Unsafe under Republicans

[JOJO771980]

screw john mcain..hes a typical asshole that just tells stories and dosent get right to the point...and im glad that he didnt get elected..he dosent deserve to be in office...

[JOJO771980]

DEMOCRACY rules..REPUBLIC sucks...and i mean that literally.

[ErDanGill]

After four years of this guy, that retards like you elected, I can't wait to start pointing the fingers back at you liberal shmucks.

What an IDIOT

[lj4adotcomdan]

Well, I guess we will have to just wait and see. I have more faith in Obama than you do. I guess that is why I voted for him and you did not.

Funny how that works.

[JOJO771980]

@ErDanGill... scrrew you repub scumbag..SCUMBAGGGGGGGG!!..thi­s is how you treat your fellow american that care so much about this country other than you..typical POS you are...you know who you actually voted for???do you???do you even care about america???...i cant believe you got brainwashed of the so-called republicans that you think they will serve you...but they wont...you just voted for curruption aginst the middleclass..

[JOJO771980]

@ErDanGill .. let the truth be told you typical POS... this man on video here is saying what needs to be said..and if you dont like it.. oh f...well you loser...this is democracy..the land of the truth not lies. whatever you got your info from..must be from a typical lying repub you listen too huh???? if that is so... you shouldnt even talk to us... your aginst us... be gone..

[skyezdlimit]

Geez how do you deal with all these idiots insulting you?? lol I enjoyed your video very much and agree with you in alot of what you said.

[lj4adotcomdan]

I laugh at them. I find them very amusing actually. :)

[MeanMajic]

I turned you off within that first 2mins. It's a shame you have no clue what so ever.

[lj4adotcomdan]

It is a shame really, it gets good around 3:45. You might have learned something... but I doubt you really wanted to.

[rahtool]

We had no business in Irag in the first place. Where we need our forces is back in Afghanistan. It's not only AlQaeda that is getting stronger but also the Taliban. Federally Administered Tribal Areas are sanctuaries for the two groups. We should be concentrating on renforcing our troops in Afghanistan. This is where the real fight is.

[lj4adotcomdan]

If it was not an insult they why was it relevant to the discussion?

Yes, gay people are mostly liberal. Perhaps it is because Democrats are more likely to defend their civil rights.

I have plenty of reasons to vote for Obama. I suggest watching my 40+ videos I have posted so far on this election.

And most waiters I know would qualify for a tax cut under Obama's plan. However, the CEO who would get a $70K tax break under McCain while the middle class struggles, would not get one under Obama

[lj4adotcomdan]

I am pretty sure you are an idiot, that would explain your response. And it is a shame that you feel that calling someone a "homosexual" is an insult.

And a self proclaimed "lover of language" should be able to come up with a more original comeback then "you are gay".

Obama produced the certificate of live birth, something that even conservative websites and pundits have verified as being valid.

But hey, keep on making posts like these, it only serves to hurt McCain.

[eWarren19842008]

What an unfortunate waste of time and energy.

[eWarren19842008]

How can you say that John McCain isn't truefull? Obama won't even tell you where he stands. Because of a bunch of IGNORANT people like you this country is going to the pot. Obama don't stand anywhere he voted "present" how many times in the senate and on what important issues? He condons partial birth abortions which is a form of legalized murder.And you and a bunch of liberal hippies and uneducated people are voteing for a DEMOSTIC TERRORIST.I just hope and pray that he isn't elected president!

[lj4adotcomdan]

How can I say McCain is not truthful? Just look at his repeated lies about Obama!

Obama has a website where he tells you his position on many issues.

Obama only rejected the ban on partial birth abortions because the legislation did not allow a woman to save her life and he felt that Illinois had laws on the books that already covered it.

No, I am not voting for a Domestic Terrorist. I am voting for the best candidate in this election, Barack Obama. I hope your prayers are unanswered.

[eWarren19842008]

If Obama is so clear on where he stands why wont he let the people see his birth certificate. why wont he tell the american people up front that he is trying to ban hunting rifels and ammo and tax them higher than they have ever ben before. UP FRONT; I DON'T THINK SO!! I don't know what presidental debate that you watched but all Obama could do was talk about was failed Bush polices. Maybe you should look up ATLAHWorldwide on youtube, Pastor Manning can help you understand Obama and his people.

[lj4adotcomdan]

The birth certificate case was tossed for having no merit.

Obama was born in Hawaii. That makes him a US citizen.

[astrocreep5ooo]

So let me get this right, you think we should leave Iraq because Bush said we have already won there ? Well just let me tell you the work there is not done. If we leave now, we leave a country in turmoil. This would be very bad for not only us but the entire world. And let me just ask how long you served your country. I think there are a lot more issues to worry about with Mr Obama then just Iraq. Like his cousin Odinga in Kenya who lost his election. Know what he did ? Google him and find out.

[lj4adotcomdan]

No, I think we should leave Iraq when Iraq is ready to defend itself.

I think that it is silly to say that anyone wants to lose in Iraq when those same people have said we already won.

And I fact checked Odinga and the claims made about Obama's connection to him are false.

But to bring the discussion back on point... how can you feel safe under Republicans when under Republicans al queda has strengthened?

[applezareblue]

PRE 911 LEVELS, PRE 911 LEVELS. BLAH BLAH.

so we can't prove that the troop serge worked but we can prove al qaeda is back to pre 911 levels huh? how convenient. also, zzzzzzzz. time table isn't obama's idea. that's a laugh.

[lj4adotcomdan]

If the fact that Al Queda has reached levels unseen since 9/11 doesn't concern you then you really need to sit back and reexamine some priorities.

Between the ethnic cleansing and changed tactics, it is impossible to know whether the increase in troop levels had any meaningful impact. However, by looking at their activity you can clearly see if Al Queda is stronger than it was before.

And while the time table may not belong to Obama, he embraces it and that is a good thing.

[applezareblue]

buddy, tons of people support a time table, you act like obama is alone in that. the problem is, if you set a time table and you don't reach the needed results to implement it, you don't go ahead with it anyway. example: do you retire at 60 if the stock market is doing crappy and you can't afford to anymore based on your investments... buuut you had a time table to do it (boy that sounds familiar)? no you don't, you suck it up and keep working.

[lj4adotcomdan]

You make a good point.

However, if you believe that Obama would just ignore conditions on the ground and not adapt to them then you are fooling yourself.

The key to a timetable is setting a goal. If you have to adjust it towards the end then so be it. But at least you are looking forward to a goal.

[applezareblue]

Bush HAS implemented timetables, obviously adjusting them as time has passed. And if what you are suggesting about al qaeda activity is true, there should not be major withdrawal of troops. There is nothing new to be brought to the timetable idea but suggesting that there be a binding one with no questions asked. that's the only new thing to assume obama will add to the mix when bringing up the topic of timetables. I'm not even a bush fan per say, but damn.

[lj4adotcomdan]

Bush and Republicans have rejected timetables over and over.

It is not I who suggests that Al Queda has reached strengths not seen since 9/11. Our own government has said that.

Obama will send troops to Afghanistan to deal with the Al Queda threats.

And what is "new" is setting a goal for their troops to be ready to defend themselves.

[vancecook7]

Public timetables would be the same as broadcasting troop movements to the enemy. If there are to be timetables it shouldn't be announced. That's the flaw in all the timetable arguments.

[lj4adotcomdan]

It absolutely is not the same.

If we have a timetable where we would withdraw from Iraq BECAUSE we have trained and equipped the people in Iraq to defend themselves, then all that tells the enemy is that the people killing them now will be Iraqi citizens and not American citizens.

[vancecook7]

You certainly have a point. I'm not saying you don't. But if you are honest with yourself, you will realize that I have a point, too. Announced timetables will allow the enemy to change their tactics in a way that will be able to give them an edge because as you say at the beginning, our troops are well trained, and soldiers from other countries may not be able to absorb the information according to some arbitrary time-table based on our own standards.

[lj4adotcomdan]

I have faith in the ability of our soldiers, and those who teach our soldiers to be the best soldiers that they can be, to train the Iraqi people to be the best soldiers that they can be.

And those Iraqi soldiers will have the best motivation in the world. Freedom.

And our soldiers will have the best motivation to accomplish the task... both the ability to see their families more often and the knowledge that they will be sent after Al Queda, the real enemy who attacked us on 9.11

[vancecook7]

As do I.

What I don't have faith in is unforeseen circumstance.

And... once again... advertised troop movements is tactically wrong. The public doesn't need to know how many and when. As a veteran, it ticks me off to no end when this sort of information gets broadcast for political purpose because it puts our troops in jeopardy.

And that is no lie, nor a fear tactic.

[RapidRoulete]

The thing is, you are just not as attractive as "Military Wife" - those big blue eyes, the way she goes from happy to sad would melt anyones heart! Therefore the chances of you winning this arguement by logic are, frankly, nil.

[lj4adotcomdan]

LOL

Though I do agree, she is far more attractive than I. However, I have faith that there are people who will judge the arguments on their merit.

[emmagurliiie]

OBAMA! GO OBAMA!!! YAY!!!

[greentiger1775]

Go see for yourself if your so sure about your position. Anyone whose been there between 05 and now will tell you the surge was needed and worked. Your wrong about Obama - your kids and grandkids will be back there again and again and again. It's called an away Game - we fought people from 38countries who came to Iraq to fight Americans. Her husband has the target on his back. Abandon Iraq - it will turn into pre-911 Afghanistan on steroids and be worse than the killing fields.

[lj4adotcomdan]

Actually a report came out saying that the reason for the drop in sectarian violence was ethnic cleansing. The people are not dying because they are not there anymore.

And again, a change in strategy took place and it very well could have been that, and not the increase in troops, that helped in certain matters.

However, at the end of the day, Obama made the right decision day 1 in opposing the Iraq war. He said it would distract us from al queda. It did. That is the mark of a true leader.

[bjsh55]

O B A M A!!!!!!!!!!1

[Cutlasson13s]

Totally agree thats all their is to say.

[VanessaBarrera]

Agreed.

I do not understand why republicans keep saying this war is for our freedom.

What does our freedom have to do with the war?

Evidently they believed all the lies Bush, McCain and their administration have given them.

Most Americans are brainwashed.

Brainwashed or just too damn ignorant!

That's why I'm voting for Obama!

[vicdeluca71]

Think about this.Why is that most of the people who support this ocupation have not been involved (fought).Why did so many of the troops support Ron Paul? he voted against this war.Semper fi!!!

[lj4adotcomdan]

The two candidates who got the most campaign donations from our troops were Obama and Ron Paul.

Unfortunately we have to deal with people like Sonny who have blinders on and refuse to see the truth. They stick their fingers in their ears when you provide a reasonable argument and all they have to rebut with is an insult.

It is pathetic really, and it is a shame that this is what the Republican party has come down to. There are still some good ones, unfortunately the morons drown them out.

[vicdeluca71]

YES!Insults are all they have.Thats it!!.They can't argue like real men....Even the average guy like my can see throught this apparent propaganda bullshit....

[sonny134679]

Hey fatass stick to what you know about fast food and donuts Leave the real decisions and fighting to the real men Just remember

Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.

[lj4adotcomdan]

Oh no, a fat comment? I am so hurt... boo frickin' hoo. I mean seriously, I love when the idiots come on and respond by calling me fat. I will give you a hint sonny. If your point of view was correct, you wouldn't have to resort to name calling.

I love our Military. They deserve nothing but respect and support (including an administration that doesn't consider healthcare for vets as "pork")

Perhaps you like the fact that Osama is still alive. Maybe thats it. Get a life and a clue.

Obama 2008

[happytobeproud]

sonny you are a FAG. Are u a marine, have you lost anyone you love in the war. Most likly no. So shut the fuck up about anything having to do with US Marines, because if you actually Know some one that has served, they will gladly tell you that NO THEY DONT WANT TO BE THERE. This is a useless war, while america keeps sinking deeper and deeper. What has the BUSH administration done for us common americans. Besides spinning all there Bullshit. You are just another blind sheep.

[IonicStormFront]

Blah, blah, blah...stfu

[krazyblakk]

no i was saying the dems act like they can't bring up certian things like him being a pow

[lj4adotcomdan]

The problem is that the Republicans want to frame the debate as McCain = war hero so McCain is better on terrorism. I say, its better to focus on Republicans = higher al queda strength than 9/11 so Republicans are weaker on terrorism.

[HiveRadical]

What if tactics were, which they likely were, tied troop levels?

[lj4adotcomdan]

I have seen nothing that states we needed the extra troops to change those tactics. Even if so, that was only a minor portion of my comment about McCain and why we are weaker under Republicans.

[krazyblakk]

mcfake why does'nt us dems just hammer mccain.and stop being cowards fuck who cares about him pow?. that was 30+ years ago. there were alot of alot of pows. in nam in iraq in almost every war the us has entered. does that mean all them are ready to be Prez?

[lj4adotcomdan]

Where did I mention his being a POW? I fully support going after McCain, his policies and his record. Republicans do worse to us.