How is OmniDeism Different from OmniTheism/Omnism then?
I myself am an Anti-theistic Agnostic-Deist{PanDeistic or PanenDeistic leanings} concerned with keping all valid form sof Deism clear of the influence of or connection with the dangerous ideal of faith and theism.
Based in reason- as Deism has always been.
I know many get Omnitheism/Omnism mixed with OmniDeism with PanDeism and PanenDeism. That concerns me.
...Why not study only nature? Some religions texts are valid, somewhat reason-based, enlightenned by nature, the Tao Te Ching for example. Aside from the revealed religions aspect, Crowleys "Book of the law" is pretty good. Ancient Hindu cosmology is pretty good.
Certain Satanist and Pagan writings also.
Much of Buddhas ideas were enlightenned for his time.
But in most of the above are undesribale lements as well{except tao te ching}.
...let me rephrase I don't wish to say 'must'{as a command}, but we SHOULD as Deists of any sort, reject and condemn most religious scriptures written by man for revealed religions{not neccaserily all}- especially the Bible,Quran, and Tanakh{Jewish bible}.
Our only word beeing nature, our tools for deciphering REASON above all, and science, and personal experiences{if contemplative or meditative,etc}.
Intriguing.
How is OmniDeism Different from OmniTheism/Omnism then?
I myself am an Anti-theistic Agnostic-Deist{PanDeistic or PanenDeistic leanings} concerned with keping all valid form sof Deism clear of the influence of or connection with the dangerous ideal of faith and theism.
Based in reason- as Deism has always been.
I know many get Omnitheism/Omnism mixed with OmniDeism with PanDeism and PanenDeism. That concerns me.
Why need we study ALL religious texts?
Why
CONT...
Iconoclastithon 3 years ago
....CONT;
...Why not study only nature? Some religions texts are valid, somewhat reason-based, enlightenned by nature, the Tao Te Ching for example. Aside from the revealed religions aspect, Crowleys "Book of the law" is pretty good. Ancient Hindu cosmology is pretty good.
Certain Satanist and Pagan writings also.
Much of Buddhas ideas were enlightenned for his time.
But in most of the above are undesribale lements as well{except tao te ching}.
As Deists{of any sort} we must
CONT...
Iconoclastithon 3 years ago
...CONT;
...let me rephrase I don't wish to say 'must'{as a command}, but we SHOULD as Deists of any sort, reject and condemn most religious scriptures written by man for revealed religions{not neccaserily all}- especially the Bible,Quran, and Tanakh{Jewish bible}.
Our only word beeing nature, our tools for deciphering REASON above all, and science, and personal experiences{if contemplative or meditative,etc}.
Anyways, I welcome your retort.
In Reason:
Icono
Iconoclastithon 3 years ago