I GOT THE 25MB HOPE THAT SHIT FLY'S I HAVE TO WAIT 20 DAYS FOR THE TECH TO COME AND INSTALL FUCKEN BULL SHIT AND THEY HAVE THE WORST CUSTOMER SERVICE EVER
@pivot1004 There are a lot of things involved with getting the service setup. Be glad if you get the service. They could say you have to get a slower tier. U-Verse isn't going to be around in a 5-10 years.
@JunitoNH lmao? Um at 1.4 kbps is easily translated to mb. Also kbps is still used on a lot of sited due to upload speeds still being lower than a mb in most households in the US
Nice video! AT&T Uverse is actually a fiber to the node service. Which means, is only fiber once it reachs a Node. From there it reliase on old copper wiring to reach such home. Uverse, is pretty much ADSL.
@KatiushaVN4 incorrect Verizon FiOS works differently and uses a completely different system this is why U-verse can only attain 18 mb/s and FiOS can go up to 150 mb/s
@kirbyyasha I wouldn't take cable internet as that is a double edged sword if you live in a big city. I prefer having a T1 or T3 connection, FiOS next, then U-Verse.
@MrWasian I live close to Chicago, but not in it. And I always have blazing fast speeds with Comcast. I've had it back when it was TCI@Home, then AT&T Broadband, then Comcast. They keep making my speeds faster, but my price remains the same with my Triple play. I've been out of promo for awhile, and not too long ago they swapped my modem free of charge to a DOCSIS3.0 proactively.
@kirbyyasha I've lived in San Diego, if you get cable their even with the massive bandwidth they have at certain points of the day, you might be better using dial-up. As for AT&T their speeds on their Internet are rather low in comparison to FiOS, it always will be. FiOS is completely fiber whereas U-verse is not, U-verse will use copper lines when their fiber will not reach a destination directly. AT&T's fiber network is relatively small, compared to FiOS
@c0wz As far as I'm concerned, not really. We've had an American from Seattle, WA come by and he said things here are much cheaper than in his hometown. Although our incomes are somewhat lower, though, we're still living a great life here.
Over 20% of the population lives in absolute luxury, legally or.. illegally... but that's another matter. (I'm living a pretty much normal life.)
If you want to visit Romania, a ton of us know atleast a bit of English, although not many comprehend it.
@TheBetaFox many other countries have great internet speeds like what you mentioned but the cost of living is higher. it is good to know that there are places where you don't have to go broke for the higher speeds.
@c0wz But the highest Internet speeds in the world are in Sweden, where the average ISP offers speeds from 100Mbps/10Mbps to 1Gbps/1Gbps and some even 10Gbps/1Gbps if I'm right. (the largest annual LAN party there is going to have 100Gbps soon) 10Gbps is still experimental around here, and 1Gbps is not very popular, although the price is just 2x the price of my current connection.
Some ISPs take advantage of low popularity of high speeds here to say that their slow speeds are the highest.
I wasnt familiar with what uverse max 18 is when I was originally watching this video, and therefore was slightly disappointed by the results...but now that I see it's an AT&T dsl upgrade...that's actually pretty impressive....I'm running 42 Mbps down and 12Mbps up on the same site with verizon fios...but comparing dsl to fiber optic is kinda apples and oranges lol
@xbox360gamer21 Oh....in that case that speed is terrible....it's like using GTX580ti's to render mario brothers...wtf....AT&T needs to just save some face and bow out of the competition if that's their fiber optic speed.
@HeresYourSign1 Yeah, well, It tends to be the only fiber Optic around in more Rural Areas. Tis the only reason I am getting it instead of Verizon FIOS. Verizon wants $5,000 to extend it about 300 feet down the road to my house...
nice speed at&t has come a long way since dsl. at the moment i have brighthouse's 20 Mb/s down n 2Mb/s up . so far the best speed they offer is 40Mb/s down n 5Mb/s up! insane!
how much you pay? also i play games(ps3) would you recommend at&t as a decent internet that does the job it will be my first time i will connect my ps3 to internet and i want a no lag thing if you know what i mean i hate the NAT crap
@6BLuE6DemoN6 if you have a decent router NAT would not cause any problems. AT&T works fine for online gaming as long as you have a good installation and nobody else is using your internet connection when you are playing games. There is increased latency but it is less than 50ms usually. PS3 and XBOX360 games usually notice it the worst and that is mostly because they are less forgiving with lag. Computer games have far fewer problems with latency than console games.
@6BLuE6DemoN6 if you are really concerned about lag, i would suggest you get cable internet. Although with cable internet your connection can slow down during peak hours.
I paid $55/month for 18mbps internet. I have 12mbps internet now and pay $48/month.
@c0wz can you get internet with no TV because i only see plans right now that require you to get the bundle and i just want the 45$/month u-verse max internet?
@c0wz do you know how much they will charge to install it i know they have to come and install it and can you get the bundle and disconnect the TV the next day lol yeah i am rude but i just want the internet and the router is OK right? because i seen pics and the box is huge lol
@c0wz if the router that is provided by at&t is good for the job than that's all i need just don't want nat issues and lag isn't much of a deal if the people you play with got decent connection so thanks for you're help and continue your work = )
@MexicanLeaderTaco it has to do with the technology used to get your internet access to you. if you have fiber optic internet brought to your home most likely you will have far better upload speeds than cable or dsl.
its not fiber optic. its fiber optic until the last 1000-3000 ft to your home. if they did total fiber then they would have to dig up your driveway. the last 1000 feet is a single pair copper cable. if your home is greater than 3k feet then they will use 2 twisted pairs called "pair bonding" since twisted pairs lose quality after 3000ft. Its basically att's cheap way to compete with cable. as long as it works im okay with it. =]
higher upload rates are used for servers that need to send files out not in. I no with u verse they make you sign a paper saying your not using this to run a business. and that is what you would need better upload speeds for. you would have to call your isp and see what they have.
@itscool1968 caps are not for bandwidth hogs. you use what you pay for. no one can use more than what they pay for. legally anyways. and downloading 24/7 is not against the law. so capping your service should be illegal. that is, unless they tell you upfront when you order it.
What kind of ping do you have with this? I have the service in Florida but going from normal DSL to this upped my latency, what is yours? I'm usually a sad 109 120 ping now.
@TheMuslumPedophile yea. thats because U-Verse uses an interleaved profile. fastpath is not available on u-verse. if your getting lousy latency for gaming, i suggest finding a closer server. i'm from chicago and get about 50-60ms to a chicago server on battlefield: bad company 2.
@phoneix91 whoopdedoo. so you can look at porn faster than I can. who cares. I'm demoing a product in this video. I'm not saying its better than anything else.
Comcast would be better because there is less latency. That will provide smoother gameplay. I play TF2, L4D, and Battlefield:Bad Company 2 for PC just fine on U-Verse though.
@phoneix91 you have resnet. you pay a hell of a lot more for your connection than I do. You don't even have a residential internet service, i'm confused why you even commented on this video.
@Digitalstorm007 you are wrong. the 24 mbps tier has 3 mbps upload speeds.. and FiOS is not available in areas where U-Verse is available. AT&T and Verizon do not share territories.
For reference: on 18 or 24 mbps, make sure you are testing with the set tops in stand-by for best results. Most issues I see with slow speed tests are with members trying it with all 4 streams in use and 5 computers using torrents or some crap...
Also, if you are in Southern Florida, sorry, your backbone there sucks, please stop blaming Uverse ;)
Their internet offering is actually quite good, I did support for them for a few months on a contract and also had the service at home. A lot of factors will effect your speed, the main one being loop length or how far away you are from the boxes in your neighborhood. The gateway is tricky and should be rebooted at least once a week in my opinion to clear out all the firewall logs and such. They can pull the history as long as you haven't factory reset it. The speed is quite impressive tho.
I have max 18 and it was 16-17 mbs at first and now I'm getting between 5-6. Don't know what happened but its been like this for months now and I have had this servise for like 8 months
@c0wz There's a modem with U-verse? It's fiber right to your house so it should be a fiber line that runs to an ONT, where the fiber is spliced and turns into cat-5, or that's how the company I work for does its FTTH (Fiber to the home) network.
@Bioready there are 2 versions of U-Verse. FTTH and FTTN. The FTTH has an ONT. I have FTTN. FTTN from what I understand is the most common form of U-Verse. I have what they call a Router Gateway. I don't want to jazz it up but it looks just like a huge modem. will some links to pictures in the description.
@c0wz I see. It was described to me as FTTH, but I can see how FTTN would be more efficient for the company.. From what I understand though that wouldn't be dissimilar from what Cox does around here with their cable system, they run fiber to nodes and apartment buildings and neighborhoods share the bandwidth going through the node. It's more cost-effective than FTTH but I imagine if too many people subscribe there'd be problems with bandwidth, especially since its all IP instead of IP and RF.
@Bioready The difference between cable internet and DSL-styles of internet which is what U-Verse ultimately is is that with DSL the bandwidth is not shared. There is plenty of bandwidth to go around with U-Verse. They have a lot of fiber going to their nodes, which are called VRADs(link in description) and the bandwidth is not shared between customers.
I've read that most VRADs have about 5-7 fiber lines run to them. The ones that are turned on and in use are usually run at 1Gbps
@c0wz I know that, but if it's fiber it's not DSL. It's.. fiber. No modems should be needed, but when you told me they issue you a "router gateway".. that's a router, not a modem. But I don't want to argue semantics here. And I'm well aware of how much bandwidth should, in theory, be available. But no matter how much should be available, there will always be a need for more eventually as their subscription base increases. I don't foresee it being a problem anytime soon though.
@Bioready To elaborate, the bandwidth may not be shared for each customer, as in there's a direct line to their house from the VRAD. But it does have a trunk line that will run to another piece of equipment. If you have too many subscribers on one VRAD, that trunk will be more heavily taxed and it's possible to be overloaded regardless.
sorry I have AT&T elite DSL now. I would imagine it works as advertised. The 2 U-Verse tiers that I used worked fine. I had U-Verse Max and Max 18 when I had U-Verse.
i have atnt service elite whatever and i can't even load this video all the way it would take like 12 minutes probably more and suprised u replyed back someone has msn!
lol i know my download speed is like 2.01mb/s right now it can watch videos just slow but i know if i call them they won't do shit and say its some problems here but its not
wow, your so lucky. I have wireless internet from a local provider, and its so slow. After 5 MB, the download will drop from about 150 kb/sec to 50 kb/sec. I remember when i had comcast, i had such awesome speeds!!
Amazing how your ping between East & West US is nearly bad as Europe/Asia
More like GL with imbalanced PVP = 60 vs 30 or 12 vs 7 Bloody gulch(haha). Waste your time lvling just to get to the higher pvp then new expansion lol. Once the expansions are out for a while the ppl in wow dissipate. Every new patch = new bugs. Every new expansions = all your good shits now shit.
Game was excellent 1 - 60, BC wasn't that bad .. complete shit now.
I was happy with the service when I had it. I have since moved away from the service area. The speeds were consistently within 20% of what was advertised. I tried every tier they had within the year that I had the service.
i should also say that I dropped that TV service not because I was dissatisfied with the service. I just have never had TV in my budget. It worked as advertised for me but I just don't watch enough TV to be able to justify the expense. if that is even possible.
This service looks to be very close to providing the speed I get from Mediacom Online Max cable internet. Max advertises 20Mbit. On Speedtest to Chicago server I get 18Mbit/s+ DL, and usually right at 1.6Mbit/s UL.
What I'm more angry about with these places is how they rape you of upload bandwidth. I have to upload digital photography to an FTP site for my work, and poor upload speeds really upset me. If I could find faster upload at the cost of slower download, I would switch instantly.
I used to live in Iowa and had Mediacom Max also. speed and latency it was very close, but U-Verse is by far more stable. on U-Verse I would get the same speeds all day long. mediacom max it would vary during prime time.
FIOS and Uverse are running the same technology on similar lines. It's just marketing rights in different regions that decides whether it's ATT or Verizon selling it to you. Neither is DSL so get over that.
FiOS, is not dsl. U-Verse is dsl. you my friend are very wrong. they are definitely not the same technology. I do not know where you got that idea from. FiOS has speeds over 18Mbps and U-Verse does not. if they are the same technology then why is the huge difference in speed there?
FiOS is a lot faster it uses 100% fiber optic lines and deliver them straight to your home but uverse is better for people who are comfortable with speeds under 18mbps as their service is a little cheaper than both fios and comcast at the speeds of 12mbps-18mbps
the difference is that where fios is getting put in there really isn't anything there for verizon, so they have to put it in themselves, where as uverse is fiber to the node and then runs standard to the home. with fios, verizon has to put fiber to the house because they don't have existing lines. later in the future uverse will run fiber to the house and be just as fast or faster than fios, but for now, fios is faster.
It's too exspensive to run fiber everywhere and the technology of the hardware hasn't caught up to make having the fiber an advantage. Verizon took a huge risk and it flopped. Better luck next time!
comcast is awesome.. if you like your speed to fluctuate all the time. speedboost just hides the fact that they don't meet the bandwidth requirements for most of their customers.
bingo...read all cable compinies fine print...speedboost or whatever name they add is only for the first 10mb or so of a download...when your neighbors use their internet or their VOD, etc your speed drops drastically...FTTP baby Verizon FiOS...UVerse is FTTN i'm not too keen on it but it's much better than cable...
you know, that's the smartest thing developers and AT&T and and Verizon could do...fiber is the future and has extreme growth potential so roll it out and make it the new standard...
Yea it be nice. Qwest, another company, develepor, and city got in on one subdivision and made it fiber all the way to the modem. qwest laid the fiber, brought it to the house, builder ran fiber to the main media panel, and directly into a fiber fed modem. thing is that the service was so expensive that most people didn't get it. but it gave HIGH speeds at much cheaper then any broadband available.
that's just awesome...we're a total broadband society tv, internet, you name it we're in the fast lane requiring more and more access and speed and accessibility...god bless fiber optics...lol...it just needs to be done...i'm glad Qwest, Embarq, and Verizon have all made commitments to roll out FTTP as far and wide as they can...
that is one of their services...my main point is that qwest is working and planning with developers and buillders to install FTTP and run fiber right into the home of each new subdivision / tract community that is build within their operating area...that's important...that's the future...clear digital fiber from CO to the residence ...
The fiber isn't faster just because it's fiber. A uverse line might run 80megs to the house if it's clean, on copper. The modem caps the speed at 25megs and your walet caps the feed from there. Uverse runs on fiber to the home as well, and it's no faster there. You don't get special packages or faster rates. it's still limited by what the company wants to sell you and what the equipment in the home can support, not by the cable or fiber.
no one is saying that fiber is faster. it has a lot more room for growth compared to cable is all. please learn how to use the comment system before posting again. i don't even know what your post is in reference to.
i work for at&t and i can assure you that uverse IS dsl. It's just running through the fiber so it is capable of faster speeds. DSL is not as slow as everybody thinks and will work just fine for anyone, the speeds don't need to be huge because you aren't sharing your connection, its a Direct Subscriber Line.
So you work for AT&T and can assure everyone that it's DSL running over fiber. That is nonsense. DSL cannot not run over fiber period. DSL requires an electrical current to travel. Fiber obviously uses pulses of light. They are two separate technologies. Uverse is FTTN (fiber to the node) which is then converted and sent to individual homes via copper. IT IS NOT DSL. AT&T offers traditional DSL service but that is not Uverse. Oh and by the way Mr. Expert DSL stands for Digital Subscriber Line!
right. I hate how everyone thinks that uverse is only FTTN and can't grasp that the light is converted into electrical current (duh) and is absolutely a form of DSL.
how do you figure that the ping was 160. the ping to my the closest speed test site is 34ms. that is just fine. and 160 is just fine for online gaming.. unless your hosting a server. most ISPs don't allow you to host anything anyways. that is, unless you get business class service. and business class service costs a LOT more than $55/month.
160 ping at 0:47 San Diego. The host isn't going to be right next to your house. Anyways AT&T is DSL so that's a slap in the face right there. Cable is light years ahead of DSL. DSL is the new dial up.
reply to your messgae about charters 60 meg....Chrysler and Chevy also filed for bankruptcy. These companies do this to receive bail out loans from the government it's a money netting scheme, is all.
yea well, they had to F**k up to get in a situation to need the bail out anyways. and the only ones that you can blame for them actually getting bailed out is the idiots that got elected.
In our area Uverse is completely fibre optic ppl who have it have never hear of a phone line.
VideosByCPJM 1 month ago
@VideosByCPJM consider yourself lucky. very few U-Verse areas have the fiber optic version.
c0wz 1 month ago
I GOT THE 25MB HOPE THAT SHIT FLY'S I HAVE TO WAIT 20 DAYS FOR THE TECH TO COME AND INSTALL FUCKEN BULL SHIT AND THEY HAVE THE WORST CUSTOMER SERVICE EVER
pivot1004 2 months ago
@pivot1004 There are a lot of things involved with getting the service setup. Be glad if you get the service. They could say you have to get a slower tier. U-Verse isn't going to be around in a 5-10 years.
c0wz 2 months ago
You guys still doing kbps wow
JunitoNH 4 months ago
@JunitoNH no. not anymore. this video is 2 years old.
c0wz 4 months ago
@JunitoNH lmao? Um at 1.4 kbps is easily translated to mb. Also kbps is still used on a lot of sited due to upload speeds still being lower than a mb in most households in the US
MrWasian 3 months ago
Getting 30 megs DL & 5 megs UL with Comcast. Far superior service.
HorseheadNebula85 5 months ago 2
Nice video! AT&T Uverse is actually a fiber to the node service. Which means, is only fiber once it reachs a Node. From there it reliase on old copper wiring to reach such home. Uverse, is pretty much ADSL.
jchv88 6 months ago 2
@jchv88 VDSL2 completely different tech than ADSL
simpsonstewie 6 months ago
@simpsonstewie VDSL = Very Digital Slow Line, ADSL = Always Digital Slow Line.
I'll take Cable or FiOS over this crap any day.
kirbyyasha 4 months ago 2
@kirbyyasha
Actually U-Verse Max is FiOS
KatiushaVN4 3 months ago
@KatiushaVN4 incorrect Verizon FiOS works differently and uses a completely different system this is why U-verse can only attain 18 mb/s and FiOS can go up to 150 mb/s
MrWasian 3 months ago
@KatiushaVN4 no. no it is not FiOS. FiOS is a verizon product.
c0wz 3 months ago
@kirbyyasha I wouldn't take cable internet as that is a double edged sword if you live in a big city. I prefer having a T1 or T3 connection, FiOS next, then U-Verse.
MrWasian 3 months ago
@MrWasian I live close to Chicago, but not in it. And I always have blazing fast speeds with Comcast. I've had it back when it was TCI@Home, then AT&T Broadband, then Comcast. They keep making my speeds faster, but my price remains the same with my Triple play. I've been out of promo for awhile, and not too long ago they swapped my modem free of charge to a DOCSIS3.0 proactively.
kirbyyasha 3 months ago
@kirbyyasha I've lived in San Diego, if you get cable their even with the massive bandwidth they have at certain points of the day, you might be better using dial-up. As for AT&T their speeds on their Internet are rather low in comparison to FiOS, it always will be. FiOS is completely fiber whereas U-verse is not, U-verse will use copper lines when their fiber will not reach a destination directly. AT&T's fiber network is relatively small, compared to FiOS
MrWasian 3 months ago
this is max pro not max
wtfproductions342589 7 months ago
@wtfproductions342589 it was called 'Max 18' when I took the video
c0wz 7 months ago
@wtfproductions342589 its called Max Plus
anexr 6 months ago
It would be nice if America would invest more into its Internet-related infrastructure.
I have 150Mbps DL/100Mbps UL, with double DL speed at night (300Mbps) and free 54Mbps wireless, all at 17.5 USD/month in Bucharest, Romania.
TheBetaFox 8 months ago 2
@TheBetaFox is the cost of living in romania more than the US?
c0wz 8 months ago
@c0wz As far as I'm concerned, not really. We've had an American from Seattle, WA come by and he said things here are much cheaper than in his hometown. Although our incomes are somewhat lower, though, we're still living a great life here.
Over 20% of the population lives in absolute luxury, legally or.. illegally... but that's another matter. (I'm living a pretty much normal life.)
If you want to visit Romania, a ton of us know atleast a bit of English, although not many comprehend it.
TheBetaFox 8 months ago
@TheBetaFox many other countries have great internet speeds like what you mentioned but the cost of living is higher. it is good to know that there are places where you don't have to go broke for the higher speeds.
c0wz 8 months ago
@c0wz But the highest Internet speeds in the world are in Sweden, where the average ISP offers speeds from 100Mbps/10Mbps to 1Gbps/1Gbps and some even 10Gbps/1Gbps if I'm right. (the largest annual LAN party there is going to have 100Gbps soon) 10Gbps is still experimental around here, and 1Gbps is not very popular, although the price is just 2x the price of my current connection.
Some ISPs take advantage of low popularity of high speeds here to say that their slow speeds are the highest.
TheBetaFox 8 months ago
@TheBetaFox i pay 20$ for 80 kbps/10 up...fuck at&t =(
102000jdh102 8 months ago
@102000jdh102 you get what you pay for my friend quit being cheap and upgrade your shit
anexr 6 months ago
@102000jdh102 yeah cause i think you have the cheapest one try upgradeing might work
matix525 5 months ago
Ok ty my net is near twice the speed tho.
risseer23 8 months ago
I wasnt familiar with what uverse max 18 is when I was originally watching this video, and therefore was slightly disappointed by the results...but now that I see it's an AT&T dsl upgrade...that's actually pretty impressive....I'm running 42 Mbps down and 12Mbps up on the same site with verizon fios...but comparing dsl to fiber optic is kinda apples and oranges lol
HeresYourSign1 8 months ago
@HeresYourSign1 It isn't DSL. It is AT&T U-Verse. IT is Fiber Optic.
xbox360gamer21 8 months ago
@xbox360gamer21 Oh....in that case that speed is terrible....it's like using GTX580ti's to render mario brothers...wtf....AT&T needs to just save some face and bow out of the competition if that's their fiber optic speed.
HeresYourSign1 8 months ago
@HeresYourSign1 Yeah, well, It tends to be the only fiber Optic around in more Rural Areas. Tis the only reason I am getting it instead of Verizon FIOS. Verizon wants $5,000 to extend it about 300 feet down the road to my house...
xbox360gamer21 8 months ago
Yea nice speed for dsl,running comcast atm getting 33mbps and 7mbps up
risseer23 9 months ago
@risseer23 It isn't DSL.... it is U-Verse. IT is AT&T Fiber Optic.
xbox360gamer21 8 months ago
nice speed at&t has come a long way since dsl. at the moment i have brighthouse's 20 Mb/s down n 2Mb/s up . so far the best speed they offer is 40Mb/s down n 5Mb/s up! insane!
elPichirri 10 months ago
This is 100% what you are supposed to get on the service hope u enjoy!
ShaddoGaming 11 months ago
how much you pay? also i play games(ps3) would you recommend at&t as a decent internet that does the job it will be my first time i will connect my ps3 to internet and i want a no lag thing if you know what i mean i hate the NAT crap
6BLuE6DemoN6 1 year ago
@6BLuE6DemoN6 if you have a decent router NAT would not cause any problems. AT&T works fine for online gaming as long as you have a good installation and nobody else is using your internet connection when you are playing games. There is increased latency but it is less than 50ms usually. PS3 and XBOX360 games usually notice it the worst and that is mostly because they are less forgiving with lag. Computer games have far fewer problems with latency than console games.
c0wz 1 year ago
@6BLuE6DemoN6 if you are really concerned about lag, i would suggest you get cable internet. Although with cable internet your connection can slow down during peak hours.
I paid $55/month for 18mbps internet. I have 12mbps internet now and pay $48/month.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz can you get internet with no TV because i only see plans right now that require you to get the bundle and i just want the 45$/month u-verse max internet?
6BLuE6DemoN6 1 year ago
@6BLuE6DemoN6 you have to sign up for the bundle, get it installed, then call and cancel only the tv portion.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz do you know how much they will charge to install it i know they have to come and install it and can you get the bundle and disconnect the TV the next day lol yeah i am rude but i just want the internet and the router is OK right? because i seen pics and the box is huge lol
6BLuE6DemoN6 1 year ago
@6BLuE6DemoN6 i believe they wave the installation if you get tv+internet.
the router is pretty big but it does decent job if you just want a simple router.
send me a message and I will give you a link to a much better place for these types of answers.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz if the router that is provided by at&t is good for the job than that's all i need just don't want nat issues and lag isn't much of a deal if the people you play with got decent connection so thanks for you're help and continue your work = )
6BLuE6DemoN6 1 year ago
@c0wz is the $48 for 12mbps after taxes?
blindkids 1 year ago
@blindkids where I live there are no taxes on internet service.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz thats is freaking awesome!
Inpersona64 11 months ago
With my At&t U Verse i got a awesome 2.52 mps! yay for me
crazypete3 1 year ago
@crazypete3 you probably only subscribe to the 3mbps plan.
c0wz 1 year ago
im rocking a whopping 5 mbs download with att...
KirkRichieRamos 1 year ago
@cjl24683 whoa. thats a pretty sweet deal.
c0wz 1 year ago
Man, I wish Fios was available in my area. I would glad pay for it over uverse.
jayjjj3 1 year ago
Why is it that isp give good download speeds but shit upload.
MexicanLeaderTaco 1 year ago
@MexicanLeaderTaco it has to do with the technology used to get your internet access to you. if you have fiber optic internet brought to your home most likely you will have far better upload speeds than cable or dsl.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz Fiber Optic costs more money right?
alex054739 1 year ago
@alex054739 the service costs what people will pay. where I live it is very similar in price to cable internet.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz I like cable more then DSL, I have DSL right now and it fucked up cant play any online games just lags or crashes
alex054739 1 year ago
its not fiber optic. its fiber optic until the last 1000-3000 ft to your home. if they did total fiber then they would have to dig up your driveway. the last 1000 feet is a single pair copper cable. if your home is greater than 3k feet then they will use 2 twisted pairs called "pair bonding" since twisted pairs lose quality after 3000ft. Its basically att's cheap way to compete with cable. as long as it works im okay with it. =]
simpsonstewie 1 year ago
@MexicanLeaderTaco
higher upload rates are used for servers that need to send files out not in. I no with u verse they make you sign a paper saying your not using this to run a business. and that is what you would need better upload speeds for. you would have to call your isp and see what they have.
tappeddarkman89 1 year ago
@MexicanLeaderTaco this is also normal for residential internet providers in the united states. business as usual.
c0wz 1 year ago
mine is 40 down 20 up road runner pro the only way to go
itscool1968 1 year ago
@itscool1968 does TWC still cap their internet service?
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz only in certian towns mine isnt one of them
and mostly for bandwith hogs
itscool1968 1 year ago
@itscool1968 caps are not for bandwidth hogs. you use what you pay for. no one can use more than what they pay for. legally anyways. and downloading 24/7 is not against the law. so capping your service should be illegal. that is, unless they tell you upfront when you order it.
c0wz 1 year ago
What kind of ping do you have with this? I have the service in Florida but going from normal DSL to this upped my latency, what is yours? I'm usually a sad 109 120 ping now.
TheMuslumPedophile 1 year ago
@TheMuslumPedophile yea. thats because U-Verse uses an interleaved profile. fastpath is not available on u-verse. if your getting lousy latency for gaming, i suggest finding a closer server. i'm from chicago and get about 50-60ms to a chicago server on battlefield: bad company 2.
c0wz 1 year ago
My TCU resent connections kicks your uverse boast 18mb ass anyday of the week.
phoneix91 1 year ago
@phoneix91 whoopdedoo. so you can look at porn faster than I can. who cares. I'm demoing a product in this video. I'm not saying its better than anything else.
c0wz 1 year ago
I have comcast and I play xbox live. What is a better option for ISP?
SWAGGA5AURU5 1 year ago
Comcast would be better because there is less latency. That will provide smoother gameplay. I play TF2, L4D, and Battlefield:Bad Company 2 for PC just fine on U-Verse though.
c0wz 1 year ago
Fuck Uverse. That shit is fucking expensive.
phoneix91 1 year ago
@phoneix91 compared to?
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz i have fios internet + phone for 65 and I am getting 25 mbps down/17 mpbs up. it is awesome because i signed up for the lowest which is 15/5.
Negima1228 1 year ago
@Negima1228 I want fios so bad. its not in my area yet...
mcseprofession 1 year ago
@phoneix91 you have resnet. you pay a hell of a lot more for your connection than I do. You don't even have a residential internet service, i'm confused why you even commented on this video.
c0wz 1 year ago
Too bad 1.5Mbps is way too low of an upload. At 24Mbps service with 1.5Mbps upload, you could get Verizon Fios at 25Mbps Download and 25Mbps Upload.
Digitalstorm007 1 year ago
@Digitalstorm007 you are wrong. the 24 mbps tier has 3 mbps upload speeds.. and FiOS is not available in areas where U-Verse is available. AT&T and Verizon do not share territories.
c0wz 1 year ago
@Digitalstorm007 u fuk retard u dont know shit 25mbps Download and 25Mbps Upload. thatss the stupidis thing i have ever herd..
juan197221 1 year ago
dude wtf is this i have Uverse and i get 6 mb sec how to get this much plz tell me?
send415 1 year ago
@send415 call AT&T and ask them about upgrading your internet plan. They have 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24mbps plans.
c0wz 1 year ago
nvm
megagirlyo93 1 year ago
Those are some decent numbers there.
For reference: on 18 or 24 mbps, make sure you are testing with the set tops in stand-by for best results. Most issues I see with slow speed tests are with members trying it with all 4 streams in use and 5 computers using torrents or some crap...
Also, if you are in Southern Florida, sorry, your backbone there sucks, please stop blaming Uverse ;)
yellowtwo 1 year ago
Their internet offering is actually quite good, I did support for them for a few months on a contract and also had the service at home. A lot of factors will effect your speed, the main one being loop length or how far away you are from the boxes in your neighborhood. The gateway is tricky and should be rebooted at least once a week in my opinion to clear out all the firewall logs and such. They can pull the history as long as you haven't factory reset it. The speed is quite impressive tho.
LowRentTG 1 year ago
Verizon dsl From NY queens,
download =0.56 mbps
upload=0.37 mbps
download speed=5megabytes MP3 song =1min 35megabytes video clips =8mins 800megabytes movie = 190mins(3.16 hrs)
that's the horrible results i got.Paid for $ 31.99
tencruise 1 year ago
thats not the original song?
megagirlyo93 1 year ago
@megagirlyo93 original song?
c0wz 1 year ago
song?
megagirlyo93 1 year ago
@megagirlyo93 it says directly below the video description
c0wz 1 year ago
I have max 18 and it was 16-17 mbs at first and now I'm getting between 5-6. Don't know what happened but its been like this for months now and I have had this servise for like 8 months
SirTaz247 1 year ago
@SirTaz247 try restarting the modem.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz There's a modem with U-verse? It's fiber right to your house so it should be a fiber line that runs to an ONT, where the fiber is spliced and turns into cat-5, or that's how the company I work for does its FTTH (Fiber to the home) network.
Bioready 1 year ago
@Bioready there are 2 versions of U-Verse. FTTH and FTTN. The FTTH has an ONT. I have FTTN. FTTN from what I understand is the most common form of U-Verse. I have what they call a Router Gateway. I don't want to jazz it up but it looks just like a huge modem. will some links to pictures in the description.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz I see. It was described to me as FTTH, but I can see how FTTN would be more efficient for the company.. From what I understand though that wouldn't be dissimilar from what Cox does around here with their cable system, they run fiber to nodes and apartment buildings and neighborhoods share the bandwidth going through the node. It's more cost-effective than FTTH but I imagine if too many people subscribe there'd be problems with bandwidth, especially since its all IP instead of IP and RF.
Bioready 1 year ago
@Bioready The difference between cable internet and DSL-styles of internet which is what U-Verse ultimately is is that with DSL the bandwidth is not shared. There is plenty of bandwidth to go around with U-Verse. They have a lot of fiber going to their nodes, which are called VRADs(link in description) and the bandwidth is not shared between customers.
I've read that most VRADs have about 5-7 fiber lines run to them. The ones that are turned on and in use are usually run at 1Gbps
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz I know that, but if it's fiber it's not DSL. It's.. fiber. No modems should be needed, but when you told me they issue you a "router gateway".. that's a router, not a modem. But I don't want to argue semantics here. And I'm well aware of how much bandwidth should, in theory, be available. But no matter how much should be available, there will always be a need for more eventually as their subscription base increases. I don't foresee it being a problem anytime soon though.
Bioready 1 year ago
@Bioready it is VDSL from the RG to the VRAD if you are on the FTTN product. FTTH is a fiber product.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz I see... Didn't know that. That explains perfectly why they only offer up to 18 mbps download on their internet then.
Bioready 1 year ago
@Bioready actually now they have a 24mbps tier. i made this video a year and a half ago.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz Even still, the company I work for runs FTTH and offers up to 60, but I see why now.
Bioready 1 year ago
@Bioready To elaborate, the bandwidth may not be shared for each customer, as in there's a direct line to their house from the VRAD. But it does have a trunk line that will run to another piece of equipment. If you have too many subscribers on one VRAD, that trunk will be more heavily taxed and it's possible to be overloaded regardless.
Bioready 1 year ago
@Bioready that trunk is typically 10Gbps ethernet. they will not oversell a vrad.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz All that matters now is that I have U-Verse and it's freaking sick! :P
Bioready 1 year ago
@SirTaz247 Call At&t and get tech out. Should be consistent speed all the time.
dtbrown1978 1 year ago
how much you pay for internet?
AdiPL2009 1 year ago
@AdiPL2009 $45/month
c0wz 1 year ago
they have max turbo now at 24 mbps
simpsonstewie 1 year ago
@c0wz oh okay just making sure it wasn't bad thanks!
RyaNx559 1 year ago
@c0wz oh how come you switched to DSL?
RyaNx559 1 year ago
@RyaNx559 I moved and it was not available at my new house.
c0wz 1 year ago
@c0wz is the uverse elite good because we are looking into it? thanks :)
RyaNx559 1 year ago
sorry I have AT&T elite DSL now. I would imagine it works as advertised. The 2 U-Verse tiers that I used worked fine. I had U-Verse Max and Max 18 when I had U-Verse.
c0wz 1 year ago
Lol nice music xD
lXxMasterShakexXl 1 year ago
@lXxMasterShakexXl youtube did that ha
c0wz 1 year ago
i have atnt service elite whatever and i can't even load this video all the way it would take like 12 minutes probably more and suprised u replyed back someone has msn!
lXxMasterShakexXl 1 year ago
@lXxMasterShakexXl i'm on AT&T elite service now. i replied on my phone which is on T-Mobile.
c0wz 1 year ago
oh rofl xD
lXxMasterShakexXl 1 year ago
You have elite and u cant load this video???
somethings wrong then because i have the shittiest speed they have to offer and the video loads just fine.
I ordered the elite and the new modems coming this Monday!! 6 mbps, 10 times faster than what I have now.
bagelisdelish 1 year ago
lol i know my download speed is like 2.01mb/s right now it can watch videos just slow but i know if i call them they won't do shit and say its some problems here but its not
lXxMasterShakexXl 1 year ago
just look at here speedtest . net / global
my country is ranked 5 :D
ninusanje 1 year ago
i got here in romania max 141 mbps
ninusanje 1 year ago
i believe it. the United States sucks for broadband service.
c0wz 1 year ago
Im not even kidding my download speed is the exact opposite of where yours is
xxsolidsteelxx 1 year ago
wow, your so lucky. I have wireless internet from a local provider, and its so slow. After 5 MB, the download will drop from about 150 kb/sec to 50 kb/sec. I remember when i had comcast, i had such awesome speeds!!
vampyfan2 1 year ago 2
@vampyfan2 sorry to hear that.
c0wz 1 year ago
haha the song made me hyper! woot woot iluv itt hahhaaa<3!!
AlexTheDorkk 1 year ago
@AlexTheDorkk glad you like it :)
c0wz 1 year ago
I have Road Runner, 10 Mb down.
Nogard229 2 years ago
DOCSIS 3.0 Owns Uverse, Let see them offer 50MB Down 10 UP like comcast.
DiscountKiller 2 years ago
@DiscountKiller And Comcast gives you a 250gb cap whereas U-Verse has no cap. So you get to burn through your cap faster, joy!!!
lionheartkms 2 years ago
really uverse hass no capss????!!!?
AlexTheDorkk 1 year ago
What program is this?
kilagon10 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
DOCSIS 3.0 is up and running in some WOW hubs... BYE BYE uVerse.
rothfest 2 years ago
@rothfest
good luck with wow lol
Updates every thursday at 12am
connection drops for 1-2 hours
TheDigitalMac 2 years ago
Amazing how your ping between East & West US is nearly bad as Europe/Asia
More like GL with imbalanced PVP = 60 vs 30 or 12 vs 7 Bloody gulch(haha). Waste your time lvling just to get to the higher pvp then new expansion lol. Once the expansions are out for a while the ppl in wow dissipate. Every new patch = new bugs. Every new expansions = all your good shits now shit.
Game was excellent 1 - 60, BC wasn't that bad .. complete shit now.
Only thing cool about WoW was the Auction House.
Sicj 2 years ago
Hello Sir, Was watching your U-VERSE Speed Test Video.
I Saw The Multiple Results.
Wish to ask you if your Satisfied with U-Verse Internet Service.
Also, Are The Upload & Download Speeds All That AT&T Claim To Be.?
sheradio1055 2 years ago
I was happy with the service when I had it. I have since moved away from the service area. The speeds were consistently within 20% of what was advertised. I tried every tier they had within the year that I had the service.
c0wz 2 years ago
i should also say that I dropped that TV service not because I was dissatisfied with the service. I just have never had TV in my budget. It worked as advertised for me but I just don't watch enough TV to be able to justify the expense. if that is even possible.
c0wz 2 years ago
Thanks For Your Reply.
I Was just looking into Verizon FIOS , and It Seems Quite Impressive.. Too Bad FIOS is NoWhere Near My Area..Neither is U-Verse
sheradio1055 2 years ago
This service looks to be very close to providing the speed I get from Mediacom Online Max cable internet. Max advertises 20Mbit. On Speedtest to Chicago server I get 18Mbit/s+ DL, and usually right at 1.6Mbit/s UL.
What I'm more angry about with these places is how they rape you of upload bandwidth. I have to upload digital photography to an FTP site for my work, and poor upload speeds really upset me. If I could find faster upload at the cost of slower download, I would switch instantly.
jr9950 2 years ago
I used to live in Iowa and had Mediacom Max also. speed and latency it was very close, but U-Verse is by far more stable. on U-Verse I would get the same speeds all day long. mediacom max it would vary during prime time.
c0wz 2 years ago
FIOS and Uverse are running the same technology on similar lines. It's just marketing rights in different regions that decides whether it's ATT or Verizon selling it to you. Neither is DSL so get over that.
IndianaAbsentee 2 years ago
FiOS, is not dsl. U-Verse is dsl. you my friend are very wrong. they are definitely not the same technology. I do not know where you got that idea from. FiOS has speeds over 18Mbps and U-Verse does not. if they are the same technology then why is the huge difference in speed there?
c0wz 2 years ago
FiOS is a lot faster it uses 100% fiber optic lines and deliver them straight to your home but uverse is better for people who are comfortable with speeds under 18mbps as their service is a little cheaper than both fios and comcast at the speeds of 12mbps-18mbps
MrMj357 2 years ago
the difference is that where fios is getting put in there really isn't anything there for verizon, so they have to put it in themselves, where as uverse is fiber to the node and then runs standard to the home. with fios, verizon has to put fiber to the house because they don't have existing lines. later in the future uverse will run fiber to the house and be just as fast or faster than fios, but for now, fios is faster.
DWproductions07 2 years ago
FIOS is also bankrupt and won't be around within a year. Take it to the bank.
IndianaAbsentee 2 years ago
Really.. that doesnt sound right! Fios has a good product too!
JuseJamez 2 years ago
It's too exspensive to run fiber everywhere and the technology of the hardware hasn't caught up to make having the fiber an advantage. Verizon took a huge risk and it flopped. Better luck next time!
IndianaAbsentee 2 years ago
FIOS is the largest implementation of fiber in the country for residential use. it is not a flop
c0wz 2 years ago
and Verizon is not bankrupt. i don't know where you get that crazy idea from.
c0wz 2 years ago
im so jealous i just did a speed test ... 64 kbs i had to watch that meter shoot up even if it was on someone else's computer haha
TRAVISinRENO 2 years ago
verizon sucks.
Comcast is awesome.
tkandme3 2 years ago
comcast is awesome.. if you like your speed to fluctuate all the time. speedboost just hides the fact that they don't meet the bandwidth requirements for most of their customers.
c0wz 2 years ago
bingo...read all cable compinies fine print...speedboost or whatever name they add is only for the first 10mb or so of a download...when your neighbors use their internet or their VOD, etc your speed drops drastically...FTTP baby Verizon FiOS...UVerse is FTTN i'm not too keen on it but it's much better than cable...
Alprazolam 2 years ago
Uverse is mainly FTTN, Fiber fed to a DSLAM then sent over copper to the premise, BUT in newer subdivisions they are running it FTTP when possible.
Steelwind88 2 years ago
you know, that's the smartest thing developers and AT&T and and Verizon could do...fiber is the future and has extreme growth potential so roll it out and make it the new standard...
Alprazolam 2 years ago
Yea it be nice. Qwest, another company, develepor, and city got in on one subdivision and made it fiber all the way to the modem. qwest laid the fiber, brought it to the house, builder ran fiber to the main media panel, and directly into a fiber fed modem. thing is that the service was so expensive that most people didn't get it. but it gave HIGH speeds at much cheaper then any broadband available.
Steelwind88 2 years ago
that's just awesome...we're a total broadband society tv, internet, you name it we're in the fast lane requiring more and more access and speed and accessibility...god bless fiber optics...lol...it just needs to be done...i'm glad Qwest, Embarq, and Verizon have all made commitments to roll out FTTP as far and wide as they can...
Alprazolam 2 years ago
last i heard qwest was doing FTTN. which is pretty much the same thing as U-Verse
c0wz 2 years ago
that is one of their services...my main point is that qwest is working and planning with developers and buillders to install FTTP and run fiber right into the home of each new subdivision / tract community that is build within their operating area...that's important...that's the future...clear digital fiber from CO to the residence ...
Alprazolam 2 years ago
The fiber isn't faster just because it's fiber. A uverse line might run 80megs to the house if it's clean, on copper. The modem caps the speed at 25megs and your walet caps the feed from there. Uverse runs on fiber to the home as well, and it's no faster there. You don't get special packages or faster rates. it's still limited by what the company wants to sell you and what the equipment in the home can support, not by the cable or fiber.
IndianaAbsentee 2 years ago
no one is saying that fiber is faster. it has a lot more room for growth compared to cable is all. please learn how to use the comment system before posting again. i don't even know what your post is in reference to.
c0wz 2 years ago
i work for at&t and i can assure you that uverse IS dsl. It's just running through the fiber so it is capable of faster speeds. DSL is not as slow as everybody thinks and will work just fine for anyone, the speeds don't need to be huge because you aren't sharing your connection, its a Direct Subscriber Line.
DWproductions07 2 years ago
So you work for AT&T and can assure everyone that it's DSL running over fiber. That is nonsense. DSL cannot not run over fiber period. DSL requires an electrical current to travel. Fiber obviously uses pulses of light. They are two separate technologies. Uverse is FTTN (fiber to the node) which is then converted and sent to individual homes via copper. IT IS NOT DSL. AT&T offers traditional DSL service but that is not Uverse. Oh and by the way Mr. Expert DSL stands for Digital Subscriber Line!
matpolley 2 years ago
Actually U-verse is VDSL, Very high bit-rate DSL, so check yourself foo!
nielsont 2 years ago
right. I hate how everyone thinks that uverse is only FTTN and can't grasp that the light is converted into electrical current (duh) and is absolutely a form of DSL.
jferra87 2 years ago
ouch. chicago. One of the worst cities in the country.
Move to Philly. Philadelphia is amazing, and you'll get faster speeds, since people actually live there and it's a better city.
tkandme3 2 years ago
AT&T Sucks! Comcast has 16 mbps plus 2 mbps power boost. for 55, and the ping is no where near 160. Better for online gaming and hosting
Saberek 2 years ago
how do you figure that the ping was 160. the ping to my the closest speed test site is 34ms. that is just fine. and 160 is just fine for online gaming.. unless your hosting a server. most ISPs don't allow you to host anything anyways. that is, unless you get business class service. and business class service costs a LOT more than $55/month.
c0wz 2 years ago
160 ping at 0:47 San Diego. The host isn't going to be right next to your house. Anyways AT&T is DSL so that's a slap in the face right there. Cable is light years ahead of DSL. DSL is the new dial up.
Saberek 2 years ago
At&t Uverse is fiber optic so... yeah you're wrong. Kind of ironic since you mention "light" speed.
jperdomo 2 years ago
Verizon FIOS is actually the fastest out there. Comcast offers wideband in certain places in the U.S. which is 50 mbps upload and 10 mbps upload.
Verizon FIOS get's way faster than 50 mbps download and 20 mbps upload speed.
wolverine22blue 2 years ago
reply to your messgae about charters 60 meg....Chrysler and Chevy also filed for bankruptcy. These companies do this to receive bail out loans from the government it's a money netting scheme, is all.
fossilsnotgospels 2 years ago
yea well, they had to F**k up to get in a situation to need the bail out anyways. and the only ones that you can blame for them actually getting bailed out is the idiots that got elected.
c0wz 2 years ago
My fastest was 16536 but when i moved around the corner im only averiging 8000, and im only getting a 250 upload. Brisbane Australia
halo3guyy 2 years ago
I wish the upload was faster though, in my part of Houston, we only have Comcast and ATT. : (
nerdydesi 2 years ago
Do you pay like $174/Month?
antonioquijano23 2 years ago
nope. this is only $65/month
c0wz 2 years ago