Dawkins and Chomsky - MICE MICE MICE MICE

[BlazedBastar666]

Not what I was looking for, but I lol'd all the way through, you have cute mice! They should hang out with my mousey bro, Timothy Leary Jr.

[kekman000]

this looks like my girlfriend

[kekman000]

I THINK THAT THIS VIDIO SHOULD BE DELETE

[fridgelawless]

Should we be more sympathetic to this guy?

He has a misleading title for his video. he is obviously desperate for people to listen to his rubbish music.

He almost certainly paid for this "feature video". thats desperate. pretending to name your mice dawkins and chomsky. thats desperate.

83 dislikes and freinds and family and you with a total of 18 accounts. I say take the hint and remove or retitle the video.

[pocketfox17]

I feel really really bad that your video has so many dislikes. Obviously people got pissed off cause they were looking for Dawkins and/or Chomsky. But your mice are absolutely adorable and those are fantastic names! :)

[Verseaurainbows]

I love you because you have mice called Chomsky and Dawkins and they made a film of them. I have 3 mice (female) called Ian, Ian and Ken. Your title isn't misleading. I came to it whilst researching a project for college, and wasn't put out by it at all. It brought a welcome smile to my face.

[clerkhog]

why so many dislike, its not as if they lost anything by watching it

[film4thefuture]

Chomsky good, Dawkins bad.

[sgpquek]

@film4thefuture liberation theology good, liberation dickology bad.

[drruggeri]

Great names for mice.

[battybungbong]

LOL add me to the people who thought they were going to see Dawkins and Chomsky having some sort of dicussion about mice! lol!

[AlwaysReason]

I think the two rats are called Dawkins and Chomsky - pretty hillarious

[46scribe]

What has this video got to do with the title? Nothing that is why I have flag it.

[gaussian]

They're pretty original names for mice. Excellent.

[vrejulfermecat]

Mice are super fun animals!

Cool video.

[Diosibundo]

@vrejulfermecat

And they taste great with a nice Bordeaux!

[drekas2005]

The more I listen to Dawkins the less

convincing he sounds. I thought he and Hitchens had something to say but as I

listen closely I'm greatly disappointed at the simplistic argument they both make. I'm glad I'm on neither side and still a reasonable skeptic.

[Diosibundo]

@drekas2005

What exactly don't you find convincing about him? Dawkins, I mean... On Hitchens I agree with you, but Dawkins?

I find his arguments "simplistic" because the tpic itself is pretty simple, a relatively bright seventh grader can figure it out.

(actually, I WAS making those same arguments when I was in the 7th grade! lol)

[drekas2005]

@Diosibundo I made those arguments when

I had to do the Old Testament in the 3rd grade. I was baptized Orthodox Christian.

The perspective these Oxford scholars have

I had back then. Today over 40 years later I have realized that it's not the description or the format in which these books were written, but the underlying moral message they convey. Don't label me fundamental I just like to look at things from the middle line.

[Diosibundo]

drekas2005

Aren't those two different questions? One is the moral message (which could come from any cultural heritage, religious or not)...

A completely separate question is "Are the claims of divinity true"?

I grew up in a non religious household, so these argument often puzzle me.

[drekas2005]

@Diosibundo Yeah sure...Whatever you say.

I'm not sure I feel like running around in a circle trying to catch my tail. Have fun.

[Diosibundo]

No wonder you find Dawkins confusing

[drekas2005]

@Diosibundo Au contraire, I find him obtuse,

humorless ,insensitive and very repetitive.

With a personality like that , I'm perplexed as to why he acts so arrogant. Go figure.

[Diosibundo]

Wow.

Not overly bright are you?

[drekas2005]

@Diosibundo Brighter than you old boy and I don't have to play your infantile head games to prove it either. I'm afraid there's no one who can pass a ring through my nose and pull me or put both my feet in the same shoe, even if he did come from Oxford.

[HenryNavarre]

@drekas2005

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this.

I find it quite easy to separate claims of divinity and one's moral track. Morality's existence is not dependent on religion. So, if Morality can exist outside the sphere of irrational thought, why not let it?

There's a wonderful subset of atheism called "humanism" which I find quite endearing and is somewhat related to this.

[cacagrandeputo]

It's nice you named your mice that way. You must me good looking... But stop deceiving people with misleading titles!

[marsCubed]

@cacagrandeputo how is it misleading?

It is their names.

If you type in Noam Chomsky or Richard Dawkins as search criteria, then you will have been more specific.

or are we not permitted to use the name of famous people for pets?

It is nominism, a form of authoritarian control in which names give their owners status over those who cannot use such a title.

no wonder the mice have moved to the left and are trying to overthrow such illegitimate ownership and private titles in the only way they can.

[ChadSmith1452]

Join me in flagging this video.

Dishonest titles are not to be tolerated.

[takheads]

you are kinda dissing chomsky by insinuating that dawkins is in his league!

[ABagOfFritos]

Dawkins > Chomsky

[joshhough00]

Chomsky>Dawkins

[Diosibundo]

@joshhough00

Ha ha. I think even Dawkins would agree to that one!

[MrSalamander7]

I love Dawkins, but no. Just plain no.

[scarletletterman84]

while dawkins is undeniably a very intelligent man, Im inclined to agree with you. I wish I knew more people irl who read chomsky! Have u read John Pilger?? do so.

[tokotokotoko3]

Haha, expected something vastly different. Enjoyed the contrast very mucht though.

And who is to say who is the real Chomsky? :)

[PopeTrav]

I love that music can make even the dullest of dull watchable...except this :)

[jsm666]

Dawkins is one of the greatest men alive. Chomsky is sick, bitter and twisted.

[psykotrol]

What makes you say that? Because he criticizes American foreign and domestic policies? Because truth is just so absolutely painful for you?

Chomsky never insults people when he debates them, hes an encyclopedia of knowledge, and he defends freedom wherever it is, even if that freedom is the freedom of people he disagrees with. The same cannot be said for most conservatives and liberals, and indeed almost everybody in the world. The man is a walking, living prophet of libertarian ideals.

[Zurein]

Love how you named the mice after two of the greatest men alive ^^

[ndasilenced]

proof of how one can only be half right.

[jspre1]

misleading search results (chomsky / dawkins)O_O

[kekman000]

sorry jspre - i'll change the tags

thanks for watching though ;)