To Tame the Wild Crocoduck: Salute to potholer54 & WildwoodClaire1

[henzay]

You're only promoting her, you do realise that right?

you critisice > people start becoming interested

interested people = promotion...

you're doing her a favour :)

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

@henzay As much as you may wish to believe this video inadvertently promotes her- and you're clearly a supporter of hers- wishful thinking does not make things so. In fact, the video interests people in evolution, potholer54's "Golden Crocoduck" series (and other work), science, free speech, the lameness and ultimate futility of creationists using DMCAs to suppress criticism, and in the facts involved. The DMCA itself shows that the attention potholer54 paid her was unwanted. So not a favor ;-)

[henzay]

@DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs

No arguments, no fights as my religion itself means peace and it teaches peace...

the verse of beating lightly is only if the other results fail and in this context beat doesnt mean batter her so that she is left broken... it is PROHIBITED for a man to hit her on the face or to break her skin or bones or to leave a mark on her skin, just a very light tap that won't cus any harm to her because as a woman myself we can go a lil crazy when a slight argument occurs

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

@henzay As to your claim of personal and religious repugnance to argumentativeness, I'd say the tenor and persistence of your three long video responses here rather overtly contradict that, and that surprises me nil. It is indeed the equivalent of saying that Islam is pro-women by disallowing leaving marks... while it OPENLY advocates beating women otherwise. Like a dolt I'd even defend you against a husband "marklessly" beating you, and you'd probably help him... because you don't fight...

[henzay]

@DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs

I aint commenting to have a big massive argument, just to explain the point...

you can't judge a religion by looking at it's people.. cus every religion has blacksheep...

when i said 'promoting' i meant that people are gonna be like okay, let's check her out then... so this aint exactly gonna stop people and yeah, she has supporters is that gonna stop them? but as i said i was here to explain a point, because i dont argue, (not that i dont kno anyfin jus aint a scholar)

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

@henzay I ain't havin a big massive argument either. However, I corrected your misinformation- which is ultimately all that potholer54 was doing regarding Amena. Your point is mistaken: when misinformation is disseminated it is most often instructive to correct it, particularly when free speech itself is at stake. This video presents her position thoroughly, so there's no need to investigate her further. Her supporters were already so, but she has also gained detractors- not quite promotion

[henzay]

@DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs

the answer you gave was rather confusing but anyhoo

my answers are not condtradictions... however, we know its the truth so thats enough for us to believe in it

and a light tap doesnt harm anyone ... talking from a womans point of veiw ... women in an argument and moving the hand away can be counted as beating lightly and just a very very light tap that won't even harm a baby but just read 'ibn kathir' the full commentry is in there :D

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

@henzay Well, "we" know a different truth than, well, yours... so that's why it's not enough to merely believe: truth claims need a higher standard than conflicting religions offer. That also goes for women's interests for which... talking from a human's point of view... it's abhorrent to condone and even advocate abusing women. Perhaps you're invested in ignoring the excesses of spousal abuse committed due to that islamic tenet, but men given the "go ahead" do worse than a "very light tap"

[henzay]

@DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs

men beating women anymore further than that light tap has nothing to do with islam but rather to do with themselves and their culture...

islam is the truth, which explains the many ppl who actually enter it... as i said go ask an imam in your mosque you'll find it...

anyone who seeks Allah (God) will surely find Him. I'm talking from experience bro, its not a force but yeah but dont judge islam by the muslims, study it ...

peace (Y)

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

@henzay Well, fortunately your peaceful religion doesn't allow for arguments... or violence... but I'll reply to your argument for legitimized domestic abuse. Any rationalization for it requires a view of women as dogs. The fact is that far worse than swats are routinely done to women under islam, and the not-so-peaceful religion lends a supernatural excuse for it. Other islamic law gives women only half the representation of men, so hardly a way to defend against "more than a tap" abuse

[sydneybb2]

Every time we view AMENAKIN we promote her. If you want to correct her, ignor her. & PotHoler54 is correct to assume she is a smart person. But she can not be a "lovely person" because she is, at heart, 100% salesperson. But by definition, salespeople are a form of evil. Just as heat is a form of energy AMENAKIN is a salesperson who preys on people to suck profits from them & at a subconscious level she undoubtedly can not make sense of the accusation she's a form of evil. This is my opinion.

[KoolTunes4Daze]

This topic is too deep for the current mind-set of most humans I've been evolving with locally. 

[bean2265]

anyway it’s not the end of the world Muslims have their views and atheists have their views. It isnt the end of the world people. There are more important issues happening in this world such as hunger and poverty. potholer and amina have a right to their opinions. What happened is what happened? its her videos so i guess she has rights over them. she apologized and no need for all these video responses no need to all be drama queens and brag on about it. Were civilized people. peace

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

@bean2265 It's not quite so benign, no. It seems Muslims are not content to simply have their "views" criticized, as demonstrated in so many cases lately: killings in Afghanistan after the threatened Qu'ran burning, death threats over the printing of a Dutch cartoon lampooning Muhammed, the murder of Theo Van Gogh after he made a movie... What Amenakin did was an overreaction to simple criticism and an affront to free speech, while potholer54 violated no copyright and, mind you, was correct

[Rockster969]

@bean2265 N0, she needed to be pulled up for her dishonesty and the fact she said she is a scientist is gonna be an albatross about her pretty neck, and we shall have our sport because humour is is our best weapon against the propagation of falsehoods and bad idea's

[dondude69]

I like this. YT also upheld a claim against WildwoodClair1's video saying it was hate speech - WTF??? At least the videos have reproduced like rabbits since then, thanks to little (insert adjective here) barbies reaction. Maybe she should stick to make-up.

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

@dondude69 Do you know how they rationalized the "hate speech" claim? Hate how? Because "dim bulb" is a darwinian slur for muslims?

[DwknsDnnttHtchnsHrrs]

Scoff on, scoff off. All part of the proper application technique of a DMCA make-over for fair use skin! And remember, you can always have "fucking more-on..." Can always find more "stupid" on YouTube ;-)

[PRIMEx420]

Scoff on, my brother! :)

[ergonomover]

Thanks for this excellent multi-mirror extravaganza!

Down with creationist censorship! (**double-face palms**)

Down with creationist stupidity. LOL@Atheistaussie covering up 54 potholes with creamy DMCA!