we're talking about heavy 50+ton tanks using L7 105mm guns which are close in performance to 120mm L44 tank guns up to 3000 meters going against crappy soviets designs with mainguns not useful after 1600 meters, with absolutely no range finding devices, with no ability to use tank hull-down position tactics, and weighting at least 10 tons less in a time were each pound of steel counted for protection
@discovery110 "Panzer" simply means armour, it's short for "PanzerKampfWagon" or Armoured Fighting Vehicle... and no, as the video title states, it's a centurion tank, that was developed by the British in WW2, it was delivered just too late to take on the German Panzers.
@sethzky77 The Centurion ran on petrol, gasoline in the US, had a carburettor distribution system and was designed in the 1940s. No fancy electronics then to manage engine and no simplified driving. Try getting your hand on one and let me know how you got on with it.
In Denmark the Centurion was in active use until 1993 and the recovery version even longer. i remeber when we started them, 2 meter flames came out of the exhaust..
This tank got no protection for on top of the tank. If meet Army of exponent! first victic are the guys sit on top of the tank, unlike M-113 at leat you got some kind of cover from Ak-47 or something lighter!! Engineer need to look more this point,even from VN war to now THERE ARE NO IMPROVE AT ALL!
No power??? Idiot. Go do some reading.Performed well in Korea and with the Israeli army. Produced too late by end of 1945..it would have destroyed anything Germany had at that time.
@kcopy It was at its best when it had the 105mm. I am only quoting from a military historian who stated that the Centurion would have defeated any German tank in the 2nd world war. The 75mm is very effective.As used by the Panther and Stug.
I dont know what is your point. Th Centurion tank was a first class tank.
@banoffee2001 Centurion was armed/delivered with 82 mm gun equal I guess to 88mm german gun and armour somewhat lighter som it would have been a close shave- with the tiger 2
@exxalte Had lighter armour in the very beginning,but the sloped glacis plate was intended to make up for that. Considering that the main criteria for the design was to withstand a hit from an 88mm.
The MKI had a 76.2mm gun I think. MKII in production end Nov 1945,with improved armour
intel...you should change your name...you are far from smart or intelligent. Centurion tank one of the most successful tanks ever produced. Just ask the any Israeli. first produced in 1945 idiot..why compare it to an M1A1..retard
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@banoffee2001 But look, today if it was in use in battle with like the Egyptians it would not stand a chance against one of their M1A2's. So I'm comparing it to the present not the past. Egypt overpowers Israel anyways.
Whats the point of comparing 1940's technology with todays??? Pointless. Stating the obvious...i.e. F22 going to beat a Spitfire or Mustang.
Compare a musket with an automatic rifle. Israel has the Merkava..a more than capable tank. Israel already defeated the Egyptians..I dont think they would be too worried about them
yeah but if you see that it is designed in the late 1940's and was still in use in the mid 1970's...that is a prove that a good training can do anything;)
and the first Merkava tank (israeli tank) is in fact a Centurion tank that has gone back on the design table;)
we're talking about heavy 50+ton tanks using L7 105mm guns which are close in performance to 120mm L44 tank guns up to 3000 meters going against crappy soviets designs with mainguns not useful after 1600 meters, with absolutely no range finding devices, with no ability to use tank hull-down position tactics, and weighting at least 10 tons less in a time were each pound of steel counted for protection
@MSR8MASR Don´t forget the T-55 had a night vision device sooner than the Centurion. Which gave it a definitive Night Fighting advantage. Also the Syrian Training for example was really and I mean really crappy. Try to read "Centurion vs. T-55 Yom Kippur War" by Osprey, it´s an englightening book on it.
@LupusAries I have read according to some Israeli sources, or based on Israeli reports that the Syrians had night-fighting equipment for their tanks, now the Syrians have proven to be noncompetitive in battle several times, the Syrian military is best only at killing it's own unarmed ppl.
For Egypt, at the other hand, we had to rely on infantry-operated anti-tank weapons to support our soviet tanks against superior western tanks operated by the Israelis.
@LupusAries Also, the soviet armor fared well, when fighting western designs at close combat, where the advantages of range, and effectiveness of western main tanks guns were no longer applicable. At the Chinese farm.
However, attacking hull-down wetern tanks with much longer effective firing ranges, excellent air support, and the western world's newest anti-tank missiles, the TOW's, the attack was proved to be a total disaster. That's why Egyptian generals opposed this plan, but Sadat insisted
It is, designed late ww2, the first real main batte tank with a 4man crew, constantly upgraded and up-gunned it served for over 50 years, the red sea pedestrians used it to great effect in several wars.
Yes the centurion is still in use. I read that south africa and lebanon still use centurion tanks. They were equipped with m60 machine guns and a 140 mm anti tank gun and was shortened by 1 foot, the height got shortened by 1 foot and got wider by about a foot.
@KeyToTime It was British designed and built. By Swiss Centurion they mean a Centurion purchased from Britain by the Swiss government and used by the Swiss army
@thadutchguy what training?
we're talking about heavy 50+ton tanks using L7 105mm guns which are close in performance to 120mm L44 tank guns up to 3000 meters going against crappy soviets designs with mainguns not useful after 1600 meters, with absolutely no range finding devices, with no ability to use tank hull-down position tactics, and weighting at least 10 tons less in a time were each pound of steel counted for protection
thank the tank designers, not the crew
MSR8MASR 5 months ago
this is a panzer? i think panzer is an old german tank from 2ww and cold war.
discovery110 7 months ago
@discovery110 "Panzer" simply means armour, it's short for "PanzerKampfWagon" or Armoured Fighting Vehicle... and no, as the video title states, it's a centurion tank, that was developed by the British in WW2, it was delivered just too late to take on the German Panzers.
AgCCannonFodder 5 months ago
clumsy driver. Tank sucks.
sethzky77 1 year ago
@sethzky77 The Centurion ran on petrol, gasoline in the US, had a carburettor distribution system and was designed in the 1940s. No fancy electronics then to manage engine and no simplified driving. Try getting your hand on one and let me know how you got on with it.
Braun30 8 months ago
In Denmark the Centurion was in active use until 1993 and the recovery version even longer. i remeber when we started them, 2 meter flames came out of the exhaust..
merstrand 1 year ago
This tank got no protection for on top of the tank. If meet Army of exponent! first victic are the guys sit on top of the tank, unlike M-113 at leat you got some kind of cover from Ak-47 or something lighter!! Engineer need to look more this point,even from VN war to now THERE ARE NO IMPROVE AT ALL!
CharlieDoan 1 year ago
awesome!
T1w4z 1 year ago
they can have armored cars for all they care
no ones gonna invade them
M40 1 year ago
when i was in servise,i was at firing exhibition.one brigade received a new for those days merkava mark 3.
so they started target shoting from merkava first,and after that from(to be retired)Centurion.
it was very funny to see that reservists(who had plenty of experience) with old centurion,hit the targets much better.
so the joke of the day was that they shouldn't replace them : ))))))))
PS
for all the serious people,i know that the merkava crews missed cause they ware "green"
olejka2 2 years ago
Leo 1 and Leo 2 are the best tanks in Europa!
opckw147 2 years ago
@opckw147
leo1 best tanks in europa!? maybe 1975
the french leclerc , british challenger and the italian ariete are superieor to the leo1
the difference between the modern tanks (m1a2,leo2a6,t-90,k2,leclerc,arierte challenger etc) is very small
MrKellysHeroes 1 year ago
@MrKellysHeroes C2 has the best armour
supermorshu 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
scheiß bock , keine Power und zu schwer!
opckw147 2 years ago
opckw...Its one of the best tanks in history.
No power??? Idiot. Go do some reading.Performed well in Korea and with the Israeli army. Produced too late by end of 1945..it would have destroyed anything Germany had at that time.
banoffee2001 2 years ago 2
@banoffee2001 not! the 75mm canon was 2 week
kcopy 1 year ago
@kcopy Ermmm..what are you talking about? The Centurion had a 105mm gun.
Enough evidence out there to prove that it was a 1st class tank
banoffee2001 1 year ago
@banoffee2001 1st setup was with 75mm
kcopy 5 months ago
@kcopy It was at its best when it had the 105mm. I am only quoting from a military historian who stated that the Centurion would have defeated any German tank in the 2nd world war. The 75mm is very effective.As used by the Panther and Stug.
I dont know what is your point. Th Centurion tank was a first class tank.
banoffee2001 5 months ago
@kcopy The Sherman Firefly had a 17lb gun,which is equivalent to 76mm. Sherman Firefly could take out Tigers and Panthers. So...75mm is weak??
banoffee2001 5 months ago
@banoffee2001 Centurion was armed/delivered with 82 mm gun equal I guess to 88mm german gun and armour somewhat lighter som it would have been a close shave- with the tiger 2
exxalte 7 months ago
@exxalte Had lighter armour in the very beginning,but the sloped glacis plate was intended to make up for that. Considering that the main criteria for the design was to withstand a hit from an 88mm.
The MKI had a 76.2mm gun I think. MKII in production end Nov 1945,with improved armour
MKIII = 84mm gun then later with the 105mm
End of day...too late
banoffee2001 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That tank sucks.
intellegence63smart 2 years ago
It does, gasoline to make a producer happy.
The thing was contemporary to the M40 of Corean memory and at the time was considered the best tank in the western world.
Braun30 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Braun30 Yeah now that thing won't be able to face a line of M1A1s or even M60's.
intellegence63smart 2 years ago
intel...you should change your name...you are far from smart or intelligent. Centurion tank one of the most successful tanks ever produced. Just ask the any Israeli. first produced in 1945 idiot..why compare it to an M1A1..retard
banoffee2001 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@banoffee2001 But look, today if it was in use in battle with like the Egyptians it would not stand a chance against one of their M1A2's. So I'm comparing it to the present not the past. Egypt overpowers Israel anyways.
intellegence63smart 2 years ago
Whats the point of comparing 1940's technology with todays??? Pointless. Stating the obvious...i.e. F22 going to beat a Spitfire or Mustang.
Compare a musket with an automatic rifle. Israel has the Merkava..a more than capable tank. Israel already defeated the Egyptians..I dont think they would be too worried about them
banoffee2001 2 years ago
lahme kiste...
eod973 2 years ago
that tank is really hard to drive form what i saw on tv and read about it and horrible gas mileage just like A1M1 Abrams
one1939 2 years ago
yeah but if you see that it is designed in the late 1940's and was still in use in the mid 1970's...that is a prove that a good training can do anything;)
and the first Merkava tank (israeli tank) is in fact a Centurion tank that has gone back on the design table;)
thadutchguy 2 years ago 11
@thadutchguy what training?
we're talking about heavy 50+ton tanks using L7 105mm guns which are close in performance to 120mm L44 tank guns up to 3000 meters going against crappy soviets designs with mainguns not useful after 1600 meters, with absolutely no range finding devices, with no ability to use tank hull-down position tactics, and weighting at least 10 tons less in a time were each pound of steel counted for protection
thank the tank designers, not the crew
MSR8MASR 5 months ago
@MSR8MASR Don´t forget the T-55 had a night vision device sooner than the Centurion. Which gave it a definitive Night Fighting advantage. Also the Syrian Training for example was really and I mean really crappy. Try to read "Centurion vs. T-55 Yom Kippur War" by Osprey, it´s an englightening book on it.
LupusAries 5 months ago
@LupusAries I have read according to some Israeli sources, or based on Israeli reports that the Syrians had night-fighting equipment for their tanks, now the Syrians have proven to be noncompetitive in battle several times, the Syrian military is best only at killing it's own unarmed ppl.
For Egypt, at the other hand, we had to rely on infantry-operated anti-tank weapons to support our soviet tanks against superior western tanks operated by the Israelis.
MSR8MASR 5 months ago
@LupusAries Also, the soviet armor fared well, when fighting western designs at close combat, where the advantages of range, and effectiveness of western main tanks guns were no longer applicable. At the Chinese farm.
However, attacking hull-down wetern tanks with much longer effective firing ranges, excellent air support, and the western world's newest anti-tank missiles, the TOW's, the attack was proved to be a total disaster. That's why Egyptian generals opposed this plan, but Sadat insisted
MSR8MASR 5 months ago
Whats the Point watching this ????? somebody TELL ME
NatlusUKSA 2 years ago
Centurion-porn.. get it?
IRP01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sucks
sacoguate 2 years ago
Love the engine sound
Dallas700LAC 2 years ago
brilliant
stu57stu 3 years ago
gotta love that machinery, it sounds so like simple yet effective
poonjoo 3 years ago
I have seen of 1 that is privately owned in Australia. 4,400 were made.
frank234you 3 years ago 5
@frank234you in mareeba?
they are fucking sick.
45ccd 4 months ago
Comment removed
centi521 3 years ago
Comment removed
centi521 3 years ago
shame we did not get this tank in 1943 so many brave crews would have survived.
elswick1542 3 years ago 2
It is, designed late ww2, the first real main batte tank with a 4man crew, constantly upgraded and up-gunned it served for over 50 years, the red sea pedestrians used it to great effect in several wars.
bgingb 3 years ago
I thought the Centurion was a British tank.
KeyToTime 3 years ago
Sure it is.. But like so many tanks, they sell many to other contries.. But they are not in use any more.. The swiss army now use Leopard 2A4..
DrCanyonero 3 years ago
Yes the centurion is still in use. I read that south africa and lebanon still use centurion tanks. They were equipped with m60 machine guns and a 140 mm anti tank gun and was shortened by 1 foot, the height got shortened by 1 foot and got wider by about a foot.
CHARKELLYAZ1818 2 years ago
Oh i did not know. I thought it was gone. Thanks though it is good to know.
DrCanyonero 2 years ago
@KeyToTime It was British designed and built. By Swiss Centurion they mean a Centurion purchased from Britain by the Swiss government and used by the Swiss army
binaway 5 months ago