I remember watching this clip and later hearing bush say it was a 757. I knew instanty America was no longer free and democratic. I also remember later seeing that pussy Jamie McIntyre retract his words on some tv show.
Lying twooftard bastard! Why are you posting an edited down version of the original report? Why did you cut out the parts where he talks about plane parts?? Did you not want us to hear that part?? Well, here is the original report with out the editing. Listen to the Jamie Mcintyre talk about plane parts at about :30
@xxBIGKING2xx Why are you so angry? If you are so worked up over people that are seeking answers with a different opinion than you, are you sure you are helping? Even yourself? I suggest you take a little time off, read a book, go fishing on your own on a nice day and enjoy the silence. Read Desiderata. I don't know what a twooftards is, but your anger stops me from caring. You see the video you posted is apx 15 mins later when Jamie was told the official version. So uh, what's that about liars?
@answerswithquestions So that's your response? Standard twooftard reply straight from the Handbook. "Anyone that can prove you wrong was in on it' (page 2 I'm told). Just how lame are you morons going to get? If all you can do is make shit up to cover the holes in your fairy tales, you need to get a new conspiracy theory to push. I heard the UFO people are looking for help.
Why am I angry? I hate liars! (especially bad ones)
@answerswithquestions ""You see the video you posted is apx 15 mins later when Jamie was told the official version."" - Pure fantasy. Just like the rest of your so called 'truth' movement. When you idiots come up with something that you can present in a courtroom, you let me know. Until then, you're just blowing smoke and you know it.
@xxBIGKING2xx ,, big plane yet small hole ???? where did the engines go??? did they neatly fold up and follow the planes bpdy through the 1 hole in the building,, ,, something isnt right here,, put down your pizza and open your eyes
Smh. You truthers are ignorant. You take no account of the 110+ people who witnessed the Pentagon attack with their own eyes. Every one of them said it was a plane, not a missile, a plane. Plus there are pictures of debris found all over the crash site. Do research before you say such lies.
Easy enough to believe it was a plane when eyewitnesses of those that saw it hit, say it was a plane. Most plane crashes we are used to occur when the pilot is attempting to safely decelerate and save the craft and save lives. Planes are thin aluminum skin, for fuel economy. A thin metal tube at hundreds of miles per hour driven into concrete will disintegrate. Leaving, like in PA, a very unfamiliar accident scene that we're not used to seeing. Very little debris.
Show me evidence of that happening! Show me one video where a 767 disappears after the crash. Actually, you are full of shit! The official pentagon story is total bullshit.....there were at least 6 cameras on the attack side of the pentagon on 9/11. ...not only were there 6 cameras on the outside of the pentagon, there are cameras on the inside of the pentagon. Where the fuck are the tapes? ....there's even videos showing evidence being planted at the pentagon. 9/11 = Inside Job!
@LordValorium With that logic, well, it just doesn't add up. Let me put it like this, look for the early footage of the pentagon attack. You will find a very small hole punched through the walls, that is to say, large enough to just barely fit the cockpit and passenger compartments. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE WINGS? You expect me to believe that a big metal bird flying at 500 mph is gonna hit a concrete type surface and the wings will just disintegrate without even as much as putting a dent on the wall?
Alright, pay attention. This WAS an airplane that hit the building-- however, it hit indirectly. The plane hit the ground nearby the Pentagon and it was destroyed on impact, sending much of the debris into the building. One of the engines was found in the parking lot over a mile away. So yeah, most of the shrapnel that was in the building was destroyed beyond most recognition and in very small bits. Read the damn commission report, stop trusting conspiracy theorists.
There is no evidence of a plane hitting the ground nearby, there are no engines, no wings, no tail section, no landing gear, no huge jet fuel fire, no luggage, no paper, and not enough of any plane to even fill my pickup druck. 9/11 was an inside job.
You're a fucking liar! There is no evidence of anything hitting the ground nearby, you lying sack of shit. The official pentagon story is total bullshit.....there were at least 6 cameras on the attack side of the pentagon on 9/11. ...not only were there 6 cameras on the outside of the pentagon, there are cameras on the inside of the pentagon. Where the fuck are the tapes? ....there's even videos showing evidence being planted at the pentagon. 9/11 = Inside Job!
LOL videos showing evidence being planted at the Pentagon. Show me it. Show me any of this "evidence" you have. But wait. You don't have it. Fucking truther.
@geegooman2323 could you explain how 12 tons of titanium alloy can be destroyed by impact? You need at least a temperature of 4000 degrees to do that. The impact alone cannot generate that much heat. Please help me out here.
Minutes after the alleged attack, standing in front of the Pentagon on 9/11, Jamie McIntyre, CNN Pentagon correspondent since 1992: “From my close up inspection there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. . . . . The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand.
There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage — nothing around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon.”
Why were about 70 people cleaning the Pentagon lawn of debris even while the fires had not been extinguished? Removing evidence this soon would be a crime, wouldn't it?
What is interesting is the FBI confiscated all the videos surrounding the Petnagon and gave back copies, so the only witnesses to the crash are people. People can be scared and manipulated into lying. Videos don't lie as easily.
@thnksmarter "What is interesting is the FBI confiscated all the videos surrounding the Petnagon and gave back copies" They didn't give back copies, that would defeat the entire purpose of taking the videos.
@thnksmarter Um, duh, the government is trying to hide the fact that flight 77didn't hit the pentagon, it was probably a cruise missile by the damage caused to the pentagon.
@jackson32 I have only ever seen 3 video's of the pentagon. One from the hotel, only the shadow of something is visible on the ground. And the other 2 from the left of the crash point, none of the three are clear at all. That's what get's me, around a place like the pentagon i would expect more camera's. It's like somebody picked the most unclear footage out of what was available.
@whereisthejustice1 The have been a few pictures that were good enough to show there was no wreckage of a 767 airliner. Although the hole is not very clear, what has to be realized is that if a 767 did fly into the pentagon we would see evidence of it in the facade. Look at what was done to WTC 1, you could see the outline of the plane. Yes the pentagon was built stronger than that, reenforced we are told, but still we would see the basic imprint of the plane.
@jackson32 I agree, or at least the engines would have caused more damage than the central hole. But Their is a guy on here (ry2sense) who criticized the loose change version of events, claiming that the photographs they selected did not show the whole picture. The whole thing is confusing, but what i will not believe is that their is only three camera's around or in the pentagon. Lack of video evidence is a bit suspicious in itself, and the ambiguity of the video's released is very telling.
@whereisthejustice1 Lets face it, there's no clear sign of any penetration other than that hole which IS consistent with a missile. Your also right about the withholding of video evidence, that's a clear sign they're hiding the fact that it wasn't an airliner. Also the almost perfectly round hole on the inside wall of ring c means that we are supposed to believe the soft nose caused this damage after going through hundreds of feet of building. It looks like a bunker buster cruise missile to me.
@whereisthejustice1 Take it from me this ry2sense is not a very smart person. Most of the evidence says it wasn't a 767 and much of this is physical evidence that is the most credible.
1. no large pieces of plane either inside or outside according to many eyewitness's including the fire chief in charge on 911
2. only a single hole in the facade
3. the almost perfectly round hole inside ring c
4. the near impossibility of crashing the plane so low
Yeah, I'd have to agree with the rest of them. SOMETHING hit the Pentagon, and no body knows what it was. Maybe it was a magical UFO sent from Mars trying to end the world. Or maybe it was all the idiots who believe it wasn't a plane, on a space rocket that flew into the Pentagon, who knows? But I would like to know: A) What happend to the plane that never showed up B) What happend to all of the people that were on that plane, and never made it home? I guess they just magically disappeared
"I could see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit windshield or other window from the plane. " (Jamie Mcintyre)
To blondebaby32681, your friend was on the other side of the Pentagon, but you're going to believe her that it was a plane. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. Would a blonde joke just not be appropriate here?
WTC Was an divertion from an failed Terroristattack by israel to explode a stolen Russian Warhead above Washington , they want to throw Us into an Atomic war !
For that they sunk a South Korean Warvessel with German Torpedo´s with their German subs they just had gotten in 2009 from jew guttenberg in Germany...for that they are setting Fires in Russia at the Moment...for that they are hateseeding against USA with endless haarp and chemtrailstories...for that they are harassing China and Iran
Sorry Jamie, we have to accept your first answer! Its no good changing your story years later because of threats etc, you were there on site, and like all of us, you saw no plane parts! Thank you and goodnight! 9/11 was an inside job!
I saw daily coverage of 911 because I was living in DC at the time...and not once, did I hear any reporters in the following days of 911, say one damm thing about workers recovering any engines or anything relative to plane crahs debris. Even watching the clips of the "crash" you dont see any plane debris..and I didnt see any burn skids on the grass next to where the plane allegedley went in. Nor is the hole big enuf to accomodate the size of a 737. This story is full of "holes" and bullshit.
@MisterCrazyLegs Really? Look up WUSA9 (CBS affiliate) and their coverage of the Pentagon, and you'll see during their coverage PLANE DEBRIS ON THE FRONT LAWN, the same debris that appears in still photos.
The reason conspiracies come about is because idiotic people use their tiny brains, in which they haven't used in years, and come up with their own theory rather than believing what actually happened. When others try to prove that "the government was behind 9/11" other people begin to wonder too. It's ridiculous. People need to just believe the truth. What would they have gained? What have they gained? Spending money on soldiers to send them over seas? I doubt they wanted this to happen...
@18Revo I agree, this ridiculous theory that a passenger jet hit the pentagon and that a handful of arabs with knives brought the supposedly greaest country in the world to its knees is such bullshit, well said dude!
@18Revo No, people begin to look at the FACTS instead of the lies they were fed by the puppet media. And it's not the "Govt" ... it's those that control the govt ... those you obviously have no clue about. Seriously, who do you think pulls the strings? You or your vote? Do you have any idea how many people made HUGE profits off just the wars and crack down on privacy that followed? Who beniftted? Wake up man. Your so-called "govt" has been trying to warn you for many decades what is going on
Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building," Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief Sean Boger said. "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."
the EYEWITNESSES say they saw a JET LINER,let me guess they were actually aliens disguised as civilians working for the c.i.a?yall are retarded not one of yall are experts in avionics,demolition,etc.. what makes u think u know more than the actual scientists that have PROVEN it was a jet liner,or maybe they weren't scientist's but nsa operatives pretending to be haha
it was a conspiracy, they tell us it was a conspiracy from 19 random arabs that were mad at us, instead of the 10,000 super rich americans who sit in the positions of power in every corporation and bank in the world. they needed an excuse to finally take away our rights and liberties in the name of security, and start world war three as they call anyone who goes against the government a 'nutjob', 'conspiracy theorist', 'wacko'...thats why they pay MILLIONS of dollars a year trying to "debunk".
I too have a difficult time with some of these conspiracies. But anyone with half a brain could not simply dismiss this without at least a willingness to delve further into the story. Nutjobs and wackos are all around, but darn if I can ignore the valid questions that this video raises. I mean...JUST HOW THE HELL DO YOU EXPLAIN a 45FT piece of anything fitting into a 14-16ft hole? and 100ft wide?? comeon, even I'm not that stupid. I'd really like to know how it was done.
@vidmakr Easy: 757s aren't 45 feet tall. The Body Exterior Width of a 757: 12 ft 4 in. The Body Exterior Height of a 757 is 13.6 (information from Boeing's site). The TAIL HEIGHT is 45 feet, but the tails are thin aluminum (planes are generally lightweight hollow aluminum to be able to carry as much weight as possible). You can't expect lightweight aluminum to punch through reinforced concrete and steel beams bolted to the floor and ceiling. It's asking too much of the measly tail.
..because there was no plane that crashed into it! :L:L You americans are FUCKING RETARDED!! AMERICAN GOVERNMENT DOES THIS SHIT ALL THE TIME, SET OF A DISCO SMOKE MACHINE AND PRETNED SOMETHING CRASHED INTO IT! :L:L:L USELESS AMERICANS
this actually happened well the twin towers got hit by a plane i even saw the shape of the body and wing and engine in the world trade center on a video on tv and also what if the plane that crashed into the pentagon was on an angle you never know and how can you prove that the government did it but we can prove the plane hitting it by watching 9/11 videos and the car bombing in 93 in the hotel right next to the wtc the car was in the basement of that hotel (i saw all this on some videos)
just another thing i want to point out; y is it that there are around 80 cameras positioned at that spot where the plane crashed and the gov. hasn't released any footage other than a still frame camera of the plane impact. If they have nothing to hide, then y r they hiding the other videos, and dont say its because the videos contain footage that the public isnt allowed to see because all i want to see is the view that anyone can see if they were standing right at that road.
Hmm yes. You raise an interesting arguement there, but in some ways.. apparently there was no evidence of any terrorist or muslims or any Al-Quieda on the planes..which is also for concern. Some people have actually said, "the planes were fake remoted planes controlled by the government and the REAL ones were sent to a hidden military base [except Flight 93 which government executed and crashed]" So some say. It's hard, but it will be sussed. Truth will be told, not today.. but one day soon....
I heard that the justice department was called and a women said something to them "mother fker" what she called you found her blew her entire head and face off the wacko albert valenca workingin the pentagon more than one head off in florida like always on from new york they hit the pentagon back and the pentagon hit new york dog fights with something blowing a wackos head off not mother fkers he said michelle cornish is one but you are one beverly is one
well considering that all business videos in the area are all over youtube i would find that hard to believe, plus there's a plethora of other evidence that with out a doubt proves a plane hit. You don't need video evidence of a murder to convict someone do you, NO. Do some research, only fools don't believe a plane was flown into the pentagon, one thing to think the gov. flew it, but a plane definitely hit.
dude, ur a dumbass. where are the plane parts, how were there almost no casualties, where is the debris from a plane, where are the bodies that should have been on the plane, y is the impact so small, and not the size of a plane, why is it that an engine was found that is only 1/3 the size of what it should have been if it were a plane. Think about it, no evidence supports that it was a plane that hit the pentagon.
wow, the plane parts were in the building, the size of the hole was actually bigger than the body of the plane, the engine "part" you've seen was not to small as explained by aerospace, There are pictures of charred bodies in their seats at 911research, there are also pictures of the landing gear, the cockpit debris at the punch out hole, various engine parts all identified by aerospace as the right size. The black boxes were found and all remains were DNA identified to the people on the plane
t j the eggman there could have been not alot of people on the plane and some of the plane such as the wing could have torn off on impact or when the plane hit the lightposts
no plane hit any lightposts. i cant remember the name of the video, but if ur interested there is one that has a couple guys interviewing people who saw the plane and said it went more towards arlington and not in the direction of the lightposts. besides if the plane did go from that angle and if it was that plane, how could it have hit so low on the pentagon and the engines not have scraped up the grass infront of the pentagon. U may be right, but so far im not convinced.
@TJtheEggman 1. The plane didn't just go low-it actually hit the grass and bounced upwards in its last few fractions of seconds before slamming into the building, collapsing some 100 feet of concrete on the first floor and 10-20 feet on the second where the body struck.
2. It didn't scrape up grass because it's aluminum. It wasn't sandpaper. It slid in a way, but there's no physical reason for it to have scraped up the grass. It's a smooth metal plating.
@TJtheEggman The pictures of wreckage with the word "American" [Airlines] on it are very clear. We've also found the rims from 757 landing gear and a Rolls Royce (used on 757s) engine. The impact is maybe 16 feet, which matches up with a 12 by 13 foot body of a 757 plane. The side it hit was made of reinforced concrete and steel beams that were being repaired when it hit. Bodies have been recovered and genetic testing has confirmed that they were scheduled to be on the place.
where do you get your information. i think you are pure bullshit. your posts are not consistent with reports coming from the mainstream media or internet networks. and dude your no harm to grass due to aluminum plating explanation is more than a stretch. can you reference sources the public can access?
yes eyewitnesses reported seeing charred remains still strapped into their seats, You're right large aircraft parts were found, and there are many pictures, the landing gear, engine compression stage, hub, various engine parts that would not have melted, on the lawn, multiple hull pieces. Not to mention almost all victims on the plane were identified by DNA. And there were 100+ eyewitnesses who saw a plane hit the pentagon
If this was a court case, no doubt that a plane hit.
McIntyre is a Bush supporter. No doubt about it. He recently posted a anti-Shinseki column on CNN. Or maybe he just hates Asian Americans. I don't know.
The "plane" was supposedly circled around in a maneuver described by pilots to be very very difficult, executed by a man who was described by his flight teachers as barely able to maintain control of an aircraft, flown into the only section of the Pentagon specifically reinforced for aircraft impact, which was also not fully staffed that day. Then the footage of the crash is all confiscated and the frames that are released show no clear pictures of a 757. Something isn't right.
A b-52 and a 757 muuuch different. The 18 foot hole just doesn't fit an entire fuselage, wings, engines, and tail. The seven thousand pound engines should have left some sort of mark. It happened to make it's way through that small of a hole and punched through 3(i believe) reinforced rings of the pentagon.
You know what i dont understand, when you look at pictures and footage of after the pentagon attack, YOU DONT SEE REMAINS OF ANY PLANE! tell me what you think.
Oh, not only that but then they went on with Mike Walter diversion. Someone allegedly took Mike Walter's cruise missile comparison out of context to promote conspiracy theory.
And even though it has nothing to do with Jamie McIntyre's report, Walter invites McIntyre to conclude that both of their stories were taken out of context.
Too much whitewashing for a mere conspiracy theory.
"yep - we bombed ourselves so we could invade a douchbag country and sacrifice ourselves, friends and loved ones just to make the price of oil go up forselves - you're a genius - think of this all on your own?"
no, your gov bombed us (none of their loved ones died), used our soldiers to make HUGE profits off two wars and make even MORE money off us from oil. They're the geniuses, we're the suckers.
This is not even debatable anymore. Bodies don't just vanish into thin air. Even if they burnt there would be remains. This whole thing makes me sick.
A friend of mine was IN the Pentagon when it was hit. If she says there was a plane...I'm gonna tend to believe her. Thankfully she was on the other side of the building and wasn't hurt.
Does this friend know a lot about aviation? Could it be that something did hit the pentagon, but it wasn't the same plane??
It's easy to dismiss such questions in a time of hurt when the answers point to an even more sinister reality then what originally seems to have happened.
Don't tend to believe her...don't believe anyone...just research and let the info lead you. Maybe look how all the buildings fell straight down...even building 7.
@blondebaby32681 I understand why you would believe your friend over anyone else...but how would she know that it was a plane if she was on the other side of one of the largest buildings on the face of the Earth??
@MisterCrazyLegs You can hear planes of that size even when they're thousands of feet up, and you think despite being just a few hundred feet away would NOT hear a low-flying 757?
Your "friend at the Pentagon was "briefed" it was a plane and "told" by her superiors that is the "official story". ALL Military personal NEVER question THEY MUST FOLLOW ORDERS and their chain of commend - that is how the game is played.
For those who have not yet bet lobotomized, they can see there was NO PLANE. People who get sick of this BS ,whistle-blow, resign, get killed in action or are dishonorably discharged.
@blondebaby32681 So your friend never saw a plane actually hit the building as she was on the other side but because she was told it was a plane then told you it was a plane ... it must have been a plane? The media and the real perpa-traitors duped us all that day. Instead of just believing what you are told why not look at the actual evidence and make your own conclusions from that?
@blondebaby32681 "A friend of mine was IN the Pentagon when it was hit. If she says there was a plane...I'm gonna tend to believe her." Fire Chief Ed Plaugher, who was in charge at the Pentagon on 911 said: "there are some small pieces of aircraft visible from the interior during this fire-fighting operation I'm talking about, but not large sections. In other words, there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing." It's not believable that there would be no large pieces.
this dude changed his story 18 months later, now in interviews and on tv he says he saw the wreckage, photographed it, in one interview on you tube he says he picked up pieces, like fuck he did, it wasa secure scene the media were'nt allowed within 100 yards. i heard some rumours etc re: huge numbers of people not turning up to work at pentagon and towers that day? anything to back that up on here?
Sorry I know someone who died that day, and also someone who survied. He saw a plane! He was saying it well before anyone put it in his mind, or before he had her about the trade center.
The whole point of 911 was a reason to go to war for US selfish ambitions AND to sign the Patriot ActII that was sighned without congress oversight. It gives the govt more control over citizens and takes away all rights for the people. So if they wish they can tap your phones, enter your house, put you in jail and deem you guilty till proven innocent. Justice and law courts are on their way out and the doors are wide open for the president to issue MARTIAL LAW.
yep - we bombed ourselves so we could invade a douchbag country and sacrifice ourselves, friends and loved ones just to make the price of oil go up forselves - you're a genius - think of this all on your own?
It was hit by a missile and so were the towers!! The planes we saw on tv were delayed forcast and they were CGI drawn images with many mistakes. This ia a proven fact and the media under CFR have made this into a massive hoax. The Trade towers were detonated in multi layers including tower 7 with c4 or eequivelant that burns at 3000 degrees. Jet fuel only burns at 1900. Steel melts at 2500 degrees. Thats why molten steel was found at the base.The evidence was quickly buried.
one thing missing - motive? besides, the steel would have cooled and hardened by the time it would have been found, unless it was incinerated at 10000 degrees or something.
Motive isn't missing either because the Neo-conservative Project for a New American Century was pretty much followed to the letter. They got to flex their muscles overseas and marginalize the rights of the people at home, giving them more control both domestically and abroad, just as they predicted they would.
It's odd that the security camera that caught the crash was in a second by second frame. The government is smart enough to realize that a security camera focused on the Pentagon needs to be more concise so a whole event can be recorded instead of little bits of it. And the camera left out the most important part of the attack-the plane making contact with the pentagon. The attacks were a conspiracy.
What's even funnier is that one of the most secure buildings in the country had only one video of one of the most important events in American history. A video that was only like 5 frames long. When you can clearly see half a dozen cameras just along the building itself. That and the video footage from a convenience store across the street that was confiscated by the government(I forget which specific agency) and never released. A plane over 100 feet wide doesn't fit in a 60 foot hole.
people say they saw a plane because they're told a plane crashed there. They've psychologically written out the possibility of it being something else, though I don't know that many people come forward with any evidence of a plane being there that day. even the police will tell you that eyewitness accounts are unreliable. look at other pictures of the crash site and you won't see any plane parts and a hole too small to fit a 757 in it.
the hole being too small - that happened with the Empire state building too, in 1945 when it was hit with a b-25. i'm not sure why that happens, but the empire definitely was hit by a plane.
dude, planes are aluminum cans, not very thick, this one was filled with fuel. The Pentagon is made of reinforced concrete, its DESIGNED to withstand attacks from high power weapons. The plane was going so fast that it disinigrated on impact, and the heat of the explosion was immense, melting away the plane in milliseconds. There was no large pieces of debris to smash through the building. The Pentagons structure withstood the heat and shockwave.
How about the titanium engines you fool? How about the SAM that are around the Pentagon? How about all the air bases right in the DC area that had PLENTY of time to scramble jets? Get a clue. Government IS composed of people. People have flaws.
the engines of the plane were 11 foot long 9 foot high and made of titanium alloy, your talking complete crap, when in the history of air crashes has a plane ever spontaniously melted in milliseconds. Jet fuel is specilised kerosine not that mush different from your stove, listen to the lies comming out your mouth and have the balls to question your reality for just a minute. They claim that the hole was 75 foot wide???!!! the film and pictures completely refute that. Wake up
Yeah, the Pentagon is also supposed to be one of the most security-laden places on the planet. You mean to tell me with the plethora of mind-boggling security measures in place, there's no credible footage of what really hit the pentagon? Give me a break.
At 9:36 a.m., The Fish is Clippered up in real time to Hunter and US Navy Secretary Gordon England. BJ's bitch 'Dyke' is trying to track down the Pentagon Wedge 1 project manager for KPMG client AMEC. Fish is duty officer for the US Naval Command Center where AMEC is sabotage testing for a Global Guardian war game coordinated by Norman Mineta and the Desmarais family.
(cont) Chic Burlingame or Hani Hanjour is the pilot of AA77. Fish yells "Dyke's perched on a cable reel outside my window. Looks like a Category IIIa [landing.] Looks like Raytheon's Skywarrior. Dyke's barking Abel Danger warning 'Bugger, Bugger, BEAGLES!' Semper Fi. God help us all." Line goes dead.
MMMM I heardly clearly in this clip that the plane hit dirctly into the pentagon itself. In the entire interview he says repeatedly that a plane flew into the pentagon.
The beginning of this clip he is just making it clear that it didn't hit the ground first.
What is the point of posting this clip! There is no mystery here. Do you have proof it was never again played again on T.V.?
I can't understand where you people are coming from, and I have an I.Q. of 165. There is a relatively small but rabid group who haven't forgotten that they were driven out of Europe after they invaded it hundreds of years ago, or that they were violently opposed when they invaded the Holy Land. They are a vocal group that has expressed not just a desire but a crusade to convert or destroy all who don't believe as they do.
this bullshit if that was the acutally plane it wud blow half of the pentigon even if it didnt go in to it could still destroy it. it was a only little plane why hasnt this bin seen on the newes so much because it to obvoisly its lie
Hey u know what I really think unless you were there you really shouldn't speculate - there are people effected by these ridiculous rumours and heresay... move on so that those grieving can move on!!
it 9is possible for the remains to disapear, they could be wedged in to the groun, and stuff like that. You also have to remember the US government wont be pleased having inspecters in the pentagon, finding there secrets. so expect there to be little information on the reckage.
Ok so you are basically calling all those driving past the pentagon on that day, those visiting the pentagon that day and those who live in and around arlington and who witnessed a plane travelling toward the pentagon all liars?? I think you have way too much time on your hands - that's my theory!!! Why don't you go and spend time with the families of the people who perished that day and see how they feel knowing someone is out there tormenting their one truth!!
Actually if you read into it...most cases believe it was in fact a smaller airplane that hit the pentagon...not that there was NO plane at all. Just because they were given a reason for what happened doesn't make it true.
does the facade of this building look as though a plane hit it? Can you honestly say, using common sense, watching videos of other plane crashes, seeing the planes enter WTC, that a plane hit the pentagon? NO WAY! There is clearly something else involved here.
look up Flight 232 1989 siux city, the crash pics show a hole that is about the size of the pentagon, and you see LITTLE plane parts, thats bc metal hitting a solid object at a great speed dis-intigrates metal<<<
the guys from Loose Change are disagents. Their job was to create a strawman film to coverup the truth. thats why they get promoted so heavily on the jew media and thats why they've been handing out FREE copies of 100000s and neglect for 18months to fix up the shit in their film.
I heard Jamie McIntyre on CNN like a year and a half ago now with his story changed saying that people that thought a plane didn't hit the Pentagon were wrong because he did see the tail and wings and seats and stuff at the Pentagon. I don't wanna say that Jamie McIntyre is in on the deal but why did he change his story? I just don't get that.
Fuck that its all propaganda....Stupid people why do civillians have to fight a war on terrorist no one wants to fight in a war.. osama and george should sort it out in the ring lol
The CNN reporter (Jamie McIntyre) said he was INSIDE the building at the time of the 757's impact; therefore he did not see the 757 crash into the pentagon, although there were dozens of people who ACTUALLY SAW the 757 flying over and crash into the Pentagon. He states "From my close up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane crashing anywhere near the pentagon" But You can clearly see large pieces of debris in the background. His inspection must not have been very close to have missed them.
Well thank you for your insights, however I don't know if his judgement was as brazen as you suggest. With only about a 20 foot hole in the first layer of the pentagon, one might reasonably expect the wings to be located outside of the building, somewhere on the lawn. What about the engines on each wing? They couldn't simply disentigrate, there's no immediate wreckage of them to be found and there are windows no more than a few feet away of said hole still intact. Something just doesn't add up.
PENTAGON 757 EVIDENCE.. Parts with pictures found at the pentagon from a 757...Rim and Tire, Large & Small pieces of the aluminum skin with A/A markings, Parts of (2) Rolls-Royce Engines, a 757 Landing gear, Seats & Luggage, Deceased Passengers identified by Dental & DNA testing along with personal belongings such as Jewelry, pocket knives, etc. Dozens of eyewitness's that specifically state seeing the A/A 757 fly over and/or crash into the Pentagon.
MARKSMAN500 - Rim that cannot be detached from it's landing gear by 'other-than' mechanical means and remain intact? Engine that has been "obivously" dismantled with its screws and sub-assemblies removed? Plane incenerating AND DNA? WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL?
I remember watching this clip and later hearing bush say it was a 757. I knew instanty America was no longer free and democratic. I also remember later seeing that pussy Jamie McIntyre retract his words on some tv show.
ducatidave5 4 months ago
Lying twooftard bastard! Why are you posting an edited down version of the original report? Why did you cut out the parts where he talks about plane parts?? Did you not want us to hear that part?? Well, here is the original report with out the editing. Listen to the Jamie Mcintyre talk about plane parts at about :30
watch?v=e1iQu1JuKJI
All twooftards are liars!
xxBIGKING2xx 6 months ago
@xxBIGKING2xx Why are you so angry? If you are so worked up over people that are seeking answers with a different opinion than you, are you sure you are helping? Even yourself? I suggest you take a little time off, read a book, go fishing on your own on a nice day and enjoy the silence. Read Desiderata. I don't know what a twooftards is, but your anger stops me from caring. You see the video you posted is apx 15 mins later when Jamie was told the official version. So uh, what's that about liars?
answerswithquestions 6 months ago
@answerswithquestions So that's your response? Standard twooftard reply straight from the Handbook. "Anyone that can prove you wrong was in on it' (page 2 I'm told). Just how lame are you morons going to get? If all you can do is make shit up to cover the holes in your fairy tales, you need to get a new conspiracy theory to push. I heard the UFO people are looking for help.
Why am I angry? I hate liars! (especially bad ones)
Twooftard = retarded 'truther'.
xxBIGKING2xx 6 months ago
@answerswithquestions ""You see the video you posted is apx 15 mins later when Jamie was told the official version."" - Pure fantasy. Just like the rest of your so called 'truth' movement. When you idiots come up with something that you can present in a courtroom, you let me know. Until then, you're just blowing smoke and you know it.
xxBIGKING2xx 6 months ago
@xxBIGKING2xx ,, big plane yet small hole ???? where did the engines go??? did they neatly fold up and follow the planes bpdy through the 1 hole in the building,, ,, something isnt right here,, put down your pizza and open your eyes
twostix67 5 months ago
Smh. You truthers are ignorant. You take no account of the 110+ people who witnessed the Pentagon attack with their own eyes. Every one of them said it was a plane, not a missile, a plane. Plus there are pictures of debris found all over the crash site. Do research before you say such lies.
austinmoore97 8 months ago
Easy enough to believe it was a plane when eyewitnesses of those that saw it hit, say it was a plane. Most plane crashes we are used to occur when the pilot is attempting to safely decelerate and save the craft and save lives. Planes are thin aluminum skin, for fuel economy. A thin metal tube at hundreds of miles per hour driven into concrete will disintegrate. Leaving, like in PA, a very unfamiliar accident scene that we're not used to seeing. Very little debris.
LordValorium 10 months ago
Show me evidence of that happening! Show me one video where a 767 disappears after the crash. Actually, you are full of shit! The official pentagon story is total bullshit.....there were at least 6 cameras on the attack side of the pentagon on 9/11. ...not only were there 6 cameras on the outside of the pentagon, there are cameras on the inside of the pentagon. Where the fuck are the tapes? ....there's even videos showing evidence being planted at the pentagon. 9/11 = Inside Job!
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@LordValorium With that logic, well, it just doesn't add up. Let me put it like this, look for the early footage of the pentagon attack. You will find a very small hole punched through the walls, that is to say, large enough to just barely fit the cockpit and passenger compartments. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE WINGS? You expect me to believe that a big metal bird flying at 500 mph is gonna hit a concrete type surface and the wings will just disintegrate without even as much as putting a dent on the wall?
answerswithquestions 6 months ago
Alright, pay attention. This WAS an airplane that hit the building-- however, it hit indirectly. The plane hit the ground nearby the Pentagon and it was destroyed on impact, sending much of the debris into the building. One of the engines was found in the parking lot over a mile away. So yeah, most of the shrapnel that was in the building was destroyed beyond most recognition and in very small bits. Read the damn commission report, stop trusting conspiracy theorists.
geegooman2323 10 months ago
There is no evidence of a plane hitting the ground nearby, there are no engines, no wings, no tail section, no landing gear, no huge jet fuel fire, no luggage, no paper, and not enough of any plane to even fill my pickup druck. 9/11 was an inside job.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
You're a fucking liar! There is no evidence of anything hitting the ground nearby, you lying sack of shit. The official pentagon story is total bullshit.....there were at least 6 cameras on the attack side of the pentagon on 9/11. ...not only were there 6 cameras on the outside of the pentagon, there are cameras on the inside of the pentagon. Where the fuck are the tapes? ....there's even videos showing evidence being planted at the pentagon. 9/11 = Inside Job!
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
LOL videos showing evidence being planted at the Pentagon. Show me it. Show me any of this "evidence" you have. But wait. You don't have it. Fucking truther.
austinmoore97 8 months ago
@austinmoore97 ....we just did show you, Fucking lie-ther
ducatidave5 3 months ago
@geegooman2323 could you explain how 12 tons of titanium alloy can be destroyed by impact? You need at least a temperature of 4000 degrees to do that. The impact alone cannot generate that much heat. Please help me out here.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
Minutes after the alleged attack, standing in front of the Pentagon on 9/11, Jamie McIntyre, CNN Pentagon correspondent since 1992: “From my close up inspection there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. . . . . The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand.
There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage — nothing around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon.”
LeseMajeste 1 year ago
Exactly!
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
Why were about 70 people cleaning the Pentagon lawn of debris even while the fires had not been extinguished? Removing evidence this soon would be a crime, wouldn't it?
ReDIscover911 com
whole2th 1 year ago
@whole2th Exactly and what was Donald Rumsfeld doing out there helping them while america was being attacked?
jackson32 1 year ago
What is interesting is the FBI confiscated all the videos surrounding the Petnagon and gave back copies, so the only witnesses to the crash are people. People can be scared and manipulated into lying. Videos don't lie as easily.
thnksmarter 1 year ago
@thnksmarter "What is interesting is the FBI confiscated all the videos surrounding the Petnagon and gave back copies" They didn't give back copies, that would defeat the entire purpose of taking the videos.
jackson32 1 year ago
@jackson32 Um, what else would they be?
thnksmarter 1 year ago
@thnksmarter Um, duh, the government is trying to hide the fact that flight 77didn't hit the pentagon, it was probably a cruise missile by the damage caused to the pentagon.
jackson32 1 year ago
@jackson32 I have only ever seen 3 video's of the pentagon. One from the hotel, only the shadow of something is visible on the ground. And the other 2 from the left of the crash point, none of the three are clear at all. That's what get's me, around a place like the pentagon i would expect more camera's. It's like somebody picked the most unclear footage out of what was available.
whereisthejustice1 1 year ago
@whereisthejustice1 The have been a few pictures that were good enough to show there was no wreckage of a 767 airliner. Although the hole is not very clear, what has to be realized is that if a 767 did fly into the pentagon we would see evidence of it in the facade. Look at what was done to WTC 1, you could see the outline of the plane. Yes the pentagon was built stronger than that, reenforced we are told, but still we would see the basic imprint of the plane.
jackson32 1 year ago
Comment removed
whereisthejustice1 1 year ago
@jackson32 I agree, or at least the engines would have caused more damage than the central hole. But Their is a guy on here (ry2sense) who criticized the loose change version of events, claiming that the photographs they selected did not show the whole picture. The whole thing is confusing, but what i will not believe is that their is only three camera's around or in the pentagon. Lack of video evidence is a bit suspicious in itself, and the ambiguity of the video's released is very telling.
whereisthejustice1 1 year ago
@whereisthejustice1 Lets face it, there's no clear sign of any penetration other than that hole which IS consistent with a missile. Your also right about the withholding of video evidence, that's a clear sign they're hiding the fact that it wasn't an airliner. Also the almost perfectly round hole on the inside wall of ring c means that we are supposed to believe the soft nose caused this damage after going through hundreds of feet of building. It looks like a bunker buster cruise missile to me.
jackson32 1 year ago
@whereisthejustice1 Take it from me this ry2sense is not a very smart person. Most of the evidence says it wasn't a 767 and much of this is physical evidence that is the most credible.
1. no large pieces of plane either inside or outside according to many eyewitness's including the fire chief in charge on 911
2. only a single hole in the facade
3. the almost perfectly round hole inside ring c
4. the near impossibility of crashing the plane so low
5. the confiscation of all videos
jackson32 1 year ago
Fuck loose change.
Watch "missing links"
CriticalDissection 1 year ago
Yeah, I'd have to agree with the rest of them. SOMETHING hit the Pentagon, and no body knows what it was. Maybe it was a magical UFO sent from Mars trying to end the world. Or maybe it was all the idiots who believe it wasn't a plane, on a space rocket that flew into the Pentagon, who knows? But I would like to know: A) What happend to the plane that never showed up B) What happend to all of the people that were on that plane, and never made it home? I guess they just magically disappeared
18Revo 1 year ago
Nice quote mine
"I could see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit windshield or other window from the plane. " (Jamie Mcintyre)
grandmastershek 1 year ago
To blondebaby32681, your friend was on the other side of the Pentagon, but you're going to believe her that it was a plane. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. She was on the other side of the building. Would a blonde joke just not be appropriate here?
restoresoundmoney 1 year ago
WTC Was an divertion from an failed Terroristattack by israel to explode a stolen Russian Warhead above Washington , they want to throw Us into an Atomic war !
For that they sunk a South Korean Warvessel with German Torpedo´s with their German subs they just had gotten in 2009 from jew guttenberg in Germany...for that they are setting Fires in Russia at the Moment...for that they are hateseeding against USA with endless haarp and chemtrailstories...for that they are harassing China and Iran
awawaw777 1 year ago 2
Sorry Jamie, we have to accept your first answer! Its no good changing your story years later because of threats etc, you were there on site, and like all of us, you saw no plane parts! Thank you and goodnight! 9/11 was an inside job!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 year ago 2
@wellifthemediasaysit One of the best usernames I have ever seen!
ItsBB1tch 1 year ago
I saw daily coverage of 911 because I was living in DC at the time...and not once, did I hear any reporters in the following days of 911, say one damm thing about workers recovering any engines or anything relative to plane crahs debris. Even watching the clips of the "crash" you dont see any plane debris..and I didnt see any burn skids on the grass next to where the plane allegedley went in. Nor is the hole big enuf to accomodate the size of a 737. This story is full of "holes" and bullshit.
MisterCrazyLegs 1 year ago 2
@MisterCrazyLegs Really? Look up WUSA9 (CBS affiliate) and their coverage of the Pentagon, and you'll see during their coverage PLANE DEBRIS ON THE FRONT LAWN, the same debris that appears in still photos.
TyVulpine 1 year ago
The reason conspiracies come about is because idiotic people use their tiny brains, in which they haven't used in years, and come up with their own theory rather than believing what actually happened. When others try to prove that "the government was behind 9/11" other people begin to wonder too. It's ridiculous. People need to just believe the truth. What would they have gained? What have they gained? Spending money on soldiers to send them over seas? I doubt they wanted this to happen...
18Revo 1 year ago
@18Revo I agree, this ridiculous theory that a passenger jet hit the pentagon and that a handful of arabs with knives brought the supposedly greaest country in the world to its knees is such bullshit, well said dude!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 year ago 2
@18Revo No, people begin to look at the FACTS instead of the lies they were fed by the puppet media. And it's not the "Govt" ... it's those that control the govt ... those you obviously have no clue about. Seriously, who do you think pulls the strings? You or your vote? Do you have any idea how many people made HUGE profits off just the wars and crack down on privacy that followed? Who beniftted? Wake up man. Your so-called "govt" has been trying to warn you for many decades what is going on
luvmyctd 1 year ago
Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building," Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief Sean Boger said. "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."
nocturnezero 1 year ago
You KIDS need to quit playing on dad's computer.
Stick with your coloring books !
eddie56120032003 1 year ago
the EYEWITNESSES say they saw a JET LINER,let me guess they were actually aliens disguised as civilians working for the c.i.a?yall are retarded not one of yall are experts in avionics,demolition,etc.. what makes u think u know more than the actual scientists that have PROVEN it was a jet liner,or maybe they weren't scientist's but nsa operatives pretending to be haha
lonewolf432 1 year ago
@lonewolf432 Please let us know which scientists have proven that so we can read up and possible ask them some questions.
simonnaylor 1 year ago
if no plane hit the pentagon what happened to the plane?
MRrealmadridRaul 1 year ago
@MRrealmadridRaul That would be a conspiracy theory to answer that. We need a proper investigation instead of speculation.
simonnaylor 1 year ago
It was a JSSAM missile. It looks like a very small plane so from a distance you'd think it was very far away. See other video
TheGreatCorneliuski 1 year ago
it was a conspiracy, they tell us it was a conspiracy from 19 random arabs that were mad at us, instead of the 10,000 super rich americans who sit in the positions of power in every corporation and bank in the world. they needed an excuse to finally take away our rights and liberties in the name of security, and start world war three as they call anyone who goes against the government a 'nutjob', 'conspiracy theorist', 'wacko'...thats why they pay MILLIONS of dollars a year trying to "debunk".
snillocekim 1 year ago
hahahahhahha
pandadust1 2 years ago
and not 1 video or photograph showing a 757 was ever released showing it approach...Obviously they are hiding something. That is clear.
kennyd203 2 years ago
@kennyd203 Name the camera(s) that you think picked this up.
nocturnezero 1 year ago
you people are a bunch of wackos
joeburnsworld 2 years ago
@joeburnsworld and you are a gargoyle.
ethericplane 2 years ago
I too have a difficult time with some of these conspiracies. But anyone with half a brain could not simply dismiss this without at least a willingness to delve further into the story. Nutjobs and wackos are all around, but darn if I can ignore the valid questions that this video raises. I mean...JUST HOW THE HELL DO YOU EXPLAIN a 45FT piece of anything fitting into a 14-16ft hole? and 100ft wide?? comeon, even I'm not that stupid. I'd really like to know how it was done.
vidmakr 2 years ago
@vidmakr Easy: 757s aren't 45 feet tall. The Body Exterior Width of a 757: 12 ft 4 in. The Body Exterior Height of a 757 is 13.6 (information from Boeing's site). The TAIL HEIGHT is 45 feet, but the tails are thin aluminum (planes are generally lightweight hollow aluminum to be able to carry as much weight as possible). You can't expect lightweight aluminum to punch through reinforced concrete and steel beams bolted to the floor and ceiling. It's asking too much of the measly tail.
nocturnezero 1 year ago
lag?!
ZyberTwins 2 years ago
i watched documentry and you can onley see one hole,but there are no dameges made with wings of plain...this is 100% inside job...
2k99999 2 years ago
..because there was no plane that crashed into it! :L:L You americans are FUCKING RETARDED!! AMERICAN GOVERNMENT DOES THIS SHIT ALL THE TIME, SET OF A DISCO SMOKE MACHINE AND PRETNED SOMETHING CRASHED INTO IT! :L:L:L USELESS AMERICANS
rick60055 2 years ago
im american & agree
UntamedWalrus 2 years ago
weih weih weih.
CrazyIemon 2 years ago
this actually happened well the twin towers got hit by a plane i even saw the shape of the body and wing and engine in the world trade center on a video on tv and also what if the plane that crashed into the pentagon was on an angle you never know and how can you prove that the government did it but we can prove the plane hitting it by watching 9/11 videos and the car bombing in 93 in the hotel right next to the wtc the car was in the basement of that hotel (i saw all this on some videos)
colinjd123 2 years ago
just another thing i want to point out; y is it that there are around 80 cameras positioned at that spot where the plane crashed and the gov. hasn't released any footage other than a still frame camera of the plane impact. If they have nothing to hide, then y r they hiding the other videos, and dont say its because the videos contain footage that the public isnt allowed to see because all i want to see is the view that anyone can see if they were standing right at that road.
TJtheEggman 2 years ago 6
@TJtheEggman There aren't around 80 cameras.
nocturnezero 1 year ago
Hmm yes. You raise an interesting arguement there, but in some ways.. apparently there was no evidence of any terrorist or muslims or any Al-Quieda on the planes..which is also for concern. Some people have actually said, "the planes were fake remoted planes controlled by the government and the REAL ones were sent to a hidden military base [except Flight 93 which government executed and crashed]" So some say. It's hard, but it will be sussed. Truth will be told, not today.. but one day soon....
rick60055 2 years ago
PAhahahahaha!! "Evil Arab Terrorists" :L:L:L ROFLMAO Made me laugh when i read it :L just sounds liek something off a cartoon !
rick60055 2 years ago
I heard that the justice department was called and a women said something to them "mother fker" what she called you found her blew her entire head and face off the wacko albert valenca workingin the pentagon more than one head off in florida like always on from new york they hit the pentagon back and the pentagon hit new york dog fights with something blowing a wackos head off not mother fkers he said michelle cornish is one but you are one beverly is one
richmondpalmbay62 2 years ago
well considering that all business videos in the area are all over youtube i would find that hard to believe, plus there's a plethora of other evidence that with out a doubt proves a plane hit. You don't need video evidence of a murder to convict someone do you, NO. Do some research, only fools don't believe a plane was flown into the pentagon, one thing to think the gov. flew it, but a plane definitely hit.
heafers84 2 years ago
dude, ur a dumbass. where are the plane parts, how were there almost no casualties, where is the debris from a plane, where are the bodies that should have been on the plane, y is the impact so small, and not the size of a plane, why is it that an engine was found that is only 1/3 the size of what it should have been if it were a plane. Think about it, no evidence supports that it was a plane that hit the pentagon.
TJtheEggman 2 years ago
wow, the plane parts were in the building, the size of the hole was actually bigger than the body of the plane, the engine "part" you've seen was not to small as explained by aerospace, There are pictures of charred bodies in their seats at 911research, there are also pictures of the landing gear, the cockpit debris at the punch out hole, various engine parts all identified by aerospace as the right size. The black boxes were found and all remains were DNA identified to the people on the plane
heafers84 2 years ago 3
t j the eggman there could have been not alot of people on the plane and some of the plane such as the wing could have torn off on impact or when the plane hit the lightposts
colinjd123 2 years ago
no plane hit any lightposts. i cant remember the name of the video, but if ur interested there is one that has a couple guys interviewing people who saw the plane and said it went more towards arlington and not in the direction of the lightposts. besides if the plane did go from that angle and if it was that plane, how could it have hit so low on the pentagon and the engines not have scraped up the grass infront of the pentagon. U may be right, but so far im not convinced.
TJtheEggman 2 years ago
@TJtheEggman 1. The plane didn't just go low-it actually hit the grass and bounced upwards in its last few fractions of seconds before slamming into the building, collapsing some 100 feet of concrete on the first floor and 10-20 feet on the second where the body struck.
2. It didn't scrape up grass because it's aluminum. It wasn't sandpaper. It slid in a way, but there's no physical reason for it to have scraped up the grass. It's a smooth metal plating.
nocturnezero 1 year ago
@TJtheEggman The pictures of wreckage with the word "American" [Airlines] on it are very clear. We've also found the rims from 757 landing gear and a Rolls Royce (used on 757s) engine. The impact is maybe 16 feet, which matches up with a 12 by 13 foot body of a 757 plane. The side it hit was made of reinforced concrete and steel beams that were being repaired when it hit. Bodies have been recovered and genetic testing has confirmed that they were scheduled to be on the place.
nocturnezero 1 year ago
@nocturnezero
where do you get your information. i think you are pure bullshit. your posts are not consistent with reports coming from the mainstream media or internet networks. and dude your no harm to grass due to aluminum plating explanation is more than a stretch. can you reference sources the public can access?
ivanhole 1 year ago
@ivanhole The Boeing website.
nocturnezero 1 year ago
Since there was no plane at the Pentagon isnt it safe to say they also must be lying about the WTC?
bodyrocks1on1 2 years ago
i believe 100+ eyewitnesses would disagree with you. 0 eyewitnesses would agree
heafers84 2 years ago
Planes are tough. There would have been pieces of it lying around. Seats, and everything. Were there any bodies?
I think this is one conspiracy certainly worth looking into with more depth.
GGXDizzyJam 2 years ago
yes eyewitnesses reported seeing charred remains still strapped into their seats, You're right large aircraft parts were found, and there are many pictures, the landing gear, engine compression stage, hub, various engine parts that would not have melted, on the lawn, multiple hull pieces. Not to mention almost all victims on the plane were identified by DNA. And there were 100+ eyewitnesses who saw a plane hit the pentagon
If this was a court case, no doubt that a plane hit.
heafers84 2 years ago 2
wow.. fucking terrorists.
Kevvrock1208 2 years ago
my main point is that the US could discredit the truthers by releasing a video showing the 747, so why dont they?
QymLym 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
people people people!!! the government is not stupid enough to crash planes into any building, killing people, let alone THEIR OWN BUILDINGS!!!!!!!!!
fearthehawksndcavs24 3 years ago
McIntyre is a Bush supporter. No doubt about it. He recently posted a anti-Shinseki column on CNN. Or maybe he just hates Asian Americans. I don't know.
jasony79 3 years ago
The "plane" was supposedly circled around in a maneuver described by pilots to be very very difficult, executed by a man who was described by his flight teachers as barely able to maintain control of an aircraft, flown into the only section of the Pentagon specifically reinforced for aircraft impact, which was also not fully staffed that day. Then the footage of the crash is all confiscated and the frames that are released show no clear pictures of a 757. Something isn't right.
radioschizo 3 years ago 8
A b-52 and a 757 muuuch different. The 18 foot hole just doesn't fit an entire fuselage, wings, engines, and tail. The seven thousand pound engines should have left some sort of mark. It happened to make it's way through that small of a hole and punched through 3(i believe) reinforced rings of the pentagon.
radioschizo 3 years ago
There's no large wing/tail/fuselage sections because there was no 757.
CriticalNin3R 3 years ago
lol @ :49
ClunkityClunk4Truth 3 years ago
Why does this video omit the anchor's question to Jamie?
ClunkityClunk4Truth 3 years ago
RESPOND TO THIS COMMENT!
You know what i dont understand, when you look at pictures and footage of after the pentagon attack, YOU DONT SEE REMAINS OF ANY PLANE! tell me what you think.
kinghybodo 3 years ago
you'd have to look inside the building, as that is where the plane exploded. the remains were crushed in the collapse
LegoFan970 3 years ago
Oh, not only that but then they went on with Mike Walter diversion. Someone allegedly took Mike Walter's cruise missile comparison out of context to promote conspiracy theory.
And even though it has nothing to do with Jamie McIntyre's report, Walter invites McIntyre to conclude that both of their stories were taken out of context.
Too much whitewashing for a mere conspiracy theory.
Lillymill 3 years ago
"yep - we bombed ourselves so we could invade a douchbag country and sacrifice ourselves, friends and loved ones just to make the price of oil go up forselves - you're a genius - think of this all on your own?"
no, your gov bombed us (none of their loved ones died), used our soldiers to make HUGE profits off two wars and make even MORE money off us from oil. They're the geniuses, we're the suckers.
jeroliver 3 years ago
they did crash planes into their own building, clearly. 135 government employees were killed in the Pentagon.
LegoFan970 3 years ago
YEA BUT WHERES THE PLANE PARTS!!!!
kingofkingsbc 2 years ago
This is not even debatable anymore. Bodies don't just vanish into thin air. Even if they burnt there would be remains. This whole thing makes me sick.
HemiHead66 3 years ago 2
wheres the vid that actually shows that bastard mcintyre?
tubelogin1 3 years ago
A friend of mine was IN the Pentagon when it was hit. If she says there was a plane...I'm gonna tend to believe her. Thankfully she was on the other side of the building and wasn't hurt.
blondebaby32681 3 years ago
Does this friend know a lot about aviation? Could it be that something did hit the pentagon, but it wasn't the same plane??
It's easy to dismiss such questions in a time of hurt when the answers point to an even more sinister reality then what originally seems to have happened.
Don't tend to believe her...don't believe anyone...just research and let the info lead you. Maybe look how all the buildings fell straight down...even building 7.
answerswithquestions 3 years ago 7
@blondebaby32681 I understand why you would believe your friend over anyone else...but how would she know that it was a plane if she was on the other side of one of the largest buildings on the face of the Earth??
MisterCrazyLegs 1 year ago
@MisterCrazyLegs You can hear planes of that size even when they're thousands of feet up, and you think despite being just a few hundred feet away would NOT hear a low-flying 757?
TyVulpine 1 year ago
@blondebaby32681
Your "friend at the Pentagon was "briefed" it was a plane and "told" by her superiors that is the "official story". ALL Military personal NEVER question THEY MUST FOLLOW ORDERS and their chain of commend - that is how the game is played.
For those who have not yet bet lobotomized, they can see there was NO PLANE. People who get sick of this BS ,whistle-blow, resign, get killed in action or are dishonorably discharged.
LaydeeLiberty1234 1 year ago
@blondebaby32681 So your friend never saw a plane actually hit the building as she was on the other side but because she was told it was a plane then told you it was a plane ... it must have been a plane? The media and the real perpa-traitors duped us all that day. Instead of just believing what you are told why not look at the actual evidence and make your own conclusions from that?
luvmyctd 1 year ago
@blondebaby32681 "A friend of mine was IN the Pentagon when it was hit. If she says there was a plane...I'm gonna tend to believe her." Fire Chief Ed Plaugher, who was in charge at the Pentagon on 911 said: "there are some small pieces of aircraft visible from the interior during this fire-fighting operation I'm talking about, but not large sections. In other words, there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing." It's not believable that there would be no large pieces.
jackson32 1 year ago
She said it was a plane, but she was on the other side of the building when it hit? lol Do you even realize what you are saying?
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
this dude changed his story 18 months later, now in interviews and on tv he says he saw the wreckage, photographed it, in one interview on you tube he says he picked up pieces, like fuck he did, it wasa secure scene the media were'nt allowed within 100 yards. i heard some rumours etc re: huge numbers of people not turning up to work at pentagon and towers that day? anything to back that up on here?
bigmac1979 3 years ago
the what happened to the passengers in the plane
pilgrim1222 3 years ago
Sorry I know someone who died that day, and also someone who survied. He saw a plane! He was saying it well before anyone put it in his mind, or before he had her about the trade center.
Momoftwinsplus1 3 years ago
Lol, and years later he changed his story saying there was a plane visible.
Dicktaa 3 years ago
I initially thought that this was done by a plane...now...I too am beginning to suspect something is up.
BigBoiJC 3 years ago
The whole point of 911 was a reason to go to war for US selfish ambitions AND to sign the Patriot ActII that was sighned without congress oversight. It gives the govt more control over citizens and takes away all rights for the people. So if they wish they can tap your phones, enter your house, put you in jail and deem you guilty till proven innocent. Justice and law courts are on their way out and the doors are wide open for the president to issue MARTIAL LAW.
jiminiflix 3 years ago
yep - we bombed ourselves so we could invade a douchbag country and sacrifice ourselves, friends and loved ones just to make the price of oil go up forselves - you're a genius - think of this all on your own?
wkwickham 3 years ago
"September Clues" check this out if you are uneducated.
jiminiflix 3 years ago
It was hit by a missile and so were the towers!! The planes we saw on tv were delayed forcast and they were CGI drawn images with many mistakes. This ia a proven fact and the media under CFR have made this into a massive hoax. The Trade towers were detonated in multi layers including tower 7 with c4 or eequivelant that burns at 3000 degrees. Jet fuel only burns at 1900. Steel melts at 2500 degrees. Thats why molten steel was found at the base.The evidence was quickly buried.
jiminiflix 3 years ago
one thing missing - motive? besides, the steel would have cooled and hardened by the time it would have been found, unless it was incinerated at 10000 degrees or something.
LegoFan970 3 years ago
Motive isn't missing either because the Neo-conservative Project for a New American Century was pretty much followed to the letter. They got to flex their muscles overseas and marginalize the rights of the people at home, giving them more control both domestically and abroad, just as they predicted they would.
radioschizo 3 years ago
you have a point. while i don't believe that bush was responsible for 9/11, he certainly did exploit it.
LegoFan970 3 years ago
It's odd that the security camera that caught the crash was in a second by second frame. The government is smart enough to realize that a security camera focused on the Pentagon needs to be more concise so a whole event can be recorded instead of little bits of it. And the camera left out the most important part of the attack-the plane making contact with the pentagon. The attacks were a conspiracy.
Corocco1 3 years ago
What's even funnier is that one of the most secure buildings in the country had only one video of one of the most important events in American history. A video that was only like 5 frames long. When you can clearly see half a dozen cameras just along the building itself. That and the video footage from a convenience store across the street that was confiscated by the government(I forget which specific agency) and never released. A plane over 100 feet wide doesn't fit in a 60 foot hole.
radioschizo 3 years ago
What hhas the government done with eyewitnesses of the event?
Corocco1 3 years ago
people say they saw a plane because they're told a plane crashed there. They've psychologically written out the possibility of it being something else, though I don't know that many people come forward with any evidence of a plane being there that day. even the police will tell you that eyewitness accounts are unreliable. look at other pictures of the crash site and you won't see any plane parts and a hole too small to fit a 757 in it.
radioschizo 3 years ago
the hole being too small - that happened with the Empire state building too, in 1945 when it was hit with a b-25. i'm not sure why that happens, but the empire definitely was hit by a plane.
LegoFan970 3 years ago
i think i remember them saying that the pentagon attack was faked or somthing like that wasnt it???
thomas242007 3 years ago
i saw that
gmcfui 3 years ago
This footage was just a reporters initial opinion freshly after the event happened.
Point4Dave 3 years ago
dude, planes are aluminum cans, not very thick, this one was filled with fuel. The Pentagon is made of reinforced concrete, its DESIGNED to withstand attacks from high power weapons. The plane was going so fast that it disinigrated on impact, and the heat of the explosion was immense, melting away the plane in milliseconds. There was no large pieces of debris to smash through the building. The Pentagons structure withstood the heat and shockwave.
Shades90 3 years ago
are you a scholar? what degrees do you have?
goldenskatearmy 3 years ago
How about the titanium engines you fool? How about the SAM that are around the Pentagon? How about all the air bases right in the DC area that had PLENTY of time to scramble jets? Get a clue. Government IS composed of people. People have flaws.
9/11 was a Mossad/CIA joint venture.
crackahcrackah 3 years ago
the engines of the plane were 11 foot long 9 foot high and made of titanium alloy, your talking complete crap, when in the history of air crashes has a plane ever spontaniously melted in milliseconds. Jet fuel is specilised kerosine not that mush different from your stove, listen to the lies comming out your mouth and have the balls to question your reality for just a minute. They claim that the hole was 75 foot wide???!!! the film and pictures completely refute that. Wake up
keflar5 3 years ago 2
Yeah, the Pentagon is also supposed to be one of the most security-laden places on the planet. You mean to tell me with the plethora of mind-boggling security measures in place, there's no credible footage of what really hit the pentagon? Give me a break.
wolfenbreed 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bushkill.."everyone sitting at home just like you, while other people lose their lives on Iraq.".
You fuck head! Tell that to my 23 yr.old son-in-law who is a gunner on a Hum-V and got shot in the neck by a sniper 2 weeks ago!!
He can't talk or walk right now and is in ICU at Walter Reed Medical center!!
He may never walk again or be able to take care of himself because he was fighting for your right to post Anti-American bullshit!
And you say.."boo, hoo"
Ungrateful bastard!
marksman500 3 years ago
r the pentagon and the twin towers the same or different???
cuz they both crashed by a plane on 9/11.
born2act135 3 years ago
At 9:36 a.m., The Fish is Clippered up in real time to Hunter and US Navy Secretary Gordon England. BJ's bitch 'Dyke' is trying to track down the Pentagon Wedge 1 project manager for KPMG client AMEC. Fish is duty officer for the US Naval Command Center where AMEC is sabotage testing for a Global Guardian war game coordinated by Norman Mineta and the Desmarais family.
OperationMockingbird 3 years ago
(cont) Chic Burlingame or Hani Hanjour is the pilot of AA77. Fish yells "Dyke's perched on a cable reel outside my window. Looks like a Category IIIa [landing.] Looks like Raytheon's Skywarrior. Dyke's barking Abel Danger warning 'Bugger, Bugger, BEAGLES!' Semper Fi. God help us all." Line goes dead.
OperationMockingbird 3 years ago
Thats very interesting could you tell me where can i get that info on the net please mate, about fish and AMEC
keflar5 3 years ago
MMMM I heardly clearly in this clip that the plane hit dirctly into the pentagon itself. In the entire interview he says repeatedly that a plane flew into the pentagon.
The beginning of this clip he is just making it clear that it didn't hit the ground first.
What is the point of posting this clip! There is no mystery here. Do you have proof it was never again played again on T.V.?
No I didn't think so.
bilracer 3 years ago
As with the 9/11 truth others corrupted things need to be pointed out so I suggest watching "Freedom to Fascism" on google...
maberry21 3 years ago
i have a question, but plz dont call me a retard or anything...is the pentagon gone too? or did they repair it?
xCrusher117 4 years ago
im not calling u anything bro but its still around i think..any1 help me out here is it still around?
WWERULEZ1000 4 years ago
Yes, the pentagon is still alive.
Provocarate 3 years ago
lol.
Colombian459 3 years ago
I can't understand where you people are coming from, and I have an I.Q. of 165. There is a relatively small but rabid group who haven't forgotten that they were driven out of Europe after they invaded it hundreds of years ago, or that they were violently opposed when they invaded the Holy Land. They are a vocal group that has expressed not just a desire but a crusade to convert or destroy all who don't believe as they do.
peggycats 4 years ago
this bullshit if that was the acutally plane it wud blow half of the pentigon even if it didnt go in to it could still destroy it. it was a only little plane why hasnt this bin seen on the newes so much because it to obvoisly its lie
wepimpspaki 4 years ago
Hey u know what I really think unless you were there you really shouldn't speculate - there are people effected by these ridiculous rumours and heresay... move on so that those grieving can move on!!
mildan96 4 years ago
Are you serious?? an 80 ton plane dissapears and all the bodies and people shouldn't ask not to continue to be lied to???
ourcause 4 years ago
it 9is possible for the remains to disapear, they could be wedged in to the groun, and stuff like that. You also have to remember the US government wont be pleased having inspecters in the pentagon, finding there secrets. so expect there to be little information on the reckage.
sockbucket 4 years ago
huh??????
ourcause 4 years ago
The pentagon is a government building. if you owned it...would you like evryone in there? inspecting....you know...all the news crews.....in the way.
sockbucket 4 years ago
A 20 ton aircraft could not have possibly disintegrated into almost nothing. Think of what you are saying!
jeongf 4 years ago
Take off weight, around 110 ton
Mantra531 4 years ago
i seriously argee with dallas..
iluvbrigitta 4 years ago
the reason there were no pieces left of the plane is because it DESCENTEGRATED!
dallas90de 4 years ago
The missing people will be used for testing new biological agents, just like the 2500 American POWs Henry Kissinger gave to the Russians in Vietnam.
How do you think the Russians developed the polonium200 that they used to kill Alexander Litvinenko this past spring??
saw3deer 4 years ago
Ok so you are basically calling all those driving past the pentagon on that day, those visiting the pentagon that day and those who live in and around arlington and who witnessed a plane travelling toward the pentagon all liars?? I think you have way too much time on your hands - that's my theory!!! Why don't you go and spend time with the families of the people who perished that day and see how they feel knowing someone is out there tormenting their one truth!!
mildan96 4 years ago
Actually if you read into it...most cases believe it was in fact a smaller airplane that hit the pentagon...not that there was NO plane at all. Just because they were given a reason for what happened doesn't make it true.
BluEyedTorment 4 years ago
yea and where did u get ur info from, google? dumb ass
xCrusher117 4 years ago
WHAT MISSING PEOPLE? GO DIG UP ALL THE GRAVES. YOU WILL NOT FIND A DAMN BODY. AND STOP WATCHING FOX NEWS.
voininatangra. org/modules/xcgal/albums/userpics/10484/8-5.JPG
4un4o 4 years ago
does the facade of this building look as though a plane hit it? Can you honestly say, using common sense, watching videos of other plane crashes, seeing the planes enter WTC, that a plane hit the pentagon? NO WAY! There is clearly something else involved here.
frenchdel 4 years ago
look up Flight 232 1989 siux city, the crash pics show a hole that is about the size of the pentagon, and you see LITTLE plane parts, thats bc metal hitting a solid object at a great speed dis-intigrates metal<<<
SSAufklaerer 4 years ago
Wow jaime, here you are certain that there is 'no evidence of a plane having crashed near the pentagon' yet later say it's clear there was a plane.
frenchdel 4 years ago
No Planes at pentagon but also no planes used on WTC!
NoPlanes911 4 years ago
the ANSWERS are all at 429truth DOT COM
Scholars For 429 Truth
meshugamikey 4 years ago
I agree there are some questions that need answers but the guys who made Loose change need to correct some shit they did some fishy editing.
smegthissite 4 years ago 2
the guys from Loose Change are disagents. Their job was to create a strawman film to coverup the truth. thats why they get promoted so heavily on the jew media and thats why they've been handing out FREE copies of 100000s and neglect for 18months to fix up the shit in their film.
Midex 4 years ago
HOW and WHO NOW KNOWN--
the latest film clips are now on my page
and per air-force/commercial jet pilot Field McConnell, exposes clearly
WHO and HOW 9/11 was accomplished, from the planes to the buildings-- just incredible, and factual
neilslade 4 years ago
I heard Jamie McIntyre on CNN like a year and a half ago now with his story changed saying that people that thought a plane didn't hit the Pentagon were wrong because he did see the tail and wings and seats and stuff at the Pentagon. I don't wanna say that Jamie McIntyre is in on the deal but why did he change his story? I just don't get that.
mrbengal 4 years ago
Fuck that its all propaganda....Stupid people why do civillians have to fight a war on terrorist no one wants to fight in a war.. osama and george should sort it out in the ring lol
brad213 5 years ago
The CNN reporter (Jamie McIntyre) said he was INSIDE the building at the time of the 757's impact; therefore he did not see the 757 crash into the pentagon, although there were dozens of people who ACTUALLY SAW the 757 flying over and crash into the Pentagon. He states "From my close up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane crashing anywhere near the pentagon" But You can clearly see large pieces of debris in the background. His inspection must not have been very close to have missed them.
marksman500 5 years ago
Well thank you for your insights, however I don't know if his judgement was as brazen as you suggest. With only about a 20 foot hole in the first layer of the pentagon, one might reasonably expect the wings to be located outside of the building, somewhere on the lawn. What about the engines on each wing? They couldn't simply disentigrate, there's no immediate wreckage of them to be found and there are windows no more than a few feet away of said hole still intact. Something just doesn't add up.
answerswithquestions 5 years ago
PENTAGON 757 EVIDENCE.. Parts with pictures found at the pentagon from a 757...Rim and Tire, Large & Small pieces of the aluminum skin with A/A markings, Parts of (2) Rolls-Royce Engines, a 757 Landing gear, Seats & Luggage, Deceased Passengers identified by Dental & DNA testing along with personal belongings such as Jewelry, pocket knives, etc. Dozens of eyewitness's that specifically state seeing the A/A 757 fly over and/or crash into the Pentagon.
marksman500 5 years ago
MARKSMAN500 - Rim that cannot be detached from it's landing gear by 'other-than' mechanical means and remain intact? Engine that has been "obivously" dismantled with its screws and sub-assemblies removed? Plane incenerating AND DNA? WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL?
scriptor409 4 years ago