This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I wonder if in the aftermath of Pearl Harbour the American left were sitting around wondering "Why do the Japanese hate us?" and debating whether handing over Hawaii would be necessary to appease them or if the Philippines would be enough.
@DavidUK84 With those qualifications, I thought you'd have made a more thoughtful, and educated statement. I mean, rather than oversimplifying the interviewee's closing statements and bringing in a subject that is part of a completely different context. Pearl Harbor was an act of war, not terrorism, in response to the U.S. attempt at cutting off funding (which in turn would help to fuel their war machine). The reasons for attack are now, in hindsight, clear, straightforward.
@punkmusicmetal The issue of terrorism, and why people would want to attack the United States are not quite as straightforward. Some say it's our interference in foriegn affairs (which I feel as most likely) and others say that they hate our freedom. The point is, you're making a lot of assumptions (one being that there is nothing to understand about groups causing terrorism), and secondly, you're making some brash, biased statements and oversimplifying because it's "too complicated".
1. So contrary to your earlier bluster, you are in no position to question my historical knowledge.
2. Had you and your compatriots been around in 1941 you would indeed have been agonising about "Why the Japanese hate us" and proposing appeasement, rather than getting on with the job of defeating an act of wanton aggression. It was not a "response" to an American embargo" it was the continuation a decade of conquest which America was trying to impede.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"terrorist approval" --- what a tard,
by obama agreeing to sit down and speak to terrorists he's only legitimizing them. in the mean time i'll be sticking to "you're either with us or you're with the terrorists"
The resemblance to the West Wing storyline is uncanny. To date, President Obama is doing EXACTLY what he said he would do... so fingers crossed this will continue through the next 3.5 years... (hopefully the next 7.5 years but I'm not psychic...LoL)
Obama should keep his campaign promise to bring the troops home. Instead he has increased troop deployment. That's not keeping his promise. That's the opposite of keeping his promise.
He's right. One of the first interviews that the President gave was to an Arabic news network, explaining that the U.S. is not the enemy and wants to work with the Arab world to build up places effected by poverty and little access to numerous other opportunities for people growing up in areas of the Arab World. He wants the U. S. to be a bridge that can help to repair some of the past wrongs.
Yup. It's the audcity of hope president springing into action -- Doing exactly what he said he would do. I think it may take a while for people to quit looking for the strings. He's the real deal!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
very funny... still in irak , still lie about 9/11 , still torturing , still wiretapping , for the bank bailout package , gouverment control healtcare he said he would do it but trust me you dont really want them to control that!!! So good luck ! You need to take the gouverment back to state lvl to destroy atleast spying on people , military on the street ,federal reserve, FBI , CIA and really investigate criminal group inside gouverment of every country.
I had no idea...about this; Elie Attie, former Speechwriter to Al Gore
nascarkraz 3 weeks ago
who is this guy? sam seaborn?
wisnuops 1 year ago
Comment removed
wisnuops 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I wonder if in the aftermath of Pearl Harbour the American left were sitting around wondering "Why do the Japanese hate us?" and debating whether handing over Hawaii would be necessary to appease them or if the Philippines would be enough.
DavidUK84 1 year ago
@DavidUK84 haha. Thats not even thing same thing at all. Do you know anything about history?
punkmusicmetal 1 year ago
@punkmusicmetal
I have an upper second degree in history from a Russell Group university, and it's a lifelong hobby of mine.
Your qualifications? Do you have any?
DavidUK84 1 year ago
@DavidUK84 With those qualifications, I thought you'd have made a more thoughtful, and educated statement. I mean, rather than oversimplifying the interviewee's closing statements and bringing in a subject that is part of a completely different context. Pearl Harbor was an act of war, not terrorism, in response to the U.S. attempt at cutting off funding (which in turn would help to fuel their war machine). The reasons for attack are now, in hindsight, clear, straightforward.
punkmusicmetal 1 year ago
@punkmusicmetal The issue of terrorism, and why people would want to attack the United States are not quite as straightforward. Some say it's our interference in foriegn affairs (which I feel as most likely) and others say that they hate our freedom. The point is, you're making a lot of assumptions (one being that there is nothing to understand about groups causing terrorism), and secondly, you're making some brash, biased statements and oversimplifying because it's "too complicated".
punkmusicmetal 1 year ago
@punkmusicmetal
1. So contrary to your earlier bluster, you are in no position to question my historical knowledge.
2. Had you and your compatriots been around in 1941 you would indeed have been agonising about "Why the Japanese hate us" and proposing appeasement, rather than getting on with the job of defeating an act of wanton aggression. It was not a "response" to an American embargo" it was the continuation a decade of conquest which America was trying to impede.
DavidUK84 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"terrorist approval" --- what a tard,
by obama agreeing to sit down and speak to terrorists he's only legitimizing them. in the mean time i'll be sticking to "you're either with us or you're with the terrorists"
Cartoonski 2 years ago
@Cartoonski SO I GUESS CANADA IS AGAINST YOU AS THEY DID NOT GO TO IRAQ!!!? Simple minded.
syphe101 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama the false messia of the last days will not stand before the truth . He will decive and yes the people will stand up to the nwo. WAKE UP!!!
Fockthatbs 2 years ago
Watching the Obama admin unfold is how I imagine the unfilmed Season 9 of the West Wing, the first year of the Santos Presidency.
Plus, Rahm Emanuel = Josh Lyman.
Reggie Love = Charlie (okay, from the Bartlett admin)
DirectingJack 2 years ago 4
The resemblance to the West Wing storyline is uncanny. To date, President Obama is doing EXACTLY what he said he would do... so fingers crossed this will continue through the next 3.5 years... (hopefully the next 7.5 years but I'm not psychic...LoL)
nsb2008uk 2 years ago 17
Obama should keep his campaign promise to bring the troops home. Instead he has increased troop deployment. That's not keeping his promise. That's the opposite of keeping his promise.
Trident912 2 years ago
he still says he will bring them home. but in order to do this, he has to send some more first. u guys are not patient.
Vluppey 2 years ago 3
He's right. One of the first interviews that the President gave was to an Arabic news network, explaining that the U.S. is not the enemy and wants to work with the Arab world to build up places effected by poverty and little access to numerous other opportunities for people growing up in areas of the Arab World. He wants the U. S. to be a bridge that can help to repair some of the past wrongs.
bandibreath 3 years ago 15
Yup. It's the audcity of hope president springing into action -- Doing exactly what he said he would do. I think it may take a while for people to quit looking for the strings. He's the real deal!
casualobserver51 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
very funny... still in irak , still lie about 9/11 , still torturing , still wiretapping , for the bank bailout package , gouverment control healtcare he said he would do it but trust me you dont really want them to control that!!! So good luck ! You need to take the gouverment back to state lvl to destroy atleast spying on people , military on the street ,federal reserve, FBI , CIA and really investigate criminal group inside gouverment of every country.
Fockthatbs 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hopeinmanyforms . com
Copy and paste if you support our president Barack Obama!!
satansfatone 3 years ago