I agree with you that the Higgs field does not seem to explain the distribution of matter in the universe, unless you believe the higgs fields are distributed using a cellular automata algorithm, CA. Suppose a simple CA can be used to explain the symetery and distribution of matter than you have the problem of an "infinite source" for the higgs field. All the other forces have a finite source. If one accepts and infinite source than there is no end to matter and energy in the Universe.
@davepamn I have not been able to push my work into cosmology yet. I have not become a convert to cellular automata. Will have to see what the future brings.
@davepamn The theory is getting hammered on the blog Science20. I presumed local gauge symmetry, but was unable to show it. I have to see if I can come up with a new approach that makes clearer statements about technical issues. Right now, I have nothing. Theoretical physics is harsh!
@TheStringtheorysucks I work with these numbers on a particular "support", a fancy way of saying particular numbers are excluded. The inverse of the hypercomplex/Study/Klein 4-group has as its divisor the product of 4 Eigenvalues of the 4x4 matrix representation. So long as NONE of those eigenvalues are zero, then an inverse will necessarily exist. "True" division algebras exclude all of one set of values, where all = 0. The excluded set for hypercomplex numbers is well defined. I like em :-)
@TheStringtheorysucks I did a Google search, but all I got was numerology and Biblical crap. I dusted off EDM2, the Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, but "study numbers" was not in the index. Do you have a reference?
I'll wager that you 'subconsciously' mixed up the notion of Lorentz gauge with the coupled wave equation, del^2A - d^2phi/dt^2. After all, you do play with minus signs...A lot! (just as Maxwell did)
The magnetic monopoles reasearch news reported in the press do not mean that del . B = 0 is not true, what one normally means by magnetic monopole. Instead what experimentalist found was a funky state of flux tubes in a lattice that has some similarities to a magnetic monopole. This is a solid state phenomena, not a challenge to the equations on the t-shirt. Wikipedia has a description of the issue.
I agree with you that the Higgs field does not seem to explain the distribution of matter in the universe, unless you believe the higgs fields are distributed using a cellular automata algorithm, CA. Suppose a simple CA can be used to explain the symetery and distribution of matter than you have the problem of an "infinite source" for the higgs field. All the other forces have a finite source. If one accepts and infinite source than there is no end to matter and energy in the Universe.
davepamn 3 months ago
The big bang would need to step down and an uniform expansion of the Universe from an infinite source would need to replace the theory.
davepamn 3 months ago
@davepamn I have not been able to push my work into cosmology yet. I have not become a convert to cellular automata. Will have to see what the future brings.
sweetser 2 months ago
You seem to have proved that symmetry and conservation of charge particles works. Did you disprove the higgs field and the boson mass emergence?
davepamn 3 months ago
@davepamn The theory is getting hammered on the blog Science20. I presumed local gauge symmetry, but was unable to show it. I have to see if I can come up with a new approach that makes clearer statements about technical issues. Right now, I have nothing. Theoretical physics is harsh!
sweetser 3 months ago
@TheStringtheorysucks I work with these numbers on a particular "support", a fancy way of saying particular numbers are excluded. The inverse of the hypercomplex/Study/Klein 4-group has as its divisor the product of 4 Eigenvalues of the 4x4 matrix representation. So long as NONE of those eigenvalues are zero, then an inverse will necessarily exist. "True" division algebras exclude all of one set of values, where all = 0. The excluded set for hypercomplex numbers is well defined. I like em :-)
sweetser 1 year ago
@TheStringtheorysucks I did a Google search, but all I got was numerology and Biblical crap. I dusted off EDM2, the Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, but "study numbers" was not in the index. Do you have a reference?
Thanks,
Doug
sweetser 1 year ago
Doug, the Lorentz gauge is the sum of del A and d phi dt equals zero, not their difference.
69erthx1138 2 years ago
You are correct. I will see if I can edit the sound track.
sweetser 2 years ago
I'll wager that you 'subconsciously' mixed up the notion of Lorentz gauge with the coupled wave equation, del^2A - d^2phi/dt^2. After all, you do play with minus signs...A lot! (just as Maxwell did)
69erthx1138 2 years ago
You are funny, I love your videos.
dtman83 2 years ago
did you know the magnetic monopole has been found?
time to re-examine maxwell's original equations containing them. :)
crippled82 2 years ago
Hello:
The magnetic monopoles reasearch news reported in the press do not mean that del . B = 0 is not true, what one normally means by magnetic monopole. Instead what experimentalist found was a funky state of flux tubes in a lattice that has some similarities to a magnetic monopole. This is a solid state phenomena, not a challenge to the equations on the t-shirt. Wikipedia has a description of the issue.
sweetser 2 years ago
thanks for clearing up
crippled82 2 years ago