Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it would take more energy inpput than energy output.

  • @vaidotas86

    google 'anellotech'

  • Comment removed

  • @mpctheg This is a fallacy in the extreme. The discussion at hand is about energy containing compounds on the Earth's surface. Not elements. Not outer space. Because our fuel infrastructure revolves around carbon compounds, we should be looking for sustainable sources of carbon. As plants are the ONLY sustainable source of carbon, it is to our advantage to learn how to convert them into fuels we can readily use.

  • This is gonna make a lot of money!

  • There are some Major gaps in information in this segment.

  • im working on a similar project here in New Zealand. the biggest issue in progress is money. damn researchers and their government funding

  • yeah, but H2 can also be used as a fuel, and guess what. it's the most abundent element in the fuckin' universe! wake up people!!

  • @mpctheg

    Indeed, RIP Stan Meyer.

  • @mpctheg fuckin A!

  • Could I get information about this company?

  • I want to invest

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more