Re: My magnet motor ideea

[yousmoke1]

you freakin alkie

[jbignes5]

I won't bother answering any more to your banter since you serve no usefull purpose other then to sound like the very names you call others.

[Desertphile]

"I won't bother answering any more to your banter since y....."

Thank you for conceding defeat.

[jbignes5]

You sitting here bashing people only on the fact that they mislabled the observations as "Free Energy" is down right ludicrist. The observations are there for anyone to see, if they would only take the 100 year old blinders off and take the experiments for what they are, OBSERVATIONS. Then again you take a certain pride in slinging your labels for other people who are looking to only explain what they saw or experienced. Time better spent on learning and doing for yourself.

[Desertphile]

"You sitting here bashing people only on the fact that they mislabl...."

There is no such thing as "free energy."

[jbignes5]

No one said there was. but there definetly seems to be an underlying sub energy that can be mistaken by most as "Free" because they misunderstand where it is comming from. Now that the scientists are understanding the current electricity has an actual sub component that permeates everything it is apparent where that "Free" is comming from. But I understand that you have no intention of keeping current with the news and disregaurd anything that doesn't fit in your bubble.

[jbignes5]

Be it as it may you are the one who is an IDIOT! Either educate yourself or get off the bandwagon and embrace the new theories as they are written, not your interpretation of thiers. In fact why don't you learn by experience and experiment like the rest. Unless the only reason you are doing this banter is to get a certain rub out of people so they pay attention to you. Either way you are the one who looks like a fool.

[Desertphile]

"...and embrace the new theories as they are written....."

Okay, I give up: What "new theories" are you talking about?

Free energy is impossible.

[jbignes5]

Theories are analytical tools for understanding and explaining a given subject matter. They are not facts but perceptions of the one who is looking at the facts or experiment. When you start putting theories ahead of facts you loose the reality. What some are experimenting on doesn't conform to the facts because the theories from 100 years ago are in error. They were right for then but today our observations are way more accurate. When we realize that, thats when our new tech will flourish.

[Desertphile]

"They are not facts...."

Theories are made up of facts, idiot.

[jbignes5]

Theory mean by Webster:

1: the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another

2: abstract thought : speculation Theories therefore are not Facts only observations of a set of facts. Weather or not they are true is based on resoning of the idividual Not facts! Case in point Theories were at one point that the earth was flat. We now know this to be untrue.

[jbignes5]

I do capitulate the "Free" label. But there seems to be an energy that current theories does not cover. Theories are not facts, they are Ideas that formulates someone thoughts on a subject that trys to become a fact. Theories can never become superior to facts. Facts are what we see, Reality, and those are born from experiments. When experiments show that a theory is incorrect you must change that theory or it is nullified.

[Desertphile]

"But there seems to be an energy that current theories does not cover."

There is no such thing as "an energy," retard: energy is not a thing--- it is a quantity.

Moron.

[jbignes5]

Try reading up on Tom Bearden or Edward Leedskalnin. Bot are great sources on what the new theories are headed. These are not facts but actual observations of what is happening. Both have done extensive experiments on the subject and have come to some surprising theories that contradict current dogma..

[Desertphile]

"Bot are great sources on what the new theories are headed. These are not facts...."

Theories are facts, idiot.

[jbignes5]

A theory by definition AS I STATED by websters and official physics definitions is Speculation of observations of the theorist while watching an experiment. They are not facts otherwise you would just call the theory a fact and it isn't! What is speculation by definition:

A conclusion, opinion, or theory reached by conjecture.

Reasoning based on inconclusive evidence; conjecture or supposition. Learn moron learn. Go back to highschool.

[Desertphile]

"Speculation of observations of the theorist while watching an experiment."

No. A theory is a body of facts that explains an observed phenomena. You do not get to redefine words.

"Systematically organized knowledge applicable in a relatively wide variety of circumstances, especially a system of assumptions, accepted principles, and rules of procedure devised to analyze, predict, or otherwise explain the nature or behavior of a specified set of phenomena"

[jbignes5]

I am not redefining anything those are definitions taken from trusted sites that deal with defenition of words. Like websters and psysics sites. You are attempting to redefine wors that cannot be redefined. A theory is just that a theory. it isn't reality or Einstien's theories would be facts which they are not! Any highschool student would know that moron.

[Desertphile]

"You are attempting to redefine wors that cannot be redefined"

Talk to yourself in your own channel, nut.

"A theory is just that a theory."

Idiot.

"it isn't reality or Einstien's theories would be facts which they are not!"

All theories are facts; theories are made up of facts. That's what theories are: bodies of facts.

[plopo404]

LOL.. I saw the video and the rattle alone from unbalanced design would cause more friction and energy loss on his system. It is possible to achieve a more efficient motor than induction motors. Yet, exceeding 95% is impossible. You encounter frictional losses which are impossible to overcome.

The most efficient to my knowledge are german perm-motors (comp name) or Agni Lynch PM motors both being axial gap brushless motors. Brushed motors have a loss of 5-10% depending on brush composition.

[jbignes5]

Ok then do tell all of what they Know as facts not theories? I'm waiting with baited breath. See thats your problem you rely on what "They" "know" and to tell you the truth they know nothing about electrons or magnetic fields. What they can tell you is what they think it is. Anyone can do that thru observations. But since they can't see it they don't know period.

Get off your high horse and shut the "F" up already. You are just ranting on people for trying to do something you have no idea about

[Desertphile]

"Ok then do tell all of what they Know as facts not theories?"

Theories are made up of a body of facts; a theory is therefore superior to facts.

There is no such thing as "free energy." You'll just have to adjust.

[jbignes5]

The funny thing is way back it was being taught that the world was flat. You my friend think that just because they devised a mathamatical result of just what they were looking for we should believe that when in reality there are things in this world that haven't been truely figured out or explained. Thats why the thoeries of these men are still the rederic that keeps being taught in our schools. Yes the system works but only if you confine it to the rules they made to support the system.

[Desertphile]

"The funny thing is way back it was being taught that the world was flat."

That has nothing to do with this video.

Free energy is impossible: you will just have to grow up.

[jbignes5]

Why is it that you feel the need to comment on these things Desertdhile. Inserting your ideas of what the best scientists in the world can not explain. Fact is that no one has a clear and concise explanation what both magnetism and what an electron even is. You it seems have figured them both out without a shred of any evidence to prove otherwise. Great theories do not make facts. If you ever figure out even if there is an electron then you would be the most important man in the universe.

[Desertphile]

"Fact is that no one has a clear and concise explanation what both magnetism and what an electron even is."

Dear Idiot,

If you wish to know all about electrons and the electromagnetic force I suggest you attend MIT where the subject is taught in exacting detail.

[jbignes5]

You can call me whatever makes you feel big. The fact of the matter is just when these so called scientist think they know all the rules that by the way they came up with then someone comes along and proves them wrong. How do you say this person does that. By experiments that have merit not by theories that have been altered vastly from the original theories. Case in point the heaviside component to maxwell's theories. It was discarded because of the mere fact that it complicated thier dream.

[Desertphile]

"You can call me whatever makes you feel big."

No, I'll call you what you are: an idiot. Physicists know all about electrons and the electromagnetic field--- and you said they do not. Don't bother deleting your comment: I made a copy.

[GManGT]

You are done now; go out and fuck your horse again in the back yard.

[g0bl1nk1ng]

wow. you must be the most fantastic and brilliant debunker on the planet. i bet your life is just overwhelmed with happiness and fullfillment. been laid lately?

[MutantMix]

Wow! so close minded spended more time tearing down ideas YOU should look Rotoverter Demo. sure of course Believe the Conventional Theory can't you SEE For yourself EGO tistical . thats why the world is they way it is see for yourself .lol

[Desertphile]

"Wow! so close minded spended more time tearing down ideas YOU should look....."

Accepting reality is not being "closed minded," idiot.

[sunoflight396]

O my goodness... okay, I have seen enough. This man need some Mary Jane and a bag a chips.

[Desertphile]

Translation: you were unable to spot any error in my video, and that frustrated you to such an extent that the best you could do in reply was to try an insult. How very sad your worthless life must be.

[sunoflight396]

My crazy little friend, my life is glorious, you are the only person making a video on youtube making yourself out to be an idiot. Create a working model of any of your claims and post that video, other than that... you are a complete waste of air. Have a nice weekend and think about that.

[Desertphile]

I didn't make any claims, shit-for-brains. Go read a science textbook.

[Desertphile]

"I think Dr. Steven Greer is more convincing..."

Then I pity you.

[jeffln12345]

you must be a professor because you know everything and a fuking annoying at the same time

[supersandor]

You shouldn't just yell bullshit - you should say 'send me a prototype in the mail'. You keep saying 'prove me wrong and I'll IMMEDIATELY make a video where I admit I'm wrong' but this video where you flat out insult the person for making such claims contradicts your claimed policy. Remember, fantastic claims require fantastic evidence. That means you don't yell 'bullshit!', that means you yell 'prove it!' Then, WHEN he fails to prove it, you can yell 'bullshit!'

[GregDalbey]

holy shit - this guy is annoying!

[Desertphile]

"holy shit - this guy is annoying!"

Moron.

[jackson100mph]

u talk too much

[Desertphile]

"u talk too much"

Idiot.

[jwurmz]

i found something glaringly wrong about your response. you use the assumption that (insert anything here) "...WILL NEVER..." (insert anything here).

boasting a complete knowledge of any system is just plain ignorant. exponentially so when the system is as young as mankind's understanding of physics.

[Desertphile]

"... you use the assumption that (insert anything here) "...WILL NEVER..." (insert anything here)."

Magnetic fields do not contain energy, therefore there will never be a device built with magnets that produce work. *NEVER,* and no amount of effort to violate that fundamental fact will succeed. You'll just have to adjust to that fact.

[jwurmz]

i think you've confused me with someone else. i made no claims of magnetic fields containing stored energy. i did point out your ignorance in assuming complete knowledge. unless you've contributed in the development of the thermodynamics model, you can't refute other's claims for or against it. you're spouting "NEVER" without giving reasoning as to why ("because someone who is smarter than myself said so" isn't justifiable reasoning). you may as well just call him a witch...

[Desertphile]

". i did point out your ignorance in assuming complete knowledge."

Therein is your error.

[jwurmz]

how is that erroneous? you can't reinforce a silly claim like 'i know everything' without any substance. otherwise, you're just a bull ;)

[Desertphile]

"how is that erroneous?"

Your assertion that I claim I know everything is an error. Why is that not obvious to you?

Magnetic fields do not contain energy, therefore there will never be a device built with magnets that produce work. *NEVER,* and no amount of effort to violate that fundamental fact will succeed. You'll just have to adjust to that fact.

[jwurmz]

it's not obvious because it's a load of shit. when you claim that something can *NEVER* happen in a system, you are inherently claiming that you know everything about component behaviors of said system.

why keep repeating the idea that magnetic fields contain no energy? i've made no comments supporting or refuting such ideas. my point was that it is quite arrogant (and equally ignorant) to claim that something can *NEVER* (or will *ALWAYS*) happen. your replies are often off-target.

[Desertphile]

"it's not obvious because it's a load of shit."

It is obvious to everyone with a high school educator or higher.

"when you claim that something can *NEVER* happen in a system...."

... I claim a fact.

Magnetic fields do not contain energy, therefore there will never be a device built with magnets that produce work. *NEVER,* and no amount of effort to violate that fundamental fact will succeed. You'll just have to adjust to that fact.

[ParapaDrifter]

Let me tell you about the story of flatland. The 2-d world. everybody appeared as a sliver to everyone else on the universal plane.

Then one day, some foward-thinking "Cultists" theorized that the universe is not a plane, but a space. PERPOSTEROUS the people exclaimed! HANG THOSE LUNATICS FOR HERESY the law of a planar world is infallible!

That is, of course, until the cultists grew wings, let out a boisterous laugh, and yelled, Desertphile you dumb fucking son of a bitch and then killed.

[Desertphile]

"Let me tell you about the story of flatland."

I read the book: you remind me of the lines--- all anus and mouth with nothing in the middle.

Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.

[chrisracus]

You there is no such thing as "free energy".

However, the goal is to create a machine that provides usable energy output from an input source that is vastly abundant.

Like the hydrodynamic dam. snow melts in the mountains and the water powers the generators of those dams. The water evaporates in the ocean and the cycle repeats. Yes magnetic force will not create energy. It is the generator connected to the machine that creates the energy. I wish I had more room to explain. I Will email you.

[lazerboy86]

thanks gr8 comment coz people like desertphile

has tunnel vision and narrow minded about the hole idea

[Desertphile]

"...people like desertphile

has tunnel vision and narrow minded about the hole idea"

Translation: you were unable to spot any error in my video, and that frustrated your tiny little ego, so you had to resort to insult.

[lazerboy86]

no its works but not as affective as i want it to work but i'm still working on it ,

and i'm not gone show te world how it work coz if i get it to work properly then i'l patent it and sell it

[Desertphile]

"no its works but not as affective as i want it to work but i'm still working on it ,"

You mean, in other words, it doesn't work. Magnetic fields do not contain energy: you are therefore lying or mistaken.

[lazerboy86]

I DIDN'T SAY I WANT TO SPOT A XXXXX ERROR

[Desertphile]

"However, the goal is to create a machine that provides usable energy output from an input source that is vastly abundant."

No: the goal was to get energy from magnetic fields, when it is a fact that magnetic fields do not contain energy. In other words, the goal is a lie, a fraud, a deception, a sham, a con.

[JXZjeremy]

Anyone besides myself think this dudes a raving, lunatic?

[Desertphile]

"Anyone besides myself think this dudes a raving, lunatic?"

Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.

[JXZjeremy]

None, you are  totally right in your statement. I agree with you.

But you're still a raving lunatic.

[closetpunk2006]

Ya know, Desertphile, the first time I watched one of your videos I just thought you were a ranting dufus, but I must admit I'm starting to enjoy them. And I can't really dispute anything you say, even though I believe history has taught us that we should "never say never." Thanks for the entertainment - and physics refresher course.

[Desertphile]

"Ya know, Desertphile, the first time I watched one of your videos I just thought you were a ranting dufus, but I must admit I'm starting to enjoy them."

Er, thank you. And I *AM* a ranting dufus--- that's my only personality trait.

There are indeed many things that are known to be impossible, and performing work without energy is one of them; the lack of energy in magnetic fields is another.

[digitalenigma00]

Lack of energy that we have a known way to convert seems more fitting,

Im absolutley not a physics expert by any means but since you seem to know physics and respond to most post could you please explain to me what the general concenses amongst physicist is as to the origin of mangetic fields?

[lazerboy86]

YOU SUCK MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Desertphile]

"YOU SUCK MAN!"

No, I do not suck man.

[misc029a]

Desertphile,

I agree that the leftside must equal the right side of the energy equation. I must admit I am skeptic of these "magnetic perpetual machine folks, because thare is no such thing. However, if we consider the lost of inherent magnetism of the magnets involved, that would be a conversion of potential energy into kenetic. What values involved? You guess is better than mine. Loss of magnetisim of the 'permenant' magnets is a '-' energy that could go toward maintaining motion.

[Desertphile]

"However, if we consider the lost of inherent magnetism of the magnets involved, that would be a conversion of potential energy into kenetic."

Part One: Howdy! Magnetism is a physical phenomenon, (electromagnetism), i.e., one of the four forces. Everything that contain electrons have magnetic fields, but in most objects the electric charges cancel each other out because electron spin is randomly distributed: in ferrous metals that is not the case, and the electrons spin in the same direction.

[Desertphile]

Part Two: Magnetic fields "wear out" because the electrons slowly drift from alignment to non-alignment over the span of a great many years. It is not a loss of "energy" that causes a magnet's field to degrease: it's a loss of electron alignment. One way to cause a magnet to lose its magnetic field is to heat the magnet red hot: that jumbles the alignment of the electrons, randomizing alignment.

[misc029a]

Part I: I do not know about the cause of magnetism. However, I believe that the fact the the electrons are not randomised in a magnetic object (as you stated) would indicate that some Potential Energy is contained in the object. The release of that energy would lower the "Power" or "Force" of the overall magnetic field of the object.

[misc029a]

Part II: This could be demonstrated by thinking of "Height" as a potential engery when gravity is involved the same way as magnetic force is an attractant or a repellent where other magnetic fields or magnetically sensitive objects are involved. HOWEVER, these "magnetic motors" do seem to be a hoax at this time. People should remember that ALL electric motors are "magnetic" whether they use permanent magnets or electrically induced ones...

(I wonder how many people read this whole thing.)

[xrayrep]

I totally agree with WHAT this guy said, but now HOW he said it. He could have said exactly the same thing without resorting to profanity. Oh, one more comment..... I totally disagree with him wanting to smoke a cigarette. YUCK!!!!

[byjoveoldchap]

You are a real life ignoramous and a foul mouthed one at that! Go amd stick your head in that stuff your bulls left behind and stop bleating your bull sh-t nonsense. Get a brain cell and see what a difference it could do for you!

[Desertphile]

"You are a real life ignoramous and a foul mouthed one at that!"

Did you see any errors in this video? If so perhaps you would be kind enough to point them out to me so that I may be corrected. Thank you.

[ptatom]

Alright dumb-bo. At one time you might have known some things but are now out of practice. The extra energy comes from the stored energy or magnetic force emitted from the magnets. If you factor in the repulsion energy from the magnets you will see that there is no magic going on. A person can really put in a small about of energy and get out more (because the repulsion forces are making up the difference).

[Desertphile]

"The extra energy comes from the stored energy or magnetic force emitted from the magnets"

No.

[ptatom]

"No." That's it? Yes! There is no magic. The energy is in the form of a waves with the strength being inversely related to the square of the distance from the magnet. When the magnetic field comes in contact with, say, an electron rich coil of wire, those waves bump electrons from the coil causing a cascade of electrons in motion...i.e. current.

[Desertphile]

""No." That's it? Yes! There is no magic. The energy is in the form of a waves with the strength being inversely related to the square of the distance from the magnet."

Yes, the correct answer to your false statement is "No." Magnetic fields do not contain energy.

[sk8tergirl112]

Hmm, While the content of your video MAY be technically correct, you did little service to the status of your intellect by inclusion of profanity. Which speaks to the core of the matter - that of a closed mind. I would repeat what I said with smaller words for you, but I really don't care if you understand or not.

[PScottrwp]

hi dave, phil again, from your ars days.. re the bull manure, you can dry it out and smoke it, burn it or put put it in an enclosed space and gather the methane... you knew that of course.

[mejc2]

I've always thought of hydro and wind as free. I don't understand why we don't have like a billion wind mills all over the country. How about using the steam from the giesers at yellowstone. isn't that free. we have more free steam than any other place in the world. Why does an oil company hold the patents on the EV1 Battery design that is just wrong. How stupid are WE. I know more energy goes into a wind mill than comes out but isn't wind free and virtually inexhaustable?

[theoriginalSkooby]

'we have more free steam'

I pretty sure that Iceland holds that title.

'more energy goes into a wind mill'

Nope. If that were true they wouldn't make them. The energy payback is probably less than three years. The reason wind, hydro and solar are not free is because they take time to pay off. You cannot plug into them without up front costs. The reason we don't have a billion of them is because everyone would bitch if they had to pay more on their bill aka shortsightedness.

[Desertphile]

"You cannot plug into them without up front costs."

That is very well-said. Some time soon I hope to make a video on the subject. Solar power, wind power, water power--- they are all extremely expensive. Hell, maybe I can do a "quickie" video on the subject....

[Desertphile]

"Why does an oil company hold the patents on the EV1 Battery design that is just wrong."

You are right--- it is not criminal for Big Money to suppress the opposition, but some times I think it ought to be. The chief problem with power from wind, sun, water, alcohol, and steam is that it costs a large bundle of money; it can be a decade or longer before it all pays for itself in savings compared to oil, after which time it must all be replaced due to wear and tear. A video shall I make!

[Bradford1966]

I think if you open the curtains behind you we'll see a city street

[BallinMafia]

You mean the bed sheets.

[Desertphile]

"I think if you open the curtains behind you we'll see a city street"

ROTFL! That's *GREAT!* Good bloody GODS I wish I had thought of that! It's so funny! Thank you--- I wish I had a cityscape backdrop to add behind me. Where does one even go to get one?

[lazerboy86]

why dont u open the curtains behind you

and let us see for us self .......

[Bradford1966]

Can we see the bulls?

[Desertphile]

"Can we see the bulls?"

I tried to video them but their ID tags are clearly visible--- I have not used the video due to privacy issues. Tomorrow I will again go video El Toro Solo here in the upper corral: he's back!

[NoWattz]

An observation I'd like to share:

Out of all the topics you've addressed, it appears to me that there is nothing that irritates you more than the subject of "free energy"(or the twits that believe in it)

Just sit back, have a drink, and put your faith in the laws of physics to teach all of them what they refuse to acknowledge,,,REALITY!! Speaking personally, I've become fond of Free Energy clips n' vid.s. They're almost always good for a chuckle.

[dechha1981]

There is a guy who claims that you can travel through time using a tunnel full of lazers bouncing off mirrors. But you don't seen him whining about how he doesn't have a patent yet because he KNOWS he won't get a patent untill he can get the damn thing to actually work.

[NomadSoul76]

"There is a guy who claims that you can travel through time using a tunnel full of lazers bouncing off mirrors"

The concept appears to be sound, but it's based on unproven hypotheses at this point. Gravity probe B was supposed to test the concept of frame drag, but the last I heard it was running into problems.

But yes, your point is valid. It's a clever idea, but it doesn't appear to have been made to work yet. And no one is trying to claim otherwise.

[dustynbones]

The only thing that a magnetic motor is.

It's a gyroscope.

[Cab0cl0]

Free energy, lol.

[anmoose]

I'm sending you a cigarette. :-P

Moosie

[philip1201]

I've got an idea. (it probably is flawed in some way but i don't know why).

Get a thin straw. Put it in a layer of water in such a way that the straw's lowest opening isn't blocked. Bend the straw downward and place a small waterwheel below the opening. The adhesion pulls the water up and gravity pulls it down against the waterwheel. The waterwheel starts spinning and you can get some energy.

Where's the flaw in this?

[smaakjeks]

"Where's the flaw in this?"

Capillary adhesion is limited by gravity. You have to have the straw be short enough to bend down before the gravitational force becomes too great. Then it is merely the adhesion action and not gravity that runs the device. In essense nothing is wrong with that, but it's not free energy. The hydrogen bonds of water molecules don't spontaneously appear from nowhere. Also, the energy collected from such a device would be infinitesimal.

[philip1201]

So where does the energy in the hydogen bonds come from? Will it get colder?

And the amount of energy does not matter: any positive number is illegal, no matter how small.

[smaakjeks]

"So where does the energy in the hydogen bonds come from? Will it get colder?"

They come from the energy needed to fuse hydrogen particles with atomic oxygen. Heat would not be lost, no.

"And the amount of energy does not matter: any positive number is illegal, no matter how small."

This would not create energy. It would only take advantage of it. WE get more energy. The universe does not. But now that I think again, I guess the water would just cling to the top of the straw, and not drip off.

[philip1201]

But hydrolysis REQUIRES energy, and H2+O -> H20 is an exotermic process.

oh...

[smaakjeks]

"But hydrolysis REQUIRES energy"

H2+O -> H20 is not hydrolysis. Hydrolysis is a process whereupon substances get water molecules added (to break these substances down). I'm assuming that our water comes from supernovas, where H+ can be found and bonded with. But I don't know this.

"and H2+O -> H20 is an exotermic process."

Okay, but what is your point? I thought you asked if exploiting hydrogen bonds will make the system lose heat. We are assuming that water is already there, right?

[philip1201]

What do you call water splitting into H2 and O? Because that's what i meant.

Hydrogen-oxygen bonds are low-energy, that's why it requires energy to break them.

[smaakjeks]

"What do you call water splitting into H2 and O? Because that's what i meant."

Water can be split by means of electrolysis.

[philip1201]

thanks.

But the energy from the adhesion comes from what? Not the bonds between H and O because those REQUIRE energy to break.

[smaakjeks]

"But the energy from the adhesion comes from what? Not the bonds between H and O because those REQUIRE energy to break."

Hydrogen bonds. We're not breaking up H+ and O when water adheres to a surface. It's still water, but water is a dipole, and the molecules of the straw are electrically charged, either positive or negative. I suggest you look up adhesion and cohesion in wikipedia for more details.

[philip1201]

Thanks.

[isreasontaboo]

Hi Desert, why are you still wasting your energy (pun intended!) on those ignorants. You and me both know what thermodynamics Ist & IInd law actually mean but debating those people (who often block reasonable comments that hurt their beliefs) is about as useful as attempting to convince a creationist that he is delusional, no matter how much evidence you throw at them.

[Erech01]

he is an IDIOT hasnt he hear of basic physics, you cant just create energy from nothing what he is trying to do is by definition, IMPOSSIBLE, usually id say improbable, but no, this IS impossible, if anyone could create a device which has a higher 'power out' than 'power in' they would be a nobel prize winner and become a billionairre over night-.-

[arkivx1]

Thermodynamics FTW!!!

[carnut666]

I think if these guys want free(technically cheap i guess) energy they should just hook up an exercycle to a generator and a big battery and there you go, you've got free energy, a good work out and you're helping the environment : ).

[nekedemus]

Dos not apply to my wife.

The less energy I put in the household the more steam she puts out.

[isreasontaboo]

"Dos not apply to my wife.

The less energy I put in the household the more steam she puts out."

ROTFLMAO

[nicanicabad]

lol

[bpabbott1st]

If a magnetic field could produce energy ... the gravitational field of the earth would be profoundly more effective! ;-)

[keithrockerboblewis]

LOL - "Now I need a cigarette."

[lordbeanz]

Lol. Cant quite set them straight can you. I think we should focus on improving our solar panels to better collect the sun rays. So Mr. D what is your solution to the worlds energy crisis. One that might be within reason. Not everyone can be happy with no electricity.

[Desertphile]

"So Mr. D what is your solution to the worlds energy crisis."

1) Have much fewer people in the world.

2) Have much less manufacturing of crap nobody actually needs: this means adults must grow up and only purchase what they need, not what they want at the moment.

3) Ban the production of plastic except for when necessary in technologies that absolutely require it.

4) Ban superfluous lighting such as one sees in Las Vegas, Nevada.

[IGExpandingPanda]

A big step would be addressing lighting. incandescent lamps suck power (15 lumens/watt) and burn out after 1000 or so hours. CFL, LED, plasma are all legit options.

[mobiltec]

"I think we should focus on improving our solar panels to better collect the sun rays."

Why not just put solar panels under a tanning bed and you get all the free energy you want and never have to worry about the sun going down...

[lordbeanz]

lol. and whats powering those beds again huh?

[SciFientology]

amen!

[soulinite]

great video!

[TrueNorth15]

if his machine worked like he claims then he should be able to unplug the external power and have it feed into itself, but he won't because it is a load of BS

[Edella]

Connect the output of an over unity device to its input? Are you crazy? The feedback loop would rip asunder the very fabric of the universe! ;)

[TrueNorth15]

it is disturbing that the fabric of the universe is like cheap linens, I would expect it to be more like denim

[hellshade2]

what do you call a herd of bulls masturbating?

beef strokingoff :D

[theoriginalSkooby]

I get the same kind of relief when I debate my local nuts here in Utah. All the DNA in the America's is not enough to convince a mormon that they believe in a fiction. But I always feel better after taking them to task anyway.

[soulinite]

you are planting seads my friend.

[mikemikemofo]

mmmmmm, range blocks

[Desertphile]

"mmmmmm, range blocks"

Mighty tasty when you have four stomaches!

[999VINCENT666]

lol, ideea

[Desertphile]

"lol, ideea"

Hee hee! At least it wasn't "Idear."