Demolition of TU Delft Architecture - Partial collapse

[Kayaproducties]

1:07 ...

[0hno0]

that guy is having such a good job.

[delirichie]

what country is it in

[306gamerization]

how tall was this building?

[digit128]

@306gamerization

56 m, 15 floors.

[VCat2006]

@bungiebobawsome Concrete is great against fire, except that it turns brittle. Good thing it doesn't conduct as well as steel so the damage stays local.

[6evorev6]

One missing bit of info that all the Debunker idiots & Truthers are missing is the method of construction of this structure. What nature were the welds, type of steel, and how was it put together. This is another country with different building codes and not all buildings are built the same and construction companies are known to cut corners to save money

[charlesfloyb]

yes, NIST, referring to the concept of structural redundancy on WTC7, implied that there was none. Otherwise once column 79 failed, as they said, the other columns (about 99 more I think, 49 more core columns) would've held the building up. But NIST says once column 79 failed, all the rest fell like dominoes. And NIST won't share their "evidence" with the public. That is you can't get your hands on their simulation which is all they have for evidence.

[VCat2006]

@charlesfloyb watch?v=GOF6tk3llEQ that simulation?

[datzfast]

its falling into it own foot print, faster that gravity. there at it again.

[datzfast]

jesus christ he just taped it with that little soccer ball thing. and the whole fucking building fell in. what very large bird or aiplane had crashed into it. FUCK

[6evorev6]

@datzfast

Your dumb, I worked in construction and that tiny lil ball only looks small in comparison toe the MASSIVE crane it is attached to. That ball is 5X larger than a human being. That small ball can easily take down an new building. I can take down an entire wooden house with a 5lb sledge hammer. Also the entire building is still standing, This structure was also mostly steel rebar & concrete.

FIRE CAN NOT TAKE DOWN STEEL BUILDINGS!!!!

[datzfast]

@6evorev6 oh wow im being lectured 6 balls between floors that 36 feet who you think they are going to believe?

[6evorev6]

@datzfast

O shut the fuck up nigger

[datzfast]

@6evorev6 i bet you told your daddy to shut up one time also.

[datzfast]

@6evorev6 also your a racist mother fucker, i bet i fucked your mothers mouth or you would be my black son.

[6evorev6]

@6evorev6

Yawn, who cares, you'll be in a FEMA camp next year thinkin' maybe there was something to that whole 911 conspiracy thing

[VCat2006]

@6evorev6 Fire weakens steel. Weight bends weak steel supports. Concrete does not bend.

[6evorev6]

@VCat2006

True but not enough to cause such a catastrophic failure, also all the fuel had long since burned off during the initial explosion, only paper & fabric fueled the fire.

An if you want to stick your head in the sand with that failed science, then it should have only collapsed from the crash point UP, not the entire fucking thing at freefall speed - ASSHOLES! Am I talking to some FBI/CIA goons or something, fucking fascist murdering scum, no one can be this stupid!

[VCat2006]

@6evorev6 Columns were broken on floors 93 through 98 of the North Tower and floors 78 through 82 of the South Tower. About 13 and 10 percent of the towers' perimeter columns, and only on a few floors. Try saying that instead of hurling insults at strangers.

I'd counter with shearing floors, and you could show me pools of molten steel (not aluminium), and we'd both wonder what exactly could have caused such concentrated heat, bringing us to the thermate theory.

[Merlin5x5]

IF you had watched the fire portion of this video in english.

watch?gl=NL&hl=nl&v=7UrC7y_oE7­s

Even Truthers should see the ONE column failure of this

building that dragged down the rest of that portion of the

building. It's perfectly demonstrative of how WTC 7 fell.

[Membrane556]

This proves the official tale about WTC7 is baloney .

[murt9000]

A lot of masonry collapses but the steel structure is still present on all the floors beneath. This video proves that failure of a single column cannot cause the total collapse of a steel framed building.

[murt9000]

I agree with arunsak. this is a partial collapse. Ron Craig must know this bears no comparison to the total collapse of WTC7.

[Thetan1974]

Excactly. Craig is another "debunker" who happen to believe the official 9/11 fairy tale all the way. Every expert(?) who badmouth Richard Gage and other truth-investigators are simply in denial.

Show me a demolition expert, an ingeneer or architect, who come out ad say "I believe 9/11 was an inside job - but WTC 1, 2 and 7 did collapse due to the plane impacts and not by controlled demolition."

See, THAT would be interesting. False flag attacks are all about mass psychology.

[arunsak]

A professor from Ryerson Univ in Canada, Ron Craig, encourages people to watch this video because the collapse is identical to WTC7. This building did not collapse, it's nothing like WTC7.

Ron Craig gives Ryerson a bad name. He doesn't know what he's talking about, at all.

[Thetan1974]

Actually, I think he'd give Ryerson an even badder bame, if he came forward as a 9/11 truther. That's the sad outcome of the "I do not want to accept that the earth is round!"-effect caused by the false flag attacks of our our leaders.

[morekew]

Weer typisch treurig en kneuterig Hollands gedoe, een beetje sloopbedrijf gebruikt springstof voor zoiets, maar ja, het mag natuurlijk vooral niets kosten.

[Syrophrenikan]

please compare apples to apples. this building is obviously constructed differently than the WTC.

[uyoudecide]

isnt that ironic that its a building of architecture well at least it didnt collapse

911 was an inside job btw

[heatseeker213]

wasn't it an implosion on the towers? thats what alot of people say

[Thetan1974]

If you want a really great lecture of what happened on - and up to - 9/11, not just with the WTC implosions, I recommend the full lenght documentary "The Core Of Corruption vol. 1" which can be seen here on YT. Absolutely very well researched work!

[catanddogtv]

cool

[CheerUpOrDie]

This building burned for 10 hours, yet, no 7 second freefall like building 7 (on 9-11),

Hmmn?????

[RichardC111165]

This is what WTC7 should have looked like on 9/11/2001: a partial, messy, uneven collapse due to uneven fires and debris damage.

[visserlaurents]

You're so right!

[Bidimus1]

Gee, I missed the Structural girders falling 40 + floors hitting this building in Germany.. is it available on other video clips ?

[datzfast]

@RichardC111165 did you see the video of the partial collaspe i kept seeing what looked to be identical to the twin towers.

[VCat2006]

@RichardC111165 Correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't those concrete pillars?

[datzfast]

@RichardC111165 how can you have a partial collaspe of the world trade center? with what? fifty stories above ? held up by what? Luck?

[12weasel100]

@RichardC111165 no WTC7 was a steel frame structure that was 47 stories tall. The building shown here was only 15 stories (less downward weight on it), did not suffer structural damage from another tower falling on it. And more important clearly has a concrete core. The concrete is easy to see. The steel framing however did collapse same as the steel framing in WTC7 (that did not have a concrete core) collapsed. Try to learn something before you speak you retard.

[BlackmoonUK]

Haha! I kept saying 'You missed' 'You missed'. Who is in charge of the demolition crew? The Marx brothers?

[dubidubidub]

Waarom gebruiken ze nou niet gewoon een sloopkraan. Daarvoor hebben we ze toch :')

[Stivanovich]

as an arch student myself this is very sad to see! we had a lecture on in this building, during a study trip, two weeks before the fire. Can anyone tell what is going to happen after the demolition? are there going to be a new faculty? What about all the students and there ongoing projects, do they continue in other places?

[TheCrazy1One]

they are now stationed in the old main building of the university

[rooiemonique]

The reason for deciding for this slow peeling away is that the TU Delft wants to salvage irreplaceble heritage, like collections of books, drawings and maquettes. They also want to salvage -if possible - personal belongings like the work of staff and students. Then here's the collection of castleresearch projects conducted by prof. Renaud and his team, some of it must have survived in the cellars. Seems to me to be quite good reasons!

[Hfddrp]

This is going to take months! There has to be a quicker way to do this!

To bad it burned down btw, but nice that there will be a new building :)

[garycalgary]

some good smash action there

i am assuming you mean tulaine university in i think new orleans

otherwise i have no idea where this is

[digit128]

This is the faculty of Architecture at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.