Alex Jones breakdown of the Mysterious Death of Barry Jennings

[Merlin5by5]

Yeah, Barry Jennings wasn't murdered, that's pure rats ass lies.

Barry Jennings didn't die until 7 years after 9/11.

Usually the CIA has better people to kill, specially since Barry

Jennings thought No 9/11 Conspiracy was possible.

7 year old witness assassination? In your dreams.

[LikaPyramid]

Watch your back Alex jones!!! the elite schum are a threat every day!!

[imbetterthanyouis]

maybe it was because he was a 53 year old over weight american and all the health issues that go along with it

[cjnewson88]

"he begged us.. saying he'd been threatened .. if he didn't shut up"

*Of course, you don't need proof of this, just take my word for it, my name is alex jones, I never exaggerate, spin the truth or flat out make stuff up.. honest..*

alex is the biggest fucking liar I have ever seen. 'its mainstream', 'its well known','its been proven','we know'.. and the host of other rhetoric this idiot uses as 'evidence' instead of actual facts to prove his bullshit.

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 AJ"s ranting vitriolic delivery taken into account, I think that the Barry Jennings story is pretty compelling information that leads me. at the very least, to suspicion of domestic enemies, and not the ridiculous, unsubstantiated myth of 19 cave-dwelling fundamentalists.

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler Barry Jennings took back his statement, said he did not believe 9/11 was an inside job, and that he didn't "see" any bodies. He does not agree with these idiots, so they're trying to cling onto his false story by making up bs that he was being threatened. These guys are sick

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 I think you're being incredibly naive to take Jennings retractions at face value.

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler I think you're being incredibly disrespectful not to. The man was dying of leukemia, somehow I don't think covering up the 'truth' would have been high on his priority list.

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 Please show me a reference for this claim.

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler well to be perfectly honest, I cannot provide a credible reference due to two factors; the jennings family never publicly released barry's death certificate, and the only source I have for the leukemia claim comes from forums where a couple of people have to talk directly to one of barry's sons, and one forum where a post claiming to be one of barry's sons (which, I might add, is very detailed, but still not 100% credible). On the other hand, there is no proof he was murdered either.

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 I appreciate your passing that on. It sounds to me like his death remains shrouded in mystery. The only obit that I can find is from some type of newsletter from his employer. They don't disclose the cause of death. While you may disagree, I think you can understand why this would arouse my suspicion.

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler from a conspiracy theory point of view, perhaps. however it does not seem to make logical sense to me. If he was, as conspirators believe, a smoking gun, then wouldn't it have been logical for his death to have been arranged years ago? It makes even less sense for this to happen after he recanted, even less sense that it would be arranged for such a high profile witness. If they were into killing high profiles, wouldn't alex, dylan,jason and co be on their hit list too?

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 Despite the claims to the contrary, an inside job coup does not mean that we believe that we in the world of 911 truth believe the government is all knowing and all powerful, that they execute things flawlessly or that they can pull offer whatever they want whenever they want. The coup perpetrators/imperial clique of 911 are trying to keep the lid on a boiling pot in a frantic kitchen.

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 The facts are: no one is talking about Jennings death barring unsubstantiated claims on internet forums. Dylan Avery has stated that when he hired a PI to investigate, the PI returned a handsome sum and said never contact me again. For years this respected emergency professional stood by a story that didn't square with the official one. The NIST final report on bldg 7 (that came out right after his death) contradicts all testimony that collapse was predictably imminent from early on.

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler the collapse was predictably imminent from early on though; the building was on fire, there was no water to battle the fire because the towers took out the mains, and the firefighters knew there was nothing they could do but pull back, set up a collapse zone and wait for it to come down. no one was surprised on 9/11 when 7 came down, the police and FDNY were all expecting it to. NIST does a very good job of explaining it. I have read the report. Have you?

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler Firefighters knew that without water to put fires out, or to feed the sprinkler system, they could not contain the building. It would either fall that day, or be taken down later, there was no saving it. I don't know what report you're reading, but wtc7 NIST report is only 130 pages. Column 79 became unsupported when 9 of its supporting floors cascaded, causing the column to buckle and bow, causing a vertical progression of collapse to the rooftop, which then progressed laterally

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 NCSTAR 1-9, table 8-2, p 353

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler Right I thought we were talking about the final report here describing the collapse. Ok, so what exactly are you trying to prove here? p 354 is refering to figure 8-2(5) - the only figure on p 353 - which is a prescribed temperature graph they used for their model to simulate the heat of certain beams and girders. What exactly are you trying to prove by referencing me to this?

[GenSButler]

@cjnewson88 This supposedly very rapid temperature increase is the crux of NIST's claim that column 79 was shaken from the interconnecting support structure to bring the building down. In this short sequence (ostensibly) beams expanded and knocked 79 from its support bearings. it is the data used to posit a rapid and unexpected "thermal expansion" phenomenon. So much for all of the talk about the collapse being predicted all day.

[cjnewson88]

@GenSButler thermal expansion occurs whether the heating is rapid or not, thats why it didn't matter whether the model had this gradual temperature increase over a second or over an hour, the expansion is going to be the same, they effectively just sped it up for the model.

"So much for all of the talk about the collapse" - why don't you look at the dozens of figherfighter testimony and video saying there was no way they were going to fight the blaze. They all knew to pull back.

[HardcoreJungFunk]

@GenSButler Whether it his death is suspicious or not - In the larger picture, Barry Jennings has at least given his story, he was not take out of context when he was interviewed originally so the 1st hand evidence of explosions in that building still stands.

Honestly, people who believe in the official story should look at the sheer QUANTITY of inconsistencices in the story - and the sheer amount of coicindences defy the laws of probability for the story to be true

[GodlySkunk]

oh that drunken ira hayes, he won't answer anymore. bout the whiskey drinkin indian or the marine that went to war.

[LuigiTheSlasherFan]

The U.S. government killed him.

[daddystabz]

Barry Jennings was a credible 911 witness who claimed he saw explosions on the bottom floors and stepped over bodies inside WTC 7.

[campbell4show]

We need more people like alex

[G0560]

It is time for people to organize and come against the FCC and the media monopoly that is protecting these assassins.

[krefsrsgj]

good job alex GOD bless u

[dprogramdotnet]

Barry Jennings was a witness of the bombings in WTC7.

[Modacolorist]

Who is Barry Jennings?

[totolondon]

Barry Jennings was killed by cia