Comandante Che, usted no ha muerto. Usted vive en cada ser humano que se preocupa, trabaja, y lucha por el bienestar de los mas necesitados. Venceremos, hasta la victoria siempre.
Batista was the thug. If you lead an armed rebellion you have to use some force. Castro behaved very well against all his opponents. Why? Cause he had to show the Cuban people that he wasn't just an other thug craving power.
I'm sorry, but Che was a revolutionary marxist thug. He enjoyed killing people, was hateful, and ruthless. Great friends with Castro. You don't have to take my word for it, as I'm sure you won't if all you've been told is that he was some sort of romantic poet, military genius, intellectual. Some sort of pop culture cult has been built around him, which is hard to break. But, try Wikipedia.
American ignorance will prevail, but if you want to know more about history lets see, what about Hiroshima and Nagasaki mm oh, oh, I know, I know: Vietnam! oh oh I know, I know: Bosnia and Herzegovina, am I forgetting something?...oh yeah Iraq.
Now who's actually enjoying killing people?
I will recommend you to find out more about your history before posting any comments.
So who is the killer, hateful and ruthless with innocents? notice that: innocents civilians!
Yes, I know about that too, but pointing out atrocities committed by US foreign policy doesn't really address the issue of whether or not Che was a revoluntionary Marxist thug who enjoyed killing people himself. It's a convenient distraction in a debate, but doesn't really help address the matter at hand. Still waiting for an intelligent, thoughtful reply. So far only name calling and distraction. What will be the next creative move of those who love Che? hmmmm
Just to make things clear I don't think Guevara is a saint there is a lot of things that I'm aware he committed in the name of "Freedom", as I know the atrocities committed by people in the US government also in the name of "Freedom" with the difference that they have puppets that commit this acts for them. In the end everyone wants to save the world imposing their ideals. So is not a question of communism or capitalism it's a question of incompatibility of ideas.
What I do believe is that every Political figure leaves a legacy behind him, either good or bad, and I think that, this legacy should be taken as example of what to do and what not to do; all this for the benefit of the people, and I know this is an utopia and I know that this will never happened until the leaders of the world accept that every model of government should be directed to the enrichment of the human factor.
It doesn't matter if it was Guevara or Carter the truth most be revealed and we will find passages of the life of any political figures that are going to disturbed us. Let's teach the new generations the truth and don't go around it. Teach them the benefits and disadvantages of capitalism and also the failed demonized communism and the beneficial examples that we could get from its failure.
@Ray4Life1 He treated his enemy well. Not like Batista. Now Batista was the thug. If you lead an armed rebellion you have to use some force. Castro behaved very well against his opponents. Why? Cause he had to show the Cuban people that he wasn't just an other thug craving power.
@nihal92 He is the eternal Revolutionary. He fought for the freedom of humanity and gave up his life. He is 'resurrected' and lives forever in the hearts and minds of those who fight for justice and freedom.
This has been flagged as spam show
Comandante Che, usted no ha muerto. Usted vive en cada ser humano que se preocupa, trabaja, y lucha por el bienestar de los mas necesitados. Venceremos, hasta la victoria siempre.
holaforistas 1 year ago
Batista was the thug. If you lead an armed rebellion you have to use some force. Castro behaved very well against all his opponents. Why? Cause he had to show the Cuban people that he wasn't just an other thug craving power.
janerikkvalheim 1 year ago
Glad that murderer got his day.
MrHairyNutz 2 years ago
and another one bites the dust... read a book please
Albertini234 2 years ago
damn right another one bites the dust LoL
MrHairyNutz 2 years ago
American smugness suxx big hairy balls.
Breedvg 3 years ago
No it doesn't. :) "smiley face"
cguevara12 2 years ago
how can i get this video? i want to use it for a class project.
milw515 3 years ago
I use the Firefox plug-in YouPlayer to download it. But there are a lot of other ways, search on the net ;)
nihal92 3 years ago
Ernesto was born in the wrong century. He would have made an excellent viking berserker.
666Nukes 3 years ago
I'm sorry, but Che was a revolutionary marxist thug. He enjoyed killing people, was hateful, and ruthless. Great friends with Castro. You don't have to take my word for it, as I'm sure you won't if all you've been told is that he was some sort of romantic poet, military genius, intellectual. Some sort of pop culture cult has been built around him, which is hard to break. But, try Wikipedia.
giantsuckingsound 3 years ago
callate puto
cololpda 3 years ago 2
American ignorance will prevail, but if you want to know more about history lets see, what about Hiroshima and Nagasaki mm oh, oh, I know, I know: Vietnam! oh oh I know, I know: Bosnia and Herzegovina, am I forgetting something?...oh yeah Iraq.
Now who's actually enjoying killing people?
I will recommend you to find out more about your history before posting any comments.
So who is the killer, hateful and ruthless with innocents? notice that: innocents civilians!
Think about it and read more
BelievedontBelieve 3 years ago 2
Yes, I know about that too, but pointing out atrocities committed by US foreign policy doesn't really address the issue of whether or not Che was a revoluntionary Marxist thug who enjoyed killing people himself. It's a convenient distraction in a debate, but doesn't really help address the matter at hand. Still waiting for an intelligent, thoughtful reply. So far only name calling and distraction. What will be the next creative move of those who love Che? hmmmm
giantsuckingsound 3 years ago
Just to make things clear I don't think Guevara is a saint there is a lot of things that I'm aware he committed in the name of "Freedom", as I know the atrocities committed by people in the US government also in the name of "Freedom" with the difference that they have puppets that commit this acts for them. In the end everyone wants to save the world imposing their ideals. So is not a question of communism or capitalism it's a question of incompatibility of ideas.
BelievedontBelieve 3 years ago
What I do believe is that every Political figure leaves a legacy behind him, either good or bad, and I think that, this legacy should be taken as example of what to do and what not to do; all this for the benefit of the people, and I know this is an utopia and I know that this will never happened until the leaders of the world accept that every model of government should be directed to the enrichment of the human factor.
BelievedontBelieve 3 years ago
It doesn't matter if it was Guevara or Carter the truth most be revealed and we will find passages of the life of any political figures that are going to disturbed us. Let's teach the new generations the truth and don't go around it. Teach them the benefits and disadvantages of capitalism and also the failed demonized communism and the beneficial examples that we could get from its failure.
BelievedontBelieve 3 years ago
The pop culture is unimportant, Castro is a revolutionary hero, he was an anti-capitalist hero, and he executed people during war time.
Stop getting your news from Rush Limbaugh.
Ray4Life1 3 years ago
@Ray4Life1 He treated his enemy well. Not like Batista. Now Batista was the thug. If you lead an armed rebellion you have to use some force. Castro behaved very well against his opponents. Why? Cause he had to show the Cuban people that he wasn't just an other thug craving power.
janerikkvalheim 1 year ago
Hasta la victoria siempre comandante!!!
tu ejemplo iluminara por siempre a los hombres que luchan por la causa libertaria de america latina ayer, hoy y siempre.
julianrug 3 years ago
i wonder if they talked about him after they assasinated him...that is why che is an icon now because he fought and died for freedom.RIP my friend
futuramark 3 years ago 2
I totally agree ;)
nihal92 3 years ago
@nihal92 He is the eternal Revolutionary. He fought for the freedom of humanity and gave up his life. He is 'resurrected' and lives forever in the hearts and minds of those who fight for justice and freedom.
janerikkvalheim 1 year ago