I think there is plenty of interest. However, looking at this water flow, Which is minor, It seems PV would be a more efficient and conventional way to do this. Of course, the PV panels get hot, and the use of the heat energy would improve overall system efficiency.
Thank you. One of the problems has been the cost of the metal hydride heat exchangers. Historically they have been very expensive, but in the last few months we have lowered this by a factor of 4 to under $5 per watt (electric). Our goal is <$0.20 per watt in large scale mass production.
ok am i the only one or did that sound insanely creepy
LiquidChem 1 year ago
This system is too expensive,
need other alaternatives...
fdoca 1 year ago
How much does it cost?
eartpronail 1 year ago
Large scale mass production for .20 cents per watt would require how much money to finance such a project?
jimmyleerealty 2 years ago
I think there is plenty of interest. However, looking at this water flow, Which is minor, It seems PV would be a more efficient and conventional way to do this. Of course, the PV panels get hot, and the use of the heat energy would improve overall system efficiency.
cujet 3 years ago
"<$0.20 per watt..."
Im sure you will get there. I must learn more about this.
Thank you
VoE
Voice0fEnergy 4 years ago
I fail to see why there is not more interest. Im pretty excited about this myself.
Regards,
VoE
Voice0fEnergy 4 years ago
Thank you. One of the problems has been the cost of the metal hydride heat exchangers. Historically they have been very expensive, but in the last few months we have lowered this by a factor of 4 to under $5 per watt (electric). Our goal is <$0.20 per watt in large scale mass production.
Ergenics 4 years ago