from my point of view dhali is better modern art is not as great as some realistic painting and picasso is one of those guys who used drugs to make art if someone say something about drugs just ask someone who knows what was the fav drink of picasso.absenth.on those days absenth was so strong that made picasso mad at drawing.
@AutumnSplendors MLK beat his wife, does that mean his ideas on racial equality should be discounted? Of course not. Never confuse the individual with his ideas.
This is ridiculous! Picasso could not even _understand_ differential equations, let alone work them. A total loser. What does his art do? Does it build computers? Cars? No. So stop wasting time on this charaltan.
Picasso was a phony riding a wave of public phenomena; demonstrating the falseness of academic categorization and classification. As well example of the dangers of a ego out of control. devoid of humility and perspective (no pun intended).
Picassa a inspire pas mal d'artistes semble t il. Encore une fois, quelqu'un connait il le peintre Maurice Experton dont les peintures resseblent beaucoup a du Picassa?
Si Picasso vous passionne, venez voir quelques vidéo sur ma chaîne. Cordialement.
If you are passionate about Picasso, come and see some video on my channel. Regards.
Tout ce que l’on ne voit pas sur le plateau de la Victorine de Nice - Le Mystère ! - (occulté par les diktats de Kahnweiler), est aujourd’hui mis au grand jour sur cette vidéo.
All that we do not see on the set of Victorine in Nice - The Mystery! - (Obscured by the dictates of Kahnweiler), is now brought to light on this video.
His 'ways of seeing' may not have been the most original in the world, since we know he borrowed heavily from so called primitive and tribal art, but in that getting back to basics and stripping away all the fluff he set the precedent.
The third ingredient being how prolific he was, he must have been a volcano of art for decades to produce all that he did.
@misternylon If we transform all his works in time, (hours) it would have had two lives to accomplish allhis works? A question arises: How to he done?
Si l'on transforme toutes ses oeuvres en temps passé, (en heures) il lui aurait fallu deux vies pour réaliser toutes ses oeuvres? Une question se pose: Comment à-t-il fait?
the point in art for me is emotions. i am sorry but i do not see emotions in his paintings and now seeing his process i do not see them even less. the thing i see here is clever visual play as you see him searching for what lines to add in a painting rather than having the intention of conveying emotions in the painting for the viewer to see them and feel them. i too can draw mazes of curved lines. i am sorry but this is my opinion
@cirocar "the intention of conveying emotions in the painting for the viewer to see them and feel them."
I have heard people say this about the structure and technique of Bach, and even Mozart (compared to, say, Chopin).
An emotional response to anything, art included, is not contingent upon expressive intent. Sometimes the truth of something is emotional. Sometimes just seeing another mind at work is dramatic and full of meaning. Emotive intent in art is often just the tip of the iceberg.
@iridescentsquids obviously you took my quote out of context but nonetheless. obviously anything in the world is emotional, therefore your counterargument is null. i was comparing the INTENT of CONVEYING emotions when making art to the obvious randomness/a form of child's play when drawing something(i explained it below when i said it's clear here that picasso is searching for pattern of what to draw next). and what if people said the same for bach or mozart?
@cirocar "therefore your counterargument is null."
I'm not making a counter argument, just sharing a point of view inspired by yours. You made it clear that your perspective on art is emotion-centric: "the point in art for me is emotions" compared to "just" pattern seeking. My comment was merely that the source of a viewer's emotional response art (not just yours) varies and is often independent from the artist's expressive intent. Some find Bach's spectacular discipline with patterns sublime.
@iridescentsquids i do not think that the viewer's emotional response varies much from that intended. Looking at michelangelo's pieta there's much more of a chance that you will feel just that - mercy, pity than anger or let's say happiness. of course i cannot say the same for modern art which i do not appreciate much(you can probably make that out from my comments). also i must add if they find bach's play with patterns sublime that it was probably bach's intention for them to find it as such
@cirocar yea, I suppose I agree with that basic idea, even if the form + results are completely open-ended (theres' no set formula for this kind of expression you are talking about). But this description applies equally to Picasso.
Funny you mention Michelangelo. In many ways he was a precursor to later (modern) concepts of art + artists, I think much more in line with Picasso than many of his contemporaries.
But I agree, that some kind transference/expression seem to be at the heart of it.
@iridescentsquids i wouldn't say he was in line with picasso but more with the minimalistic movement as he abstracted his statues in his later years. i do need to correct myself that it's not all modern art that i do not like. i have to say i especially hate this fan movement around people such as picasso or dali when people do not even study IN REAL LIFE paintings or other works of art by earlier artists. only by studying their lives and art do you see how much devotion and skill they had
Amazing, just simply amazing. The way he moves the brush and how softly he does it, almost seems that he just follows what his hand wants to paint! No words can explain what kind of surreal talent he was and is :)
Obsession with attaching lines is transformed by the lines themselves, just as obsession with animal forms (fish and rooster) is transformed by the artist's painted face. Lines connect and define endlessly whereas paint flows and liberates freely.
@chand36 by his mid teens he could paint like raphael...but it took him many years to learn how to paint like a child......art is all about emotions and style of an artist...no doubt picasso is a genius....just becuz u cant comprehend his art doesnt mean it suck....personally i dont understand his art either, but everyone perceive things differently...try to find the style that u like....i like monet but not picasso....even tho they both are consider great painters.
@gkcnae no, like i mention in my response earlier, everyone perceive things differently. i couldnt comprehend his art like few other peoples do...but imma only try to point out that picasso can paint by comparing him to raphael at teenage-hood....however, as he gets older and mature, his own unique style was established....u dont have to appreciate his art.....i dont either.
@chand36 you're mad. Do you remember his paintings when he was a child? How can you tell that he sucks while he paints with such mastery? How can you explain the price of his paintings if he sucks?
@delavg R u serious? what mastery? as of the price for his paintings, i cant figure it out. who is buying them? and why? perhaps stupidity, on the buyers part?
@delavg yes iv seen a few, they are different from what he does in this video, but i did not find them even a bit impressive. yes im looking at them now, and i dont like them. maybe u can explain to me why u like Picasso?
@chand36 I think they're impressive if you know he was a child when he painted napoleon for example - Maybe not original - At first i like cubism a lot - I don't care if there is an explanation in all his paintings, there are many picassos that i don't like - 'the old man with a guitar' for example - I like his colours a lot - much more than van gogh, monet, gauguin ..
You know when you're an art major or an art expert if you know Picasso and many other modern artists of his period are amazing. Yes, his work may be "simple" or anyone can do it. But at that time period it was doing something diff. Picasso and many other artists can do traditional. That's boring b/c everyone at the time can do that too. You have to admire is how he & his fellow artists sold this style to art enthusiasts. That itself is amazing too!
@kegasuru What im trying to say is that, anyone can draw like Picasso. It does not take much skill or talent. He did not deserve to be rich and famous. He deserved to be "that crazy homeless dude that attempts to draw."
@kegasuru so ppl like his work, because he is mentally disturbed? i guess if one were to look at it in that sense, he could be passed on as an interesting person and even "artist" but skill wise, he is as good as a 3-7 year old child.
@EdmondDantes1934 can you qualify why it matters whether or not something is "hard to do" should having any bearing on how good something is? I mean, some of the best music in the world is simple 3 chord stuff.
@NotNamedJones 3 chord music being some of the greatest is your opinion. and not everyone likes the same sort of music, as is with art. i think Picasso is the lamest artist probably ever. his work is childish.
@chand36 ironically, calling his work childish is actually a complement since he experimented with it at different points, but if you're attributing that to all of his work, you really should research this artist a bit more before you open your mouth and make a fool of yourself. picasso began as a brilliant academically trained realist who abandoned and revisited it off and on throughout his career. its not all the same.
@chand36 also, about simple music, most reasonable people will admit that there is excellent music that is very simplistic and at the same time there is some very complicated (or at least, complicated sounding) music that is terrible. it isn't to say that hard music can't be good though. its not the difficulty of something that qualifies it as good or not.
Back when i was younger i talked like the other shitheads in the comments section and said "Picasso was a fraud, i could draw that". Over the years i painted, drawed, sculptured and did alot of other things. I studied more and more art and history and i have to say that Picasso was truly a great artist. But explaining this to people with a traditional and simple viewpoint on things who dont want it to be changed is tiring and hard.
You need to study a little art. By saying realism takes skill I suppose you are trying to say that abstract art doesn't, and you are very wrong.
Think about what art is, why does something need to seem real in order for it to be art? By the way, Picasso and all other big abstract painters had huge talents and painted realist paintings too. They chose to express themselves rather than portrait something dull without feelings.
I HATE IT WHEN ARTSY FUCKS TRY AND LOOK WAY TOO DEEP INTO THINGS AND GIVE THEM A DEEP MEANING WHEN IT'S OBVIOUSLY JUST A FUCKIN DOODLING. NO PICASSO DIDN'T HELP TO "change" THE WAY I SEE ANYTHING. HE HAD SOME HITS IN HIS YOUNGER YEARS AND THEN RODE THE WAVE OF FAME AND GAVE LESS AND LESS EFFORT...EXAMPLE:THE PAINTING IN THIS VIDEO =)
Ow, and the face and the litle man around it. he just got pissed and draw a face that expressed him, hes sadness and frustration when the freaking ass hole trying to control his painting x'D
In this rare game show clip from 1956, you can watch naked Picasso turn a fish into a chicken, then into a charred devil teddy bear, all while being monitored by a man smoking a pipe - a feat which could only be accomplished by a genius - or pretty much anyone else.
In this rare game show clip from 1956, you can watch naked Picasso turn a fish into a chicken, then into a charred devil teddy bear, all while being monitored by a man smoking a pipe - a feat which could only be accomplished by a genius - or pretty much anyone else.
just small wow, from me. times 3. just much too way way beyond truly wicked cool....to just stop, ....and watch. Stop, ....maybe one day, ...finally look. And see.....something/anything.........I truly wish....I could just [begin] to paint.
One is from a very great artitst and the other of me. Then I show it to another artist and I ask him which one is beatifull, he will choose one of them. If he choose mine he I know their is no difference. Because on both paintings are completly with paint.
Only the name of the artist can change it, and fool people. Real paintings are beautifulll and not completely like this. Try it for yourself and ask your neighbour whichone he likes.... hahahah
@Neon241 .... I understand the name of an artist can be a credit for the sell.
Picasso also sold too many bad works which turned into big bucks.
but your explanation from art (real painting = beautiful) is very traditional... you can read about the meaning of "beauty" if you r eager to understand the message of modern art.
the genius of what picasso did in this video can only be captured in film, the painting he made in this video is not the art itself, but the process he just went through was. who sees a fish within a drawing of a plant? who sees a chicken within the drawing of a fish? picasso did, and that is genius.
the genius of what picasso did in this video can only be captured in film, the painting he made in this video is not the art itself, but the process he just went through was the art. who sees a fish within a drawing of a plant? who sees a chicken within the drawing of a fish? picasso did, and that is genius.
It's difficult for the average person to understand what Picasso has done, & that's completely understandable. The simplest way to explain it is when you view something as modern NOW, Picasso made a huge contribution to its evolution. He helped change what you see today. He and hundreds of great artists contributed. But, when your paintings become Priceless , that means that the WORLD noticed you. It's not his fault. He was a super talent, whether you enjoy the work or not.
@bdbd I gone explain to you what he painted he painted the human evolucion 1 -nothing 2-the vegetal 3 -the fish 4- the chichen 5- then he painted more grass that means the 2 eat vegeteblaS 6-Monkey turns in to men
7-Men overcomes everthing but he still got a little bit of fish /chichen inside him then there is others ,but men in essency is selfish in the end PiCASSO PAINTED PICASSO.
i want to understand picasso better but i need someone to answer this question.....What if my 5 year old brother drew that picture or something similar and i showed it to the viewer...would it get as much praise? honestly sit and think about it..
@hovtakeover check out his early work. if its that realistic, boring art you're into then it should be good for you. picasso could paint anything he wanted, what made him a true artist is the fact that he always did.
@hovtakeover the thing is that as every one of us has heard ''anyone can do that in a musem in refer us to a limited mind person. look if art was just the ability to paint reality we already have good cams we dont need thAT ART is a third dimension thing you have to see throught like a diferent language
@hovtakeover no he wouldn't because he would just draw to draw...picasso even said it took him 60 years to learn how to draw like a child, watch picasso biography here on youtube so you can see the types of paintings he painted Look at his Femme au Chapeau Orne 1962 painting...it's gorgeous, so simple and yet so difficult, to think up something like that in your mind is amazing.
The works of Picasso are overrated. They have always been. As much as historians wants us to remember he wanted to break conventions, this film also proves how erratic and improvised his realisations were. Picasso had pictural talent as a younger artist and just perverted it with time.
@stargate121: Does he blow it? It seems like his purpose wasn't sale, but process. His whole opening sequence may have just been for the camera, not for a final creation.
That makes visual arts so subjective. I look at this particular Picasso's work and see nothing extraordinarily brilliant about it. It's nonesensical scribbling signifying nothing....
That makes visual arts so subjective. I look at this particular Picasso's work and see nothing extraordinarily brilliant about it. It's nonesensical scribbling signifying nothing....
@didondio Because he was a master. By the age of 12 he had mastered any style. He could paint, draw anything!!! And what he DID paint was the output of his master-full artistic genius. if you don't like it then you don't like it, but remember, lots of people (most of the greatest) did, and do.
@SipuliSiili He could make detailed paintings or stuff relating to classical art, he did when he was young. He just chose to paint like this, hence the category modern art lol I cant see why people dont like it though
Aun asi es muy loable tu opinion si tomamos en cuenta que viene de una persona que se dedica a vestirse de mujer y a bailar y saltar entre peluches de pre-kinder. que ya he visto tu canal con un gran interes artistico y con unas ansias enormes de aprender algo, en fin, saludos y gracias por entretenerme un rato con tu video.
@hectorchp1 te aclaro, que aquella vez que participe en Bugs Bunny show ,fué por invitación de parte del elenco del mismo, no es que me dedíque a eso, y ellos lo hicieron por que son amigos de mi hija, si ya viste en mi canal mis videos, te habrás dado cuenta, en; Jazzy bailando a Shakira...... en la puerta,mi hija de 3 años, tiene pegados sus dibujos y se asemejan a un picasso,.Participar en ese show no cualquier hispano tiene suerte y para tu niña te conviertes en su héroe Tienes hijos?
@angelsuntaxi en este caso cualquier niño que dibuje algo pinta parecido a picasso, eso lo he escuchado toda la vida, en cuanto a mis hijos si los tengo?lo siento pero yo no ventilo mi vida privada y por lo de tu hija solo me resta decir que en realidad se nota que tiene cualidades artisticas que por lo que se ve estas cultivando, eso es muy bueno, lo demas son solo diferentes puntos de vista.
@hectorchp1 Soy ateo desde que empezó mi mente a preservar recuerdos, más sin embargo leí toda la biblia,pero como un libro,lleno de filosofía, al igua lo he hecho a San Agustín,Platón,Descartes, Kant,Sófocles, Ariatoteles,entre otros.Leí mucho de Psicología infantil y aplicada, todo eso; por que todo lo que la mente genera más allá de lo normal es arte y genialidad y yo nací, pintor, fuí a la Universidad, por un cartoncito que me acredite,nada más,si lees a Dalí entenderas muchas cosas,saludos.
does he make up his paintings as he goes along? AWESOME !!!!!
MrDrawingboard1 2 months ago
Picasso is really awesome.
donguri3333 3 months ago
from my point of view dhali is better modern art is not as great as some realistic painting and picasso is one of those guys who used drugs to make art if someone say something about drugs just ask someone who knows what was the fav drink of picasso.absenth.on those days absenth was so strong that made picasso mad at drawing.
MyPitMind 3 months ago
@MyPitMind yeah, but Dali used to do Mescaline.
VanTobyx 2 months ago
@AutumnSplendors MLK beat his wife, does that mean his ideas on racial equality should be discounted? Of course not. Never confuse the individual with his ideas.
vinoberg 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is ridiculous! Picasso could not even _understand_ differential equations, let alone work them. A total loser. What does his art do? Does it build computers? Cars? No. So stop wasting time on this charaltan.
LeMerdealepen 3 months ago
10000 pablo picassos must die
EATshitanddrinkbleac 4 months ago
Picasso was a phony riding a wave of public phenomena; demonstrating the falseness of academic categorization and classification. As well example of the dangers of a ego out of control. devoid of humility and perspective (no pun intended).
tigerbutter360 4 months ago
Shit. Like 80% of his work. The method is only interesting because of who he is. Contrived dogshit. Plus he was a wanker too.
VincentsBlog 4 months ago
et paf 10000000 $
interne21 4 months ago
haha after spending 6 weeks researching picasso the comments on this page are refreshing
em1lyz2 4 months ago
a piece of shit
giojiu 5 months ago
Some of the crap that Picasso has painted...
tooshortboi1 5 months ago 2
6:25 LMFAO What a champ! As soon as he breaks he goes straight for the bottle.
campbpar 5 months ago
I'm Picasso! That'll be 10 million bucks.
campbpar 5 months ago 3
Picassa a inspire pas mal d'artistes semble t il. Encore une fois, quelqu'un connait il le peintre Maurice Experton dont les peintures resseblent beaucoup a du Picassa?
davidmatthieu 5 months ago
What did he draw s:??
XxIvanisKoolxX 5 months ago
wow so ahead of his time he made a youtube style movie lol
optimusjizza 5 months ago
grazie))
artvugar.com
vugarmuradov 5 months ago
Picasso is to much picasso. Is the mejor.
CHUFLAS100 5 months ago
this guy's drawing is waaay more talented than picasso
watch?v=3NCAd0FHoVg
Valca000 6 months ago
hmmm, needs more cowbell.
whoisbbg 6 months ago 9
Si Picasso vous passionne, venez voir quelques vidéo sur ma chaîne. Cordialement.
If you are passionate about Picasso, come and see some video on my channel. Regards.
Tout ce que l’on ne voit pas sur le plateau de la Victorine de Nice - Le Mystère ! - (occulté par les diktats de Kahnweiler), est aujourd’hui mis au grand jour sur cette vidéo.
All that we do not see on the set of Victorine in Nice - The Mystery! - (Obscured by the dictates of Kahnweiler), is now brought to light on this video.
Cassia1907 6 months ago
OMG Piccaso predicted GMO foods! He IS way before his time!!!
superGoodjuju 6 months ago
There can only ever be one first, one pioneer.
His 'ways of seeing' may not have been the most original in the world, since we know he borrowed heavily from so called primitive and tribal art, but in that getting back to basics and stripping away all the fluff he set the precedent.
The third ingredient being how prolific he was, he must have been a volcano of art for decades to produce all that he did.
Incredible character and now immortal.
misternylon 6 months ago
@misternylon If we transform all his works in time, (hours) it would have had two lives to accomplish allhis works? A question arises: How to he done?
Si l'on transforme toutes ses oeuvres en temps passé, (en heures) il lui aurait fallu deux vies pour réaliser toutes ses oeuvres? Une question se pose: Comment à-t-il fait?
Cassia1907 5 months ago
the point in art for me is emotions. i am sorry but i do not see emotions in his paintings and now seeing his process i do not see them even less. the thing i see here is clever visual play as you see him searching for what lines to add in a painting rather than having the intention of conveying emotions in the painting for the viewer to see them and feel them. i too can draw mazes of curved lines. i am sorry but this is my opinion
cirocar 6 months ago
@cirocar "the intention of conveying emotions in the painting for the viewer to see them and feel them."
I have heard people say this about the structure and technique of Bach, and even Mozart (compared to, say, Chopin).
An emotional response to anything, art included, is not contingent upon expressive intent. Sometimes the truth of something is emotional. Sometimes just seeing another mind at work is dramatic and full of meaning. Emotive intent in art is often just the tip of the iceberg.
iridescentsquids 6 months ago
@iridescentsquids obviously you took my quote out of context but nonetheless. obviously anything in the world is emotional, therefore your counterargument is null. i was comparing the INTENT of CONVEYING emotions when making art to the obvious randomness/a form of child's play when drawing something(i explained it below when i said it's clear here that picasso is searching for pattern of what to draw next). and what if people said the same for bach or mozart?
cirocar 6 months ago
@cirocar "therefore your counterargument is null."
I'm not making a counter argument, just sharing a point of view inspired by yours. You made it clear that your perspective on art is emotion-centric: "the point in art for me is emotions" compared to "just" pattern seeking. My comment was merely that the source of a viewer's emotional response art (not just yours) varies and is often independent from the artist's expressive intent. Some find Bach's spectacular discipline with patterns sublime.
iridescentsquids 6 months ago
@iridescentsquids i do not think that the viewer's emotional response varies much from that intended. Looking at michelangelo's pieta there's much more of a chance that you will feel just that - mercy, pity than anger or let's say happiness. of course i cannot say the same for modern art which i do not appreciate much(you can probably make that out from my comments). also i must add if they find bach's play with patterns sublime that it was probably bach's intention for them to find it as such
cirocar 6 months ago
@cirocar yea, I suppose I agree with that basic idea, even if the form + results are completely open-ended (theres' no set formula for this kind of expression you are talking about). But this description applies equally to Picasso.
Funny you mention Michelangelo. In many ways he was a precursor to later (modern) concepts of art + artists, I think much more in line with Picasso than many of his contemporaries.
But I agree, that some kind transference/expression seem to be at the heart of it.
iridescentsquids 6 months ago
@iridescentsquids i wouldn't say he was in line with picasso but more with the minimalistic movement as he abstracted his statues in his later years. i do need to correct myself that it's not all modern art that i do not like. i have to say i especially hate this fan movement around people such as picasso or dali when people do not even study IN REAL LIFE paintings or other works of art by earlier artists. only by studying their lives and art do you see how much devotion and skill they had
cirocar 6 months ago
Amazing, just simply amazing. The way he moves the brush and how softly he does it, almost seems that he just follows what his hand wants to paint! No words can explain what kind of surreal talent he was and is :)
ILoveBlueMoreThanYou 6 months ago
Cena do Filme Le Mistère Picasso
victorhccn 6 months ago
::: Congratulations for this beautiful video dedicated
to the GREAT & Exhilarating MASTER ... - Alias: - " Pablo PICASSO " ... ! )
-
::: Love in someway is like a " Bank Account " ... Nothing you' ll put in it and nothing you' ll find in it ... :::
-
(( AUTHOR : Pino GAUDIOSO ))
-
PinoGAUDIOSO4you 6 months ago 2
The picture is the shadow of a hungry cat getting ready to pounce on a chicken. The figure with the arms raised is an angry farmer in the background.
That's my take on it anyway
Patrick502 6 months ago
Comment removed
MrMikeludo 7 months ago
This particular painting is a piece of shit.
lip333 7 months ago
è incredibile vedere come dipinge quest'uomo. Grazie Yo
danielbream 7 months ago
Obsession with attaching lines is transformed by the lines themselves, just as obsession with animal forms (fish and rooster) is transformed by the artist's painted face. Lines connect and define endlessly whereas paint flows and liberates freely.
Neobarone 7 months ago
@palicsito You are very blind. His art sucks. Try to open your eyes.
chand36 8 months ago
@chand36 by his mid teens he could paint like raphael...but it took him many years to learn how to paint like a child......art is all about emotions and style of an artist...no doubt picasso is a genius....just becuz u cant comprehend his art doesnt mean it suck....personally i dont understand his art either, but everyone perceive things differently...try to find the style that u like....i like monet but not picasso....even tho they both are consider great painters.
gkcnae 8 months ago
@gkcnae Can you elaborate on your point as to why painting like a child is so important?
coopasan9 8 months ago
@gkcnae no, like i mention in my response earlier, everyone perceive things differently. i couldnt comprehend his art like few other peoples do...but imma only try to point out that picasso can paint by comparing him to raphael at teenage-hood....however, as he gets older and mature, his own unique style was established....u dont have to appreciate his art.....i dont either.
gkcnae 7 months ago
@chand36 you're mad. Do you remember his paintings when he was a child? How can you tell that he sucks while he paints with such mastery? How can you explain the price of his paintings if he sucks?
delavg 7 months ago
@delavg R u serious? what mastery? as of the price for his paintings, i cant figure it out. who is buying them? and why? perhaps stupidity, on the buyers part?
chand36 7 months ago
@chand36 Do you know his firsts paintings?
delavg 7 months ago
@delavg yes iv seen a few, they are different from what he does in this video, but i did not find them even a bit impressive. yes im looking at them now, and i dont like them. maybe u can explain to me why u like Picasso?
chand36 7 months ago
@chand36 I think they're impressive if you know he was a child when he painted napoleon for example - Maybe not original - At first i like cubism a lot - I don't care if there is an explanation in all his paintings, there are many picassos that i don't like - 'the old man with a guitar' for example - I like his colours a lot - much more than van gogh, monet, gauguin ..
delavg 7 months ago
Look at how Picasso created his masterpieces?
I am an admirer of Pablo Picasso who needs your support to do what Picasso wanted you to know.
Cassia John Gilbert Moreno
Cassia1907 8 months ago
You know when you're an art major or an art expert if you know Picasso and many other modern artists of his period are amazing. Yes, his work may be "simple" or anyone can do it. But at that time period it was doing something diff. Picasso and many other artists can do traditional. That's boring b/c everyone at the time can do that too. You have to admire is how he & his fellow artists sold this style to art enthusiasts. That itself is amazing too!
AlyMew 8 months ago
@kegasuru What im trying to say is that, anyone can draw like Picasso. It does not take much skill or talent. He did not deserve to be rich and famous. He deserved to be "that crazy homeless dude that attempts to draw."
chand36 8 months ago
@chand36
You are very stupid. He was a great artist. Try to think.
palicsito 8 months ago
@kegasuru so ppl like his work, because he is mentally disturbed? i guess if one were to look at it in that sense, he could be passed on as an interesting person and even "artist" but skill wise, he is as good as a 3-7 year old child.
chand36 8 months ago
I dont understand wy he draw a cockroll and after he painting all over him black?
SALVATORE6251 8 months ago
@EdmondDantes1934 can you qualify why it matters whether or not something is "hard to do" should having any bearing on how good something is? I mean, some of the best music in the world is simple 3 chord stuff.
NotNamedJones 8 months ago
@NotNamedJones 3 chord music being some of the greatest is your opinion. and not everyone likes the same sort of music, as is with art. i think Picasso is the lamest artist probably ever. his work is childish.
chand36 8 months ago
@chand36 ironically, calling his work childish is actually a complement since he experimented with it at different points, but if you're attributing that to all of his work, you really should research this artist a bit more before you open your mouth and make a fool of yourself. picasso began as a brilliant academically trained realist who abandoned and revisited it off and on throughout his career. its not all the same.
NotNamedJones 8 months ago
@chand36 also, about simple music, most reasonable people will admit that there is excellent music that is very simplistic and at the same time there is some very complicated (or at least, complicated sounding) music that is terrible. it isn't to say that hard music can't be good though. its not the difficulty of something that qualifies it as good or not.
NotNamedJones 8 months ago
Back when i was younger i talked like the other shitheads in the comments section and said "Picasso was a fraud, i could draw that". Over the years i painted, drawed, sculptured and did alot of other things. I studied more and more art and history and i have to say that Picasso was truly a great artist. But explaining this to people with a traditional and simple viewpoint on things who dont want it to be changed is tiring and hard.
Praioscal 9 months ago
@CHLOTHARIUS
those insults really support your point!
acapulc9 9 months ago
@EdmondDantes1934
You need to study a little art. By saying realism takes skill I suppose you are trying to say that abstract art doesn't, and you are very wrong.
Think about what art is, why does something need to seem real in order for it to be art? By the way, Picasso and all other big abstract painters had huge talents and painted realist paintings too. They chose to express themselves rather than portrait something dull without feelings.
dsanzo 9 months ago
I HATE IT WHEN ARTSY FUCKS TRY AND LOOK WAY TOO DEEP INTO THINGS AND GIVE THEM A DEEP MEANING WHEN IT'S OBVIOUSLY JUST A FUCKIN DOODLING. NO PICASSO DIDN'T HELP TO "change" THE WAY I SEE ANYTHING. HE HAD SOME HITS IN HIS YOUNGER YEARS AND THEN RODE THE WAVE OF FAME AND GAVE LESS AND LESS EFFORT...EXAMPLE:THE PAINTING IN THIS VIDEO =)
evelauds 9 months ago
@evelauds There's no need to SHOUT! :)
mbojkowski 9 months ago
@evelauds calm down and kill yourself
CTCCoco 8 months ago
even my 3 year old kid can paint like that, Picasso ----> overrated fuck
bojacub 9 months ago
@bojacub
your 3 year old kid can not paint like Picasso, check out some of his earlier work. :)
DavidPotter360 9 months ago
@bojacub You don't know what you say.
CTCCoco 8 months ago
@ledzepp423
You must've bwwn joking.
Pablo Picasso. One of the most known (and also misunderstood) artists.
brycelancer 9 months ago
That painting is now worth 10 million dollars
entelekhia 9 months ago
J'adore presque tout c'est toile !!!!! C fantastique on puise voire sa
frankyalex29 10 months ago
Creative perpetuum mobile!
Sveckakraljica 10 months ago
he surely thinks " i can do shitless works for the papparazzi, and still be picasso"
alejandro0002 10 months ago
thanks
chunkybongo 10 months ago
3:30
best part!
"Hmmm...needs a spot right there..."
lovetownsend 10 months ago 2
wtf
bojacub 10 months ago
Entitled "Piece of Crap #38,657"
cosg9531 11 months ago
great.
ANDREA SANA punto com
MrDadada2424 11 months ago
I love Picasso, but that picture sucked ass.
tothatextent 11 months ago
slow start to this movie but the ending is amazing
delameu 11 months ago
Ow, and the face and the litle man around it. he just got pissed and draw a face that expressed him, hes sadness and frustration when the freaking ass hole trying to control his painting x'D
FreyjaGodesS 11 months ago
Dudes come on, the chicken ate the fish that had eaten the plant.
Story line was: chicken was looking from some weeds to eat, moron fish came a long and ate them, chicken got pissed and ate the fish ^^
FreyjaGodesS 11 months ago
IT IS THE DEVIL AND HIS FOLLOWERS IN THE SHADOW..
THE CHICKEN IS 4 THE SACRIFICE...
NOW LOOK AGAIN AND TELL ME WHAT DO U SEE..
kalliann4 11 months ago
Damn, he wrecked a brilliant chicken!
Dean3024 11 months ago
mais c'est nul!!!! plus il rajoutait de couleur plus ça devenait un vrai gribouillis
seesaw75 11 months ago
Amazing...
he was and still is such a great artist, so inspiring, so creative...
Picasso RULES
LunaCrestfall 11 months ago
Shit's Weak!!! Watch My Painting Videos! lol
sinfuledge 11 months ago
MODERNISM IS EVOLUTION!
misterpeaky 11 months ago
In this rare game show clip from 1956, you can watch naked Picasso turn a fish into a chicken, then into a charred devil teddy bear, all while being monitored by a man smoking a pipe - a feat which could only be accomplished by a genius - or pretty much anyone else.
allyerwishes 1 year ago
In this rare game show clip from 1956, you can watch naked Picasso turn a fish into a chicken, then into a charred devil teddy bear, all while being monitored by a man smoking a pipe - a feat which could only be accomplished by a genius - or pretty much anyone else.
allyerwishes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he has good technique. is he an artist or something?
ledzepp423 1 year ago
what a crazy motherfucker
pedroissler1992 1 year ago
god video ! :D
leax1855 1 year ago
just small wow, from me. times 3. just much too way way beyond truly wicked cool....to just stop, ....and watch. Stop, ....maybe one day, ...finally look. And see.....something/anything.........I truly wish....I could just [begin] to paint.
setoncidolem73 1 year ago
The real Picasso experience
shiambles 1 year ago
he even draw the mothafukin digestif system
pedro6199782 1 year ago
if I have two paintings
One is from a very great artitst and the other of me. Then I show it to another artist and I ask him which one is beatifull, he will choose one of them. If he choose mine he I know their is no difference. Because on both paintings are completly with paint.
Only the name of the artist can change it, and fool people. Real paintings are beautifulll and not completely like this. Try it for yourself and ask your neighbour whichone he likes.... hahahah
Neon241 1 year ago
@Neon241 .... I understand the name of an artist can be a credit for the sell.
Picasso also sold too many bad works which turned into big bucks.
but your explanation from art (real painting = beautiful) is very traditional... you can read about the meaning of "beauty" if you r eager to understand the message of modern art.
RoyaBarrette 1 year ago
What makes one artist soooo fantastic and another a nobody?
If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, than then artistic fame is in the BS of the critics. Or should I say pockets?
Xsuprio 1 year ago
where did the fish go? lol
black4pienus 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ArtEmar4you...
:::
Congratulations for such nice video of A EXHILARATING &
GREAT ARTIST... Like " PABLO PICASSO "... ! )
:::
::: In someway love it's just like a " Bank Account "...
Nothing you'll put in it and nothing you'll find in it... ::: PG
:::
ArtEmar4you 1 year ago
I removed my comment...I take it back. Picasso is an awesome artist after all.
EricSchwin22 1 year ago
Comment removed
EricSchwin22 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the genius of what picasso did in this video can only be captured in film, the painting he made in this video is not the art itself, but the process he just went through was. who sees a fish within a drawing of a plant? who sees a chicken within the drawing of a fish? picasso did, and that is genius.
skate4dogfood 1 year ago
the genius of what picasso did in this video can only be captured in film, the painting he made in this video is not the art itself, but the process he just went through was the art. who sees a fish within a drawing of a plant? who sees a chicken within the drawing of a fish? picasso did, and that is genius.
skate4dogfood 1 year ago 5
don't be too intellectual about this.. he went too far.. he made a mistake with the paint and the brush.. It can happen to anybody.. even Picasso!
Pan3405 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Visit my Channel. French Artist. Visit my Channel.
LoulouisaRa 1 year ago
BUENO USTED SIGA SUPONIENDO!!!!
SALUDOS COORDIALES :)
cared1000 1 year ago
It's difficult for the average person to understand what Picasso has done, & that's completely understandable. The simplest way to explain it is when you view something as modern NOW, Picasso made a huge contribution to its evolution. He helped change what you see today. He and hundreds of great artists contributed. But, when your paintings become Priceless , that means that the WORLD noticed you. It's not his fault. He was a super talent, whether you enjoy the work or not.
bdbd 1 year ago 20
@bdbd Great, "sober" comment.
YofterMofter 10 months ago
@bdbd I gone explain to you what he painted he painted the human evolucion 1 -nothing 2-the vegetal 3 -the fish 4- the chichen 5- then he painted more grass that means the 2 eat vegeteblaS 6-Monkey turns in to men
7-Men overcomes everthing but he still got a little bit of fish /chichen inside him then there is others ,but men in essency is selfish in the end PiCASSO PAINTED PICASSO.
portugal81 6 months ago 12
@portugal81
8- and the gorilla comes and urinates on a canvas
jarduli 5 months ago
Comment removed
EvilEtiquette 6 months ago
i want to understand picasso better but i need someone to answer this question.....What if my 5 year old brother drew that picture or something similar and i showed it to the viewer...would it get as much praise? honestly sit and think about it..
hovtakeover 1 year ago
@hovtakeover check out his early work. if its that realistic, boring art you're into then it should be good for you. picasso could paint anything he wanted, what made him a true artist is the fact that he always did.
adammcneil 1 year ago
@hovtakeover the thing is that as every one of us has heard ''anyone can do that in a musem in refer us to a limited mind person. look if art was just the ability to paint reality we already have good cams we dont need thAT ART is a third dimension thing you have to see throught like a diferent language
yougottamoveitbaby 1 year ago 2
@hovtakeover no he wouldn't because he would just draw to draw...picasso even said it took him 60 years to learn how to draw like a child, watch picasso biography here on youtube so you can see the types of paintings he painted Look at his Femme au Chapeau Orne 1962 painting...it's gorgeous, so simple and yet so difficult, to think up something like that in your mind is amazing.
zw0ecool 9 months ago
6:00pm Tuesday (CET) - Time in France5 10 15
MaybeSthlmFARSTASTRADECEMBER1420104
6:00pm Tuesday (CET) - Time in France5 10 15
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
I wonder how much that painting is worth today...??
Maybe 5.000 000 - 10. 000 000 Euro ?
SthlmFARSTASTRAND 1 year ago
is he using a marker?
sicknofty 1 year ago
Fantastico...l'opera dentro l'opera che emerge comunque anche se non direttamente ...strati di arte nascosti...non rivelati ma evocati.
Grazie...Roberto.
robertocasitenore 1 year ago
The works of Picasso are overrated. They have always been. As much as historians wants us to remember he wanted to break conventions, this film also proves how erratic and improvised his realisations were. Picasso had pictural talent as a younger artist and just perverted it with time.
ericsyre 1 year ago
He made a right balls out of that one.
mingonuts 1 year ago
Picasso is overrated.
DominicanIdentity 1 year ago
@DominicanIdentity salvador dali is way better ... and yes I agree...
maw88ify 1 year ago
... fuck you picasso -God
whowebe43 1 year ago
drawing of mentally disturbed man.
splitskaposla 1 year ago 2
CPABLOPICASSO
3:58 LOVE NEM C
CIRCLECENTE R
IMANDYMOOREC
CIRCLECENTE R
3:58 LOVE NEM C
CPABLOPICASSO
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
11/29/2010STCATHERINEOFALEXANDRIA
5:56pm Monday (CET) - Time in FranceM-L
EEFITWASIMPRESSIVEPICASSOGRADE-P
5:56pm Monday (CET) - Time in FranceM-L
11/29/2010STCATHERINEOFALEXANDRIA
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
5:32pm Sunday (CET) - Time n FrancePP
0:32 WHO LOVES YOU BABY?SEVALASE
5:32pm Sunday (CET) - Time n FrancePP
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
Picasso was a Genius,a Fantasmagorical person,very unique
I LOVE HIM
capjoartist1200 1 year ago
da best
mervin3x 1 year ago
Didn't they know they were in the presence of Greatness.......
MrBCornish 1 year ago
fuck this art bullshit. i saw alot of stupid paintings am like watever, bu WTF is this shit. Picasso can draw an ass and everyone would like it.
BIGT1555 1 year ago
@BIGT1555 please dont talk if youre not an artist okay
mervin3x 1 year ago 2
@mervin3x Thank you. I completely agree.
jazzchick88 1 year ago
now you know why they call ANDRE JAMAL WALKER the BEST PAINTER ALIVE!
flossybandre 1 year ago
@stargate121: Does he blow it? It seems like his purpose wasn't sale, but process. His whole opening sequence may have just been for the camera, not for a final creation.
bryandadam 1 year ago
picasso is the greatest painter of munod and am studying in my school called vegeta amat
005142508062 1 year ago
After 3:10 he totally blows it.
stargate121 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PlEASE LOOK MY OIL PAINTINGS IN MY CHANNEL... I WILL APRICIATE YOUR COMMENT :)
StefanoPiroddi 1 year ago
PlEASE LOOK MY OIL PAINTINGS IN MY CHANNEL... I WILL APRICIATE YOUR COMMENT :)
StefanoPiroddi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That makes visual arts so subjective. I look at this particular Picasso's work and see nothing extraordinarily brilliant about it. It's nonesensical scribbling signifying nothing....
hulasana 1 year ago
That makes visual arts so subjective. I look at this particular Picasso's work and see nothing extraordinarily brilliant about it. It's nonesensical scribbling signifying nothing....
hulasana 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why is Picasso so great
tigerstarss 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Problem. Idea. Plan. Journey.
Shelter. Joy. Obscure. Silence.
Trust. Sorrow. Escape. Fate.
Detour. Accident. Caution. Retreat.
Compromise. Solitude. Tendency. Fear.
YESTERDAY IS HERE.
AnIntangibleBadge 1 year ago
Why is Picasso soo great in the eyes of soo many ?
didondio 1 year ago
@didondio Because he was a master. By the age of 12 he had mastered any style. He could paint, draw anything!!! And what he DID paint was the output of his master-full artistic genius. if you don't like it then you don't like it, but remember, lots of people (most of the greatest) did, and do.
Total1Now 1 year ago
3:29am Monday (CDT) - Time in Mississippi,WECIII
C:BILINELINETAPABLOPICASSOCTOBERTWELVE
3:29am Monday (CDT) - Time in Mississippi,WECIII
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
Overrated shit is overrated shit.
I plainted better than him when i was 5.
Eravenus 1 year ago
Oooh kay.... It seems 10 years ago I was as skilled as Mr Picasso was when this clip was made...
SipuliSiili 1 year ago
@SipuliSiili He could make detailed paintings or stuff relating to classical art, he did when he was young. He just chose to paint like this, hence the category modern art lol I cant see why people dont like it though
PurplePlayer99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he does'nt know when to stop
rathbloom24 1 year ago
People like Picasso because people like Picasso.
smedley 1 year ago
shit !
didondio 1 year ago
It's a plant, fish, chicken with ticks, person thingy.
PineappleComics 1 year ago 17
@PineappleComics hehe i think its great!
rouncer81 1 year ago
@PineappleComics Hahahah! yea
robertmc777 9 months ago
There is a big statue by him of his wife in my town and it has to be the ugliest piece of crap I have ever seen... sorry
gaeddstank 1 year ago
Picasso is from SPAIN, the best painter in the history...
ELCASTIGADOR99 1 year ago
@ELCASTIGADOR99 his not from spain
MiNunderthesun 1 year ago
@MiNunderthesun He ism he just moved to Paris around 1904. D:
jazzchick88 1 year ago
@MiNunderthesun Lol hes from Andalucia ( south Spain)
ELCASTIGADOR99 1 year ago
ImpreSionante!
prohibidoadelantar 1 year ago
y que piensas del perfomance angelsuntaxi????? ...
immonowar 1 year ago
sum subtitles would help.
andresdapimp69 1 year ago
): hot and cool. black and white. no color .. eye ... great.
ug501 1 year ago
trippy
dylan7761 1 year ago
His soul is with us all ... My teacher!
grmekwalter 1 year ago
chuck norris would be sad if he watched this shit xD
REX78790 1 year ago
its good until 3.30
dynamothomar 1 year ago
Aun asi es muy loable tu opinion si tomamos en cuenta que viene de una persona que se dedica a vestirse de mujer y a bailar y saltar entre peluches de pre-kinder. que ya he visto tu canal con un gran interes artistico y con unas ansias enormes de aprender algo, en fin, saludos y gracias por entretenerme un rato con tu video.
hectorchp1 1 year ago
@hectorchp1 te aclaro, que aquella vez que participe en Bugs Bunny show ,fué por invitación de parte del elenco del mismo, no es que me dedíque a eso, y ellos lo hicieron por que son amigos de mi hija, si ya viste en mi canal mis videos, te habrás dado cuenta, en; Jazzy bailando a Shakira...... en la puerta,mi hija de 3 años, tiene pegados sus dibujos y se asemejan a un picasso,.Participar en ese show no cualquier hispano tiene suerte y para tu niña te conviertes en su héroe Tienes hijos?
angelsuntaxi 1 year ago
@angelsuntaxi en este caso cualquier niño que dibuje algo pinta parecido a picasso, eso lo he escuchado toda la vida, en cuanto a mis hijos si los tengo?lo siento pero yo no ventilo mi vida privada y por lo de tu hija solo me resta decir que en realidad se nota que tiene cualidades artisticas que por lo que se ve estas cultivando, eso es muy bueno, lo demas son solo diferentes puntos de vista.
hectorchp1 1 year ago
puedes empezar leyendo un poco de teologia y psicologia, despues regresa al arte
hectorchp1 1 year ago
@hectorchp1 Soy ateo desde que empezó mi mente a preservar recuerdos, más sin embargo leí toda la biblia,pero como un libro,lleno de filosofía, al igua lo he hecho a San Agustín,Platón,Descartes, Kant,Sófocles, Ariatoteles,entre otros.Leí mucho de Psicología infantil y aplicada, todo eso; por que todo lo que la mente genera más allá de lo normal es arte y genialidad y yo nací, pintor, fuí a la Universidad, por un cartoncito que me acredite,nada más,si lees a Dalí entenderas muchas cosas,saludos.
angelsuntaxi 1 year ago