Added: 1 year ago
From: MotorTrend
Views: 473,555
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,196)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sick.,i like the hood intake

  • can some1 please tell me if i can install these to my challenger srt8 6.1 2010.

    SMS Saleen S4 Complete Suspension System.

    SMS Stainless Steel Cat Back Exhaust System.

    i can see that they are only on 5.7 challenger what about 6.1? please some1 tell me i wanna buy one for my 6.1 !

  • If I owned a Challenger owned one I'll just go to there website and get the supercharger and that hood lol

  • best cars the bower car

  • I say in the next 10 years Dodge will have reduced the performance gap between them and others. I would really like to see dodge get back in this thing b/c all this camaro/mustang crap is getting on my nerves.

  • way over priced only 1 sec quicker mostly stock 06 rt charger

  • @lowrider94ss Yeah, definitely not a race car. Mostly a show car for the retards.

  • 570 means 570 cuis, right?

    because if yes, calculationg that 426-427 is 7.0 L...

    570 could be.... HOLY FUCK

  • @SaabyHun97 bro the 570 is just the name. this a 5.7L which is 345-350 "cuis"

  • الله يرزقني في وحده مثل ذي هههههههههههههه

  • slow

  • I would want to see the SMS Dodge Challenger 570X test. Its supposed to have the 6.4 L HEMI with the same Saleen Super Charger and have a total output of 700hp.........but for $100,000 is that even worth that kind of money?

  • SMS 570 challenger VS SRT-8 392

    0-60mph

    4.4s / 4.6s

    60-0

    113feet / 117feet

    60 000$/40 000$

    !?!?!??!!

  • Comment removed

  • intresting how ford can get 650 horsepower out of the same formula with only 100 ccs more

  • @worldofwilfred interesting how dodge can get 475 hp with no boost at all

  • this company should put a supercharger on the new 6.4 L HEMI

  • what i dont get is why they would waste their time on a 5.7 challenger when they could use the 6.1 as a starting point

  • Plus, I have at least 200 pounds of tools and shit in my trunk at all times, as well as two JL 10 inch subs.

    Every car I meet goes bye bye in the rearview. Period. Even on a bad day.

    Can't wait for my MOPAR intake. It's gonna spread that panther sound even farther.

    MMmm Bellissimo.

    Any Challenger is modern muscle. Know it.

  • Comment removed

  • No one, tests my Challenger.

    The only thing I would step aside for is a Lamborghini or Ferrari.

    The Shelby seems to be the only other car with any meat.

    The SS is all fiberglass garage sale junk.

    If I even dared to supercharge this megalodon, I'd be flicking asphalt at pedestrians.

    Every passenger in this thing already shuts their mouths or gets tossed back in their seat. I can just imagine this 570 here, Holy fuck.

    You'd be digesting your tongue.

  • All this fuckin' talk.

    I've raced all sorts of shit on the street and the highway, My stock 2012 5.7 RT will smoke any puke on the road. Especially, in garbage traffic. Especially, on the highway. And coasts like a sub during casual driving.

    That shit sticks to the road like an electronic magnet and glazes around turns when you want.

    It's all about the way you drive. If you're a lazy brained Beta male, you won't be able to handle this fucking megalithic piece of high quality engifuckineering.

  • I think I'll stick with my regular cab v10 ram srt10.

  • This car is too slow 12.8 for $65k? You can go buy both mustang gt and camaro ss go just as fast and have 2 cars.

  • So... $65,000 and 570 horsepower(is that right?) gets you the same speed as a $30k Mustang GT.

    S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-SOLD!

  • 12.8 in the 1/4 with 500hp and 500tq what a hunk of shit

  • @BASohol well you gotta think of the weight too. it weighs almost 4500-5000 lbs maybe a little less. so it's not too bad but still kinda slow for the numbers it's putting out.

  • 0:42 is Godzilla in there!

  • I like the hood, but the rest is hideous. I believe i'll stick with my good ole 6.1L naturally aspirated beast.

  • bundyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

  • if i sended sms to dodge they will send me one ?

  • love the car but hate the price

    im sticking to my 2011 camaro ss

  • luv that hood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • nice green

  • Comment removed

  • dead santa..! fuck you.

  • Still can't handle

  • fuck a BM nigga. 

  • why wouldn't you just supercharge the Srt MR SALEEN

  • what bmw m3 is 60 000 in the us ? omg

  • pppppffff he said it handles well lol

  • I'll take the mustang

  • Beautiful

    

  • Nice. But all that just to equal a stock mustang or camaro...

  • @nismofury very true.all that and with a good driver a stock 5.0 will still beat you.

  • This is freakin' awesome, especially the supercharger whine.

    I rented a stock auto R/T Classic when I was in America on holiday, and it was cool but needed more attitude in the form of noise, a proper dash and (I now know) a supercharger. =)

  • For 65 grand Saleen should have gotten that wheel hop under control. Furthermore, CARS ARE TOO DAMN EXPENSIVE THESE DAYS! I remember a time when somebody could walk into a dealership with 30 grand, brother, you had some options. Nowadays they just laugh you out the door and tell you to come back with a co-signer. That's a crying ass shame. I don't care what brand you like. Import, domestic, muscle, sports, truck or whatever. CARS ARE TOO DAMN MUCH MONEY! I build old cars these days for a reason.

  • Why 570? Why not 500? I know, I know the shelby, but 570 is kind of false advertising.

    Oh yeah, Needs more green:)

  • still way slower than a stock zo6 in every category, yes i know it's different kind of car and this car is pony muscle car and the zo6 is a sport car blah blah blah.

  • @Verification11 there's a reason why there's so much of that "blah blah blah". It's completely nonsensical to compare one car to another when they're in completely different leagues.

  • @dotZodiac not comparing...

    just saying, this tuned version of the challenger SRT8 is still slower than the zo6. FACT!

  • @Verification11 stock zo6*. 

  • @Verification11 your not suppose to compare the challenger with the corvette, that's the viper's job, GET A LIFE!

  • Comment removed

  • @Verification11 How is that not comparing? It's a tuned challenger that still cost 10 thousand dollars less then the zo6 your so fond of. On top of that have you thought about the weight difference the Challenger is a modern muscle car that weighs 4,100 pounds the whore-vette is a sports car that weighs around 3,200 pounds. Because I don't think your capable of doing the math that is 900 pounds less then the Challenger. Your comment isn't even relevant to the comment page. YOUR AN IDIOT!

  • @number1metallicafan1 OMG YOU'RE THE ONLY ONE WHO CHECK FOR CURB WEIGHT AND PRICE wow YOU'RE SOMETHING SPECIAL, dude chill the fuck out, i just said the a stock zo6 is faster.... fk OFF

  • @Verification11 FYI, I didn't have to look it up. : )

  • @number1metallicafan1 OMG u r able to estimate a curb weight a of a cretin car by just looking at it, WOW u r so GOOD.

    i bet u can tell the WHeel horse power by looking at exterior design...

    yes u did check,all the knowledge that made you make a good estimation came from checking and comparing it with other cars, or from a real life experience ( basically weighing the car yourself)

    an all aluminum zo6 2seater vs an over-sized muscle car, jee i wonder who weighs a lot more. help me plEEZ

  • @Verification11 You really are stupid aren't you? I didn't have to look up the weight and the cost of the cars to reply to your comment I already had the knowledge from previous experiences with the cars. Cars are one of my passions so I know what I'm talking about to a certain point, and you seem to act like you know a lot about cars, when I can tell you don't because you wouldn't have even made your original comment about the zo6, if you did know what your talking about.

  • @number1metallicafan1 "all the knowledge that made you make a good estimation came from checking and comparing it with other cars"

    pfffffffffffffft ok it's faster than a camaro SS are you happy now ?, can you stop calling other people idiots and stupid just cause u think you know a thing or two about cars.

    stop being so arrogant.

  • @Verification11 your so stupid, this is a supercharged version of the RT, FACT! take your troll self somewhere else.

  • @Disturbed10123 u have some nice reading skills, i said tuned version of the challenger.

    pffft!

  • id take an m3 over this any day

  • @barrinout

    m3 heap of shite

  • I thought Saleen only does fords

  • @extremepsychogamer saleen is independent, they do what they want, sorta like Shelby, Carrol Shelby did stuff with dodge in the 80's. SVT is Ford

  • so for 65,000 you get a flashy challenger that is still slower in EVERY way than a stock 5.0? come on... Saleen you can do better

  • @BumbleBeeGS and yet the Heavier/less powerfull 392 Challenger is faster in the 1/4 mile

  • THIIS

  • it sounds like a mustang cus of the supercharger

  • its sad because the 392 puts out almost the same numbers and this car is like 15 grand more expensive....if they did all the shit they did to the 5.7 on the 6.4 then it would be a monster

  • this thing is awesome....

  • slower then a mustang gt? wtf lol

  • Comment removed

  • Wow that's just pathetic. The Boss 302 naturally aspirated Stang gets to 60 in 4 flat and runs the quarter in 11's...lol..Mopar sux ass.

  • @JerryTheHeretic lol fail comment.

  • @Plaayboarding No, its the truth. You cant put a big motor in a fat bitch and say its a performer.

  • @Jessescustompcs it's a fail comment cuz eeveryone knowsit but you can make it lighter anyway by yourself and make it a perfomance car

  • @JerryTheHeretic this is a heavier car though

  • some needs to supercharge the 6.4:)

  • So many cars, so little time.

  • So basically they've thrown a huge motor into an otherwise stock Challenger. Not paying any attention to updating/improving the chassis and suspension at all?

    Don't get me wrong. I absolutely love Challengers. However, I would not pay the price for this car if it had anything less then a race chassis.  It's a waste of it's horsepower.

    Those butterflies in the hood are really cool tho ^_^

  • I want to have sex with this car. CHALLENGERS ROCK!!!

  • Well,to have this kind of numbers for 65k it's a pretty good deal

  • @peter455sd Yeah, and for $15k my Grand National wouldn't let that 570 close enough to smell my exhaust.

  • @timmiet47321 Not worth man

  • 55 K AND U STILL HAVE TO LOOK DOWN WHEN U SEE A CIVIC ON THA RED LIGHT

  • @ROTORHEADPR even if a civic outruns a rocket - it´s still a cheap, ugly civic (girl´s car). so there´s no reason to look down on "tha red light" if you´re sittin in a Challenger. besides - a civic with its piece of crap front wheel drive will hit 60 in 6 seconds at best. look up turbo civic 0-60 and you´ll find your crap boxes not hooking from a dig resulting in the same 0-60 as a slightly modified N/A civic. the stronger a civic, the slower off the line and low end acceleration.

  • does any body know what the 570 stands for

  • @powerbagle 5,7(0)L (HEMI) maybe?

  • That thing needs a camber adjustment already...

  • This almost reminds me of a HEMI Cuda, just a little bit.

  • why is it so slow...

  • For anyone thinking of buying the sms.. DONT! get the 392.

  • @Mr88Entertaiment Cause the 392 is 20K cheaper and a tad bit faster.

  • @Mr88Entertaiment well, i understand your comment , but considering that this SMS 570 is based off of the "old" '09 challenger R/T with the "old" 5.7 HEMI it is still an enormously impressive machine, of course there is the price point, but i wonder what'd happen if SMS put a hand on the latest all-new HEMI 392 with a treatment package very much like that one here!?. i'm sure it'd be beyond insane considering that the 392 already is pure brutality bone stock. anyways, greetings from germany. 

  • This is by far the coolest challenger I've seen. Drift that beast baby.

  • clearly this car is faster, this has more power than the 392 chally and that does mid 12's stock

  • hor car cant say isnt but its car you drive downtown and race mustangs and corvettes along the way from stop light to stoplight but handles light a boat the 500 hp is supernice but i like a car that handles better id take a few year older viper over it enytime or a newer porsche 911

  • Don't particular car for the car but that hood intake is S.I.C.K.

  • fuck you with the "...for this price, there's a lot better car out there.."

  • Just talk about the car you are testing. Don't need the commentary about the foreign car competition. Don't apologize for your country, or the domestic auto industry. Thank You!

  • I think everyone is forgetting that this car is from '09 and the new 392s are, well, new.

  • performance doesn't trump the stock 392 by much. me thinks motor trend has elderly people testing their cars.

  • The SRT challenger isnt much behind this SMS one...not a big difference between the two..

  • 0:42.. WTF!!

  • Send me SMS :D

  • It ain't the price sir everybody wants their car to be a standout some don't admit it

  • awesome intake is awesome

  • saleen wtf those traders

  • You're expect a better 1/4 mile time for the price you pay for this car. It pays to build a car yourself.

  • @MrSpiderNETZ That's disgusting and you're a moron.

  • Pure American art!

  • Cool ride. One question though.... When's the SMS 640 (6.4) coming out? Just saying...

  • that is wheel hop! I own several muscle cars, and I have never seen traction control make the rear housing jump like that. this car should be much faster.

  • I just want the hood on a R/T or SRT ;p

  • @iplayveryloud the 392 runs the quarter mile in 12.6 where did you get 13.0? check out all the tests and see

  • Chingon

  • 0:41 omfg

  • this car looks like it wants to kick me..

  • Grille is ugly, front bumper ugly. Wheels could be better....Blacked out would be awesome. Sounds great, looks good other than the front end. Too bad no side exhausts right before the rear wheels, that would look sick. Too expensive for something that can't handle.

  • The Mopar costs $65,000. My point was that the car SHOULD perform better for that price. I could install an FRPP blower for $6995 and put 624HP to the wheels. The Mopar is cool, but you should get more from a $65,000 car.

  • @Vbh2011 I said the exact same thing. The performance just don't match the price.

  • @travman: Obviously you are new to youTube, or you are just too stupid to do a search on the 2011 5.0 Mustang. Even my heavy ass convertible is 700lb lighter than the Mopar; and runs 12.9 STOCK! Do I need to send you the link?

  • @Vbh2011 it may be lighter ok...but given the challenger has more power then your mustang with a decent weight redution your smoked and you know it

  • Wow! That's as fast as my 5.0 Mustang was when it was stock! Now if you could get it to handle and stop as well...

  • @Vbh2011 you fucking wish dude your stupid 5.0 only would at BEST pull a high 13 you homo

  • Finally a unique body on that thing, I really like the '71 roadrunner lip, but Dodge should really try to slim this car down in the coming years, then that hemi will really do some pulling, instead of dragging 4600 pounds around like a mule.

  • Don't think so. For $50K,i could build a car that would run circles around this one.

  • not impressed i think ill port my own 5.7 heads and throw a cam in and save $64500 i want the paint though

  • lol shitty driva

  • Wow

  • that big of an engine and a supercharger? why the low power rating?

  • @FutureMarine246 stock dodge 1500's have 5.7 liter, and the hemi edition only cranks 390 hp.....so I think 500hp WITH 500 ft.lb.tq is a sweet deal

  • @rangerrunner11 sorry i thought the 570 ment 570 cubic inches

  • @FutureMarine246 it is. 570 is the motors displacement.

  • @rangerrunner11 ohh nvm my bad lol I watched the vid again and they said its a 5.7 liters not 570 cubic inches (9.3 liter) lol ok then 500 is pretty good 

  • Milehighsnake98, well said dude. Lol

  • saleen fucks up every good car

  • Plz I want this car I have a picture of it but I want the real thing. Thanks.

  • @LS7chevy That isn't wheel hop. That is electronic traction control. As annoying as it looks, it is actually quicker that way. It can also be turned off so you can burn up $800 in tires if you want!

  • Look what hes shirt says SO MANY CARS SO LITTLE TIME

  • over 4,900 lbs of pure Muscle

  • @Ganbala Actually, it's about 4300lbs with driver.

  • It sounds like a beast, but a nice honda would wipe the floor with this thing. 12.8 are you serious? I can build a 11 second honda for less than 15

  • @MOBent409 And it would still be a POS Honda. I could build an 10 second escort for less than $10k. It'd still be a POS escort.

  • why get this when the 2011 challenger 392 does 12.6 

  • @ZaGexKoaLa looks and sounds cooler

  • @ZaGexKoaLa Maybe because you want something unique. Duh!!

  • @ZaGexKoaLa Maybe because you want something unique. Duh!!

  • @ZaGexKoaLa The 2011 Chrysler vehicles are untunable at this point. To tuner means no cams, no turbochargers, all the good stuff.

  • @Michaek33KO , Yo bud im a ford guy but also love mopar's and the 2011 Dodge Challenger Drag Pak runs 9's to low 10's with a 512 C.U.I V-10

  • 0:43 ORGASM !!!

  • That supercharger setup is awesome.

  • Dear Santa......

  • that supercharger makes me happy ;)

  • For the rediculous price, who would buy this car? Don't get me wrong I like this car. Especially those "butterfly valves" that's pretty sick. Like the Paint job too and the exterior styling. The thing is though I could buy a Challenger 392 SRT-8 for less buy an aftermarket supercharger and it would produce twice the HP than this for twice as less.

  • @Jared1452 I agree with you on that.

  • so its basically a supercharged r/t?

  • why dont they just get the SRT8 instead of the R/T?

  • Ridiculously overpriced. Check out the '11 392ci (6.4L) hemi and save you a ton.

  • The SMS vs the 392 would be VERY close. Acceleration wise, they are running very similar times. Braking is nearly the same. The 392 will have a slight edge in handling due to the 2011s revised suspension, and the numbers back this up. For the money, get a 392. For the looks and exclusivity, get the SMS.

  • @MrOfcFriendly you don't make any sense. my dad drives a fuckin' hyundai!

  • This car is psychotic it scares the shit out of me

  • Классная тачка!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • they have to supercharge the 5.7L to get 500 hp? it should make that stock, damn!

  • @stupidrelaoded what kind of naturally aspirated 5.7 car manufacturer engine make 500 horsepower

    STOP acting like you know something

  • @W4TCH4W 1.) I know what I am talking about, don't attack me because you are misguided

    2.) it's not all about displacement, many cars can have 10hp per liter or more if they are high rev high enough or, if they have a superb-compression ratio. most American cars usually do not, because of lazy engineering, or to have an engine lees maintenance prone.

    3>) I don't know specifically of a 5.7L making 500hp, but it can easily be done. Hell, a Ferrari (example) make that much or more power per liter.

  • @stupidrelaoded yes but i was talking about american cars ( Lots of liters - less horses )

    You can never compare a ferrari to any muscle car

    That is like comparing Red Lobster to Burger King