@lololololol47 People die when they get old, to hope for anything else is stupid. Can you imagine the havoc it would wreak on the planet if everyone stopped dying? Though I imagine if this were done, it would only be the insanely rich who got the treatment.
@therunningtap Have you not watched the video? Old used to be the 30's now many could live to be 100. The point is is that people get old and frail because of specific things that happen in their body as they age. People just don't get old because it naturl but because their body begins breaking down from its own failings. What havoc would it wreak? Do you not think that people would hold of having children if they knew they would have much longer lives barring accidents?
It already is happening in Europe and America. It is also beginning to happen in China and India also, where women are more free to do what they will and their health is improving. When these technologies come about would you be the one to deny people these on the basis it would wreak "havoc"?
@lololololol47 If people stopped dying then everyone would consume more, the global population wouldn't balance because no-one dies while there are births, there would be an unthinkable increase in taxes to pay for retirees' benefits, the age of retirement would go up, there would be less jobs, less money, less quality of life.
I wouldn't deny them the chance to live a good life of good length, but not to live for so long as to make life greedy.
You are making several bad assumptions. You are assuming that these technologies will come about in a vacuum where political and technological changes will not supplement advances like these.
a lot of our institutions will have to be rethought when people just start staying young and healthy. These technologies will be disruptive for our current system but that doesn't mean they shouldn't come about or they are somehow bad.
No need to shave the beard in order to look younger and fit the superficial mold or our society. I'm a woman and I can tell you that a man with a solid beard is a healthy man. A man with a good strong beard radiates wisdom and sexiness all over...
@squamish4244 well if you think about it the stuff you hear about the least are luck fucking amazing breakthroughs but their always happening so i think if he cant do it hell be very very close
I just hope most people WAKE UP!!!! and realize aging is a disease, a modern day plague that slowly consumes us, and takes the lives of over 100,000 people a day.
It isn't a good thing, diseases alike are not good things, they must be defeated.
Once they find a way to radically extend the life of mice through regenerative therapies, nolonger will the claim "aging can not be defeated" be valid.
He is pure theorist, has no experimental experience and really doesn't know what he is on about. However, he is so arrogant that to some he appears to be correct and as a result has fooled a large number of people.
He means that by the time 9 years passes, the mice they are experimenting on will have reached past the middle age timeline and they will have proof, and then they will probably begin more work with support from other sources
Hum... the bible is a manipulating story taler book, if you dont believe in science and prefer to give up at 53 than... go ahead! what I now that Dr Abrey is a scientist very respected and know what he is talking about on basis of real science and hard funded research.. and he is not the only one.Go and make your one research of what is going on before mediocre critics.
You cannot defeat the aging process. He forgets to mention the most important factor. Telomeres. The telomeres are disposable buffers blocking the ends of the chromosomes and are consumed during cell division, once these Telomeres run out the cells will stop dividing and aging/death will ensue. There is no way to lengthen life past around 120 years. The longest living person was 127. The Bible made an accurate prediction, which is fascinating to me.
@BoneThugsandAKon at the time there were no birth certificates for the person who made it to 127 so you will have to either believe it or not believe it, I don't think the person would lie about their age, people lie to make themselves seem younger, not older. Also I did not use the Bible as proof, I just said the Bible made an accurate prediction 2000 years ago as to the maximun lifespan of a human being, read my comment carefuly next time, it was a separate statement, hence the full stop.
@StarfireEKS Yeah beer will definitely make you live longer if you drink it ENOUGH,not ALOT.I think it was maximum 2liters of soft alcohol a week and it really does cure and prevent over 10-20 physical problems and diseases.But drink too much and it will reverse the effect.
@BRESHEET never fear borther. even tough there is a small risk for that, "we" will find a cure for the insanity of seeking death. and then love shell preveil for a long time. (i believe).
Not with those big dark bags under his eyes, too many long hours in the lab by the looks. He also has shocking teeth, you would think he would be making enough money to have some dental work done.
@StarfireEKS The hair looks far older than that "dark-colored" beard! Since I'm 52, I know that the beard greys long before the hair, so it would stand to reason that he paints his beard. That's the key to looking young: Dye!
@ERICWAGNERSLUCID I disagree. My father is 50 years old with a full head of grey hair but his mustache/beard grows in brown. Everyone is different my friend. Just because thats how it goes for you, doesn't mean thats how it is for everyone.
he looks older than 47, why doesn't he practice his theories on himself when he knows how to stop ageing? I think this guy is nothing more than an attention seeker, a fantast who believes his own fantasies, a quack. Even his appearance proves that he's longing for attention : the beard, long hair in a tail... yeah, I can recognize this type of persons in a blink of an eye
@bestplugins His secret is he killed of all the aging viruses that were lowering his hormones and making his cells unable to produce ATP/Coenzymes etc.
He fasts, consumes some fats, vegetables and vegetarian protein. He practices prayer, meditation (increase his theta waves & absorbs greater light energy) he practices deep pranic breathing. He obeys the 10 commandments, he defeated the 7 deadly sins (pride, envy, anger, sloth, greed, gluttony and lust), he has compassion for all of mankind,
@bestplugins Well the truth is it takes alot to live long. Look at Bernando Lapollo on youtube type in Bernando 108 year old. He is 109 now. He lives on a raw food diet (fruit and veggies) believes in chocolate, olive oil. Jeanne Clement died at 122 and 164 days... she ate 2 pounds of chocolate a week, small glass of port & 2 fags everyday and poured olive oil on all her food and body. Check out Buster martin, brown ale, red meat, smokes, eat veg/eggs, no dairy
@bestplugins I tried 90% cocoa chocolate loaded with theobromine, a cardiostimulant, feels like strong coffee, but chocolate has little caffine. Naked Chocolate: Uncovering the Astonishing Truth About the World's Greatest Food by David Wolfe and Shazzie. I tried raw chocolate and it is about 50% fat like most chocolate bars with full fat cream and cocoa butter (similar fats to beef and lamb). Cardioprotectants in choc = epicatechin & gallic acid. I found another 101 year old who loves it, lol!
@Catherine8raw by the means of a 101 year old, I meant 110 year old I found her on the internet, her secret to living long was nothing.... her daughter just said she loved her icecream, chocolate and coffee, but was never over weight. I presume aging has alot to to with insulin resistance. I have found studies that shows those living long lives ALL have lower normal blood sugars. Viruses/bacteria can also effect insulin by infecting cells, it is not just the obvious junk, it is complicated!
@darko611 Why? If we can eliminate it, it isn't a part of life anymore. It's a rather defeatist attitude to give up on a problem when we're taking little steps towards a solution everyday.
an end to aging would mean less human suffering. it would mean saving the economy hundreds of billions or trillions. As we grow old we spend far more on drugs and get far more frequent doc visits etc. If we no, WHEN we end aging and keep our bio clocks in 20-30s, we could stay healthier till we die.
100k/150k+ people die from aging and aging related diseases.
our morals tell us to save lives, why ignore the 100k? we should focus more efforts and investments on life extension progressions.
@9N8X Overpopulation and resource shortages are not really problems of life extension, they're problems of engineering. People have been crying about overpopulation since the days of the industrial revolution and it never came to pass. This is because we were smart and simply produced more than we consumed. As long as we plan for it and do things like that, it'll never be a problem.
@PsychoJosh If you think we were smart, you are either stupid, ignorant, or willfully blind. We have been increasing our use of resources at a rate that will mean they will be effectively gone long before we have a chance to develop alternatives. No one can say for sure when this will happen because there are many unpredictable factors, but the fact is that as abundant as our resources are, they ARE finite, and finite things end. There is simply no arguing that.
@tml4873 "Long before we have a chance to develop alternatives"? Oh my god please tell me you're joking, no one could possibly be as naive as you. We're ALREADY developing alternatives, thus throwing your flimsy argument out the window. Nanoscience is already focusing extensively on increasing the efficiency of solar cells, there are already plans to replace asphalt roads with solar panels, yet idiots like you constantly spout "oh we don't have solutions now so we never will". Just get lost.
@PsychoJosh Tell me, oh wise one who thinks we'll never have a problem we can't solve, what is the timeline for the implementation of these developments we're working on? Please cite the plans for the solar panel roads; it seems to me it was a prototype just a couple of weeks ago with many criticisms; now there are plans in place? I think not. Your reference to nanoscience solar panels is just as disingenuous. These things are many decades from practicality, and even then only partial solutions.
@tml4873 That's not the point, the point is you claimed there weren't alternatives when there are in fact a great many being developed. The solar cells I mentioned aren't even a fraction of the choices we will have in the future, and it doesn't matter if they're "decades away" (they're not) because peak oil is also decades away and given all the options we have it's highly likely it won't even be a problem. You can't strawman your way out of this one.
@PsychoJosh the world is already overpopulated. global warming and most economic, environmental, and political problems are caused by overpopulation. there is also the aesthetic question - even if it were possible to for instance make cities on the ocean or underground and grow food on floating platforms, why would we want to? why destroy nature completely just to have a few dozen more billion people?
@mittROMNEY666 Overpopulation is only a problem in non-developed countries, AKA ones that don't have the economic resources or education to solve their problems. It is not a problem in countries like Japan, the UK, the US, Canada, Italy, Australia, or other major economies, thus proving that it is a problem of education and not one of life extension. People have been crying about overpopulation since the days of the industrial revolution when people were JUST starting to live past 30.
@PsychoJosh and in these developed countries you listed, there is virtually no natural habitat left with the exception of canada (frozen) and austrailia (but thats just desert) , a few us national parks and deserts, mountain ranges. My question is, wouldnt it be better to manage our population levels instead of mindlessly expanding? aubrey de grey has himself said that if his technology is adopted, the birth rate will have to fall dramatically.
@mittROMNEY666 "Virtually no natural habitat"? I think you're exaggerating just a little, at least 30% of the States' landmass are natural wetlands/forests/deserts, an additional 12% are managed forest, most of it is farmland (including pasture and range) and about 7% are actually developed cities. And no, I don't really think you can justify 100,000 deaths a day by calling it "population control". That'd be like giving an erudite lecture of the pros and cons of Mussolini's mass transit system.
@PsychoJosh farmland is not natural habitat, and is not good for the environment. the amount of farmland is directly tied to population. I do not support natural death as a means of population control, I think aubrey de grey is 100% right. what i do support is a drastic reduction of population, mainly by dropping the birthrate to near zero.
comment on aubrey de gray's case of "being a computer technician" by another user, I found in a video:
AryanCrusaderXII: (1 week before this comment was published, so probably 27 of June)
(...)Audrey de Grey studied at both Cambridge and Oxford, and he also attained his doctorate in more than one field, innitially in 'Science & IT' which is at the centre of all modern research in Genetics, Biomedical Gerontology and of course Nanotechnology.
I watched a That's Impossible documentry. The actual implied release date for his technology is 2060 not 2020. I will still be alive but old. Like about 70 years of age. He is just saying that by 2020 that the public will become aware of the actions that are being taken to combat disease. Welcome to the future.
@jmario232 2020 is just when people will become aware of it. This decade is when we'll have cured it in mice, which means that it's only 15 years away at the very most following that.
It will one day happen so the real question is not whether this happen or not but to accept the treatment or decline it. I suggest that you get this cure as soon as it is released if you want to be healthy as long as you live.
@FJYardley Evolution sculpted us aswell. A 'natural' demise? Not sure that even exists anymore. Without man's intervention long ago via science, our life expectancy would be much less. Prefer that?
what about the population problems. If we have a population problem now we will have an even bigger one once this aging product is created. It is also predicted that the population will soon double. If there is such a thing the public will never know about it. Also it will most likely cause problems to humans and will be unhealthy for the human body.
@FJYardley your the idiot perhaps you prefer being cold and dead. everything that you perceive comes from you being alive.
If this goes ahead it will have innumerable benefits to society, not to mention the fact that we need a large population to populate other planets like mars in no more than 100 years. Please also remember that humans are becoming more feeble with evolution, its a process we need to slow down. Its for the best, there maybe some things to think about but its for the best.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Methuselah is the longest lived man is all HISTORY- He was the Father of Prophet Enoch and a Man who sought the true and Only God YAHWEH. Seek first the Kingdom of YAHWEH and all else shall be added unto you.. To Life!!
@lionsofisrael Yes, it seems to be a reference to that particular mythology. How clever, huh? Yes, man made technology will give us the means to attain immortality and transcendence. Guess we don't need god afterall, whew!
@MindfulFuture Man is mortal in his creation.. man is created , the wise will seek there creator the source of life. in the quest for truth. Please re consider you words, man has been going with out the True G-D YHWH this whole time since the fall of Adam in the garden ,Methuselah the longest living man , and Noah and Our Father. Life with out death is the reality for those who live upright and seek the light. Shalom
@lionsofisrael You are crazy in the head. I am informned..how exactly are we going to have a rational conversation? I'm sorry that your will is frail and you need imaginary crutches in the form of manmade concepts of god. Life without death is the reality for humans who embrace technology that's around the corner, no delusions required!
@MindfulFuture It is sad that some children do not recognize their FATHER The Almighty One who must have always existed in order for there to be life etc.
I hope for you that you will see the creation and the blessings are all a pointing us to the Great One YAH. HIS Prophets teach us in Psalms 14 "A fool Says in his heart there is no G-D."
@lionsofisrael yes, a very convenient point the men who wrot the book inserted to keep your eyes closed "don't listen to the non-believer/he will try to trick you blah blah blah'. I hope that you will see reality ye troll of your own design.
Regardless of the possibility of life after death that does not mean that I oppose immortality. I am enjoying the current life I have and I never want part with it. I also cannot stand the pain of seeing people I know suffer and I cannot stand grievances of others who are depressed from losing a loved one. I would really enjoy having all suffering in the world be brought to an end.
don't get me wrong, some religious people are pretty cool and open minded, its just the selected few that are causing problems and rubbing their BS at everyone!
also, ponder this, if the entire population of earth was made to be young indefinitely right now; it would be a complete hault in our evolutionary process. i don't think we are at a point in our human evolvement where we should just stop, we have billions more years to evolve into something even greater, humans from a billion years from now (saying we make it that far) will look back at humans today like we look back at our primitive ancestors. we've got a long road ahead as a species
Furthermore, technological and biomedical advancement are the only logical evolutionary outcome for intelligent beings, congratulations on knowing next to nothing about evolution you idiot. Once a sapient species becomes intelligent enough it would be extremely counter-productive for them to just let "nature take its course" and evolve them over billions of years, especially when they're capable of doing it much faster their own way.
how does slowing the pace of aging evolve the human genome to get to a point where we are any more advanced intellectually? it doesn't. aging isn't cancer, either, don't make that comparison. you are the one desperately trying to convince yourself through "ridiculous reasons" that aging is a bad thing. its part of living, its motivation to live now, get used to it. we're all gonna die one day, this is only slowing the inevitable. what good is living 4000 years anyways?
Aging IS a bad thing, it's the root of all disease, the main reason disease is so prevalent today is because as one gets older their bodies become more susceptible to serious damage from outside factors because it's less efficient at repairing itself. I reiterate, you are making up reasons as to why it's actually a good thing because you are still of the mind that it's inevitable and thus have to rationalize it so you can sleep at night. Death does not give life meaning, LIFE gives life meaning.
Secondly, you're committing the logical fallacy that we'd remain in our current biological state through all those years, when prevailing science doesn't find that to be plausible. At some point in those 1000 years we'll have found a way to rid ourselves of our dependence on this lone biological substrate we call our bodies, which will be accomplished through nanotechnology and mind uploading. All SENS will do is ensure we see that day.
right, ive watched 'quest for immortality' as well, good job stealing that line. but again, actually convince me of why it would be better to make it to a point where the construct of my mind would be in existence forever? and yes, death is inevitable, silly. :p
what happens when there is noone left to upkeep the technology that contains the construct of your mind? that would be in the same exact sense of the word; death.
One last thing, fuck your deathist shitheel movie "The Fountain". That's exactly the sort of media representation we need less of, rationalizing why death is actually a good thing. I can say with the utmost confidence that it is not even close to a good thing.
sucks to be you, because you like everyone before and after you will someday die...you can bet your life on it.
if i were you, i'd start spending less time on petty pipe dreams of immortality and more on learning to accept simple parts of reality (you know, like how things that begin end)
@Tartersauce101 Yes well you're not me so you and your deathist values can go fuck yourselves. If I were YOU I'd stop putting up with this awful fact and start working towards doing something about it because there's absolutely no reason that any logical human being who values knowledge, relationships and emotions should have to put up with this terrible imposition. If we look at all the times in history people like you have said "so and so will never happen", they've always been proven wrong.
second, why are you so certain that death is some "terrible imposition" or an "awful fact"?
it seems you are pretending to have knowledge that nobody can truly claim to know. If you have any factual knowledge of creation, the universe, the workings and realities of the other dimensions, the human mind (like how we store knowledge as memory), the origin of life, etc...then please write a long book or two.
@Tartersauce101 Yes, "deathist", it's not a made up term and you'd do well to look up what deathism means. It's basically a blanket term for cynics like you who dismiss a cure for aging as pie-in-the-sky nonsense, much like people in the 1800s would've said about "horseless vehicles" and aviation. You just show that you have a poor understanding of the progress we've made in regenerative medicine. We know exactly what causes aging, we're devising ways to prevent it.
@Tartersauce101 I agree with you. But note: we're not trying to prevent aging, we're lettting it happen up to a non-pathological point and then repairing it. Engineering approach remember! :)
thats all well and good, however this talk of immortality is what bothers me. old age may be delayed, but it will set in eventually. and more importantly, old age doesn't kill everyone: car accidents, plane crashes, poison foods, war, falling down the steps etc etc etc. so, i just want people to understand death is inevitable, so we should learn to accept it. fear...or hope. thats the choice as i see it :P
@Tartersauce101 You're not even paying attention to what he's talking about. Old age will NEVER "set in eventually" if he is successful. He defines aging as accumulation of damage, and this procedure seeks to do AWAY with that damage, thus our lives will continue on indefinitely, and in a youthful state no less. We will never experience the frailty and decrepitude inherent to old age.
@Tartersauce101 And with the Star Wars quote I come to the realization that I must be talking to a fucking child. Thanks for giving me a reason not to talk to you anymore.
Your a child. You used a quote from Star Wars? Anyway. He is making incredible progress in his reasearch. Did you not even read the reply to my previous comment. It will be cured in mice in this decade. What do you think will happen in the next decade. Thanks to what this brilliant man is doing I will live for billions of years. I have no fears. You have fears of being proven wrong.
I have fears of being proven wrong? thats speaks greatly of your foolishness.
I am arguing that death is inevitable. You disagree. I am already right, it is YOU who have something to prove. Your whole statement is wrong. The whole of the history of creation (billions of years) has stated that all things must come to an end. I have nothing to prove, it is you who do. btw, billions of years would drive the human mind mad.
but...what do i know, i'm just a child right? strange, i'm 21, i thought that made me an adult...but then again, you're so smart you know how to become immortal, so i suppose i should listen to you.
@Tartersauce101 billions of years wouldnt drive the human mind mad. if the entire population were to become 'mad' then there'd be no concept of mad anymore so thus your cynical argument fails if you were the only immortal person in a world of normal people then you would go mad i agree. living is inherently good and therefore living indefinately is also good. dont refer to 'history of creation' because there is no creation this world happened by accident.
please don't talk too me. i can't say it any simpler than that.
nobody this side of the grave will live forever. in 50 years, i may still be alive. if you wackjobs are as well (and perfectly youthful of course), then please, talk to me then. so you can tell me how wrong i was proven. if not, shut up.
@Tartersauce101 yes it happened by accident it wasn't created. yes living is inherently good because you take pleasure in living as perfectly as perfectly as you possibly can. apparently this generation will see immortality a possibility. anyway its the sign of an ignorant person if they would choose to live less a shorter amount of time than is possible.
as i said, when immortality is a "possibility" then you can talk. untill then, all you got is one dude swearing it "will be" in a decade or two...so untill then, shut up. you have everything left to prove.
oh, and i laugh at people like you who think you're intelligent enough to make factual claims about the creation (oh i'm sorry i mean accident) of the UNIVERSE.
@Tartersauce101 if science tries to defeat the ageing process inevitably they will. we've put men on the moon, internet e.t.c. anything is possible given time. and we're hearing that it may be possible for those who are less than 50 years old now so be gratefull. choosing to live less than the maximum time available is virtual suicide. so keep on arguing that suicide is a good thing you ignorant shit.
Living forever would be an atrocity.
therunningtap 1 week ago
@therunningtap
millions dying everday because of aging is an atrocity
lololololol47 5 days ago
@lololololol47 People die when they get old, to hope for anything else is stupid. Can you imagine the havoc it would wreak on the planet if everyone stopped dying? Though I imagine if this were done, it would only be the insanely rich who got the treatment.
therunningtap 5 days ago
@therunningtap Have you not watched the video? Old used to be the 30's now many could live to be 100. The point is is that people get old and frail because of specific things that happen in their body as they age. People just don't get old because it naturl but because their body begins breaking down from its own failings. What havoc would it wreak? Do you not think that people would hold of having children if they knew they would have much longer lives barring accidents?
lololololol47 5 days ago
@lololololol47
It already is happening in Europe and America. It is also beginning to happen in China and India also, where women are more free to do what they will and their health is improving. When these technologies come about would you be the one to deny people these on the basis it would wreak "havoc"?
lololololol47 5 days ago
@lololololol47 If people stopped dying then everyone would consume more, the global population wouldn't balance because no-one dies while there are births, there would be an unthinkable increase in taxes to pay for retirees' benefits, the age of retirement would go up, there would be less jobs, less money, less quality of life.
I wouldn't deny them the chance to live a good life of good length, but not to live for so long as to make life greedy.
therunningtap 3 days ago
@therunningtap
You are making several bad assumptions. You are assuming that these technologies will come about in a vacuum where political and technological changes will not supplement advances like these.
a lot of our institutions will have to be rethought when people just start staying young and healthy. These technologies will be disruptive for our current system but that doesn't mean they shouldn't come about or they are somehow bad.
lololololol47 3 days ago
No need to shave the beard in order to look younger and fit the superficial mold or our society. I'm a woman and I can tell you that a man with a solid beard is a healthy man. A man with a good strong beard radiates wisdom and sexiness all over...
TwistedMind6969 1 month ago
A good set of braces by a competent orthodontist would do wonders.
passingbynight 1 month ago
JESUS IS BACK!!!
behnamasid 2 months ago 2
Funny, because the lab results in mice are already coming in and it's 2011. He and his colleagues must be very excited.
Krutchtacular 2 months ago
@Krutchtacular
That's so true. The mouse results are in and it looks very promising.
Nightmonkey17 2 months ago
The beard makes him look like a kook
MissDeeCole 3 months ago
put down the joint you mentally retarded ego monkey
bluefly28 3 months ago
@bluefly28 are you high?
gothikgamer 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We must to prove to our god that we like his creation ! we need to work on this for the love of god !
fmorin4 3 months ago
He's only got eight years to fulfill that prediction. Better hurry up.
squamish4244 4 months ago
@squamish4244 well if you think about it the stuff you hear about the least are luck fucking amazing breakthroughs but their always happening so i think if he cant do it hell be very very close
pimpofdoom 3 months ago
I really love this guy, he's so convincing.
uelbek3 4 months ago
The world will end in the year 2020. See the Aimed At America 1 video to see parallels that cannot be coincidences.
vincent15641 4 months ago
Sounds like fair trade
MegaStreetmagic 4 months ago
YES!
FERRETMAN9 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Change your stupid accent ... brits are boring and get rid of your stupid so called kingdom ... and make sence 4 once idiot
illuminateddragon64 5 months ago
@illuminateddragon64 well that wasn't so nice. :(
OyonTheAdept 4 months ago
The real answer is Veganism.
ukcelticpride 6 months ago
Comment removed
dcl32 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ukcelticpride Not even close. I'd rather die right now than ever become a vegan
dcl32 6 months ago
@ukcelticpride Raw veganism!
capricious71 5 months ago
@ukcelticpride
Caloric restricted diet.
1NX9 4 months ago
I just hope most people WAKE UP!!!! and realize aging is a disease, a modern day plague that slowly consumes us, and takes the lives of over 100,000 people a day.
It isn't a good thing, diseases alike are not good things, they must be defeated.
curingaging00 6 months ago 2
Once they find a way to radically extend the life of mice through regenerative therapies, nolonger will the claim "aging can not be defeated" be valid.
curingaging00 6 months ago
hes such a oddball hahahhahaaaa
TheNYCbarbiegirl 6 months ago
Holy fuck you guys. He's more than just a beard.
vagine26 7 months ago
as a man, i had to scratch under my lip after seeing that moustache....it looks very uncomfortable
Uprising771 7 months ago
/watch?v=l0QagRzz7n8&feature=player_detailpage#t=248s
YaBaDji 7 months ago
Comment removed
YaBaDji 7 months ago
Yep, that's why i always say:
LONG LIVE THE MICE!
TheDarkFenix 8 months ago
Rev. 9:6 During those days men will seek death, but will not find it; they will long to die, but death will elude them.
tigoldbitties1 8 months ago
Truly the only thing to ever kill this immortal God of man will be the breaking of the neck from that even more Godlike beard.
Charlesperalo 8 months ago
He is pure theorist, has no experimental experience and really doesn't know what he is on about. However, he is so arrogant that to some he appears to be correct and as a result has fooled a large number of people.
mtbers 9 months ago
He means that by the time 9 years passes, the mice they are experimenting on will have reached past the middle age timeline and they will have proof, and then they will probably begin more work with support from other sources
DannyPolDiaz 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
finally, Death will prove it own taste
zoveia 9 months ago
Comment removed
zoveia 9 months ago
OMG 0:18 on drugs
SKarmytech 9 months ago
Comment removed
SKarmytech 9 months ago
I know what product he is talking about used on the mice...
MicahLeviClark 10 months ago
He looks amazingly like a hippie brit jesus version of Edward Norton...least that's who should play Aubrey in the movie!
MsTessMalone 10 months ago 2
i wanted to write shall not "shell" :P
mzoltan14 10 months ago
Keep Us?..... you mean the Elite will have this tech, not us workers.
DaMoose85 11 months ago
Hum... the bible is a manipulating story taler book, if you dont believe in science and prefer to give up at 53 than... go ahead! what I now that Dr Abrey is a scientist very respected and know what he is talking about on basis of real science and hard funded research.. and he is not the only one.Go and make your one research of what is going on before mediocre critics.
edasilva007 11 months ago
@b0rg51r
exactly, people are so stupid and narrow minded.
geniusin1 11 months ago
You cannot defeat the aging process. He forgets to mention the most important factor. Telomeres. The telomeres are disposable buffers blocking the ends of the chromosomes and are consumed during cell division, once these Telomeres run out the cells will stop dividing and aging/death will ensue. There is no way to lengthen life past around 120 years. The longest living person was 127. The Bible made an accurate prediction, which is fascinating to me.
Christopher1987uk 1 year ago
@Christopher1987uk
No the longest living person lived up to 122 years, with proof. Show us proof that someone lived to 127. The bible isnt proof.
BoneThugsandAKon 1 year ago
@BoneThugsandAKon at the time there were no birth certificates for the person who made it to 127 so you will have to either believe it or not believe it, I don't think the person would lie about their age, people lie to make themselves seem younger, not older. Also I did not use the Bible as proof, I just said the Bible made an accurate prediction 2000 years ago as to the maximun lifespan of a human being, read my comment carefuly next time, it was a separate statement, hence the full stop.
Christopher1987uk 1 year ago
Aubrey, go go go. Take as much cash as you can bro. I'm right behind you. I want to make my fortune by conning the rich too. Can we hook up?
smrndoff 1 year ago
@smrndoff
you're an idiot.
geniusin1 11 months ago
Bla bla ...yackety yackety
luckyfire3 1 year ago
@StarfireEKS Yeah beer will definitely make you live longer if you drink it ENOUGH,not ALOT.I think it was maximum 2liters of soft alcohol a week and it really does cure and prevent over 10-20 physical problems and diseases.But drink too much and it will reverse the effect.
kohversohver 1 year ago
"The Methuselah Foundation"??
~ Of all the names to chose from!
BTW. After Methuselah died, Judgement came!!
Man never learns, from one golden age to the next!
They'll find the cure for aging, the cure will spread like a virus!
Revelation 9:6
In those days men will seek death and will not find it;
they will desire to die, and death will flee from them.
BRESHEET 1 year ago
@BRESHEET never fear borther. even tough there is a small risk for that, "we" will find a cure for the insanity of seeking death. and then love shell preveil for a long time. (i believe).
mzoltan14 10 months ago
@BRESHEET Yet you advocate for an eternity of worshipping a cruel god.
Keitaro2011 9 months ago
Hmm? He looks like Methusala...
just kidding, I really admire what they're doing.
FeelingFreshSon 1 year ago
Shave the beard and he'd look in his 20s
beau0fletcher 1 year ago 38
@beau0fletcher very true.
GmtC1979 1 year ago
@beau0fletcher
Not with those big dark bags under his eyes, too many long hours in the lab by the looks. He also has shocking teeth, you would think he would be making enough money to have some dental work done.
petecabrina 1 year ago 2
@beau0fletcher
Lmao no he would not.
BoneThugsandAKon 10 months ago
@beau0fletcher noo way. He doesnt sleep, dark circles crow feet.
dmit1703 5 months ago
@beau0fletcher shave his beard and he'd still have hideous teeth and talk like Sylvester the Cat.
medexamtoolsdotcom 2 weeks ago
Dude,
he looks great for 47!
ERICWAGNERSLUCID 1 year ago
@ERICWAGNERSLUCID and he always has a beer in his hands...maybe thats the secret to eternal youth, grow a beard and drink alot of beer.
StarfireEKS 1 year ago
@StarfireEKS The hair looks far older than that "dark-colored" beard! Since I'm 52, I know that the beard greys long before the hair, so it would stand to reason that he paints his beard. That's the key to looking young: Dye!
ERICWAGNERSLUCID 1 year ago 15
@ERICWAGNERSLUCID I disagree. My father is 50 years old with a full head of grey hair but his mustache/beard grows in brown. Everyone is different my friend. Just because thats how it goes for you, doesn't mean thats how it is for everyone.
xlostxmemoryx01x 7 months ago
@ERICWAGNERSLUCID I have grey hair on my head and no grey in my beard...
midu914 3 months ago
he looks older than 47, why doesn't he practice his theories on himself when he knows how to stop ageing? I think this guy is nothing more than an attention seeker, a fantast who believes his own fantasies, a quack. Even his appearance proves that he's longing for attention : the beard, long hair in a tail... yeah, I can recognize this type of persons in a blink of an eye
Nightwithe 1 year ago
i would say he is a 32 years old looking like a 45 years old... how old is he?
bestplugins 1 year ago
@bestplugins he is actually 100 years old!!!!
Catherine8raw 1 year ago
@Catherine8raw hehe, then i want his secret, lol.
bestplugins 1 year ago
@bestplugins His secret is he killed of all the aging viruses that were lowering his hormones and making his cells unable to produce ATP/Coenzymes etc.
He fasts, consumes some fats, vegetables and vegetarian protein. He practices prayer, meditation (increase his theta waves & absorbs greater light energy) he practices deep pranic breathing. He obeys the 10 commandments, he defeated the 7 deadly sins (pride, envy, anger, sloth, greed, gluttony and lust), he has compassion for all of mankind,
Catherine8raw 1 year ago
@bestplugins he consumes chocolate, olive oil, garlic, cinnamon and cayenne pepper.
Catherine8raw 1 year ago
@Catherine8raw maybe thats why he looks totally unhealthy (or maybe he is healthy, but his eyes are this way because of too much weed...
bestplugins 1 year ago
@bestplugins Well the truth is it takes alot to live long. Look at Bernando Lapollo on youtube type in Bernando 108 year old. He is 109 now. He lives on a raw food diet (fruit and veggies) believes in chocolate, olive oil. Jeanne Clement died at 122 and 164 days... she ate 2 pounds of chocolate a week, small glass of port & 2 fags everyday and poured olive oil on all her food and body. Check out Buster martin, brown ale, red meat, smokes, eat veg/eggs, no dairy
Catherine8raw 1 year ago
@Catherine8raw i will try some of those (specially chocolate).
bestplugins 1 year ago
@bestplugins I tried 90% cocoa chocolate loaded with theobromine, a cardiostimulant, feels like strong coffee, but chocolate has little caffine. Naked Chocolate: Uncovering the Astonishing Truth About the World's Greatest Food by David Wolfe and Shazzie. I tried raw chocolate and it is about 50% fat like most chocolate bars with full fat cream and cocoa butter (similar fats to beef and lamb). Cardioprotectants in choc = epicatechin & gallic acid. I found another 101 year old who loves it, lol!
Catherine8raw 1 year ago
@Catherine8raw by the means of a 101 year old, I meant 110 year old I found her on the internet, her secret to living long was nothing.... her daughter just said she loved her icecream, chocolate and coffee, but was never over weight. I presume aging has alot to to with insulin resistance. I have found studies that shows those living long lives ALL have lower normal blood sugars. Viruses/bacteria can also effect insulin by infecting cells, it is not just the obvious junk, it is complicated!
Catherine8raw 1 year ago
@bestplugins He's 47. Your guess was pretty spot on.
noxure 1 year ago
I want to grow a beard like this man. God damn it! I want a beard like that and talk all kinds of sciencey stuff!
FractalBolt 1 year ago
Comment removed
darko611 1 year ago
@darko611 what qualifies you to determine that? stop pulling shit out of your ass and do some research.
mittROMNEY666 1 year ago
@darko611 Why? If we can eliminate it, it isn't a part of life anymore. It's a rather defeatist attitude to give up on a problem when we're taking little steps towards a solution everyday.
hmspinaforethisisspa 1 year ago
@FJYardley
I wasn't talking about De Grey you idiot. I was talking about you. You are the ass. De Grey is awsome.
jmario232 1 year ago
I really hope so! Being young is awesome!
max10wonderboy 1 year ago
We may as well believe that the Earth is 6000 years old, fairies live at the end of the garden, and werewolves roam on full moon lit nights.
ProbableFiction 1 year ago
I say yes. I would love to life a healthy young life all my life and chose to die when I want to. Since all we have in this universe is choise.
DurexDurpaneu2 1 year ago
an end to aging would mean less human suffering. it would mean saving the economy hundreds of billions or trillions. As we grow old we spend far more on drugs and get far more frequent doc visits etc. If we no, WHEN we end aging and keep our bio clocks in 20-30s, we could stay healthier till we die.
100k/150k+ people die from aging and aging related diseases.
our morals tell us to save lives, why ignore the 100k? we should focus more efforts and investments on life extension progressions.
curingaging00 1 year ago
@curingaging00
Humans while we most certainly
should live longer than the 80 or so years we
do should NOT live forever. There is overpopulation,
resources,etc. and it could lead to the extinction of the
human race.
9N8X 1 year ago
@9N8X Overpopulation and resource shortages are not really problems of life extension, they're problems of engineering. People have been crying about overpopulation since the days of the industrial revolution and it never came to pass. This is because we were smart and simply produced more than we consumed. As long as we plan for it and do things like that, it'll never be a problem.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh If you think we were smart, you are either stupid, ignorant, or willfully blind. We have been increasing our use of resources at a rate that will mean they will be effectively gone long before we have a chance to develop alternatives. No one can say for sure when this will happen because there are many unpredictable factors, but the fact is that as abundant as our resources are, they ARE finite, and finite things end. There is simply no arguing that.
tml4873 1 year ago
@tml4873 "Long before we have a chance to develop alternatives"? Oh my god please tell me you're joking, no one could possibly be as naive as you. We're ALREADY developing alternatives, thus throwing your flimsy argument out the window. Nanoscience is already focusing extensively on increasing the efficiency of solar cells, there are already plans to replace asphalt roads with solar panels, yet idiots like you constantly spout "oh we don't have solutions now so we never will". Just get lost.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh Tell me, oh wise one who thinks we'll never have a problem we can't solve, what is the timeline for the implementation of these developments we're working on? Please cite the plans for the solar panel roads; it seems to me it was a prototype just a couple of weeks ago with many criticisms; now there are plans in place? I think not. Your reference to nanoscience solar panels is just as disingenuous. These things are many decades from practicality, and even then only partial solutions.
tml4873 1 year ago
@tml4873 That's not the point, the point is you claimed there weren't alternatives when there are in fact a great many being developed. The solar cells I mentioned aren't even a fraction of the choices we will have in the future, and it doesn't matter if they're "decades away" (they're not) because peak oil is also decades away and given all the options we have it's highly likely it won't even be a problem. You can't strawman your way out of this one.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh the world is already overpopulated. global warming and most economic, environmental, and political problems are caused by overpopulation. there is also the aesthetic question - even if it were possible to for instance make cities on the ocean or underground and grow food on floating platforms, why would we want to? why destroy nature completely just to have a few dozen more billion people?
mittROMNEY666 1 year ago
@mittROMNEY666 Overpopulation is only a problem in non-developed countries, AKA ones that don't have the economic resources or education to solve their problems. It is not a problem in countries like Japan, the UK, the US, Canada, Italy, Australia, or other major economies, thus proving that it is a problem of education and not one of life extension. People have been crying about overpopulation since the days of the industrial revolution when people were JUST starting to live past 30.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh and in these developed countries you listed, there is virtually no natural habitat left with the exception of canada (frozen) and austrailia (but thats just desert) , a few us national parks and deserts, mountain ranges. My question is, wouldnt it be better to manage our population levels instead of mindlessly expanding? aubrey de grey has himself said that if his technology is adopted, the birth rate will have to fall dramatically.
mittROMNEY666 1 year ago
@mittROMNEY666 "Virtually no natural habitat"? I think you're exaggerating just a little, at least 30% of the States' landmass are natural wetlands/forests/deserts, an additional 12% are managed forest, most of it is farmland (including pasture and range) and about 7% are actually developed cities. And no, I don't really think you can justify 100,000 deaths a day by calling it "population control". That'd be like giving an erudite lecture of the pros and cons of Mussolini's mass transit system.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh farmland is not natural habitat, and is not good for the environment. the amount of farmland is directly tied to population. I do not support natural death as a means of population control, I think aubrey de grey is 100% right. what i do support is a drastic reduction of population, mainly by dropping the birthrate to near zero.
mittROMNEY666 1 year ago
If only I had been born 200 years from now.
anzwertree 1 year ago
@anzwertree if only ud shut up idiot
cpretartedmuch 1 year ago
@FJYardley
ass
jmario232 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
comment on aubrey de gray's case of "being a computer technician" by another user, I found in a video:
AryanCrusaderXII: (1 week before this comment was published, so probably 27 of June)
(...)Audrey de Grey studied at both Cambridge and Oxford, and he also attained his doctorate in more than one field, innitially in 'Science & IT' which is at the centre of all modern research in Genetics, Biomedical Gerontology and of course Nanotechnology.
P.S.: original: /watch?v=UC_DMxxa4sM&feature=related
uhuyo 1 year ago
oh god no, i hope they dont come up with this until after my parents are dead. i dont want them living forever that would be a nightmare
matchbox555 1 year ago
I watched a That's Impossible documentry. The actual implied release date for his technology is 2060 not 2020. I will still be alive but old. Like about 70 years of age. He is just saying that by 2020 that the public will become aware of the actions that are being taken to combat disease. Welcome to the future.
jmario232 1 year ago
@jmario232 2020 is just when people will become aware of it. This decade is when we'll have cured it in mice, which means that it's only 15 years away at the very most following that.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh good positive thinking. where did you get that info from?
maxgunn555 1 year ago
This guy trys to play god, dont you wanna come to heaven when you die? why would you like to live forever?
Ironandtheshizzelz 1 year ago
@Ironandtheshizzelz I'm happy for you to die and for me to live forever; I don't see that we have any conflict of interest.
looni3 1 year ago
@looni3
you wont live forever buddy, the immortality will never be created in our life time. enjoy dying
Ironandtheshizzelz 1 year ago
@Ironandtheshizzelz
You too, bro. Keep your fingers crossed for that after-life.
looni3 1 year ago
@Ironandtheshizzelz You're an idiot.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@Ironandtheshizzelz
Fuck you.
jmario232 1 year ago
@jmario232
fuck u too whore
Ironandtheshizzelz 1 year ago
@Ironandtheshizzelz
Fuck you twice.
jmario232 1 year ago
@Ironandtheshizzelz
It will one day happen so the real question is not whether this happen or not but to accept the treatment or decline it. I suggest that you get this cure as soon as it is released if you want to be healthy as long as you live.
jmario232 1 year ago
@Ironandtheshizzelz
I have plenty of reasons why. So many that I would put them if it wasn't for Youtube's stupid character limit.
jmario232 1 year ago
in 2020, no one will breath because our air will be to polluted.
oshyria 1 year ago
@oshyria too polluted with what?
looni3 1 year ago
@looni3 with difficulty, specifically materials that the body has difficulty breaking down.
IcarusFlying 1 year ago
We don't need to age past 22.
BoneThugsandAKon 1 year ago
@FJYardley Evolution sculpted us aswell. A 'natural' demise? Not sure that even exists anymore. Without man's intervention long ago via science, our life expectancy would be much less. Prefer that?
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
I predict he won't cut his beard.
micikas 1 year ago
what about the population problems. If we have a population problem now we will have an even bigger one once this aging product is created. It is also predicted that the population will soon double. If there is such a thing the public will never know about it. Also it will most likely cause problems to humans and will be unhealthy for the human body.
selca14 1 year ago
@FJYardley your the idiot perhaps you prefer being cold and dead. everything that you perceive comes from you being alive.
If this goes ahead it will have innumerable benefits to society, not to mention the fact that we need a large population to populate other planets like mars in no more than 100 years. Please also remember that humans are becoming more feeble with evolution, its a process we need to slow down. Its for the best, there maybe some things to think about but its for the best.
hintoftheday 1 year ago
I want to be chronology and biology young. you cant have one with out the other. As I said be for I want to be 200 years old but look 18 years old.
QDOMA 1 year ago
@QDOMA If you are 200 years old, you are 200 years old chronologically :)
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Methuselah is the longest lived man is all HISTORY- He was the Father of Prophet Enoch and a Man who sought the true and Only God YAHWEH. Seek first the Kingdom of YAHWEH and all else shall be added unto you.. To Life!!
lionsofisrael 1 year ago
@lionsofisrael Yes, it seems to be a reference to that particular mythology. How clever, huh? Yes, man made technology will give us the means to attain immortality and transcendence. Guess we don't need god afterall, whew!
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
@MindfulFuture Man is mortal in his creation.. man is created , the wise will seek there creator the source of life. in the quest for truth. Please re consider you words, man has been going with out the True G-D YHWH this whole time since the fall of Adam in the garden ,Methuselah the longest living man , and Noah and Our Father. Life with out death is the reality for those who live upright and seek the light. Shalom
lionsofisrael 1 year ago
@lionsofisrael You are crazy in the head. I am informned..how exactly are we going to have a rational conversation? I'm sorry that your will is frail and you need imaginary crutches in the form of manmade concepts of god. Life without death is the reality for humans who embrace technology that's around the corner, no delusions required!
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
@MindfulFuture It is sad that some children do not recognize their FATHER The Almighty One who must have always existed in order for there to be life etc.
I hope for you that you will see the creation and the blessings are all a pointing us to the Great One YAH. HIS Prophets teach us in Psalms 14 "A fool Says in his heart there is no G-D."
lionsofisrael 1 year ago
@lionsofisrael yes, a very convenient point the men who wrot the book inserted to keep your eyes closed "don't listen to the non-believer/he will try to trick you blah blah blah'. I hope that you will see reality ye troll of your own design.
MindfulFuture 1 year ago
@lionsofisrael
Um. What?
jmario232 1 year ago
Regardless of the possibility of life after death that does not mean that I oppose immortality. I am enjoying the current life I have and I never want part with it. I also cannot stand the pain of seeing people I know suffer and I cannot stand grievances of others who are depressed from losing a loved one. I would really enjoy having all suffering in the world be brought to an end.
jmario232 1 year ago
religious nutcases need to stay out of the science room. If you look on other videos related to this subject, you will find many of them.
curingaging00 1 year ago
don't get me wrong, some religious people are pretty cool and open minded, its just the selected few that are causing problems and rubbing their BS at everyone!
curingaging00 1 year ago
the goverment should fund this guy instead of spending money on rediculous programs and backpocketting the money for themselves.
bily481 1 year ago
look it's santa!!! he made himself biologically young again!
STAprincess28 1 year ago
@STAprincess28 look his beard if his way off saying I can look old but live forever :OP lol hes funny but a legend
3tangle3 1 year ago
I would live 2500 years MAX.
BoneThugsandAKon 1 year ago
also, ponder this, if the entire population of earth was made to be young indefinitely right now; it would be a complete hault in our evolutionary process. i don't think we are at a point in our human evolvement where we should just stop, we have billions more years to evolve into something even greater, humans from a billion years from now (saying we make it that far) will look back at humans today like we look back at our primitive ancestors. we've got a long road ahead as a species
indosaur 1 year ago
Furthermore, technological and biomedical advancement are the only logical evolutionary outcome for intelligent beings, congratulations on knowing next to nothing about evolution you idiot. Once a sapient species becomes intelligent enough it would be extremely counter-productive for them to just let "nature take its course" and evolve them over billions of years, especially when they're capable of doing it much faster their own way.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
how does slowing the pace of aging evolve the human genome to get to a point where we are any more advanced intellectually? it doesn't. aging isn't cancer, either, don't make that comparison. you are the one desperately trying to convince yourself through "ridiculous reasons" that aging is a bad thing. its part of living, its motivation to live now, get used to it. we're all gonna die one day, this is only slowing the inevitable. what good is living 4000 years anyways?
indosaur 1 year ago
Aging IS a bad thing, it's the root of all disease, the main reason disease is so prevalent today is because as one gets older their bodies become more susceptible to serious damage from outside factors because it's less efficient at repairing itself. I reiterate, you are making up reasons as to why it's actually a good thing because you are still of the mind that it's inevitable and thus have to rationalize it so you can sleep at night. Death does not give life meaning, LIFE gives life meaning.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
Secondly, you're committing the logical fallacy that we'd remain in our current biological state through all those years, when prevailing science doesn't find that to be plausible. At some point in those 1000 years we'll have found a way to rid ourselves of our dependence on this lone biological substrate we call our bodies, which will be accomplished through nanotechnology and mind uploading. All SENS will do is ensure we see that day.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
right, ive watched 'quest for immortality' as well, good job stealing that line. but again, actually convince me of why it would be better to make it to a point where the construct of my mind would be in existence forever? and yes, death is inevitable, silly. :p
indosaur 1 year ago
what happens when there is noone left to upkeep the technology that contains the construct of your mind? that would be in the same exact sense of the word; death.
indosaur 1 year ago
One last thing, fuck your deathist shitheel movie "The Fountain". That's exactly the sort of media representation we need less of, rationalizing why death is actually a good thing. I can say with the utmost confidence that it is not even close to a good thing.
You need to go watch "To Age or Not To Age".
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh
sucks to be you, because you like everyone before and after you will someday die...you can bet your life on it.
if i were you, i'd start spending less time on petty pipe dreams of immortality and more on learning to accept simple parts of reality (you know, like how things that begin end)
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 Yes well you're not me so you and your deathist values can go fuck yourselves. If I were YOU I'd stop putting up with this awful fact and start working towards doing something about it because there's absolutely no reason that any logical human being who values knowledge, relationships and emotions should have to put up with this terrible imposition. If we look at all the times in history people like you have said "so and so will never happen", they've always been proven wrong.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh
ok, first off, deathist?
second, why are you so certain that death is some "terrible imposition" or an "awful fact"?
it seems you are pretending to have knowledge that nobody can truly claim to know. If you have any factual knowledge of creation, the universe, the workings and realities of the other dimensions, the human mind (like how we store knowledge as memory), the origin of life, etc...then please write a long book or two.
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 Yes, "deathist", it's not a made up term and you'd do well to look up what deathism means. It's basically a blanket term for cynics like you who dismiss a cure for aging as pie-in-the-sky nonsense, much like people in the 1800s would've said about "horseless vehicles" and aviation. You just show that you have a poor understanding of the progress we've made in regenerative medicine. We know exactly what causes aging, we're devising ways to prevent it.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 I agree with you. But note: we're not trying to prevent aging, we're lettting it happen up to a non-pathological point and then repairing it. Engineering approach remember! :)
josht246 1 year ago
@josht246
thats all well and good, however this talk of immortality is what bothers me. old age may be delayed, but it will set in eventually. and more importantly, old age doesn't kill everyone: car accidents, plane crashes, poison foods, war, falling down the steps etc etc etc. so, i just want people to understand death is inevitable, so we should learn to accept it. fear...or hope. thats the choice as i see it :P
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 You're not even paying attention to what he's talking about. Old age will NEVER "set in eventually" if he is successful. He defines aging as accumulation of damage, and this procedure seeks to do AWAY with that damage, thus our lives will continue on indefinitely, and in a youthful state no less. We will never experience the frailty and decrepitude inherent to old age.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@PsychoJosh
oh i am paying attention. i have read some of his stuff, as well as watched some documentary on the man.
look, what your saying...you won't listen to me. or anyone else. i don't want to seem condescending, but this is the only thought i see fit to relay:
"Much fear I sense in you."
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 And with the Star Wars quote I come to the realization that I must be talking to a fucking child. Thanks for giving me a reason not to talk to you anymore.
PsychoJosh 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101
Your a child. You used a quote from Star Wars? Anyway. He is making incredible progress in his reasearch. Did you not even read the reply to my previous comment. It will be cured in mice in this decade. What do you think will happen in the next decade. Thanks to what this brilliant man is doing I will live for billions of years. I have no fears. You have fears of being proven wrong.
jmario232 1 year ago
@jmario232
Yoda...therefore i am a child...brilliant!
I have fears of being proven wrong? thats speaks greatly of your foolishness.
I am arguing that death is inevitable. You disagree. I am already right, it is YOU who have something to prove. Your whole statement is wrong. The whole of the history of creation (billions of years) has stated that all things must come to an end. I have nothing to prove, it is you who do. btw, billions of years would drive the human mind mad.
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101
Your the fool, you are wrong, and you are mere child. Stay out of the science room and play with your action figures kid.
jmario232 1 year ago
@jmario232
ad hominem much?
oh and "and you are mere child"
is completely incorrect grammar.
but...what do i know, i'm just a child right? strange, i'm 21, i thought that made me an adult...but then again, you're so smart you know how to become immortal, so i suppose i should listen to you.
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101
21 eh? Then your a manchild lol.
jmario232 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 billions of years wouldnt drive the human mind mad. if the entire population were to become 'mad' then there'd be no concept of mad anymore so thus your cynical argument fails if you were the only immortal person in a world of normal people then you would go mad i agree. living is inherently good and therefore living indefinately is also good. dont refer to 'history of creation' because there is no creation this world happened by accident.
maxgunn555 1 year ago
@maxgunn555
you obviously have a poor concept of time.
and...this world happened by accident?
...living is inherently good?
please don't talk too me. i can't say it any simpler than that.
nobody this side of the grave will live forever. in 50 years, i may still be alive. if you wackjobs are as well (and perfectly youthful of course), then please, talk to me then. so you can tell me how wrong i was proven. if not, shut up.
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 yes it happened by accident it wasn't created. yes living is inherently good because you take pleasure in living as perfectly as perfectly as you possibly can. apparently this generation will see immortality a possibility. anyway its the sign of an ignorant person if they would choose to live less a shorter amount of time than is possible.
maxgunn555 1 year ago
@maxgunn555
LOL
as i said, when immortality is a "possibility" then you can talk. untill then, all you got is one dude swearing it "will be" in a decade or two...so untill then, shut up. you have everything left to prove.
oh, and i laugh at people like you who think you're intelligent enough to make factual claims about the creation (oh i'm sorry i mean accident) of the UNIVERSE.
Tartersauce101 1 year ago
@Tartersauce101 if science tries to defeat the ageing process inevitably they will. we've put men on the moon, internet e.t.c. anything is possible given time. and we're hearing that it may be possible for those who are less than 50 years old now so be gratefull. choosing to live less than the maximum time available is virtual suicide. so keep on arguing that suicide is a good thing you ignorant shit.
maxgunn555 1 year ago