Sorry for not being able to understand Spanish but I think you forwarded that gasoline engines would do better. İf so I agree with you however my preference is to use the gasoline engines on larger scales i.e. over 1.20 size models otherwise 4c glows also have the advantage of the realistic engine sound which I love to hear.
Salu e buenos vuelos (I might have written somthing wrong!!!)
My thoughts were the same except for the fact that I have the same plane and i had a 125 Saito but ended up with a webra 120 2 stroke on mine. I like the 2 better but it is up to the individual on how they like the way it sounds and whether you want more torque or more speed and top end. The Saito sounds better of course but there just is no comparison on how this plane fly's with the Webra 2 stroke.
Hello, I have the same airplane and same configuration. I would just like to know how is the Center of Gravity (CG) from your airplane...I just cant hover my....I appreciate your flight!
The default CG for this plane is 120mm from the leading edge of the wing just proximal to the fusulage. Maybe some adjustments towards the tail to make it a little bit tail heavy is necessary for hovering.
The default CG for this plane is 120mm from the leading edge of the wing just proximal to the fusulage. Maybe some adjustments towards the tail to make it a little bit tail heavy is necessary for hovering.
hola, yo tengo un OS-75, con este motor no podria hacer Torque Roll no?, es muy chico?, me digieron que es casi como el 91, o estoy equivocado?, la ventaja que pesa como un 60 pero con mas fuerza. que opina al respecto?
Hello, I have an airplane same like yours, with the same engine, but i am using a 13x10 propeller, and i can't do torque roll, what propeller are you using?
¿Solamente torque roll (bastante buenos en todo caso)? Pues me parece un vuelo "limitado". El torque roll es solo una pequeña parte del real vuelo 3D. ¡Vamos, queremos ver filos de cuchilla, rolling harriers, etc!
Hola! este avión no es un 3d, las maniobras que tu dices de hacer es practicamente imposible con ese avión, encima era el primer modelo que saco el segundo vuela mejor. Tengo otro video con el yak 54, en videos escribe" sevilla4c", un saludo
Vi tu video del Yak. Hermosos filos de cuchilla, y buen dominio, tal cual como el Extra, en el torque roll. Sinceramente no me gusta tu rolling harrier, creo que sale como muy "cortado". En general estas volando bastante bien!
Gracias. Pensando que voy a comprar el Fliton Extra 330s con un Saito 100. Le dicen que lo vuela el mas mejor de los extras pequenos. Gracias por tu responden.
Comment removed
baytacoglu 1 year ago
Comment removed
baytacoglu 1 year ago
Comment removed
baytacoglu 1 year ago
Comment removed
baytacoglu 1 year ago
Sorry for not being able to understand Spanish but I think you forwarded that gasoline engines would do better. İf so I agree with you however my preference is to use the gasoline engines on larger scales i.e. over 1.20 size models otherwise 4c glows also have the advantage of the realistic engine sound which I love to hear.
Salu e buenos vuelos (I might have written somthing wrong!!!)
baytacoglu 1 year ago
This type of aircraft deserves 4C engines in my opinion.
My belief is 1.20 4c OSm or 1.25 Saito would suit better.
Thanks for sharing the video.
baytacoglu 1 year ago
Pueder ser, yo en ese momento solo tenia ese motor, ahora vuelo aviones mas grandes y de gasolina, salu2
sevilla4c 1 year ago
@baytacoglu
My thoughts were the same except for the fact that I have the same plane and i had a 125 Saito but ended up with a webra 120 2 stroke on mine. I like the 2 better but it is up to the individual on how they like the way it sounds and whether you want more torque or more speed and top end. The Saito sounds better of course but there just is no comparison on how this plane fly's with the Webra 2 stroke.
dmoody101 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This type of aircraft deserves 4C engines in my opinion.
My belief is 1.20 4c OSm or 1.25 Saito would suit better.
Thanks for sharing the video.
baytacoglu 1 year ago
This type of aircraft deserves 4C engines in my opinion.
My belief is 1.20 4c OSm or 1.25 Saito would suit better.
Thanks for sharing the video.
baytacoglu 1 year ago
This type of aircraft deserves 4C engines in my opinion.
My belief is 1.20 4c OSm or 1.25 Saito would suit better.
Thanks for sharing the video.
baytacoglu 1 year ago
Hello, I have the same airplane and same configuration. I would just like to know how is the Center of Gravity (CG) from your airplane...I just cant hover my....I appreciate your flight!
andremp9 1 year ago
Hola!, Saludo El Centro de Gravedad lo Llevo retrasado, Entre 1,5 y 2 cmts, de lo indicado en El Plano, sin
CBDavid14 1 year ago
@andremp9
The default CG for this plane is 120mm from the leading edge of the wing just proximal to the fusulage. Maybe some adjustments towards the tail to make it a little bit tail heavy is necessary for hovering.
Regards
Barlas
baytacoglu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@andremp9
The default CG for this plane is 120mm from the leading edge of the wing just proximal to the fusulage. Maybe some adjustments towards the tail to make it a little bit tail heavy is necessary for hovering.
Regards
Barlas
baytacoglu 1 year ago
Comment removed
baytacoglu 1 year ago
hola tengo uno igual pero con motor OS 120 ¿que propela me recomiendas?
selemx 1 year ago
Que tal con que helice estas volando este avion???
Saludos desde Mexico
armandosantac 2 years ago
Apc 15X4, saludos y Os 91 FX
sevilla4c 2 years ago
Ok gracias, esta bien el video, Felicidades!!!!
Saludos
armandosantac 2 years ago
hola, yo tengo un OS-75, con este motor no podria hacer Torque Roll no?, es muy chico?, me digieron que es casi como el 91, o estoy equivocado?, la ventaja que pesa como un 60 pero con mas fuerza. que opina al respecto?
walalberto 2 years ago
con un ASP 108 que opinas?, con el OS-120 le quedaria pesada la trompa. o no?
walalberto 2 years ago
@walalberto el 120 es muy ligero yo lo he volado con ese motor y con el 91
sevilla4c 2 years ago
Comment removed
walalberto 2 years ago
Hola, como vuela este avion, que esperiencia tenes?, le iria bien un OS-91 pata 3D? o que me recoemndas vos? saludos!!
walalberto 2 years ago
Con el 91 ira bien, pero con el 120 mejor.
Natafan1 2 years ago
whats your aile rudder, and elevator rates and expo
Abarron1000 2 years ago
Compra um simulador meu filho kkkkkkkkkkkk...
Brenoshop 2 years ago
i just bought this baby today from tower i am putting a 0s .91 fx with ds821 servos god i hope i make it past the maiden
lilshittyhunt 2 years ago
Man our club would send you PACKING! for leaving the flight line.
RedCb28 3 years ago
get a life. guy's got skills!
BRC450 3 years ago
Muy bueno tio¡
polivalvula 3 years ago
I will try the OS 75 AX with this plane. What would you say about that ? Saludos
igehring 3 years ago
Hola! para un vuelo normal el OS 75 ira bien, pero para 3D seria poco motor. Un saludo
sevilla4c 3 years ago
hum ... but the 75ax has the same power as a regular 90, and I see you´re using a 90
igehring 3 years ago
Mira la página de OS, el 91 tiene 2,8 y el 75 tiene 2,4
sevilla4c 3 years ago
It´s true... thanks !
igehring 3 years ago
Hello, I have an airplane same like yours, with the same engine, but i am using a 13x10 propeller, and i can't do torque roll, what propeller are you using?
andremp09 3 years ago
Hi I use the APC 15X4, you need a lot of little step and shovel, a greeting
sevilla4c 3 years ago
¿Solamente torque roll (bastante buenos en todo caso)? Pues me parece un vuelo "limitado". El torque roll es solo una pequeña parte del real vuelo 3D. ¡Vamos, queremos ver filos de cuchilla, rolling harriers, etc!
APaivaM 3 years ago
Hola! este avión no es un 3d, las maniobras que tu dices de hacer es practicamente imposible con ese avión, encima era el primer modelo que saco el segundo vuela mejor. Tengo otro video con el yak 54, en videos escribe" sevilla4c", un saludo
sevilla4c 3 years ago
Vi tu video del Yak. Hermosos filos de cuchilla, y buen dominio, tal cual como el Extra, en el torque roll. Sinceramente no me gusta tu rolling harrier, creo que sale como muy "cortado". En general estas volando bastante bien!
APaivaM 3 years ago
perfecto magnifico
badboyjuju 3 years ago
Muchas gracias, Saludos
sevilla4c 3 years ago
Como Le gusta el avion? Y la performancia con su motor? Lo siento, no hablo mucho espanol.
romeofoever 4 years ago
Hola! me gusta mas el Yak, y el motor Os 91 Fx tiraba bien de el.
sevilla4c 4 years ago
Gracias. Pensando que voy a comprar el Fliton Extra 330s con un Saito 100. Le dicen que lo vuela el mas mejor de los extras pequenos. Gracias por tu responden.
romeofoever 4 years ago
tremendo avion ese ehh aki en puerto rico tenemos dos de ellos uno con un saito 100 y el otro con un os 91 4 stroke y de veras vuela muy bn
WillyAguada 4 years ago
El yak 54 de la misma fabrica vuela mucho mejor, aquí lo puedes ver en videos escribe, sevilla4c.Saludos desde España
sevilla4c 4 years ago
what engine u useing?
AirMostafa 4 years ago
hola! motor(Engine) OS 91 FX, lo pone al principio
sevilla4c 4 years ago
whoa, no way.
FalconKPD 4 years ago