chris3325. this is an awesome video. I am an anarcho capitalist and I agree 100% with what you say. Many are content to discuss the philosophical aspects of anarchism, but when asked to deal with the practical they don't deal with it. I have favourited your video, and I will make a response to your video in August when I start making vids again. I intend to do videos focussing solely on the benefits of anarchism and the practical implementation of said issues. Again - damn good video sir!
Corporations may still be the most powerful entities in an anti-statist society, but this is not solved through the creation of authoritarian systems. As you mentioned, corporate interests simply use their power to hijack the state.
I've not done any research into corporations in anarchy YET, but my opinion is that coporations would fade out over time in anarchy. Microsoft & Google exist as legal persons only bc of the state. Remove the state & their legal status disappears. Therefore, the CEO & directors would be held accountable for the loss of money in say a bank, or loss of money of the shareholders. Also many would go out of business without state support. U r more informed on anarchy - am I missing something?
- Not everyone is going to have the answer to every situation. No one has a perfect blueprint of what anarchist society will be like, nor did anyone have a blueprint of what capitalist society would be like for that matter.
- Ask your questions on the RevLeft forums. Lots of intelligent people that can give you good answers.
dude you only said 2 things but the first one is true and i know about Revleft forum not a huge fan actually not a fan but they are intelligent and they d tend to give solid answers
you know for more then six hours this has just been a pointless dribble of political debate (mind you it was fun) but damn i just realized how long winded i get when im pissed off this whole thing would have been more interesting and quicker if it where in some other sort of a forum (if that word is correctly applied) or a video i mean it woulda been funny as hell to watch
If you are for unlimited sessesion and think the "state" should not have any kind of monopoly on anything, and function like a corporation. Then you are an anarcho-capitalist.
I have no problem with gay what so ever however i will call him names knowing i always piss him off specially when i repost his wack off video all over youtube.
It still makes you come off like a biggot, and gives you no credibility. If I dislike a black guy and call him a nigger ... I do not only insult that one black guy. I insult every black guy by using his race as an insult. Your comment is not only offensive to Stodles, but to every person who is gay, and to every person who has empathy for gay people.
Anarchists are just angry wankers with either a problem with police authority, and want to influence their behaviour directly, or tight bastards who dont want to pay taxes due to not thinking through the ramifications properly
Theres the problem, i insulted you, and you say 'get fucked'. Now if you were in control of a local security force with no centralised responsibility, i hate to think what sort of trouble i just got myself into...
Some fucking improvement that would be. Dumb fuckfaced slimy arsed cockmaster.
you insulted me i reacted fucko you generalized every anarchist as oe of two things when in reality we're a pretty fuckin diverse group and im not gunna take some fuckface tellin me every anarchist is the same when its pretty much the opposite there are even different fuckin sub division of anarchy read into a little bit be4 you generalize every anarchist fucko generalize the stupid ones who haven't read korpotkin or books like anarchy in colonial america generalize those anarchists not all
I know as much about anachism as i need to know that the two generalisations i made apply to all of them my dimwitted friend.
Unless you are telling me you want to have a centralised police force that answer to the public at large and a centralised tax raising institution that invests for the whole populous?
If so i think its you that needs to look into what anarchism is before jumping under the banner.
Now get the fuck out you shit for bains lying spastic dog breathed window licking moron.
ive looked deeper into anarchism then you fuckin know exsist fucktard and people like confederalsocialist fall under stupoid anarchists you really dont know shit if you think you can use 2 generalizations to cover an entire group of people you wouldnt do trhat with race would you or with anything else now cut the shit stop the ad hominem have a real debate or fuck off you dumbass and stop talkin about think you have no idea about you have no right to speak about anarchy
you have no idea what anarchy is and neither does the main part of the people that call themselves anarchists who are just a buch of violent twats with no real clue about its origins or its great minds learn something be4 you speak fucko
I know all about its origins, dipshit, i know where and when its been used as a temporary form of organisation as a transitional form of order between one system and another. I know that giving fuckheads like you any more power and less accountability than what you already have is a grave mistake.
And those two generalisations cover all anachists quite succinctly. The only assumptions i made have been backed up by how you are self confessed to be angry and are imo a wanker.
Hes angry because you insulted him. Its normal to get angry when you get insulted. And you're obviously angry to sense you feel the need to call him a dipshit and tell him he needs to go eat shit and die. Sounds to me like you're just a hypocrite.
Oi, i made a generalisation that was quite accurate, i added 'angry wankers' from my experience. In fact it was him that started with the direct insults since i had never talked with him before.
Me calling him names stems from his initial response which asked me to get fucked. IMHO, once youve gone there you have crossed a line and begging for clean debate is something that he had no right to expect after that.
No, you made an ignorant generalization, and he got offended. You started it. And I can prove your generalization wrong right now. I'm an anarchist, and I'm neither angry nor a wanker.
Again that was not the meat of my statement, but if you want to focus on a few expletives like a fucking christain, go tight ahead. I think we both know the meat of my statement, the actual generalisation, was pretty fucking close to the mark..
Also, you cant say 'im not a wanker' as easily as you can say 'im not angry'. And even then you might come across as angry to people even when you dont feel it yourself. As for the wanker thing, i guess that entirely depends on who you ask, Someone whoe doesnt like you probably thinks you are a wanker...
Your right i dont like the police as an institution and ion my mind taxes are theft but not because i dont feel like paying out the money but because i dont feel like funding things i either dont use or dont beleive in and as for the police i realize most a genuinely ok people just tryin to make a buck or two and save a life here and there but there are ones that cross the lines and most of the time it isnt seen or isnt talked about and that makesme beleive that should be taken away gradually
The discussion of not paying taxes is potentially such a lengthy one which i assure you ends with me being able to justify nearly everything your taxes are spent on, which is why my initial comment was not an nice open invitation to debate. Im just lucky you will never have the opportunity to find out how pampered even you actually are in an organised society.
it is a lengthy one but again i said gradually i meant it for both rid the system of both gradually im not the anarchist you see screaming kill whitey or smash the system im the anarchist thinkin of ways to educate and create ways of not needing a system and when i say gradually i mean maybe not even in my lifetime should it be completely done if it started tommorrow
Here you are holding two contradictory paradigms. You cant efficiently create anything without a system. Try building youself a car, or even just an acoustic guitar. Without a system you are FUCKED. You self indulgent thinking is nothing but a waste of time and a cry for attention because its easier than learning an actual subject.
again read up on anarchy and come back to me anarchy does not mean that it is impossible for a complex trade system it just means it is a little more blurry upon how things happen chaos and anarchy are not the same anarchy is a peaceful semi utopian lawless society chaos is just as it implies
im saying ad hominem is fuckin pointless and only shows you cannot argue intelligently im not saying dont fuckin cuss id be a hypocrite for that but get fucked come on man if thats offensive to you you have never been on the internet or in a high school be4
Dude, nothing has offended ME here. You are a total hypocrite. Your saying get fucked is nothing to be offended about?, well neither is angry wanker k?
My position is that if you decided that you were going to focus on that undirected insult and take it personal and then reciprocate in kind, then i decided to push the insults to the limit for the lulz. Nothing more.
Youve managed to avoid the actual generalisations i was making for ~hours now, focusing solely on bad language :/
yes i am angry not at the world at you for your ignorance and your making of broad generalizations being angry at you for this does not make me a generally angry person actually normally im a very nice laid back person but i have my things thatll piss me off people talkin about things they dont know shit about and actin like they do is one of them fucko
I really couldnt care one fuck what kind of person you THINK you are, when i learnt at the age of 10 that self proclamation is a worthless as pig shit and its only by others perceptions that you can be judged for what kind of person you are.
Like people who run round saying how intelligent they are all the time, they are sure to be pretty retarded.
Judging by the sheer level of defensiveness you display at a simple undirected insult leads me to believe that i struck a nerve.
I dont think im laid back i know i am most cases at least and when you begin generalizing about something you dont know shit about it takes me way out of that and pisses me off expecially since its a subject matter i deem important you might not but i do and it does strike a nerve to be generalized by someone with obviously no real experiance with anarchist other then maybe seeing "anarchists" who made video on youtube
Hows this, i think youve been self-medicating marijuana for so long you have long ago lost any sense of you base level of emotion and would have problems with your mood if you quit. Thats just a guess of course but whatever...
You also say i dont know shit about it (anarchism) but you just agreed with both my generalisations in you last post. Perhaps that skunk is getting you memory too?
no i agreed with it for the stupid anarchists not all anarchist and i dont smoke weed i admit i did for a short tyime a long time ago but it lasted less then a monththere is a difference between stupid and intelligent anarchists and intelligent anarchists that appear stupid and stupid ones that appear smart the main one being smart ones want a peaceful semi utopian society in a state of lawlessness the stupid ones want chaos not anarchy there is a difference their to dumb to get it
Dude, you say it is stupid anarchists that would agree with my generalisations. BUT YOU PERSOANLLY WANT TO PHASE OUT THE POLICE/TAXES EXACTLY AS MY GENERALISATIONS STATED.... Do you even know what the fuck you are typing?
A utopian state of lawlessness sounds like a joke, and pure anarchy sounds retarded and absolutely impractical for FUCKING OBVIOUS REASONS. The same reasons that communism didnt work very well even though it looks great on paper.
First of all you didn't say we want to phase them out in the first comment you said we hate them. No, not all of us hate them, but of course we want to phase them out, they're fucking useless. The polices job is to enforce the law not to protect you, anyone can protect you so there's no need for them. And taxes are nothing more than extortion. Also, statism is far more utopian. As if a state can really keep the peace and stop people from killing people.
Dude, stop. You sound like a fucking retard. Its against the law to attack people so the polices job is to protect people from being attacked. If there was no police, what stops my dad paying 6000GBP to pay off some of the local militia to let him kill his troublesome neighbours instead of spending on self-tracking cameras? I think it would be great if he could kill the wankers but i would never really want that, it would be a TOTAL FUCKING MESS.
no kidding man its Dallas then NYC the Vegas then Miami L.A i think was about 7th when i saw it about 2 months ago it was kind of cool to look at i wish i remember where i found it
most likely i also kinda realized a similar correlation with the amount of punks that were there in the 80's with the number of corrupt cops but thats neither here nor there (sorry bout the over use of this term it happens to be one of my favorites)
And what about the internet. That was created under puclic reasearch grants. Ive heared anarchists say " yeah well weve already got the internet so we dont need to pay taxes any more"
Which is a fucking joke, lets just remain at our current level of technology, let companies die, lets all farm our own shit, let the economies of scale become so tilted that there is not enough order to maintain a large enough infrastructure with balanced rules to make any further progress.....
Yeah did you hear me say that though don't act like what other anarchists said i have said not every anarchist thinks alike most dont even come close to thinking alike like i for example think completely different from D4shawn or confederalsocialist both of which in my opinion are self righteous wankers and confederalsocialist basically a nice version of a nazi have you heard any of the things he has said he doesnt want anarchy he wants fascism disguised as anarchy i completely disagree with
Also, if you think that a state of anarchism will go any way to further stop murderers from murdering, you are sorely mistaken. Im no criminal psychologist but i would like to inform you that people who are going to kill people are going to kill people whatever. How the fuck would anarchy stop a roaming serial killer. Get the fuck out you stupid tosser.
again listen to what i have been saying i have been saying gradual after a mentality change possibly probably hopefully not within my lifetime although it would be nice to have the mental change and that happen in my lifettime i dont see it happening fuckin listen to the things i have said
"Im no criminal psychologist but i would like to inform you that people who are going to kill people are going to kill people whatever. How the fuck would anarchy stop a roaming serial killer."
Simple, through them in prision just like they do now. Anarchy means no rulers not no courts or jails. Learn what anarchy is before you try arguing about it.
ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID? ITS CALLED VIGILANTE! You don't need taxes to get together, catch someone, and throw them in prison. You can say you need taxes for the prison, but if you look at societies like the old west you would know that that's no fucking problem.
Least you arnt hiding the crazy from me mate :) What was teh death rate in the Wild West?, you were lucky if you lived through your 30's, and you are suggesting that this would be a BETTER way to live LMFAO, sure Clint, erm i mean Cunt.
A centralised intelligence agency with trained professionals and massive experience from chasing criminals have a hard enough problem finding organised crime, you think soft grass chewing sissy boys like you could wonder round accusing people of shit? get real.
Jesus Christ you're a bigger retard than I thought. The reason the old west had a high death rate was because it didn't have the same medical technology we have today, not because it was a stateless society. And the reason you have large criminal organizations such as drug cartels is because OF the law. If drugs gambling and prostitution weren't illegal they won't be as powerful and could be stop easier. And how you can try to argue against anarchy without even knowing what it is, is beyond me.
Thats doesnt stop people just robbing/killing for valuable possessions for resale elsewhere. Something that i wager would be prevalent in a society where all you had to do was kill the guy you pay to watch your street and then rob the fuck out of anyone since there would be little in the way of industrial security systems in a system with no corporations. Dont say tech will remain the same, it will deteriorate due to economies of scale. Same is true with medicine.
The law doesn't stop that either numbnuts. And if someone got mugged, the mugger would be arrested. As I have stated MANY fucking times before, anarchy, or statelessness, is not a system without courts or jails. Technology would not deteriorate because its human nature to advance it to make life easier. The state didn't need to hold a gun to our heads to get it this far, people advanced technology to were it is today on their own terms.
Holy shit that's the most pathetic argument I've herd you make yet. The state financing university's made it easier for their research but it didn't CAUSE IT. They would've conducted their research regardless of the state helping. For Example, they could be like cancer and aids research and operate based on donations. Besides, technology advanced for THOUSANDS of years with out state funding.
Neccesisty is the mother of invention. The internet may never have been invented outside a state. Its initial charge was to facilitate running of the state itself in dire circumstances, but look at it now.
And every single argument you have put forward has been pathetic. Vigilantes, Voluntary contribution to research. Mass production of machinery / technology / medicine with no cooperations or any sort of environment to protect financial interest...
Wtf are you talking about? First of all, vigilante is hardly a pathetic argument considering it has worked in the past. Second, when the fuck did I say there would be no industry. Of course there would because it would be necessary to meet the needs of the masses. What do you mean no laws to protect corporate financial interest, do you by any chance mean barrier to entry? And if you think voluntary contribution to research is a pathetic argument then you're a fucking idiot.
and yet you failed to sucessfully refute anything either of us have said and instead substitued your or assumption of our thinkings you are seriously brain dead fucko
semi utopian not utopian its obvious that utopian societies are currently impossible by semi utopian i mean something close it doesnt have to be exact but close is fine with me it is better then the things i see in this world currently
The things you see are as a result of PEOPLE, who are not utopian in the slightest...
If you even think you could function in such a way as to be useful to any kind of utopian society then im gonna call you a liar, or summise that you have no capacity for rational self criticism.
I would fuck you over for my own personal gain in a second if i knew that only a local militia would be interested in my misdeeds. Fuck, id take pleasure in doing it to you in the system you like so much.
i know i would not be near as useful as i would want but damnit in some ways i would deffinately be useful in a semi utopian society as for you your one of the reasons i said it most likely would not happen in my lifetime sir do you have any concept of what i mean by gradual cvhange i dont mea plunging in mindlessly i mean changing until the minds of the people are ready my mind isready but that doesnt mean everyone elses is thats why i said gradaul change fuckin read what i say
Dude, it wont happen in anyone's lifetime. Im pretty sure as you get older and lose your virginity / start raising kids, you will begin to appreciate the structured society and will no doubt think back to this and chuckle at your radical notions. Im pretty sure my 85yo granddad wouldnt want to have to be too actively involved in his personal security and im personally thankful that no criminal organisation has the capacity to overwhelm the police in manner of direct force.
just read what the fuck i say accept i have my opinion you have yours your not changing me i dont want to change you ive already lost my virginity but thats neither here nor there and it really never will be im most likely never havin kids kudos to the people that do but i honestly know i could never be a fatherim pretty sure your 85 year old granddad doesnt want to be actively involved in his own secuirity to but honestly at a point you die end of story sad but true
im pretty sure that when im 85, i dont really want to be fucking around paying vigilantes to watch my house every time i call one dimensional pricks like you angry wankers and you get angry to the point you cant type properly (your words not mine).
Im pretty sure i wouldnt want to still be working at the age of 85, so taxes/ massive investment funds are a useful feature of society.
Bottom line, the system needs to be fixed, removing the system over any amount of time is fucking stupid.
those are my words not yours but im never a good typist (is that the proper term for it) and when im pissed (more appropriate term) it makes it horrible when i type
Its fucking stupid because you have no method in your madness, just saying 'its gonna take a long time' doesnt help change peoples perceptions and the VAST majority like the idea of security offered by a state. Im prety sure if we didnt have the early states such as ancient Greece/ Macedonia that we would still be wondering around int he jungle. Many anarchists ive spoken to like this scenario but imo, while we exist, as wierd as that is, we might as well reach out even if out hands get burnt
i said it could take centuries to change the mentality of a civilization and yes it would now whichever way people are educated can dictate the way a society changes and significant mental changes happen quite often usually every decade but thats neither here nor there ovver the course of a century it is quite possible for a mental change to happen that would be in favor oif a peaceful anarchy i do not like the idea of wondering in the jungle but anarchy does not mean we cannot be civilized
But you are changing society and peoples thoughs for the worst. Its like christainity depicting knowledge as a bad thing, you are walking blindly into absolute despotism. There is NOTHING you can do to change the mentality of people to the extent that they will all care for each other. You only have to look at some children to see that.
Please, end this now, with every post YOUR ignorance and sheltered thought processes are becoming massively obvious...
for the worse in your stand point see thats where we differ its a stand point thing you see safety as more important then actual freedoms i see freedoms as more important then my own safety I am going to quote Peter korpotkin here
In existing States a fresh law is looked upon as a remedy for evil. Instead of themselves altering what is bad, people begin by demanding a law to alter it.
take that into thought i have my opinion i am resolute in my stand point and i will not change
Problem is, your freedom quickly deteriorates into the freedom to change the problem with the absolute authority of violence. You might as well be a muslim, they run their law system like this in many countries. Admittedly they have further institutional inequity in terms of cast/gender but seriously, i wouldnt want to be on the wrong end of any misunderstanding in your world. I wouldnt feel free at all in a world where supreme authority was called upon to resolve most disputes. Enjoy your life.
you are again misunderstanding lawlessness for chaos lawlessness does not mean that there is no way of settling disputes lawlessness simply means there is no standard way of settling disputes each case is individual it does not mean no courts it is simply more complicated sadly but its worth the freedom
Infact, im pretty sure the current people who are rich would LOVE to be top dogs in this world of yours, you would systematically change their position from influential head of industry to king/land baron... Well done.
you have no clue what your talking about at this point you are argueing against a form of anarchy that among intellectual anarchist is laughed at you are argueing against anarcho primitism look at what the fuck ive said what your argueing against is not the form of anarchy i support you are argueing chaos not anarchy or more exactly anarcho syndaclism/ anarcho capitalism (both on a similar spectrum) but i cannot explain in a single paragraph the fine points of anarchism
maybe you should attempt to learn something before you judge it dumbass you have no idea what ive been talking about no matter how many times i tell you you are not worth talking to you are not just ignorant as ithought you where but you are unintelligent to you are one of the people not worth wasting time with reasoning with you is like attempting to reason with a 9/11 truther fuck off good day and have a fun life
Dude, ive refuted every single thing you have presented in one way or another, you call me uneducated when you spell like a 10 year old child. You lack the self-criticism to even know that you are a retard.
you refuted shit you dumb mother fucker you fuckin argueed against shit i didnt even fuckin bring up that where no part of what i said and fuckin acted like you made a fuckin point you are uneducate and unintelligent your a fuckin retard your afuckin worthless shit
now if youlll fuckin excuse me i have shit other thn this to do so fuck off as i said stop wasting my time stop wasting your time stop wasting machines time you are sucessful at nothing
I am laid back just not about ignorant fucktards like you talkin about things they have no studies into and know fuck all about you could have picked a million other subjects and i would have no problem with criticism but when your talkin about somethin like you know as much about it as me and trying to refute e on when its obvious you dont know shit about it im gunna get seriously pissed
I use adhoms for the lulz, but i can tell you are one angry motherfucker :/
Seems to me that you know as much about people as you do about spelling and grammar, otherwise you would know anarchism was a fucking stupid idea in general.
Keep toking those j's and knocking the spirits back you angry piss head.
I dont fuckin toke you fuck up I am layed back but when im pissed im pissed when i feel like shit i feel like shit i know seems like a song quote there but oh well i get sing songy every once in awhile when im tired in pain and angry at the same time and the tired and in pain part as nothing to do with this fyi its more to do with helping someone move and i do drink on occasion ive been drunk maybe twice in my life both times while i was 16 but now i drink maybe twice a year
Again, you are still focusing on irrelivent aspects of my very first post because you know i nailed your position in terms of police/taxes so you are simply grumbling about the angry wanker part, claiming to be laid back but coming across about as far from that as possible...
Why are you bending over to these anarchist morons? Do you think they care about reality or practicality? Do you think they are truly trying to figure out what would be the best way to do things in the real world?
They aren't. Anarchy to them is a religion. They are emotionally invested in this pathetic "ideal", and they don't give two squirts of piss whether it has any meaning in reality or not.
They will rationalize away anything you throw at them, for the sake of their precious "ideal".
The poor can't afford private schooling. The rich pay for the poor children's schooling through taxes.
That is how they afford it. If the rich did not pay taxes, then only the rich kids could afford to go to school. All the poor kids (a majority) would not go to school, and that would cause many problems.
Government organizations are not "always" less efficient. They are sometimes less, maybe even most of the time. But you miss the point: we can fix the system instead of throwing it out.
Well, I don't think you can call them hypocrites. Most of our nukes are left over from the cold war, They're not easy to get rid of, and now the politicians finally got it in their head that they're dangerous so it would make sense that they're concerned about other countries getting nukes.
woah, wikipedia, perfectly reliable. Besides, you think the US government would let on to their entire stockpile? oh yeah and then there's this :weapons#ESTIMATED_ worldwide_ nuclear_ stockpiles
Fuckin ead what i have been saying GRADUAL CHANGE i do not mean weithin a year or even years i mean decades possibly centuries thats the only way i see it possible i am still considered an anarchist because i want to be a part of that change however small and innsignificant my part may be i want to be a part of that change you are completely missing my fucking points
Actually you pretty much are talking to the 9/11 truthers when it comes to your average anarchist. Not to say that anarchy itself is wrong, it just has as much a dumb ass demographic as anything. P-zombies hop on board every ideology, especially if it looks trendy or like something all the cool kids are doing. If it wasn't for people like ConfederalSocialist most of them wouldn't have a clue what the fuck they were talking about, hell, they probably still don't & just root for colloquial anarchy
"If it wasn't for people like ConfederalSocialist most of them wouldn't have a clue"
Not that CS has any clue of what he's talking about either.
That imbecile is always talking about "emergent" this and that but it seems to have never occurred to him that ANY complex phenomenon, be it physical, biological, or social, is "emergent", including the state.
why should education be free? Public schools are doing a poor job of educating the children already. You don't need to attend a school that costs $50,000/year or probably even a $1000/year to be an educated individual. There are three years that can already read before they even enter school. I did most of my learning outside the classroom. I would further go on to say that the public education system hindered me from honing my critical thinking skills.
A corporation can only come about in side of a government. A large group taxed as one entity. The stateless society is less something that can be attained, but more a guiding direction to fight off government rule. All governments will strive to gain more power over it's people. As a matter of freedom we should all be fighting for a stateless society to keep those in power at bay and to quite those who would give up there freedoms.
Utopian anarchism only exists in the realm of philosophy/fantasy.
The second you expose it to reality it falls apart. Im still looking for a shred of evidence for its practical application. And f you say the Spanish Civil war Ill squeel with indignation.
How can you say you dont have to pay tax going to schools when you think education should be Kicked up a few notches? are you for or against education. Peace nig
I was going to link this brilliant video rainskullvids made on how to bring down the state through Agorism, but he's closed his account! God DAMNIT! Anyway, hopefully it'll show up soon.
Yes, people who act hostile in debates bugs me like few other things. I feel honestly sorry for you.
i like CS ideas but like you said i cant envision it actually being practicable.. i just have this feelin that human nature would get in the way and groups with power resembling the state would naturally formulate anyway.. there are many examples of democracy/government working well around the world, i dont know of any examples of successful anarchy.. tho im not well read on it.. should prob google it at least b4 commentin, oh well too late, i've hit 'po
chris, you just suck....
zenser5 1 year ago
chris i think your mom should have nawd your head off at birth.
derinjezik 1 year ago
you're the fattest fucking troll i've ever seen
thebeartaxes 2 years ago
You suck more then i do and i suck a lot :D idiot very idiot
LameLeoJokes 2 years ago
r u drunk?
blaabyman 2 years ago
chris3325. this is an awesome video. I am an anarcho capitalist and I agree 100% with what you say. Many are content to discuss the philosophical aspects of anarchism, but when asked to deal with the practical they don't deal with it. I have favourited your video, and I will make a response to your video in August when I start making vids again. I intend to do videos focussing solely on the benefits of anarchism and the practical implementation of said issues. Again - damn good video sir!
aimlessdrifting 2 years ago
as long as your pointing a gun... there is no reason to even debate.
sexdrugsRnR 2 years ago
if you're pointing the gun you're too naive and afraid to debate
cameronjamesparker 2 years ago
Corporations may still be the most powerful entities in an anti-statist society, but this is not solved through the creation of authoritarian systems. As you mentioned, corporate interests simply use their power to hijack the state.
Luke12000 2 years ago
I've not done any research into corporations in anarchy YET, but my opinion is that coporations would fade out over time in anarchy. Microsoft & Google exist as legal persons only bc of the state. Remove the state & their legal status disappears. Therefore, the CEO & directors would be held accountable for the loss of money in say a bank, or loss of money of the shareholders. Also many would go out of business without state support. U r more informed on anarchy - am I missing something?
aimlessdrifting 2 years ago
Corporations are unnecessary.
RaymondDundas 2 years ago
I have a few things to say:
- Not everyone is going to have the answer to every situation. No one has a perfect blueprint of what anarchist society will be like, nor did anyone have a blueprint of what capitalist society would be like for that matter.
- Ask your questions on the RevLeft forums. Lots of intelligent people that can give you good answers.
destructicon500 2 years ago
dude you only said 2 things but the first one is true and i know about Revleft forum not a huge fan actually not a fan but they are intelligent and they d tend to give solid answers
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
you know for more then six hours this has just been a pointless dribble of political debate (mind you it was fun) but damn i just realized how long winded i get when im pissed off this whole thing would have been more interesting and quicker if it where in some other sort of a forum (if that word is correctly applied) or a video i mean it woulda been funny as hell to watch
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
If you are for unlimited sessesion and think the "state" should not have any kind of monopoly on anything, and function like a corporation. Then you are an anarcho-capitalist.
Mastikator 2 years ago
confederalsocialist AKA stodles is a good for nothing raciest, faggot
theracemixer 2 years ago
so it is okay to hate on someone for their sexuality, but not their race? ... elaborate
aaron0883 2 years ago
I hated the shit head before i knew he was gay.
I have no problem with gay what so ever however i will call him names knowing i always piss him off specially when i repost his wack off video all over youtube.
theracemixer 2 years ago 2
It still makes you come off like a biggot, and gives you no credibility. If I dislike a black guy and call him a nigger ... I do not only insult that one black guy. I insult every black guy by using his race as an insult. Your comment is not only offensive to Stodles, but to every person who is gay, and to every person who has empathy for gay people.
aaron0883 2 years ago
If the end result is him getting pissed off
i'm happy with it. in other word whatever means necessary (collateral damage)
theracemixer 2 years ago 3
Anarchists are just angry wankers with either a problem with police authority, and want to influence their behaviour directly, or tight bastards who dont want to pay taxes due to not thinking through the ramifications properly
Aspartame69 2 years ago
im neither of those and yet still and anarchist you generalize to much sir get fucked
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Wow. Are you fucking kidding.
eragon2121 2 years ago
i was responding to a commentor not the video pay attention fucko
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
My apologies. Youtube's commenting system is confusing and retarded as fuck.
eragon2121 2 years ago
ahh its all good bro i get confused by it to
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Theres the problem, i insulted you, and you say 'get fucked'. Now if you were in control of a local security force with no centralised responsibility, i hate to think what sort of trouble i just got myself into...
Some fucking improvement that would be. Dumb fuckfaced slimy arsed cockmaster.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
you insulted me i reacted fucko you generalized every anarchist as oe of two things when in reality we're a pretty fuckin diverse group and im not gunna take some fuckface tellin me every anarchist is the same when its pretty much the opposite there are even different fuckin sub division of anarchy read into a little bit be4 you generalize every anarchist fucko generalize the stupid ones who haven't read korpotkin or books like anarchy in colonial america generalize those anarchists not all
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
I know as much about anachism as i need to know that the two generalisations i made apply to all of them my dimwitted friend.
Unless you are telling me you want to have a centralised police force that answer to the public at large and a centralised tax raising institution that invests for the whole populous?
If so i think its you that needs to look into what anarchism is before jumping under the banner.
Now get the fuck out you shit for bains lying spastic dog breathed window licking moron.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
ive looked deeper into anarchism then you fuckin know exsist fucktard and people like confederalsocialist fall under stupoid anarchists you really dont know shit if you think you can use 2 generalizations to cover an entire group of people you wouldnt do trhat with race would you or with anything else now cut the shit stop the ad hominem have a real debate or fuck off you dumbass and stop talkin about think you have no idea about you have no right to speak about anarchy
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
stupid* thing* my bad angry typing sucks
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
you have no idea what anarchy is and neither does the main part of the people that call themselves anarchists who are just a buch of violent twats with no real clue about its origins or its great minds learn something be4 you speak fucko
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
I know all about its origins, dipshit, i know where and when its been used as a temporary form of organisation as a transitional form of order between one system and another. I know that giving fuckheads like you any more power and less accountability than what you already have is a grave mistake.
Now go eat shit and die bastard.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
And those two generalisations cover all anachists quite succinctly. The only assumptions i made have been backed up by how you are self confessed to be angry and are imo a wanker.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Hes angry because you insulted him. Its normal to get angry when you get insulted. And you're obviously angry to sense you feel the need to call him a dipshit and tell him he needs to go eat shit and die. Sounds to me like you're just a hypocrite.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Oi, i made a generalisation that was quite accurate, i added 'angry wankers' from my experience. In fact it was him that started with the direct insults since i had never talked with him before.
Me calling him names stems from his initial response which asked me to get fucked. IMHO, once youve gone there you have crossed a line and begging for clean debate is something that he had no right to expect after that.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
No, you made an ignorant generalization, and he got offended. You started it. And I can prove your generalization wrong right now. I'm an anarchist, and I'm neither angry nor a wanker.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Again that was not the meat of my statement, but if you want to focus on a few expletives like a fucking christain, go tight ahead. I think we both know the meat of my statement, the actual generalisation, was pretty fucking close to the mark..
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Also, you cant say 'im not a wanker' as easily as you can say 'im not angry'. And even then you might come across as angry to people even when you dont feel it yourself. As for the wanker thing, i guess that entirely depends on who you ask, Someone whoe doesnt like you probably thinks you are a wanker...
Aspartame69 2 years ago
then everybody is a wanker we are just a species of wankers
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Thats about quality of substance of that part of my statement, yet you insist on dwelling on it for quite some time now.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Your right i dont like the police as an institution and ion my mind taxes are theft but not because i dont feel like paying out the money but because i dont feel like funding things i either dont use or dont beleive in and as for the police i realize most a genuinely ok people just tryin to make a buck or two and save a life here and there but there are ones that cross the lines and most of the time it isnt seen or isnt talked about and that makesme beleive that should be taken away gradually
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
The discussion of not paying taxes is potentially such a lengthy one which i assure you ends with me being able to justify nearly everything your taxes are spent on, which is why my initial comment was not an nice open invitation to debate. Im just lucky you will never have the opportunity to find out how pampered even you actually are in an organised society.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
it is a lengthy one but again i said gradually i meant it for both rid the system of both gradually im not the anarchist you see screaming kill whitey or smash the system im the anarchist thinkin of ways to educate and create ways of not needing a system and when i say gradually i mean maybe not even in my lifetime should it be completely done if it started tommorrow
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Here you are holding two contradictory paradigms. You cant efficiently create anything without a system. Try building youself a car, or even just an acoustic guitar. Without a system you are FUCKED. You self indulgent thinking is nothing but a waste of time and a cry for attention because its easier than learning an actual subject.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
again read up on anarchy and come back to me anarchy does not mean that it is impossible for a complex trade system it just means it is a little more blurry upon how things happen chaos and anarchy are not the same anarchy is a peaceful semi utopian lawless society chaos is just as it implies
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
People are not utopian. Thats really the end of any practical discussion...
Aspartame69 2 years ago
I said semi uptopian full utopian is impossible but a semi utopian society in the real world is possible
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Also, you list every band under the sun on your profile but dont include Acid Bath, i know for sure you are a total wanker now.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Oh shit thanks for reminding me. I also forgot to list rush lol.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
you should list crass and dropkick
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
im saying ad hominem is fuckin pointless and only shows you cannot argue intelligently im not saying dont fuckin cuss id be a hypocrite for that but get fucked come on man if thats offensive to you you have never been on the internet or in a high school be4
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dude, nothing has offended ME here. You are a total hypocrite. Your saying get fucked is nothing to be offended about?, well neither is angry wanker k?
My position is that if you decided that you were going to focus on that undirected insult and take it personal and then reciprocate in kind, then i decided to push the insults to the limit for the lulz. Nothing more.
Youve managed to avoid the actual generalisations i was making for ~hours now, focusing solely on bad language :/
Aspartame69 2 years ago
yes i am angry not at the world at you for your ignorance and your making of broad generalizations being angry at you for this does not make me a generally angry person actually normally im a very nice laid back person but i have my things thatll piss me off people talkin about things they dont know shit about and actin like they do is one of them fucko
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
I really couldnt care one fuck what kind of person you THINK you are, when i learnt at the age of 10 that self proclamation is a worthless as pig shit and its only by others perceptions that you can be judged for what kind of person you are.
Like people who run round saying how intelligent they are all the time, they are sure to be pretty retarded.
Judging by the sheer level of defensiveness you display at a simple undirected insult leads me to believe that i struck a nerve.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
I dont think im laid back i know i am most cases at least and when you begin generalizing about something you dont know shit about it takes me way out of that and pisses me off expecially since its a subject matter i deem important you might not but i do and it does strike a nerve to be generalized by someone with obviously no real experiance with anarchist other then maybe seeing "anarchists" who made video on youtube
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Hows this, i think youve been self-medicating marijuana for so long you have long ago lost any sense of you base level of emotion and would have problems with your mood if you quit. Thats just a guess of course but whatever...
You also say i dont know shit about it (anarchism) but you just agreed with both my generalisations in you last post. Perhaps that skunk is getting you memory too?
Aspartame69 2 years ago
no i agreed with it for the stupid anarchists not all anarchist and i dont smoke weed i admit i did for a short tyime a long time ago but it lasted less then a monththere is a difference between stupid and intelligent anarchists and intelligent anarchists that appear stupid and stupid ones that appear smart the main one being smart ones want a peaceful semi utopian society in a state of lawlessness the stupid ones want chaos not anarchy there is a difference their to dumb to get it
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dude, you say it is stupid anarchists that would agree with my generalisations. BUT YOU PERSOANLLY WANT TO PHASE OUT THE POLICE/TAXES EXACTLY AS MY GENERALISATIONS STATED.... Do you even know what the fuck you are typing?
A utopian state of lawlessness sounds like a joke, and pure anarchy sounds retarded and absolutely impractical for FUCKING OBVIOUS REASONS. The same reasons that communism didnt work very well even though it looks great on paper.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
First of all you didn't say we want to phase them out in the first comment you said we hate them. No, not all of us hate them, but of course we want to phase them out, they're fucking useless. The polices job is to enforce the law not to protect you, anyone can protect you so there's no need for them. And taxes are nothing more than extortion. Also, statism is far more utopian. As if a state can really keep the peace and stop people from killing people.
If it could, it wouldn't need the police.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Dude, stop. You sound like a fucking retard. Its against the law to attack people so the polices job is to protect people from being attacked. If there was no police, what stops my dad paying 6000GBP to pay off some of the local militia to let him kill his troublesome neighbours instead of spending on self-tracking cameras? I think it would be great if he could kill the wankers but i would never really want that, it would be a TOTAL FUCKING MESS.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
"Its against the law to attack people so the polices job is to protect people from being attacked."
No, its the polices job to enforce that law, ANYONE can protect you.
"If there was no police, what stops my dad paying 6000GBP to pay off some of the local militia to let him kill his troublesome neighbours"
What stops him from paying the cops off, there is such things as corrupt cops you know just go to L.A.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
texas surprisingly (or not) is the worst for police brutality and corruption (statistically)
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
No kidding? Dam that is a surprise, I would figure l.a., new york, or Miami.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
no kidding man its Dallas then NYC the Vegas then Miami L.A i think was about 7th when i saw it about 2 months ago it was kind of cool to look at i wish i remember where i found it
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dallas probably because most god groupies are hypocrites and they got all the Mexican drug cartels down there.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
most likely i also kinda realized a similar correlation with the amount of punks that were there in the 80's with the number of corrupt cops but thats neither here nor there (sorry bout the over use of this term it happens to be one of my favorites)
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
And what about the internet. That was created under puclic reasearch grants. Ive heared anarchists say " yeah well weve already got the internet so we dont need to pay taxes any more"
Which is a fucking joke, lets just remain at our current level of technology, let companies die, lets all farm our own shit, let the economies of scale become so tilted that there is not enough order to maintain a large enough infrastructure with balanced rules to make any further progress.....
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Yeah did you hear me say that though don't act like what other anarchists said i have said not every anarchist thinks alike most dont even come close to thinking alike like i for example think completely different from D4shawn or confederalsocialist both of which in my opinion are self righteous wankers and confederalsocialist basically a nice version of a nazi have you heard any of the things he has said he doesnt want anarchy he wants fascism disguised as anarchy i completely disagree with
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Also, if you think that a state of anarchism will go any way to further stop murderers from murdering, you are sorely mistaken. Im no criminal psychologist but i would like to inform you that people who are going to kill people are going to kill people whatever. How the fuck would anarchy stop a roaming serial killer. Get the fuck out you stupid tosser.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
again listen to what i have been saying i have been saying gradual after a mentality change possibly probably hopefully not within my lifetime although it would be nice to have the mental change and that happen in my lifettime i dont see it happening fuckin listen to the things i have said
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
"Im no criminal psychologist but i would like to inform you that people who are going to kill people are going to kill people whatever. How the fuck would anarchy stop a roaming serial killer."
Simple, through them in prision just like they do now. Anarchy means no rulers not no courts or jails. Learn what anarchy is before you try arguing about it.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
You fucking idiot, with no taxes, who is going to catch a roaming bunch of murderous thieves?
End of conversation get the fuck out tosspot.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID? ITS CALLED VIGILANTE! You don't need taxes to get together, catch someone, and throw them in prison. You can say you need taxes for the prison, but if you look at societies like the old west you would know that that's no fucking problem.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Least you arnt hiding the crazy from me mate :) What was teh death rate in the Wild West?, you were lucky if you lived through your 30's, and you are suggesting that this would be a BETTER way to live LMFAO, sure Clint, erm i mean Cunt.
A centralised intelligence agency with trained professionals and massive experience from chasing criminals have a hard enough problem finding organised crime, you think soft grass chewing sissy boys like you could wonder round accusing people of shit? get real.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Jesus Christ you're a bigger retard than I thought. The reason the old west had a high death rate was because it didn't have the same medical technology we have today, not because it was a stateless society. And the reason you have large criminal organizations such as drug cartels is because OF the law. If drugs gambling and prostitution weren't illegal they won't be as powerful and could be stop easier. And how you can try to argue against anarchy without even knowing what it is, is beyond me.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Thats doesnt stop people just robbing/killing for valuable possessions for resale elsewhere. Something that i wager would be prevalent in a society where all you had to do was kill the guy you pay to watch your street and then rob the fuck out of anyone since there would be little in the way of industrial security systems in a system with no corporations. Dont say tech will remain the same, it will deteriorate due to economies of scale. Same is true with medicine.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
The law doesn't stop that either numbnuts. And if someone got mugged, the mugger would be arrested. As I have stated MANY fucking times before, anarchy, or statelessness, is not a system without courts or jails. Technology would not deteriorate because its human nature to advance it to make life easier. The state didn't need to hold a gun to our heads to get it this far, people advanced technology to were it is today on their own terms.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Taxes paid for the internet you thick cunt. Taxes pay for universities where the bulk of scientific discovery in pure-science is conducted.
How about learning about your current society before going off on a foolish tangent.
Case fucking closed.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Holy shit that's the most pathetic argument I've herd you make yet. The state financing university's made it easier for their research but it didn't CAUSE IT. They would've conducted their research regardless of the state helping. For Example, they could be like cancer and aids research and operate based on donations. Besides, technology advanced for THOUSANDS of years with out state funding.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Neccesisty is the mother of invention. The internet may never have been invented outside a state. Its initial charge was to facilitate running of the state itself in dire circumstances, but look at it now.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
And every single argument you have put forward has been pathetic. Vigilantes, Voluntary contribution to research. Mass production of machinery / technology / medicine with no cooperations or any sort of environment to protect financial interest...
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Wtf are you talking about? First of all, vigilante is hardly a pathetic argument considering it has worked in the past. Second, when the fuck did I say there would be no industry. Of course there would because it would be necessary to meet the needs of the masses. What do you mean no laws to protect corporate financial interest, do you by any chance mean barrier to entry? And if you think voluntary contribution to research is a pathetic argument then you're a fucking idiot.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
and yet you failed to sucessfully refute anything either of us have said and instead substitued your or assumption of our thinkings you are seriously brain dead fucko
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
semi utopian not utopian its obvious that utopian societies are currently impossible by semi utopian i mean something close it doesnt have to be exact but close is fine with me it is better then the things i see in this world currently
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
The things you see are as a result of PEOPLE, who are not utopian in the slightest...
If you even think you could function in such a way as to be useful to any kind of utopian society then im gonna call you a liar, or summise that you have no capacity for rational self criticism.
I would fuck you over for my own personal gain in a second if i knew that only a local militia would be interested in my misdeeds. Fuck, id take pleasure in doing it to you in the system you like so much.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
i know i would not be near as useful as i would want but damnit in some ways i would deffinately be useful in a semi utopian society as for you your one of the reasons i said it most likely would not happen in my lifetime sir do you have any concept of what i mean by gradual cvhange i dont mea plunging in mindlessly i mean changing until the minds of the people are ready my mind isready but that doesnt mean everyone elses is thats why i said gradaul change fuckin read what i say
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dude, it wont happen in anyone's lifetime. Im pretty sure as you get older and lose your virginity / start raising kids, you will begin to appreciate the structured society and will no doubt think back to this and chuckle at your radical notions. Im pretty sure my 85yo granddad wouldnt want to have to be too actively involved in his personal security and im personally thankful that no criminal organisation has the capacity to overwhelm the police in manner of direct force.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
just read what the fuck i say accept i have my opinion you have yours your not changing me i dont want to change you ive already lost my virginity but thats neither here nor there and it really never will be im most likely never havin kids kudos to the people that do but i honestly know i could never be a fatherim pretty sure your 85 year old granddad doesnt want to be actively involved in his own secuirity to but honestly at a point you die end of story sad but true
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
im pretty sure that when im 85, i dont really want to be fucking around paying vigilantes to watch my house every time i call one dimensional pricks like you angry wankers and you get angry to the point you cant type properly (your words not mine).
Im pretty sure i wouldnt want to still be working at the age of 85, so taxes/ massive investment funds are a useful feature of society.
Bottom line, the system needs to be fixed, removing the system over any amount of time is fucking stupid.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
those are my words not yours but im never a good typist (is that the proper term for it) and when im pissed (more appropriate term) it makes it horrible when i type
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Its fucking stupid because you have no method in your madness, just saying 'its gonna take a long time' doesnt help change peoples perceptions and the VAST majority like the idea of security offered by a state. Im prety sure if we didnt have the early states such as ancient Greece/ Macedonia that we would still be wondering around int he jungle. Many anarchists ive spoken to like this scenario but imo, while we exist, as wierd as that is, we might as well reach out even if out hands get burnt
Aspartame69 2 years ago
i said it could take centuries to change the mentality of a civilization and yes it would now whichever way people are educated can dictate the way a society changes and significant mental changes happen quite often usually every decade but thats neither here nor there ovver the course of a century it is quite possible for a mental change to happen that would be in favor oif a peaceful anarchy i do not like the idea of wondering in the jungle but anarchy does not mean we cannot be civilized
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
But you are changing society and peoples thoughs for the worst. Its like christainity depicting knowledge as a bad thing, you are walking blindly into absolute despotism. There is NOTHING you can do to change the mentality of people to the extent that they will all care for each other. You only have to look at some children to see that.
Please, end this now, with every post YOUR ignorance and sheltered thought processes are becoming massively obvious...
Aspartame69 2 years ago
for the worse in your stand point see thats where we differ its a stand point thing you see safety as more important then actual freedoms i see freedoms as more important then my own safety I am going to quote Peter korpotkin here
In existing States a fresh law is looked upon as a remedy for evil. Instead of themselves altering what is bad, people begin by demanding a law to alter it.
take that into thought i have my opinion i am resolute in my stand point and i will not change
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Problem is, your freedom quickly deteriorates into the freedom to change the problem with the absolute authority of violence. You might as well be a muslim, they run their law system like this in many countries. Admittedly they have further institutional inequity in terms of cast/gender but seriously, i wouldnt want to be on the wrong end of any misunderstanding in your world. I wouldnt feel free at all in a world where supreme authority was called upon to resolve most disputes. Enjoy your life.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
you are again misunderstanding lawlessness for chaos lawlessness does not mean that there is no way of settling disputes lawlessness simply means there is no standard way of settling disputes each case is individual it does not mean no courts it is simply more complicated sadly but its worth the freedom
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Infact, im pretty sure the current people who are rich would LOVE to be top dogs in this world of yours, you would systematically change their position from influential head of industry to king/land baron... Well done.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
you have no clue what your talking about at this point you are argueing against a form of anarchy that among intellectual anarchist is laughed at you are argueing against anarcho primitism look at what the fuck ive said what your argueing against is not the form of anarchy i support you are argueing chaos not anarchy or more exactly anarcho syndaclism/ anarcho capitalism (both on a similar spectrum) but i cannot explain in a single paragraph the fine points of anarchism
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Indeed you cant, you sound like any other retarded anachist with every comment you post.
Bye bye now, enjoy hurling nonsence like the town crazy in the comfort of our statism.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
maybe you should attempt to learn something before you judge it dumbass you have no idea what ive been talking about no matter how many times i tell you you are not worth talking to you are not just ignorant as ithought you where but you are unintelligent to you are one of the people not worth wasting time with reasoning with you is like attempting to reason with a 9/11 truther fuck off good day and have a fun life
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dude, ive refuted every single thing you have presented in one way or another, you call me uneducated when you spell like a 10 year old child. You lack the self-criticism to even know that you are a retard.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
you refuted shit you dumb mother fucker you fuckin argueed against shit i didnt even fuckin bring up that where no part of what i said and fuckin acted like you made a fuckin point you are uneducate and unintelligent your a fuckin retard your afuckin worthless shit
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
now if youlll fuckin excuse me i have shit other thn this to do so fuck off as i said stop wasting my time stop wasting your time stop wasting machines time you are sucessful at nothing
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dude, you are not layed back i the slightest, YOU are the reason anarchism should never and never will work.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
I am laid back just not about ignorant fucktards like you talkin about things they have no studies into and know fuck all about you could have picked a million other subjects and i would have no problem with criticism but when your talkin about somethin like you know as much about it as me and trying to refute e on when its obvious you dont know shit about it im gunna get seriously pissed
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dude, then you are not layed back.
I use adhoms for the lulz, but i can tell you are one angry motherfucker :/
Seems to me that you know as much about people as you do about spelling and grammar, otherwise you would know anarchism was a fucking stupid idea in general.
Keep toking those j's and knocking the spirits back you angry piss head.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
I dont fuckin toke you fuck up I am layed back but when im pissed im pissed when i feel like shit i feel like shit i know seems like a song quote there but oh well i get sing songy every once in awhile when im tired in pain and angry at the same time and the tired and in pain part as nothing to do with this fyi its more to do with helping someone move and i do drink on occasion ive been drunk maybe twice in my life both times while i was 16 but now i drink maybe twice a year
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Dude chill, hes just trolling you.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
i know man
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Hes a fucking successful one though. His insults didn't mean shit, but the sheer stupidity made me rage to no end.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
bit of a strange tangent that really didnt say shit last comment sucked oh well strange tangent are fun
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
Again, you are still focusing on irrelivent aspects of my very first post because you know i nailed your position in terms of police/taxes so you are simply grumbling about the angry wanker part, claiming to be laid back but coming across about as far from that as possible...
Aspartame69 2 years ago
i was thinking about the internet connection as a
a street or privately owned highway .
Realizalize 2 years ago
Ebay is like walmart, torrents are like the illegal DVD stand, and viruses are like rednecks with rifles.
ArtypNk 2 years ago
well aren't you cool. lighting a cigarette whilst recording your youtube video.
TheDastardlyDildo 2 years ago
Why are you bending over to these anarchist morons? Do you think they care about reality or practicality? Do you think they are truly trying to figure out what would be the best way to do things in the real world?
They aren't. Anarchy to them is a religion. They are emotionally invested in this pathetic "ideal", and they don't give two squirts of piss whether it has any meaning in reality or not.
They will rationalize away anything you throw at them, for the sake of their precious "ideal".
TheSockWithNoName 2 years ago
At 4:04,
Most people cannot afford private schools. Wait a sec,
Government organizations are always less efficient (i.e. more expensive) than the private organizations (i.e. less expensive)
+
Most people already pay for public schools through the taxes extorted from them.
= most people cannot afford private schooling?
Am I the only one who caught that?
Shezmu 2 years ago
The poor can't afford private schooling. The rich pay for the poor children's schooling through taxes.
That is how they afford it. If the rich did not pay taxes, then only the rich kids could afford to go to school. All the poor kids (a majority) would not go to school, and that would cause many problems.
Government organizations are not "always" less efficient. They are sometimes less, maybe even most of the time. But you miss the point: we can fix the system instead of throwing it out.
MNICY 2 years ago
what cigs do u smoke? if its bitch menthol im unsubscribing
JordoSkate101 2 years ago
Marlboro reds. IF i smoked menthol id unsubscribe myself from life.
chris3325 2 years ago
Very nice shirt. Looks like it's not your size, though. Not that there's anything wrong with that, lol.
Neither enemy nor friend, I am back from a world where such words are meaningless. I have come to do battle with you.
BTW, if you want to prevent having lung cancer, you should try to stop smoking. It's for your own good. :)
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
The simple answer: agorism
The more detailed answer: I have no fucking idea!
DeraJa 2 years ago
response rendering, it will probably be up in a couple hours
napalmtube 2 years ago
Where do you get all these video game shirts?
WiggyTheCanuck 2 years ago
A corporation is defined as a business firm whose articles of incorporation have been approved by a higher organization (usually the state).
So your point is totally moot; a corporation cannot exist without higher governance.
OriginalityEatsYou 2 years ago 2
seriously....America has thousands maybe even ten thousand + nuclear weapons?
symillickg 2 years ago
More than I think.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
so they complain about other countries have 1 or 2 and blitz they city but america is ok to have thousands of them....What hypocrites!!!!!
symillickg 2 years ago
Well, I don't think you can call them hypocrites. Most of our nukes are left over from the cold war, They're not easy to get rid of, and now the politicians finally got it in their head that they're dangerous so it would make sense that they're concerned about other countries getting nukes.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
@symillickg "America has thousands"
active / inactive warheads
2,700 / 9,400
en. wikipedia. org/wiki/List_ of_ states_ with_ nuclear_ weapons#Estimated_ worldwide_ nuclear_ stockpiles
hitssquad 2 years ago
woah, wikipedia, perfectly reliable. Besides, you think the US government would let on to their entire stockpile? oh yeah and then there's this :weapons#ESTIMATED_ worldwide_ nuclear_ stockpiles
Syntheticbrawler 2 years ago
Its not much of a deterent if no one knows you have them.
Its the countries that dont tell you they posses them that are worrisome, since a secret nuclear weapon is obviously not intended as a deterrent.
Aspartame69 2 years ago
Fuckin ead what i have been saying GRADUAL CHANGE i do not mean weithin a year or even years i mean decades possibly centuries thats the only way i see it possible i am still considered an anarchist because i want to be a part of that change however small and innsignificant my part may be i want to be a part of that change you are completely missing my fucking points
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
wow alot of vids in a short space of time.
symillickg 2 years ago
Actually you pretty much are talking to the 9/11 truthers when it comes to your average anarchist. Not to say that anarchy itself is wrong, it just has as much a dumb ass demographic as anything. P-zombies hop on board every ideology, especially if it looks trendy or like something all the cool kids are doing. If it wasn't for people like ConfederalSocialist most of them wouldn't have a clue what the fuck they were talking about, hell, they probably still don't & just root for colloquial anarchy
MassZombicide 2 years ago
If you really think your average anarchist is comparable to truthers then you're retarded.
MachineLegion 2 years ago
I see I'm not the only hyperbolic one.
MassZombicide 2 years ago
MassZombicide:
"If it wasn't for people like ConfederalSocialist most of them wouldn't have a clue"
Not that CS has any clue of what he's talking about either.
That imbecile is always talking about "emergent" this and that but it seems to have never occurred to him that ANY complex phenomenon, be it physical, biological, or social, is "emergent", including the state.
TheSockWithNoName 2 years ago
Also there's his preoccupation with race, which loses him some credibility.
MassZombicide 2 years ago
@MassZombicide "his preoccupation with race [...] loses him some credibility."
In what way?
psychology. uwo. ca/faculty/rushton_pubs. htm
psychology. uwo. ca/faculty/rushton_pubs. rushtonpdfs/Intelligence%20and%20How%20to%20Get%20It%20(Working%20Paper). pdf
hitssquad 2 years ago
"Love is the answer, and you know that for sure."
-John Lennon
ObsidianTeen 2 years ago
why should education be free? Public schools are doing a poor job of educating the children already. You don't need to attend a school that costs $50,000/year or probably even a $1000/year to be an educated individual. There are three years that can already read before they even enter school. I did most of my learning outside the classroom. I would further go on to say that the public education system hindered me from honing my critical thinking skills.
Pentazoid111 2 years ago
excellent vid.
BornInAsphodelMeadow 2 years ago
A corporation can only come about in side of a government. A large group taxed as one entity. The stateless society is less something that can be attained, but more a guiding direction to fight off government rule. All governments will strive to gain more power over it's people. As a matter of freedom we should all be fighting for a stateless society to keep those in power at bay and to quite those who would give up there freedoms.
PFTECHMETAL 2 years ago
Anarchists will have one answer to a lot of your questions: DROs.
Which ironically, is a form of government whether they have the mental rigour to admit it or not.
elitemathlete 2 years ago 4
What does DRO stand for?
Loserido 2 years ago
Dispute Resolution Organization, or for those who prefer less hardcore terms, a good synonym would be Private defense agencies, iirc.
Shezmu 2 years ago
Utopian anarchism only exists in the realm of philosophy/fantasy.
The second you expose it to reality it falls apart. Im still looking for a shred of evidence for its practical application. And f you say the Spanish Civil war Ill squeel with indignation.
elitemathlete 2 years ago 2
I think only people that use welfare should have to pay for it.
elitemathlete 2 years ago
How can you say you dont have to pay tax going to schools when you think education should be Kicked up a few notches? are you for or against education. Peace nig
sirgir101 2 years ago
Alot of the money spent on education is waste.
chris3325 2 years ago
Why do you give a shit what they think, Chris?
gatorboymike 2 years ago
You set the combative tone in your last vid. This one was much more effective.
RaddNiner 2 years ago
I was going to link this brilliant video rainskullvids made on how to bring down the state through Agorism, but he's closed his account! God DAMNIT! Anyway, hopefully it'll show up soon.
Yes, people who act hostile in debates bugs me like few other things. I feel honestly sorry for you.
Loserido 2 years ago
Yo!!!
TOMMYfromtheBRONX 2 years ago
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
sirgir101 2 years ago
Ey yo Tommy!
C17Citadel 2 years ago
Assassin's Creed sucked
Dislekseyuh 2 years ago
yeah it did
sirgir101 2 years ago
lies
chris3325 2 years ago
As a non-smoker, out of curiousity I have to ask you - why do you blow the smoke back over your cigarette?
LatumWay 2 years ago
Hes just blowing it, there is no particular reason to do it.
sirgir101 2 years ago
I asked myself the same question and didn´t find an answer yet.
SchinTeth 2 years ago
After i light it i do it to make sure the coal stays lit. Im not sure if it really does anything its just sort of a habit.
chris3325 2 years ago
ahh.
LatumWay 2 years ago
ive wanted to know the same thing i smoke and i dont do that
AnarchisticAttitude 2 years ago
i like CS ideas but like you said i cant envision it actually being practicable.. i just have this feelin that human nature would get in the way and groups with power resembling the state would naturally formulate anyway.. there are many examples of democracy/government working well around the world, i dont know of any examples of successful anarchy.. tho im not well read on it.. should prob google it at least b4 commentin, oh well too late, i've hit 'po
oojamaflipper 2 years ago