Howdy Lemdixon. Here's my critique of LaRouche. Socialism isn't the answer and within the first 2 min or so the speaker demonstrates how in mixing truth is how one conceals deception. Society does spring from invention all right but not from 'sharing' it. Rather it solely depends on FREE MARKETS and forces of demand. Demand, in free markets, produces competition- barring fascism competition is the engine that refines the invention(s) and makes known the public need (demand) through supply.
By 2:24 the lie really sets in the speaker denies the first 150 or more yrs of mostly successful free markets in US (exceptions: Hamilton/Federalist, Lincoln/Nationalist); then completely applies subterfuge in describing the pursuit of happiness as a national socialist sharing of industry and common property rather than the founders use of the phrase which she calls brutish property rights! lol
Nope every slip up in making free markets have been socialism or fascism (corp cronyism).
Lots of little truths but completely missing the mark on what worked in reality. Notice the lady completely skips the stellar free market experience of AIRLINES that took us into the sky but conveniently skips to the national program of NASA?
The british empire has always been a thorn in our side; testimony pertaining to the Carnegie, Rhodes, Rockefeller and other 'tax exempt' organizations prove the disloyal motive to suck the wealth out of the US- fascism IS our enemy but socialism is too.
What LaRouche is suggesting is that the socialist model is great but run and managed in house rather than by the fascist freaks that have done so for the last 100 or years. I say get rid of all these variant freaks and abominations against our constitutional republic and allow the free market sovereigns apply good ole fashioned American work ethic (if it isn't totally lost in unionized, socialist entitlement mentality) and rebuild private INDUSTRY in the US and shrink gov to its intended size.
@anyusmoon1 You say rebuild private industry so I guess you will say with the free markets. But how do you prevent the oligarchical system from moving in? The British Free Trade system destroys all markets such as the colonies and the Confederate States. USA was successful by adopting protectionism of their own markets building up the free market. So the right proportion of public infrastructure whether its railroads or power generation is needed to encourage private enterprise. Study LPAC vids
@lemdixon01 The Socialist rightly argues against fascism and oligarchies but what they hope to replace them AND the constitutional republic with is equally unappealing.
Just because the constitutional republic suffered and still suffers today from 'nationalism' and federal largess in general doesn't mean it cannot be corrected via checks and balances. The cronyism and imperialism is NOT the desired state and doesn't reflect the true free markets of capitalism.
You R absolutely correct George Washington , Thomas Jefferson , and the rest of the framers understood that..That is why they ( the founders ) set up charters of 5 10 even 20 years and if it didn't benefit the people they would'nt renew the charter. But that didn't last very long by the time the 1830's rolled around Andrew Jackson and his cronies on wall street began plans on taking the states away one by one from the people and then the cival war happened. that was the day we lost our freedom.
Howdy Lemdixon. Here's my critique of LaRouche. Socialism isn't the answer and within the first 2 min or so the speaker demonstrates how in mixing truth is how one conceals deception. Society does spring from invention all right but not from 'sharing' it. Rather it solely depends on FREE MARKETS and forces of demand. Demand, in free markets, produces competition- barring fascism competition is the engine that refines the invention(s) and makes known the public need (demand) through supply.
anyusmoon1 1 year ago
By 2:24 the lie really sets in the speaker denies the first 150 or more yrs of mostly successful free markets in US (exceptions: Hamilton/Federalist, Lincoln/Nationalist); then completely applies subterfuge in describing the pursuit of happiness as a national socialist sharing of industry and common property rather than the founders use of the phrase which she calls brutish property rights! lol
Nope every slip up in making free markets have been socialism or fascism (corp cronyism).
anyusmoon1 1 year ago
Lots of little truths but completely missing the mark on what worked in reality. Notice the lady completely skips the stellar free market experience of AIRLINES that took us into the sky but conveniently skips to the national program of NASA?
The british empire has always been a thorn in our side; testimony pertaining to the Carnegie, Rhodes, Rockefeller and other 'tax exempt' organizations prove the disloyal motive to suck the wealth out of the US- fascism IS our enemy but socialism is too.
anyusmoon1 1 year ago
What LaRouche is suggesting is that the socialist model is great but run and managed in house rather than by the fascist freaks that have done so for the last 100 or years. I say get rid of all these variant freaks and abominations against our constitutional republic and allow the free market sovereigns apply good ole fashioned American work ethic (if it isn't totally lost in unionized, socialist entitlement mentality) and rebuild private INDUSTRY in the US and shrink gov to its intended size.
anyusmoon1 1 year ago
@anyusmoon1 You say rebuild private industry so I guess you will say with the free markets. But how do you prevent the oligarchical system from moving in? The British Free Trade system destroys all markets such as the colonies and the Confederate States. USA was successful by adopting protectionism of their own markets building up the free market. So the right proportion of public infrastructure whether its railroads or power generation is needed to encourage private enterprise. Study LPAC vids
lemdixon01 1 year ago
@lemdixon01 The Socialist rightly argues against fascism and oligarchies but what they hope to replace them AND the constitutional republic with is equally unappealing.
Just because the constitutional republic suffered and still suffers today from 'nationalism' and federal largess in general doesn't mean it cannot be corrected via checks and balances. The cronyism and imperialism is NOT the desired state and doesn't reflect the true free markets of capitalism.
anyusmoon1 1 year ago
You R absolutely correct George Washington , Thomas Jefferson , and the rest of the framers understood that..That is why they ( the founders ) set up charters of 5 10 even 20 years and if it didn't benefit the people they would'nt renew the charter. But that didn't last very long by the time the 1830's rolled around Andrew Jackson and his cronies on wall street began plans on taking the states away one by one from the people and then the cival war happened. that was the day we lost our freedom.
lewis121701 8 months ago
Comment removed
anyusmoon1 1 year ago