Added: 5 years ago
From: FrankyRP
Views: 1,090,354
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (324)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'd rather stay on youtube.

  • did anyone see the cabin break also:?

  • Lol Landing with Parking Brakes xD

  • so many sick people on this planet taking amusement out of a sad situation ..... when did empathy become out of fashion?

  • i sitin on da tolliet i sitin on da tolliet i sitin on da tolliet i sitin on da tolliet in da back da ahhhhhhhahhhhhhhhhh

  • thats how chuck norris lands his penis

  • i find this difficult to masturbate to.

  • A_TEST.

  • Chuck Norris sneezed at touch down

  • i think he zigged when he should of zagged.

  • the plane was too fast..

  • Why do some have the engines at the back of the plane?

  • i lmaoed.........

  • That's the third one this week!

  • What a noob.

  • I saw what happened, the wheels went back into the plane and that caused the planes back tail wings to collapse.

  • I think he dropped something he wasent suppose to to drop : p but idunno ><

  • I hate Delta!

  • @sigrideide04 Yeah, sure, why not!

  • hard landing! is it because of the strong wind??

  • man i just HATE it when that happens!!!

  • You are FIRED!

  • Whooops!

  • A380 CRASHED DURING LANDING

    watch?v=cLauU4pxEVY

  • @PrestigeXROm Nah, just kidding i wasn't in the plane and second that plane was a test plane no passengers or pilots, you can see the whole story on discovery channel Mayday, if i remember right.

  • hey i was in that plane, was a bit bumpy, not much got out safely :)

  • @Azuregamo Anyone dead? :( 

  • That happens when you land at a rate of -700fpm...

  • when you see all the Fsx hard landings this is what would really happen.

  • convertable!

  • that was pretty short

  • It must have been a Russian plane.

  • @squawstar Wrong

    I bet u need to read the small letters on the back of the plane

    MADE IN CHINA

  • PILOT: now for a gentle lan...WTF was that

  • poor mexicans that were being smuggled in the back

    ps im mexican

  • the plane took a crap but it was so big that it's ass fell off(imagine if that happened to you when your taking a crap)

  • i can make that EGZACT crash happen with meh lego airplane :P

  • that how a plane gets rid of a fat arse

  • Nice landing !

  • This plane farted so hard that the the ass fell off.

  • So much for the theory that the people in the back of the plane survive the crash.

  • I would be rich if I were on that plane

  • lol it was a test flight :P

  • lol imagine if someone was taking a shit in the bathrom "AYE! GIVA ME SOME PRIVACY!"

  • LMAO!!!

  • ..

     -

  • LOL

  • To set the record straight; this is an FAA certification performance landing flight test of the MD-80. I spoke personally with the FAA test pilot. He knew they were coming down fast and landed hard, but they werent aware of the wreck until they opend the cockpit door. This test is done, not to test the "strength" of the aircraft, but rather to achieve the minimum landing distance possible.

  • Hey, i swear These FAA test have piolts controlling the planes from a distance,, it is a Test the planes are controlled by a remote control, it is very unlikly that there was actually somebody in that plane.

  • shut up Flttstengr, no one fucking believes you.

  • @flttstengr not to be immature but ''cockpit'' should have another name :l

  • Loved this movie! If anyone wants an iphone check out my channel! I do giveaways!

  • no....the tail is supposed to do that, its to aid in de-pressurising prior to landing.

  • wrong!  This was a failed test

  • How the hell did the tail fell off :S

  • it's a certification test of the DC-9. They beefed up the tail after this landing

  • Flexible landing gear lol

  • I think its an emergency landing...

  • omg

  • Lol

  • Flare a bit more and approach perhaps 10-20KTS faster.

  • I think the tail fell off just a TAD too easily.......

  • that plane came in way too fast lol

  • imagine u were takin a crap and the toilet was on the back of the plane

  • ...and ur crap would be flying out at 300km/h

  • Mine would fly 400km/h

  • @SaYiPwNuHomes that will be a big ride

  • @SaYiPwNuHomes I`d be the one to do that. Lol!

  • @SaYiPwNuHomes your meant to be seated on landin so dont think that would happen

  • @SaYiPwNuHomes

    I was thinking about saying something but its to serious so nevermind...

  • @SaYiPwNuHomes That's why you are not allowed in the bogs when landing lol

  • @SaYiPwNuHomes IT was landing you not even allowed to get up on landing

  • How did the rudder come off

    ?

  • power or the landing put to much preassure to the end of plane

  • its really !!???????? 

    :S

  • Getting a tad stuffy in here, can someone please open the back door?

  • and there goes my luggage!

  • ummm you do know u cant b in the bathroom when they land a plan, so nice try

  • I have been in the the bathroom of a jet during landing. We circled the airport for 30 minutes waiting for a free runway and I couldn't hold in anymore so I ran to the bathroom. We began the descent while I was in there, so I just stayed put until we landed. It's against policy and not the safest place to be, but no one will stop you if you run fast enough and have been twitching uncontrollably for several minutes already.

  • Did the landing help push it out? LOL

  • This was a test of the airframe. After the (bad) results of this test they beefed up the tail section. Airliners are certified to take an impact of I think 700 feet per minute at touchdown.

  • Do you mean to tell me there were pilots in that thing??? They would be dead!

  • this was a test flight along time ago

  • Ya. Trying to see how slow/fast a plane could land

  • if this is a fake, it's definately a VERY well made one. if it ain't fake, i hope nobody was injured badly or even came to death. the pilot might also consider taking some extra training sessions.

  • you dont no wat this is? this is an experiment to test how well they manufacture their commercial jets and how safe they are when they crash... yes i know crashing a million dollar airplane seems rediculous but they do this to see if they will explode and what they can do to stop such dangerous explosions

  • its not fake, its a remote control test. They did a bunch of them back in the 50's and 60's, NASA especially, theres a vid on here somewere of a 707 or 747 crashing into the ground at full speed and exploding

  • There were nine nuns that went out the back on that crash May 4 1982. They all survived. Unfortunately they all were in a car accident on the way to the hospital and they all ----i can't think of a funny ending, sorry.

  • holy shit..!

  • This video kind of appears to be fake, but I believe it could be authentic. I expect the aircraft would act like that: after all it clearly came down way too hard onto the runway. But then again, wouldn't there be an explosion of some kind?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Lolz, What pilots thought when they saw it? "Hey i think we lost some thing.. the plane didnt look like that when we took off?

  • pilot: "Jim, did you notice that there's a big, blue thing on the runway behind us?"

    co-pilot: "Yep, and something tells me it isnt much good."

  • F A I L

  • Ach sag bloss...

  • ja neee

  • came down 2 fast

  • Actually the plane was falling apart and was destined to break due to shoddy maintenance. It's a good thing it happened on the ground instead of in the air.

  • What!? Shoddy Maintenance? No, this clip is from a test flight where the unmanned aircraft was supposed to land as hard as possible to test out the landing gear.

  • It wasn't a test flight dipshit. And the landing gear are supposed to break before the fuselage...  dumbass....

  • Dipshit... How... insulted, I feel. I happen to know that this particular clip is from a test landing, although not unmanned, sorry for that. The test pilot messed up a bit, and brought it down at a 17fps rate - basically a carrier landing descent rate. This is almost 3 times the 'normal' landing descent rate of 6fps used by most airlines.

    This plane (Fus. No. 909) was actually rebuilt, and was the primary test aircraft throughout the 80's and early 90's for MDC.

  • pwnt

  • who's the dipshit now

  • im sorri but it's still u...lol

  • How can I still be a dipshit ? no one was calling me a dipshit

  • no one needs to call u a dipshit ...but u still r...

  • The hell are you talking about ?

  • I'm sorry my little brother hacked in my account so sorri for anything he did...lol

  • Well its very obvious that he didnt.

    You spelled sorry the same way (sorri) wich is weird..

    and plus by saying "im sorry my little brother hacked in my account so sorri for anything he did... lol" is a instant give away if he really did you wouldnt repost onto the video, 10 year old FAIL(also it looks like you typed sorri by habit in your apology. FAIL

  • You're little bro hacked into ur account = FAIL lol

  • he didn't hack it he figured out my password and his 13 and im 15 so hush..so practicly u failed i thiink u'd get more of that word from te future

  • check the video "roberto cevallos muller" and watch the end.............this is real

  • This was actually a test to see how many 250 pound women on the plane would effect a landing..

  • Nearly there... It was, as you say, a test of a prototype aircraft. Later production aircrafts were of course made stronger in the tail-section...

  • WHOOPS!!!!

  • The reason why I'm not going 2 Florida on Thursday.

  • check the video "roberto cevallos muller" and watch the end..............this is real

  • high vertical and low horizontal speed.

  • Is this a MD-83 or MD-82

    i dunno much about airplanes but this is a mcdonnell douglas plane right?

  • MD-82

  • greaser

  • Flare!!!

  • daaaaaaaaaaaang!!!

  • fail...

  • hey man!! why do they always tell me the back of the plane is the safest?!! man!from a tuff landing this planes back just broke like a wood stick!! wth!

  • THIS WAS NOT A PLANE CRASH!

    Infact, it was a remote control DC-9 on a test to see the pressure on landing with a hard bump. these were the results...

  • lol if that's the case, the results weren't too good...

  • guess which airline is it

  • wut...lol

  • its pakistan international airline(pai)

  • what happened after that?

  • OH MY SHIZNIT!

  • No, this was a test flight and the crew where testing the strenght of the landng gear to see if how much they could take.

  • Engine stopped?

  • nooooo

  • I think this was a test to see if the planes tail could take the force of gravity when the plane is landed with little power and a high rased pitch???

  • A plane remoted controlled!

    Thats it.

  • i liked this video :)

    CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TALK TO ME P9

  • Horrendous

  • well obliviously he came down to vertically like an ass hole a 3 year old even knows that

  • no they really dont

  • that's just epicly failed

  • expensive repair.

  • I'm also sure that the rate of decent into the runway was predetermined. So the pilot didn't mess up. After a plane is engineered and testing begins, one of the first things to check is if the theoretical limits match the real limits....

  • This is a test flight of a MD-80 in 1982. The runway is at Edwards Air Force Base. There were 7 crew members on board, and the flight engineer broke his ankle.

  • lool poor guy broke his angle.

    where was he in teh aircraft?

  • this is possible? damn.

  • in the real world. everything is possible!

  • Look how that tail fell off just by the plane bouncing on the runway!

    Now if he had a jet like 175 that went into the WTC COMPLETELY WITHOUT ONE PIECE FALLING OFF this pilot would never have lost his tail!

  • they'll never let that pilot fly again. did you see the entire fuselage flex??? dude landed much too hard.

  • uhhh... that was an intentional test.  It was purposely landed that hard... without pilots.

  • fucking sweet dude!

  • I was on that flight and i survived!

  • his angle going down was too high causing too mush pressure against the wheeles forcing them to crash into the plane.

  • thats not a fuckin harley to be driven like that

  • MD 80 ?

  • b717

  • Bet that came out of his paycheck.

  • hahahaha :D vet

  • he came in way to fast and hard!

  • kinda like your boyfriend

  • im a boy fyi!!!!!

  • LOL... maybe your gay...

  • haha

  • hahahaha

  • not the best year for MD-83 sales i suppose...

  • sink rate.... SINK RA... nevermind.

  • Hahahah xD

  • Look at the fuselage. It shakes like a hot dog

  • Now that is what happens when you dont flare!!

  • I give that crash a 3, but only because the tail broke off and chased the plane.If the wing would have snapped off,or people flew all over I could have given it a higher score.

  • i give your mom 1, to shoot out a asshole like you from her pussy .if she let me fuck in her ass i could have give her higher score.

  • yes, you really sound much better then him now lol.

  • do test pilots actually land commercial planes with total engine out? if you are well within gliding distance and at high altitude will a comercial aircraft land safely without engine power with increased landing v speed and reduced flap setting? the problem with dual engine failure is there is usually not enough time to jettison fuel. what are the chances of a passenger jet surviving a water landing