Out of context. There is science fiction type of probability that I'll admit to, if you ask a hundred times like Ben Stein did (probably to sabotage dawkins like he did), that the only way there can be design is if aliens from another planet sprinkled self-replicating RNA on our planet. But dawkins doesnt take that position. It was a hypothetical.
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
An Agnostic does not know if a god exists or not but rejects all man made gods.
I am an Agnostic and I don't know how a Universe so large and vast could have existed with time being infinite. i do accept the Big Bang but man it is only a theory and may change in the future as most of science does as it is self correcting.
Agnostics rejecting all man made gods would make him an Atheist in the same as different religions rejects the gods of other religions. We just go one religion further.
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
He was simply saying the possibility is there, that life was seeded from elsewhere, but evolution happened regardless, evolution doesn't even come into it.
Also what was all that crap at the end? Quoted verbatim "If there are people out there who really believe that if you're an evolutionist you've got to be an Atheist " - "since the evidence is overwhelming, I'll turn them all into Atheists". It's a fucking broken argument even when you quoted out of context.
I love the fact that this is tiny little clips negating the surrounding conversation. I believe this is called quote mining, or taking something out of context....or....lying. As for the Darwin 'quotes'....maybe, I don't know. Not that it matters.
Christians and other god worshippers of necessity have a well-developed skill for cherry-picking dogma and preferered moralities from manifestly primitive, immoral, and inconsistent holy books. Taking Dawkins quotes bizzarrely out of context and making absurd claims about them is precisely what one should expect from such people. Fraud and intentional deceit are essential and required ingredients in religionist belief systems and in religionist character.
Hes pointing to the fact that if there is intelligent design, that it would come from an advanced race bioengineering us. Not some mystical omnipotent being with a magic wand waving it around creating planets and solar systems in the blink of an eye. We are living proof that micro-organisms can evolve into advanced enough beings to some day make our way off the floating rock, who's to say it hasn't/didn't already happen 50 million years ago, somewhere else? Science people, not fairy tales.
The tearm is "quote mining". You scour the web for things you can quote out of context and then try to build a case using these little misrepresented snippets.
Charles Darwin only said such things in those letters because his wife was a devoted Christian. He was tormented by his discovery because he was questioning the beliefs of the women he loved. This video expresses possibly the most contradictory implication, that is simply just that.
are you so insecure about your intellectual position that you have to take dawkins' quotes from EXPELLED out of context? i suppose picking and choosing quotes and verses is what you creationists do all the time with the bible.
Out of context. There is science fiction type of probability that I'll admit to, if you ask a hundred times like Ben Stein did (probably to sabotage dawkins like he did), that the only way there can be design is if aliens from another planet sprinkled self-replicating RNA on our planet. But dawkins doesnt take that position. It was a hypothetical.
Johnf85 2 months ago
Quote mining out of context. How can you call Professor Dawkins stupid???
RuudVanDrijver 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
taking things out of context IS what they DO. Their Stock and Trade...who cares anyway?
LilithLorelai 5 months ago
Wow, this has to be the single most dishonest clip on Dawkins ever posted.
JoeNietzsche 5 months ago
An Agnostic does not know if a god exists or not but rejects all man made gods.
I am an Agnostic and I don't know how a Universe so large and vast could have existed with time being infinite. i do accept the Big Bang but man it is only a theory and may change in the future as most of science does as it is self correcting.
Agnostics rejecting all man made gods would make him an Atheist in the same as different religions rejects the gods of other religions. We just go one religion further.
MrHoolits 6 months ago
This video is disgusting.
Adix9512 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
He was simply saying the possibility is there, that life was seeded from elsewhere, but evolution happened regardless, evolution doesn't even come into it.
Also what was all that crap at the end? Quoted verbatim "If there are people out there who really believe that if you're an evolutionist you've got to be an Atheist " - "since the evidence is overwhelming, I'll turn them all into Atheists". It's a fucking broken argument even when you quoted out of context.
TheBreadfan 8 months ago
''And the designer could be someone else IN the universe, a smart alein''
Learn some Logic, Creatards.
gregrutz 9 months ago
I love the fact that this is tiny little clips negating the surrounding conversation. I believe this is called quote mining, or taking something out of context....or....lying. As for the Darwin 'quotes'....maybe, I don't know. Not that it matters.
skywize 10 months ago
@skywize The darwin quotes are like the others, so far out of context that they are lies.
JoeNietzsche 5 months ago
Instead of taker half sentenses out of context, perhaps you try to make tthe argument for your own case, after all the burden of proff lies with you.
Prove your god to us. Or at the very least make it case that he is probable.
neuromatiker 10 months ago
Christians and other god worshippers of necessity have a well-developed skill for cherry-picking dogma and preferered moralities from manifestly primitive, immoral, and inconsistent holy books. Taking Dawkins quotes bizzarrely out of context and making absurd claims about them is precisely what one should expect from such people. Fraud and intentional deceit are essential and required ingredients in religionist belief systems and in religionist character.
emaildoctor 10 months ago 2
Not cool my friend, not cool.
aprox23 11 months ago
Hes pointing to the fact that if there is intelligent design, that it would come from an advanced race bioengineering us. Not some mystical omnipotent being with a magic wand waving it around creating planets and solar systems in the blink of an eye. We are living proof that micro-organisms can evolve into advanced enough beings to some day make our way off the floating rock, who's to say it hasn't/didn't already happen 50 million years ago, somewhere else? Science people, not fairy tales.
HelplessPeon 11 months ago
This video was designed by a being of lower intelligence.
OhadAlmagorOhad 11 months ago 2
The tearm is "quote mining". You scour the web for things you can quote out of context and then try to build a case using these little misrepresented snippets.
parlezuml 1 year ago
Charles Darwin only said such things in those letters because his wife was a devoted Christian. He was tormented by his discovery because he was questioning the beliefs of the women he loved. This video expresses possibly the most contradictory implication, that is simply just that.
Howieeeeex 1 year ago
quote mining's dream
laidt0rest 1 year ago
The critical quotes in this video are taken way out of context. It is obvious, and not even a cheap trick.
friedie1jeff 1 year ago
even if dawkins actually believed what he said here, believing something doesn't male it true!!
ingodidoubt 1 year ago
It is really sad when you have to look to a dumb-ass like Ben Stein for help supporting creation hypothesis...
^..^
TheWildAssCopyCat 2 years ago
i posted the video so people can comment.
whereas the other video u can't even comment. freedom of speech people.
orient12ful 2 years ago 3
are you so insecure about your intellectual position that you have to take dawkins' quotes from EXPELLED out of context? i suppose picking and choosing quotes and verses is what you creationists do all the time with the bible.
khan0890 2 years ago 17
It must suck to be on the losing side.. Please keep making desparate videos like this one to prove my "Theory" lol
aowsbaker 2 years ago
yeah u fukin prick
amirdude 2 years ago
He was speaking hypothetically in the Stein interview. The question was, 'If intelligent design were true, how could it happen?'
Score one for intellectual honesty!
Telamnar 2 years ago 21
that is exactly the reason why i posted this video. so people can clear out the mistakes.
orient12ful 2 years ago