Asx best mpg in real world tests. 1.8 asx matches 2,0 NQ performance but closer to NQ mpg in real world test....see Honest john etc
Coolest in my opinion
A lot of these road tests what car etc are bs. Look at Lexus Is always gets only 3/5 in most mag tests. Recent JD survey by actual drivers gave it top of all cars made!
I was also in a position to choose between the ASX and the QQ. I have test driven them both. Exceptional drive in both of them although I thought the ASX had a more slicker feel. However at the end I went for the QQ because it has a more SUV look besides being forced by certain family constraints. I'll be getting my QQ Acenta in stunning Nightshade colour and a few chrome add-ons in about 2 weeks time and can't wait. As for the ASX it is also a great car.
Turkish market price/performance comparison: Duster is good as a 4x4 car affordable. QQ 4x4 version is too much expensive because of 2.0 dCI motor . ASX is not avaible for 4x4 and even engine is not diesel.
@KillahTrax dacia is cheap and with plastics so come on look at the ASX ...what a design both interior and exterior . go to a test drive an we'll see later which one is the best
@KillahTrax dacia is cheap and with plastics so come on look at the ASX ...what a design both interior and exterior . go to a test drive and we'll see later which one is the best
good Dacia .I am roman and like dacia daster and daewoo cielo coreea very good car i have cielo Romanie it have 11 yers and no (rugina).she is very very car and cheap piese.cielo mony chep
nissan? assembled in England with renault engine and Japanese brand? 6 months waiting for 1.5 dci with 105 hp? or 2.0 with 140 hp? no thanks! dacia? yes, it's good and cheap, equal to 1.5 dci engines qasqai ... better ... but mitsubishi ... Yes, 1.8 MIVEC 150 hp!! and instantaneous fuel consumption of 4.1 liters per 100km ... haha qasqai try to do better than this! yes i have a mitsubishi ... !
DACIA BY FAR. Cheaper to buy, cheaper to maintain, same stuff, better off-road performance. Besides, the duster was made for ppl that needed a car with good 4x4 and the dacia is great at that
@JCBlackBladeTT In the ASX, if you want all this pack you have to go to the AWD version and the highest equipment version. If you don't choose the AWD version, you don't have panoramic roof, for example. As you tell, rear camera is opcional and GPS is opcional and expensive... The 17" alloy rims are opcional too and cost 1284 €... In the QQ is included all in tekna sport version (it isn't the most expensive), like GPS, rear camera, panoramic roof, 18" alloy rims, etc etc.
@JCBlackBladeTT. There is no opcions to chose, everything is included. You can choose this version whit a 1.5 dci engine (106 HP) or 2.0 dci (150 HP) whit no need tho choose the AWD version. Please, visit mitsubishi and nissan web sites before writing fakes... So my argument isn't wrong, your argument is wrong...
...the QQ engine is more powerfull because it have 150 CV equal than ASX, but QQ have more torque 320 NM (ASX 300 Nm) and runs 0-100 in 9.5 s. (ASX in 9.7 s). If you want to pay more for a ASX because you consider that is better, ok no problem XD. I prefer my cheaper, better, more equiped and more sportive QQ. Also the ASX seems like for a 40 years old people' car... Not made for young people... Everybody happy.
@JCB... The ASX doesn't have the same beautifull sportive line than the QQ have. The QQ have particular equipment in tekna sport version like 18" rings, GPS, panoramic roof, rear camera, bluetooth, SD reader, USB reader, bizone clime, etc that if you want in a ASX, you have to pay more for the luxurious version, and some there is no possibility to have some of this elements, like a 18" ring (is not a opcion, is included in a QQ). If you want specs of the engine, you are wrong...
@flypeds The ASX have 17'' alloy rims, Panoramic roof, rear camera (opcional), GPS (opcional), USB reader, bluetooth, Rockford Fosgate premium sound system and is more powerful than de QQ because it has 150hp and 300Nm and the QQ has 105hp with 1500cc diesel engine. So, your argument is "wrong..."
The Qashqai has a Renault 2.0 DCI 150hp engine and it has a better interior. ON offroad the Duster can leave them behind having only a Renault 1.5 dci 110hp engine.
@flypeds Hola majo, p mi de los 3 pues me quedo con ASX x calidad de coche aunque de estética es similar pero me quedo el ASx x mas masculino y el motor es mas moderno y más potencia y par que el Qashqai y por cierto el Duster es el mismo motor que el Nissan de origen Renault y también el mismo sistemas de 4WD pero me quedo el ASX x relación producto/potencia y chasis Ah¡¡ apartes de los 3 mencionados para mi como todo-camino el KUGA por sus comportamiento deportiva y fiable 2.0TDCI un saludo.
Qashqai the best. Quality/price ratio is the best of three. Is the most sporty. Inside is morde atractive than ASX, more modern. At the similar equipment Mitsu is more expensive tah qasqai.
@flypeds the Qashqai is a girls car, you know that? Everybody say and so am I. The interior is poor, simple and not modern. The ASX is more expensive than the Qashqai, but is better, more powerful, more luxurious and modern.
@flypeds The front of the Qashqai is so "girly" style. Do you think about it? The ASX is sporty and powerful and is a Man's car. The Qashqai is a car that serves in order that the mothers buy things and put into the car. PLUS, why the QQ doesn't compete with the ASX?It is the QQ+2 because the QQ has no qualifications to compete with the ASX....
The comparison is a bit too forced between ASX and QQ and the Duster from the other hand. It's obviously that the first twos are better but... because there is always a "but":
1. Dacia Duster is so damn cheap for a SUV
2. Dacia Duster has superior off-road skills, due to a bigger ground clearance
3. Dacia Duster is not so technical complicated so it breaks down less often
For someone who need a cheap family car or is forced to drive to broken roads, Dacia Duster will be the winner for sure.
@shakerals Thanks my friend, but I am not so sre about its quality and duration through time! So we have to wait about another 1-2 years (more people will buy the car and people alraedy have it will have a +1-2 year expierience of this car model) to decide if finally Duster is the best choice. I want a car that I'm sure it will survive after a 10 -year usage. Sorry, if my english aren't well!
@shakerals good point of wiews,specialy the 3th one,the technical part is the main isue.take Dacia 1310 or all the other models earlyer than Logan:they do not have trichy and expensive gadgets.i know lots of people who have a model of Dacia which is still running since the early '70s.
This has been flagged as spam show
visite o fórum Português de passeios para SUV's e companhia
TTTuristico 8 hours ago
VIDEO = pictures in motion, THIS VIDEO = SHIT
FUCK YOU
gabigowriel 1 week ago
put Inna s song with Duster they ar from Rumania
reddanty 1 month ago
The interior in the QQ is very spartan and feels "cheap".
kjelltp 3 months ago
Ended up getting a Nightshade Qashqai after tossing up rather easily between that and the ASX. The ASX just felt cheaper, but it was more expensive.
1997mf878 4 months ago
QASHQAI RULES!!!!
rankion79 4 months ago
fcuk this music is so gay,,
sgdavies 5 months ago
I just ordered a Mitsubishi ASX Intense and cannot wait untill I have it
we must wait for 3 months but it is worth to me :):):):)
61franciscus 6 months ago
DACIA DUSTER :D :D
zuzzu16 6 months ago
ASX WIN ;)
KingArthurGames 8 months ago
En plus t'a pris l'ancienne qashqai les new a l'iterieur ta toute option !!
Amine84850 8 months ago
"DACIA DUSTER" is definitively looser here...
but i also have test drive from ASX, it's only sound like A6
nothing in common as only the as only the similar sounding of ASX vs A6
regarding performance, very suspected under-powering !
CoolWaterCar 8 months ago
Asx best mpg in real world tests. 1.8 asx matches 2,0 NQ performance but closer to NQ mpg in real world test....see Honest john etc
Coolest in my opinion
A lot of these road tests what car etc are bs. Look at Lexus Is always gets only 3/5 in most mag tests. Recent JD survey by actual drivers gave it top of all cars made!
athleticscoach2012 8 months ago
I was also in a position to choose between the ASX and the QQ. I have test driven them both. Exceptional drive in both of them although I thought the ASX had a more slicker feel. However at the end I went for the QQ because it has a more SUV look besides being forced by certain family constraints. I'll be getting my QQ Acenta in stunning Nightshade colour and a few chrome add-ons in about 2 weeks time and can't wait. As for the ASX it is also a great car.
iago656 8 months ago
странно, почему у кашкая остутствует "большой экран" ??? у меня есть!
999kes 10 months ago
что здесь делает фуфельный дастер?
klark700 10 months ago
Dacia Duster = BEST
gendermen 10 months ago
heý_Âný_güýs_wAnt_tó_chãt_wîth_mE
CutieoJenevaia728 11 months ago
Turkish market price/performance comparison: Duster is good as a 4x4 car affordable. QQ 4x4 version is too much expensive because of 2.0 dCI motor . ASX is not avaible for 4x4 and even engine is not diesel.
For QQ & ASX I call them as "asphalt jeeps".
moseymen 11 months ago
wrong ASX has 4x4 option on 1.8 l diesel
teutzue 10 months ago
Mitsubishi by far !! nissan is the FIAT of Japan and Asia !! lol lol
solleticara 11 months ago
check the ASX euroncap crash test,OMG they make paper SUV's,The fucking dacia is way better than that.
KillahTrax 11 months ago
@KillahTrax dacia is cheap and with plastics so come on look at the ASX ...what a design both interior and exterior . go to a test drive an we'll see later which one is the best
teutzue 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KillahTrax dacia is cheap and with plastics so come on look at the ASX ...what a design both interior and exterior . go to a test drive and we'll see later which one is the best
teutzue 10 months ago
good Dacia .I am roman and like dacia daster and daewoo cielo coreea very good car i have cielo Romanie it have 11 yers and no (rugina).she is very very car and cheap piese.cielo mony chep
DIDICU5000 1 year ago
@DIDICU5000
:))))) looooooooooooooooool
artaxerxe1 10 months ago
@DIDICU5000 your opinion is useless, you don't know how to write! pathetic...
dt012345 7 months ago
nissan? assembled in England with renault engine and Japanese brand? 6 months waiting for 1.5 dci with 105 hp? or 2.0 with 140 hp? no thanks! dacia? yes, it's good and cheap, equal to 1.5 dci engines qasqai ... better ... but mitsubishi ... Yes, 1.8 MIVEC 150 hp!! and instantaneous fuel consumption of 4.1 liters per 100km ... haha qasqai try to do better than this! yes i have a mitsubishi ... !
PedroAlves 1 year ago 2
only mitsubishi
AirTrekRus 1 year ago
In the United States nothing says bad credit like a Mitsubishi. They are what you buy when you can't get a loan even for a Kia or Hundai......
emilkarpo 1 year ago
Romanian exports of 2010 : INNA and Duster :D
toxicristi 1 year ago 23
DACIA BY FAR. Cheaper to buy, cheaper to maintain, same stuff, better off-road performance. Besides, the duster was made for ppl that needed a car with good 4x4 and the dacia is great at that
shiraq07 1 year ago 2
@JCBlackBladeTT In the ASX, if you want all this pack you have to go to the AWD version and the highest equipment version. If you don't choose the AWD version, you don't have panoramic roof, for example. As you tell, rear camera is opcional and GPS is opcional and expensive... The 17" alloy rims are opcional too and cost 1284 €... In the QQ is included all in tekna sport version (it isn't the most expensive), like GPS, rear camera, panoramic roof, 18" alloy rims, etc etc.
flypeds 1 year ago
@JCBlackBladeTT. There is no opcions to chose, everything is included. You can choose this version whit a 1.5 dci engine (106 HP) or 2.0 dci (150 HP) whit no need tho choose the AWD version. Please, visit mitsubishi and nissan web sites before writing fakes... So my argument isn't wrong, your argument is wrong...
flypeds 1 year ago
i think mitsubishi is best because it tis japanese quality etc
dueliman 1 year ago
dacia is cool too.
smoku46 1 year ago
Peter McMutry Car Blogs for articles on all compact crossovers
pm141AU2 1 year ago
tucson ix is better
marlonagalvez 1 year ago
for me hyundai tucson ix still better
marlonagalvez 1 year ago
asx.
batonzzz 1 year ago
...the QQ engine is more powerfull because it have 150 CV equal than ASX, but QQ have more torque 320 NM (ASX 300 Nm) and runs 0-100 in 9.5 s. (ASX in 9.7 s). If you want to pay more for a ASX because you consider that is better, ok no problem XD. I prefer my cheaper, better, more equiped and more sportive QQ. Also the ASX seems like for a 40 years old people' car... Not made for young people... Everybody happy.
flypeds 1 year ago
@JCB... The ASX doesn't have the same beautifull sportive line than the QQ have. The QQ have particular equipment in tekna sport version like 18" rings, GPS, panoramic roof, rear camera, bluetooth, SD reader, USB reader, bizone clime, etc that if you want in a ASX, you have to pay more for the luxurious version, and some there is no possibility to have some of this elements, like a 18" ring (is not a opcion, is included in a QQ). If you want specs of the engine, you are wrong...
flypeds 1 year ago
@flypeds thanks for giving ME information about QQ.
nabo785 1 year ago
@flypeds The ASX have 17'' alloy rims, Panoramic roof, rear camera (opcional), GPS (opcional), USB reader, bluetooth, Rockford Fosgate premium sound system and is more powerful than de QQ because it has 150hp and 300Nm and the QQ has 105hp with 1500cc diesel engine. So, your argument is "wrong..."
JCBlackBladeTT 1 year ago 8
@JCBlackBladeTT
The Qashqai has a Renault 2.0 DCI 150hp engine and it has a better interior. ON offroad the Duster can leave them behind having only a Renault 1.5 dci 110hp engine.
The Qashqai Tekna Premium is the most equiped.
Lynxtpm 1 year ago
@flypeds Hola majo, p mi de los 3 pues me quedo con ASX x calidad de coche aunque de estética es similar pero me quedo el ASx x mas masculino y el motor es mas moderno y más potencia y par que el Qashqai y por cierto el Duster es el mismo motor que el Nissan de origen Renault y también el mismo sistemas de 4WD pero me quedo el ASX x relación producto/potencia y chasis Ah¡¡ apartes de los 3 mencionados para mi como todo-camino el KUGA por sus comportamiento deportiva y fiable 2.0TDCI un saludo.
jcalcalde1 10 months ago
Qashqai the best. Quality/price ratio is the best of three. Is the most sporty. Inside is morde atractive than ASX, more modern. At the similar equipment Mitsu is more expensive tah qasqai.
flypeds 1 year ago
@flypeds the Qashqai is a girls car, you know that? Everybody say and so am I. The interior is poor, simple and not modern. The ASX is more expensive than the Qashqai, but is better, more powerful, more luxurious and modern.
JCBlackBladeTT 1 year ago
@flypeds The front of the Qashqai is so "girly" style. Do you think about it? The ASX is sporty and powerful and is a Man's car. The Qashqai is a car that serves in order that the mothers buy things and put into the car. PLUS, why the QQ doesn't compete with the ASX?It is the QQ+2 because the QQ has no qualifications to compete with the ASX....
JCBlackBladeTT 1 year ago
@flypeds Similar?! lol
JCBlackBladeTT 1 year ago
...and what's your opinion about Qashqai? I want to know cause I m gonna buy Qahqai or ASX!! Thank you very much!!!!!!
nabo785 1 year ago
@nabo785 The ASX is the best of the three. I know is the most expensive of the three, but the price justifies :D
JCBlackBladeTT 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Peter McMutry Car Blogs for articles on all compact crossovers
pm141AU2 1 year ago
The comparison is a bit too forced between ASX and QQ and the Duster from the other hand. It's obviously that the first twos are better but... because there is always a "but":
1. Dacia Duster is so damn cheap for a SUV
2. Dacia Duster has superior off-road skills, due to a bigger ground clearance
3. Dacia Duster is not so technical complicated so it breaks down less often
For someone who need a cheap family car or is forced to drive to broken roads, Dacia Duster will be the winner for sure.
shakerals 1 year ago 2
@shakerals Thanks my friend, but I am not so sre about its quality and duration through time! So we have to wait about another 1-2 years (more people will buy the car and people alraedy have it will have a +1-2 year expierience of this car model) to decide if finally Duster is the best choice. I want a car that I'm sure it will survive after a 10 -year usage. Sorry, if my english aren't well!
nabo785 1 year ago
@shakerals good point of wiews,specialy the 3th one,the technical part is the main isue.take Dacia 1310 or all the other models earlyer than Logan:they do not have trichy and expensive gadgets.i know lots of people who have a model of Dacia which is still running since the early '70s.
cristycristin3l 1 year ago
Mitsubishi is the best!!
Dacia is a poor's crossover!
alhachulha 1 year ago
@alhachulha you're absolutly right!
JCBlackBladeTT 1 year ago
dacia duster all the way because price is so good
MrBlueObsession 1 year ago 37
@MrBlueObsession I prefer the Mitsubishi. It's so cool and luxurious :)
JCBlackBladeTT 1 year ago