Added: 5 years ago
From: clintsbaker
Views: 364,852
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9,695)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • High school biology teaches that photosynthesis metabolises all available carbon dioxide into new life on earth. The fossil fuels formed as 85% of life on earth died with the dinosaurs. Burning their fuels, get the life back-but be prepared by a natural ice ages which will happen

  • @JonThm High school taught me not to listen to denier charlatans like you, lol

  • Green plants metabolise all the extra carbon dioxide. So there is more life on earth, but no more carbon dioxide in the air due to man

  • @JonThm no sources, just your ridiculous opinion. 

    The good news is science is true whether or not you believe in it!

  • Comment removed

  • Extract available carbon dioxide stimulates photosynthesis

  • even Leo has been sucked into this BS. I wonder if he wears birkenstocks?

  • The effects of nuclear tests are still with us today.

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..

    (Please read before the denier with all the sock accounts censors it)..

    .

    The record-breaking 14 billion-dollar weather disasters of 2011

    .

    For years, scientists have predicted that climate change, fueled by heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions, would lead to more extreme weather. More floods in our amber waves of grain, more wildfires in the shadow of our purple mountains. Stronger storms from sea to shining sea.

    .

    Daily Green

    22 Jan 2012

  • @Nightversionn Sound the panic alarms, storms, floods, blizzards, hurricanes, damn is this the Old Testament, thanks for the warning! Unfortunately for alarmist clowns, this is normal weather events that prove nothing, only proving what a gullible fool u r!

  • @harp1925 Tell Exxon it's already happening.  And everyone knows it.

  • GW was Allies on behalf of nuclear power

  • Carbon dioxide supports life on earth

  • The effects on nuclear testing will last for 2000 year. Molecular nuclear fusion is safe, clean and free

  • nuke testing started in 1945 to 1998 when "the UN" ban began.......

  • radiation is the reason wake up!!

  • Comment removed

  • In 2001 as doing a Ph.D. into global warming: which got stopped when I said global warming was PR fiction from nuclear power. The world started cooling 1998-for teen years ago!

  • @JonThm hmmm nuke testing stopped at that time ...

  • Carbon dioxide is the gas of life

  • @MyJonJonify No it isn't, co2 is heating up the planet and millions are being affected already. Please tell your Exxon masters about it?

  • @Nightversionn There is no single piece of real evidence that points to CO2 affecting one life let alone millions unless of course you can provide some evidence,which you can't.

    The bottom line of this is that global warming ended in 1998.

  • Scientists say cut soot, methane to curb warming

    AP-An international team of scientists says it has figured out how to slow global warming: Stop focusing so much on carbon dioxide. They say the key is to reduce emissions of two powerful and fast-acting causes of global warming — methane and soot.

    Two dozen scientists from around the world ran computer models of 400 different existing pollution control measures and came up with 14 methods that attack methane and soot.

  • @RandomVersion Methane is only 1.7 ppm compared to GHGs H2O 25,000ppm, and CO2 390ppm and here is the kicker, for the past 25 years, CH4 levels have been DROPPING!!!! Get a life you CAGW bed wetter. CAGW is a dead theory. Stop just making stuff up and trying to pass it off as science. You CAGW bed wetters have actually destroyed legitimate environmentalism with your lies and now true environmentalism has lost ALL credibility. Nice going you bed wetters.

  • @ShockofClara why did they spam you on this goggle2k was a fool of the highest order....I give this comment a thumbs up

  • Photosynthesis metabolises all the available carbon dioxide stupid!

  • @JonThm All due respect, cough, you can't even spell and write properly. Who's more credible, a denier troll sock puppet account, or scientists.

    Duh????

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..Nature Journal edition:

    (Please read article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts is allowed to censor it)..

    .

    Thawing permafrost reduces river runoff

    .

    Chinese researchers have revealed that the amount of water entering the Yangtze River near its source on the Tibetan plateau has fallen by 15% over the past four decades, despite a 15% increase in glacial melt and increased rainfall over the same period.

    .

    Nature

    7 January 2012

  • Thumbs up if you noticed that the title was spelt "Global Warning"!

  • @NBTVonline I gave you a thumbs up because I did notice. I think it may be intentional, however

  • The world has been cooling naturally for for teen years. How old is this media?

  • The natural climate started cooling in 1998. I strongly advise the precepts of this region to go@Sunday

  • China airlines refuse to pay EU carbon charge

    Chinese airlines will not pay a charge on carbon emissions imposed by the European Union from January 1

    "China, of course, will not cooperate with the European Union on the ETS (emissions trading scheme)," said Chai Haibo, deputy secretary-general of the China Air Transport Association, which represents the country's airlines.

    He said the Chinese government was considering "counter-measures" against the European Union

  • Who cares, it's gonna be canceled out my nuclear winter anyways... (troll)

  • @Nightversionn All your dumb comments are spammed, get the hint! You, ferret, and sndtonone, need to get a clue and admit u r wrong on globull warming, LOL!

  • The sun still produces most of our energy, making plants grow and supporting life etc. We just need to harvest some of this energy to run our gadgets. In the fullness of time a millenium is a very short period so the sky may not be falling. Clean energy at low cost is a good reason to develop solar and wind power.

  • Plant growth converts carbon dioxide into life on earth

  • Actually Why Does we Have to live?

  • This is nothing but misinfo

    Plenty things could happen

    I could win the lotto, i never do

    Thinking i could win the lotto should i spend the money now?

    Well i could win the lotto so shouldn't i count on it happening? Of course not!!!

    None of this is based on proven science.

    It is all hypothetical.

    Since when do we make disicions based on hypothetical scenarios.

    We are better and smarter than this!

    We need to look at the people who claim these things, and why they are claiming them.

  • @tiffcomp Great comment, summed up perfectly.

  • The world has been cooling naturally for 14 years

  • Dr Richard Lindzen:

    "For small changes in climate associated with tenths of a degree, there is no need for any external cause. The earth is never exactly in equilibrium. The motions of the massive oceans where heat is moved between deep layers and the surface provides variability on time scales from years to centuries. Recent work (Tsonis et al, 2007), suggests that this variability is enough to account for all climate change since the 19th Century."

  • @RandomVersion Excellent information, minor fluctuations in temps is normal, excessive hype is not. Stop the global warming lie, the climate is normal!

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series

    (please read article before this denier oil TROLL with all the sock puppet accounts censors it).

    .

    A warmer and wetter new 'normal' for Alaska weather. Think Alaska has been warmer than normal?

    .

    You just might be right. But whether that wee simmer offers regional evidence for global warming is a complicated issue, hinging on semantics, starting dates and one somewhat inconvenient question: Warmer than what?

    .

    Anchorage Alaska Dispatch

    2 Jan 2012

  • The world started cooling naturally for 13 years ago: how you are old is this idea?

  • We may suffocate before we fry.

    You know NOTHING.

    Just deal and dry your eyes.

  • Carbon fuels formed from the carbohydrates of life which died with the dinosaurs. In the Jurassic there were natural ice ages-as if all the fossil fuels had been downed in one night

  • i don't care who the narrator is. Global warming is not real

  • In the Jurassic the fossil fuels hadn't formed. 65% more life than today. Sea levels 60 metres lower

  • @JonThm uh huh, so why don't you and your Exxon buddies go back and live in the time of dinosaurs, idiot

  • this seems to be confusing people so i'll spell it out.

    The TOTAL amount of Carbon on earth is CONSTANT.

    MORE of it was in the ground before the industrial revolution, now there is LESS in the ground and MORE in the air.

    the more carbon in the air there is, the less heat can radiate back into space.

  • @whiteshark1212 Nicely put, I hadn't looked at it that way. Indeed, we've put billions of tons of co2 into the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution.

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series (please read article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it):

    .

    As climate change worsens, scientists feel increasing pressure to speak out

    .

    Factors contributing to climate change are moving faster than predicted and pushing us toward planetary conditions unlike any humans have ever known—this was one of the salient themes to emerge from this month's meeting of the American Geophysical Union.

    .

    Inside Climate News

    12/30/11

  • @Nightversionn More/Lies to get hands on fund money faster! Of course scientists want more done earlier, it allows them to push for grants earlier, truth hurts eh!

  • Photosynthesis eight global warming

  • Global warming was a lie from nuclear power after Chernobyl

  • Comment removed

  • stop cheap flights stop woman drivers stop it stop it stop it god damn it

  • Evidence/impacts of climate change series...(read it before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Insurance regulators accelerate climate action to keep feds at bay

    .

    State insurance regulators are feeling pressure to address climate change before a federal counterpart established last year moves in on their territory.

    .

    ClimateWire

    22 Dec 2011

  • @Nightversionn Please, your posts are moronic lies, what is your I.Q. 50? LOL, bahahahahahahahahahahah!

  • The carbon fuels were life on earth in the Jurassic

  • Plants take in carbon dioxide to do photosynthesis. Mankind has increased life on earth. But not increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air

  • Green plants metabolise all the carbon dioxide from the air. To form new life on earth. GW is nuclear fiction

  • GW is fiction from nuclear fission

  • He's nuclear fiction

  • Biology metabolises carbon dioxide. It is the limit to life on earth. Is level in the air has been static for 200 years

  • @david222444 troll, too much co2 is already causing problems in terms of extreme weather events (heard about the Philippines as of late ?)

    duh???

  • Atmospheric Co2 enrichment benefits all life on the Planet.

  • Biology converts all free carbon dioxide into life on earth

  • The limit to life on earth is free carbon dioxide in the air

  • @Dingbat1 Once again, I'm still waiting for the title of the non-existent peer-reviewed paper stating the yearly average of 2010/11 delta C12/13 is -8.45 permil.... Just one you jerk... Just one. Since such a paper doesn't exist because you are wrong, just STFU, apologize for lying, and move on, you wanker.

  • The natural climate started cooling 1998-according to 100 leading American scientists

  • We have pumped billions of tons of co2 into the air since the Industrial Revolution

    Duh?

  • 700 billion tons of Co2... there is barely even 700 billion tons of air...

  • fuk lucky 11 left on

  • Basic biology: plants metabolise all available carbon dioxide into new life on earth

  • Green plants metabolise all carbon dioxide

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series...

    .

    Warming will transform natural world

    .

    Global warming could bring a major transformation for Earth's plants and animals over the next century, a NASA study says, driving nearly half the planet's forests, grasslands and other vegetation toward conversion into radically different types of ecosystems.

    .

    Orange County Register, California

    16 December 2011

  • O level biology teaches that the limit to life on earth is available carbon dioxide for plants to metabolise in photosynthesis. Oxygen is the greatest pollutant in earth history. Nuclear power is the most toxic invention man has ever made. Burning fossil fuels increases life on earth.

  • @dingbat1-- Your insipid and stupid argument that H20's GHG effect is "rained out" is as hilarious as it is vacuous. Water evaporation/precipitation is 24/7/365 process between the hydrosphere/atmosphere/biosphe­re/lithosphere. This in no way mitigates the fact that H2O's GHG is massively larger than CO2's paltry 390ppm. The AVERAGE (you really have a problem averages, don't you) H2O atmospheric level is 25,000 ppm vs. man-mad atmospheric CO2 at around 22ppm. What a joke.

  • @dingbat1-- Your insipid and stupid argument that H20's GHG effect is "rained out" is as hilarious as it is vacuous. Water evaporation/precipitation is 24/7/365 process between the hydrosphere/atmosphere/biosphe­re/lithosphere. This in no way mitigates the fact that H2O's GHG is massively larger than CO2's paltry 390ppm. The AVERAGE (you really have a problem averages, don't you) H2O atmospheric level is 25,000 ppm vs. man-mad atmospheric CO2 at around 22ppm. What a joke.

  • @dingbat1-- Your insipid and stupid argument that H20's GHG effect is "rained out" is as hilarious as it is vacuous. Water evaporation/precipitation is 24/7/365 process between the hydrosphere/atmosphere/biosphe­re/lithosphere. This in no way mitigates the fact that H2O's GHG is massively larger than CO2's paltry 390ppm. The AVERAGE (you really have a problem averages, don't you) H2O atmospheric level is 25,000 ppm vs. man-mad atmospheric CO2 at around 22ppm. What a joke.

  • @dingbat1 You lying piece of dog excrement. The delta C13 permil value IS -8.2 at Mauna Loa as I stated. Given the seasonal harmonics of the delta C13 permil value (-8.1 to -8.45), you simply used the lowest value of 2010 instead of using the spline function to get a value for the year. You're the worst type of scumbag there is. You're a liar and anything you say cannot be trusted. Jerk.

  • @samuraiconservative

    I see you feel the need to present me as a liar given the poor relationship with reality I've revealed in your comments.

    I looked at the graph and guestimated values. More accurately Mauna Loa surface (Flask Samples) using the spline as you prefer: -7.9 in 1996, -8.35 in 2011, change - a drop of 0.45 in the last 15 years. I previously implied a 0.5 drop.

    I don't lie. Bottom line - the C12/C13 ratio keeps falling.

  • @Dosbat1 LOL! Rather than apologize for lying, you lie about your lying. You knew what you did was dishonest. You know that averages or means are used in science for values with large annual harmonics but you just lied like all CAGW hoaxers do for "The Cause". You have ZERO credibility and yes, you are a liar. You're pathetic.

  • @samuraiconservative

    My guesstimate was 0.5, using the splines (as you prefer) it was 0.45.

    I have nothing to apologise for. I did not lie.

    Your aggression and foul language speaks volumes for your cause. So I won't demand an apology. Keep up the good work.

    Fact - water vapour precipitates out, so it cannot sustain a warming trend. CO2 doesn't so, amplified by water vapour, it can sustain a trend. I know you have problems with reality but that is a basic physical fact.

  • @Dosbat1 You lying scumbag. You took the lowest permil value of the year and called that the average, you twit. The C12/13 permil value is -8.1 and all your inane excuses of eyeballing graphs and coming up with some made up permil value is BS. Science has strict protocols of determining ONE yearly value for widely fluctuating data points. If you can show me ONE peer-reviewed paper that states the 2011 permil value is 8.45, I'll shut up, but since that's impossible, shut your lying pie hole.

  • @samuraiconservative

    Once again - My guesstimate was 0.5, using the splines (as you prefer) the figure was 0.45. That's a 0.05 diference. So I have nothing to apologise for and I did not lie.

    I don't believe you're really angry about this. You're just trying to deflect attention from are all the times I've shown you wrong. Were I still a Conservative and a sceptic I'd find you embarrassing.

  • @Dosbat1 Once again, science is about facts, not about some made up "guesstimate" you came up with eyeballing some damn chart and taking the LOWEST value in order to distort the facts. I'm still waiting for the nonexistent peer-reviewed paper stating the delta C12/13 permil 2010/11 YEARLY average value is -8.45 or -8.5. You were wrong, I was correct and you won't admit it because you're an arrogant lib prick that has absolutely no idea of the science he's cutting and pasting or contriving.

  • @samuraiconservative

    "Once again, science is about facts, not about some made up "guesstimate"..."

    Google Scholar - search term "estimate": 4.59 million returns.

    Once again? Surely you mean "Yet again."

    Boring.

  • @Dingbat1 You're easily fooled aren't you. RT is a bunch of crap. If CO2 is in the Aquaspphere or lithosphere, it's not in the atmosphere now is it. If its not in the atmosphere, then its's not acting as a GHG buffer is it. Regarding the "acidifification" (LOL) of the oceans, the oceans' pH is still around 8.0 which is alkaline, fool.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Great news, 2ndtonone has not been heard from, he is confused by the new u tube set up, showing off that 50 IQ! Also, ferret has disappeared, both are tired of getting whipped behind the barn. Anyways, good riddance losers, g.w. is a fraud and has been exposed.

  • @dingbat1 I'm glad you brought up C12/13 isotopes. The atmospheric C12/13 permil value is -8.2 proving the total amount of man made CO2 is only about 5.7% or only about 22ppm out of 390ppm. Moreover, you must this paltry 22ppm vs. the overwhelmingly dominant GHG H2O, which is 25,000 ppm. How can an intelligent person possibly believe in CAGW.. Answer: you can't. Climate is primarily determined by the sun, you dolt. Don't even mention CO2 positive feedbacks as they're insignificant.

  • @samuraiconservative

    How many times must you be shown to be wrong before you spot the pattern?

    ESRL Global Monitoring Division: Mauna Loa, CO2[C12/C13] has dropped from -8.0 to -8.5 per mil in the last 15 years.

    Water vapour condenses out of the atmosphere, so it cannot sustain increases in temperature. CO2 does not condense out of the atmosphere with cooling. Remove the CO2 and the planet cools to a 'snowball earth' Lacis et al 2010.

  • @dingbat1 you are so lame. It's the idiot CAGW HOAXERS that are guilty of incoherent logic: if it rains- AGW, if there's drought-AGW, if there is record snow-AGW, no snow AGW, warmer seas- AGW, if it's cold-AGW. What kind of moron would even consider such BS. The fact is Nobody with a bit of common sense believes in CAGW anymore. Just wait until temps get colder and colder as the years pass. Just throw in the towel your cagw cult is finished.

  • @NightVersionn You silly liitle twit. The 2011 Mississippi floods were caused by record snowmelt from a record cold winter. Tell me, how does record cold temps and record snowfall help your gloooobal waaaaarming BS? Oh, that's right warming causes frigid winters... How can you still believe in such garbage?

  • A recent peer reviewed paper by Prof. Solheim of Oslo U. predicts average yrly temps will drop 3.5 C, and winter temps will drop 6 C in Northern Norway over the next 10 yrs due to a shift in the solar cycle. If Solheim's research is true, CAGW wil FINALLY be conclusively proven to be the fraud it is within just a few years. Hopefully the 200 scoundrels that destroyed and manipulated data to perpetuate the CAGW hoax will be exiled to northern Norway to atone for their crimes against humanity.

  • @samuraiconservative

    "A recent peer reviewed paper..."

    We're back to the balloons and static electricity. Arguments often get circular when dealing with stupids.

    You can stick a balloon to the wall by rubbing it on your jumper, this doesn't mean gravity has stopped working. Static electricity overcomes gravity.

    Likewise solar changes might overcome GW. But given that the warming in the Arctic is accelerating during a record low solar minima a cooling is unlikely.

  • the simple logic of global warming

    temperatures will NOT get hotter, but more extreme

    the ozone is used to insulate the earths heat so it's less hot during the day/summer and less cold during the night/winter.

    W/O ozone, it will get more hot during summer months and more cold during winter months

  • This is high school biology: plants convert all the extra carbon dioxide into new life on earth, excrete ink the surplus oxygen. So we get new plants and animals. Only see more carbon dioxide is a blessing humanity has ever done for life on earth. No climate affect possible: that was Allies from nuclear power and the mentally retorted or paid

  • I preached plant2 18 months ago: plants metabolise all the available carbon dioxide from the air.

  • I had an IQ of 149 to 18. I did a master's degree in engineering. Even I know that plants metabolise carbon dioxide. So photosynthesis controls the level of carbon dioxide in the air, not manned. He can do is increase life on earth. Harvard University has confirmed this is true and. And yes I do talk to Harvard

  • @JonThm

    Now you really are lying.

    I work in engineering and from your comments here I'd be surprised if you have even one 'O-level', you certainly haven't got a masters in Engineering.

    You're also lying about Harvard and CO2, they've shown nothing of the sort. The CO2 increase is due to humans; land CO2 uptake is increasing, the oceans are acidifying due to CO2 uptake - so the increase in CO2 can't be coming from natural sources, then there's the decrease in C12/C13 ratio and O2.

  • @dingbat1 LOL! ARGO, AMO, PDO, ENSO, ocean levels are all falling you clueless twit and yes, CO2 levels are still rising, which means to anyone with an IQ above 80 that CO2 is an inconsequential factor in natural global warming. Man-made CO2 only accounts for a paltry 20ppm of the minuscule 390ppm of atmospheric CO2. It's the sun cycles, stupid, which is the main driving force behind climate change and it's been changing for the past 4.5 billion years, you dope.

  • @samuraiconservative

    You not only fail, but you fail on every point.

    Humans are responsible for all of the CO2 increase.

    Solar activity has been level between 1975 and 2007 yet temperatures have gone up. As Martin Wild shows solar radiation at ground level has fallen (due to pollution) while temperatures have gone up!

    Solar activity and global temperature correlates well - until 1975 when the correlation falls as CO2 takes over.

  • Free carbon dioxide has been static for two centuries

  • @JonThm

    Obviously you're too witless to use Google, that makes you double figure IQ range. If you could search google using 'CO2 increase' you'd find ample evidence that shows your wrong.

    CO2 is increasing, the annual increase is 2ppm, this is due to human activity (mainly the burning of fossil fuels).

  • @dingbat1 You clueless wonder... Nightvisionn lied saying Toronto is now 14 degrees when in fact it's -4. I was just exposing one of his many lies.

  • @samuraiconservative

    Clueless - no. I just don't follow your banal discussions in detail.

    Clueless is thinking that because the ENSO and solar activity have caused a pause in the warming in recent years this means AGW has stopped. Just as clueless as thinking static electricity making a balloon stick to a wall means gravity isn't working.

    Clueless is having to parrot the baseless assertion that AGW is a dead theory because you're bereft of evidence.

  • @Nightversionn Toronto is -4 C right now. You are such a pathetic liar. Your precioussss CAGW is so busted, you have to even lie about city temps. Get a life.

  • @samuraiconservative

    Toronto is -4degC - WOW this could only mean it's winter!

    It gets cold in winter bonehead.

  • @Nightversionn It's obvious you're a wreck... CAGW IS DEAD get used to it. You're about the only person left posting their delusions on this vid. CAGW is finished.

  • @ttttrat it's obvious we are wrecking the planet