It is remarkable how a nation of just 9 million people can make such fantastic military equipment. For you hater, Sweden makes the Gotland class sub, the quietist submarine in service today. The US NAVY leased the Gotland and crew for 2 full years, trying to figure out how to detect it. It sank the US Carriers in all the simulated war games without ever being detected. Go Sverige! And Hail Pippi Langstrump
that doesn't mean the F-22 stops flying. It only means they're not built anymore. Why are the Sweds making such a big deal out of landing on a road? the the road is long ang good enough (like the ones they use in Sweden), any plane can do that in any country.
Yes the F-22 is better. But note: it is mainly used for air to air, not air to ground and the costs of the plane are far higher. Don't know what the Gripen would be capable of at the price.
@EliteGhost001 The point is it doesnt need very long roads at all, neither do they need to be very wide. Check out the STOL capabilities and you see why.
my ass, if its a tarmac strip fir enough for a gripen, an F-18 can do the same tric. So will a Eurofighter, an SU-34 or any other plane with a bit stronger landing gear.
Sweden is on of the few, if not the only, country that uses ''normal'' roads (they're still whider and flatter then any other normal road in sweden. I know cause I go to Sweden almost every year...
So its basicly a short runway. Realy.. any modern fighter which can land within the same distance as a Gripen can land on it.
@EliteGhost001 dude sweaden have some roads specially designed for airplanes to land on... any modern airplane can land on those... what a gripen can do is that it can land on almost any road... and no a normal fighter CANT do that.. look it up
you folks realy don't get it do you? If the road is good to land on and the landing gear is strong enough ANY plane can land on that road. Its NOT something special Sure not every plane can do it but its not something that is only for the Gripen. Get over it...
now that's a comment that makes sence. But the plane can still land. The runway won't break instantly so it does not prohibit the plane to land. And if it the road does wear out,it can be easily fixed. The other planes are at least 2 tons heavier (EMPTY).
@EliteGhost001 The most common hard surface types of airport pavements are Asphalt and Concrete. These pavements are SPECIALLY constructed to withstand the high pressure of landings. Heavier aircraft may land on normal road but dangerous to take off again using the same 'runway'. Road damaged by pressure of aircraft landing can't be fix easily.
"the most commen hard suface types of airport pavements are asphalt and concrete..."
Yes, so are roads. "These pavemens are specially constructed to withstand the high pressure.." Yes, that's what I ment by thicker layers. The mixture isn't much different. (I know because I study that kinda stuff on the university). Why would it be dangerous taking off from the same runway? The damafe isn't instant, only after some time and CAN be easily fixed. But the Gripen does have an advantge
@hulabula 13 thanks for the email.I didnt know saab was making jets in the 40's.What was the jet called that they built?By the way i am american, but i do not think every piece of american millitary equipment is the best in the world.The Gripen is an amazing jet no doubt,but if u compare it to the f22 your being naive.
this is a good jet but not comparable with the u.s. f 22.The comment from str8erthanu has some merit but ur talking about only 1 plane & i dont know if the grippen is better than f 35.Might b but its the best jet saab or sweeden has made.The f35 is not americas premiere jet.Anyway saab is mainly a car manufacture lockheed martin is soley a defense contracter that only builds millitary hardware.Therefore they have a richer tradition and more experience building high quality jets.
@verko9 well, actually, it´s to seperate companies, SAAB Aero, was the first "SAAB" company, and they only build Airplanes, and from that company SAAB automovtive was created. so... SAAB is Primarily a Defence contractor. and they have been making Fighter planes since 1942.
btw, Problemet med SD är att dom vill ha ut ALLA invandrare. Jag har inget emot invandrare, men pga Mona sahlin så har vi massinvandring. Plus att bara Södertälje har tagit emot fler irakiska flyktingar än Hela USA.
Invandring= bra
massinvandring= dåligt.
Fast eftersom SD är de enda som är emot massinvandringen och vill återuppbygga försvaret så tycker jag man ska rösta på dom.
JAS 39 Gripen is one of the best planes in the world. Much longer distance, faster speed and higher quality than the shitty americas plane that norway bought. The reason JAS 39 crashed during show/test flying is Completely qoincidence.
And the F35 and JAS 39 is both multitask planes. They serve for same tasks, just that americans wont admit that sweden, or other countrys, have better tech than the US. ( not everything but much)
@str8erthanu Compare JAS 39 and Raptor F-22 and lets see if Gripen got the upperhand. You will be shocked because you really think Gripen is the best.
fy fan va nice om sverige demokraterna skulle ta makten över sverige. bort med invandrare. svenskar hatar invandrare nuförtiden. håppas alla åker ut. för jag har nämligen lite problem med invandrare
Och en sak till... Rösta på Svergie demokraterna 2010... Inte för dem tar bort invandrare... Men dem har sagt att dem kommer förstärka försvarsmakten enormt som den en gång var... Så plz rösta på dem så e du snäll för utan militär vem fan ska försvara oss?; )
you cant compare F35 with Jas 39 Gripen because they are made for two diffrent things F35 to fight in america and the 39 Gripen to protect and diffend Sweden
On eof the best planes flying our skies. Together with the Mirage Rafale and the Eurofighter.
They don't need stealth. They have speed, reliability, affordable prieces and will out number all of those so called 5th generation planes like the f-22, f-35, su-35,...
THey didnt buy it cause theyre still angry that Sweden betrayed them during WW2 and didnt choose "side" and stayed neutral, but it would look stupid if they siad that so they made up this shit story of that the american aircrafts were better and cheaper and then they said that they hade calculated the cost completly wrong when Sweden investigated the prie of the aircrafts
the reason norway didn't, was either thy are to stupid to calculate correctly, thy where off by 50% on the price evaluation thy made. or thy are corrupt and did the mistake on purpose
when this is after you, its over.
transcan321 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is remarkable how a nation of just 9 million people can make such fantastic military equipment. For you hater, Sweden makes the Gotland class sub, the quietist submarine in service today. The US NAVY leased the Gotland and crew for 2 full years, trying to figure out how to detect it. It sank the US Carriers in all the simulated war games without ever being detected. Go Sverige! And Hail Pippi Langstrump
melsody 3 months ago
I love JAS 39 GRIPEN
It's amazing fighter a nicer the F-22 or some SU. Thx from Czech Republic.
MegaK4rl 3 months ago 7
This plane eats F-16s for breakfast :)
Iskall91 5 months ago
Amazing how easy this aircraft can fit so well, into NATO's air operations!!!
MrJeffreydunson 6 months ago
tunnan, draken, viggen and of course gripen.. SAAB is the only one who got alien intervention.. (of course there is no alien exist.. damn hollywood!)
asifadio 7 months ago
NICE! MEN ÄNDO SU 27 SKA KNULLA DEN HAR METALT!
xXxxWARNINGxXx 8 months ago
I'm proud to be Swedish when I see this in the sky.
0Tanaka0 9 months ago
@0Tanaka0 HEHE,IAM PROUD TO SEE IN THE SKY MIG29,SU27 AND SUKHOI T50 ;))) WHAT IAM THAN? GISSA!
xXxxWARNINGxXx 8 months ago
@HerrFlickofdGestapo Thanks very much for this. I have been looking for it for many years.
ERSCAUS 9 months ago
Anyone know the name and artist of the song that accompanies this flight?
ERSCAUS 9 months ago
Mig35>gripen....
STALKERBooka 10 months ago
?>euro fighter>gripen>migs...
zvastianx 11 months ago
music- delerium- silence then kernkraft- zombie nation
mattyboy7071 11 months ago
The Gripen is designed to chase you out of the sky, locate you on the ground, and then bomb the crap out of you XD
TheXLink 1 year ago
i like the song!, who is the artist?
CINNDIRELLA 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What's the name of the first song?
timeofplayer11 1 year ago
thailand buy.
thong2137 1 year ago
i've seen it in real life! It was flying right over us!
mikael971117 1 year ago
I like this plane! :D
cadwaele 1 year ago
how nice it use short distance of it's taking off, even through the road is available.
tongpeter2010 1 year ago
Jas 39 royal thai air force is waiting for you
kidsadakonruaikrabue 1 year ago
@Stormwern
that doesn't mean the F-22 stops flying. It only means they're not built anymore. Why are the Sweds making such a big deal out of landing on a road? the the road is long ang good enough (like the ones they use in Sweden), any plane can do that in any country.
Yes the F-22 is better. But note: it is mainly used for air to air, not air to ground and the costs of the plane are far higher. Don't know what the Gripen would be capable of at the price.
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 The point is it doesnt need very long roads at all, neither do they need to be very wide. Check out the STOL capabilities and you see why.
InfomaniacJack 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 The F22 is not same "class" of fighter jet as the JAS, they shouldnt be compared since they are designed for different tasks.
ThePharaohBender 1 year ago
@ThePharaohBender
yea no shit.. I've been saying that for a long time. So at what comment are you replying?
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 gripen is the only modern plane in the world capable of landin on normal roads ^^
TheSwekebab 1 year ago
@TheSwekebab
my ass, if its a tarmac strip fir enough for a gripen, an F-18 can do the same tric. So will a Eurofighter, an SU-34 or any other plane with a bit stronger landing gear.
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 i bet they could but they couldent do is safe... i dont think that swe would make a big deal abaut it if every plane could ^^
TheSwekebab 1 year ago
@TheSwekebab
Sweden is on of the few, if not the only, country that uses ''normal'' roads (they're still whider and flatter then any other normal road in sweden. I know cause I go to Sweden almost every year...
So its basicly a short runway. Realy.. any modern fighter which can land within the same distance as a Gripen can land on it.
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 dude sweaden have some roads specially designed for airplanes to land on... any modern airplane can land on those... what a gripen can do is that it can land on almost any road... and no a normal fighter CANT do that.. look it up
TheSwekebab 1 year ago
@TheSwekebab
you folks realy don't get it do you? If the road is good to land on and the landing gear is strong enough ANY plane can land on that road. Its NOT something special Sure not every plane can do it but its not something that is only for the Gripen. Get over it...
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 f/a-18 hornet / super hornet and most fighter jets not suitable to land on normal road. too heavy, will destroy the road.
capespring 1 year ago
@capespring
now that's a comment that makes sence. But the plane can still land. The runway won't break instantly so it does not prohibit the plane to land. And if it the road does wear out,it can be easily fixed. The other planes are at least 2 tons heavier (EMPTY).
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@capespring
and on the other hand, what you say is not true.
Since a road is made out of the exact same material as a runway, it does not matter.
Although the thickness may differ (probably will)
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 The most common hard surface types of airport pavements are Asphalt and Concrete. These pavements are SPECIALLY constructed to withstand the high pressure of landings. Heavier aircraft may land on normal road but dangerous to take off again using the same 'runway'. Road damaged by pressure of aircraft landing can't be fix easily.
capespring 1 year ago
@capespring
"the most commen hard suface types of airport pavements are asphalt and concrete..."
Yes, so are roads. "These pavemens are specially constructed to withstand the high pressure.." Yes, that's what I ment by thicker layers. The mixture isn't much different. (I know because I study that kinda stuff on the university). Why would it be dangerous taking off from the same runway? The damafe isn't instant, only after some time and CAN be easily fixed. But the Gripen does have an advantge
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
@EliteGhost001 are you working in this industry?
capespring 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@capespring
Look again at my last comment and make up your mind.
EliteGhost001 1 year ago
*don't
Stormwern 1 year ago
@hulabula 13 thanks for the email.I didnt know saab was making jets in the 40's.What was the jet called that they built?By the way i am american, but i do not think every piece of american millitary equipment is the best in the world.The Gripen is an amazing jet no doubt,but if u compare it to the f22 your being naive.
verko9 1 year ago
this is a good jet but not comparable with the u.s. f 22.The comment from str8erthanu has some merit but ur talking about only 1 plane & i dont know if the grippen is better than f 35.Might b but its the best jet saab or sweeden has made.The f35 is not americas premiere jet.Anyway saab is mainly a car manufacture lockheed martin is soley a defense contracter that only builds millitary hardware.Therefore they have a richer tradition and more experience building high quality jets.
verko9 2 years ago
@Verco9 of course you say f 22 is better becouse its made in the US and you are from the US
Kallefisa 1 year ago 3
@Kallefisa F-22 is better. And im Swedish
metalpounder 1 year ago
@verko9 well, actually, it´s to seperate companies, SAAB Aero, was the first "SAAB" company, and they only build Airplanes, and from that company SAAB automovtive was created. so... SAAB is Primarily a Defence contractor. and they have been making Fighter planes since 1942.
hulabula13 1 year ago
@verko9 SAAB is mainly a car manufactorer? They made military aircraft when your granddad was a baby.
ThePharaohBender 1 year ago
the euro fighter is going badly, the rafale is a good plane but is in heavy competition with the f 35, F16 and the saab is leading
pmtad 2 years ago
I wish Switzerland will choose this one :) Maybe I'll fly it in this case !
mathieuplaneur 2 years ago 11
@mathieuplaneur F 16 block 52+/60 is better and cheaper at a time.
MrThorn88 6 months ago
@MrThorn88 Newest "16s" is worse both in BVR combat and dogfighting
oviatb 2 months ago
@oviatb Marry Christmas
MrThorn88 2 months ago
btw, Problemet med SD är att dom vill ha ut ALLA invandrare. Jag har inget emot invandrare, men pga Mona sahlin så har vi massinvandring. Plus att bara Södertälje har tagit emot fler irakiska flyktingar än Hela USA.
Invandring= bra
massinvandring= dåligt.
Fast eftersom SD är de enda som är emot massinvandringen och vill återuppbygga försvaret så tycker jag man ska rösta på dom.
str8erthanu 2 years ago 3
JAS 39 Gripen is one of the best planes in the world. Much longer distance, faster speed and higher quality than the shitty americas plane that norway bought. The reason JAS 39 crashed during show/test flying is Completely qoincidence.
And the F35 and JAS 39 is both multitask planes. They serve for same tasks, just that americans wont admit that sweden, or other countrys, have better tech than the US. ( not everything but much)
str8erthanu 2 years ago
@str8erthanu Compare JAS 39 and Raptor F-22 and lets see if Gripen got the upperhand. You will be shocked because you really think Gripen is the best.
metalpounder 1 year ago
Comment removed
ellozarios 1 year ago
@metalpounder 2 difrent concepts, cant compare them.
maintance costs of Raptor´s stealth paint are higher then all Sweedens (& most of the worlds) military budget......
ellozarios 1 year ago
@ellozarios I can compare who is better overall.
metalpounder 1 year ago
fy fan va nice om sverige demokraterna skulle ta makten över sverige. bort med invandrare. svenskar hatar invandrare nuförtiden. håppas alla åker ut. för jag har nämligen lite problem med invandrare
alimamma121 2 years ago
Nej men grymt med lite mer militär insatser i landet xD
Stiflerm92 2 years ago 2
Och en sak till... Rösta på Svergie demokraterna 2010... Inte för dem tar bort invandrare... Men dem har sagt att dem kommer förstärka försvarsmakten enormt som den en gång var... Så plz rösta på dem så e du snäll för utan militär vem fan ska försvara oss?; )
Stiflerm92 2 years ago
um.... fattar du hur det här landet skulle se ut då? >.>
findingnemoes 2 years ago
Jag ska rösta på SD! inte bara pga av stor invandring.. jag vill ha tillbaka vårat försvar!
Ermaxproductions 2 years ago
what's the name of the 1st song
Videowatcher198 2 years ago
what is this song?
606WinteR 2 years ago
The best planes that fly wright now are :
Eurofighter , JAS39 and Rafalle.
America had only 2 true fighters in my opinion:
F18 Hornet and F14 Tomcat (retired ) .
F22 and JSF are nice toys with nice LCD's. Too expensive ... few pcs's....
ROMANIA20008 2 years ago
Next to come is the Gripen NG (Next Generation).
XR6Charged 2 years ago
what is Gripen NG?
sweJN 2 years ago
Next generation Gripen. The new one. Being tested as we speak. Longer ranger, greater payload etc.
XR6Charged 2 years ago
the name of that JAS is super JAS i think.
sweJN 2 years ago
Havent read about it in a few weeks or so. Ye that would make sense.
XR6Charged 2 years ago
you cant compare F35 with Jas 39 Gripen because they are made for two diffrent things F35 to fight in america and the 39 Gripen to protect and diffend Sweden
ronneby5 2 years ago
Yes and also Gripen is a Gen 4.5 and the JSF is a Gen 5 aircraft. But they both are multirole.
XR6Charged 2 years ago
On eof the best planes flying our skies. Together with the Mirage Rafale and the Eurofighter.
They don't need stealth. They have speed, reliability, affordable prieces and will out number all of those so called 5th generation planes like the f-22, f-35, su-35,...
RubenCraninx 2 years ago
nice :P
ehm147 2 years ago
THey didnt buy it cause theyre still angry that Sweden betrayed them during WW2 and didnt choose "side" and stayed neutral, but it would look stupid if they siad that so they made up this shit story of that the american aircrafts were better and cheaper and then they said that they hade calculated the cost completly wrong when Sweden investigated the prie of the aircrafts
Bl3sshope 2 years ago
anyway: they have to pay for a better plane soon. F-35 will not live up to its promises. It will be very expensive.
Rapeattack 2 years ago
euro fighter is 58 mil and F35 will be in the 50mil price range
it also depends on what model of the F35 u buy
NickyH55 2 years ago
what is the song at 4:24 called :)
ronneby5 2 years ago
Zombie Nation kernkraft 400
Allstarkurokawa 2 years ago
its a reason why th norwegian didnt bougth the jas gripen.. they are ikea quality...
xdollarg 2 years ago
the reason norway didn't, was either thy are to stupid to calculate correctly, thy where off by 50% on the price evaluation thy made. or thy are corrupt and did the mistake on purpose
2canines 2 years ago
even that good? The only thing that norwegians can make are cheesecutters, and the only country using them is sweden. hahaha
Fudo94 2 years ago
well the Cheescutter is a very famous thing, made by Sweden, not norway
bonda95 2 years ago
There are many countrys who are using the 39 Gripen But it is made in Sweden
ronneby5 2 years ago
@xdollarg Yeah right, IKEA quality. Enjoy your outdated F16 jets mate.
ThePharaohBender 1 year ago
I'm personaly not a fan of single-engined delta-winged aircraft or some with canards, but for some reason I like this plane's simplicity.
NewbeFeaster 2 years ago 13
Hey are the Saabs gona get the JHMCS?
XR6Charged 3 years ago
Is nice! They should have some camo ones man would look sick. Desert camo mmmm.
XR6Charged 3 years ago
would LOVE to see it in full HD!
theboltski 3 years ago
wot dat song ???
iamwesel 3 years ago
DAMN! beautiful video mate! amazing!
bittemeinrammstein 3 years ago 2
Tusan Tak for the Upload
kashifypn 3 years ago
Nice one .
Timothy Venkat
TimVenkat 3 years ago
A nice video presentation to show Swedish superiority in air power.Tak.
Timothy Venkat
TimVenkat 3 years ago
:-)
KurtGnu 3 years ago