So true! I cant visually notice the difference watching a bluray on my 1080p panel between a $150 1.5m HDMI monster cable and $50 "decent" 1.5m HDMI cable.
However, not to be that guy, but efficiency is also to be considered. Attenuation can occur over long distances, so while in short distances it might not matter, over long distances, a cable that has better internal reflection and less scattering would actually work better than an inferior one. And yes, there are differences in quality for today's cables. Monster does actually shield their cables better than some other brands. Is it worth it, well... :)
actually, if you came up with a fiberoptic system that channeled the photons through de-pressurized hollow filaments or channels, it actually would be faster then current fiberoptics, since light actually moves slower through denser materials.
this system would likely require nanolathing as a tech prerequisite.
There may not be a difference in performance between the inexpensive and the expensive, but the expensive items usually have more quality parts and assembly, thus making the item more durable and thus last longer. You can replace the cheap ones several times for what you would only need to replace the expensive ones once, for example. If the cheap ones cost 1/4 of the expensive ones, and you replace the cheap ones 5 times in the lifetime of the expensive ones, the expensive ones are better.
@Foxxie0kun Most consumer electronics are made in the same factories these days. Especially with computer components. You don't always get what you pay for.
well c isn't constant (google variable speed of light).
light doesn't travel at the same speed when passing through two different obstacles so it could be a correct assumption by his customers but I doubt the difference when it comes to fiberoptics would have any effect what so ever.
@playtoyx The new 360 can't red ring at all. It only has green LEDs. That doesn't mean it can't fail, however. It hasn't been out nearly long enough to determine the failure rate.
Yeah, I love MS's little trick there and how when they said it couldn't Red Ring, they didn't mean it lost any possibility of failure, they just took out the helpful and easy-to-identify red LEDs.
One is made in America
The other is made in a sweatshop
TAKE YOUR PICK.
NickyAmerica 3 months ago
So true! I cant visually notice the difference watching a bluray on my 1080p panel between a $150 1.5m HDMI monster cable and $50 "decent" 1.5m HDMI cable.
CerberusAlliance 6 months ago
@CerberusAlliance A 1.5 meter HDMI should cost you five dollars, not fifty.
HackCausality 3 months ago
Expensive fiber cables won't make the light move faster. Just lube up the cheap ones and you'll be good to go!
kariatamun 6 months ago
He's right. I used to be a cable guy!
Argee11 7 months ago
Lol now this is why I love Mass Effect.
However, not to be that guy, but efficiency is also to be considered. Attenuation can occur over long distances, so while in short distances it might not matter, over long distances, a cable that has better internal reflection and less scattering would actually work better than an inferior one. And yes, there are differences in quality for today's cables. Monster does actually shield their cables better than some other brands. Is it worth it, well... :)
joeydestructo 7 months ago 3
actually, if you came up with a fiberoptic system that channeled the photons through de-pressurized hollow filaments or channels, it actually would be faster then current fiberoptics, since light actually moves slower through denser materials.
this system would likely require nanolathing as a tech prerequisite.
SCARREDMIND 8 months ago
@SCARREDMIND i concur
ffinfinity1 6 months ago
justin bieber.
serwet87 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@serwet87 This comment should be marked as spam
PhillyAssassinX 8 months ago
There may not be a difference in performance between the inexpensive and the expensive, but the expensive items usually have more quality parts and assembly, thus making the item more durable and thus last longer. You can replace the cheap ones several times for what you would only need to replace the expensive ones once, for example. If the cheap ones cost 1/4 of the expensive ones, and you replace the cheap ones 5 times in the lifetime of the expensive ones, the expensive ones are better.
Foxxie0kun 9 months ago
@Foxxie0kun Most consumer electronics are made in the same factories these days. Especially with computer components. You don't always get what you pay for.
jman945x 8 months ago
Lol.
snipperbes 10 months ago
"Twenty-one-eighty-three?! Why don't they just give you a slide rule and tell you to eyeball it."
xOrangeTicTacs 10 months ago 3
nigger
iugk 11 months ago
@iugk Bitch.
ZakkLamm 11 months ago
in theory this is possible
EnavSounds 11 months ago
Hahahahaha.
FrosChannel 1 year ago
well c isn't constant (google variable speed of light).
light doesn't travel at the same speed when passing through two different obstacles so it could be a correct assumption by his customers but I doubt the difference when it comes to fiberoptics would have any effect what so ever.
Nizzemancer 1 year ago
@Nizzemancer depends on the materials
nhanlm0601 1 year ago
@Nizzemancer i think its the durability not the performance
anonymous133711 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*cough* monster cables *cough cough*
cschizzlefizzle 1 year ago
Actually, cheap fiber optics probably use different material because they're so cheap, so light travels at a different speed! I am genius!
spy96 1 year ago
I love how after he says that Shepard pauses like he's thinking "FUCK you mean it doesn't?"
RyanEdge 1 year ago 4
probably a reference to HDMI cables. I store they're $40, on ebay $4. No difference
michaelraspberry 1 year ago 5
Ugh... Stop the freaking console wars...
Rave7557 1 year ago 4
PC is better.
RealGladrion 1 year ago 6
Bammmo Monster cables!
johnathonm 1 year ago
He just told the truth of our modern day products.
Ginteru 1 year ago 132
@Ginteru
Gotta love Bioware.
snoman99991 1 year ago
wow fail
tobishow 1 year ago
That's awesome.
MooseOfReason 2 years ago 44
What a smart-ass... He does have a point.
Mental note: must find a source of income to afford 360 + ME2...
amazingdany 2 years ago 2
@amazingdany get a pc. it's way better :p
ertyqwer 1 year ago
@ertyqwer I got one except it's an antiquity called Dell Dimension 2400, really slow p.o.s.
amazingdany 1 year ago
@ertyqwer Way more expensive. Taking Tali screenshots isn't worth the cost of a decent PC compared to a 360, imo.
KopperNeoman 1 year ago
@KopperNeoman there are other things you can do with a PC, you know...
ertyqwer 1 year ago 8
@amazingdany hope you didn't buy any of them yet the new xbox360 model came out less likely to red ring of death. Like my current Xbox...
playtoyx 1 year ago
@playtoyx The new 360 can't red ring at all. It only has green LEDs. That doesn't mean it can't fail, however. It hasn't been out nearly long enough to determine the failure rate.
Mynameisnotooo 1 year ago
@Mynameisnotooo
Yeah, I love MS's little trick there and how when they said it couldn't Red Ring, they didn't mean it lost any possibility of failure, they just took out the helpful and easy-to-identify red LEDs.
chargerfighter1 1 year ago