Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
I was like really interested in this up until he started demonizing Palestinians, like every other "Christian" Zionist loser hack. The earlier parts were interesting, but I can't buy into it because of his pro-modern "Israel" stance.
intifadagirl 4 months ago
The difficulty I have with your theory is that fallen angels are not referred to as Sons of God. You will notice that when satan appears with the Sons of God in Job, he is not called a Son of God. Sons of God are led by God and are blameless according to Phil. 2:15 and Romans 8:18. There is yet another theory to be considered...Genetic mutation. The daughters of men were genetic mutations by men. Consider the superior intellect of those nearest creation...living so long.
trifel45 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Genesis is fiction:This is the teaching of amillenial covenant theology which is based on an allegorical interpretation of Scripture as opposed to a literal one This is the dominant teaching in most theological seminaries and has been for decades. As an example, there are 106 schools in the Christian College Coalition. Of those 106 only 5 teach a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation or that the flood was global
lizazoon 1 year ago
Id suggest everyone read the Old Testament in the Original Hebrew, and the New Testament in Greek.
In my opinion, it gives the most sound version.
FattyGrissle 2 years ago
really opened my eyes, but my bible's version words alot of the verses diffrently it makes me angry
united1500 2 years ago
get yourself a King James Bible my friend
all modern translations are watered down
jinkyfc 2 years ago
Thank you for your reply.
This man is full of contradictions. eg: Cain's desendants were godly! Then talks about God's instructions to take over Cain. The list goes on and on.
Godly men married ungodly women. Period.
cavies4ever 2 years ago
@cavies4ever Wrong.
SpaceAboveSky 4 months ago
Amen brother I agree, king james bible ftw. Many bibles have been corrupted to water down gods true word. In the book of revelation in the last chapter it warns about changing and adding words to the bible. Taking away their name from the book of life, and adding plagues to them so yeah your absolutely correct king james is the way to go.
Kelthuzad126 2 years ago
@jinkyfc NASB, ESV, NKJV are all good versions. ESV tends to be calvinistic here and there. NIV can be good for breaking things down, but you should always have two Bible versions when studying, and strongs Definitions. They're even more important.
But yeah, you can get a majority Text Bible (New King James, or King James) and Alexzandarian (NASB, ESV, NIV, New Living translation) in order of literal to thought for thought. ;)
SpaceAboveSky 4 months ago
@united1500 I think the best thing to do is to learn hebrew and greek to learn the original text of the bible
rentalcity21 1 year ago