Added: 3 years ago
From: NewAmericaFoundation
Views: 3,478
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What i dont understand about first strike is why it is assumed u can hit an enemies silos before they launch. Surely they could detect incoming missles at some point in the trajectory and launch; also, wouldnt satelites detect the first strike being launched basically as the missles left the silos? If anyone knows about this stuff a response would be much appreciated :)

  • well. im no expert.... infact im nowhere near,

    but ive got a game called fallout 3, and apparently as it is said, "as the BOMBS fell" withan 's' imlying that many more than one bomb was dropped.. and even twohundered years after the bombs fell the world, wasnt over.

  • @KGzCLAN Fallout 3 isnt realistic, if you drop 30-40 nukes in a year. You will under go nuclear winter. Which would kill billions

  • @MrNukesftw not saying fallout is realistic and this is to KGzCLAN too but if you are really worried if fallout is realistic. New Vegas is more there las vegas wasnt bomb yes they droped multiple bombs at once but they didnt like line it up and drop 1 every 12 miles AND some where duds. So really i guess im saying there would most likely be survivors due to dud,bombs,incorrect drops, ETC. SOO fallout is a little correct but whatever im just typing u no. but yeaaa.

  • @mrboejangles2 Do you understand the yield of a nuclear weapon that would be used during a all-out all in war? The weapons used would be in the megaton's considering they would have to launch it from a silo, since there are no oceans near Las Vegas. A 20 megaton bomb would take out the whole map of Fallout new vegas, So would a 5 megaton bomb. And if it was a all out war the nations involved would launch somewhere near 1/3rd of their arsenal.

  • @MrNukesftw lol i was REALLY tired when i typed that i had no idea wat i was talking about i think i was trying to get at there would still be surviors or sumthing i dont remeber i was tired and i think i remember comments i saw on another video and i add some things i tought on those comments

  • Tsar Bomba was an extremely "clean" explosion, with very little fallout relative to its size. You're just making ungrounded assertions, since you haven't established A) how much fallout would be needed to end life and B) how much fallout a large nuclear weapon creates.

    Show me the citations and the numbers.

  • 12 nukes place in the world would be able to destroy the entire world within 2 years, how money nukes do the U.S. have ?

  • CountryWarheads active/total*Year of first test

    Five nuclear weapons states from the NPT United States2,700 / 9,400[12]1945 ("Trinity") Russia (former Soviet Union)4,840 / 13,000[12]1949 ("RDS-1")

     United Kingdom160 / 185[12]1952 ("Hurricane")

  • @fobos101 that's simply not true.

    Scores and scores of nuclear weapons have been tested since the first nuclear bomb was built. There's simply no way 12 nuclear weapons would destroy the entire world, and I'd love to see the data that you base that claim on.

  • ok think about it, the largest ever nuclear device detonated was the Tsar-Bomb was 50 megatons, there are 7 continents planting 12 of these strategically  would wipe out the world not in the actual damage caused but by the nuclear winter endued but the radioactive fall out.

  • And by me talking about destroying the world I'm am mearly talking about a mass extinction of species because destroying something that that is so huge 197,060,800 miles^2 in fact would be impossible

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more