hmmm... another smear tactic video with no proof. If quotes from people BEFORE evolution was widely known are the cornerstones for your"argument"... then you sir, have no argument.
You have no argument. The relevant matter is not science, its politics. Blunderf00l was saying that Christians are not fit for office, simply for being Christians. But this video shows the evidence of that Christians are precisely who founded the country. The smearing was done by Blunderf00l
The video shows that the kind of people whom Blunderf00l & most atheists believe to be unfit for high office, are actually the same kind of people as those who founded the country
First of all, sentence construction please. Freaking hard to decipher.
I think you say the founders of 'the country" whatever that country me be. But I guess as only Americans would assume it's all about them it's the US you're talking about.
a) None of them was a Christian, not a single one of them
b) even if they were, that was before we knew were we came from, how we got here, hell it was in a time leechcures were high tech.
{I think you say the founders of 'the country" whatever that country may be}
I'm still torn between Evolutionists & Homosexuals, regarding which are more delusional??? You made that comment & yet, you think yourself the intelligent one? This video was a response to Blunderf00l's video which he produced specifically in regards to the Presidential elections campaign season which was occuring at the time. Therefor, yes, it is America that is being refered to...
Indeed, the Presidential elections were "all about us"... or does Britain have a President also?
{None of them was a Christian, not a single one of them}
Oh WOW, Evolutionists are so intelligent that even a Belgian one is going to correct me on my own country's history. BTW, did you know Belgians first brewed beer in Europe after learning of it from ancient Egyptian records?
Check out this nifty little "critical thinking" trick. In America, even atheists admit that during the founding era,
most of the general population was Christian. The lack of Hindu, Buddist, Muslim & Satanic buildings of worship... along with the New England landscape being dotted with red brick or white painted buildings with a tall white steeple, makes that fact quite undeniable. Thus, now we'll brilliantly believe that the people combed their state populations to find the tiny handful of non Christians from amongst them & send them off to "REPRESENT" them while founding a "REPRESENTATIVE" form of government
Pass me the red phone... yes, patch me through to NORAD... yes Commander Comrad Commodore... take us to defcon 1... indeed, its that critical... yes, the Evolutionists have been thinking critically again. I know, it happens every time... defcon 1 please. I'll inform you when their Ape-Like creature brains, inhereted from ancestral bacterial forebears have been morpholobotomized further into Mutard status. The what?... The battle cry of the Revolution? "rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God"
I stopped at 1:23. So...because we won the Revolutionary War, that means that our prayers were answered? "God" let it be so? If you are really able to convince yourself of that, then you're welcome.
Did I miss the part where it is proven that prayer stops bullets more effectively than Kevlar? Tf00t had an actual demonstration of an actual gun firing at an actual vest. Where is the demonstration of an actual gun being fired at an actual praying man? If you want to play in the realm of science you need hard evidence, not centuries old out-of-context quotes.
You missed the part between the left & the right ears. Thats why when you stand in a cross wind, you get that loud whistling sound effect. With a bit of well practiced facial orifice control, that cavernously configured, cranial cavity might yet be salvageable if it were ever to belt out a few measures of "Yankee Doodle Dandy Daddies" went to town when they put the redcoats on the ground. Then the King Most Ding-A-Ling knew they weren't mess'n around
How do you figure that you even have an argument? Let me guess, the Democrats are completely beside themselves, strung out on high tension G-Strings, anxious to bend over......backwards to help & provide greatly for the US military?
Hey realm reamed, welcome to the Ape Hunters playground. You have mutard meandered into MY realm. If the US military were ever to get vests, then you'll definitely be sport'n a well reamed realm gleam if you're putting your money on the Democraps to be giving em
My argument is that prayer does absolutely no good on the battlefield. Offering prayers to our troops is just a bit more useful than offering farts. The rest of your post is more incoherent babble.
It doesn't matter who she asks for prayers. THEY DO NO GOOD!! Praying, wishing, and hoping for something are the least effective means to achieving a goal. Demonstrate otherwise or go away.
Your argument is your merely subjective opinion of prayer. The founders of this country obviously had a opinion far different to yours. Carefully read the quote at 1:17 - 1:44. I'm certain you need comprehension assistance. He said that every sensible, defensive measure will be taken (that would represent inclusion of vests) However, they would not be 100% reliant upon mans own abilities. Mans fullest contributions would be employed only after recognizing & revering God as the highest Commander
whom if he chooses, may determine outcomes. "Without his whole blessing, even the best of human counsels (we'll overratingly attribute those substantially lesser counsels to Blunderfool) are but foolishness".(Hancock seemed to have psychically known of Blundy)
If the stage were set for war between the most powerful empire on the globe & some colonist "subjects" of whom many of their circumstances had been determined by the empire. All experts would predict a knee slapping laugh at the mere
suggestion that the colonists might win. The colonists themselves knew this to be fact. Their historical records have made it clear that they risked war only because they believed heaven's armies would assist their rightful plight. After the humanly impossible upset, they often spoke of "providence"... "providence"...."providence"!
The miracle had been granted!
The scourge has been the dark souled administrators of so called education whom have you believing secularist, "separation" US founders
It doesn't matter who claims divine intervention on behalf of their side in military engagements. The revolutionaries may have faced like what seemed an overwhelming force, but there is no EVIDENCE of any battle being decided by supernatural forces. There were dozens of other factors at work...the fact that the british were fighting thousands of miles from home, the guerrilla strategies of the colonists, the intervention of foreign powers in this conflict, and so on.
It didn't merely "seem" like an overwhelming force. If the stage were set & nobody knowing what actually occurred, even todays military experts would say the colonists have no chance. You say there's no evidence but its not the fault of reality that the tool called "science", as great as it is, has its limitations. It can only be applied to the natural world. Thus, yours is an error to require scientific, material evidence of something immaterially supernatural. You approach things as if science
were the end all of all. But the reality is that science ends at its own limitations but existent things continue to exist. Its foolish to think in absolute terms of that nothing exists beyond the measuring abilities of a particular construct of man. There are things which exist in this universe for which we have no technology to observe their existence. Yet, through inference its known they exist. There are many discoveries in science which infer the Creators existence. But precisely because
they infer the Creator is exactly the reason why atheists deem it to be unscientific, although its pure science. Therefor, I'll deem the girl who'll beat me up, to be a man because I don't like the implications of the reality. Atheists arrogantly & ignorantly view science to be inherently entwined & even fused with atheism. Ha Ha, nobody fails to acknowledge as much science as do atheists, due to their predetermined beliefs. Apes from mere Ape "likes". Ha Ha Ha, why do logical people laugh?
My statements about the effectiveness of prayer are not "merely subjective opinion". They are the consensus of every scientific field we have. No one has been able to demonstrate definitively that praying for a desired outcome has a measurable effect on the result. This goes for bullets, medicine, climatology, even sports. To pursue this wishful thinking is nothing more than an exercise in self congratulatory narcissism.
You're so full of it. Simply because you incorrectly believe that within all fields of science there are no scientists who dissent from evolution. Even that is blown way out of proportion, not to mention that its the consensus of every scientific field that prayer is completely ineffective. In fact there have been secularist medical doctors whom when after the patient defied all of the doctors prognosis', derived from all he knows, that have scratched their heads & said that they can't attribute
the patients survival to anything of medical science. However, there were many whom were praying for the patient. Often amongst that class of secularists, you will find more honest individuals than Youtubian typist mutant monkeys. Simply the idea of mutant (defects) being the heroically surviving saviors of the species is Ha Ha Ha Ha..Haaaaa aaaahhaaa. Viruses mutate like there's no tomorrow & they're still the same kind. Ha Ha Ha. ooops I said "kind"? Ahh whata-hell, standardize species defin.
I didn't realize this was now about the validity of evolution instead of prayer. Ok then... The number or dissenting scientists is irrelevant because none have been able to present irrefutable proof that the evolutionary model is flat wrong. If you disagree, name one piece of evidence to support your claim. That goes for your claim of a scientific basis of support for prayer. Your example from this last post is simply anecdotal and non-repeatable. For every one "miracle prayer cure" .....
There is little, if anything at all, that you have realized. Although I did allow you to previously meander off course by having replied to your irrelevance. Its time to reel you back in to whats real. "This", was never about the validity of either evolution or prayer. Blunderfool opines that one having views as those of Sara Palin, is unfit for high, public office. Thats the first half of what this is about. The second half is my video response which reveals the blundering foolishness of such
an opinion. For if Blunderfool were correct, then logic would dictate that the very founders of this country would have also been unfit for high, public office. That is as stupid as only a atheist evolutionist can make it. But worry not, for the rest of us are providing the laughter, prompted by the ridiculous absurdities of the Amoebian forebearer's progeny.
Now look here "pyrite secret sapien 13 boy", your horrendous combination of ignorance, incomprehension & delusion of highly intelligent
knowings that is boldly asserted in absolute terms, will certainly lead to yet another round of arrogantly applied, asinine posts. To which I will once again apply a sensible spraying of pesticide. Those future occurrences are obviously foreseeable. However, what I want to know is when will you begin to recognize the presence of your radiantly brilliant, boot beaten, baboon butt? My guess is, you never will. That is the evidence you requested. Also being the reason why evo is "unfalsifiable"
I can point to 10 cases where prayer was absolutely ineffective and the subject died. You make the same logical error as most close-minded theists. "...scratched their heads & said that they can't attribute the patients survival to anything of medical science." You replace the unknown with God. Did this doctor state with medical certainty that prayer cured the patient? Or do you just assume that Goddidit? Your oversimplification of evolution with your last statement are apparent.
I can point to 10 cases of monk brew from which the blood was thinned and the patient prayed for, avoided cardio problems
{Did this doctor state with medical certainty that prayer cured the patient?}
Thats one more example of your possessed, cognitively corrupted thought processes. The Dr. having no other explanation, mentioned the many who prayed bedside, precisely because he had no "medical certainty"
You're making my point for me. You are pointing to an unknown and declaring it God's divine intervention. There is simply no proof of that claim. There is no evidence to support any definitive conclusion. That's why it's an unknown. But just because there is no obvious answer through naturalistic means does not mean that one doesn't exist. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
I recommend the factual, Utoobian Toobster ChiChi series - "Why do morpholobotomized evolutionary mutards laugh within the asylums"? and "150,000,000,000 Foundations Deficient of Structural Integrity As Constructed by Oratorically Gifted, Long Haired Bikers Talking All That Evo Jive Turkey Fallacy".
Though he's also mislead, I at least have respect for AronRa. For he himself will properly reply to ones comments. Rather than Blunderfool's 3 or 4 comments page circling, groupie buzzards.
If not, do the prayers of those who would like to do harm to our troops nullify or override our prayers for their protection? Or are they simply praying to the wrong god and therefore they are wasting their time. How do we know which is the wrong or right god? Each side claims absolute certainty in this matter. And there you have the inherent problem with religion. It is, by definition, a departure from reason for blind faith....faith in that which defies logic.
{Or are they simply praying to the wrong god and therefore they are wasting their time}
Indeed! To this day, even if the ancient Sumerian religious concept of the evolution of organisms were to be the most fervent supplication of the Sumerian fish-hat wearing anti-Christ, oops, I meant "Pope", while he simultaneously lights thousands of Roman Candles to the priceless statue of "St. Simian Selection of the Tree Descention". Still, the Biological natural law of same "kind" descendants will stand
Ah yes, these lovely creationist nuts, I wonder why your channel keeps getting 1 start votes, I mean according to you atheist are all insane and locked in or something, despite the fact that in american prisons atheist make out about 0.025%.
Then you name call some more. Good stuff really. After a while you argue that you are being hunted by atheists. If that is the case why don't you just drive us out? I mean, you are in control of the government, right? This is a Christian nation isn't it? Oh, wait, no it's not. Sorry buddy. Looks like you are stuck with us free thinkers for good. Oh well... In the end you declare victory for yourself, and isn't that what really matters?
Next thunderf00t brings up how a truly religious society breeds nothing but ignorance. You ignore his examples (knowing them to be true I suspect) and do another one of your fantastic quotes. Then you once again do the whole "this is a religious society" kind of deal. Look, if this was a truly religious society, don't you think you would have won Kitzmiller v Dover? Seems that if this was a Christian nation you would have not problem getting your theories taught in school.
Next you again bring up this idea that we live in a "Christian country". True, we live in one that is predominantly Christian country, but that doesn't mean that it is country of Christian doctrine (see article six of the Constitution).
Then you bring up how hospitals in America are supposedly founded primarily by Christians. Any stats to back that up, or did that come directly from your ass? And does your hospital use prayer, or medicine? I mean, prayer is pretty effective but...
I'm going to ignore the arguments of the video. Let me tell you it isn't easy to do so, as you are simply begging to be destroyed.
Instead I would like to address the statement in the box in the beginning. I would like to see some instances of your side being votebotted.
Your comments are thumbed down because you are all repeatedly pwned by scientific knowlege. Your videos can't maintain anything higher than two stars because they are idiotic, and everyone can see it.
You're going to ignore the arguments of the video because it's the only thing you can do to prevent being destroyed.
However, you may as well not ignore them, since you Evoligionists are usually too dumb to even realize when you've been destroyed. Therefor, don't worry, it won't even hurt.
"Being votbotted"? Simply look at the ratings on all the videos on my channel that are relevant to evo. It wasn't a bunch "Votebiologorganisms" that did that. It was Evo "Votebots"
Hahaha you really want me to reply to the arguments?? Alright then.
You say Sarah Palin sounds like James Madison??? Maybe you should see her incredibly articulate responses to questions such as, "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?"
Your argument for what appears to be giving soldiers prayers instead of body armor is beyond absurd. I have many Iraq war vets in my family, and each one will tell you that body armor is far more effective.
{you should see her incredibly articulate responses to questions such as, "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?}
First you arrogantly say "Alright then", as if I'm going to be sorry for having challenged you. Then you write the statement above but it merely displays your deficiency in comprehension. "Palin sounds like Madison" was regarding she & he not being atheists, but both being of the same faith.
Your inability to comprehend correctly leads to your irrelevance which is repeated with -
{Your argument for what appears to be giving soldiers prayers instead of body armor is beyond absurd}
Never did I argue such a thing. Blunderfool's position is that Palin is incompetent for office exclusively because of her personal religious views. My argument is that who is better qualified than those whom have the same views as the founders? Those with views such as Blunderfool's & yours have produced the bloody streets of the French Revolution & the bloodbath of the 20th century's Marxist,
Also, all the vets in my family happen to be both atheist, and democrats. So I guess if I asked them who they would like to have in power, that would be there answer. Not your fanatic right winger candidates what want to ban books and add indoctrination into the school system.
{all the vets in my family happen to be atheist & democrat}
Therefor, if they said the Democraps better serve the welfare of servicemen, they'd be atheist typically lying
You simply can't understand that there being vets in your family & their views is irrelevant since you originally stated that against an argument which I never made. I'm no stranger to having servicemen relatives, 4 Air Force & 2 Army, but their assuredness of that tacos are better than Macaroni & cheese, is also irrelevant.
First, when I originally brought up the vets in my family it was in response to 0:42 where you seem to disagree with thunderf00t on body armor being the most effective way to stop bullets. I think you just feel the need to contradict any thing he says, no matter how absurd you sound.
In your last response you alluded to how my family vets were conservative Christians, which I was correcting.
{you seem to disagree with thunderf00t on body armor being the most effective way to stop bullets}
To many, things are not always what they "seem" to be. However, to the severely "comprehension challenged", mfaulkner12's of the world, things are NEVER as they "seem" to be. Your incomprehension hero, "Blunderf00l", first presented a Strawman by taking Palin's unofficial, private service prayer request and spinning it into an illusion in which she somehow rejects vests, while favoring prayers.
She never mentioned anything regarding issuing vests to US soldiers being that she wasn't speaking to decision makers in Washington. She was speaking to a church congregation. Therefore, appropriately requesting prayers. Blunderf00l's strawman suggests that Christians would therefor incompetently serve in high office. I don't merely disagree with Blunderf00l on this matter. But rather, those kinds of arguments are the reasons why I know he's a Blundering Fool
fanatically Darwinist, materialist psychos. BTW, the 20th century has been recognized as the first ever, truly secular century. Also the deadliest ever, by far. Looks as though "evolved morality" is as much BS as is that heavily mutating viruses which remain viruses are proof of your genealogical heritage having included Amoebians. Your family's vets will also tell you that the atheist, evolutionist Democraps would sooner strip them of vests than provide them with some. Others give vest & prayer
So the two of them are of the same faith? So WHAT? There are smart Christians and there are stupid atheists. Never did I claim that her faith was the SOURCE of her stupidity. Nor did thunderf00t. Had he thought that this was the case he would have added almost all American politicians on his list of idiots. And as for the secular societies being more violent, maybe you should take a look at Europe my man. Lowest violent crime rate, some of the highest atheist/agnostic rates.
{Never did I claim that her faith was the SOURCE of her stupidity. Nor did thunderf00t}
There goes your inability to correctly comprehend, rearing its ugly head again. Ridiculous, considering your first post - "you are simply begging to be destroyed". I never claimed that you said "her faith was the SOURCE of her stupidity". However, Blunderf00l did indeed pre judge her to be incompetent due to her religious beliefs. But now I will say that its obvious you also believe the same as Blunderf00l
I do think you are simply begging to be destroyed. I see now that it would be irrelevant to destroy you. No matter how thorough the destruction, you would still claim victory, as evidence in your video and comments.
You must understand, the complete lack of any remotely competent challenge from atheists, does indeed have that effect upon me. Perhaps, its the atheistically induced boredom?
{I see now that it would be irrelevant to destroy you}
"Irrelevant"? Of course, considering that neither one of us have previously even remotely alluded to anything even merely suggestive of my destruction at your hands.
Perhaps, a unintended destruction by incomprehension?
Alright then. Why don't we let voters decide who was destroyed? Oh darn, only one and a half stars. Well I'll tell you what. When I die and stand before Yahweh on my day of judgment you can laugh as I am being thrown into hell.
It doesn't matter at all because I think I have finally realized that this channel is satire. If I'm correct, I would suggest you tone it down a bit. You are making yourself look like the real thing.
You then proceed to try and say in a pseudo-articulate manner that Sarah Palin could never muster that uniforms don't really work: look at the red coats!
Then you make that classic "we were founded on Christianity" arguments that your side loves so much. This country was founded by Christians but on ENLIGHTENMENT IDEALS. Ideals put forth by such atheists as Thomas Paine.
The next "argument" you make is to simply dismiss his statement with sarcasm and alliteration because you are SOOO clever.
{You then proceed to try and say in a pseudo-articulate manner that Sarah Palin could never muster that uniforms don't really work: look at the red coats}
I believe you may have indeed aced me this time. Considering that I certainly can't return the attributional favor by proposing that yours is a "pseudo"-inarticulate manner. No Sir, you r indeed the real McCoy. A true epitome of authenticity. For example, take your highly encrypted, secret message from above. Only u hold the key
Then you play a cute little quote by Tomas Paine, who was a known atheist, just look at ANY other quote. In fact, I'm wondering if you can send me the resource you got that quote from?
Next you play Thunderf00t's rant and then say, "oh we have no problem with REAL science" Real science of course being anything that doesn't interrupt your dogma.
Feel free to respond but I have a life I must go have and will finish this later.
Isn't it "cute"? Cute is why I "played" it. I feel the quote was necessary for the founding of our cute little country.
National resources are a bit difficult to send within a "resource transport" deficient, YouTube comment. However, I'd be more than happy, in fact, I'd be absolutely elated to direct you to the evidential source of the Painefully faithful quote. Its likely you'll find the original document, well guarded within the Library of Congress. Or maybe on Google search
Oh, and you should really come up with something better than these arguments from authority. It really doesn't matter if the founding fathers were Christians or Scientologists, people like PCS and Sarah Palin are products of our failing education system.... I hope... for the gene pool's sake.
{people like PCS & Sarah Palin r products of failing education system}
Perhaps they should have attended Christian, private schools? They always annihilate the public schools with their "product's" comparative test scores
You do realize don't you, that the "failing, public edu. system" is one under the complete control of atheist, evolutionist, "Ape-like thinkers". BTW, did you vote for the Marxist guy from Chicago? Public schools = no tuition, bus rides, books & lunch provided. Who'd u think?
"Perhaps they should have attended Christian, private schools? They always annihilate the public schools with their "product's" comparative test scores"
Correction, PRIVATE schools are are the ones with superior test scores, this includes most private Christian schools. To think the "Christianity" of these schools is what drives their success is intellectually dishonest. Private education provides a much better environment for learning. That's a statistical fact.
"Perhaps they should have attended Christian, private schools? They always annihilate the public schools with their "product's" comparative test scores"
"Christian, private schools"
Saying "private, Christian" schools would be more accurate. It's a statistical fact that privatized education provides a better environment for learning and therefore better test scores. To say that the "Christianity" of a school is responsible for this is intellectually dishonest.
"You do realize don't you, that the "failing, public edu. system" is one under the complete control of atheist, evolutionist, "Ape-like thinkers"
Um. No? It's under control of the state governments, and government is really really REALLY good at fucking things up. I'd like to see a statistic from a credible source that shows that most people working in government are "atheist, evolutionists".
And no, I didn't vote for Obama. I found it funny that you assumed I did, though.
"Like it or not, and depsite the fallacious revisionists, you live in a country with a monumental legacy of having been founded upon the God of the Bible's principles"
No. We live in a country that was founded upon principles that are also in the Bible, and a variety of other holy books. That's why stealing, which happens to be a big "no-no" in the Bible and every other holy book is a law, while adultery another "no-no" in the Bible and other holy books isn't.
do you really think christianity is why the US is the way it is? many of the founding fathers wouldnt even be considered theists muchj less "christian" by your standards.
But forget all the appeals to authority. Our government is most certainly a secular one. Religion has thrived divorced from the state throughout history, driven by a couple religous revivals.
You've missed the point. Blunderfool, was claiming that Palin was not qualified simply because of her personal beliefs. He made the "strawman" argument in using, not a official, but a personal, church video, to claim that Palins official policies would be to pray only. If such a deceptively weak argument needs to be made, its only because he had an extremely weak & incorrect view to begin with. My inclusion of the Franklin quote was simply to show that he also made similar unofficial statements
also 'this country' by which i assume you mean america was founded on the seperation of church and state because the founding fathers new the profound negative affects religion would have.
This country, by which indeed I do mean America, was founded upon Biblical principles. However, the foundation of your misunderstanding, was laid by the revisionists of unscrupulously, shameless, dastardly character. It's why they're subversive, Marxists. Whom when not replacing facts with BS, they're playing with their dolls. Also under the cover of darkness. Their Professor Propaganda Puppet & their moronic media meatheads, have long flooded your ears with the mere excerpt from a private
Since I have already explained from where that "unamended", "unofficial" & "non legal" phrase came. It's surely a waste of time to even try to reason-roto clear your constipated cognition. Considering that you read my previously posted mention of it, is why its clear that you simply can't handle having your comfy, little, baby bubble of preferential ape, false reality burst.
Yes, yes, we hear you, loud and in upper case bold type. There, there, now, settle down. Here...baba. Rocka my ba.......
letter, "separation of church & state". Those bigoted bunch of hypocritical haters have intentionally used that non legal "phrase" because they've gotten away with applying it universally. They made certain to never utter the actual Constitutional amendment - "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, nor prohibit the practice thereof". Thats because it addresses only "congress". So tell me, isn't their bigoted hatred quite obvious when even school districts are forced
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, nor prohibit the practice thereof" - if i understand your country correctly then there is not just freedom of religion, but also freedom FROM religion, hence the separation of church and state.
the values and principles associated with any religion are hardly unique to it. the point is to prevent scripture from influencing law.
(the point is to prevent scripture from influencing law)
There's a reason why many courtrooms used to have the Ten Commandments on the wall, prior to the current Jackass era. Its because not only this country's, but most of western civilization's laws were derived from those
Of course, that was prior to the current day of super simianite secular soundness. Its been demanded by the ACLU that "The Ten" be taken down. Right about the time when they argued Americans right to have sex with children
Ok, do some research please before you make assumptions. I will grant you that most civilizations have used "The Ten" as a moral guideline, but as for our laws and the Constitution, they are not solely derived from "The Ten". A HUGE chunk of our laws are derived from the Magna Carte and English Common Law. And the Magna Carte didnt deal with "The Ten", it dealt with the King granting certain freedoms to the Church. So, please research before showing your ignorance. I mean no disrespect.
Guess what? The Constitution was derived from the men of the Constitutional Convention. Those were pretty much the same men that during the Revolutionary War, were nicknamed "The Bible Congress".
Guess why they were named as such? Do the research!
So if you happen to know anyone whom happens to be a card carrying, money contributing, supportive patron of the "Animalized Child Loving Utopianites" (ACLU). Then give them the highly rectally rectory recommended 2 for 1 membership deal of putting a few bucks in the Roman baskets also.
Hey, its the New-American way! How else can the analogously similar, institutional pillars of society continue to operate? As the Presidential Puppet Mongrel Mutt said, "Thank You Sodoman"
to prohibit "one nation under God" from being said? Federal Gov. has violated the Constitution simply by overstepping their limited powers by having control over education. Not to mention many other things. Worse yet, though the 1st was intended to restrict Congress from forcing subscription to the "church of Marx". So that the people can be free to establish as much religion as they wish. The Feds have violated that also. Take a look at the ceremonial service performed by President Perfunctory
"to prohibit "one nation under God" from being said? Federal Gov. has violated the Constitution simply by overstepping their limited powers" - freedom from religion.
You ought to stop stuffing yourself with gluttonous amounts of freedom from whats not even oppressing you. Trust me, if you simply give it a try, you're going to love the taste of freedom from delusion.
Preacher on the backwards thanksgiving day. His perfunctory mentor, Wrongful Wright, preached the "Damning of America". Indeed, the pupil is delivering the hand-baskets by the bunches.
The "interpretors", intended to possess the least power, have been playing "Black Dress Barbie" with a wooden toy hammer & ruling that "the people" must be punished for not agreeing to have their religion dictated to them so as to include ceremonial marriages of abomination. Though time after time, they've been
granted everything previously asked for. Still, with hatred, the abominable tyrants antagonistically push the issue. They knowing where their friends are seated as violating legislators, rather than the interpretors they're supposed to be. There may be those whom opine differently, but the 1st is clear. The intentions of both the 1st & 2nd parts of it are so that the peoples religions are neither prohibited, nor dictated to them. Punishment is tantamount to dictating details of its practice.
{"our prayers sir were heard..." - and the prayers of the British presumably asking for the same thing?}
The problem with your thinking lay in the "presumption". Ones prayers, should be presumed to be in accordance with God's will. If both sides were praying the same thing, then there wouldn't be a conflict, now would there? Of course not.
After the conflict ended, one side went on to often speak of "providence", the other did not. Your assignment is to discover of it.
"Ones prayers, should be presumed to be in accordance with God's will." - if there is a god then he doesnt give a rats about humanity.
"After the conflict ended, one side went on to often speak of "providence", the other did not. Your assignment is to discover of it." - and if the other side had one they may very well have claimed the same thing, does not make it true.
Considering that you're crude attempt to speak against "what are" facts of history (often speak of "providence"), with mere "ifs". Doesn't change the fact that the "other side" simply didn't claim such things. After having clearly lost, why would anyone say such things?
"The mind is a terrible thing to waste"......... on falsehood of evolution!
Yet another Evotardically told & epically pathetic, typical, Simianite Dufus' enigmatically emanated enema animation of a diarrhetically defecated, dummies dictated story
An astronomically asinine ASSertion with aspiring insertions of an ASSumed superior, primate's posteriorly produced & preposterously postulated poo-poo propaganda
It's a sad day when a candidate of Palin's calibre is excluded from office simply because of a slight lack of foreign policy experience, whacky religious views, an inability to present herself intelligently, and no prior experience of anything remotely near the scale of the position she may have ended up in.
"SepticHoleBleacher" of the Pretty in Pink Primate Pooters Political Party. It's an even sadder day when your pseudo science friendly, perfunctory president "Bigrack Yomomma" puts us even deeper in the hole by $1 Trillion in just that 1 sadder day. Merely to stimulate the Pretty in Pinks of the presidential pooter puckering party primates whom so enthusiastically smooch smacked his spectacularly sparkling simian sphincter. What a bunch of crimson clad, rouge rash, brilliant baboon butt boneheads
Don't cry simply because you lost. Eventually you'll learn that arguing on behalf of things false, is why you lose. Then you won't have to cry any more
First you bunch of cranially cavernous, cognitively cretinous clowns tried to elect the Boston Butler - "Lurch" and his nuptial "Cousin It" with her wild n wooly witchy hair and their "Heinz 57 sauce.
But then, you bunch of preposterously propagating, primitively pre-mature primates did indeed socialist-selfishly succeed in bringing us the crazily crafty, candidate's campaign of the hallucinating "High 57 states"
F$#k the Queen, she's there merely for posterity anyway. God save America!
"You" haven't a clue of what TFoot was talking about. He was saying that Sara Palin is not competent for high office specifically because of her personal religious convictions. Considering how and by whom this country was founded, this country is the one in all the world in which TFoot's view is the most ridiculous
The quotes in my video which are only a few from the total that exist, demonstrate exactly why TFoot's view is so ridiculous
Communist countries have historically been materialists
& fanatical Darwinists, hostile to Christianity. As well as unjustly authoritarian, as are the EXPELLERS! TFoot and the other Athevolutionists like himself would be warmly welcomed there. Harmoniously devolving and self deprecating into apehood. Side by side, within a speciated population along with their Comrades!
TFoot has still retained the vestigial facial ape fur, high up to his cheekbones from the last time when his species were "ape-like creatures"
This doesn't disprove evolution or tf00t. If you don't 'believe' in the proven fact of evolution, that's your problem. And you still haven't answered my question. Your arguments are a mash of utter gibberish. You have not given me one shred of evidence that tf00t is wrong about anything by using any means of logic of reasoning or anything us civilized people listen to.
If you want me to give you "evidence" by using "logic" & "reasoning", then I would actually have to give you predetermined theoretic explanation, corrupted by plenty of completely unreasonable illogic. Then you would promptly reject what is actually your own manner of thinking. Simply because you'd know it came from a Creationist & because you're too retarded to recognize it as your own.
Prime example - "This doesn't disprove evolution"
Tfool wasn't even arguing evo in his videos which are in
this video. Therefor, I wasn't even attempting to disprove evo in this video. That wasn't the "TOPIC"!
You are as cretinous as it gets. You've seen Tfoot's videos that are in this one. You've seen this video. Also, in my last reply I even explained what he was talking about. Yet, despite all that, you're still too much of a short, yellow bus, front seat, football helmeted, primate passenger to be capable of understanding whats really going on!
Sane people understand that to merely assert things like "you speak gibberish", is due to one of two things. Either ignorance or ingrownuts are keeping you from actually presenting an argument which addresses at least 1 of the many points which I presented.
I believe your problem is a acute combination of the two. Then, there's the problem of your madness. Where do you live, in the stone age? Get up to speed, everyone knows meds make you mad, then you die.......soon! Insane suggestion!
See that? That's the kind of disaster that occurs whenever a Athevolutionist "thinks". Next time try to remember that your forbearing ancestors were brainless amoebas and organisms can only pass on the genetics which they possess. That explains the disaster.
As for your incredible ignorance of American history, how could America have become "such a strong country" from a mere excerpt within the private letter of one individual? Or are you one of the many
brains? But I must admit, if there is anything from Athevolutionists that comes close to convincing me of evolution, its their claim of having brainless forbearers that have passed their genes to the Evoists. It has darn near made me a believer & still challenges my reasoned thoughts that are based on scientific empiricism. Which incidentally, is harmonious with the Biblical account of origins. After 5000 yrs. of recorded history, still, man has only observed the reproduction of the same "kind"!
No! This is what you call infusing the truth with mocking Blunderfool.
Athevolutionists mock & ridicule much and its pathetic because they're wrong on the origins issue. I'll tell you what is truly just begging to be ridiculed. It's the claim of that your genealogical heritage includes Amoebian forbearers. Ha Ha, thats as cretinous as it gets. It defies science from which we know that organisms can only pass on the genetics which they possess. How can a brainless amoeba have descendants with
Oh yeah, certainly, and a one word argument that supports your belief in the 5,000 year old, primitive, Sumerian religion of evolution is always a raging "success"!
"YipesNow90210", you epitomize the typical, cognitively constipated, cretinously cock-eyed clownvolutionist
You're simply too stupid to realize that you came to "my" video and actually told me to get lost from my own video
If I were ever evolutionarily stupid enough to waste my time by even clicking on one of your worthless video cartoon commercials made for the neurologically neutered, morpholobotomized mutards. Then, u can tell me to get lost. Until then, go pull off your butt cheek beanie!
the speration of church & state is what made America such a strong country and now your just about to gleefully advocating to throw it all out the window..
sheeple goats that believes that "separation of church & state" is actually within the Constitution? Ha Ha, what a fool. The Marxist people whom have by design, caused u to think with a cavernous cranial cavity, are the same Federal, treasonous, CFR criminals that have brainwashed people with "separation". Guess why they peddled "separation" so much? Because the 1st amendment - "congress shall make no law respecting religion" - is specifically restricted to "CONGRESS" you moronic mental failure
Ho boy! Finally know my posts are getting up there and no I ain't gonna say "praised be Jayzus!"
@Thunderf00t. Rock on brother. Much love and respect from this recovering Catholic and newly blossomed free thinking naturalistic humanist,Theres a beautiful world out there we need to share with each other as best we can in the brief time we have.All the very very best for you and yours Thunderf00t and may your meme propagate bountifully/exponentially/beautifully.................jus' go brother.
What's the "969" for? Were you born in 69 as I was? You, perhaps on a 9th day of a month? Mine looks like this "1369"
Also, did you know that by posting paradoxically perplexed, perfunctory primate praises to Blunderfool on my video that now you're messing with the wrong......."Holy Rock & Roller1369"?
How do you figure that you're "recovering"?
You merely went from Inquisitive Evo-Ape to Incredulous Evo-Ape. But probably devolved to abortionist
I like how the Israelis do it. They pray to Yahweh asking Him to kick Muslim ass, then jump in their Merkava tanks and F-15s and give the Big Guy all the help He needs in kicking Muslim ass, then roll home and thank Him for letting them help Him kick Muslim ass.
Listen to this cretinous constipation of cranial cognition. "only 4 minutes" because the 1st grade finger painting was too "fundy"mental for his profoundly paradoxical, computationally confounding, nourished neurological nobility of intergalactic intelligence. Yet, you ask "Pseudo science"? Perhaps singlehandedly engineering the latest space shuttle has overqualified you too much to recognize that the focus of my video isn't a scientific one? Nor was it intended to be. Dream? Forbearer Amoebas?
If simply being a Non-Christian is a crime that warrants infinite punishment, then I have 4.6 billion friends I'd like you to meet. Hey! That's like one friend for every year that the planet Earth has existed. Fancy that!
How is any of what you said, relevant to the information in my video?
This video requires greater than ape intelligence to understand. Therefor, in case you watch it innumerable times and still can't figure it out. It's implications are regarding political issues and religion opposed, social injustice
Buddy, I am very much an agnostic. My position is very reasonable.
Did Evolution occur? Yes.
Does that mean that there's no God? No.
But does that mean that all 6.6 billion people on the planet have to assimilate into the Oh-So-Perfect Culture of Christianity lest they face an infinite punishment for their finite wrongdoings? Give me a break.
You may perceive your position as reasonable. However, to simply assert that evolution, or anything else for that matter, is factual or valid, without presenting a supportive argument, is the most unreasonable of things
It indicates that from a lack of proper reasoning, you expect that your unexplained, unsupported view should be considered authoritatively valid.
Nothing of what I said in the video implies that people "have to assimilate". Due to incomprehension, you turn the tables.
The video addresses the fact that Blunderful is discriminatingly opposed to people based entirely on their religious views. Only for that reason, he deemed Sara Palin to be incompetent. My video illustrates that her religious subscriptions are exactly as were those of the US founders. If incompetence was derived purely from those views, then the War of Independence would have never been won. Much less would the country have been founded. You don't know this, but currently & since long ago, there
exist powerful people whom seek to rob us of the Constitution and thus, of our country itself. You may think thats silly? The capitalist system and banking enabled them to become the wealthiest in the world. But since through capitalism fortunes are made and fortunes are lost because its fair. It no longer suits them. They prefer authoritarianism, by which they can remain the wealthiest indefinitely. They "do" know that this country and its tyranny preventing constitution was founded by exactly
what the founders quotes in my video say. It's the reason why it's precisely they who have been & still are behind the revised early US history that many have been taught. Their power, not scientists has pushed evolution, homosexuality, misandrist feminism, anti-patriotism, anti-nationalism, multiculturalism without Americanization. Think thats silly? Take notice of the common thread between all those I have named. All are hostile to Christianity. Not by coincidence, by manipulative design
(lest they face an infinite punishment for their finite wrongdoings? Give me a break)
1 break, coming up. A break from unknowing is required. I doubt that you're opposed to the concept of law & order - crime & punishment. Legislation informs you of what you ought not do. Generally, if you follow the rules, there is reward. Not only do you retain your freedom, but may live with peace of mind and an opportunity to prosper. If you do what you ought not, there's punishment. It's the same concept.
And failure to assimilated into the Oh-So-Perfect culture of Christianity is considered a wrongdoing to your way of thinking. Well I'm sorry, but that doesn't make sense.
Evolution is a recognizable fact that even the ancient greeks identified. What you seem to be confused on, is Darwin's explanation of evolution which is natural selection.
Stop dogmatically refusing to "believe" in evolution and start coming up with your own theory as to why species on earth evolve.
You actually tell me to "think for myself"? Ha Ha, and what do you suggest, that I take a Q from you? Ha Ha Ha, you don't even know the cretinous construction of your own thoughts.
Listen to yourself - "Stop dogmatically refusing to "believe" in evolution and start coming up with your own theory as to why species on earth evolve"
Thats telling me to believe in evo (species evolving) & yet, still telling me to come up with my own theory of why species evolve???
Therefor, using a complete non issue in a invalid argument which actually only attacked Sarah Palin's "personal" religious beliefs, is ad hominem. Especially when recognizing that Blunderfool's argument is severely foolishly flawed. As if the Democrats would truly make military expenditures in buying bullet proof vests. If anyone would, it would have been McCain/Palin. She might have personally handed out a few along with saying that they're in her prayers. From Dems get - 0 vests & 0 prayers
You've the audacity to utter the words "ad hominem"? You haven't the ability to recognize it even when it's covering the entire screen. (look again 4:54 - 5:00)
Not to mention that since my video directly addresses & wipes its booty with several of Blunderfools fallacious assertions. That its why your "Look up ad hominem" comment, is in itself ad hominem. Look it up - It's when Blunderfool manufactures a stuttering Sara Palin. Bullet proof vests were not a political issue during pres. elections
WOW! Its truly incredible to witness the degree to which Sickular Simianists can be so dogmatically blinded to the 3 pink elephants within their VW Beetle. My video begins with a clip from the beginning of Blunderfool's video. Which contains heavily edited, "I believe" spoken repetition. This is intended to be another supposed demonstration of her supposed stupidity. A manipulative tactic that works on stupid people such as yourself, simply because your "illogic" dictates that she's accurately
depicted because its a fact that she's stupid. Its the same dog, excuse me mate, Dingo tail chasing, circular reasoning that tells evolutionists that if evo theory were valid then it would be supported by the existence of transitional species. However, the evidential transitionals are claimed to be us and all living organisms because evolution is valid. How's that for a real gem of Evomisogynist's monopoly on logic. If you desire some more requirement for posterior stitching, you've come to the
right place. Many evoists require that you comply with their rules of basically endorsing the delusion of evo's validity before you can debate against evo on their videos. That Logic Meister maneuver aside, I'm going to require that Amoebian Simianites first read all the fantastic ass-rippings that I've already issued, before they bring their asses of aspirational Baboon configurations. I've grown tired of so many grown, princess, ape-men-creatures ending up crying me sobbing sad songs, speaking
of newly reconfigured, dearly departed, crimson clad, Baboon booties. My truly correct logic is as follows - Blunderfool says that Sara Palin would have been the worst possible selection for high office. This, he bases entirely upon her religious beliefs. My video is to demonstrate that of all the candidates for pres. & vice, her world & life view is the most like that of the country's founders. If you wish to reply with having me hear the humanists predetermined revisionist account, I already
have. Their historup story told at todays university institutions of higher degrees of moronically meted mumblings from the perfunctory "Professor Profusely Propagating", whom indelicately indoctrinates with the highest intellectual virtues of gender, race, social class, homosexuality & a splash of honorary, terrorist group member, speakers. That hissingstory is unharmonious with the 18th century, American colonial panorama that was strewn with little white buildings with tall steeples
Here's some quotes from Benjamin Franklin not taken out of context...
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Poor Richard's Almanack, 1758
"Lighthouses are more helpful than churches."
"He (the Rev. Mr. Whitefield) used, indeed, sometimes to pray for my conversion, but never had the satisfaction of believing that his prayers were heard." Franklin's Autobiography
"In the affairs of the world, men are saved, not by faith, but by the want of it."
By the way,the stratocaster is an example of human creativity at its best.Maketing and selling it's corperate cloned 'planks' for nearly £700 is an example of why capitalism realy sucks as the the strat is very low tech and probably costs less than £40 to produce.
Manufacturing and selling the Stratocaster was something possible for one guy to do simply because that is exactly what the whole idea was for having a capitalist system. The capitalist system is precisely why it even happened. The ironic thing about that story, in light of your willful ignorance, is that its one of those stories that most epitomizes capitalism in action. Which in turn, produces the undeniably evidential, stone engraved fact that yours epitomizes "willful ignorance".
so...who has saved this 'capitalist 'system then?You must have been asleep for the last couple of months.how ignorant,or perhaps deluded would be more apt?
An ignorantly sleepy delusion is what is conducive of a view that thinks the capitalist system is being "saved" every time that the ultra rich are insured
hmmm... another smear tactic video with no proof. If quotes from people BEFORE evolution was widely known are the cornerstones for your"argument"... then you sir, have no argument.
TheNomad1970 1 year ago
@TheNomad1970
You have no argument. The relevant matter is not science, its politics. Blunderf00l was saying that Christians are not fit for office, simply for being Christians. But this video shows the evidence of that Christians are precisely who founded the country. The smearing was done by Blunderf00l
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
I'm just wondering, what do you hope to achieve with this?
Londron 1 year ago
@Londron
The video shows that the kind of people whom Blunderf00l & most atheists believe to be unfit for high office, are actually the same kind of people as those who founded the country
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
First of all, sentence construction please. Freaking hard to decipher.
I think you say the founders of 'the country" whatever that country me be. But I guess as only Americans would assume it's all about them it's the US you're talking about.
a) None of them was a Christian, not a single one of them
b) even if they were, that was before we knew were we came from, how we got here, hell it was in a time leechcures were high tech.
Londron 1 year ago
@Londron
{I think you say the founders of 'the country" whatever that country may be}
I'm still torn between Evolutionists & Homosexuals, regarding which are more delusional??? You made that comment & yet, you think yourself the intelligent one? This video was a response to Blunderf00l's video which he produced specifically in regards to the Presidential elections campaign season which was occuring at the time. Therefor, yes, it is America that is being refered to...
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Indeed, the Presidential elections were "all about us"... or does Britain have a President also?
{None of them was a Christian, not a single one of them}
Oh WOW, Evolutionists are so intelligent that even a Belgian one is going to correct me on my own country's history. BTW, did you know Belgians first brewed beer in Europe after learning of it from ancient Egyptian records?
Check out this nifty little "critical thinking" trick. In America, even atheists admit that during the founding era,
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
most of the general population was Christian. The lack of Hindu, Buddist, Muslim & Satanic buildings of worship... along with the New England landscape being dotted with red brick or white painted buildings with a tall white steeple, makes that fact quite undeniable. Thus, now we'll brilliantly believe that the people combed their state populations to find the tiny handful of non Christians from amongst them & send them off to "REPRESENT" them while founding a "REPRESENTATIVE" form of government
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Pass me the red phone... yes, patch me through to NORAD... yes Commander Comrad Commodore... take us to defcon 1... indeed, its that critical... yes, the Evolutionists have been thinking critically again. I know, it happens every time... defcon 1 please. I'll inform you when their Ape-Like creature brains, inhereted from ancestral bacterial forebears have been morpholobotomized further into Mutard status. The what?... The battle cry of the Revolution? "rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God"
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
omg you are quite clearly bat crazy
123columbo123 1 year ago
I think Dr. Suess has been "reincarnated" as a complete moron.
Dweab 2 years ago
I stopped at 1:23. So...because we won the Revolutionary War, that means that our prayers were answered? "God" let it be so? If you are really able to convince yourself of that, then you're welcome.
GrimmReeferX 2 years ago
You poor, strange, deluded man...
moekelok 2 years ago
Did I miss the part where it is proven that prayer stops bullets more effectively than Kevlar? Tf00t had an actual demonstration of an actual gun firing at an actual vest. Where is the demonstration of an actual gun being fired at an actual praying man? If you want to play in the realm of science you need hard evidence, not centuries old out-of-context quotes.
pyrite13 2 years ago
You missed the part between the left & the right ears. Thats why when you stand in a cross wind, you get that loud whistling sound effect. With a bit of well practiced facial orifice control, that cavernously configured, cranial cavity might yet be salvageable if it were ever to belt out a few measures of "Yankee Doodle Dandy Daddies" went to town when they put the redcoats on the ground. Then the King Most Ding-A-Ling knew they weren't mess'n around
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
A half-assed insult (I assume that's what you were going for with that incoherent babble) is not proof.
pyrite13 2 years ago
Personally, I thought it was quite fantastic.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
How do you figure that you even have an argument? Let me guess, the Democrats are completely beside themselves, strung out on high tension G-Strings, anxious to bend over......backwards to help & provide greatly for the US military?
Hey realm reamed, welcome to the Ape Hunters playground. You have mutard meandered into MY realm. If the US military were ever to get vests, then you'll definitely be sport'n a well reamed realm gleam if you're putting your money on the Democraps to be giving em
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
My argument is that prayer does absolutely no good on the battlefield. Offering prayers to our troops is just a bit more useful than offering farts. The rest of your post is more incoherent babble.
pyrite13 2 years ago
Palin asked the congregation for prayers. But for vests, she would have asked Congress. Its simply a matter of knowing appropriateness.
However, you go right ahead and keep Lemming following the Blunderful one
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
It doesn't matter who she asks for prayers. THEY DO NO GOOD!! Praying, wishing, and hoping for something are the least effective means to achieving a goal. Demonstrate otherwise or go away.
pyrite13 2 years ago
Your argument is your merely subjective opinion of prayer. The founders of this country obviously had a opinion far different to yours. Carefully read the quote at 1:17 - 1:44. I'm certain you need comprehension assistance. He said that every sensible, defensive measure will be taken (that would represent inclusion of vests) However, they would not be 100% reliant upon mans own abilities. Mans fullest contributions would be employed only after recognizing & revering God as the highest Commander
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
whom if he chooses, may determine outcomes. "Without his whole blessing, even the best of human counsels (we'll overratingly attribute those substantially lesser counsels to Blunderfool) are but foolishness".(Hancock seemed to have psychically known of Blundy)
If the stage were set for war between the most powerful empire on the globe & some colonist "subjects" of whom many of their circumstances had been determined by the empire. All experts would predict a knee slapping laugh at the mere
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
suggestion that the colonists might win. The colonists themselves knew this to be fact. Their historical records have made it clear that they risked war only because they believed heaven's armies would assist their rightful plight. After the humanly impossible upset, they often spoke of "providence"... "providence"...."providence"!
The miracle had been granted!
The scourge has been the dark souled administrators of so called education whom have you believing secularist, "separation" US founders
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
It doesn't matter who claims divine intervention on behalf of their side in military engagements. The revolutionaries may have faced like what seemed an overwhelming force, but there is no EVIDENCE of any battle being decided by supernatural forces. There were dozens of other factors at work...the fact that the british were fighting thousands of miles from home, the guerrilla strategies of the colonists, the intervention of foreign powers in this conflict, and so on.
pyrite13 2 years ago
It didn't merely "seem" like an overwhelming force. If the stage were set & nobody knowing what actually occurred, even todays military experts would say the colonists have no chance. You say there's no evidence but its not the fault of reality that the tool called "science", as great as it is, has its limitations. It can only be applied to the natural world. Thus, yours is an error to require scientific, material evidence of something immaterially supernatural. You approach things as if science
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
were the end all of all. But the reality is that science ends at its own limitations but existent things continue to exist. Its foolish to think in absolute terms of that nothing exists beyond the measuring abilities of a particular construct of man. There are things which exist in this universe for which we have no technology to observe their existence. Yet, through inference its known they exist. There are many discoveries in science which infer the Creators existence. But precisely because
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
they infer the Creator is exactly the reason why atheists deem it to be unscientific, although its pure science. Therefor, I'll deem the girl who'll beat me up, to be a man because I don't like the implications of the reality. Atheists arrogantly & ignorantly view science to be inherently entwined & even fused with atheism. Ha Ha, nobody fails to acknowledge as much science as do atheists, due to their predetermined beliefs. Apes from mere Ape "likes". Ha Ha Ha, why do logical people laugh?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
My statements about the effectiveness of prayer are not "merely subjective opinion". They are the consensus of every scientific field we have. No one has been able to demonstrate definitively that praying for a desired outcome has a measurable effect on the result. This goes for bullets, medicine, climatology, even sports. To pursue this wishful thinking is nothing more than an exercise in self congratulatory narcissism.
pyrite13 2 years ago
You're so full of it. Simply because you incorrectly believe that within all fields of science there are no scientists who dissent from evolution. Even that is blown way out of proportion, not to mention that its the consensus of every scientific field that prayer is completely ineffective. In fact there have been secularist medical doctors whom when after the patient defied all of the doctors prognosis', derived from all he knows, that have scratched their heads & said that they can't attribute
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
the patients survival to anything of medical science. However, there were many whom were praying for the patient. Often amongst that class of secularists, you will find more honest individuals than Youtubian typist mutant monkeys. Simply the idea of mutant (defects) being the heroically surviving saviors of the species is Ha Ha Ha Ha..Haaaaa aaaahhaaa. Viruses mutate like there's no tomorrow & they're still the same kind. Ha Ha Ha. ooops I said "kind"? Ahh whata-hell, standardize species defin.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I didn't realize this was now about the validity of evolution instead of prayer. Ok then... The number or dissenting scientists is irrelevant because none have been able to present irrefutable proof that the evolutionary model is flat wrong. If you disagree, name one piece of evidence to support your claim. That goes for your claim of a scientific basis of support for prayer. Your example from this last post is simply anecdotal and non-repeatable. For every one "miracle prayer cure" .....
pyrite13 2 years ago
There is little, if anything at all, that you have realized. Although I did allow you to previously meander off course by having replied to your irrelevance. Its time to reel you back in to whats real. "This", was never about the validity of either evolution or prayer. Blunderfool opines that one having views as those of Sara Palin, is unfit for high, public office. Thats the first half of what this is about. The second half is my video response which reveals the blundering foolishness of such
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
an opinion. For if Blunderfool were correct, then logic would dictate that the very founders of this country would have also been unfit for high, public office. That is as stupid as only a atheist evolutionist can make it. But worry not, for the rest of us are providing the laughter, prompted by the ridiculous absurdities of the Amoebian forebearer's progeny.
Now look here "pyrite secret sapien 13 boy", your horrendous combination of ignorance, incomprehension & delusion of highly intelligent
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
knowings that is boldly asserted in absolute terms, will certainly lead to yet another round of arrogantly applied, asinine posts. To which I will once again apply a sensible spraying of pesticide. Those future occurrences are obviously foreseeable. However, what I want to know is when will you begin to recognize the presence of your radiantly brilliant, boot beaten, baboon butt? My guess is, you never will. That is the evidence you requested. Also being the reason why evo is "unfalsifiable"
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I can point to 10 cases where prayer was absolutely ineffective and the subject died. You make the same logical error as most close-minded theists. "...scratched their heads & said that they can't attribute the patients survival to anything of medical science." You replace the unknown with God. Did this doctor state with medical certainty that prayer cured the patient? Or do you just assume that Goddidit? Your oversimplification of evolution with your last statement are apparent.
pyrite13 2 years ago
I can point to 10 cases of monk brew from which the blood was thinned and the patient prayed for, avoided cardio problems
{Did this doctor state with medical certainty that prayer cured the patient?}
Thats one more example of your possessed, cognitively corrupted thought processes. The Dr. having no other explanation, mentioned the many who prayed bedside, precisely because he had no "medical certainty"
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
You're making my point for me. You are pointing to an unknown and declaring it God's divine intervention. There is simply no proof of that claim. There is no evidence to support any definitive conclusion. That's why it's an unknown. But just because there is no obvious answer through naturalistic means does not mean that one doesn't exist. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
pyrite13 2 years ago
Yup,and ridiculous claims require ridicule.
The stoopid is strong with chuichupachichi isnt it?
Rockster969 2 years ago
I recommend the YouTube series "Why do people laugh at creationists" and "15 Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism" for an in-depth education.
pyrite13 2 years ago
I recommend the factual, Utoobian Toobster ChiChi series - "Why do morpholobotomized evolutionary mutards laugh within the asylums"? and "150,000,000,000 Foundations Deficient of Structural Integrity As Constructed by Oratorically Gifted, Long Haired Bikers Talking All That Evo Jive Turkey Fallacy".
Though he's also mislead, I at least have respect for AronRa. For he himself will properly reply to ones comments. Rather than Blunderfool's 3 or 4 comments page circling, groupie buzzards.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
When you can't counter with facts you fall back to ad hominem attacks? How very noble.
pyrite13 2 years ago
If not, do the prayers of those who would like to do harm to our troops nullify or override our prayers for their protection? Or are they simply praying to the wrong god and therefore they are wasting their time. How do we know which is the wrong or right god? Each side claims absolute certainty in this matter. And there you have the inherent problem with religion. It is, by definition, a departure from reason for blind faith....faith in that which defies logic.
pyrite13 2 years ago
{Or are they simply praying to the wrong god and therefore they are wasting their time}
Indeed! To this day, even if the ancient Sumerian religious concept of the evolution of organisms were to be the most fervent supplication of the Sumerian fish-hat wearing anti-Christ, oops, I meant "Pope", while he simultaneously lights thousands of Roman Candles to the priceless statue of "St. Simian Selection of the Tree Descention". Still, the Biological natural law of same "kind" descendants will stand
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
ignorant fucker
tonymag28 2 years ago
Ah yes, these lovely creationist nuts, I wonder why your channel keeps getting 1 start votes, I mean according to you atheist are all insane and locked in or something, despite the fact that in american prisons atheist make out about 0.025%.
medallish 2 years ago
Then you name call some more. Good stuff really. After a while you argue that you are being hunted by atheists. If that is the case why don't you just drive us out? I mean, you are in control of the government, right? This is a Christian nation isn't it? Oh, wait, no it's not. Sorry buddy. Looks like you are stuck with us free thinkers for good. Oh well... In the end you declare victory for yourself, and isn't that what really matters?
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
Next thunderf00t brings up how a truly religious society breeds nothing but ignorance. You ignore his examples (knowing them to be true I suspect) and do another one of your fantastic quotes. Then you once again do the whole "this is a religious society" kind of deal. Look, if this was a truly religious society, don't you think you would have won Kitzmiller v Dover? Seems that if this was a Christian nation you would have not problem getting your theories taught in school.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
I'm back!
Next you again bring up this idea that we live in a "Christian country". True, we live in one that is predominantly Christian country, but that doesn't mean that it is country of Christian doctrine (see article six of the Constitution).
Then you bring up how hospitals in America are supposedly founded primarily by Christians. Any stats to back that up, or did that come directly from your ass? And does your hospital use prayer, or medicine? I mean, prayer is pretty effective but...
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
I'm going to ignore the arguments of the video. Let me tell you it isn't easy to do so, as you are simply begging to be destroyed.
Instead I would like to address the statement in the box in the beginning. I would like to see some instances of your side being votebotted.
Your comments are thumbed down because you are all repeatedly pwned by scientific knowlege. Your videos can't maintain anything higher than two stars because they are idiotic, and everyone can see it.
I'll think for you.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
You're going to ignore the arguments of the video because it's the only thing you can do to prevent being destroyed.
However, you may as well not ignore them, since you Evoligionists are usually too dumb to even realize when you've been destroyed. Therefor, don't worry, it won't even hurt.
"Being votbotted"? Simply look at the ratings on all the videos on my channel that are relevant to evo. It wasn't a bunch "Votebiologorganisms" that did that. It was Evo "Votebots"
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Hahaha you really want me to reply to the arguments?? Alright then.
You say Sarah Palin sounds like James Madison??? Maybe you should see her incredibly articulate responses to questions such as, "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?"
Your argument for what appears to be giving soldiers prayers instead of body armor is beyond absurd. I have many Iraq war vets in my family, and each one will tell you that body armor is far more effective.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
{you should see her incredibly articulate responses to questions such as, "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?}
First you arrogantly say "Alright then", as if I'm going to be sorry for having challenged you. Then you write the statement above but it merely displays your deficiency in comprehension. "Palin sounds like Madison" was regarding she & he not being atheists, but both being of the same faith.
Your inability to comprehend correctly leads to your irrelevance which is repeated with -
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
{Your argument for what appears to be giving soldiers prayers instead of body armor is beyond absurd}
Never did I argue such a thing. Blunderfool's position is that Palin is incompetent for office exclusively because of her personal religious views. My argument is that who is better qualified than those whom have the same views as the founders? Those with views such as Blunderfool's & yours have produced the bloody streets of the French Revolution & the bloodbath of the 20th century's Marxist,
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Also, all the vets in my family happen to be both atheist, and democrats. So I guess if I asked them who they would like to have in power, that would be there answer. Not your fanatic right winger candidates what want to ban books and add indoctrination into the school system.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
{all the vets in my family happen to be atheist & democrat}
Therefor, if they said the Democraps better serve the welfare of servicemen, they'd be atheist typically lying
You simply can't understand that there being vets in your family & their views is irrelevant since you originally stated that against an argument which I never made. I'm no stranger to having servicemen relatives, 4 Air Force & 2 Army, but their assuredness of that tacos are better than Macaroni & cheese, is also irrelevant.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
First, when I originally brought up the vets in my family it was in response to 0:42 where you seem to disagree with thunderf00t on body armor being the most effective way to stop bullets. I think you just feel the need to contradict any thing he says, no matter how absurd you sound.
In your last response you alluded to how my family vets were conservative Christians, which I was correcting.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
{you seem to disagree with thunderf00t on body armor being the most effective way to stop bullets}
To many, things are not always what they "seem" to be. However, to the severely "comprehension challenged", mfaulkner12's of the world, things are NEVER as they "seem" to be. Your incomprehension hero, "Blunderf00l", first presented a Strawman by taking Palin's unofficial, private service prayer request and spinning it into an illusion in which she somehow rejects vests, while favoring prayers.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
She never mentioned anything regarding issuing vests to US soldiers being that she wasn't speaking to decision makers in Washington. She was speaking to a church congregation. Therefore, appropriately requesting prayers. Blunderf00l's strawman suggests that Christians would therefor incompetently serve in high office. I don't merely disagree with Blunderf00l on this matter. But rather, those kinds of arguments are the reasons why I know he's a Blundering Fool
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
{you alluded to how my family vets were conservative Christians}
Truly, you are not complimented by L.S.D.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
fanatically Darwinist, materialist psychos. BTW, the 20th century has been recognized as the first ever, truly secular century. Also the deadliest ever, by far. Looks as though "evolved morality" is as much BS as is that heavily mutating viruses which remain viruses are proof of your genealogical heritage having included Amoebians. Your family's vets will also tell you that the atheist, evolutionist Democraps would sooner strip them of vests than provide them with some. Others give vest & prayer
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
So the two of them are of the same faith? So WHAT? There are smart Christians and there are stupid atheists. Never did I claim that her faith was the SOURCE of her stupidity. Nor did thunderf00t. Had he thought that this was the case he would have added almost all American politicians on his list of idiots. And as for the secular societies being more violent, maybe you should take a look at Europe my man. Lowest violent crime rate, some of the highest atheist/agnostic rates.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
{Never did I claim that her faith was the SOURCE of her stupidity. Nor did thunderf00t}
There goes your inability to correctly comprehend, rearing its ugly head again. Ridiculous, considering your first post - "you are simply begging to be destroyed". I never claimed that you said "her faith was the SOURCE of her stupidity". However, Blunderf00l did indeed pre judge her to be incompetent due to her religious beliefs. But now I will say that its obvious you also believe the same as Blunderf00l
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I do think you are simply begging to be destroyed. I see now that it would be irrelevant to destroy you. No matter how thorough the destruction, you would still claim victory, as evidence in your video and comments.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
{I think u are simply begging 2 be destroyed}
You must understand, the complete lack of any remotely competent challenge from atheists, does indeed have that effect upon me. Perhaps, its the atheistically induced boredom?
{I see now that it would be irrelevant to destroy you}
"Irrelevant"? Of course, considering that neither one of us have previously even remotely alluded to anything even merely suggestive of my destruction at your hands.
Perhaps, a unintended destruction by incomprehension?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Alright then. Why don't we let voters decide who was destroyed? Oh darn, only one and a half stars. Well I'll tell you what. When I die and stand before Yahweh on my day of judgment you can laugh as I am being thrown into hell.
It doesn't matter at all because I think I have finally realized that this channel is satire. If I'm correct, I would suggest you tone it down a bit. You are making yourself look like the real thing.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
You then proceed to try and say in a pseudo-articulate manner that Sarah Palin could never muster that uniforms don't really work: look at the red coats!
Then you make that classic "we were founded on Christianity" arguments that your side loves so much. This country was founded by Christians but on ENLIGHTENMENT IDEALS. Ideals put forth by such atheists as Thomas Paine.
The next "argument" you make is to simply dismiss his statement with sarcasm and alliteration because you are SOOO clever.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
"mfaulkner12"
{You then proceed to try and say in a pseudo-articulate manner that Sarah Palin could never muster that uniforms don't really work: look at the red coats}
I believe you may have indeed aced me this time. Considering that I certainly can't return the attributional favor by proposing that yours is a "pseudo"-inarticulate manner. No Sir, you r indeed the real McCoy. A true epitome of authenticity. For example, take your highly encrypted, secret message from above. Only u hold the key
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Then you play a cute little quote by Tomas Paine, who was a known atheist, just look at ANY other quote. In fact, I'm wondering if you can send me the resource you got that quote from?
Next you play Thunderf00t's rant and then say, "oh we have no problem with REAL science" Real science of course being anything that doesn't interrupt your dogma.
Feel free to respond but I have a life I must go have and will finish this later.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
Isn't it "cute"? Cute is why I "played" it. I feel the quote was necessary for the founding of our cute little country.
National resources are a bit difficult to send within a "resource transport" deficient, YouTube comment. However, I'd be more than happy, in fact, I'd be absolutely elated to direct you to the evidential source of the Painefully faithful quote. Its likely you'll find the original document, well guarded within the Library of Congress. Or maybe on Google search
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Oh, and you should really come up with something better than these arguments from authority. It really doesn't matter if the founding fathers were Christians or Scientologists, people like PCS and Sarah Palin are products of our failing education system.... I hope... for the gene pool's sake.
Khronofox 2 years ago
{people like PCS & Sarah Palin r products of failing education system}
Perhaps they should have attended Christian, private schools? They always annihilate the public schools with their "product's" comparative test scores
You do realize don't you, that the "failing, public edu. system" is one under the complete control of atheist, evolutionist, "Ape-like thinkers". BTW, did you vote for the Marxist guy from Chicago? Public schools = no tuition, bus rides, books & lunch provided. Who'd u think?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Perhaps they should have attended Christian, private schools? They always annihilate the public schools with their "product's" comparative test scores"
Correction, PRIVATE schools are are the ones with superior test scores, this includes most private Christian schools. To think the "Christianity" of these schools is what drives their success is intellectually dishonest. Private education provides a much better environment for learning. That's a statistical fact.
Cont ->
Khronofox 2 years ago
"Perhaps they should have attended Christian, private schools? They always annihilate the public schools with their "product's" comparative test scores"
"Christian, private schools"
Saying "private, Christian" schools would be more accurate. It's a statistical fact that privatized education provides a better environment for learning and therefore better test scores. To say that the "Christianity" of a school is responsible for this is intellectually dishonest.
Continued ->
Khronofox 2 years ago
"You do realize don't you, that the "failing, public edu. system" is one under the complete control of atheist, evolutionist, "Ape-like thinkers"
Um. No? It's under control of the state governments, and government is really really REALLY good at fucking things up. I'd like to see a statistic from a credible source that shows that most people working in government are "atheist, evolutionists".
And no, I didn't vote for Obama. I found it funny that you assumed I did, though.
Khronofox 2 years ago
"Like it or not, and depsite the fallacious revisionists, you live in a country with a monumental legacy of having been founded upon the God of the Bible's principles"
No. We live in a country that was founded upon principles that are also in the Bible, and a variety of other holy books. That's why stealing, which happens to be a big "no-no" in the Bible and every other holy book is a law, while adultery another "no-no" in the Bible and other holy books isn't.
Khronofox 2 years ago
do you really think christianity is why the US is the way it is? many of the founding fathers wouldnt even be considered theists muchj less "christian" by your standards.
But forget all the appeals to authority. Our government is most certainly a secular one. Religion has thrived divorced from the state throughout history, driven by a couple religous revivals.
mbouw21 2 years ago
ok,, so if you believe in prayer so much, and you actually believe its effective,,
then why do US troops need guns?
MattChez 2 years ago
You've missed the point. Blunderfool, was claiming that Palin was not qualified simply because of her personal beliefs. He made the "strawman" argument in using, not a official, but a personal, church video, to claim that Palins official policies would be to pray only. If such a deceptively weak argument needs to be made, its only because he had an extremely weak & incorrect view to begin with. My inclusion of the Franklin quote was simply to show that he also made similar unofficial statements
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
also 'this country' by which i assume you mean america was founded on the seperation of church and state because the founding fathers new the profound negative affects religion would have.
types10000 2 years ago
This country, by which indeed I do mean America, was founded upon Biblical principles. However, the foundation of your misunderstanding, was laid by the revisionists of unscrupulously, shameless, dastardly character. It's why they're subversive, Marxists. Whom when not replacing facts with BS, they're playing with their dolls. Also under the cover of darkness. Their Professor Propaganda Puppet & their moronic media meatheads, have long flooded your ears with the mere excerpt from a private
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"This country, by which indeed I do mean America, was founded upon Biblical principles." - SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
types10000 2 years ago
Since I have already explained from where that "unamended", "unofficial" & "non legal" phrase came. It's surely a waste of time to even try to reason-roto clear your constipated cognition. Considering that you read my previously posted mention of it, is why its clear that you simply can't handle having your comfy, little, baby bubble of preferential ape, false reality burst.
Yes, yes, we hear you, loud and in upper case bold type. There, there, now, settle down. Here...baba. Rocka my ba.......
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
letter, "separation of church & state". Those bigoted bunch of hypocritical haters have intentionally used that non legal "phrase" because they've gotten away with applying it universally. They made certain to never utter the actual Constitutional amendment - "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, nor prohibit the practice thereof". Thats because it addresses only "congress". So tell me, isn't their bigoted hatred quite obvious when even school districts are forced
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, nor prohibit the practice thereof" - if i understand your country correctly then there is not just freedom of religion, but also freedom FROM religion, hence the separation of church and state.
the values and principles associated with any religion are hardly unique to it. the point is to prevent scripture from influencing law.
types10000 2 years ago
(the point is to prevent scripture from influencing law)
There's a reason why many courtrooms used to have the Ten Commandments on the wall, prior to the current Jackass era. Its because not only this country's, but most of western civilization's laws were derived from those
Of course, that was prior to the current day of super simianite secular soundness. Its been demanded by the ACLU that "The Ten" be taken down. Right about the time when they argued Americans right to have sex with children
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Ok, do some research please before you make assumptions. I will grant you that most civilizations have used "The Ten" as a moral guideline, but as for our laws and the Constitution, they are not solely derived from "The Ten". A HUGE chunk of our laws are derived from the Magna Carte and English Common Law. And the Magna Carte didnt deal with "The Ten", it dealt with the King granting certain freedoms to the Church. So, please research before showing your ignorance. I mean no disrespect.
cshayne7091 2 years ago
Guess what? The Constitution was derived from the men of the Constitutional Convention. Those were pretty much the same men that during the Revolutionary War, were nicknamed "The Bible Congress".
Guess why they were named as such? Do the research!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Apparently you didn't read my comments close enough. All I said was that our laws and Constitution were NOT SOLELY derived from the Ten.
cshayne7091 2 years ago
So if you happen to know anyone whom happens to be a card carrying, money contributing, supportive patron of the "Animalized Child Loving Utopianites" (ACLU). Then give them the highly rectally rectory recommended 2 for 1 membership deal of putting a few bucks in the Roman baskets also.
Hey, its the New-American way! How else can the analogously similar, institutional pillars of society continue to operate? As the Presidential Puppet Mongrel Mutt said, "Thank You Sodoman"
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
to prohibit "one nation under God" from being said? Federal Gov. has violated the Constitution simply by overstepping their limited powers by having control over education. Not to mention many other things. Worse yet, though the 1st was intended to restrict Congress from forcing subscription to the "church of Marx". So that the people can be free to establish as much religion as they wish. The Feds have violated that also. Take a look at the ceremonial service performed by President Perfunctory
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"to prohibit "one nation under God" from being said? Federal Gov. has violated the Constitution simply by overstepping their limited powers" - freedom from religion.
types10000 2 years ago
You ought to stop stuffing yourself with gluttonous amounts of freedom from whats not even oppressing you. Trust me, if you simply give it a try, you're going to love the taste of freedom from delusion.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Preacher on the backwards thanksgiving day. His perfunctory mentor, Wrongful Wright, preached the "Damning of America". Indeed, the pupil is delivering the hand-baskets by the bunches.
The "interpretors", intended to possess the least power, have been playing "Black Dress Barbie" with a wooden toy hammer & ruling that "the people" must be punished for not agreeing to have their religion dictated to them so as to include ceremonial marriages of abomination. Though time after time, they've been
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
granted everything previously asked for. Still, with hatred, the abominable tyrants antagonistically push the issue. They knowing where their friends are seated as violating legislators, rather than the interpretors they're supposed to be. There may be those whom opine differently, but the 1st is clear. The intentions of both the 1st & 2nd parts of it are so that the peoples religions are neither prohibited, nor dictated to them. Punishment is tantamount to dictating details of its practice.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"our prayers sir were heard..." - and the prayers of the British presumably asking for the same thing?
types10000 2 years ago
{"our prayers sir were heard..." - and the prayers of the British presumably asking for the same thing?}
The problem with your thinking lay in the "presumption". Ones prayers, should be presumed to be in accordance with God's will. If both sides were praying the same thing, then there wouldn't be a conflict, now would there? Of course not.
After the conflict ended, one side went on to often speak of "providence", the other did not. Your assignment is to discover of it.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
"Ones prayers, should be presumed to be in accordance with God's will." - if there is a god then he doesnt give a rats about humanity.
"After the conflict ended, one side went on to often speak of "providence", the other did not. Your assignment is to discover of it." - and if the other side had one they may very well have claimed the same thing, does not make it true.
types10000 2 years ago
Considering that you're crude attempt to speak against "what are" facts of history (often speak of "providence"), with mere "ifs". Doesn't change the fact that the "other side" simply didn't claim such things. After having clearly lost, why would anyone say such things?
"The mind is a terrible thing to waste"......... on falsehood of evolution!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
you have a way with words!
diuryl 2 years ago
Epic fail. You and Palin deserve each other. I would go for body armor as well.
EntropyUniverse 2 years ago 3
"EndoscopicUpinyerse"
{Epic fail}
"Septic Tale"
Yet another Evotardically told & epically pathetic, typical, Simianite Dufus' enigmatically emanated enema animation of a diarrhetically defecated, dummies dictated story
An astronomically asinine ASSertion with aspiring insertions of an ASSumed superior, primate's posteriorly produced & preposterously postulated poo-poo propaganda
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
{You & Palin deserve each other}
I'd agree if it wasn't for the fact that she's married
{I would go for body armor as well}
I would go for having the amorous swell
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
It's a sad day when a candidate of Palin's calibre is excluded from office simply because of a slight lack of foreign policy experience, whacky religious views, an inability to present herself intelligently, and no prior experience of anything remotely near the scale of the position she may have ended up in.
scepticalpreacher 2 years ago 4
"SepticHoleBleacher" of the Pretty in Pink Primate Pooters Political Party. It's an even sadder day when your pseudo science friendly, perfunctory president "Bigrack Yomomma" puts us even deeper in the hole by $1 Trillion in just that 1 sadder day. Merely to stimulate the Pretty in Pinks of the presidential pooter puckering party primates whom so enthusiastically smooch smacked his spectacularly sparkling simian sphincter. What a bunch of crimson clad, rouge rash, brilliant baboon butt boneheads
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Yup, insults, alliteration and inventing comedy names for people you disagree with sure make for convincing arguments.
scepticalpreacher 2 years ago 2
Don't cry simply because you lost. Eventually you'll learn that arguing on behalf of things false, is why you lose. Then you won't have to cry any more
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
First you bunch of cranially cavernous, cognitively cretinous clowns tried to elect the Boston Butler - "Lurch" and his nuptial "Cousin It" with her wild n wooly witchy hair and their "Heinz 57 sauce.
But then, you bunch of preposterously propagating, primitively pre-mature primates did indeed socialist-selfishly succeed in bringing us the crazily crafty, candidate's campaign of the hallucinating "High 57 states"
F$#k the Queen, she's there merely for posterity anyway. God save America!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Well, what I got from this is that America was founded by men who believed in God, and you don't have clue one what tf00t is talking about.
Here, let me pose this question: If logical thinking and reasoning, proven facts, and millions of examples of evidence isn't science, what is?
Kowzgalor 2 years ago 2
"You" haven't a clue of what TFoot was talking about. He was saying that Sara Palin is not competent for high office specifically because of her personal religious convictions. Considering how and by whom this country was founded, this country is the one in all the world in which TFoot's view is the most ridiculous
The quotes in my video which are only a few from the total that exist, demonstrate exactly why TFoot's view is so ridiculous
Communist countries have historically been materialists
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
& fanatical Darwinists, hostile to Christianity. As well as unjustly authoritarian, as are the EXPELLERS! TFoot and the other Athevolutionists like himself would be warmly welcomed there. Harmoniously devolving and self deprecating into apehood. Side by side, within a speciated population along with their Comrades!
TFoot has still retained the vestigial facial ape fur, high up to his cheekbones from the last time when his species were "ape-like creatures"
BTW "creatures" means created!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
This doesn't disprove evolution or tf00t. If you don't 'believe' in the proven fact of evolution, that's your problem. And you still haven't answered my question. Your arguments are a mash of utter gibberish. You have not given me one shred of evidence that tf00t is wrong about anything by using any means of logic of reasoning or anything us civilized people listen to.
Kowzgalor 2 years ago 3
If you want me to give you "evidence" by using "logic" & "reasoning", then I would actually have to give you predetermined theoretic explanation, corrupted by plenty of completely unreasonable illogic. Then you would promptly reject what is actually your own manner of thinking. Simply because you'd know it came from a Creationist & because you're too retarded to recognize it as your own.
Prime example - "This doesn't disprove evolution"
Tfool wasn't even arguing evo in his videos which are in
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
this video. Therefor, I wasn't even attempting to disprove evo in this video. That wasn't the "TOPIC"!
You are as cretinous as it gets. You've seen Tfoot's videos that are in this one. You've seen this video. Also, in my last reply I even explained what he was talking about. Yet, despite all that, you're still too much of a short, yellow bus, front seat, football helmeted, primate passenger to be capable of understanding whats really going on!
Get lost kid! Go find the T-Ball league.
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
You speak gibberish. I fear for your sanity and the country you vote in. I suggest heavy medication.
Kowzgalor 2 years ago
seconded
types10000 2 years ago
Sane people understand that to merely assert things like "you speak gibberish", is due to one of two things. Either ignorance or ingrownuts are keeping you from actually presenting an argument which addresses at least 1 of the many points which I presented.
I believe your problem is a acute combination of the two. Then, there's the problem of your madness. Where do you live, in the stone age? Get up to speed, everyone knows meds make you mad, then you die.......soon! Insane suggestion!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
(I think fail just about sums it up)
See that? That's the kind of disaster that occurs whenever a Athevolutionist "thinks". Next time try to remember that your forbearing ancestors were brainless amoebas and organisms can only pass on the genetics which they possess. That explains the disaster.
As for your incredible ignorance of American history, how could America have become "such a strong country" from a mere excerpt within the private letter of one individual? Or are you one of the many
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
brains? But I must admit, if there is anything from Athevolutionists that comes close to convincing me of evolution, its their claim of having brainless forbearers that have passed their genes to the Evoists. It has darn near made me a believer & still challenges my reasoned thoughts that are based on scientific empiricism. Which incidentally, is harmonious with the Biblical account of origins. After 5000 yrs. of recorded history, still, man has only observed the reproduction of the same "kind"!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
No! This is what you call infusing the truth with mocking Blunderfool.
Athevolutionists mock & ridicule much and its pathetic because they're wrong on the origins issue. I'll tell you what is truly just begging to be ridiculed. It's the claim of that your genealogical heritage includes Amoebian forbearers. Ha Ha, thats as cretinous as it gets. It defies science from which we know that organisms can only pass on the genetics which they possess. How can a brainless amoeba have descendants with
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Fail
mtlsoul 2 years ago 2
Oh yeah, certainly, and a one word argument that supports your belief in the 5,000 year old, primitive, Sumerian religion of evolution is always a raging "success"!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
again - fail
mtlsoul 2 years ago
again - raging
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Damn, Thuderfoot isn't the one making ridiculous assertions, you are.
———-/´¯/)——-- (\¯`\
———/—//———--\\—\
——--/—//————-\\—\
—-/´¯/—/´¯\———/¯`\—\¯`\
-/-/--/—/—/-|_—-_|-\---\—\—\-\ -
(-(—(—(—/-)--)--(--(-\—)—)—)-)
-\————\/--/—\—\/————/
--\———— /——\-————/
—\-———-(———)———-/
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
Hey chuichupacaca STFU your intellect sums up about 1 100th of Tfoots so get lost.
snipeshow920 2 years ago 6
"YipesNow90210", you epitomize the typical, cognitively constipated, cretinously cock-eyed clownvolutionist
You're simply too stupid to realize that you came to "my" video and actually told me to get lost from my own video
If I were ever evolutionarily stupid enough to waste my time by even clicking on one of your worthless video cartoon commercials made for the neurologically neutered, morpholobotomized mutards. Then, u can tell me to get lost. Until then, go pull off your butt cheek beanie!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I think fail just about sums it up...
the speration of church & state is what made America such a strong country and now your just about to gleefully advocating to throw it all out the window..
pseudoC78 2 years ago 4
sheeple goats that believes that "separation of church & state" is actually within the Constitution? Ha Ha, what a fool. The Marxist people whom have by design, caused u to think with a cavernous cranial cavity, are the same Federal, treasonous, CFR criminals that have brainwashed people with "separation". Guess why they peddled "separation" so much? Because the 1st amendment - "congress shall make no law respecting religion" - is specifically restricted to "CONGRESS" you moronic mental failure
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Ho boy! Finally know my posts are getting up there and no I ain't gonna say "praised be Jayzus!"
@Thunderf00t. Rock on brother. Much love and respect from this recovering Catholic and newly blossomed free thinking naturalistic humanist,Theres a beautiful world out there we need to share with each other as best we can in the brief time we have.All the very very best for you and yours Thunderf00t and may your meme propagate bountifully/exponentially/beautifully.................jus' go brother.
Rockster969 2 years ago 3
"Rockster"? "Rockster"? "Rockster"? "969"?
What's the "969" for? Were you born in 69 as I was? You, perhaps on a 9th day of a month? Mine looks like this "1369"
Also, did you know that by posting paradoxically perplexed, perfunctory primate praises to Blunderfool on my video that now you're messing with the wrong......."Holy Rock & Roller1369"?
How do you figure that you're "recovering"?
You merely went from Inquisitive Evo-Ape to Incredulous Evo-Ape. But probably devolved to abortionist
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Fail
Rockster969 2 years ago 2
Certainly! For a 1 word argument can't possibly do anything but "FAIL"!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I like how the Israelis do it. They pray to Yahweh asking Him to kick Muslim ass, then jump in their Merkava tanks and F-15s and give the Big Guy all the help He needs in kicking Muslim ass, then roll home and thank Him for letting them help Him kick Muslim ass.
angryoldfatman 2 years ago 2
I made it to only 4 minutes before saying to myself:
Stop, rm -rf *
Pseudo science ? What the ? ....
You go dream on, and just hope your in the clear... otherwise, you'll burn....
And you know how, VFX has told you how...
bwzes03 3 years ago
Listen to this cretinous constipation of cranial cognition. "only 4 minutes" because the 1st grade finger painting was too "fundy"mental for his profoundly paradoxical, computationally confounding, nourished neurological nobility of intergalactic intelligence. Yet, you ask "Pseudo science"? Perhaps singlehandedly engineering the latest space shuttle has overqualified you too much to recognize that the focus of my video isn't a scientific one? Nor was it intended to be. Dream? Forbearer Amoebas?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
World population: 6.6 Billion.
Christian Population: 2 Billion.
If simply being a Non-Christian is a crime that warrants infinite punishment, then I have 4.6 billion friends I'd like you to meet. Hey! That's like one friend for every year that the planet Earth has existed. Fancy that!
grungefreak10 3 years ago
It's easy to see why you're a lost little puppy.
How is any of what you said, relevant to the information in my video?
This video requires greater than ape intelligence to understand. Therefor, in case you watch it innumerable times and still can't figure it out. It's implications are regarding political issues and religion opposed, social injustice
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
Buddy, I am very much an agnostic. My position is very reasonable.
Did Evolution occur? Yes.
Does that mean that there's no God? No.
But does that mean that all 6.6 billion people on the planet have to assimilate into the Oh-So-Perfect Culture of Christianity lest they face an infinite punishment for their finite wrongdoings? Give me a break.
grungefreak10 3 years ago
You may perceive your position as reasonable. However, to simply assert that evolution, or anything else for that matter, is factual or valid, without presenting a supportive argument, is the most unreasonable of things
It indicates that from a lack of proper reasoning, you expect that your unexplained, unsupported view should be considered authoritatively valid.
Nothing of what I said in the video implies that people "have to assimilate". Due to incomprehension, you turn the tables.
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
The video addresses the fact that Blunderful is discriminatingly opposed to people based entirely on their religious views. Only for that reason, he deemed Sara Palin to be incompetent. My video illustrates that her religious subscriptions are exactly as were those of the US founders. If incompetence was derived purely from those views, then the War of Independence would have never been won. Much less would the country have been founded. You don't know this, but currently & since long ago, there
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
exist powerful people whom seek to rob us of the Constitution and thus, of our country itself. You may think thats silly? The capitalist system and banking enabled them to become the wealthiest in the world. But since through capitalism fortunes are made and fortunes are lost because its fair. It no longer suits them. They prefer authoritarianism, by which they can remain the wealthiest indefinitely. They "do" know that this country and its tyranny preventing constitution was founded by exactly
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
what the founders quotes in my video say. It's the reason why it's precisely they who have been & still are behind the revised early US history that many have been taught. Their power, not scientists has pushed evolution, homosexuality, misandrist feminism, anti-patriotism, anti-nationalism, multiculturalism without Americanization. Think thats silly? Take notice of the common thread between all those I have named. All are hostile to Christianity. Not by coincidence, by manipulative design
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
(lest they face an infinite punishment for their finite wrongdoings? Give me a break)
1 break, coming up. A break from unknowing is required. I doubt that you're opposed to the concept of law & order - crime & punishment. Legislation informs you of what you ought not do. Generally, if you follow the rules, there is reward. Not only do you retain your freedom, but may live with peace of mind and an opportunity to prosper. If you do what you ought not, there's punishment. It's the same concept.
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
And failure to assimilated into the Oh-So-Perfect culture of Christianity is considered a wrongdoing to your way of thinking. Well I'm sorry, but that doesn't make sense.
grungefreak10 3 years ago
Evolution is a recognizable fact that even the ancient greeks identified. What you seem to be confused on, is Darwin's explanation of evolution which is natural selection.
Stop dogmatically refusing to "believe" in evolution and start coming up with your own theory as to why species on earth evolve.
Don't be a sheep
Think for yourself
Proletariat12 2 years ago 3
You actually tell me to "think for myself"? Ha Ha, and what do you suggest, that I take a Q from you? Ha Ha Ha, you don't even know the cretinous construction of your own thoughts.
Listen to yourself - "Stop dogmatically refusing to "believe" in evolution and start coming up with your own theory as to why species on earth evolve"
Thats telling me to believe in evo (species evolving) & yet, still telling me to come up with my own theory of why species evolve???
Cretinous constituents of evo!
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Therefor, using a complete non issue in a invalid argument which actually only attacked Sarah Palin's "personal" religious beliefs, is ad hominem. Especially when recognizing that Blunderfool's argument is severely foolishly flawed. As if the Democrats would truly make military expenditures in buying bullet proof vests. If anyone would, it would have been McCain/Palin. She might have personally handed out a few along with saying that they're in her prayers. From Dems get - 0 vests & 0 prayers
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
You've the audacity to utter the words "ad hominem"? You haven't the ability to recognize it even when it's covering the entire screen. (look again 4:54 - 5:00)
Not to mention that since my video directly addresses & wipes its booty with several of Blunderfools fallacious assertions. That its why your "Look up ad hominem" comment, is in itself ad hominem. Look it up - It's when Blunderfool manufactures a stuttering Sara Palin. Bullet proof vests were not a political issue during pres. elections
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
no offense mate, but this video seems more like a rant than a logical attempt to explain why thunderfoot is wrong.
mistereveready 3 years ago
WOW! Its truly incredible to witness the degree to which Sickular Simianists can be so dogmatically blinded to the 3 pink elephants within their VW Beetle. My video begins with a clip from the beginning of Blunderfool's video. Which contains heavily edited, "I believe" spoken repetition. This is intended to be another supposed demonstration of her supposed stupidity. A manipulative tactic that works on stupid people such as yourself, simply because your "illogic" dictates that she's accurately
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
depicted because its a fact that she's stupid. Its the same dog, excuse me mate, Dingo tail chasing, circular reasoning that tells evolutionists that if evo theory were valid then it would be supported by the existence of transitional species. However, the evidential transitionals are claimed to be us and all living organisms because evolution is valid. How's that for a real gem of Evomisogynist's monopoly on logic. If you desire some more requirement for posterior stitching, you've come to the
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
right place. Many evoists require that you comply with their rules of basically endorsing the delusion of evo's validity before you can debate against evo on their videos. That Logic Meister maneuver aside, I'm going to require that Amoebian Simianites first read all the fantastic ass-rippings that I've already issued, before they bring their asses of aspirational Baboon configurations. I've grown tired of so many grown, princess, ape-men-creatures ending up crying me sobbing sad songs, speaking
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
of newly reconfigured, dearly departed, crimson clad, Baboon booties. My truly correct logic is as follows - Blunderfool says that Sara Palin would have been the worst possible selection for high office. This, he bases entirely upon her religious beliefs. My video is to demonstrate that of all the candidates for pres. & vice, her world & life view is the most like that of the country's founders. If you wish to reply with having me hear the humanists predetermined revisionist account, I already
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
have. Their historup story told at todays university institutions of higher degrees of moronically meted mumblings from the perfunctory "Professor Profusely Propagating", whom indelicately indoctrinates with the highest intellectual virtues of gender, race, social class, homosexuality & a splash of honorary, terrorist group member, speakers. That hissingstory is unharmonious with the 18th century, American colonial panorama that was strewn with little white buildings with tall steeples
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
Here's some quotes from Benjamin Franklin not taken out of context...
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Poor Richard's Almanack, 1758
"Lighthouses are more helpful than churches."
"He (the Rev. Mr. Whitefield) used, indeed, sometimes to pray for my conversion, but never had the satisfaction of believing that his prayers were heard." Franklin's Autobiography
"In the affairs of the world, men are saved, not by faith, but by the want of it."
stevenweir76 3 years ago
By the way,the stratocaster is an example of human creativity at its best.Maketing and selling it's corperate cloned 'planks' for nearly £700 is an example of why capitalism realy sucks as the the strat is very low tech and probably costs less than £40 to produce.
stratocaster539 3 years ago
Manufacturing and selling the Stratocaster was something possible for one guy to do simply because that is exactly what the whole idea was for having a capitalist system. The capitalist system is precisely why it even happened. The ironic thing about that story, in light of your willful ignorance, is that its one of those stories that most epitomizes capitalism in action. Which in turn, produces the undeniably evidential, stone engraved fact that yours epitomizes "willful ignorance".
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago
so...who has saved this 'capitalist 'system then?You must have been asleep for the last couple of months.how ignorant,or perhaps deluded would be more apt?
stratocaster539 3 years ago
An ignorantly sleepy delusion is what is conducive of a view that thinks the capitalist system is being "saved" every time that the ultra rich are insured