The documentarians often take anything that any of the talking heads speculated about, and transformed these into declarative statements of fact. In some cases this is particularly egregious, because I strongly disagree with some of these statements and believe the facts are against some of these (say, about tyrannosaurid cranial kinesis) and they present these as facts rather than suppositions." ~Tom Holtz, who also appears on CotD
Another problem is quote mining. Matt Wedel here did an interview where he talked about the old "Tail Brain" idea that used to be endorsed but no longer is. The sacral expansions in sauropods are not unusual and have nothing to do with second brains. Unfortunately the editors of this show saw fit to cut out all of the stuff from his interview that was actually important and only leave enough for the show to make it sound like he was actually endorsing this defunct idea. Misrepresentation!
Actually, to people complaining about "how could scientists know these extinct animals behaved this way" you have a legitimate complaint, but it's not the scientists making shit up.
Sadly, many media companies are more interested in telling stories for ratings than getting the facts straight. A scientist's speculation that Parasaurolophus might be capable of infrasound is turned into "They defended against predators with sonic bullets, zounds!" by the show's non scientist writers.
Wow, it never ceases to amaze me how these paleontologists and such can speak with such certainty over the behaviors and activities of animals that died out long before them and they had never had the chance to observe in the wild. Good job guys! lol
N1: That don't mean shit. Would you assume that lions & tigers behave identically just because they are both big cats? If you observe them in the wild you can see they are considerably different. If you could only observe one and not the other you wouldn't know the entire truth about the other.
@BradNC11175 well you have a point, scientists are certainly not certain. However, we can make reasonable inferences on how they behaved. How might dinosaurs who traveled in herds behaved much like todays herd animals? Also, what would a monster wearing a suit of armor and a club on its tail possibly do with that? And what could have been the uses of having giant, sharp, two foot long teeth? From observing this one can make reasonable, albeit not certain, inferences on dinosaur behavior
@carlsm95 Your points are fair. Yes you are right, you can draw some logical conclusions by observing physical charicteristics of fossils. That naturally installed suit of armor or clubbed tail is a pretty good indicator of an what that animal's capabilities were. If your speaking of a huge animal with a mouth full of two feet long razor sharp teeth it's safe to say you wouldn't want to encounter said beasty. As far as more intricate conclusions I have to be skeptical of speculative hypotheses.
Lizards aren't actually particularly closely related to dinosaurs (or did you mean that they also survived the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous). After birds, crocodilians are most closely related to dinos (and have obviously also survived to this day).
They were the most dominant creatures on the planet for 150 Million years. That far exceeds any creatures today in terms of expanse of time, biodiversity, size, and spread over the planet.
And not to put a finer point on it, but dinosaurs are still alive today in the form of birds. There are at least 7 specific similarities that could be pointed out between dinosaurs and modern birds.
It's the story of how dinosaurs were able to be so successful. Show some respect.
It's Bakker. He was in a lot of the little dino shows I watched so often when I was a kid, and it's always cool for me to see him in new shows like this.
yeha well i was just comparing Dinosaurs with biggest animals on the earth alive .. but imagine elephant being reptile .. what its going to be then ..lol
omg Ghoust Lab isnt that that show that the houst shited him self or is that only in south park
discovery has some great shows but its not a natural science chanal enymore its more like science fiction dont get me wrong i like the shows but they feel so unreal watch nat geo bether
Since "Ghost Lab" I think that Discovery shouldn't be given the right to disguise anything as science any more, ever. So I don't believe any of this shit.
Well Ghost Lab is about the science of the paranormal, disapproving or proving the after life using science. So it's still science in it's own right. It's all about the use of science.
There is no science of something that's made up. You could call it a show about mesuring electromagnetic activity around the globe, which by the way is absolutely perfectly natural, but there is no link what so ever to ghosts, paranormal activity or any fucking thing.
I understand your reason, but it isn't science of the paranormal, it's just meaningless measurements disguised as science, which is in term disguised as paranormal activity.
What I mean is they shouldn't be taken seriously. They're giving science a bad name plus it's just plain dangerous to believe what Discovery says. And it's not like this is subjective, because science is something you can prove, and Ghost Lab proves nothing of relevance or logic.
Why feathered raptors again?
himsonli 7 months ago
CAN YOU SHUT UP?!?!! THEY'RE FREAKING DINOSAURS! I DOUBT YOU GUYS KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THEM! LEAVE THEM TO THE EXPERTS ASSHOLES!
ToritheKitty 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"For those going to watch the show, a warning:
The documentarians often take anything that any of the talking heads speculated about, and transformed these into declarative statements of fact. In some cases this is particularly egregious, because I strongly disagree with some of these statements and believe the facts are against some of these (say, about tyrannosaurid cranial kinesis) and they present these as facts rather than suppositions." ~Tom Holtz, who also appears on CotD
AarowSwift 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
Another problem is quote mining. Matt Wedel here did an interview where he talked about the old "Tail Brain" idea that used to be endorsed but no longer is. The sacral expansions in sauropods are not unusual and have nothing to do with second brains. Unfortunately the editors of this show saw fit to cut out all of the stuff from his interview that was actually important and only leave enough for the show to make it sound like he was actually endorsing this defunct idea. Misrepresentation!
AarowSwift 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually, to people complaining about "how could scientists know these extinct animals behaved this way" you have a legitimate complaint, but it's not the scientists making shit up.
Sadly, many media companies are more interested in telling stories for ratings than getting the facts straight. A scientist's speculation that Parasaurolophus might be capable of infrasound is turned into "They defended against predators with sonic bullets, zounds!" by the show's non scientist writers.
AarowSwift 2 years ago 2
Wow, it never ceases to amaze me how these paleontologists and such can speak with such certainty over the behaviors and activities of animals that died out long before them and they had never had the chance to observe in the wild. Good job guys! lol
BradNC11175 2 years ago
Its because they can compare the fossils to animals that exist TODAY... that they can see in the wild.
N1ntenOwned 2 years ago
N1: That don't mean shit. Would you assume that lions & tigers behave identically just because they are both big cats? If you observe them in the wild you can see they are considerably different. If you could only observe one and not the other you wouldn't know the entire truth about the other.
BradNC11175 2 years ago 3
@BradNC11175 well you have a point, scientists are certainly not certain. However, we can make reasonable inferences on how they behaved. How might dinosaurs who traveled in herds behaved much like todays herd animals? Also, what would a monster wearing a suit of armor and a club on its tail possibly do with that? And what could have been the uses of having giant, sharp, two foot long teeth? From observing this one can make reasonable, albeit not certain, inferences on dinosaur behavior
carlsm95 9 months ago
@carlsm95 Your points are fair. Yes you are right, you can draw some logical conclusions by observing physical charicteristics of fossils. That naturally installed suit of armor or clubbed tail is a pretty good indicator of an what that animal's capabilities were. If your speaking of a huge animal with a mouth full of two feet long razor sharp teeth it's safe to say you wouldn't want to encounter said beasty. As far as more intricate conclusions I have to be skeptical of speculative hypotheses.
BradNC11175 9 months ago
I like this version of T-rex, because is bulky like the Jurassic Park one.
Fullmetalminos 2 years ago
bfcg
MarioLuigiTwilight 2 years ago
I wish I had a pet Velociraptor.
thediremoose 2 years ago 2
both velociraptor and T-Rex for sure
robotdude14 2 years ago
Sending Lockerz invites!!! Message me.
ThisIsMrFlood 2 years ago
i'd rather watch the dinosaur train it has games and talking dinosaurs, OOoooo also songs. lulz!
7831549 2 years ago
Cool!
myownplylst 2 years ago
Too bad none of these dinosaurs can survive me in my full Soul Azure Rathalos armor with my Special Ops Gunlance+. n00bz
SySt3m 2 years ago
Can't wait for this program!!
RomanticRebel267 2 years ago
I don't see this program on the Discovery channel I watch. :(
Lightingbolt008 2 years ago
dats cause it premieres on december 6th at 8 pm
thechuckguy 2 years ago
nature's greatest success story? the're all dead .. fail to see the point ... damn american excitement bla bla
icingfeestbeest 2 years ago
Dinosaurs are still around, bro. Look up a tree sometime, or head to the pet store.
In before I get rated down by people who just don't get it.
dienlik 2 years ago 7
"Dinosaurs are still around"
True, birds
cayetanoluis 2 years ago 2
birds
Jurassicparkrules96 2 years ago
Damn it, guys, you were supposed to make me look stupid in the eyes of stupid people!
Fucking informed masses... *sulks*
dienlik 2 years ago
Lizards too
TheDrogonRider 2 years ago
"Lizards too"
Lizards aren't actually particularly closely related to dinosaurs (or did you mean that they also survived the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous). After birds, crocodilians are most closely related to dinos (and have obviously also survived to this day).
cayetanoluis 2 years ago
Thats wat I mean. They're close relatives. And I mean like gators and reptiles like that.
TheDrogonRider 2 years ago
They were the most dominant creatures on the planet for 150 Million years. That far exceeds any creatures today in terms of expanse of time, biodiversity, size, and spread over the planet.
And not to put a finer point on it, but dinosaurs are still alive today in the form of birds. There are at least 7 specific similarities that could be pointed out between dinosaurs and modern birds.
It's the story of how dinosaurs were able to be so successful. Show some respect.
TJSerabian 2 years ago 2
they're a "success story" because they roamed the Earth for roughly 180 MILLION years!!!!!!
our OWN existence has been a relative blink of an eye in comparison!
styrofoamtomato 2 years ago 3
Of course you FAIL to see the point. If you think being American has anything to do with this, then you probably fail at a lot of things.
WelcomeToCarnate 2 years ago
I love how they say "peel back skin, muscle, and bones"
that's all we have to work with anyway!!!!
the imaging technology is ADDING skin and muscle
sheesh!
therealsquaseghost 2 years ago 2
cool video. but wait...who is that guy at 0:30?? gandalf??
just kidding
Alililele 2 years ago 3
LOL
myownplylst 2 years ago
Is that Dr Bob Bakker, or Willie Nelson?
FluffyBunniesOnFire 2 years ago
I believe the correct answer is: 'Yes'
Aettaro 2 years ago
It's Bakker. He was in a lot of the little dino shows I watched so often when I was a kid, and it's always cool for me to see him in new shows like this.
crapmunky99 2 years ago
He's a very cool guy. I got The Dinosaur Heresies the year it was published. :)
SAsgarters 2 years ago
Cool.
crapmunky99 2 years ago
i kind of regretting not seeing this fascinating reptile alive .. well at least we got Elephants and whales :P
kutaro13 2 years ago 2
too bad thats not a reptile :P
MartinisLife 2 years ago
yeha well i was just comparing Dinosaurs with biggest animals on the earth alive .. but imagine elephant being reptile .. what its going to be then ..lol
kutaro13 2 years ago
the guy on this video is one of my personl friends LOL
FordMustangGTRocks 2 years ago
omg Ghoust Lab isnt that that show that the houst shited him self or is that only in south park
discovery has some great shows but its not a natural science chanal enymore its more like science fiction dont get me wrong i like the shows but they feel so unreal watch nat geo bether
JackCkiller 2 years ago
Since "Ghost Lab" I think that Discovery shouldn't be given the right to disguise anything as science any more, ever. So I don't believe any of this shit.
ChristopheBilliet 2 years ago
Well Ghost Lab is about the science of the paranormal, disapproving or proving the after life using science. So it's still science in it's own right. It's all about the use of science.
Microviper2k8 2 years ago
There is no science of something that's made up. You could call it a show about mesuring electromagnetic activity around the globe, which by the way is absolutely perfectly natural, but there is no link what so ever to ghosts, paranormal activity or any fucking thing.
I understand your reason, but it isn't science of the paranormal, it's just meaningless measurements disguised as science, which is in term disguised as paranormal activity.
ChristopheBilliet 2 years ago
Well I guess that's half true. I guess it's how you look at it.
Microviper2k8 2 years ago
Well, it may be a bit subjective, but there is no link between electromagnetism and supernatural activities (if such even exist), that's a fact. :)
ChristopheBilliet 2 years ago
its just pseudoscience...
ridingisasport 2 years ago
"right to disguise"
?
P0P357UR3 2 years ago
The right to distribute science or whatever.
What I mean is they shouldn't be taken seriously. They're giving science a bad name plus it's just plain dangerous to believe what Discovery says. And it's not like this is subjective, because science is something you can prove, and Ghost Lab proves nothing of relevance or logic.
ChristopheBilliet 2 years ago 3
Ah I see now, I couldn't read it properly the first time.
P0P357UR3 2 years ago 2