Added: 5 years ago
From: googlemilitary
Views: 45,894
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • HOLY SHI-

    That was the biggest rocket I've ever seen (guess I haven't seen many rockets, eh ?)

  • need three of them.

  • What's the music behind this one? It's kind of catchy.

  • And the birds?

  • voy a poner uno en el teja de mi casa

  • It would sure suck to be a bird around one of these bad boys.

  • False sense of security.

  • The music is very upbeat. I like it, wonder what it is too.

  • what is the music?

  • yea there are going to be stricker there gonna be on some light weight tank that its defense system is missile defence think its called the

  • There must be a system like this to intercept the short range Russian missile or mortar attack for defending US missile system that Americans are installing it in eastern Europe while this deals with Russian ICBM`s

  • Protip: The AMS in eastern Europe is not there for the russians. It wouldn´t be able to wether an alpha strike due to sheer numbers and the more modern russian ICBMs have warheads that engage in evasive maneuvers, making them all but immune against those interceptors.

  • I think it called the thad system

  • i want that laser, ultimate weapon to snipe with!!

  • the israelis are dumb, stubborn fucks.instead of wasting time on their "iron dome" they should try out the skygaurd system to see how it performs.

  • 5 Stars!

  • Israel will nuke Iran, the US would too.

  • kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

  • So what happens to any satellites, aircraft or friendly pilots that might be above the system when it fires?

  • but that can not handle 90 000 missle from iran

  • Iran does not have 90000 missiles, nor do they have missiles that can reach very far. And if they tried anyshit, we would nuke the entire country.

  • Because Islam is a religion of peace? lol. You're a barbaric idiot who live in the dark ages. Fuck off cunt!

  • Can Small electro-magnetized missiles levitate on a Jet's wing.Wing does not touch missile at all,only magnet levitation.Small missiles will obtain there own laser energized magnetism,because of solar cells that are around the missiles,they can become energized, photo-voltaic cells and can make magnet levitation,see when laser light shines(not sun light)on the missile's solar cells.This allows so creates levitation fields.Could be hard to balance the missile levitate properties,in high g-forces.

  • How to bypass Mthel?

    Think decoys.

    Not just 1 or 2 fake rockets but like 12+

    Now aim it at the actual mthel and its got no chance to survive because it has too aim one after another at them all until it actual hits.

    There will never be a perfect weapon,

    just better ones.

  • Think 100 mthels, not 1. It can take down anything.

  • "Think 100 mthels, not 1. It can take down anything."

    For the price of a hundred of these things, you could afford to launch literally thousands of cheap rockets at them., to the degree that some will get through.

  • yeah however the practicality of thousands of cheap rockets being launched without retaliation is inprobable

  • "yeah however the practicality of thousands of cheap rockets being launched without retaliation is inprobable"

    Nah. All it requires is a delayed ignition and enough skill to set them up properly. By the time the rockets start, the guys setting them up would likely be miles away.

    And it gets even worse on a real battlefield.

  • Rockets can be shot down. Lasers can't.

    That is, unless you spend $50 tops on using goddamn mirrors.

  • Sorry, but it isn´t THAT easy. Though hardening a projectile agianst this kind of system is definitely possible.

  • True, but all you'd need is a bunch of mirrors, and pow, you've made this a glorified laser pointer.

  • But I get your point. Mirror's wouldn't be a miracle cure, there's still some heat; just not enough to be effective anymore.

  • @TGram29 What do you think of using CWIS fire instead? 20 MM rounds can definitely finish off any rocket traveling at high speeds.

  • @tehnewblife just fucking put mirrors on everything

  • @TGram29 You can't put mirrors on everything, that's why. How are you going to put a mirror on a projectile accelerating to 900fps down a barrel surrounded by superheated gas and keep it clean, un-marred, and smooth?

  • @tringalij coat it in matt damon's blood and hope for the best

  • @Magni56 Not the point, if you try to stage thousands of cheap rockets your footprint will be so big that any recon will see you and strike you before you can launch, not to mention the upscale C2 you need to coordinate a simultaneous strike. We need defense against small scale mobile pop-up threats. We already can pre-strike large scale assaults before they are built.

  • @tringalij

    Thousands? One or two dozen will already be enough that any concentration of these things becomes unrentable due to sheer maintenance requirements. And upscale C2 in this case are a guy that has read a few books nad got a pocket calculator. That, and the launch teams having wristwatches and made sure they're all on the same time.

  • @Magni56 thats true. But israel relies on its airforce once they are attacked, or are going to be attacked in the case of egyp in 67, so setting up those rockets would be noticed or else they would be there pretty quick taking out targets. But some would probably still get through. They do also have a missile based missile deffense shield so that would help to. But the point is that few would get through, much fewer than would get through to Iran or wherever they are attacked from

  • @durhamdf

    I was talking about Hamas or Hezbollah-style home-made rockets. Where two guys can set it up in a field. And if you want to bring Iran into it, there's not exactly much Israel can do on its own against Iran unless it goes nuclear. For all the advantages, Israel simply doesn't have the strategic depth and redundancies to survive against a sustained campaign from something like Iran, while the Iranians have that ability to actually sustain hits and keep going.

  • @Magni56 well a few advantages Israel has, U.S. and Saudi support (by giving full use of their air space) and Israel has more than twice as many aircraft as Iran. Israel has a much more well developed missile system both ground to ground and surface to air. And Iran has to be very careful where it bombs because they don't want to piss off the "palestinians"

  • @durhamdf

    More weel developed missile-system? Which one? In terms of ballistic missiles, they're outmatched. Not to mention that the IAF can't even rach a good deal of Iran and that the Iranians aren't just another bunch of idiotic arabs. They're actually a decent fighting force, both in equipment and competence. And frankly, as inaccurate as evne the oldest missiles in Irans arsenal might be, they're not going to miss an entire city and land in the Gaza Strip.

  • @Magni56 First of all if war with Iran did break out 1000 minute man missiles would be on the way in half a second but secondly Israel depends much more on its air force since its land is small and missile sites are more easily hit than a cruise missile launched from an Israeli fighter jet. But as for missile deffense, Israel dominates Iran. Iran is still using crappy cold war s 200's which are easily fooled. Israel has the arrow 3 with a 99% kill rate

  • @durhamdf

    No, there wouldn't be a single minute-man. Going nuclear willy-nilly is utter suicide in today's world. Let alone a thousand Minutemen, which nobody even has. The entire currently active US arsenal consists of 450 Minuteman-III! And missiles sites are not easiyl hit when they're camouflaged, mobile and protected by actually modern air defense systems. Like the S-300 and Tor M-1 Iran is toting around.

  • @Magni56 First of all Iran doesn't have any s-300's, they only have s-200's from the cold war, and Russia pulled out of a deal to provide the s-300's. But it is a lot easier to target missile sites in a tiny land base like israel then it is to target planes firing cruise missiles. But the minuteman doesn't have to be a nuclear warhead and last time I checked Iran hasn't tested any nuclear weapons so if Israel did nuke Iran there aint much they could do about it...

  • @durhamdf

    Yes, they have S-300s. FFS; they evne bloody paraded them around and they've been spotted numerous times on sattelite footage by now. And no, targetting a mobile SAM unit crewed by competent soldiers is not easy by any means. NATO flew over 2000 SEAD mission in the 1999 Kosovo campaign, yet reported less than 3 dozen hits, with only three hits against the SA-6, which were the only truly mobile system the serbs had.

  • @durhamdf

    Targetting cruise missiles and planes is in fact rather easy when you have modern SAMs, a redundant radr net and an airforce of your own that can operate far more freely than enemy planes due to fighting over their own territory, close to base. And the only Minutemen existing right now, all 450, are nuclear. And yes, Iran could dos something about it. Namely, dropping enough conventional and chemical warheads on Tel Aviv to wipe out the city, which will factually collapse Israel.

  • @Magni56 Too bad Iran doesn't have modern SAMs, the have s200's that they slightly modified in house and called it a domestic production. And no look it up, Russia backed out of the S 300 deal. But if Iran was stupid enough to use chemical weapons on tel aviv, the U.S. and Israel would be carpet bombing Iran night and day. We'd call it "Shock and Awwwwwe Shit"

  • @durhamdf

    Too bad that it is a proven fact that Iran has both S-300 and Tor-M1 systems, no matter how many times you deny it. So, how aobut you look up the fucking sattelite images of S-300s in Iran. Or the fucking pictures when they paraded them through fucking Tehran.

    ANd your carpet bomb night and day fantasy would still not change the fact that Irna has just eradicate Tel Aviv, which is enough to functionally cause ISrael to collapse as a nation.

  • @Magni56 Russia never gave Iran S 300 's look it up. Iran CLAIMED to have built it themselves but conspicuously never showed any proof of this claim. Anyways, the S-300's are 20 years old!!! Won't help them against thousands of Israeli Delilah Cruise Missiles. And taking out tel aviv would only be a temporary blow even if Iran could pull it off, which is a pipe dream. The Israeli economy is rooted in international financial institutions, they could temporarily move shop to New York.

  • @durhamdf

    Iran has been PROVEN BEYOND ANY SHADOW OF DOUBT, REPEATEDLY, to have several S-300 systems in their possession, look it up. Annd those '20 years old' missiles are superior to anything the US has in terms of ground-based air defense. And guess what? Israel only has "thousands" of cruise missiles in your dreams. The actual numnbers are far less impressive.

  • @Magni56 How have they proven this? The international community still says it bs along with Russia who supposedly gave thme their s 300's. You wont find a single confirmed s 30 launch in Iran. This is not my opinion, this is fact. And Israel does have thousands of delilah and arrow cruise missiles, but that isn't where they REALLY dominate Iran. That is in the Air Force arena. The Israeli Air Force dwarfs the pathetic Iranian Airforce.Not to mention most of Irans fighter jets are at least 10 y/o

  • @durhamdf

    Destroying Tel Aviv would NOT be a temporary blow, it would be the death knell for Israel as a functioning nation. And Iran can pull it off easily outside your ignorant, delusional wank fantasies. And that's all you have shown here: Complete ignorance and delusion.

  • @Magni56 All Israel would have to do to cripple Iran would be to bomb their nuclear reactors which provides a huge portion of Iran's energy supply. And since Iran doesn't have the current capacity to refine enough oil for itself, and doesn't have enough oil power plants, it cannot just make the switch to oil to provide their own power.

  • @durhamdf

    Good thing then that Israel doesn't evne have the ability to reach msot of Irans reactors and doesn't have the ability to effectively strike at the remainder without sacrificing the majority of their entire air force. You know, back here in reality, here your ignorant delusions and wishful thinking don't apply. Not that it'd either change the fact that any such act would mean Tel Aviv getting leveled, effectively ending Israel as a nation.

  • @Magni56 well Israel has alrady hit an Iranian reactor, good theory though...And again, Israel doesn't rely on its domestic domand for financial services, wich is small. Instead they rely on international markets like Europe and the United States. So yeah rebuilding tel aviv would be a drain on the economy but would be far from a death blow. Iran is already hurting because of the embargo, and if Israel (using Saudi airspace) started hitting nuclear reactors, Iran would become Yemen overnight.

  • @durhamdf

    Also, enjoy a new Great Depression as Iran shuts down the Straits of Hormuz, crahsing the international oil market. And again, the USN itself attests that they can't stop that fast enough to prevent a massive disaster. So yeah, you'd call it "Awww, shit", once you're paying $10 per gallon at the gas station.

  • @Magni56 A. America gets a small perentage of its oil from the middle east and a tiny portion from Iran so we can just go through the red sea to get our oil from the Saudis B. Iran's navy is absolutely useless, the U.S. would absolutely crush any attempts to block its ships in international waters. Iran doesn't own the straits...not like egypt owns the suez canal, and remember what happened when egypt tried to close suez?

  • @durhamdf

    OIL IS A FRUNGABLE GOOD, YOU MORON. That's economics 101. 30% of the worlds oil goes through the straits. Cut that off and you end up with the entire market suddenly having 30% less supply while demand stays the same. The result? The worldwide market price goes through the fucking roof. Adn no, the Red Sea isn't worth jack shit in comparison. Irans navy is able to block the straits for at least one month, according to THE US NAVY ITSELF.

  • @Magni56 You have very little understanding of the oil market. The price of oil is controlled by oil speulators who "bet" on the price of oil driving it up and and pull out making it bottom out. THe actual supply has less of an effect. But like I said earlier, the U.S. gets a small portion of its oil imports from the mid east. We get our oil mainly from mexico and canada with Saudi Arabia and Vanezuela coming in a close 3rd and 4th. And we can get oil from S.A. through the red sea...

  • @durhamdf

    Wether Iran owns the straits or not is fucking irrellevant. They can blockade it and keep that up for one month at the low end, which is enough to crash the international oil market. A naval fight inside the straits would be a knife-fight in a telephone booth. Small subs, small attack craft, ground-based ASM launchers and SAM sites, mines galore. The absolutely worst scenario possible for the USN, which is focused on open sea engagements.

  • @Magni56 really, they can blockade it? They don't seem t be able to do shit against the U.S. blockade... And that would be an act of war that nations that do rely on Mid East oil would not take sitting down. Iran would be signing its own death warrant if they tried that. Again look at what happened when Egypt tried to nationalize the Suez Cannal

  • so the actual beam is invisible huh?

  • we (humans) only see a small spectrum of electromagnetic waves. I guess this beam is not in that range :)

  • The beam in Infrared... Humans see only the spectrum between ultraviolet and infrared. This beam in a 0.5-1mm wave or something. Eyes see only between 400 and 700 nm if Im correct.

  • you're correct ;)

  • sorry my english may not be perfect but my phd from electronic is valid so i say that disign of veapon shown in video is imposable

    2.veapon shown above is nihgt light used somwhere to light arias jeil like

    3. as far as laser tehnology go with laser used in army u can just perfectly chek atitude and latitude and distance from a to b poent

    4i think far more advenced veponery is based on radio frekvency

  • this machine need for america one day

  • what kind of music is that? sounds like this typical american military music. cool

  • This is the coolest and most awsomest video I have ever seen.

    GG USA

  • First: this is not microwave technology but infrared spectrum of electromagnetic energy. Second: There is no possibility of missing the target. (P.S. microwave tech. is being developt as substitute for EMP pulse - Beta and gamma radiation )

  • too much gobbledygook just to say nothing. This is just a very powerful chemical laser. Emp pulses can be generatedwith powerful herfs, microwaves have nothing to do with it.

  • lol this is not posible 2 resons why one is mikrovave tehnology is not that advenced 2 IF U MISS TARGET U HIT SOON OR MOON AND THAT TAKES LOT OF ENERGY

  • actualy my brother tests these things and he says this one is the best

  • I saw litle of new army stuf made by srbijan remember nikola tesla is from serbija i think laser culd not heat projectile laser is used to kill animals beez and insects to control weather and teoretikly to mind control combined by frekvency but im sure laser culd not stop rockets

  • Grow up and study physics. And some grammar. What the hell, go to Wikipedia. I guess that at least you learned how to read.

  • And what you are saying doesn't make any sense. It is not even logical, and kid you should stop filling with fantasy the gaps of ignorance and become more factual.

  • it is real, whether u think so or not

  • that rocks! the key is the targeting time. Laser heats up the incoming round till detonation. If the israelis use this to guard "known" terrorist launch sites you would have the advantage against small to medium salvos.

  • Hollywood laser.Was that not the laser that coddent stop the Hezbollah small Katushas.The laser cant help you when the Iranian Shahab missile goes in cluster missiles.Coming in 100s up your ass

  • And THEN we finally get tired of your misbehaviour and give you something to cry about.

  • so...what if it has a mirror on the projectile/missle?

  • And what if you do a pirouette in front of a shotgun. About as effective.

  • lol @ music. Team America .. Fuck Yeah

  • I wonder if they can shoot down planes with this thing.

  • lol, with all this they yet lost to Hezollah a second time.

  • It's both awesome and scary, the power that thing has.

  • is it laser or infrared?

  • This is the defense system that the U.S designed for isreal to protect from hezbollah rockets. It is in action over there

  • this system was designet buy (IAI-iasrai aircraft industries) fore US and israel borders!

  • no it wasn't. It was designed by Northrop Grumman, a USA  defense company.

  • It does seem mature enough to be at least deployable for base defence where power and lack of mobility are not a problem, and on warships replacing phalanx. RAM BPDS backed up by a laser CIWS is vital with probable swarm attacks in future sea warfare.

  • Now if we can do that on the ground, better believe we can do it from space ! Ooh Rah!!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more