How on Earth could you not believe in God when he has given us the entire universe as proof? It's all set up like a computer with spheres that make every single pixel of creation with black holes sucking up objects and backing up their data just like a back up drive. The universe is so precisely programmed, how could it just happen? No computer simply starts wriiting programs and updating itself like the universe does. It's designed by the ultimate user.
@WebVManReturns Listen god is used to fill gaps in science, because saying I don't know is to difficult for people.
Plus if you look at the universe it's a chaotic mess, not a precisely programmed thing. It like saying earth is perfect for life when in fact it's not, but that does mean life can't survive.
And saying we are intelligently designed when are "design" is shit, and thats not a joke just compare us to other animals, and you'll see we are in fact of stupid design
It is?!? That might come as some surprise to all the elliptical or receding orbits that most planetary bodies exhibit, and might even shock the hell out of all those chaotic star-demises and galactic collisions. What kind of programming would you call that?
this movie looks pretty fun, based on evolution vs. creation, I like the fact that just 2 brothers made the entire thing, called EVOLUTION CREEK, look it up!
Belief in God may well be hard-wired into people. This would explain why people cannot give up belief in religions. From an evolutionary standpoint, our brains have useful functions that could lead to religious belief as a by-product. Among these are advanced agency detection - the tendency to look for who or what caused something ex. a noise (a good thing for primitives not wanting to be eaten. the ability to imagine minds other than our own, and attachment. We are programmed to believe.
@pdoylemi People do give up religion everyday. How then do you explain the difference between a person who can shed their beliefs and a person who seemingly can't live without them?
Thanks for pointing out some of the fantastical leaps people make from a simple, innocuous, statement in the bible all up to more modern practices. It opened my mind a bit about how people attempt to rationalize this.
Biggest difference between science and religion: When reasonably proven wrong science will admit it and search for the reasons why and how it actually really is. Religion will deny it, kill to mute the accusers or even try to incorporate it by all means ignoring basic logic in the process.
Religion isn't all bad it's the fanatic that make it bad.
Eloquent, poignant, funny, insightful and riddled with facts and sources. This is why I love your vids Thunderf00t, thank you for your amazing work battling the evil council of ignorance and fantasy. I guess that makes you the Logic/Reason League? XD
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY. Read this Internet article. Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustained. Even in an open system, there has to be an already existing energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! Read this Internet article. According to Newsweek quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space which could have reached Mars. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, etc., etc.).
Using logic and reason to inform and/or argue that religious beliefs are wrong is pointless. These peoples beliefs are not based on logic or reason but on faith. This means no logical or rational argument could convince them otherwise. And that, my friends, is why we laugh. What else is there to do?
me thinks venomfangx should dress like that ninja with glasses who teaches little girls. He'd probably get to score himself a girlfriend who could held take his mind off his current fantasies. Unless of course he was posing with his current boyfriend...
Also, doesn't he know that muslims have been making the same claim he's making in this video. Yes! the qur'an contains even more scientific information than the babble does. It tells of the big bang and the creation of the galaxies by allah.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation. Also read my Internet article, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! According to a Newsweek article quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.
you go thunderfoot! i love how u make your points. on the claims of the highly suggestible. u consistantly demonstrate a min lv of research in all your vids; wich inturn demand the observer know or have a basic grasp of the topic at hand. this is the difference b/w an aetheist and a creationist: atheist require to know and prove repeatedly what they claim, an creationnist does not have to anything , about anything at all.
I wonder why so many scientists believe in Christ then if believing in God is so useless? And why those many people who believe in Christ were the first to begin the nursing profession and began many of the first charities? And those who began prison reform, men like William Wilberforce etc, were they also useless? Indeed Christ has rather inspired man to further his knowledge than made him useless. Do us a favour and take your own head out of your arse. Then perhaps your reasoning will be clear
@grahame4647 The only and sole reason for this, is that until in recent history people were still ignorant and belief in God was more popular than ever. They didn't do these things because they thought Christ was real, they did them because they personally wanted to do them. Christ didn't give them knowledge, they just happened to have the knowledge and believe in Christ. Your argument is akin to saying Hitler did what he did because he was a vegetarian.
@grahame4647 Also, most scientists don't believe in God. Unless you mean scientists in history in which case the argument is as stupid because that was a time in which God belief was the social norm and often required.
@grahame4647 well take this for example if christ were required for these things or had any effect then shouldnt atheists do none of these things? bill gates founder of the world largest charity and founder of microsoft is an atheist. theres no evidence that christ had ANY effect on these peopls decisions.
In every arguement between atheist and any religious person the atheist is always the logical one who wins, but the religious person just blocks off the evidence and the facts. It's sad.
dont forget Jules Gabriel Verne predicted the submarine in his science fiction, you'd be amazed how many predictions in sci-fi become reality later, guess this is one of the basis for Scientology
3. You must take this with a pinch of salt because the bible was written a long time ago it was written in a different culture which is greatly different from our own so there thinking would have been greatly different. I, as a christian, accept that the Bible is not the most convincing of texts but the entire idea of a religon is that it's a faith to be believed in and not a fact to be proven.
i am personally a christian and i think that this creationist is not showing all of the information in the bible. 1. thousands of years before the world was discovered to be spherical the bible was talking about the world as though it were a sphere or globe. 2. A human has almost identical chemical make up as the average dirt and in the bible it talks about God making humans out of clay of the earth i.e. dirt.
And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.
New International Version (NIV) 8 Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor.
you can get to as high as outer space and try to point out all countries of the world, it is impossible because earth is sphere
bible is full of such old nonsense stories that it can slap its own face with its own hands, why would you guys defend an indefensible thing such as this
now Jesus can be 3 things, 1 insane 2 a liar 3 God
u dont hear ppl say hes insane because the stuff his says is full of wisdom
if he was a liar why would he die so painfully holding on to it, further 11 of the 12 disciples did the same, also soon after the caesar actively began to kill christians and, a fact, used their burning bodies to light the streets at night. thousands died, all for a lie? i think not, i think it runs deeper than that
@42lynchmob ...it is historically proved a man named Jesus, that talked about this stuff, exsisted
also just saying Jesus did lie doesnt prove anything, for 1 there is no point dieing for a lie, 11 of the 12 apostles died for the same lie? also 120 ppl witnessed the acension of christ and probably all of them died defending what they thought was a lie?
u my friend should at least approach from a point of logic...which you have clearly not
@42lynchmob prove wat? im not proving anything, im using logic to suggest that there is actually a very high possiblity that Jesus is God. unlike u, ur just saying he's not and thats somehow scientifically justified...wat reasons do u have?
@FishTurd69 If that person was a nut, it would be possible that he would die for his lie(which he may not have thought was a lie), look at various smaller cults, their leaders sometimes commit suicide with their followers for their faith. And there have been PLENTY of times when an extremely (somehow) charismatic person has got people to die for him, look to the cults again.
@RaveriusMax 1. no one has ever called Jesus a nut, u never see and insane person speak words so wise
2. cults are bred from man-centered approaches to the bible. ie, when they read it, its like its about them and not God. Thats why they called cults... and i dont think a cult could ever influence the world like Jesus did
@FishTurd69 1. Maybe no one TODAY calls him a nut, but people a couple thousand years ago might have called him 'That nut preaching down the road'. 2. While Christianity might not be a cult now, when it began, it could have easily qualified in any of at least 5 of the 6 accepted definitions of a Cult, and possibly even all 6, cannot be sure of the 6th as that would require me to know how people of that time felt, which I do not.
@RaveriusMax sorry, this might take 2 replies, i hope your ok with that XD. Matthew chapter 13 verse 54-55.
54 Coming to his hometown, he began teaching the people in their synagogue, and they were amazed. “Where did this man get this wisdom and these miraculous powers?” they asked. 55 “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas?
people didnt acknowledge him because their familiarity blinded them.
@FishTurd69 That's right, they were "blinded" by the fact that they KNEW Jesus was not divine, because they had lived with him all their lives, and knew all there was to know about him.
If seeing bullshit and calling it thusly is "blindness", then I am most assuredly blind, and you see very well.
it was because they knew him, they allowed their own concience to say he was orderinary ALTHOUGH they just heard wise words AND saw miraculous powers.
If u read the passage properly it said ,"they were amazed. Where did this man get...." meaning they were surprised to see he could say and do all this. which does not mean "and knew there all there was to know about him"
@FishTurd69 If they didn't know him, they wouldn't have been amazed. Let's not forget that this is fiction. What it actually means is completely impossible to know, without asking the author, given that he made it up.
they verse says they knew Him, and they were amazed by the things He said and did but because they thought they knew him they were mislead from the truth.
and
i dont know how but it is a FACT that a man named Jesus walked this earth and preached these things, this is FACT not because its my faith to say it, but it is agreed among MOST historians and people who research things at this time.
@FishTurd69 Don't lie to me. There are no facts to suggest that Jesus existed. The only way to come to that conclusion is by examining the pathetic attempts of the writers of the gospels to retroactively make Jesus match a messianic prophecy that they had misunderstood.
That being said, I do believe that he existed. It's even likely that he performed "miracles", which magicians do daily here in the 21st century.
So far, Jesus has done nothing to impress ME, and that is what matters.
@FishTurd69 Or it could be that the evidence for a historical Jesus pales in comparison to the historical evidence for, say, Emperor Ceaser Augustus. We have stuff he wrote, contemporary accounts of his actions and a huge whallop to British history to prove it xD
@LichQueenKathie actually u'd be surprised that its quite the opposite, as a matter of fact the leading arguement agaisnt is not enough witnesses, but there are texts thousands of years old that match Jesus
@FishTurd69 if you mean the dead sea scrolls well no they only hold the old testimate. if not then could you please list the texts so i and others could take a look at them?
@prind666 well, im not great with the bible, but i know there are multiple times that an OT reference is seen in the NT...other than that im kinda confused about what ur saying...
@FishTurd69 ya cathalocism is the original church of christ. puritans were the first protestants why btw plunged europe into religion wars up untill the late 1900 when the last one(ireland) was finnaly brought to an end. history teachers dont teach about jesus because well theres nothing to teach outside of the bible. if there is please list it and give an explanation.
@prind666 i have a slight idea about what ur talking bout (just say my english isnt top knotch) but defs catholicism was earlier than protestant, but at the time of the protestant reformation the catholic church had become quite corrupt and used the fact that common people couldnt read latin (bibles were in latin back then) and used it to control the people. the wars are extremeists sides of the faith. anything that is extreme isnt right
19 The Jews who heard these words were again divided. 20 Many of them said, “He is demon-possessed and raving mad. Why listen to him?” 21 But others said, “These are not the sayings of a man possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?”
and technically christianity isnt a cult because its completely different from islam, jewish, etc. theres a story in luke chp 16 and john chp 11. go to biblegateway,com and type lazarus and read the results
His second argument is also directly, word for word copied off of another creationist site.
except he doesnt even get that right
doctor Semmelweis is Austrian and therefore would be pronounced Veis not wise
and even if there were proven to be scientific knowledge in the bible that would only prove humans in the past discovered that knowledge it would never be proof of 'god'
Even washing in running water is definitelly not enough! We need special soaps and iodine in extreme cases. Sterile gloves are a necessity as well in many cases.
Right then now that's settled; let us ask a genius question to this nutty professor!
How did you evolve from a single cell organism with no ability to produce other cells but to multiply?
If you put a healthy living cell into a solution well conducive to life and give it a better environment than the beginning and puncture it's guts out; Will it then restore itself or evolve to anything??? Despite having ALL the elements needed for life? The answer my silly friend is... NO, never in a millio
Those 2 religitards should give it up and stone each other to death. Especially the fat fuck with the dumbfuck glasses, looking like he's holding in a dump.
Love the way PCS leans on his chubby prison guard looking friend-he should know Leviticus is against that sort of thing,near the bits about bacon cheeseburgers, mixed fibres and shunning women on their period. Maybe they should stone each other to death.
0:35 that's why I object to burqas, and all other full body clothing. All that girl is is just a pair of eyes; no visible identity and no visible personality. People try to rationalise it by saying it prevents them from being oggled by men, but burqas effectively take away freedom of expression. Ergo, women are being punished for the actions of men. Go figure.
"and Jesus called out to him" HA! Proof of the phone in the bible.
I have been giving some thought to the idea that christianity held back science during the dark ages. I do agree creationists are sciencephobs and held back many discoveries. That does not explain why the Chinese and Indians did not advance scientifically during the same time period and you can't blame christianity as they don't believe. Why aren't those cultures 500 years ahead of us?
@pchtermino1 In fact - according to what I have learned in my history classes - the ideology behind christiannity was a powerfull cultural vehicule for the advancement of science. It inspired the concept of machine-animal, man-machine and the reform paved the way to the industrial revolution in a very indirect way... (long story). Still, what really ''held back'' other cultures such as china who was, until 1500, the first world power, was the need. Unlike european, they did not needed...
@semperwhisper ...machines, steam etc as we needed it. Beside, Muslims and Chineses were far more advanced than european people until the late 15th in math, science and art. But we have to thanks christiannity for our expantionnist spirit wich allowed us to conquered the world and wage war against every other nation wich, in time, forced us to discovered and research technology... well... that is a messy explanation... sorry... 2 years of classes in 800 words... but you get the idea.
The Bible maybe says 10000 things or more, so sure some of them were right by coincidence. but i'm sure if you go looking you'll find a lot of things that are NOT right.
I believe in Christianity very much but I don't believe it should be shoved down other people's throats as Mr.Paul said. My moral beliefs and fibers are mine and yours are yours. If you are truly against pushing religion or things of that nature onto other people then you should support Ron Paul.
I don't know why you even bother with creationists. In my country we say: "The one who tries to prove to an idiot that he's an idiot, is bigger idiot than that idiot!". No offense, but this videos are simply pointless.
@goranarsic Well they are not useless. His channel has a lot of scientific value. Also, I'm pretty sure, given the amount of views, that it has impacted the thinking pattern of at LEAST one creationist. If there is anything here that is pointless, it is your comment.
@BillHicks420 It is not about "impacting theirs thinking pattern". Any type of serious debate with "creationists" is nothing more than giving credibility to theirs claims, making creationism a serious subject that could be discussed which is much more devastating than "impacting thinking pattern of at least one creationist".
@goranarsic I agree it gives them more credit, but they will believe what they believe regardless of the amount of attention is given to them, so why not try to educate their asses as much as possible? Sure, most of them will not budge, but for the 1% that do, it is worth it.
I'd go further and say its state sanctioned mental illness - its the only pathological trait actively encouraged by governments and officials....all because people are scared that without it mankind would fall to pieces. In my view...the sooner we rid ourselves of this delusion the sooner we can usher in the next stage of our evolution. The ultimate problem is that cognitive evolution is so slow we may never get there :(
I'm a Paramedic. When I am called for crushing chest pain suggestive of a heart attack, I take 2 doves, dip their wings in blood, cleanse them with fire and rub them on my patient. If that doesn't work,....oxygen, I.V. With fluid, aspirin, nitroglycerin, fentanyl for pain, cardiac EKG and transport to a cardiac catheterization lab to be seen by highly skilled and trained doctors. It's in the Bible, really!
@paramattic70 Jaw drop....If that doesn't work???..god,can you imagine if it didn't...a lot of the other words you use aren't in the bible,did you make them up.LoL.
I see you've got a god stalker already..welcome to you tube.
Well, to be fair what the girl in the begining was reffering was the miracle of two lakes (or rivers I don't remember correctly) not mixing together thanks to the difference in the density. I am all for intellectual reasoning but I sometimes don't like when Dawkins' does stuff like that. I mean he is a real intellectual, that girl is not his type to debate.
Well, to be fair what the girl in the begining was reffering was the miracle of two lakes (or rivers I don't remember correctly) not mixing together thanks to the difference in the density. I am all for intellectual reasoning but I sometimes don't like when Dawkins' does stuff like that. I mean he is a real intellectual, that girl is not his type to debate.
Well, to be fair what the girl in the begining was reffering was the miracle of two lakes (or rivers I don't remember correctly) not mixing together thanks to the difference in the density. I am all for intellectual reasoning but I sometimes don't like when Dawkins' does stuff like that. I mean he is a real intellectual, that girl is not his type to debate.
How on Earth could you not believe in God when he has given us the entire universe as proof? It's all set up like a computer with spheres that make every single pixel of creation with black holes sucking up objects and backing up their data just like a back up drive. The universe is so precisely programmed, how could it just happen? No computer simply starts wriiting programs and updating itself like the universe does. It's designed by the ultimate user.
WebVManReturns 4 hours ago
@WebVManReturns Listen god is used to fill gaps in science, because saying I don't know is to difficult for people.
Plus if you look at the universe it's a chaotic mess, not a precisely programmed thing. It like saying earth is perfect for life when in fact it's not, but that does mean life can't survive.
And saying we are intelligently designed when are "design" is shit, and thats not a joke just compare us to other animals, and you'll see we are in fact of stupid design
TheSolitaryTraveller 3 hours ago
@WebVManReturns "The universe is so precisely programmed"
It is?!? That might come as some surprise to all the elliptical or receding orbits that most planetary bodies exhibit, and might even shock the hell out of all those chaotic star-demises and galactic collisions. What kind of programming would you call that?
Sheshader 1 hour ago
I like how the creationist (within tunderf00t's video) needed a dude wearing sunglasses to show how religion is serious business.
Halomainaic1234 6 hours ago
Comment removed
genesisr90 14 hours ago
People shouldn't laugh at creationists, they should ignore them.
ultrage4 22 hours ago
Thunderf00t is the prophet.
schroedingersdrache 1 day ago
Tifa equips Godhand and uses Final Heaven
IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW
Nixel85 1 day ago 3
Columbus landing on the moon? Wow, he got further off track in his search for the East Indies than I thought! :P
Dilandau3000 1 day ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
This has been flagged as spam show
this movie looks pretty fun, based on evolution vs. creation, I like the fact that just 2 brothers made the entire thing, called EVOLUTION CREEK, look it up!
chauncyhead 1 day ago
Belief in God may well be hard-wired into people. This would explain why people cannot give up belief in religions. From an evolutionary standpoint, our brains have useful functions that could lead to religious belief as a by-product. Among these are advanced agency detection - the tendency to look for who or what caused something ex. a noise (a good thing for primitives not wanting to be eaten. the ability to imagine minds other than our own, and attachment. We are programmed to believe.
pdoylemi 3 days ago
@pdoylemi People do give up religion everyday. How then do you explain the difference between a person who can shed their beliefs and a person who seemingly can't live without them?
RoCk4LiFe90 3 days ago
I would facepalm that lady unconscious and maybe some sense might slip in...
jensarni 3 days ago
Thanks for pointing out some of the fantastical leaps people make from a simple, innocuous, statement in the bible all up to more modern practices. It opened my mind a bit about how people attempt to rationalize this.
cloudstone123 5 days ago
Biggest difference between science and religion: When reasonably proven wrong science will admit it and search for the reasons why and how it actually really is. Religion will deny it, kill to mute the accusers or even try to incorporate it by all means ignoring basic logic in the process.
Religion isn't all bad it's the fanatic that make it bad.
Razzfazz87 6 days ago
Eloquent, poignant, funny, insightful and riddled with facts and sources. This is why I love your vids Thunderf00t, thank you for your amazing work battling the evil council of ignorance and fantasy. I guess that makes you the Logic/Reason League? XD
orwell9788 6 days ago
damn you thunderf00t for ruining my dream about this girl :((
xD
Great vid
cr4yv3n 6 days ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY. Read this Internet article. Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustained. Even in an open system, there has to be an already existing energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! Read this Internet article. According to Newsweek quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space which could have reached Mars. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, etc., etc.).
Mogley52 1 week ago
Who's the chubby dude with the odd sunglasses?
LarsWS 1 week ago
0:36 WTH is that thing??
elitotaku 1 week ago
@elitotaku
What thing
zly81 1 week ago
'mentally masturbating' oh Thunderf00t, why you so funny?
ssspe1 1 week ago
Why do people laugh at Creationists?
Because it's fucking silly...
Rethic 1 week ago
"Actually, before you start, let me just, for no reason, pull out this utterly unrelated Ray Comfort track"
Only after 3 or so minutes was I able to stop myself from laughing and finish the vid. Classy.
Strivingtoknow 1 week ago
Using logic and reason to inform and/or argue that religious beliefs are wrong is pointless. These peoples beliefs are not based on logic or reason but on faith. This means no logical or rational argument could convince them otherwise. And that, my friends, is why we laugh. What else is there to do?
Trynxdps 1 week ago 3
I get used to clicked on the "like this video" button before watching it for a some time now and it never fails me. Great job, Mr. Mason!
uvitek1 1 week ago
This video has more views then part 35 and part 37 because there is a hot girl on the thumbnail.
Amagusdrop 1 week ago 2
me thinks venomfangx should dress like that ninja with glasses who teaches little girls. He'd probably get to score himself a girlfriend who could held take his mind off his current fantasies. Unless of course he was posing with his current boyfriend...
Also, doesn't he know that muslims have been making the same claim he's making in this video. Yes! the qur'an contains even more scientific information than the babble does. It tells of the big bang and the creation of the galaxies by allah.
zaxxxon 2 weeks ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
@Mogley52 i love how people just believe in what ever they want and just choose the good things of religion.
Coopa826 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation. Also read my Internet article, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! According to a Newsweek article quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.
Mogley52 2 weeks ago
watch?v=FWTQmnrZiyg&feature=player_embedded
This is the reason...
Why we laught...
Homer3864 2 weeks ago
you go thunderfoot! i love how u make your points. on the claims of the highly suggestible. u consistantly demonstrate a min lv of research in all your vids; wich inturn demand the observer know or have a basic grasp of the topic at hand. this is the difference b/w an aetheist and a creationist: atheist require to know and prove repeatedly what they claim, an creationnist does not have to anything , about anything at all.
justtrolin 2 weeks ago
232,531 2/13 9:14 am
galerouth 2 weeks ago
I wonder why so many scientists believe in Christ then if believing in God is so useless? And why those many people who believe in Christ were the first to begin the nursing profession and began many of the first charities? And those who began prison reform, men like William Wilberforce etc, were they also useless? Indeed Christ has rather inspired man to further his knowledge than made him useless. Do us a favour and take your own head out of your arse. Then perhaps your reasoning will be clear
grahame4647 2 weeks ago
@grahame4647 The only and sole reason for this, is that until in recent history people were still ignorant and belief in God was more popular than ever. They didn't do these things because they thought Christ was real, they did them because they personally wanted to do them. Christ didn't give them knowledge, they just happened to have the knowledge and believe in Christ. Your argument is akin to saying Hitler did what he did because he was a vegetarian.
LagunaX1 2 weeks ago
@grahame4647 Also, most scientists don't believe in God. Unless you mean scientists in history in which case the argument is as stupid because that was a time in which God belief was the social norm and often required.
LagunaX1 2 weeks ago
@grahame4647 well take this for example if christ were required for these things or had any effect then shouldnt atheists do none of these things? bill gates founder of the world largest charity and founder of microsoft is an atheist. theres no evidence that christ had ANY effect on these peopls decisions.
prind666 1 week ago
LMFAOOOOOOO do people really believe this??? NO, it is a troll. impossible. ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
danieldvs100 2 weeks ago
What is appalling is that there are schools in the UK that actually allow young people like that girl to leave school believing that rubbish
IEndeavourAlways 2 weeks ago 21
In every arguement between atheist and any religious person the atheist is always the logical one who wins, but the religious person just blocks off the evidence and the facts. It's sad.
HellomynameisN 2 weeks ago 2
I feel like I'm trapped on this little rock, (earth),
hurtling through space at 65,000 miles per. hour,
surrounded by delusional lunatics who would rather
see me dead than to express the precarious
reality of the human condition. Great vid.
SuperDdy 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from Thunderf00t 41
Final fantasy indeed....we'll be consumed by that fantasy if we don't renounce it.
malozivcan 2 weeks ago
231,247 2/8 10:21
galerouth 2 weeks ago
i clicked because of tifa
barret1able 2 weeks ago
dont forget Jules Gabriel Verne predicted the submarine in his science fiction, you'd be amazed how many predictions in sci-fi become reality later, guess this is one of the basis for Scientology
KuhoinX 3 weeks ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
3. You must take this with a pinch of salt because the bible was written a long time ago it was written in a different culture which is greatly different from our own so there thinking would have been greatly different. I, as a christian, accept that the Bible is not the most convincing of texts but the entire idea of a religon is that it's a faith to be believed in and not a fact to be proven.
swgic1 3 weeks ago
i am personally a christian and i think that this creationist is not showing all of the information in the bible. 1. thousands of years before the world was discovered to be spherical the bible was talking about the world as though it were a sphere or globe. 2. A human has almost identical chemical make up as the average dirt and in the bible it talks about God making humans out of clay of the earth i.e. dirt.
swgic1 3 weeks ago
@swgic1 it is you, sir, has no idea about your own holy book
Isaiah 11:12 (King James Version)
And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.
now go find a corner in a sphere
KuhoinX 3 weeks ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@swgic1
Matthew 4
New International Version (NIV) 8 Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor.
you can get to as high as outer space and try to point out all countries of the world, it is impossible because earth is sphere
bible is full of such old nonsense stories that it can slap its own face with its own hands, why would you guys defend an indefensible thing such as this
KuhoinX 3 weeks ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
I thought VenomFang X was already proven to be trolling people lol
TheOnlySinkDiver 3 weeks ago
Keep up the good work!
DivineLucifer666 3 weeks ago
Job 26:7
He is stretching out the north over the empty place,
Hanging the earth upon nothing;
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
also good sir, u are using quiet bias information, because the stuff u are rebutting actually dont really matter.
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
i have a question...would u die for a lie?
now Jesus can be 3 things, 1 insane 2 a liar 3 God
u dont hear ppl say hes insane because the stuff his says is full of wisdom
if he was a liar why would he die so painfully holding on to it, further 11 of the 12 disciples did the same, also soon after the caesar actively began to kill christians and, a fact, used their burning bodies to light the streets at night. thousands died, all for a lie? i think not, i think it runs deeper than that
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 If hes even real, Jesus did lie.
42lynchmob 3 weeks ago
@42lynchmob ...it is historically proved a man named Jesus, that talked about this stuff, exsisted
also just saying Jesus did lie doesnt prove anything, for 1 there is no point dieing for a lie, 11 of the 12 apostles died for the same lie? also 120 ppl witnessed the acension of christ and probably all of them died defending what they thought was a lie?
u my friend should at least approach from a point of logic...which you have clearly not
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 Oh, ok, prove it.
42lynchmob 3 weeks ago
@42lynchmob prove wat? im not proving anything, im using logic to suggest that there is actually a very high possiblity that Jesus is God. unlike u, ur just saying he's not and thats somehow scientifically justified...wat reasons do u have?
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 If that person was a nut, it would be possible that he would die for his lie(which he may not have thought was a lie), look at various smaller cults, their leaders sometimes commit suicide with their followers for their faith. And there have been PLENTY of times when an extremely (somehow) charismatic person has got people to die for him, look to the cults again.
RaveriusMax 3 weeks ago
@RaveriusMax 1. no one has ever called Jesus a nut, u never see and insane person speak words so wise
2. cults are bred from man-centered approaches to the bible. ie, when they read it, its like its about them and not God. Thats why they called cults... and i dont think a cult could ever influence the world like Jesus did
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 1. Maybe no one TODAY calls him a nut, but people a couple thousand years ago might have called him 'That nut preaching down the road'. 2. While Christianity might not be a cult now, when it began, it could have easily qualified in any of at least 5 of the 6 accepted definitions of a Cult, and possibly even all 6, cannot be sure of the 6th as that would require me to know how people of that time felt, which I do not.
RaveriusMax 3 weeks ago
@RaveriusMax sorry, this might take 2 replies, i hope your ok with that XD. Matthew chapter 13 verse 54-55.
54 Coming to his hometown, he began teaching the people in their synagogue, and they were amazed. “Where did this man get this wisdom and these miraculous powers?” they asked. 55 “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas?
people didnt acknowledge him because their familiarity blinded them.
FishTurd69 2 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 That's right, they were "blinded" by the fact that they KNEW Jesus was not divine, because they had lived with him all their lives, and knew all there was to know about him.
If seeing bullshit and calling it thusly is "blindness", then I am most assuredly blind, and you see very well.
TheSmackerlacker 2 weeks ago
@TheSmackerlacker ...u misinterpret the verse...
it was because they knew him, they allowed their own concience to say he was orderinary ALTHOUGH they just heard wise words AND saw miraculous powers.
If u read the passage properly it said ,"they were amazed. Where did this man get...." meaning they were surprised to see he could say and do all this. which does not mean "and knew there all there was to know about him"
FishTurd69 2 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 If they didn't know him, they wouldn't have been amazed. Let's not forget that this is fiction. What it actually means is completely impossible to know, without asking the author, given that he made it up.
TheSmackerlacker 2 weeks ago
@TheSmackerlacker ???
they verse says they knew Him, and they were amazed by the things He said and did but because they thought they knew him they were mislead from the truth.
and
i dont know how but it is a FACT that a man named Jesus walked this earth and preached these things, this is FACT not because its my faith to say it, but it is agreed among MOST historians and people who research things at this time.
FishTurd69 2 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 Don't lie to me. There are no facts to suggest that Jesus existed. The only way to come to that conclusion is by examining the pathetic attempts of the writers of the gospels to retroactively make Jesus match a messianic prophecy that they had misunderstood.
That being said, I do believe that he existed. It's even likely that he performed "miracles", which magicians do daily here in the 21st century.
So far, Jesus has done nothing to impress ME, and that is what matters.
TheSmackerlacker 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
LockemShoto 2 weeks ago
@LockemShoto you know...for someone whos has faith in Jesus YOUR PRETTY AGROGANT
1. im australian, which means red necks r called bogans
2. im not poor so im not bogan
3. Christians are different from catholics
4. Christians (protestants) only have 2 sacrements, both of which i have done
5. archbishops are catholic and give more credit to the pope than the bible
6. History teachers don't teach bout Jesus because you cant learn everything in 1 semester
7. how do i misinterpret???
FishTurd69 2 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 Or it could be that the evidence for a historical Jesus pales in comparison to the historical evidence for, say, Emperor Ceaser Augustus. We have stuff he wrote, contemporary accounts of his actions and a huge whallop to British history to prove it xD
LichQueenKathie 2 weeks ago
@LichQueenKathie actually u'd be surprised that its quite the opposite, as a matter of fact the leading arguement agaisnt is not enough witnesses, but there are texts thousands of years old that match Jesus
FishTurd69 2 weeks ago
@FishTurd69 if you mean the dead sea scrolls well no they only hold the old testimate. if not then could you please list the texts so i and others could take a look at them?
prind666 1 week ago
@prind666 well, im not great with the bible, but i know there are multiple times that an OT reference is seen in the NT...other than that im kinda confused about what ur saying...
FishTurd69 1 week ago
@FishTurd69 ya cathalocism is the original church of christ. puritans were the first protestants why btw plunged europe into religion wars up untill the late 1900 when the last one(ireland) was finnaly brought to an end. history teachers dont teach about jesus because well theres nothing to teach outside of the bible. if there is please list it and give an explanation.
prind666 1 week ago
@prind666 i have a slight idea about what ur talking bout (just say my english isnt top knotch) but defs catholicism was earlier than protestant, but at the time of the protestant reformation the catholic church had become quite corrupt and used the fact that common people couldnt read latin (bibles were in latin back then) and used it to control the people. the wars are extremeists sides of the faith. anything that is extreme isnt right
FishTurd69 1 week ago
@RaveriusMax In John 10:19-21 it says
19 The Jews who heard these words were again divided. 20 Many of them said, “He is demon-possessed and raving mad. Why listen to him?” 21 But others said, “These are not the sayings of a man possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?”
and technically christianity isnt a cult because its completely different from islam, jewish, etc. theres a story in luke chp 16 and john chp 11. go to biblegateway,com and type lazarus and read the results
FishTurd69 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
"Try science, it works!" - Thunderf00t
TheFreak1ger 4 weeks ago
His second argument is also directly, word for word copied off of another creationist site.
except he doesnt even get that right
doctor Semmelweis is Austrian and therefore would be pronounced Veis not wise
and even if there were proven to be scientific knowledge in the bible that would only prove humans in the past discovered that knowledge it would never be proof of 'god'
whitesquirrel7 1 month ago
Even washing in running water is definitelly not enough! We need special soaps and iodine in extreme cases. Sterile gloves are a necessity as well in many cases.
That 20 century old book is useless.
fiddlergreen43 1 month ago
9:52 Tifa
SkyClawX 1 month ago
God is a final fantasy.
zulea123 1 month ago 25
@zulea123 so no matter how many times you beat it. someone will still come out with another version
rooftopsniper13 2 weeks ago
@zulea123 game...
bokkabonde 1 week ago
@zulea123
Yup, and if you believe in him enough, you'll go to his 7th Heaven, filled with Clouds
Zephyr7771 1 week ago
the line about the Bible harping on about one man and his bad weekend is one of the funniest thingsI think I've ever heard.
Thanat0s67 1 month ago
Right then now that's settled; let us ask a genius question to this nutty professor!
How did you evolve from a single cell organism with no ability to produce other cells but to multiply?
If you put a healthy living cell into a solution well conducive to life and give it a better environment than the beginning and puncture it's guts out; Will it then restore itself or evolve to anything??? Despite having ALL the elements needed for life? The answer my silly friend is... NO, never in a millio
1Truth4Mankind 1 month ago
@1Truth4Mankind *shoots him before he finishing his silly copy pasted spiel*
NathanWubs 1 month ago
@1Truth4Mankind You don't watch any of TFoot's videos, do you? He has already answered this, current living cells are not basic organisms.
BrianRegan5 1 month ago
I don't have enough thumbs up to give this video. You're a wonderful, brilliant man.
Strike86 1 month ago
Those 2 religitards should give it up and stone each other to death. Especially the fat fuck with the dumbfuck glasses, looking like he's holding in a dump.
TheCrimsonification 1 month ago
anyone else find the fatboy with sunglasses really irritating? Just what's he supposed to signify?
nanarockband 1 month ago
science, it works bitches.
red666111 1 month ago 19
Love the way PCS leans on his chubby prison guard looking friend-he should know Leviticus is against that sort of thing,near the bits about bacon cheeseburgers, mixed fibres and shunning women on their period. Maybe they should stone each other to death.
mrtisgodofall 1 month ago
WOH WOOOOH BACK UP.....she thinks I'm sexy!?!?
Diklypse 1 month ago
The mountains secure the Earth? It's the Earth that secures the mountains!!
saguhh00 1 month ago
0:35 that's why I object to burqas, and all other full body clothing. All that girl is is just a pair of eyes; no visible identity and no visible personality. People try to rationalise it by saying it prevents them from being oggled by men, but burqas effectively take away freedom of expression. Ergo, women are being punished for the actions of men. Go figure.
PsychoticSnake 1 month ago
i came here for Tifa :3
Dmaster2k 1 month ago
@Dmaster2k Same here and to laugh at creationists
Darconda90 1 month ago
You are great! Love your videos. Thank you. Your hard work isn't in vain.
Zackarot 1 month ago
I hope he makes more of these. :D
TyloniusKnight 1 month ago
I hope doctors generally wash their hands in alcohol, and not water, running or not.
ShmoothBall 1 month ago
@ShmoothBall Right before they drink it :D
ragerancher 1 month ago
science bitches, it works!
scribbie145 1 month ago
all power to the engines!!!
kirixen 1 month ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
BTW, Semmelweis was Hungarian.
zeldaofarel 1 month ago
You do love you're Futurama :P
JonnyVincent1 1 month ago
"and Jesus called out to him" HA! Proof of the phone in the bible.
I have been giving some thought to the idea that christianity held back science during the dark ages. I do agree creationists are sciencephobs and held back many discoveries. That does not explain why the Chinese and Indians did not advance scientifically during the same time period and you can't blame christianity as they don't believe. Why aren't those cultures 500 years ahead of us?
pchtermino1 1 month ago
@pchtermino1
How do you know we wouldn't be 500 years behind if we never made contact with those cultures? It's not something we can know.
KilroyTheGrand 1 month ago
@pchtermino1 In fact - according to what I have learned in my history classes - the ideology behind christiannity was a powerfull cultural vehicule for the advancement of science. It inspired the concept of machine-animal, man-machine and the reform paved the way to the industrial revolution in a very indirect way... (long story). Still, what really ''held back'' other cultures such as china who was, until 1500, the first world power, was the need. Unlike european, they did not needed...
semperwhisper 1 month ago
@semperwhisper ...machines, steam etc as we needed it. Beside, Muslims and Chineses were far more advanced than european people until the late 15th in math, science and art. But we have to thanks christiannity for our expantionnist spirit wich allowed us to conquered the world and wage war against every other nation wich, in time, forced us to discovered and research technology... well... that is a messy explanation... sorry... 2 years of classes in 800 words... but you get the idea.
semperwhisper 1 month ago
VFX has a MASSIVE homosexual crush on "Dr." Kent Hovind. I wonder if his chubby friend has a crush on VFX? Sad.
TheChurchOfKali12357 1 month ago
The Bible maybe says 10000 things or more, so sure some of them were right by coincidence. but i'm sure if you go looking you'll find a lot of things that are NOT right.
videofreek112 1 month ago
I believe in Christianity very much but I don't believe it should be shoved down other people's throats as Mr.Paul said. My moral beliefs and fibers are mine and yours are yours. If you are truly against pushing religion or things of that nature onto other people then you should support Ron Paul.
JamesRideout123 1 month ago
I don't know why you even bother with creationists. In my country we say: "The one who tries to prove to an idiot that he's an idiot, is bigger idiot than that idiot!". No offense, but this videos are simply pointless.
goranarsic 1 month ago
@goranarsic Well they are not useless. His channel has a lot of scientific value. Also, I'm pretty sure, given the amount of views, that it has impacted the thinking pattern of at LEAST one creationist. If there is anything here that is pointless, it is your comment.
BillHicks420 1 month ago
@BillHicks420 It is not about "impacting theirs thinking pattern". Any type of serious debate with "creationists" is nothing more than giving credibility to theirs claims, making creationism a serious subject that could be discussed which is much more devastating than "impacting thinking pattern of at least one creationist".
goranarsic 1 month ago
@goranarsic I agree it gives them more credit, but they will believe what they believe regardless of the amount of attention is given to them, so why not try to educate their asses as much as possible? Sure, most of them will not budge, but for the 1% that do, it is worth it.
BillHicks420 1 month ago
its worse than fantasy its schizophrenia
diegonikki 1 month ago
@diegonikki
"its worse than fantasy its schizophrenia"
I'd go further and say its state sanctioned mental illness - its the only pathological trait actively encouraged by governments and officials....all because people are scared that without it mankind would fall to pieces. In my view...the sooner we rid ourselves of this delusion the sooner we can usher in the next stage of our evolution. The ultimate problem is that cognitive evolution is so slow we may never get there :(
DIGITALSCREAMS 1 month ago
simple answer to the title....cause they is stoopid lol
pamabrah 1 month ago
all I heard form the msulims "We're brainwashed and if we dont say this we die! ahahahah"
TompanX 1 month ago
just came for the sexy tifa picture
LoveNoteProjects 1 month ago
To all college students. If you want to save $25,000 in book costs during the course of your higher education at Harvard, just buy a Bible.
paramattic70 1 month ago
I'm a Paramedic. When I am called for crushing chest pain suggestive of a heart attack, I take 2 doves, dip their wings in blood, cleanse them with fire and rub them on my patient. If that doesn't work,....oxygen, I.V. With fluid, aspirin, nitroglycerin, fentanyl for pain, cardiac EKG and transport to a cardiac catheterization lab to be seen by highly skilled and trained doctors. It's in the Bible, really!
paramattic70 1 month ago 68
@paramattic70 Jaw drop....If that doesn't work???..god,can you imagine if it didn't...a lot of the other words you use aren't in the bible,did you make them up.LoL.
I see you've got a god stalker already..welcome to you tube.
zobbukit 1 month ago
@paramattic70 "If that doesn't work..." but, c'mon, it usually does.
ODaemienE 1 month ago
@paramattic70 did u know the bible states that the earth is round...long b4 marco polo sailed around the world and finally confirmed its shape...
FishTurd69 3 weeks ago
where is the starting video with richard dawkings from?
unbreakable85225 1 month ago
@unbreakable85225 /watch?v=ulX8nZjeCXE
kuhj278 1 month ago
The Gospel of Star Trek is truth.
SuperBspb 1 month ago 53
@SuperBspb Live long and prosper, brother
TheNaughtypine 1 month ago
@SuperBspb All power to the engines.
TyloniusKnight 1 month ago
Why are a bunch of Muslims trying to convince Dawkins of the scientific validity of the Quran?
SuperBspb 1 month ago
Ray Comfort doesn't like "evolutionism", but he finds the right kind of banana easy to swallow.
cbooth2004 2 months ago 3
Been a long time...any more of these??? I've thoroughly enjoyed this series, it is rational, intelligent and well-conceived. Keep them coming! :)
MarkRosengarten 2 months ago
I keep half-expecting PCS to say "Hi there handsome" to the "tough-guy" in the glasses.
KajexFiredrake 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Was that Tifa Lockhart?
darkchibicosmos 2 months ago
As if running water was enough to kill germs... god pretty much failed to tell us about antibacterial soap.
offwithurhead 2 months ago
That's it. I'm subscribing! XD <3
JulzRulz1901 2 months ago
I love you thunderfoot!
Soetman 2 months ago
tifa
BandWagon1987 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, to be fair what the girl in the begining was reffering was the miracle of two lakes (or rivers I don't remember correctly) not mixing together thanks to the difference in the density. I am all for intellectual reasoning but I sometimes don't like when Dawkins' does stuff like that. I mean he is a real intellectual, that girl is not his type to debate.
Geckuno 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, to be fair what the girl in the begining was reffering was the miracle of two lakes (or rivers I don't remember correctly) not mixing together thanks to the difference in the density. I am all for intellectual reasoning but I sometimes don't like when Dawkins' does stuff like that. I mean he is a real intellectual, that girl is not his type to debate.
Geckuno 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, to be fair what the girl in the begining was reffering was the miracle of two lakes (or rivers I don't remember correctly) not mixing together thanks to the difference in the density. I am all for intellectual reasoning but I sometimes don't like when Dawkins' does stuff like that. I mean he is a real intellectual, that girl is not his type to debate.
Geckuno 2 months ago