"to allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs"?
In order to live "in peace", should British and American sons not have gone into battle to fight German and Japanese sons in the 1940s, then (or Baathist sons in 2003)?
Thereby allowing the German sons (the Nazis, in this case) and the Japanese sons (the imperialists) to continue the murder of innocent, unarmed sons (and daughters) of civilians in the countries they occupied?
That may not be the peace we want, ladies (and gents)...
Well, we don't want their sons trained to injure ours either, silly!
Boy I tell you me, had more women been in charge, there either would have been no world wars OR they'd have been much shorter.
Callmegoddess1234 2 years ago 4
There is such a thing as intervention when innocents are being slaughtered.
tapioca9809 3 years ago
"to allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs"?
In order to live "in peace", should British and American sons not have gone into battle to fight German and Japanese sons in the 1940s, then (or Baathist sons in 2003)?
Thereby allowing the German sons (the Nazis, in this case) and the Japanese sons (the imperialists) to continue the murder of innocent, unarmed sons (and daughters) of civilians in the countries they occupied?
That may not be the peace we want, ladies (and gents)...
Asteriks 3 years ago