Added: 2 years ago
From: Olmec98
Views: 17,970
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All Indians are descendants of dravidians. The foreigners try to make us feel ashamed of our dravidian heritage by saying that dravidians came from Africans because dravidians are black. THE TRUTH IS: Dravidians are not black, their skin is dark...but they have completely different origin than the Africans and even if Dravidians were black, it doesn't matter, black people are awesome :)

  • @TheDragon967 DRAVIDIANS ARE BLACK PEOPLE

  • @thevillain091 Well even if dravidians are black people, who cares, I like black people. I don't mind being called black, its just that dravidians don't look black. Its like saying the Japanese are Austrian aborigines, which is not true.

  • @downbrownintown

    will u please send me too

  • the people of harrapa were experts in town planning

  • Comment removed

  • Try reading books by Cheik Anta Diop, Ivan Van Sertima to find out the truth that was never reveal in history books. Finally the truth is coming out Slowly but surely.

  • The history of mankind is much much older than we humans want to believe. Digging through any continent will show you that everyone ones had a great civilization. The black skinned person seem to have the oldest known civilization. Much of our civilization is buried deep in the earth because everything points to black being the oldest living humans. Like I said I do not believe in racism, no man is superior to the other, we are created equal whether we like it or not.

  • God the almighty created all of us the same. He did not find favors with any of us, the only people more dearer to God are the good, honest kind people of this world. Once upon a time God bestowed greatness to every nation regardless of color or geography. Mankind is the same every where you go, you have the good and bad in every culture. If one should look through the anals of history one will discover that every culture and people had their share of fame and glory.

  • Keep up the research. I am glad that the dravidian supporters of asia and african people are rediscovering their ancient links and throw all this white supremacist toxic lies that have blinded us for centuries

  • @sonofthedestroyer I am a Brahmin (not that I really consider myself one), but I recognize that the Indus Valley Civilization was definitely Dravidian. Hindu Nationalists have not cited any evidence to support their claims that IVC was Indo-Aryan. In fact, there is ample proof to support that at the time of IVC, the ancestors of Indo-Aryans were up in Southern Kazakhstan. However, I don't think the Harappans were African per say, but no one really knows. Is your name Murugan, btw?

  • @TheChuchulainn You are a racist. Except for the Tihama culture in Arabia which was founded by Nubians there was no civilization in Bahrain. Archaeologists have only found a few burials in Bahrain. No pottery, seals, cuneiform text etc. You are a liar and fool. Because of your use of profanity I will not allow you to post further on this site.

  • @Olmec98 I am so glad you posted this video. May God help you be able to post more like this in the future. There is so much lies going around the world today especially about race. No people have been subjugated and lied to about their history as the black skinned people have been. It is high time that we research our own history once again find pride and comfort in knowing that once upon a time we were and still are a great people.

  • Comment removed

  • @OneF9Day

    that is right, the dravidian language was brought to pakistan, and small part of afghanistan and iran about 1000 years ago by dravidians who came from southern part of india. So those areas were not originally dravidian, as far as i know. Correct me if i'm wrong.

  • @IranSepahbod U are right, but this is not aryan either..aryans only came into india in huge numbers much later during the islamic conquest of india and pakistan. This civilization pre-dates them.

  • Only now do I know that the Sumerians spoke a Dravidian language. There was no historical record of what language the Sumerians spoke. Thanks, you had solved this mysterious puzzle. What great civilizations the Dravidians had!

  • You are right, all the names we know now is somewhat recent, but relating them to dravidian is not right either, the names like Sind is use in the thousand of years old Arabian tale Sindbad because they called all the people of this land as sind, with that the word Punjab is given to it by the persian who rulled this region 2500 years ago

  • harrpa is in the centeral Punjab, why they build civilization there is beause it is and was a great fertile land and land of rivers, Sindhi a word used for the first time in 18th century I do not know where you are cocking your information

  • @MrCitizenaction Sindhi is not the original name for this area. It was originally called Dilmun or Tilmun.There are many place names in the area of Dravidian origin. The names these places have today, as you point out in your post are recent.

  • @Olmec98 Dilmun was a place in Arabia. I don't dispute the fact that the Harappans were Dravidian, but you need to get your facts straight. Sindh and the Indus Valley was called Meluhha by the Mesopotamians.

  • @TheChuchulainn there is no archaeological evidence of civilization in arabia during the indus valley times. meluhha was the Sumerian name for punt in East Africa.

    The first Arabian civilization was Tihama. It was founded by the C-Group of Nubia.

  • @Olmec98 The Sumerians traded for copper with people of modern day Oman. This is archaeological fact.

    Again, get your facts straight.

  • @TheChuchulainn You don't know what you're talking about. Please provide a citation supporting this allegation.

  • love the background music

    

  • Comment removed

  • Nice work,however the map of Ashoka (272 B.C.)seems out of place.I don't know but if Sesotres I conquered the ganges then that doesn't fit with Egypt reaching to it's biggest seize by Thutmoses III ( 1480-1448 B.C.) which to my knowledge is not beyond Babylon anyway.Dravidians are a lot darker brown then I'd expected.M.L.King said it was a stigma to call so many tones of skin black or something similar.We are all colourful & in different shades.I ain't white in the summer.United we stand.

  • even arab are dark.

  • dravidians are in north and south india in north they are called brahui in south called tamil our people come from a straight haired hamitic race also from elam son of shem hence the dark race the elamites

  • @rasheed1660 that is correct people must realize that there are two races of black people on this planet called earth! the Nubian(so called negroid pheno type) & the Dravidian(so called australoid pheno type)

  • the people from the IVC were from sumeria...

  • @deeppurple19 Explain

  • @Olmec98 The argument that IVC people to be from Sumeria could be true. Firstly, Sumerian, IVC and the current Dravidian civilizations are all river valley based. Then I went thro some words of the deciphered sumerian scripts. Sumerian and Dravidian languages seem to use the same root words. The most astonishing thing was, the sumerian word for 'What?' is 'a-Na'. It is the same word used in Tamil even today ( pronounced 'Enna'). There are a few linguists who are researching from that perspective

  • @rambayt Both Sumerians and Dravidians belonged to the Maa Civilization of Africa. That is why their languages share common vacabulary.

  • @Olmec98 Maa? I demand proof that this thing even existed.

  • @TheChuchulainn I demand you present evidence this civilization did not exist.

  • @Olmec98 Oh no. The burden of proof is not on me, the career archaeologist, but on you, the guy making wild claims.

  • @TheChuchulainn You live in a fantasy world. there are numerous articles on the Maa civilization. Plus you have my video on this topic. There is no such thing as proof in research, you either confirm or disconfirm a theory. Just because your Eurocentric background left you ignorant of the Maa civilization results from your lazy character when it comes to research.--this ignorance reflects your poor knowledge base

  • The history and Linguistics clearly points to an Aryan Invasion. Most likely those were the Dravidians in Indus Valley civiization. Even Ramayana talks of Venture of Rama to Lanka and the Rakshah's were black, if someone cannot use brain to figure this, then they must be blinded by their ideology. The current Hindu tradition assimilated both Aryan and Tantric tradition, but the Tantric tradition was only second best to the Aryan tradition. .

  • whereever the aryan went they destroy culture and history and own it as their own.

    they build their existence on becoming friend -> destroying the owner -> and take everything to themselves --> ---->>

  • @waffiki ALOT OF NON BLACKS DO THAT. thats the PROBLEM! and black people be too damn genuine, we need to realize that you cant treat snakes like best friends and alies, all they spew you is venome while you give them treasures. and its the same tricks nonblacks use in USA(especially northern whites and a couple southern whites but they are more and likely open racists.)

  • @thesassiest

    believe me they are so scared of us.when blacks open our eyes and open our minds, we will unite and completely change this world,

    but if we are fools, gullible and start trusting others meaning others non-blacks again, God himself will destroy us. we must love people and do not revenge and kill or hurt them but we shouldn't be hurt twice, we are made in his image,we have to be wise, we should avoid them by any means.

  • @waffiki dont you know, whites were really scared when the black panther movement came along! they didnt whatsoever like the idea of black love and empowerment! but im thinking but yet its okay that they express white power white idealism white love and what eva! i got bannas on the thought of how fucked up this world is, and people are so brainwashed! i have had people call me brainwashed, but im not the one defending rubbish and lies! as if its fact!

  • @thesassiest Blacks as in African? If in that case you are wrong. Black as in skin tone yes.

  • @JacobTheIndoAmerican There are 22,000 different types of Black Africans. Dravidians I guess would be MtDNA M. Someone in family has ancestry to Behir, India and mine is Chennai (Madas), India. I treat my African ancestry completely different from my Indian ancestry.

  • no black as in african too. there are plenty more blacks that people mislabel. are you not watchin the video?

  • @waffiki thats true, we should. but i also believe that blacks shouldnt just let nonblacks run over them neither. when they be tryna test blacks by murdering us and tryna take over our kingdoms. we she should fight to protect. that wat really important to me FIGHT to PROTECT. nothing more and nothing less.

  • You've shown a presentation of Dravidians without mention a single word on Tamils. Recent artifacts unearthed in Indus and Tamil Nadu has shown a direct link b/w Indus and Tamil Nadu. Indus was occupied by Dravidians who used Tamil-Brahmi script, which was also unearthed in Tamil Nadu.

  • See my video on decipherment of indus valley writing

  • @rambayt

    history is based on lies and all what you read in the aryan interpretation.

    might not be true , its target was to mislead, suit themselves. i think history should be rewritten, all the lies should be eliminated.

    one reason why the world is going where it is heading now.

  • @rambayt lmao Tamil-Brahmi script?! How's that shit supposed to work? Brahmi = explicitly Indic script used in Hindi,Sanskrit, etc.

    It;s a little obvious that Australoids werent the creators of the ancient world' ssuperpower.

  • Europeans are ill-hearted to accept the fact that India and Bharatvarsha is the frontrunner of all civilisation in this world. Just think of a simple fact. Why are now people seriously trying to discredit Aryans (saying them to be from outside India and barbarians), Vedas (saying them to be mere sacrificial recitals), Hinduism (by saying that it is the birthplace of caste system)??? It is simply because, Britishers stumbled upon a great civilisation bigger, nobler and cogent than all they knew.

  • @ramji23aryan

    no i think the british realised the importance of the discovery and the magnitude of the silimiarites between the two cultures. your comment reeks of hindu nationalism as are most of the comments posted by indians, in 1938 a mass of mediterraen sub-type skeletons buried in elaborate manner were discovered within the ivc.many asians are too eager to discredit an outside influence of this culture, many westerners are hateful of their own achievements and try to discredit with essay

  • @ramji23aryan

    there is a strong mediteranean influence on all the early cultures,while not completley indicating europid origin,there is evidence to suggest that this may well be the case. certainly dravidians played a massive part of teh IVC but due to their lack of other historical achievements,leaves a massive question mark over them,simple reasoning will attest to this,great peoples continually make great civilisations.identifying great civis with negros is all the rage,empower the failed?

  • @RobertJayMatthews do ur research properly before making loud(and stupid) statements.lack of other historical achievements from Dravidians?Have u heard about the Cheras,the Cholas,The Pandyas or at least the Vijayanagar Empire? You will find enough about them on the net and remember....all those achievements were of a time when the so called 'torchbearers of human civilisation' were still reeling from the hang-over of the dark ages!

  • Comment removed

  • @ramji23ary

    The ancient singer praises the god who "destroyed the Dasyans and protected the Aryan colour." [ Rg.V. III.34.9 ] [ Ann. 114 ] and "the thunderer who bestowed on his white friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the waters." [ Rg.V. I.100.18 ] [ Ann. 114 ] Numerous are the references to "the black skin" `Krishnam Vacham' [ RgV. IX.41.1, Sam.V. I.491, II.242 ] [ Ann. 114 ] which is mentioned with abhorrence.

    MAYBE THIS WILL REJOG YOUR MEMORY

  • @RobertJayMatthews Dear friend, referring to rig veda does not prove

    your point. There are many evidences which show that vedas were written by people who lived in Indus-Saraswati basin, and vedas do not refer

    to any people coming from outside. There are no separate races of Aryans and Dravidians - all Indians are of Caucasian race. So-called scholars seem to

    have read too much into the color differences of north and south Indians, may be

    for their vested interests (so as to divide & rule).

  • @none7178 Indians are Caucasians?LMAO closing your eyes will make it dark only for you.There are 2 separate races of Indians namely Indo-Aryan and Dravidian.Most of India is now a mixed race but still there are more or less pure forms of both races found in India.The dark skinned Dravidians were the very same people who were branded as Asuras and demons and were despised throughout the ages.

    If India is to flourish ..the only way is to keep united...but not through lies. Such unity wont last.

  • @tigerpoosha

    thanks for the well thought out reply to none7178.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more