People! Shut up about her age... I think that SHE would know HER age, when SHE shot HER scenes, y'all weren't there, and plus, movies like Star Wars aren't finished in 1 year of production, it's a long process
She was born in 1985, and the film was released in 1999, although that might be it, because the date is only of distribution, not necessarily shooting.
But that would be odd to shoot something that early.
She was 14, not 12 :p she was born in 1985 and star wars was 1999? Unless it was filmed 2 years earlier.... But that wouldn't make any sense would it? But anyways thats embarassing for her.... Wasn't he in king Arthur with her though?
@GoldenPebs it 'would' make sense because post-production wasn't as easy as it is today and since she wasn't in a big part of the film they probably shot those scenes early on and close together.
Yes, because they film and release a big movie like Star Wars in a matter of months. Her scenes were probably filmed at the start of 1998 when she was still 12. It came out in May 1999, so a year is to be expected working on such a film, with all the special effects etc
How can she not look at Ewan McGregor? That poor girl! I don't know what she's so embarrassed about. 1. She was twelve. 2. She's Keira Knightley and I bet lots of guys(Ewan included) drool over her. 3. Today, half(if not more) of the magazine photoshoots she does, she's naked or topless, so what does it matter? I think she should just have a hot love scene with Ewan McGregor and that'll solve things.
The similarity between Knightley and Natalie Portman meant that during the filming of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999), their own mothers could not tell them apart once in makeup.
I was tall when I was twelve as well. I couldn't understand why older guys were hitting on me until my mother pointed out that I looked older. It's makes puberty a living hell.
yes because intentional nudity for your profession and accidently falling off a golf buggy, aged 12, wrapped in nothing but a towel, before an older guy who you're star struck by is EXACTLY the same thing.
People! Shut up about her age... I think that SHE would know HER age, when SHE shot HER scenes, y'all weren't there, and plus, movies like Star Wars aren't finished in 1 year of production, it's a long process
coldplay4321 4 weeks ago
B-b-but, she must have been at least 14...
She was born in 1985, and the film was released in 1999, although that might be it, because the date is only of distribution, not necessarily shooting.
But that would be odd to shoot something that early.
rorrt 2 months ago
@CAgirl304 She's played one of the Queens decoys, she's wearing all the make-up and stuff so it's hard to tell x
LadeyYuna 3 months ago
lol nah i tihnk she was like 14-15 at that time not 12
hybridgohan 4 months ago
@hybridgohan The movie was shot in 1997.
Starkardur 4 months ago
@hybridgohan 1. who cares? 2. how would you possibly know?
tha3immortals 1 month ago
@tha3immortals 3. suck my balls
hybridgohan 1 month ago
Cripes could that fringe get much longer?? That would bug me so much having it in my eyes like that
prematurepopstar900 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Aw!! I just turned 13, and if that happening to me in front of someone I admire...I'd die. :) Poor Keira!
ILoveHorses370 5 months ago
Comment removed
ILoveHorses370 5 months ago
her fringe is was to low!!
partygirl209 6 months ago
So who's gonna be the one to cast these two in the same movie again?? lol
plasma4ce 7 months ago
Nope he wasn't - my bad :p and the release date was July 1999 so was it filmed 2 years earlier?
GoldenPebs 7 months ago
She was 14, not 12 :p she was born in 1985 and star wars was 1999? Unless it was filmed 2 years earlier.... But that wouldn't make any sense would it? But anyways thats embarassing for her.... Wasn't he in king Arthur with her though?
GoldenPebs 7 months ago
@GoldenPebs it 'would' make sense because post-production wasn't as easy as it is today and since she wasn't in a big part of the film they probably shot those scenes early on and close together.
plasma4ce 7 months ago
@GoldenPebs
Yes, because they film and release a big movie like Star Wars in a matter of months. Her scenes were probably filmed at the start of 1998 when she was still 12. It came out in May 1999, so a year is to be expected working on such a film, with all the special effects etc
belbird 6 months ago
I very much doubt she wasn't wearing any underwear, also. Such exaggeration.
18thOfThe9th1983 8 months ago
can anyone tell me what she say or translate it???
annetis11 1 year ago
Comment removed
annetis11 1 year ago
How can she not look at Ewan McGregor? That poor girl! I don't know what she's so embarrassed about. 1. She was twelve. 2. She's Keira Knightley and I bet lots of guys(Ewan included) drool over her. 3. Today, half(if not more) of the magazine photoshoots she does, she's naked or topless, so what does it matter? I think she should just have a hot love scene with Ewan McGregor and that'll solve things.
orlandogirl213 1 year ago 3
she looked 18 or 16 in my opinion...
lolitaleah94 1 year ago 2
"legs everywhere" hahaha aint she just cute ^___^
OneKid122 1 year ago
that is one hot looking lady..I am sooo having evil thoughts right now
TheLeatheryman 1 year ago
OMG, poor Keira!
FantasmaLuna 1 year ago
i don think so..it was embarrasing
rooseveltmarimbaesf 1 year ago
She was in star wars but didn't remember much? I wouldn't forget a thing being in such a big movie even as a minor role.
GunDelight 1 year ago 3
@GunDelight She played Padme's decoy. I only found this out myself recently.
therealcharlotte1 11 months ago
she was 14 years old NOOB
Diabloskriller 1 year ago
The similarity between Knightley and Natalie Portman meant that during the filming of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999), their own mothers could not tell them apart once in makeup.
rooseveltmarimbaesf 1 year ago
omg sooo Sobiwan!
LOL
Sims2Reader 1 year ago
at twelve? poor keira
DazzledRose3193 1 year ago
only 12? poor thing
YourInnerMan 2 years ago
I was tall when I was twelve as well. I couldn't understand why older guys were hitting on me until my mother pointed out that I looked older. It's makes puberty a living hell.
jemjean 2 years ago
tell me about it...Im 17 and look 24....when I was 12 I looked 16!
:D
babyamelie2 2 years ago
It stinks, doen't it? Boys your own age don't want anything to do with you and older boys want too much to do with you.
jemjean 2 years ago 2
@jemjean same here! I went through the same thing!! :)
Luv2FigureSkate8 2 years ago
Its crap! and u get those pervy comments and smiles from men down the street...:S
babyamelie2 2 years ago
poor keira!
xxOrlandoandJessexx 2 years ago 3
OMG i wouldn't have been able to look at ewan mcgregor either after something like that.
poor keira lol
DramaLlama240 2 years ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
looks like her bodyfat is higher heh
Dream308 2 years ago
love her she's beautiful
darthdrummer89 2 years ago 4
i love her accent.
willthereveal2 2 years ago 5
you mean her posh talk. :D
however i like it too.
but she was only twelve back then?? Omg. I wouldn't tell.
EnnaSilme 2 years ago 3
jesus she was tall for twelve!
but Natalie Portman is tiny
kirstyasher2 2 years ago 3
What was she in star wars? I don't remember her...
hfordfilms 2 years ago
She plays the queen's decoy. When you see the "queen" in the movie it's often Keira Knightley's character disguised as the queen.
Fredvdp 2 years ago 6
She was "Sabé", one of the maidservants of Padmé (Natalie Portman)
didpez 2 years ago
The double to Amadala. And they truly do look alike to this day.
lollipopfop 2 years ago 3
Looked kinda old for 12
twiklinglilstar 2 years ago 4
well in the movie the queen does wear a lot of makeup, so i guess that helped.
alyce4jensen 2 years ago
it is very expressive in this interview
melanie29200 3 years ago
I thought she was fourteen... She is like me: since young, we always have been the tallest girl of the class.
petitanyell1 3 years ago
SHE WAS TWELVE?!?
my godd... that is trippy O.O
BlackInvisibleWings 3 years ago 29
*nods* yup, poor girl
SouthamptonRose 3 years ago
Aww bless her, i would of been really embarrassed if that was me. Most people would i'm sure.
xxezxx 3 years ago
wonder if ewan remembers it
PolexiaAphrodisia 3 years ago 5
i don't understand :( could someone explain me why it was a bad experience for keira ? thx
(sorry i'm french)
Smerfetkadu31 3 years ago
She was naked in front of the main actor in the film.
sal4bryant 3 years ago 2
I didn't think she would be naked! I would have thought she would have have on some clothes even if it was just some shorts or something!
Embarrassing!!
CarmellaKey 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GIVE ME A BREAK!!!
She has done all kinds of nasty nude sex scenes!.....starting at age 15!.......don't give me that "oh I was so modest and embarrassed" bullcrap!
whutzat 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
YOU ARE SO RIGHT!
carmenaudrey 3 years ago
yes because intentional nudity for your profession and accidently falling off a golf buggy, aged 12, wrapped in nothing but a towel, before an older guy who you're star struck by is EXACTLY the same thing.
lo80589 3 years ago 36
your comic made my day
estagonandfire 1 year ago
she's funny
annaisjesus 3 years ago
o wow that must be very embarassing, at age 12 too!
dmg051793 3 years ago 19
i know! how sad...poor keira lol ;)
SouthamptonRose 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shes got no titties. sad.
bluntastik 3 years ago
lmao
archuletarox321 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
she is stupid
corky3221 3 years ago
lol sorry, i favorited it too.
Titanic15x1912 4 years ago
lol thanks. i feel so bad for her!!! ;)
SouthamptonRose 4 years ago
I had no idea she was in Star Wars! lol. great video! 5 stars!!
Titanic15x1912 4 years ago 2
She played Queen Amidala's decoy, Sabé ;-)
RachelSkywalker 4 years ago 7