dam, for a moment I thought this was real. But after only 10 seconds, when this guy sayd he's working on a theory of everything, i can tell he's a total ignorant quack.
@geshbeddin Magnetic monopoles bind all things together to create matter and all forms of energy. they have a magnetic charge. Static charges don't exist.
@jaloken Thanks for the compliment. Howard Johnson wrote The Secret World of Magnets which goes beyond the conventional way of thinking about magnetic fields.
Also, you are surely aware there isn't a need for magnetic monopoles to travel from the N to the S pole in order to create a magnetic field? When you set up an electrical potential difference between charged plates there is no movement of charges between plates; yet you still get electric field lines going from one plate to the other.
You demonstrated the principle where moving charges generate magnetic field, and moving magnets generate electric field. This being said, proving the existence of a magnetic monopole isn't that simple. Because for a surface enclosing a magnetic monopole, the integral of magnetic flux B crossing through the surface does not vanish, so a magnetic monopole can be shown to exist this way. Your demonstration is quite insufficient.
The problem we have in the physics community today is that everyone tries to connect one theory to another, this approach will never work.
The end result of all experiments are not whats in question, its the explanation
I say again the standard model uses many elementary particles and String theory uses many dimensions. My theory uses monopoles and the law of attraction. Imagine fore a moment there are monopoles, then look at the other videos I have posted and ask yourself if they exist.
Very informative, but you say that they definitely exist. From my own knowledge I know that they are hypothetical and predicted by string theory and are being researched at CERN.
What makes you so sure that they exist indisputably?
@doorwindow7 The laws of physics we know today are inaccurate. If you could answer all known phenomena in the universe just by using monopoles and the law of attraction I would have to say they exist. The standard model uses many elementary particles and string theory has many dimensions.
@nornd I like this theory you have shown, but the laws of physics are inaccurate? I'd have to say that I disagree, not only because the laws have been proven empirically and that string theory - and all subsequent theories associated - have not been proven currently. The distances we are talking about are so infinitesimally small (smaller than quarks) that to prove the existence of strings, gravitons, magnetic monopoles we have to use atom smashers which has not found the existence of them yet.
I understand your reasoning, a theory of everything should logically have a conclusive model which is incredibly simple. Though i must argue that just because string theory is extremely complex and hard to comprehend, it doesn't mean it isn't reality. Existence doesn't have to make complete sense to the human mind, physics has proved before that our perspective is very limited, for example the Uncertainty Principle and all of its expansions in quantum physics don't make "physical sense".
I understand your reasoning, a theory of everything should logically have a conclusive model which is incredibly simple. Though i must argue that just because string theory is extremely complex and hard to comprehend, it doesn't mean it isn't reality. Existence doesn't have to make complete sense to the human mind, physics has proved before that our perspective is very limited, for example the Uncertainty Principle and all of its expansions in quantum physics don't make "physical sense".
@nornd Wow. So you are saying the laws of Physics are innacurate? So the fact of an ever constant velocity unless being acted upon baffles you? The idea that there is an equal and opposite reaction to every reaction flabbergasts you? Pfft. Back on topic though, How on earth can you possibly and conclusivley deduce that monopoles absolutely exist? Simple answer, you can't. CERN is currently investigating the HYPOTHETICAL monopoles which support superstring theory. You sir should wake up!
@ECPproductions100You misunderstood, The underlying principal is inaccurate, not the law itself. Monopoles do exist, because using them offers the simplest explanation, unlike the standard model with its many elementary particles or string theory with its many dimensions.
@N4CR5 If it were that obvious to science we would have already accepted and incorporated monopoles into Physics. I hate to tell you that it is just not that simple! Im not saying monopoles dont exist but I am saying that this video is wrong and cannot prove the existence of monopoles.
Most mainstream science is a religion. Until they work with Scalar Electromagnetics like the Russians do, they're doomed. Higgs Boson ain't coming to the party, because it's simply scalar EM. We can't explain it so we'll just write it out of the equation? That's the attitude most of our basic calculations are based upon.
@nornd I think you are mistaking the individual poles of a dipole for a monopole. You say in the video that "each atom is a dipole, with it's own north and south monopole". This is simply not true. Atoms are dipoles (as are the individual electrons, protons and neutrons), but the magnetic poles of an atom can not exist independant from eachother like the electric charges can (removing the electron from the proton in hydrogen for example).
the wiki of explaining monopole is too complex. The theory of everything, too me is the free energy/ perpetual motion that identifies the self. IF the soul is forever existing, then free energy is also forever existence. And this will lead in a explosion of knowledge of light.
Great video...but...you should not call this a new idea or "your" idea. I believe this knowledge has been accessible to some people for centuries. Anyway, if you search Ed Leedskalnin "Magnetic Current" you will see that the idea has, at least, been around since 1945. It may interst you as well to research and find out what Ed made.
Brilliant and thank you for the time to make this video! I've been researching how to make a permanent monopole myself since having the opportunity to see one of these supposedly impossible devices demonstrated to me. Obviously the person who made it will not tell me how to do so... I am learning for myself just like him. No physics text book will tell you as 'they' can only make them for a millionth of a second supposedly.
Electrons are monopole point sources, for conventional science to say we can't make monopoles is ridiculous.
N4CR5 3 days ago
dam, for a moment I thought this was real. But after only 10 seconds, when this guy sayd he's working on a theory of everything, i can tell he's a total ignorant quack.
zer0dahero 1 month ago
Very Informative. Thank you.
den2003 2 months ago
Look up "SPIN ICE" on wikipedia ;)
QuadniverousBeast 2 months ago
i wonder if you can use this theory to completly change the oposite way of the earths rotation , what would happen than?
promotimes10 6 months ago
if it is all magnetic monopoles make a magnetic field from a static charge!
then i and others may have a reason to except what is being tought here.
geshbeddin 8 months ago
@geshbeddin Magnetic monopoles bind all things together to create matter and all forms of energy. they have a magnetic charge. Static charges don't exist.
nornd 8 months ago
/watch?v=ROPhQCaKLeo
oxiigen 10 months ago
Comment removed
PHOTOIK 10 months ago
I believe that this is " The Truth The Whole Truth and nothing but the Truth!"
coldshot5555 1 year ago
Check out Howard Johnson's work on magnets mapping, John 'Bedini's video on the Kromrey Converter, and Rodin's video on making a monopole magnet.
instantproducts 1 year ago
@instantproducts
you are a smart man! Howard Johnson was the king!
jaloken 1 year ago
@jaloken Thanks for the compliment. Howard Johnson wrote The Secret World of Magnets which goes beyond the conventional way of thinking about magnetic fields.
instantproducts 1 year ago
nice
sickdeathshappen 1 year ago
Also, you are surely aware there isn't a need for magnetic monopoles to travel from the N to the S pole in order to create a magnetic field? When you set up an electrical potential difference between charged plates there is no movement of charges between plates; yet you still get electric field lines going from one plate to the other.
krosUrgewalt 1 year ago
You demonstrated the principle where moving charges generate magnetic field, and moving magnets generate electric field. This being said, proving the existence of a magnetic monopole isn't that simple. Because for a surface enclosing a magnetic monopole, the integral of magnetic flux B crossing through the surface does not vanish, so a magnetic monopole can be shown to exist this way. Your demonstration is quite insufficient.
krosUrgewalt 1 year ago 2
The problem we have in the physics community today is that everyone tries to connect one theory to another, this approach will never work.
The end result of all experiments are not whats in question, its the explanation
I say again the standard model uses many elementary particles and String theory uses many dimensions. My theory uses monopoles and the law of attraction. Imagine fore a moment there are monopoles, then look at the other videos I have posted and ask yourself if they exist.
nornd 1 year ago
Very informative, but you say that they definitely exist. From my own knowledge I know that they are hypothetical and predicted by string theory and are being researched at CERN.
What makes you so sure that they exist indisputably?
doorwindow7 1 year ago
@doorwindow7 The laws of physics we know today are inaccurate. If you could answer all known phenomena in the universe just by using monopoles and the law of attraction I would have to say they exist. The standard model uses many elementary particles and string theory has many dimensions.
nornd 1 year ago
@nornd I like this theory you have shown, but the laws of physics are inaccurate? I'd have to say that I disagree, not only because the laws have been proven empirically and that string theory - and all subsequent theories associated - have not been proven currently. The distances we are talking about are so infinitesimally small (smaller than quarks) that to prove the existence of strings, gravitons, magnetic monopoles we have to use atom smashers which has not found the existence of them yet.
doorwindow7 1 year ago
@nornd
I understand your reasoning, a theory of everything should logically have a conclusive model which is incredibly simple. Though i must argue that just because string theory is extremely complex and hard to comprehend, it doesn't mean it isn't reality. Existence doesn't have to make complete sense to the human mind, physics has proved before that our perspective is very limited, for example the Uncertainty Principle and all of its expansions in quantum physics don't make "physical sense".
Ju105 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nornd
I understand your reasoning, a theory of everything should logically have a conclusive model which is incredibly simple. Though i must argue that just because string theory is extremely complex and hard to comprehend, it doesn't mean it isn't reality. Existence doesn't have to make complete sense to the human mind, physics has proved before that our perspective is very limited, for example the Uncertainty Principle and all of its expansions in quantum physics don't make "physical sense".
Ju105 1 year ago
@nornd Wow. So you are saying the laws of Physics are innacurate? So the fact of an ever constant velocity unless being acted upon baffles you? The idea that there is an equal and opposite reaction to every reaction flabbergasts you? Pfft. Back on topic though, How on earth can you possibly and conclusivley deduce that monopoles absolutely exist? Simple answer, you can't. CERN is currently investigating the HYPOTHETICAL monopoles which support superstring theory. You sir should wake up!
ECPproductions100 4 days ago
@ECPproductions100You misunderstood, The underlying principal is inaccurate, not the law itself. Monopoles do exist, because using them offers the simplest explanation, unlike the standard model with its many elementary particles or string theory with its many dimensions.
nornd 4 days ago
@ECPproductions100
Ever heard of an electron? Point source monopole.
N4CR5 3 days ago
@N4CR5 If it were that obvious to science we would have already accepted and incorporated monopoles into Physics. I hate to tell you that it is just not that simple! Im not saying monopoles dont exist but I am saying that this video is wrong and cannot prove the existence of monopoles.
ECPproductions100 3 days ago
@ECPproductions100
Electron Spin?
Magnetism?
Gravity?
You'll have a similar answer i guess?
Most mainstream science is a religion. Until they work with Scalar Electromagnetics like the Russians do, they're doomed. Higgs Boson ain't coming to the party, because it's simply scalar EM. We can't explain it so we'll just write it out of the equation? That's the attitude most of our basic calculations are based upon.
N4CR5 2 days ago
You should come and work with us on our research and development team here on Orcas Island..you should read my conclusions on Magnetic Frequency
Magnetmotorman 1 year ago
Have you looked it Ed Leedskalnins work?
Very relevant to what you're doing here....
Good vid btw ... thanks for the upload :)
bardistass 1 year ago
What does a monopole look like, or imagined to be ?
dan020350 1 year ago
@dan020350 A monopole is a sphere, it's also the smallest particle.
nornd 1 year ago
@nornd If a monopole is a sphere, then what is a dipole ?
dan020350 1 year ago
@dan020350 A dipole can be anything which has a north and south magnetic pole.
nornd 1 year ago
@nornd I think you are mistaking the individual poles of a dipole for a monopole. You say in the video that "each atom is a dipole, with it's own north and south monopole". This is simply not true. Atoms are dipoles (as are the individual electrons, protons and neutrons), but the magnetic poles of an atom can not exist independant from eachother like the electric charges can (removing the electron from the proton in hydrogen for example).
Turgor 1 year ago
@Turgor Surplus monopoles are what create the N/S poles of a dipole. A large surplus of north monopoles will create the north pole of a dipole.
nornd 1 year ago
the wiki of explaining monopole is too complex. The theory of everything, too me is the free energy/ perpetual motion that identifies the self. IF the soul is forever existing, then free energy is also forever existence. And this will lead in a explosion of knowledge of light.
dan020350 1 year ago
Can yo put a little about yourself? Like your degress and where did you study
johndragonrider88 1 year ago
what ????????you are a little off look at marko rodin
masonmia 2 years ago
Great video...but...you should not call this a new idea or "your" idea. I believe this knowledge has been accessible to some people for centuries. Anyway, if you search Ed Leedskalnin "Magnetic Current" you will see that the idea has, at least, been around since 1945. It may interst you as well to research and find out what Ed made.
MrAnguswangus 2 years ago
Brilliant and thank you for the time to make this video! I've been researching how to make a permanent monopole myself since having the opportunity to see one of these supposedly impossible devices demonstrated to me. Obviously the person who made it will not tell me how to do so... I am learning for myself just like him. No physics text book will tell you as 'they' can only make them for a millionth of a second supposedly.
N4CR5 2 years ago