Does sharp still make Aquos without quad pixel? Cuz I paid a fortune for my 40 inch, I see alot of tv's on you tube and it doesn't say quattron on them anywhere. Jus wondering what an average price is? I think I got soaked lol
i saw a sharp quad color tv today. is the most awesome fucking thing ever. i think god i waited to see it . i would have kicked my ass for buying anything less.
This is not anything new. You need Red Blue and Yellow. However Green is Blue plus yellow. So you already have yellow. anyone remember the prism experiment from kindergarten? T
@rubikman12 really to the human eye the primary colors are red, blue and green, yellow is not one. magenta, cyan and yellow are the primary colors of the paint.
@MultiJiles 3D seems more like a fad than anything until we can stop wearing those damned glasses (although the Nintendo 3DS could help change this), but I saw one of these in Best Buy and the PQ was AMAZING.
@bhanwar04 I agree, Sharp is definitely the most reliable TV brand I have ever used. My family has 10 Sharps in use in our house right now, with a few in storage, and a few given to our relatives (we buy a lot of TVs) and never had one fail on us. We tried a Toshiba once, dead in a month. :p
Doesnt adding a pixle mean that there is going to have less sharp picture since theres going to be less pixels of red green blue on the screenn compared to old screens. Or did they Increase the DOT PITCH of the screen?
Scientists estimate that an average human eye can perceive about 10 million colors.
Why the hell would we need our tvs to display "trillion"(yeah right :|) colors then?!
It's like the "I got a 1080p set so from now on every crappy broadcast will be magically displayed as if it was coming out of a blu-ray disc" make-believe all over again.
Its kinda pointless cuz everything is encoded in RGB, so its still getting the same 3 value rut. Mind you im sure its more vivid or whatnot, but OLED would still rape its quality in terms of color. This is just kinda gimick, kinda find it useless. Seen them in real life and im not really impressed. OLED blows it out of the water but a OLED TV that large is costly.
I really don't get this. RBG covers all of the colours. First of all, why is a pixel a mixture of two colors? Why don't they have cyan or magenta sub pixel?
My dog tells me it makes no difference how many bloody pixels or what subpixel of rgbqmil whatever, because he still just sees black/white.
I'm half-joking here. Anybody hear about the new theory that the colours are not actually on the object, but because that's what our brains tell us we see? Which would explain why dogs see only b/w, or some human animals are colour "blind".
This open a whole new world of philosophy, hunh? What if everything is actually gray.
@shinhyesung11 I don't "know" anything, but I can reason some of it out:
since they're including a 4th sub-pixel each pixel requires 33% more space than normal. Therefore less pixels can fit into the same space, ergo reduced resolution.
perfectly true, but if they can make the pixels smaller then other TVs made with those smaller pixels that don't have the 4th one will still be able to get more in. The size of the pixel is an external factor.
The Best Buy Avatar picture I saw was so detailed it was distracting. The best way to describe it would be -- have you ever watched the "extras" on a DVD where they show a scene shot on film (for the movie) and a second view of the scene through a TV camera (just for the DVD extra material?). Notice how the TV picture looks "real"? The display's rendition of Avatar looked like I was watching LIVE TV. The characters in close ups looked as real and detailed as the guy standing next to me.
@kingstoncousins that's called 60 frames per second, genius. What you were probably looking at was a TV that processes the image and adds in frames where it can to make it sometimes look like 60FPS.
Although my monitor does not have quad pixel technology, I can see a big difference at 0:37. I would like to see what color setting and what television is being compared here (cause I hate demonstrations that do not give accurate comparisons).
I would like to see this in person, because on my monitor is just looks over saturated. I also wonder if this technology is incorporated into the television without any drawbacks to black levels or contrast ratio, and response times.
@readynow12345 My sentiments exactly. Best Buy must be really proud of these because they had a huge one up at the entrance of the store that they used to show Avatar when it was released on disc. As you said, it really stood out. I've never been a big Sharp fan but these are fantastic tv's.
I can remember when they first came out with that 65 inch lcd, it was aweful for displaying any fast motion or even moderately fast it was a real joke.
A yellow channel sounds nice in theory, but how does it fit in with the color decoder? Which begs the question, What does this mean for color accuracy? A larger gamut maybe. Then it's all for naught if it skews from the standards that are currently in place (SMPTE-C or ITU-Rec 709). Just like xvYCC, this is more about marketing and TV sales.
I just tried 3D TV today at the store. I liked it but I wouldn't watch it 7 days a week (with those glasses). I need to see this sharp and see if it really looks better
Two ways to make color: addition and subtraction. TV's make yellow by subtraction...recall yellow is a component of green the requisite wavelengths of light are there. A yellow subpixel allows pure yellow to be produced using one subpixel, rather than two, thus using less energy. How well it works will come down to processing and how well Sharp implements it.
OOPS! RGB is addition...Red, yellow, blue is subtraction. rgbworld . com/color . php (subtrat spaces around dots to cut-n-paste the link. Great tutorial on this topic!
The first Sharp TV to get LED back lighting technology is the Sharp aquos LC 52 LE 700 UN. Additional features include UltraBrilliant LED system, a 120Hz refresh RATE THAT reduces motion blur and a viewing angle of 176 degrees. If you can do without the wireless internet connection and other more savvy widgets, then this TV is your best bet.
This guy is a moron that is speaking.. LOL, you can't understand him at times. Why this fucking moron for this presentation. He's probably from Orlando, FL.. lol
@leemailme The human eye works on two axis: Red-Green and Yellow-Blue. Also, RGB is not all you need - Even RGBY can't display colors with longer wavelengths than Blue. No indigos, no violets. Only magentas that loop back to red.
@Dirtfire Oy. I'm always getting wavelength and frequency confused. But yes, my point was TV's can't show indigos and violates. Really, blue sup-pixels should be removed and replaced with violate ones.
awsome idea for LCD... but the futer for tv's are all in AMOLED technollgy. AMOLEDS are expensive though, and this will give mid-range tvs a good boost in picture quality for the money.
@Masterdantexxl LED generally isn't what's making it so thin. LED is just a type on backlight. It is more easily put into a thiner TV though. LED lighting is brighter and produces more vivid colors and better blacks. I personally prefer TVs with LED lights instead of regular. My new computer came with an LED backlight and i love it! it is great for watching movies and videos online.
look pretty good, but i'd have to see it in person.
lol at all the fucking morons talking as if they can poop out this tv tech in their nightly stools. fuck off. Go get high off licking some stamps from your mental prisons.
@trollmeplox In comparison of knowledge available now to knowledge that was available at the same age. Its quite a large gap. By the time these kids reach the age of the engineers of these products; their knowledge will have surpassed those of current time. so in comparison you could say they know more. But This knowledge would have not bee possible for those that developed it in the previous generation. I'm 20, but i bet you when im 60 my grandkids wont believe we had computers in my years.
@NoVaSpY I agree. The yellow is being approximated at the receiver via post-processing . As I mentioned in my original post, " ... the receiver must be generating the yellow channel from the transmitted red and green information."
I don't know if any Sharp Electronics people are here to answer this, but: while I can sort of understand how having the extra pixel might improve the gamut, what I don't get is how the TV can ever know when to use the yellow pixels. Do any of the standard inputs or data sources have yellow encoded somehow?
Its real simple you see, when the signal calls for both the red and green pixel to illuminate at the same frequency they instead re route the signal to the Y pixel. It works for every single intensity level in between as well.
who is going to tell the difference if Sharp never mentioned the additional Y subpixel or the Quad Pixel Technology. human eyevision is alot more sensitive towards Contrast Ratio.
It's a gimmick. If the source isn't transmitting a discrete yellow channel, along with the RGB channels, the receiver must be generating the yellow channel from the transmitted red and green information. Also, if you add a fourth, yellow, color to the current RGB scheme, you must reduce the number of RGB pixels to make room for the yellow. It may "LOOK" better, but the overall picture has suffered a loss. "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear."
I'm very skeptical about this yellow sub-pixel thing. In color theory, yellow is a combination of RED and GREEN. So how can you get a higher gamut by adding yellow?
@jorge242: You do get Yellow using Red + Green... However, It's Color Addition by having one pixel being brighter than the neighboring ones... It's complicated to explain and understand.
Anyhow, with a fourth subpixel, you will get much more color boost.
you're pretty dumb, with light absorbing medium, the primary colors are CMY, and if you combine them you get black, it works in reverse with RGB and light emitting medium
@jorge242 there are many shades of yellow, green, blue, etc. Adding this pure yellow to a shade of red+green will give you a color that couldn't be produced otherwise. Same when mixing it with every other color. The combinations are basically limitless now.
I really hope that the TVs they use to compare against don't have their color settings fuked with. I would totally check and if they did, I would just push their TVs over.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I just got the new 60' aquos.. It's gonna arrive in a few hrs.
I'm upgrading from a 46' which I thought was big until I saw this(I've seen 80' plasmas, I know big tvs) to a 60' monster.
It's an early 2010 model so I'm gonna say YAY! I upgrade my TV each year, not only is it cheaper in the long run but costs way less.. of course I can do this for so long. My credit well to put it to dollars is around $50,000. So no tv is too expensive. But for a college kid + work it's still expensive.
@MysticTrunksHQ I'm fairly sure that any 60 foot TV isn't available through the normal retailers, and you'd probably need a building permit to install it.
I'm just mentally running down buying a new TV every year, versus... uh... NOT buying a new TV every year. In what way is it "cheaper", let alone "cost[ing] way less"? I guess I'm just not privy to the great understandings of the yellow pixel crowd.
what do you do with the other tv sell it on ebay for penny's on the dollars, I have a 52inch & would love to upgrade to a larger but what would I do with the 52inch sell it & make nothing after paying over $2000 of course this was over 2 yrs ago.
@malabarspyder disagree, we will see who comes out, prob samsung and sony...does sharp have 240hrtz? does it have 3d? and they was so behind on 120 hrtz adding to there tv, plus edge lite is shit! contrast ratio is better with backlite
bigest bullshit ever. Not only Sharp was never hi-end, they have to compensate for the bullshit they just commited with recalculation from RGB, which is not gonna provide any more color data than for other TVs.
@candywrapp i agree with u edge lite makes it nice and thin and gives u a shitty contrast ratio, i rather have a fat tv and not be so thing with a back lie and have a better contrast ratio. plus where is the 3d tv? and i did not heare him say 240hrz refresh rate niether!
Got the 46" Sharp Aquos led tv ...very amazing picture n sound
Youngthug562 1 month ago
This guys an idiot
membland 4 months ago
Does sharp still make Aquos without quad pixel? Cuz I paid a fortune for my 40 inch, I see alot of tv's on you tube and it doesn't say quattron on them anywhere. Jus wondering what an average price is? I think I got soaked lol
MultiJiles 7 months ago
i saw a sharp quad color tv today. is the most awesome fucking thing ever. i think god i waited to see it . i would have kicked my ass for buying anything less.
datzfast 8 months ago
BEST TV I OWN..ITS AMAZIN HOW MUCH DETAILS YOU SEE WHEN WATCHIN BLURAY MOVIES.
jprak712 9 months ago
This is false advertising... here's a video this guy magnifies into the screen. watch?v=zKT5sJwk1CY&feature=feedu
alabaska182 11 months ago
This is not anything new. You need Red Blue and Yellow. However Green is Blue plus yellow. So you already have yellow. anyone remember the prism experiment from kindergarten? T
rubikman12 1 year ago
@rubikman12 really to the human eye the primary colors are red, blue and green, yellow is not one. magenta, cyan and yellow are the primary colors of the paint.
dindonrosales 11 months ago
'
how come this sharp do not have 4 colors in my pager sidekick LX
bestamerica 1 year ago
Love this tv got it today. Got the 60" LED one
1Justeel 1 year ago
@1Justeel how much didja pay for it?
lexyota 1 year ago
got this tv about 2 monts ago love it love the way the colour shows up keep it up sharp
Dj2slick1 1 year ago
im getting mine tomorrow. Cant wait. ;)
a930601ndy 1 year ago
dude looks freakin nice..when im old enough and i have my own house first things im gonna buy are huge -ass screens >.<
Edwuadu 1 year ago
so what i have to watch sunflowers all the time to take advantage of the quad tech?
MrParanoico 1 year ago
I have the 60in Sharp Aquos lcd led tv.....brillant colors!!! Great for hardcore Sunday Football!!
swagonmars09 1 year ago
Just turn the contrast on your tv up..
xSpoz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Oil companies are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common people.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity now.
Look for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in youtube video search. Join the Revolution!!
dharmastipulate 1 year ago
i still dont see how this looks any better than a rgb tv, i guess you really do have to see it to see it.
italreborn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i saw this one at sears!!
qx125365 1 year ago
looks amazing but tbh a bit too vibrant
charliecobham 1 year ago
now we can see yellow card in English premier league. brazil clothing maybe sure hit
m50mm 1 year ago
can you turn off the blue piramid on the screen ?
visionfoxtrot 1 year ago
Too bad 3D is masking this great technology breakthrough. Oh well i bought one of these and not 3D. Next year every tv will have yellow in it
MultiJiles 1 year ago
@MultiJiles 3D seems more like a fad than anything until we can stop wearing those damned glasses (although the Nintendo 3DS could help change this), but I saw one of these in Best Buy and the PQ was AMAZING.
vantageIIx 1 year ago
Sharp is a very good TV brand. I bought a 20'' CRT TV 15 years ago and it is still serving us fine.
bhanwar04 1 year ago
@bhanwar04 I agree, Sharp is definitely the most reliable TV brand I have ever used. My family has 10 Sharps in use in our house right now, with a few in storage, and a few given to our relatives (we buy a lot of TVs) and never had one fail on us. We tried a Toshiba once, dead in a month. :p
vantageIIx 1 year ago
goo to wikipedia CIE_1931_color_space
the tecnology is really,,,,,
micasadigital 1 year ago
sharp are rubbish
cactuskid007 1 year ago
@cactuskid007 ,rubbish for dumb bastards who have a Samsung TV.I have a Quattron and its PERFECT!!
MegaMaster456 1 year ago
Doesnt adding a pixle mean that there is going to have less sharp picture since theres going to be less pixels of red green blue on the screenn compared to old screens. Or did they Increase the DOT PITCH of the screen?
master9716 1 year ago
Nice video !
krisachar 1 year ago
0:40-0:50 It looks like shit cause the camera can't create those colors(I think) LoL....idk
69LuCkYChArmZ69 1 year ago
Scientists estimate that an average human eye can perceive about 10 million colors.
Why the hell would we need our tvs to display "trillion"(yeah right :|) colors then?!
It's like the "I got a 1080p set so from now on every crappy broadcast will be magically displayed as if it was coming out of a blu-ray disc" make-believe all over again.
Belson20 1 year ago
Its kinda pointless cuz everything is encoded in RGB, so its still getting the same 3 value rut. Mind you im sure its more vivid or whatnot, but OLED would still rape its quality in terms of color. This is just kinda gimick, kinda find it useless. Seen them in real life and im not really impressed. OLED blows it out of the water but a OLED TV that large is costly.
IMattNovakI 1 year ago
@IMattNovakI
what about laser TV by Toshiba?
hyylo 1 year ago
Those demos sure look good tho, but how will it perform in person or at your home with regular TV programs airing on it?
OtomoTenzi 1 year ago
I really don't get this. RBG covers all of the colours. First of all, why is a pixel a mixture of two colors? Why don't they have cyan or magenta sub pixel?
brandontwb 1 year ago
My dog tells me it makes no difference how many bloody pixels or what subpixel of rgbqmil whatever, because he still just sees black/white.
I'm half-joking here. Anybody hear about the new theory that the colours are not actually on the object, but because that's what our brains tell us we see? Which would explain why dogs see only b/w, or some human animals are colour "blind".
This open a whole new world of philosophy, hunh? What if everything is actually gray.
vinishdo 1 year ago
@vinishdo actually no, that doesn't take account of the color spectrum. I think you're misapprehending the situation.
RoneciDesade 1 year ago
great tech i'm sure (not like i can actually see it tho :S)
but that guy really needs training in presentation technique.
Isanion 1 year ago
I Got Mine and thought it would be just a normal TV. but i was WRONG...
DJDrumrolls 1 year ago
Next one to post ruins the video.
127646z 1 year ago
Why edge lit? They should have made full LED backlit.
nylecrane2k7 1 year ago
I read that this technology causes a loss in resolution and picture clarity/quality. Anybody know anything about that?
shinhyesung11 1 year ago
@shinhyesung11 I don't "know" anything, but I can reason some of it out:
since they're including a 4th sub-pixel each pixel requires 33% more space than normal. Therefore less pixels can fit into the same space, ergo reduced resolution.
Isanion 1 year ago
@Isanion yes but you don't know the size of that pixel!!
maybe it's smaller than a regular rgb tv
onlyfornintendo 1 year ago
@onlyfornintendo
perfectly true, but if they can make the pixels smaller then other TVs made with those smaller pixels that don't have the 4th one will still be able to get more in. The size of the pixel is an external factor.
Isanion 1 year ago
at 0:37 i could se a huge difference
that is awesome
nice and juicy collor is how i nlike it
alexmini123 1 year ago
The Best Buy Avatar picture I saw was so detailed it was distracting. The best way to describe it would be -- have you ever watched the "extras" on a DVD where they show a scene shot on film (for the movie) and a second view of the scene through a TV camera (just for the DVD extra material?). Notice how the TV picture looks "real"? The display's rendition of Avatar looked like I was watching LIVE TV. The characters in close ups looked as real and detailed as the guy standing next to me.
kingstoncousins 1 year ago
@kingstoncousins that's called 60 frames per second, genius. What you were probably looking at was a TV that processes the image and adds in frames where it can to make it sometimes look like 60FPS.
brandontwb 1 year ago
how does it compare against an OLED screen?
hyylo 1 year ago
Although my monitor does not have quad pixel technology, I can see a big difference at 0:37. I would like to see what color setting and what television is being compared here (cause I hate demonstrations that do not give accurate comparisons).
I would like to see this in person, because on my monitor is just looks over saturated. I also wonder if this technology is incorporated into the television without any drawbacks to black levels or contrast ratio, and response times.
shinhyesung11 1 year ago
@shinhyesung11 we just got this tv today it looks pretty cool
bluejayy100 1 year ago
What's the difference in the series?
safarimandude23 1 year ago
What about the source, its coming from tv stations cable etc, are they incorporating this new color in there broadcast if not whats the point ????
readynow12345 1 year ago
@readynow12345 The TV stations do not have to incorporate the new color. I comes just from the TV. I am not sure how it works though
Evster96 1 year ago
I saw one of these tv 's at best buy I was very impressed with the quality it actually blew everything else away it was extremely bright.
readynow12345 1 year ago
@readynow12345 My sentiments exactly. Best Buy must be really proud of these because they had a huge one up at the entrance of the store that they used to show Avatar when it was released on disc. As you said, it really stood out. I've never been a big Sharp fan but these are fantastic tv's.
Thrillcekr 1 year ago
I can remember when they first came out with that 65 inch lcd, it was aweful for displaying any fast motion or even moderately fast it was a real joke.
readynow12345 1 year ago
Edge lit, LOL..
Deanzsyclone 1 year ago
affinity with sharp rocks
13vafanculo 1 year ago
A yellow channel sounds nice in theory, but how does it fit in with the color decoder? Which begs the question, What does this mean for color accuracy? A larger gamut maybe. Then it's all for naught if it skews from the standards that are currently in place (SMPTE-C or ITU-Rec 709). Just like xvYCC, this is more about marketing and TV sales.
Crp75 1 year ago
no point
RepresentingDesi 1 year ago
I just tried 3D TV today at the store. I liked it but I wouldn't watch it 7 days a week (with those glasses). I need to see this sharp and see if it really looks better
grogtgs 1 year ago
Two ways to make color: addition and subtraction. TV's make yellow by subtraction...recall yellow is a component of green the requisite wavelengths of light are there. A yellow subpixel allows pure yellow to be produced using one subpixel, rather than two, thus using less energy. How well it works will come down to processing and how well Sharp implements it.
aydx0001 1 year ago
OOPS! RGB is addition...Red, yellow, blue is subtraction. rgbworld . com/color . php (subtrat spaces around dots to cut-n-paste the link. Great tutorial on this topic!
aydx0001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The first Sharp TV to get LED back lighting technology is the Sharp aquos LC 52 LE 700 UN. Additional features include UltraBrilliant LED system, a 120Hz refresh RATE THAT reduces motion blur and a viewing angle of 176 degrees. If you can do without the wireless internet connection and other more savvy widgets, then this TV is your best bet.
visit us at ledtvscreens(dot)org
ledtvscreens 1 year ago
This guy is a moron that is speaking.. LOL, you can't understand him at times. Why this fucking moron for this presentation. He's probably from Orlando, FL.. lol
erix43 1 year ago
i want back lit
detryru 1 year ago
I love the George Takei Ad!! It made me look this up :D
bymoonbeam 1 year ago
yeah I wasn't paying attention to anything he said...i was just waiting for him to trail off and screw up his speech again
DarthGiorgio 1 year ago
i have a samsung LED tv and it looks batter then this bullshit yellow pixel they just want to people to think its better but its not
DJPROCK 1 year ago
why not 240hz?
HottBoi90210 1 year ago
I call bullshit on this. Sharp is lying. Two reasons:
A) They are ignoring colour theory. RGB is all you need. Go ahead and look at the "subscribe" button. Yellow enough? I thought so.
B) It's not like the TV signal is sending out a "yellow" channel, so any yellow information they are getting is from the red and green channel.
This is a gimmick.
leemailme 1 year ago
@leemailme The human eye works on two axis: Red-Green and Yellow-Blue. Also, RGB is not all you need - Even RGBY can't display colors with longer wavelengths than Blue. No indigos, no violets. Only magentas that loop back to red.
AdeonWriter 1 year ago
Comment removed
Dirtfire 1 year ago
@Dirtfire Oy. I'm always getting wavelength and frequency confused. But yes, my point was TV's can't show indigos and violates. Really, blue sup-pixels should be removed and replaced with violate ones.
AdeonWriter 1 year ago
Comment removed
Dirtfire 1 year ago
Comment removed
Dirtfire 1 year ago
Comment removed
Dirtfire 1 year ago
I want one of these tv's! Awesome idea, yellow LED pixel!
maxx0001 1 year ago
awsome idea for LCD... but the futer for tv's are all in AMOLED technollgy. AMOLEDS are expensive though, and this will give mid-range tvs a good boost in picture quality for the money.
pizzano312 1 year ago
There's no way to show quad pixel technology over the internet unless your monitor is quad pixel too, sigh.
savagesteve13 1 year ago 55
@savagesteve13 you have to see it to see it
lxndr33 1 year ago
@savagesteve13 that sir,is a mindfu*k :)
drozle 1 year ago
@savagesteve13
Yeah, you just got to see it with your own eyes to really appreciate it.
sHaRpLeDtV 3 months ago
Why would you get someone with a speech impediment to be your spokesperson? No offense to people with speech impediments.
root66tube 1 year ago
Dont buy led its to expensive!!! Who cares about the width of a tv if it is 2 or 10cm??!!
Masterdantexxl 1 year ago
@Masterdantexxl LED generally isn't what's making it so thin. LED is just a type on backlight. It is more easily put into a thiner TV though. LED lighting is brighter and produces more vivid colors and better blacks. I personally prefer TVs with LED lights instead of regular. My new computer came with an LED backlight and i love it! it is great for watching movies and videos online.
greenscreeningthings 1 year ago 3
look pretty good, but i'd have to see it in person.
lol at all the fucking morons talking as if they can poop out this tv tech in their nightly stools. fuck off. Go get high off licking some stamps from your mental prisons.
flarbton 1 year ago
@NoVaSpY i dont give 2 shits about this piece of shit tv. my tv works perfectly fine. i was fucking trolling. so please, keep feeding me dumbshit.
trollmeplox 1 year ago
Wait untill the verticle band issue rears it's head, and Sharp shrugs their shoulders in denial.
Won't EVER buy another Sharp product again.
knightflyte 1 year ago
i love how kids on youtube think theyre smarter than the people that create these new innovations
trollmeplox 1 year ago 38
@trollmeplox In comparison of knowledge available now to knowledge that was available at the same age. Its quite a large gap. By the time these kids reach the age of the engineers of these products; their knowledge will have surpassed those of current time. so in comparison you could say they know more. But This knowledge would have not bee possible for those that developed it in the previous generation. I'm 20, but i bet you when im 60 my grandkids wont believe we had computers in my years.
CoolConejo 1 year ago
lasertv got 100% colours?
lassek85 1 year ago
@NoVaSpY I agree. The yellow is being approximated at the receiver via post-processing . As I mentioned in my original post, " ... the receiver must be generating the yellow channel from the transmitted red and green information."
MrTubeType 1 year ago
Wish he would talk to me instead of to the invisible person to my right.
Thor17 1 year ago 3
@Thor17 I was about to ask: "Who the fuck are you talking to man? I'm Over Here!"
GaijinTenshi 1 year ago
I don't know if any Sharp Electronics people are here to answer this, but: while I can sort of understand how having the extra pixel might improve the gamut, what I don't get is how the TV can ever know when to use the yellow pixels. Do any of the standard inputs or data sources have yellow encoded somehow?
histrion2 1 year ago
Its real simple you see, when the signal calls for both the red and green pixel to illuminate at the same frequency they instead re route the signal to the Y pixel. It works for every single intensity level in between as well.
helio2 1 year ago
who is going to tell the difference if Sharp never mentioned the additional Y subpixel or the Quad Pixel Technology. human eyevision is alot more sensitive towards Contrast Ratio.
KakimotoRift 1 year ago
this guy has a serious speech impediment
YarGnawh 1 year ago
It's a gimmick. If the source isn't transmitting a discrete yellow channel, along with the RGB channels, the receiver must be generating the yellow channel from the transmitted red and green information. Also, if you add a fourth, yellow, color to the current RGB scheme, you must reduce the number of RGB pixels to make room for the yellow. It may "LOOK" better, but the overall picture has suffered a loss. "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear."
MrTubeType 1 year ago
edge lite sucks! it makes is supper thing, BIG DEAL, contrast ratio sucks, backlite is bettter
vacationboyvideos 1 year ago
I'm very skeptical about this yellow sub-pixel thing. In color theory, yellow is a combination of RED and GREEN. So how can you get a higher gamut by adding yellow?
jorge242 1 year ago
@jorge242: Red + Green = Brown...
You've missed out on Art classes haven't you?
beatsiz 1 year ago
@beatsiz OK smart-ass, then how does your TV produce yellow with red, green and blue?
jorge242 1 year ago
@jorge242: You do get Yellow using Red + Green... However, It's Color Addition by having one pixel being brighter than the neighboring ones... It's complicated to explain and understand.
Anyhow, with a fourth subpixel, you will get much more color boost.
beatsiz 1 year ago
you're pretty dumb, with light absorbing medium, the primary colors are CMY, and if you combine them you get black, it works in reverse with RGB and light emitting medium
kalashnikova06 1 year ago
@beatsiz
there are morons on this planet, geez!
there's a difference between LIGHT colour and mixed colour with paint!
both of you are right, but ot the same way
MrH4loFighter 1 year ago
In the CMYK color space, red and yellow make orange.
HoneycombAgent 1 year ago
@jorge242
No, Yellow is not a combination of RED and GREEN. Yellow is a primary color. No colors are used to make yellow.
WetheSheepleUSA 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jorge242
No, Yellow is not a combination of RED and GREEN. Yellow is a primary color. No colors are used to make yellow.
WetheSheepleUSA 1 year ago
@jorge242 there are many shades of yellow, green, blue, etc. Adding this pure yellow to a shade of red+green will give you a color that couldn't be produced otherwise. Same when mixing it with every other color. The combinations are basically limitless now.
Dirtfire 1 year ago
I really hope that the TVs they use to compare against don't have their color settings fuked with. I would totally check and if they did, I would just push their TVs over.
ToxicFrog 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I just got the new 60' aquos.. It's gonna arrive in a few hrs.
I'm upgrading from a 46' which I thought was big until I saw this(I've seen 80' plasmas, I know big tvs) to a 60' monster.
It's an early 2010 model so I'm gonna say YAY! I upgrade my TV each year, not only is it cheaper in the long run but costs way less.. of course I can do this for so long. My credit well to put it to dollars is around $50,000. So no tv is too expensive. But for a college kid + work it's still expensive.
MysticTrunksHQ 1 year ago
The creditors must love you..monkey
ToxicFrog 1 year ago
@MysticTrunksHQ You should use that credit to buy some friends that you can brag to.
P.S. Kill Yourself
88hammond88 1 year ago
@MysticTrunksHQ You should really throw out your TV as soon as it gets any dust on it or after each commercial; whichever comes first.
I was surprised you only went for 60'' and not the 90" model, are you doing ok financially?
CTyler7 1 year ago
@MysticTrunksHQ I'm fairly sure that any 60 foot TV isn't available through the normal retailers, and you'd probably need a building permit to install it.
I'm just mentally running down buying a new TV every year, versus... uh... NOT buying a new TV every year. In what way is it "cheaper", let alone "cost[ing] way less"? I guess I'm just not privy to the great understandings of the yellow pixel crowd.
aguyin734 1 year ago
what do you do with the other tv sell it on ebay for penny's on the dollars, I have a 52inch & would love to upgrade to a larger but what would I do with the 52inch sell it & make nothing after paying over $2000 of course this was over 2 yrs ago.
readynow12345 1 year ago
@readynow12345
On ebay, from an experienced TV Seller, it would go for about $1000.
Evster96 1 year ago
I was being cynical
readynow12345 1 year ago
I have the 52ni LED. EVERY friend who has seen it says its the brightest, most vivid TV picture they ever saw.
Sharp just leapfrogged the competition
malabarspyder 1 year ago
@malabarspyder disagree, we will see who comes out, prob samsung and sony...does sharp have 240hrtz? does it have 3d? and they was so behind on 120 hrtz adding to there tv, plus edge lite is shit! contrast ratio is better with backlite
vacationboyvideos 1 year ago
bigest bullshit ever. Not only Sharp was never hi-end, they have to compensate for the bullshit they just commited with recalculation from RGB, which is not gonna provide any more color data than for other TVs.
635574 1 year ago
i have the 42 inch aquos and i would love to have that tv
comedy2008 2 years ago
@comedy2008 you may take that back because its doesn't have local dimming its edge lit which is total bullshit for a great concept
candywrapp 1 year ago
@candywrapp i agree with u edge lite makes it nice and thin and gives u a shitty contrast ratio, i rather have a fat tv and not be so thing with a back lie and have a better contrast ratio. plus where is the 3d tv? and i did not heare him say 240hrz refresh rate niether!
vacationboyvideos 1 year ago