WTC7 Core Failure Propogation Visible

[MrPierrePhilippe]

The columns in the center had been cut, so as they go down,the floors tilt toward the

center.

The wave, is due to the reflection angle of the windows.

Anyway, this is IMPOSSIBLE without cutter charges; I meen, all the columns

removed within a second ? Get real !

Why arguing ?

I guess this was never showed again on TV.

I dont guess why.

[XPronger]

Thanks for this.

It was of course a controlled demolition.

[AbuZubaydah]

This 'shockwave' is simply the building bulging due to the internal collapse below the east penthouse.

[JSSTyger]

Hey femr2...

This video actually shows some flashes galore around the 0:15 mark. Debris or not...flashes everywhere.

[JSSTyger]

I like how the building balances itself on its way down. It tilts left and then goes back right.

[moogman5]

Wow! I'd never noticed that!!  Great catch...It goes left and then to the right.

[JSSTyger]

"Explain the 2.25s period of free-fall stated by NIST..."

NIST has discovered that the accel. due to gravity in NY was 14m/s^2 on that day. That means this was roughly 40% longer than a standard free fall (9.81m/s^2).They used shadow analysis to show that the sun creeped closer to the earth that day and thus its gravitational pull affected the earths own gravitational pull by making it spin faster.Collapse was iniated by a thermally expanded popcorn bag that blew up in the employee lounge.

[blueshadow1996]

What would make mye arguments more credable,is that I was the one who warned the towers were going to collapse and why.

[blueshadow1996]

Do you understand what deformation means? Why the term is used?

[blueshadow1996]

Fire makes steel,it can be used by blacksmiths to weaken it to shape it,after its done they have to temper it or it will break..I am trying to be as simple as I can for you femr2,.Notice the shaking of the building is falling down and then the penthouse caused by the fire.

[femr2]

Surprise, surprise. Kimmo is on your friend list also. LOL

[pixman83]

As far I as know, I'm not claiming to be an expert, the NIST sequence is entirely possible.

I haven't seen experts conclusively say "this is wrong, it can't happen, here's why" so I've largely concluded that its largely correct. Its not perfect, but such investigations never are.

Nonetheless, no competing theory I've heard (not that I've heard them all) answers nearly as many questions as NIST, is as thorough as NIST, and is as well supported by the expert community as NIST.

[pixman83]

You do realize that the progression of the "shockwaves" actually supports NIST's conclusion, right? Because those are WAY too slow be "shockwaves" caused by a singular detonation, and doesn't support the theory of multiple detonations.

The penthouse collapses first, collapsing debris causes the floors immediately below to collapse in series, and then the rest of the building twists as it falls shortly after. Which is exactly what NIST said happened.

[femr2]

I "quote" shockwave, as the best way to describe the behaviour, which is very clearly caused by the near-free-fall descent of the East Penthouse. Also clearly highlighted in the linked forum.

There is nothing on this video which mentions theories of any kind. And no suggestion as to the cause either.

The cartoon aspect of your belief is that the mass of the penthouse could cause progressive 'collapse', which is highly improbable.

You have not answered my previous question re sequence...

[pixman83]

Nobody is debating this. Its a well understood fact.

Which is why the theory mentioned is particularly broad and only relating to support generated by this particular imagery.

Improbable, but not impossible. Then again, we are still only talking about the conclusions garnered by the "shockwave" imagery. NIST's theory also says that the floors beneath the penthouse had started to collapse first, which helps explain the "shockwave" caused by the falling penthouse.

[femr2]

Whilst I remember...

watch?v=V-vbbckvSEk

[pixman83]

Good for you. You showed that somebody 1 stars every vid you make. So what? Its not like anybody really cares, or that one vote will really make a difference.

If anything, the humor garnered might make up for the time you wasted putting it all together.

[blueshadow1996]

Think about themodynamics..heat and motion...A system that is affected by heat..Thermal expansion.caused by fire.weakenig the steel and gravity bringing it down...Nothing complicated/.

[blueshadow1996]

You could see the collapse and the shock aas the trusses were giving out..Taking into the consideration it was burning for 7 hours, unchecked,on fire proofing rated for 2 hours..The weight of the steel would shake the building..It points to fire.

[CastingStonez]

Thats crazy...

the roof collapse left side first, then run down the left side of the building like running my finger down my horizontal blinds in my house... wow...

[nehorlavazapalka]

Wasn't the garage outside the tower¨s footprint?

[gutrp]

good video. iv seen the shock wave.

point out the shock wave for new comers

[femr2]

There's an annotation which highlights the area to focus upon. Hope it's clear.

[flanksteak2]

So let me get this straight.

You are claiming that puny bomb they planted (which you know nothing about) would have severed columns but then in the same breath claim than a airplane would have caused little damage to them?

[femr2]

You are attempting to employ the most primitive of 'debunker' tactics, namely the fabrication of non-existent claims and ill-conceived distraction.

I'm afraid I not going to indulge you in either.

This video relates to WTC7. If you have anything useful to say about the presented content, fine. If not, I wish you farewell.

[flanksteak2]

You have no proof that anything except a fire brought the building down.

That's the bottom line. You are employing the most primitive of truther tactics..namely the fabrication of non-existent claims which you derive from talking points you barely understand.

Until you have actual definitive proof that anything other than a fire brought down building 7, quit making videos.

[femr2]

No. Bye. lol. x

[flanksteak2]

You think that the truck bomb could have brought the tower down?

It hardly dented any of the columns.

Maybe your comments would be more accurate if you actually knew what you were talking about and weren't just pretending. LOL

[NeXtras]

They call them typos for a reason.

[NeXtras]

And i mean YOU ALL as in everyone who believes all the conspiracys, you realize conspiracys mean idead with no concrete evidence

[JSSTyger]

"And i mean YOU ALL as in everyone who believes all the conspiracys..."

This is the real problem here. Oh what the govt could do to us when we the people so blindly march our way through life. Conspiracy's don't exist eh? The very fact that you believe this provides the perfect blindfold. How do the rich and powerful keep getting richer and keep getting more powerful? They cut corners. They take secretive deals. They talk big and don't act. Like a greedy car salesman, they con you.

[NeXtras]

Not to mention, it would take a lot of charges, timed right to bring down that building, which means MANY different explosions, they dont all go off at once. Theres no record of many many explosions

[NeXtras]

there again, that "shockwave", being glare of the sun, can still be seen even AFTER the penthouse would have passed.

There were diesel tanks in that building that exploded, ignited by a fire set by the burning debi from the towers.. do some research, please

[femr2]

Excuse me, but LOL.

Get a grip son. There's no camera movement which would create the behaviour. It's absolutely connected to the internal descent of the East Penthouse.

If you are simply easily deluded, fine, but please be aware that I do not tolerate any form of deliberate misdirection on any of my videos.

[NeXtras]

They get the hell off youtube! Cant handle people comments?

If your going to put a video on here that is a CONSPIRACY THEORY you better be prepared for comments arguing it!

Did you know anyone who died as a result of the terrorist attack? DOUBT IT! I DO!

As far as im concerned, if you think OUR government pre planned the events, LEAVE THE COUNTRY! You dont belong here.

[femr2]

Your levels of assumption are staggering. I suggest you go outside and find some fresh air, so you can clear your mind of fuzz.

[NeXtras]

do any of you realize the way this "shock wave goes make no sense as to the way the building fell?.. your all wrong.. look again, that "shockwave" goes from top down.. now watch the way the building fallse, from thhe bosstom up, bottom floors went first... wow, u all need to look again

[WhyNotTruth]

It goes from top to bottom and then bottom to top. It is a typical demo style, check some other videos.

[prayfortruejustice]

My fav new report on WTC7 ... /watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s&NR=1

[prayfortruejustice]

Good video. You can see it on the right too. Did you enhance image in anyway or just zoom in?

Very good video, however it might be better if you ended with a brief clip of the BBC live news report announcing WTC7 had already collapsed (with the live "oops" shot of WTC7 still standing behind them) -- just for additional truth effect.

Please keep up the good posts.

[femr2]

Processing:

1) Each 'side' of the view is the separate interlace frames.

2) The video resolution has been doubled using SuperResolution processing

3) The dark copies have been colour range and contrast enhanced.

4) The second half of the video has been 'frame averaged'. meaning that each frame is the result of incrementally merging the previous 4 frames in the following proportions...1, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2.

There will come a time when I gather all my video's together in documentary style...

[prayfortruejustice]

Have you thought of doing a red blue tinted image pair slightly offset? Would that even do anything with the exact same perspective?

[femr2]

YT already has 3D viewing options, but then only allows low resolution viewing.

See

watch?v=MwIgSJ7M1GA

I don't have a set of glasses handy, so I haven't really tested it out much.

There's no real 3D information in this view, so it wouldn't be worthwhile for this clip.

The main reason for showing the split view is so that both frames of the interlaced original are included. If you chose to download and fold the frames back together, you'd end up with a double height, super hi-res version.

[femr2]

You may want to try 'crossing' your eyes to merge the two halves of the video together. It has an interesting effect on depth perception by merging each interlace frame together.

[fapexis]

i dont see it...hmm..help me out please :P

[femr2]

Have added an annotation on one of the views. You may need to watch in HD for best viewing.

I'll upload my reference copy somewhere and post a link.