became spiritual pagan for 2 years to agnostic to atheist in 3 weeks time. like the graph of x squared it just bam, shot up in cognitive thinking :)
cruelbusiness1984 9 months ago
Comment removed
LegionIscariot 11 months ago
This video could be summed up as: Dawkins - 'Here is the evidence' Wright - 'there is no evidence' Repeated endlessly.
continuum38 1 year ago
that would be a perfect time to ask for her evidence..ok we've talked about tons of our evidence,what do they have? a rainbow, no wait we got that to. a rainbow isn't from god it's just light reflecting off water.
MrTattooConnection 1 year ago
@MrTattooConnection exactly. come up with a phenomenon and we can explain it. we havn't been able 2 explain the exact circumstances of the initial replecating DNA or what brought the mass 2gether of the big bang or if it just always was but other then that, we've explained the happenings of all of the universe. the point of lack of belief of god is saying if I don't know the answer I'm going 2 follow the evidence there. there is no room 4 god because he never shows up. anywhere. period.
cruelbusiness1984 9 months ago
@cruelbusiness1984 there is no room 4 god because he never shows up. anywhere. period.--- two thumbs up for that part
MrTattooConnection 9 months ago
OH MY FUCKING GOODNESS!!!!!!!! AHHHHH!!!! I CANT TAKE THIS ANYMORE!!! Her ignorance is actually causing me physical pain! I really want to finish the videos but it hurts too much. And mr. c0ct0pus, don't insult the 12 and 13 year olds by saying that they have the same mindset as this dumb bimbo. They say GOD doesnt make mistakes but this dumb ass bitch is a perfect example that he does.
TheYaoiLover01 1 year ago
ding ding ding fuckin ding X'D
9CrystalDragon2 1 year ago
just a couple of things.... first... the lady did have a point that evolution should not be the only thing taught in school, because there is scientific evidence for it, however im not argueing the fact that she was retarded....second... hitler kinda killed a whole bunch of people trying to develope his own race, which kinda sounds alot like encouraging natural selection by taking out inferior races.... and lastly santa is real dumbass.... im a christian, but other then those few things good vid
riverguy4 1 year ago
She is being utilitaristic! Last video she said she was NOT in support of utilitarism but now she seems in favor of banning a scientific fact based on her interpretation of what the facts may lead to in social relations (social darwinism). That is clearly a utilitaristic stance. "If we stop believing in evolution and cling to our "loving god" we will ultimately be better human beings". Im not holding anything against utilitarism per se, but this woman is just FAIL
DimmDevil 1 year ago
No one is trying to censor how stupid she is acting. She is beyond denial. So, does she think that the US army, in Afghanistan, at war right now an army of atheists? And how about the people that sent them there, were they atheists? And how about the people that flew the planes into the buildings, were they atheists? How about our government, are they all atheists?
rich2rock 1 year ago
No one is trying to censor how stupid she is acting. Beyond denial. So, does she think that the US army, in Afghanistan, at war right now an army of atheists? And how about the people that sent them there, were they atheists?
rich2rock 1 year ago
i thank you, mr. coctopus, you are a genius
fcpictures 1 year ago 2
Holy shit is this hard to watch, to no fault of your own C0ct0pus.
Do religious people see this chick speak like she does and argue like she does, and still wonder why we have our frustration with people who believe the bullshit she spews?
When proven wrong and given what she wanted as evidence, like fossils she then goes "Well it still doesn't prove anything" really?
Proof isn't proof?
Fucking HELL, she is the most annoying thing on this planet.
Kill it with fire!
Shonem 1 year ago
@Shonem
Just saw her last comment at the end of the video.....what a lying bitch.
And still, that retarded smile on her face like she just trapped Houdini in a box and he can't escape.
And we are the arrogant ones?
Shonem 1 year ago
Someone should remix her "let me go back to..." like scratch DJ style.
TekLok 1 year ago
Comment removed
makka432 1 year ago
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArrrrghhh the fact this bitch was ever born disproves evolution by natural selection
TrancedNRG 1 year ago 2
Just facepalmed my glasses
TrancedNRG 1 year ago
@TrancedNRG that shit hurts
FnBigIndian 1 year ago
I admire Dawkins patience
clonatul1 1 year ago
I also love how she was saying she wants ALL humans to be treated with respect, when her group (CWA) are thoroughly AGAINST homosexuality!?
LucyInk121 1 year ago
Flamethrower is the best way to talk with this kind of people. Set them on fire and wait for god to save them.
666Rudy666 1 year ago
dude that remarke you made about jessus is my co piolit was funny. i got another one. jessus is my wingman :P and anyways that is one stupid bitch. and this is why you cant debate a cerationist and why he refuses to do that bc it goes in one ear and out the other.
TonPappa 1 year ago
"and eugenesis..." WTF???????????
She is either very literally???
a) stupid
b) knows what she is saying is wrong (lying)
c) has a mental disorder
d) all of the above
SanRafaelSwell 1 year ago
So this chick is Sara Palin, just with dyed hair? Right?
Testifyexe 1 year ago
Listing to this woman is like listening to a broken record play the same C minor note in the second over and over for the next 4 hours. It's repetitive, and stupid.
SilentGipsyQueen 1 year ago
she should go to an archeological dig, maybe she'll find a fossil for herself.
FletchRDG 1 year ago
Evolution vs Creationism is such a hot matter in the USA. Here in Bulgaria, the majority of the people are atheists and I am yet to meet the person that doesn't accept evolution. Hell, even old people accept it.
dgdbg 1 year ago 12
@In Bulgaria? Wow fuck I hardly even know about that country and it alreayd sounds good
SCRulerShinoda 1 year ago
If that incestuous cunt was willing to apply the same "scientific" standard to the holy bable, it woundn't even quailfy as a "theory". It's a baseless hypothesis that merits about the same serious consideration as "Jack & the bean stock".
atheistrage 1 year ago
Wait just a fucking minute. So at the begininning she claims that there is no evidence and continually asks to see some, and then around the 7:00 mark she says that the evidence she either says doesn't exist or wants to see has already been forced upon her by aggressive evolutionists?
BeekersSqueakers 1 year ago
Seriously, this dumb bitch is like a broken record player repeating the same thing every time she's cornered. At this point, I would have clocked her across the face with a Homo habilis' skull.
nylonhead116 1 year ago 2
@nylonhead116 Yeah, I don't think she has evolved much past slim herself.
atheistrage 1 year ago
Why did you have to smile like that! I'm going to have nightmears about that!
DragonGreenFire 1 year ago
She makes Forrest Gump look like a genius!!! And he has a great personality too, unlike this automaton wendy whatever LOL
Sexycosy 1 year ago
"GO GOD!" LoL
OoMASEoO 1 year ago
13:37 Evolution Akbar!!
AGNOSTICEXTREME 1 year ago
When she laughs, I want to tear something apart. that's how frustrating this is.
SCRulerShinoda 1 year ago 2
"Have you seen homo erectus?" "No, I don't look at erections."
BadScienceForFools 1 year ago 3
what do you wanna bet this woman's never been to museum..?
rktech68fl 1 year ago
If she wants evidence for a half slime half human being she should look in the mirror.
mumubear123 1 year ago 35
@mumubear123 I'd say it's more like 9/10 slime, 1/10 human being.
nylonhead116 1 year ago
@mumubear123 You owe me a new keyboard, kiddo. I just spewed my coffee everywhere laughing at what you just said. <3
Jujubunnie 1 year ago
Hahaha did you come up with the Santa Claus changing the video tape thing? That was hilarious.
Sabohaque 1 year ago
omg T_T good job tolerating this shit. keep them coming.
lolhowdoishotweblol 1 year ago
He should ask her if she takes it in the ass just to see her response!
xOmumblesOx 1 year ago
@xOmumblesOx im sure it would involve the words "but let me go back to"
Darkkat255 1 year ago
@Darkkat255 I'm sure it would! LOL!
xOmumblesOx 1 year ago
You say to rate if I KNOW wendy is a moron... While my scientific skepticism tells me not to rush to conclusions without further research, the evidence is overwhelming.
DrZilty 1 year ago
@DrZilty lol pwned with science terminology
yourwrong1000 1 year ago
Dude, the so called information they believe we are trying to censor is called 'intelligent design'. seriously! these retards believe that science lessons should make room for the 'god-did-it' hypothesys!
h6hfelie 1 year ago
This woman reminds me of my mum... Such ignorant and demonizing are very few people, and only in religion this can be a "virtue".
mardastheEitheist 1 year ago
I could never have a discussion like that. This is one of the reasons why I have such massive respect for Professor Dawkins. Only Jebus himself could have that patience...
ColdRoland 1 year ago
dude FUCK religious bigots
swimminglikeaquaman 1 year ago
13.45 LOL, In the name of evolution I would strike that bitch down, Dawkins has some serious self control right there
bonoboe 1 year ago
RD had incredible self control
bonoboe 1 year ago
Jesus nailoed to a fuckin stick I hate how richard gives this dipship hoe a level speaking ground *facepalm of death*
MajorDestruction 1 year ago
You can tell at the beginning that Dawkins is starting to lose it.
UR55378008 1 year ago
We have observed speciation both in the lab, and in nature...many, many times. I don't know why he doesn't start sighting examples.
mhoytus 1 year ago
Look up "Cletus take the reel" for a good laugh parody about "Jesus take the wheel".
MegF142857 1 year ago
Does anyone else see a HUGE amount of "sarah palin" within this bitch?
MansonFreak 1 year ago
looks like 3 creationists didn't like this video
MansonFreak 1 year ago
FUCKING hell you know what never ceases to amaze me? the double standards, the outright hypocrisy and blatant disregard for legitimate evidence displayed by this woman and most of her fellow creationists. I honestly don't know how a man like Richard Dawkins can put up with it and be so polite and accommodating to her like he is. For that matter I don't know how you, C0c Prime, can put up with it to put together vids like this. I thank you both for your efforts though.
D119heavy 1 year ago
Why would a man with this level of intelligence waste his time on a interview like this? We all no as atheist that it is impossible to get through to people like this.
shaggzm4 1 year ago
yes Dawkins seems very agressive
EnergizerBunny804 1 year ago
"Why is it so dangerous for you to have people not believe in evolution?"
Er, projection much?
lisamariefan 1 year ago
@lisamariefan
Seriously, she's projecting with her "Why is it so important to you?" statement. Pretty fucking blatantly.
lisamariefan 1 year ago
go on richard, punch the ignorant cunt in the face
urbanspaceman1 1 year ago 2
i love this because Dawkins is just so fucking frustrated with this bitch u can see he just wants to fucking beat her ass to death but he's just too good of a person to really go off on her
JollyRogersBoy666 1 year ago
This woman is an idiot. Im not gonna waist anymore time explaining why its about as obvious as the sun is in the sky.
EAScreenplay 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Have you seen my Homo Erectus???"
325982668 1 year ago
She probably went to the creation museum.
patq911 1 year ago
im amazed that dawkins has so much self control. id have beat the living shit out of her by the end of the first video.
cubamexico5567 1 year ago
Do I sense frustration there, coctopus?
I would have been tempted to take her aggressiveness and brake it on her head.
Cheers
ekhaat 1 year ago
Wow, Dawkins has an AMAZING amount of self control. I think I would have unconsciously wrapped my hands around her neck and squeezed before the end of the first part. Though, honestly the sad part is that she pretty much used ALL of the arguments that creationists actually have anyway.
Arglactable 1 year ago
Evolution led to ideologies that are distracting the human race? What about the Spanish Inquisition who essentially tortured and killed anyone who didn't believe in the exact same things that the church did. Or the Crusades the were responsible for the genocide of thousands upon thousands of innocent Muslim people. And now you, who is distracting the focus of scientists (i.e. people of some value to the world, which you are not). Hypocrisy sure is a bitch.
TheShadyDealer144 1 year ago
I'm interested in seeing more of your comments on this bullshit. If you feel up to doing the rest of the videos, I feel up to watching them.
notthecheatr 1 year ago
IN THE NAME OF EVOLUTION! *plunges knife into someones chest*
wait... what? I wasnt supposed to do that?
TheAtheistWolf 1 year ago 20
Dawkins mentioned this part of the interview pretty much word for word in "The Greatest Show On Earth".....Seeing her say this bullshit with a fixed grin on her face is so much more infuriating than reading the transcript.
Her stubborness to ignore another argument, without trying to understand any part of it, shows a willful ignorance and a great fear on her part. At least Dawkins has listened to the creationist argument and the evidence (?) to support it.
antonyhamill 1 year ago
That retard acuses scientists of *attacking and being agressive* towards her infuriating stupidity, but when Dawkins calmly explains something to her she starts to laugh insencerely and ostentasiously only to mock him.
I TRULY admire Dawkins now. If it were me there, talking to that grimming moron I would have thrown her through the window straight off.
*Ahahahaha, evidence! Drawings, ahahahah.* what a dumb fuck. Someone needs to lock her in a room and shove fossils up her ignorant ass.
sapunec7854 1 year ago
I like how she keeps asking how dangerous it is... Hint - because people as her are historically ones that enjoy book burnings, people burnings and other such wholesome god fearin' activities.
ProphetTenebrae 1 year ago
Only reason to watch this full interview because c0ct0pus added his opinions because this dumb bitch says the same exact thing every part.
Mixb1mp213 1 year ago
The annoyance I felt seeing her dumb expression while talking to a brilliant man @ 8:41 convinced me that it's time to bring back the "bruning people alive at the stake" tradition. This time the "god-haters" will do the burning. Fuck humanism in her case.
domaataajs 1 year ago
If you've ever attended a private school that pulls that evangelical creationsim crap in the science classrooms, you know full well that THEY are the ones who censor out the evidence and resort to emtional statements trying to claim this is all about "respecting human life". My ass, they just can't handle life without their precious "god" friend making everything for them exactly the way their unopen, simplistic minds see things. I know all too well of this first hand.
pumarunner88 1 year ago
And these people are breeding in record numbers...
ReikoBleu1 1 year ago
Wright: Show me the evidence
Dawkins: Here is the evidence
Wright: Your aggressiveness holds us back, but let me go back to....
laprofessorapai 1 year ago 3
On one hand we have a theory of evolution backed up by 200 years of scientific research and over 200,000 scientific peer reviewed papers that says that humans evolved from slime (I think she means primordial soup) ...
while on the other hand we have a proposition that 'an invisible man created man out of mud and his wife out of his rib, who then insestiously populated the world' that is backed up by the dereanged writtings of uneducated bronse age dessert dwellers and no evidence ...
mmm, lol
fishypaw 1 year ago 2
When she says "in the museums that I've been to many times", watch her body language, she giggles nervously, her head turns away, then she shuts her eyes, then she looks down as she completes the sentence and then blinks a few times too. Anyone that knows the tiniest thing about body language can see that this is a blatant lie.
fishypaw 1 year ago 4
@fishypaw I thought that kind of body language indicated she had the hots on Dawkins
SCRulerShinoda 1 year ago
This woman is so fucking willfully ignorant it hurts my fucking brain.
Athiest2009 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOW TO HACK AOL®, YAHOO® AND HOTMAIL®? WE DO THAT FOR YOU! TRY US NOW! --
REVEAL-MAIL(...DOT..)NET --
etkenny1 1 year ago
"why is it so important to you, that everyone believe like you believe?" such a stupid question when its on the topic of evolution. Like Dawkins said he is talking about FACTS! Thats like him presenting facts that we are in a heliocentric solar system and her saying "why is it so important to you, that everyone believe like you believe?"
its because these are facts and you'd be stupid not to believe it.
thror13 1 year ago
lol......the guy wanted to punch her right in the face. lol.
johnher1982 1 year ago
Did this bitch just say "eugenisis"? That's not even a word.
I keep waiting for a baseball bat to come out of the side of the screen to bash her teeth out every time she flashes that condescending-but-oblivious smile.
GODDAMMIT
eksyte 1 year ago
"You seem to act like it's dangerous to believe people were created by a creator"
BECAUSE IT IS DANGEROUS TO BELIEVE THAT, DUMB BITCH. THAT GETS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE KILLED.
sunyavadin 1 year ago
Make all 12 parts, just don't do them back to back - make a series but also make videos on other topics in between.
pdblouin33 1 year ago
I do not condone violence, I really don't
But someone needs to slap this bitch! Such a smug arrogant cunt!
coloradojoey 1 year ago 3
I'd love to punch her right in the goddamn face.
bhxinfected 1 year ago 3
Her smile considering her arguments is strangely similar to that of a pathological liar.
user11235813213455 1 year ago
i've just figured it out, this woman is the real life version of the character 'Phoebe' from the tv sitcom 'Friends'. :)
concernedagain 1 year ago
freeze frame @ 4:55. This bitch is tweekin. Her cotton-mouth confirms it. Also at 4:55 : This is what people look like when they stare at a wall.
exconguitar 1 year ago
I'll watch, hell, I'm the one that started this.
drunkasssteve 1 year ago
I'll show her a homo-erectus
Zenn3k 1 year ago
Typical of the folks who want evidence and ignore it when presented. They want to see a monkey give birth to a man right on the spot. If their "God" came down and said to them "This is how I did it... with Evolution of Species by means of Natural Selection.", they'd deny he was their "God".
RyuDarragh 1 year ago
I want part four right now!!!!!!
enkeksinickia 1 year ago
I would watch all 12 of these if you made them, although im not sure you could take it though
lgr1991 1 year ago
OMG... Bible Barbie continues to HURR de DURR...
Foxlink69 1 year ago
Why again is part 2 and 3 blocked when I can watch part 1? BTW I'm in Florida. WTF?!
Apophiswillkillus 1 year ago
@Apophiswillkillus if you still haven't seen part 3, you can download it via the url i left as a comment on my own channel.
cheers
C0ct0pusPrime 1 year ago
Comment removed
johndebbra 1 year ago
Comment removed
johndebbra 1 year ago
I LOVE that at a point, RD has to resort to the argument 'no it doesn't' Because you can't argue against fact. This...evidence...yada..yada..yada.. nope... *ears in head* yada..yada..yada..
It's amazing... A sort of... Wow the stupid! it burns!
happysplodie 1 year ago
I also love the emotional emphasize she spreads on a mile thick, if it is about evolution it's "aggressive, infanticidal, censoring, evil"
where as a cre-a-tor is "moral, benevolent, caring"
Paxmax 1 year ago
Sorry if this seems a bit silly but if some people get these videos blocked based on their location the don't have access the the description either so they can't see the megaupload link either. It might be a better idea to put the links on your channel or in a separate video.
juditK2007 1 year ago
The laugh makes her sound like a brainwashed nutcase. Even the way she talks.
Dawkins shouldn't even be talking to her like an adult. Talk to her like she's 5.
PhoenixFirewolf 1 year ago
@PhoenixFirewolf TOTALLY! I keep thinking of that scene in Galaxy Quest when Sarris says "He doesn't understand. Explain as you would a child." She just seems to be CLUTCHING at her belief of her sacred text. Does she also believe the earth is flat?
ixnay66 1 year ago
Why the hell did Dawkins agree to this farce?
"I've seen the evidence, and I'm not convinced." Well, fuck, I guess that settles that. Evolution is wrong because you ignore the evidence. Oh, and dredging up these fossils is "aggressively" denouncing their position.
Elitistb616 1 year ago
The word you're looking for is "Crupid".
"People living in reality" Bwahahahahaha. Win!
lupocephalic 1 year ago
BELIEVE IN ZOMBIE JESUS
TheGreghingst 1 year ago
I think I seen her in a bukkake video before. I thought she looked familiar!
xIntoThePitx 1 year ago
Carbon dating is censored. It only goes back 6000 years, which in actuality is exactly why evolution has not held any fact. especially when you cant use a monkey heart for transplant. So the probability of evolution is likely, yet we have been lied to about a monkey theory when our DNA is closer to pigs & frogs. So if they werent saturating it with lies for there own agenda, then maybe we can start to look at serious zirkonian dating that proves 1 million years of being upright.
LendMeYourHand 1 year ago
@LendMeYourHand Carbon dating is reliable up to about 60 000 years. Other means of dating can go back much further (as in billions of years), but are less precise.
"So the probability of evolution is likely" Yes, it has been observed. It's 100% likely.
"yet we have been lied to about a monkey theory when our DNA is closer to pigs & frogs" Not according to those that have actually had a look at it. What's your source? And the reason we can't use monkey hearts is size-related.
Martymer81 1 year ago
@Martymer81 it is very evident of an agenda when we claim the validity behind carbon-14 dating. The evidence is only to support those who are lost in paradigm. The falsification of past records would have to be re dated to uncover there actual period in time. Nothing about 14C is valid when we have an ever changing environment that has spanned fossil fuels & nuclear technologies.
LendMeYourHand 1 year ago
@LendMeYourHand "it is very evident of an agenda when we claim the validity behind carbon-14 dating. "
Seriously, what claim are you making? If you know of some hidden agenda, can't you at least tell us what that agenda is???
"The evidence is only to support those who are lost in paradigm." Oh, that answers it. Sorry. They want to keep people believing C14-dating works because they want people to believe it works. You know... I think that's what they call a circular argument...
Martymer81 1 year ago
@Martymer81 if you could only understand 221 unnamed DNA strands classified as junk DNA & how this builds a misconception in relation to percentages that hold us to a monkey evolution. In this same sense, we hold 80% dog, this does not justify the probability that any of these unidentified strands can be turned on & off to create gills or wings, which might i add ARE in all humans. What do you think tonsils are??? Gills.... So our amphibian qualities are very evident.
LendMeYourHand 1 year ago
@LendMeYourHand: The mistake is the label "junk DNA". That's pure ignorance. All it really means is "DNA that may or may not do something at some point in time that I have not clue one about." - a lot of the so-called "junk" has been found to have a purpose in development. It's akin to the same silly notion that we only use 10% of our brains. The proper response to which is "At what point in time and under what situations?"
RyuDarragh 1 year ago
@LendMeYourHand I never said we weren't related to amphibians. We are. But you said we are closer to pigs and amphibians than to monkeys. Monkeys and humans are both primates. Pigs and dogs, like primates, are mammals. So yes, we're related to pigs and dogs, but not as closely as to monkeys. Mammals, like amphibians, are vertebrates. There's the connection between humans and frogs. This is elementary school biology! Seriously! As for junk DNA, see RyuDarragh's comment.
Martymer81 1 year ago
I love your videos but I just can' t watch this woman - she makes me feel ill!
flyingfisbeefilms 1 year ago
What? I have for for part 4? Wow.. this woman is crazy. She was going on about same-sex marriage on TV the other day with the same shit-eating grin and hollow eyes.
TheCuriosity1 1 year ago
sweet vid what a dumb bitch!
filthyfun 1 year ago
I think she's an IRL troll because of the way she smiles.
cogar48 1 year ago
This is probably why I can't argue atheism, the second time she asked for evidence I would have started calling her retarded. Dawkins has the patience of a God.
cogar48 1 year ago 10
in the name of Evolution, Stab! Oh ouch did it wrong.
jHotmetala 1 year ago
c0c you can't expose the bitch any more than you already have, nicely done
therealaug 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Where will you go to when you die? Have you ever told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain, or looked at someone with lust? If yes, then you are a lying, theiving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. When you die & stand before God you'll be guilty of breaking His law. The bible says you'll end up in Hell! So God sent God His Son Jesus to die for your sins, & He rose from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus died for your sins & was resurrected) you'll be saved!
gramosjr7 1 year ago
@gramosjr7 By that definition, you'll be burning in hell too. Be sure to bring some really strong sun screen. Maybe SPF 5,000,000
ixnay66 1 year ago
I'm blown away that this woman is in a position of relative power. What a moron. Can't describe my anger at this ridiculous excuse of an interview. Mr. Dawkins I give you full marks for infinite patience
TheHumanAlchemy 1 year ago 20
Ya Evolutionists DO censor out information that disprove evolution just like Heliocentrists DO censor out information that proves Geocentricity.
This bitch might as well be suggesting we teach the controversy of heliocentricity for fucks sake.
While we're at it let's go to the Gnostic Scrolls, the Muslim Kuran and teach the fucking controversies there.
This is why she's such a dumbshit above and beyond everything else. She's hung up on a SINGLE topic and can't see any hypocrisy what so ever.
makaisenki 1 year ago
i see 2 thumbs down... i'm feeling frustrated!!!
gskowal 1 year ago
Every time she says "Again, I say" I die a little.
prahanormal 1 year ago 6
The ultimate creationist argument, "NUH UHHHH!"
TheFallibleFiend 1 year ago 3
It's not just that they are willfully ignorant, but that they want to ensure that others - school children - are likewise ignorant.
TheFallibleFiend 1 year ago
he's talking to a brick wall. Seriously, he might be on drugs. =P
TrippWaLk 1 year ago
haha more to the point if some1 has a throrey and evidence that would disprove evolution then they would make a fortune.... I can see invites to Stockholm. lol.
karmaspayment616 1 year ago
i praise the guy who can count ho many times she changed the subject
tw0m0ch 1 year ago
PART 4 PART 5 PART 6!!!!
fonkymaster 1 year ago 2
you just have to understand you are talking to people that have had theology drilled into them since they could understand the language. they are nothing but products of their environment and untill they can see it that is they ever will be.
MrVeganGuy 1 year ago
8:58-9:27 DINOSAURS ARE REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jay666KJ 1 year ago
"Where's the evidence?"
"here."
"i don't except that evidence."
2 minutes later...
"you have no evidence."
"yeah we do, right here"
"you are being aggresive"
"no i'm not, you just wanted evidence"
"but there is no evidence"
"FUCK YOU" (walks out)
atheistnarutofan 1 year ago 18
Phony, intellectually dishonest cunt. You know that she is just trying to antagonize Dawkins to get him so frustrated that he "loses it". So she can turn point and say "see...all that aggression, if you truly believed in evolution" blah blah blah. I gotta say that he handled himself better then I ever could have.
melowar78 1 year ago 5