Tu aimes, tu détestes ? Donne ton avis ici !Tu aimes, tu détestes ? Donne ton avis ici !un soir j'ai vue un esprie . il ma dit " tu vas mourir " est il a disparue . maintenant que vous avez lu sa vous aller mourir dans 3 jours exactement sauf si vous mettez sa sur 50 video, c'est pas de moi
I love Thompson(only b/c of Die Hard II) but he says, when referring to the VP, he says "HE should be brought into....".....FRED!!! HE?? HE?? HE?? give me your trophy wife to fuc* while you rethink only men can be in power.
So McCain chose Palin, who has expertise in beauty pageants and using pretty words to avoid answering questions. She will help him to get elected, but what happens if she becomes president? I'm supposed to be okay with this because they're both "mavericks?" That's rediculous! This is as cheesy as it gets.
A vice president should be prepared to serve as presidnet, and also to function as leader of congress, and perhaps offer advice. But he SHOULD NOT have the opportunity to directly affect the policy of the United States via the executive branch outside of his role as leader of congress unless he becomes President.
-Cooperated with corporate paramilitary entities that are not accountable to the federal government, such as Blackwater.
-Established secret prisons in foreign states
America, please hear me with an open mind: We are slipping dangerously close to statism. I am not a fanatic raving about fascism or conspiracies, but I am genuinely alarmed by the size and power of our government - and you all should be too.
I think it is more important to comment on the CONTENT of a question, if one is going to comment at all, rather than bitch gripe and complain about the questions in general terms.
I have commented based on my subjective personal observations and/or opinions.
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI:
When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted web page [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
a better question would be: if you are president are you going to surround yourself with as many zionist warmongers as G Dubya did? wolfowitz,frum,fleischer,kissinger, feith, krystol,perle,chertoff, and so on.
Kissinger a war monger? Are you talking HENRY Kissinger? The winner of the Nobel PEACE prize? The man that helped open trade to China? Was a major part of the Paris Peace Accords?
I don't exactly know how it is in English, but in German it used to be the same. But know it is regarded as being unpolite and even sexist not to mention both sexes when talking about general things, even though it is time consuming. The reason of this is that otherwise it would seem that men are the normal thing and women are only some anomaly.
Why did Fred Thompson continually refer to the role of Vice President being occupied by a "he" or male? Is it to inconcievable for a woman to occupy this post? He should of used "they" and "them" instead of "he" and "him".
While it is certainly not inconceivable to have a woman as Vice President, there has not been one to date. Furthermore, "he" and the dative form "him" have been considered as gender neutral pronouns up until recently. "They" and "them" have become common neutral terms but are still not completely accepted and sound awkward to many still.
Regardless about what's right or wrong, our country has only seen male presidents and vice presidents. Perhaps if Clinton wins, our perception will change. Our country has had male only presidents and VPs since it was founded, routine brings habits.
The Vice-president should always be a part of the inner circle with the president. His main job is to take over presidency should the president be incapacitated. If he is not aware of the current situation, we are all without good leadership until he can be brought up to speed.
Ironically, Cheney actually did his job, unlike the last few VPs.
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI:
When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted web page [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
cheney is a fucking idiot, he said in 94 that if we invaded iraq it would be complete chaos, he knew then and he still decided with fucktard to invade. good decision asshole
They all sound like politicians. Saying what they think people want to hear, except Mccain and Paul. I trust Romey the least. Monday abortions are O.K., Tuesday It's wrong.
These guys had way better answers to any question any democrat got asked because democrats are faggoty fruits that talk out their ass with their head up their ass and can't see the light of day. They were also all probably dropped on their head as little babies.
It would be nice if someone asked them what they are going to do about the economies being manipulated in the U.S.
Why did Texas have in 2001 like 5 companies on the Fortune 500, and in 2005 they had the top 50 Fortune 500 companies in their state. ITS CALLED MANIPULATION OF ECONOMIES.
Thompson is weird, I don't like McCain in general, but his answer on this question was very good. The vice president is an important person in the body of government, and should be.
It is the President who is ultimately responsible. Don't attempt to shift the responsibility on the VP, regardless how strong his role is. If we continue this trend, then we'll find some nameless clerks to blaim for what we might not like.
Bill Clinton: "I supported the president when he asked for authority to stand up against weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said in May 2003, the same year he was quoted praising Bush's handling of the war. In a June 2004 article in Time magazine, Clinton also suggested that he would have acted the same way Bush did.
Dems are so sleezy. My father was a State Representative. I have first hand knowledge of how many (not all) are. We have 2 very large factories here and many went through these factories speaking lies of my father and swaying votes with strict pressure. Is this what they have to do to win?
The GOP isn't perfect, but the Dems had control of one or more houses up to the 90's for 40+ years. If they were doing such a great job, why the dramatic turnover in '94, hhmmmm?
dems are mostly hypocrites, half of them talk about all this global warming crap and most of them have electric bills twice the cost of a normal citizen themselves
Don't forget to add every Democratic candidate as well...oh, wait, the media doesn't ask them substantive questions anyway, so there's nothing to dodge...my bad, my bad.
hey jizzo, this is a neo con debate with a bunch of idiot bigoted asses obsessed with religion. leave the dems out of this one. you have plenty of time to blame every ill in the world on them when they debate.
you bitter neo cons piss me off.
damned "gay old pedophiles" know what's ahead of them brought on by their own hate of the american people. shut the hell up and take your deserved medecine!
sorry to disolution u, but while the talent might be dems, certainly those who own the networks r rich & probably neo cons.
lucky for those nets., the owners keep their hands off the day to day, unlike faus noise, who's owner dictates how & what they report & do.
it's too bad u downtroddened neo cons think the media is all liberal, in truth they probably know the neo cons more than dems r not to be trusted ex: Nixon & now Bush.
Okay...I see the word a LOT on the posts for questions but what exactly is the definition of a "Neo-Con"? I have seen it used in contradictory ways, that's why I'm asking....no one seems to have a single definition.
Only in America could somebody like Thompson even be concidered to be on this stage. What a joke and we wonder why we have idiots as leaders.....next you will see Schwarzenegger. This is so pathetic....
If you watch carefully (lol) in all of the videos you'll find that almost (not all) of the candidates do not explain HOW they will accomplish their goals
The reiterate the question, then usually add an example pertaining to the question, and/or directly attack other candidates.
I don't think that they think we are stupid, although most are...
The advent of TV and Internet have changed politics. Ex. Nixon/Kennedy debate.
These guys have 30 seconds to not only give a quick answer, but also must look good, composed, and try to remember what their writers hammered out. Sounds not easy.
@threat45 I too noticed that they all are avoiding answering the question directly.... I mean it is stupid at one point... one which has passed a videos ago.... example, here, why are they telling on what grounds they would choose a vice-president? we want to know how much power they'd give him, not how they'd choose him... answer the freaking questions you weasels!!!
The Media Can Ignore Him, The Polls can not include him but Ron Paul will be the choice when the American's votes are counted...The Internet Is a powerful force and our voices will be heard! Let Ron Paul Have His Turn!
Ron Paul For President 2008, He's For the Constitution, The others don't even know how to read it!
2 farts within 7 seconds. #t=2m30s and #t=2m37s
Mcplumpyboy 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job ... Proof ... youtube.com/watch?v=ssuAMNas1us
parish32 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tu aimes, tu détestes ? Donne ton avis ici !Tu aimes, tu détestes ? Donne ton avis ici !un soir j'ai vue un esprie . il ma dit " tu vas mourir " est il a disparue . maintenant que vous avez lu sa vous aller mourir dans 3 jours exactement sauf si vous mettez sa sur 50 video, c'est pas de moi
aquaman77310 2 years ago
thompson sounds like me when i was presenting my goverment report in the class just throwing in some terms i remembered from the book
sipan91 3 years ago
exactally mccain thats why u picked a dumbass for ur vp
strawberEfieldz4ever 3 years ago
I love Thompson(only b/c of Die Hard II) but he says, when referring to the VP, he says "HE should be brought into....".....FRED!!! HE?? HE?? HE?? give me your trophy wife to fuc* while you rethink only men can be in power.
virgopita 3 years ago
So McCain chose Palin, who has expertise in beauty pageants and using pretty words to avoid answering questions. She will help him to get elected, but what happens if she becomes president? I'm supposed to be okay with this because they're both "mavericks?" That's rediculous! This is as cheesy as it gets.
shelackula 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
nododon 4 years ago 3
I love Thompson! I wish Anderson hadn't cut off the applause that was just starting at the end of his answer.
gingergargoyle 4 years ago 3
A vice president should be prepared to serve as presidnet, and also to function as leader of congress, and perhaps offer advice. But he SHOULD NOT have the opportunity to directly affect the policy of the United States via the executive branch outside of his role as leader of congress unless he becomes President.
thecactusman17 4 years ago
maybe yall are cousins i guest u got the job then
daddybuck 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PART ONE
Romney, Guilliani, McCain, and Thompson are all dangerous candidates. They all espouse the same military-interventionist Bush doctrine, which has:
-Instigated two illegal wars of aggression in violation of international law
-Directed domestic surveillance programs in violation of the Constitution
-Permitted illegal acts of torture against the Geneva Conventions
-Disobeyed Habeas Corpus in violation of both the Constitution and Natural Law
orion9812 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
PART TWO
-Cooperated with corporate paramilitary entities that are not accountable to the federal government, such as Blackwater.
-Established secret prisons in foreign states
America, please hear me with an open mind: We are slipping dangerously close to statism. I am not a fanatic raving about fascism or conspiracies, but I am genuinely alarmed by the size and power of our government - and you all should be too.
orion9812 4 years ago 5
Another boring dull question, who cares, bad just CNN. SO far I have counted 3 questions that wasted time on this debate.
FiveCardArmy 4 years ago
Just as you have wasted EVERYONE'S time here on Youtube with your subjective personal observation.
TAMARLANE 4 years ago
The whole POINT of the comments area on Youtube is to give subjective personal obervations an/or opinions.
Ayumi649 4 years ago 4
You have your life.
And I have mine.
I think it is more important to comment on the CONTENT of a question, if one is going to comment at all, rather than bitch gripe and complain about the questions in general terms.
I have commented based on my subjective personal observations and/or opinions.
TAMARLANE 4 years ago
I felt that too five but i also found some merit in the way the Candidates responded.Any insight is better than silence!!
zappaelcrappa 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI:
When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted web page [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
fbi dot gov/ wanted/ terrorists/ terbinladen dot htm
whatreallyhappened dot com/ fiveisraelis dot html
1KingdomHeaven 4 years ago 2
what a glue horse..
taminotenor 4 years ago
a better question would be: if you are president are you going to surround yourself with as many zionist warmongers as G Dubya did? wolfowitz,frum,fleischer,kissinger, feith, krystol,perle,chertoff, and so on.
slither42 4 years ago
Kissinger a war monger? Are you talking HENRY Kissinger? The winner of the Nobel PEACE prize? The man that helped open trade to China? Was a major part of the Paris Peace Accords?
gingergargoyle 4 years ago
Fred was soo, funny, I'm for Fred or Paul, anyone but Tax Hike Mike Huckabee
American1stN4most 4 years ago 3
in the english language "he" has been used over "she", even if its a possibilty it is a woman
hrvat103 4 years ago
the times they are a changing.
I don't exactly know how it is in English, but in German it used to be the same. But know it is regarded as being unpolite and even sexist not to mention both sexes when talking about general things, even though it is time consuming. The reason of this is that otherwise it would seem that men are the normal thing and women are only some anomaly.
wildhias 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SEARCH- Giuliani: criminal or 911 hero?
LEARN THE TRUTH
budgood07 4 years ago
Why did Fred Thompson continually refer to the role of Vice President being occupied by a "he" or male? Is it to inconcievable for a woman to occupy this post? He should of used "they" and "them" instead of "he" and "him".
sjbmgrtl 4 years ago
Because Mrs. Clinton is a Stupid bitch.
qwency123 4 years ago
While it is certainly not inconceivable to have a woman as Vice President, there has not been one to date. Furthermore, "he" and the dative form "him" have been considered as gender neutral pronouns up until recently. "They" and "them" have become common neutral terms but are still not completely accepted and sound awkward to many still.
C3ntrum5ilver 4 years ago
Maybe he knows that he is going to end up running as VP himself
anwealde 4 years ago
Regardless about what's right or wrong, our country has only seen male presidents and vice presidents. Perhaps if Clinton wins, our perception will change. Our country has had male only presidents and VPs since it was founded, routine brings habits.
bojalwasix 4 years ago
The Vice-president should always be a part of the inner circle with the president. His main job is to take over presidency should the president be incapacitated. If he is not aware of the current situation, we are all without good leadership until he can be brought up to speed.
Ironically, Cheney actually did his job, unlike the last few VPs.
Goohuman 4 years ago
yah he did his job by being part of fucking this country over
bizzlebox2006 4 years ago
Are you an American?
ThunderAppeal 4 years ago
this is question 25
SWGisGay 4 years ago
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI:
When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted web page [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
fbi dot gov/ wanted/ terrorists/ terbinladen dot htm
whatreallyhappened dot com/ fiveisraelis dot html
Irish4life4 4 years ago 4
We truly are in a sad state of affairs aren't we? :(
JoeShmoe65 4 years ago
cheney is a fucking idiot, he said in 94 that if we invaded iraq it would be complete chaos, he knew then and he still decided with fucktard to invade. good decision asshole
bizzlebox2006 4 years ago
though this is a very passionately angry statement, it made me laugh.
ummmmm..............Ron Paul 08 -vote in the primaries!
Fuchsia 4 years ago
THESE QUESTIONS ARE UNCALLED FOR!
frisko29 4 years ago
not this question in particular. What's wrong with a little truth in the lives of Americans?
Fuchsia 4 years ago
i like that ad
live0utloudx3 4 years ago
They all sound like politicians. Saying what they think people want to hear, except Mccain and Paul. I trust Romey the least. Monday abortions are O.K., Tuesday It's wrong.
jonjonzero 4 years ago
I agree. McCain and Paul do not sound rehearsed, like Huckabee. But i trust Giulliani the least...
Fuchsia 4 years ago
These guys had way better answers to any question any democrat got asked because democrats are faggoty fruits that talk out their ass with their head up their ass and can't see the light of day. They were also all probably dropped on their head as little babies.
uuumdm 4 years ago
right on!
briefdawg 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It would be nice if someone asked them what they are going to do about the economies being manipulated in the U.S.
Why did Texas have in 2001 like 5 companies on the Fortune 500, and in 2005 they had the top 50 Fortune 500 companies in their state. ITS CALLED MANIPULATION OF ECONOMIES.
weeDanK 4 years ago
Thompson is weird, I don't like McCain in general, but his answer on this question was very good. The vice president is an important person in the body of government, and should be.
karaokedavid82 4 years ago 3
Go have another drink, Fred.
holdingcompany 4 years ago
It is the President who is ultimately responsible. Don't attempt to shift the responsibility on the VP, regardless how strong his role is. If we continue this trend, then we'll find some nameless clerks to blaim for what we might not like.
vvaatmsndotcom 4 years ago
Bill Clinton: "I supported the president when he asked for authority to stand up against weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said in May 2003, the same year he was quoted praising Bush's handling of the war. In a June 2004 article in Time magazine, Clinton also suggested that he would have acted the same way Bush did.
tony50195 4 years ago
How many Dem. planted questions were there?
tony50195 4 years ago
All of them.
jizzo225 4 years ago
Dems are so sleezy. My father was a State Representative. I have first hand knowledge of how many (not all) are. We have 2 very large factories here and many went through these factories speaking lies of my father and swaying votes with strict pressure. Is this what they have to do to win?
CptClutch 4 years ago
bitter, just plain bitter jizzo. you're party fucked up the last 12 years and you want more?
i know the stupid south will vote for a neo con no matter what, but the rest of the country is just tired of their lies and ineptness.
wntoply6 4 years ago
The GOP isn't perfect, but the Dems had control of one or more houses up to the 90's for 40+ years. If they were doing such a great job, why the dramatic turnover in '94, hhmmmm?
jizzo225 4 years ago
yeah jizzo, and in those 40 years there has never been as many screw ups as there were in the last 12.
give me a break. like i always say, give a neo con the stage, they lie, deny, blame it on the dems.
you're party is an embarrassment to america, you, me & america knows it.
go ahead make some stupid statement to deny it, but come nov 08, your party will be on it's dying last leg unless u start telling the truth.
wntoply6 4 years ago
dems are mostly hypocrites, half of them talk about all this global warming crap and most of them have electric bills twice the cost of a normal citizen themselves
briefdawg 4 years ago
GOP= Grumpy Old People
CaptainMarmoset 4 years ago
i hatte mccain every time he talks its like hes not answering questions hes just prmoting himself
jmeb17 4 years ago
These GOP guys are a bunch of tools.........
ForEmily23 4 years ago
You are that stupid. If you plan to elect a woman who will do anything to get power. Or a man who has NO experience what so-ever.
NordicChill 4 years ago
Fred Thompson is too fucked up on pills to even attempt answering the questions.
holdingcompany 4 years ago
Biggest Topic Dodgers:
Mitt Romney
Fred Thompson
Guliani
cart00nhero 4 years ago 3
Don't forget to add every Democratic candidate as well...oh, wait, the media doesn't ask them substantive questions anyway, so there's nothing to dodge...my bad, my bad.
jizzo225 4 years ago
hey jizzo, this is a neo con debate with a bunch of idiot bigoted asses obsessed with religion. leave the dems out of this one. you have plenty of time to blame every ill in the world on them when they debate.
you bitter neo cons piss me off.
damned "gay old pedophiles" know what's ahead of them brought on by their own hate of the american people. shut the hell up and take your deserved medecine!
wntoply6 4 years ago
thats how it is, media fed, dems own most of the tv programs thats why. just another form of propaganda
briefdawg 4 years ago
sorry to disolution u, but while the talent might be dems, certainly those who own the networks r rich & probably neo cons.
lucky for those nets., the owners keep their hands off the day to day, unlike faus noise, who's owner dictates how & what they report & do.
it's too bad u downtroddened neo cons think the media is all liberal, in truth they probably know the neo cons more than dems r not to be trusted ex: Nixon & now Bush.
wntoply6 4 years ago
Okay...I see the word a LOT on the posts for questions but what exactly is the definition of a "Neo-Con"? I have seen it used in contradictory ways, that's why I'm asking....no one seems to have a single definition.
gingergargoyle 4 years ago
Neo-Con: someone who can out debate a liberal and owns a gun
THE74MALDITO 2 years ago
Nice dodging of the questions, both of them. None actually answered.
avothecat 4 years ago
Hi. I'm Fred Thompson.
WHERE'S THE LIQUOR?!!!!!!!!
holdingcompany 4 years ago
Only in America could somebody like Thompson even be concidered to be on this stage. What a joke and we wonder why we have idiots as leaders.....next you will see Schwarzenegger. This is so pathetic....
marcusjansen239369 4 years ago
They failed to mention that Dick Cheney is actually pulling GWB's strings, not vice versa.
Asthfghl 4 years ago
If you watch carefully (lol) in all of the videos you'll find that almost (not all) of the candidates do not explain HOW they will accomplish their goals
The reiterate the question, then usually add an example pertaining to the question, and/or directly attack other candidates.
Simply amazing, do they think we are that stupid?
threat45 4 years ago 9
yep, 30 seconds is plenty of time to explain complicated solutions.
muthanature 4 years ago 4
sadly, a lot of people are. thats why we have the leaders we have today.
enchlossen1 4 years ago 3
I don't think that they think we are stupid, although most are...
The advent of TV and Internet have changed politics. Ex. Nixon/Kennedy debate.
These guys have 30 seconds to not only give a quick answer, but also must look good, composed, and try to remember what their writers hammered out. Sounds not easy.
LSMUSER 4 years ago 2
@threat45 I too noticed that they all are avoiding answering the question directly.... I mean it is stupid at one point... one which has passed a videos ago.... example, here, why are they telling on what grounds they would choose a vice-president? we want to know how much power they'd give him, not how they'd choose him... answer the freaking questions you weasels!!!
bbphnix 1 year ago
Thompson might as well have said "look i don't have any real opinions..."
us21sequence 4 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha. Thompson is the man. he did ramble a bit here though.
vanawesome 4 years ago
Cheney should be impeached. Thompson shut up you idiot.
TERRAN1212 4 years ago 12
cheney is the greatest vice president we ever had
Philip8510 4 years ago
he is the reason for all the bad things that have happened to the US
DominiqueLaFucker 4 years ago
peronsally, i think hes more well-spoken than bush. bush kinda stutters when he talks and says "um and uhs".
briefdawg 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 08! The truth is out!
whoisondrugs 4 years ago
cut it out
vsmon 4 years ago
Why not have a separate election for Vice- President, or how come they do not know who they have already picked for their own Vice-President.
ManufacturedThoughts 4 years ago
Thompson really doesn't understand the issue...he is completely off-topic for just about all of his answer.
a8le8x 4 years ago 4
The Media Can Ignore Him, The Polls can not include him but Ron Paul will be the choice when the American's votes are counted...The Internet Is a powerful force and our voices will be heard! Let Ron Paul Have His Turn!
Ron Paul For President 2008, He's For the Constitution, The others don't even know how to read it!
cathyromine 4 years ago 3