really? wow. but seriously for a movie of that length it was pretty much all just talking. there was barely any action and i found myself thinkin omg when is this going to be over?!
dark knight was longer I believe. Andd a movie full of action are usually the ones 12 year olds jizz themselves over. Now, I like action movies, but stupidly always action ones and no good acting, (for example, G.I.JOE and Transformers) are just stupid. I like talking movies with a few action (for example, Pulp Fiction).
now i agree with that, but watchmen had just short like 5 minute bursts of action like three times. and yea the acting was good but with so little action and sooooo much just talking it didnt really even out. i never saw dark knight because i despise batman. no i know a bunch of fan boys will probly bad mouth me for that but oh well is my opinion. but i think the action should have good acting too. but watchmen was supposed to be action. but i think action and non action should be about 70%/30%
Watchmen was a good movie
Darkassasin18 2 years ago 2
"You can't replace a good story with technology, y'know." Ooh I wish George Lucas had this in mind when making the new trilogy.
klominator 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
watchmen was probably one of the worst movies ive EVER seen. definate waste of 2+ hours
beastabuelos 2 years ago
fuck you.
notoriouslynx 2 years ago 2
really? wow. but seriously for a movie of that length it was pretty much all just talking. there was barely any action and i found myself thinkin omg when is this going to be over?!
beastabuelos 2 years ago
dark knight was longer I believe. Andd a movie full of action are usually the ones 12 year olds jizz themselves over. Now, I like action movies, but stupidly always action ones and no good acting, (for example, G.I.JOE and Transformers) are just stupid. I like talking movies with a few action (for example, Pulp Fiction).
notoriouslynx 2 years ago
now i agree with that, but watchmen had just short like 5 minute bursts of action like three times. and yea the acting was good but with so little action and sooooo much just talking it didnt really even out. i never saw dark knight because i despise batman. no i know a bunch of fan boys will probly bad mouth me for that but oh well is my opinion. but i think the action should have good acting too. but watchmen was supposed to be action. but i think action and non action should be about 70%/30%
beastabuelos 2 years ago
I don't believe watchmen should of been action. It was post-action. It was like a "behind the stars" superheroes edition.
notoriouslynx 2 years ago
i see what you mean but they made it out to be an action movie
beastabuelos 2 years ago
Amen
whitefoxfilms 2 years ago
He owns because you can actually see whats going on in his movies. Very good editing done and everything.
Unlike that piece of hellish trash gi joe. And a couple of the bourne movies. Shaky zoomed in cameras FTL
CFrostyTheSnowman 2 years ago 3
Dawn of the Dead was pretty bad, lost the concept of the original.
3kToT 2 years ago
WATCHMEN ROCKSSSS!!!!!!
notoriouslynx 2 years ago 8
naked blue supermen ftw
CFrostyTheSnowman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
...300 Sucked.
LOKIUNCIA 2 years ago
Go wired. Mr. Snyder gives good advice.
wolffenhaus 2 years ago 2