Whateve would you say, as a former Iron Curtain person, between Western and Soviet/Rusian Imperialism I prefer the first one. We've bin screwd for too many year by the russian, milions of people died in Siberia, and the whole shit happedning in caucasus, ukraine, belarus is because of the soviet.
In 1982 the deficits were at $100 to $200 billion a year. Even though today is a $3.93 billion per day. Yet Ohbama says he was going to borrow a page from the Regannomics...I can't rember what part it was but it involves the Trickle down effect.
But the idea here was to decrease the deficit not increase. I'm not paying for it.
How about giving the whole story of October Surprise, instead of 1/2. The story was from Jack Anderson of the Washington Post - "alleging" such a deal. 2 sep. Congr. Inv. as well as several journalist invs. of the charge. All concluding that there was no plan by the Reagan people.
So when an ass like yourself make's up a half truth or lie as you did, it just make's you look more like a "dumb ass"!
Carter? You gotta be kidding me. Carter spent 444 days serving kiss ass political platitudes. fact is the Iranians simply didn't respect him. They did however respect Reagan. They KNEW he would come in and kick their asses.
As for Russia, which is it? Were they super tough ultimate power or were they dying on the vine. Libs can never get that one figured out. They pick thier version depending on the conversation at hand. fact is, wherever the russians leaked reagan hung a bucket.
If he didn't have the "Commies" to hate, what would Reagan's foreign policy have looked like? The great Commie "International conspiracy" never fucking existed. And it's the only thing that you nutfucks had to rally around for 45 years. And fear is the only thing you have to offer people today as well. Thirty-thousand Nicaraguans dead for a fucking conservative whack-nut conspiracy theory. Nice. Sleep well. But, to gain my respect, spout your views in Nicaragua where the dead have memories.
Au contraire, my collectivist bubble-headed wing nut, but the hostages were released after Reagan won the election. Evidently, the Iranians bought the Dems lie that Reagan would nuke them. As for Russia, I'll take Gorbachev's account over your leftist fairy tale.
Sorry to burst your collective bubble, Republignats. Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with the breakup of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union imploded from within. It imploded due to its bloated bureacracy.
Ronald Reagan also had nothing to do with the freeing of American hostages in Iran. Jimmy Carter had set those wheels in motion, and Reagan, true to form, took the credit without ever acknowledging Carter.
Actually even Gorbachev would disagree with you, when Gorbachev was asked what caused the USSR to collapse his response was in Russian "the United States litterally outspent us". My question to you is what did weak knee carter have do to get Iran to release those hostages. Reagan openly made threats to Iran. The terrorists never did or have to this day feared carter. Terrorists don't understand talk or reason, and if u honestly think talk gets hostages released ur living in a fairy tale.
Outspending? Perhaps. But the collapse occurred from within.
You like to call Carter "weak kneed" forgetting that the hostages were released a few days before Carter left office. Reagan had nothing to do with their release. Absolutely nothing. It's called negotiation. Carter negotiated peace between Egypt and Israel; a peace that stands until today. He also negotiated the release of the Iran hostages. Reagan, true to form, stepped up and took credit where no credit was due.
You are 23 years old. What do you even know about the hostage crisis? What were the demands of the hostage takers? Name them. C'mon. I'm waiting. We'll see what you really know about the hostage crisis and its roots. C'mon, bitch. I'm waiting.
At your age you think that the answer to everything is to kill first and ask questions later. You have no concept of moderation or reason. You learn these from experience only.
The hostages in Iran were not "free" during Carter's admin. Members of his administration did, however, negotiate for their release prior to Regan taking office. Other than take credit for it, Reagan's poeple, I'm afraid, did absolutely nothing to effect their release.
Slight correction: Reagan's people DID effect the hostages release, in October 1980 his people met in Paris with senior figures in the newly formed Islamic republic of Iran and negotiated a DELAY in the release of the hostages. This was to ensure that Carter lost the election and made Reagan look good by hitting the ground running.
Don't take my word for it Google "October Surprise" for yourselves.
Your time is over America, you blew it by becoming too fat, dumb and happy (i.e ignorant)
I'm afraid you are completely incorrect. Jimmy Carter was the one who had the secret negotiations with Iranian officials. Ronald Reagan, on the other hand, had the political shrewdness to take credit for it ... just as you parrot his shrewdness twenty-eight years later.
Here is your prescription:
#1. Take Google firmly in your hands.
#2. Drop your pants.
#3. Place Google - ever so gingerly - up the anus of your exposed rectum.
"Stop living in denial and admit that your arrogance is an inevitable by product of your ignorance."
If by writing "your arrogance" you were referring to the arrogance of my country's post-WW2 U.S. foreign policy, I have no problem makng such a statement. The late-70s Iranian hostage crisis was presaged by CIA's overthrow of Mossadeq in 1953, the installation of the Shah, and the Shah's brutal regime enforced by the Savak secret police. I'm ignorant? Hardly, you suck-ass dog.
Well done on 1953 but thats only half the story. Your country was also behind the Shah's overthrow in the late 70's, along with British intelligence(and the BBC.) These are the Shah's words, not mine. Watch his interview with Mike Wallace for proof.
The Mullahs received a huge push from the western establishment. This is documented fact.
My beef with people like you is that you don't realize that you are being lied to day in and day out.
"You'd take the word of the Shah" You'd take the word of Reagan? LMAO!!!!
You seem to be forgetting that Reagan lied through his pearly whites over IRAN CONTRA. Go and educate yourself about your countries history before tarnishing my comments you fucking retard.
What the hell makes you say that? I loathed every fucking second that senile old pig was in office. I know all about Iran-Contra. Killed 30,000 Nicaraguans all to satisfy Ronald Reagan's bloated anti-communist paranoia. I'm a big fan of William Blum; a man who has done more to illuminate the goings-on of the CIA & post-WW2 US military misdeeds than anyone alive. You're barking at the wrong tree, my friend. I post on Reagan videos to antagonize his admirers.
The reason it may be over for America, is that they did become lazy, claiming their work to be done by others, clamining stronger government. But by being happy...no quite opposite on that one
"why do you vote for the party of bloated bureacracy, the democrats?"
Well, this is conservative idea (going on forty years old now) of calling the Democrats anything they like and getting away with it because no one challenges the inherent falsity of the statement. Cont...
This is what you are taught in "Conservative school". Small government, small government. In truth, conservatives don't want to do away with government in the least. They make goverment intentionally dysfunctional (Katrina? Public schools?) so that they can privatize as much of it as they possibly can, getting rich off of the privatization. (Blackwater anyone?) Also, to finance the Iraq War, they have inccurred massive debt. Your grandchildren will still be paying China back 60 years from now.
I am looking forward to government becoming once again functional under Obama. I'm not looking for hand outs, just functionality. And some form of affordable health care. Medical bills are the #1 reason for personal bankruptcy in the U.S. today.
It took Bill Clinton 8 years to bring the deficit under control. It took George the Idiot 8 more to run it back up. Spread the wealth? Hell, Geroge the Idiot has been spreading the wealth for the past 8 yrs, making the wealthy even wealthier.
help inform the ignorant. watch the money masters documentary. itnernational bankers have been in control of the world's governments for a long time. they are the only ones who have profitted from this war by the money and power they've gained; the liberties we've lost have been gained by the governments they control. they control the governments, schools, media, and church. all candidates are pro war and pro big government. it is up to we the people to inform others.
Along with this tremendous opportunity, however, comes the threat of abuse. With the increase in the number of people online, a significant percentage of the country's population is exposed to an increasing number of expressions of bigotry and hate that are readily available on the Internet. Following the tragic events which occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001, the threat of violence due to hate-based ideas and values has become a pressing reality.
The Internet, with its precision and speed, provides individuals with both access to information and the opportunity to reach listeners they otherwise would have been unable to reach without this medium. The Internet provides every user with the potential to become a publisher. This capability permits the content of this medium to be nearly as diverse as human thought itself.
I'd crawl a mile over broken glass to have him back with us alive and serving a 3rd term.
drewnwalker 6 months ago
AS the Madelein Albright have said if you have big military why not use it. I agree Russians are Stupid.
aviomaster 10 months ago
And here is a new joke:
Question at redio Erevan: Is it true that Romania was always good friend with the USSR?
Answer: Yes. For exemple, in economy: We were giving them grain, and in exchange they were taking our korn
rareshud 11 months ago
Whateve would you say, as a former Iron Curtain person, between Western and Soviet/Rusian Imperialism I prefer the first one. We've bin screwd for too many year by the russian, milions of people died in Siberia, and the whole shit happedning in caucasus, ukraine, belarus is because of the soviet.
rareshud 11 months ago
that was good joke
tomreves28 1 year ago
buen documental
leosbeljimenez 1 year ago
Reagan makes the Bushes and obama look like fucking bad jokes!
crabtrap 1 year ago 7
A truly great President!!!!!
arepadetrigo 1 year ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Great guy, but mediocre president.
snowwolf7777 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
800 military bases , Huge military expenditure , Bombs and destruction that is what is coming from USA ,,,
IF Gorbachev had a chicken brain he would have Send all those missiles on USA ,,, and the world would be a lot better place today ...
aviomaster 2 years ago
@aviomaster Yeah! That way, every country that isn't China would have failed by now! I totally agree, man!
JamesiaInc 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
666 ronald wilson reagan... What a bozo.
Thejbirdy 2 years ago
In 1982 the deficits were at $100 to $200 billion a year. Even though today is a $3.93 billion per day. Yet Ohbama says he was going to borrow a page from the Regannomics...I can't rember what part it was but it involves the Trickle down effect.
But the idea here was to decrease the deficit not increase. I'm not paying for it.
yesterdaysblues69 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
rot in hell regan
Ghosafizzle 2 years ago
Reagan, a true leader, a cowboy, a fine American. A living piece of beef jerky.
I love Kool Aid.
Thejbirdy 2 years ago 6
I read Ronald Reagan's book of soviet jokes. Funny thing is, lots of them were popular Jewish jokes about Hitler with names changed.
DerBlitzStag 2 years ago
God damn, Ronald Reagan was a hell of a president. By FAR, the best we've had in the last 50 years.
TimeWarp66 2 years ago 10
How about giving the whole story of October Surprise, instead of 1/2. The story was from Jack Anderson of the Washington Post - "alleging" such a deal. 2 sep. Congr. Inv. as well as several journalist invs. of the charge. All concluding that there was no plan by the Reagan people.
So when an ass like yourself make's up a half truth or lie as you did, it just make's you look more like a "dumb ass"!
golf7272 3 years ago
regan was great
thatcheritescot 3 years ago 18
They messed up the years of his presidency.
He was president from 81 to 89 not 80 to 88.
msynman 3 years ago
Carter? You gotta be kidding me. Carter spent 444 days serving kiss ass political platitudes. fact is the Iranians simply didn't respect him. They did however respect Reagan. They KNEW he would come in and kick their asses.
As for Russia, which is it? Were they super tough ultimate power or were they dying on the vine. Libs can never get that one figured out. They pick thier version depending on the conversation at hand. fact is, wherever the russians leaked reagan hung a bucket.
Boatmonkey2 3 years ago
If he didn't have the "Commies" to hate, what would Reagan's foreign policy have looked like? The great Commie "International conspiracy" never fucking existed. And it's the only thing that you nutfucks had to rally around for 45 years. And fear is the only thing you have to offer people today as well. Thirty-thousand Nicaraguans dead for a fucking conservative whack-nut conspiracy theory. Nice. Sleep well. But, to gain my respect, spout your views in Nicaragua where the dead have memories.
bapyou 3 years ago
you aint seen noting yet
HEYARNOLD5 3 years ago
Au contraire, my collectivist bubble-headed wing nut, but the hostages were released after Reagan won the election. Evidently, the Iranians bought the Dems lie that Reagan would nuke them. As for Russia, I'll take Gorbachev's account over your leftist fairy tale.
ArchibaldGrant 3 years ago 3
CCCP socialist equality
12valvepower1 3 years ago
Sorry to burst your collective bubble, Republignats. Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with the breakup of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union imploded from within. It imploded due to its bloated bureacracy.
Ronald Reagan also had nothing to do with the freeing of American hostages in Iran. Jimmy Carter had set those wheels in motion, and Reagan, true to form, took the credit without ever acknowledging Carter.
bapyou 3 years ago
Actually even Gorbachev would disagree with you, when Gorbachev was asked what caused the USSR to collapse his response was in Russian "the United States litterally outspent us". My question to you is what did weak knee carter have do to get Iran to release those hostages. Reagan openly made threats to Iran. The terrorists never did or have to this day feared carter. Terrorists don't understand talk or reason, and if u honestly think talk gets hostages released ur living in a fairy tale.
ecj48 3 years ago 2
Outspending? Perhaps. But the collapse occurred from within.
You like to call Carter "weak kneed" forgetting that the hostages were released a few days before Carter left office. Reagan had nothing to do with their release. Absolutely nothing. It's called negotiation. Carter negotiated peace between Egypt and Israel; a peace that stands until today. He also negotiated the release of the Iran hostages. Reagan, true to form, stepped up and took credit where no credit was due.
bapyou 3 years ago
Correction, Iran waited until minutes after Reagan was sworn into office to release the hostages as a slap to Carter. Look it up.
Kaji01 3 years ago
You are 23 years old. What do you even know about the hostage crisis? What were the demands of the hostage takers? Name them. C'mon. I'm waiting. We'll see what you really know about the hostage crisis and its roots. C'mon, bitch. I'm waiting.
At your age you think that the answer to everything is to kill first and ask questions later. You have no concept of moderation or reason. You learn these from experience only.
bapyou 3 years ago
that is hilarious. if the soviet union collapsed from bloated bureaucracy, then why do you vote for the party of bloated bureacracy, the democrats?
also carter freed the hostages, yeah...
also i keep hearing republignats? what is that a play on? I'm not sure i even get it
Monty1994 3 years ago
Oi. A twenty-three year old.
The hostages in Iran were not "free" during Carter's admin. Members of his administration did, however, negotiate for their release prior to Regan taking office. Other than take credit for it, Reagan's poeple, I'm afraid, did absolutely nothing to effect their release.
bapyou 3 years ago
Slight correction: Reagan's people DID effect the hostages release, in October 1980 his people met in Paris with senior figures in the newly formed Islamic republic of Iran and negotiated a DELAY in the release of the hostages. This was to ensure that Carter lost the election and made Reagan look good by hitting the ground running.
Don't take my word for it Google "October Surprise" for yourselves.
Your time is over America, you blew it by becoming too fat, dumb and happy (i.e ignorant)
jamesadams2717 3 years ago
I'm afraid you are completely incorrect. Jimmy Carter was the one who had the secret negotiations with Iranian officials. Ronald Reagan, on the other hand, had the political shrewdness to take credit for it ... just as you parrot his shrewdness twenty-eight years later.
Here is your prescription:
#1. Take Google firmly in your hands.
#2. Drop your pants.
#3. Place Google - ever so gingerly - up the anus of your exposed rectum.
#4. Have a nice day.
bapyou 3 years ago
MESSAGE TO: bapyou
Up your ass you delusional cretin. Your country is fucked and you know it.
Stop living in denial and admit that your arrogance is an inevitable by product of your ignorance.
Now go away and slurp up as much shit as you can, because you are full of it.
jamesadams2717 3 years ago
"Stop living in denial and admit that your arrogance is an inevitable by product of your ignorance."
If by writing "your arrogance" you were referring to the arrogance of my country's post-WW2 U.S. foreign policy, I have no problem makng such a statement. The late-70s Iranian hostage crisis was presaged by CIA's overthrow of Mossadeq in 1953, the installation of the Shah, and the Shah's brutal regime enforced by the Savak secret police. I'm ignorant? Hardly, you suck-ass dog.
bapyou 3 years ago
Well done on 1953 but thats only half the story. Your country was also behind the Shah's overthrow in the late 70's, along with British intelligence(and the BBC.) These are the Shah's words, not mine. Watch his interview with Mike Wallace for proof.
The Mullahs received a huge push from the western establishment. This is documented fact.
My beef with people like you is that you don't realize that you are being lied to day in and day out.
Face it, you're just another brick in the wall
jamesadams2717 3 years ago
"you don't realize that you are being lied to day in and day out."
Hah. You'd take the word of the Shah abd I'm a "brick in the wall"?
And you are a fucking duped moron.
bapyou 3 years ago
"You'd take the word of the Shah" You'd take the word of Reagan? LMAO!!!!
You seem to be forgetting that Reagan lied through his pearly whites over IRAN CONTRA. Go and educate yourself about your countries history before tarnishing my comments you fucking retard.
jamesadams2717 3 years ago
"You'd take the word of Reagan?"
What the hell makes you say that? I loathed every fucking second that senile old pig was in office. I know all about Iran-Contra. Killed 30,000 Nicaraguans all to satisfy Ronald Reagan's bloated anti-communist paranoia. I'm a big fan of William Blum; a man who has done more to illuminate the goings-on of the CIA & post-WW2 US military misdeeds than anyone alive. You're barking at the wrong tree, my friend. I post on Reagan videos to antagonize his admirers.
bapyou 3 years ago
wonderful, being happy is now ignorant..
The reason it may be over for America, is that they did become lazy, claiming their work to be done by others, clamining stronger government. But by being happy...no quite opposite on that one
mammuru 3 years ago
"why do you vote for the party of bloated bureacracy, the democrats?"
Well, this is conservative idea (going on forty years old now) of calling the Democrats anything they like and getting away with it because no one challenges the inherent falsity of the statement. Cont...
bapyou 3 years ago
This is what you are taught in "Conservative school". Small government, small government. In truth, conservatives don't want to do away with government in the least. They make goverment intentionally dysfunctional (Katrina? Public schools?) so that they can privatize as much of it as they possibly can, getting rich off of the privatization. (Blackwater anyone?) Also, to finance the Iraq War, they have inccurred massive debt. Your grandchildren will still be paying China back 60 years from now.
bapyou 3 years ago
I am looking forward to government becoming once again functional under Obama. I'm not looking for hand outs, just functionality. And some form of affordable health care. Medical bills are the #1 reason for personal bankruptcy in the U.S. today.
It took Bill Clinton 8 years to bring the deficit under control. It took George the Idiot 8 more to run it back up. Spread the wealth? Hell, Geroge the Idiot has been spreading the wealth for the past 8 yrs, making the wealthy even wealthier.
bapyou 3 years ago
Ronald Reagan, the world's greatest
...union buster.
bapyou 3 years ago
help inform the ignorant. watch the money masters documentary. itnernational bankers have been in control of the world's governments for a long time. they are the only ones who have profitted from this war by the money and power they've gained; the liberties we've lost have been gained by the governments they control. they control the governments, schools, media, and church. all candidates are pro war and pro big government. it is up to we the people to inform others.
Keyman444 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Along with this tremendous opportunity, however, comes the threat of abuse. With the increase in the number of people online, a significant percentage of the country's population is exposed to an increasing number of expressions of bigotry and hate that are readily available on the Internet. Following the tragic events which occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001, the threat of violence due to hate-based ideas and values has become a pressing reality.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Internet, with its precision and speed, provides individuals with both access to information and the opportunity to reach listeners they otherwise would have been unable to reach without this medium. The Internet provides every user with the potential to become a publisher. This capability permits the content of this medium to be nearly as diverse as human thought itself.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
Reagan rules!
militia900 4 years ago 23