this guy is a joke, "since I talk with an accent and sound so smart everybody else is stupid and their facts don't matter because they are scared morons"
what about the AST 119 E test that were done? the structure passed these scientific tests, unlike the bogus test done by NG
EMRTC, the people who performed the experiments on "9/11 science and conspiracy," provides training to US and friendly foreign governments in counter terriorism and explosive handling. National Geographic channel is run by Fox Networks, and we all know how biased Fox is. do your research before you believe any of the crap NGC showed. They even go as far as labeling anyone that spoke against their "experiments" as "Truther."
National Geographic Channel is owned by none other than Fox. EMRTC, the people who ran all the experiments are funded by the government to test anti terror experiments.
The part of the building above the impact would have fallen off to the side of the buildings, not straight down through the middle of such a structure if the official story were true.
Here watch this video, considering you are no halfwit, you should be able to understand it.
/watch?v=xG2y50Wyys4
If the north towers upper block was actually colliding with the lower building it would have shown the inherent physical symptoms of slightly decreasing momentum due to the essential physical law that it would have to spend kinetic energy to destroy the floors. This same exact point is made by Ryan Mackey on Hardfire. The N.towers upper block is being demolished by controlled demo.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
why does everyone believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy? there would be WAY too many people involved to keep it silent. all the arguments i've heard for it are absurd and it's just completely illogical to think that. what really happened was they ignored all warning signs and used a tragedy to fuel their agenda after the fact. inept government, nothing more.
For this guy to think that the government being stupid is scarier than it having capitulated is the part that scares me. He is clearly a tool of the coverup or ridiculously naive.
Just how thick was this piece of steel that was subjected to fire? Anything less than than a comparable substiutute is bad or 'junk' science- smoke and mirrors.
Sure it was possible to weaken the steel, where there was fire and damage from the plane impact but how did the steel below the impact and fire zone weaken? And why did nist find no physical evidence of temps high enough to weaken steel?
LBJ's "inside job" to sink the USS Liberty and successful mass murder of the crew was a "conspiracy theory" until the government declassified the documents to make it a historical fact. If we are allowed to have a "history" in the future, such documents will seal the truth of the 9/11 inside job. DOn't let then get away with it. Prosecute now.
this guy is a joke, "since I talk with an accent and sound so smart everybody else is stupid and their facts don't matter because they are scared morons"
what about the AST 119 E test that were done? the structure passed these scientific tests, unlike the bogus test done by NG
lisabob22 2 years ago
watch?v=D3kBn1usddI
saintearth 2 years ago
watch?v=_pwh-zCvz_Y&feature=PlayList&p=472C00C3B44D1DC4&index=0
WakeUpCall4World 2 years ago
EMRTC, the people who performed the experiments on "9/11 science and conspiracy," provides training to US and friendly foreign governments in counter terriorism and explosive handling. National Geographic channel is run by Fox Networks, and we all know how biased Fox is. do your research before you believe any of the crap NGC showed. They even go as far as labeling anyone that spoke against their "experiments" as "Truther."
bigbobboi 2 years ago
Comment removed
educution 2 years ago
watch?v=6sCiF1ridAg&feature=PlayList&p=4FFF9FB02BC277C3&index=1
saintearth 2 years ago
National Geographic Channel is owned by none other than Fox. EMRTC, the people who ran all the experiments are funded by the government to test anti terror experiments.
bigbobboi 2 years ago
The part of the building above the impact would have fallen off to the side of the buildings, not straight down through the middle of such a structure if the official story were true.
saintearth 2 years ago
Gravity pulled the building DOWN - exactly what force would have pushed them to the side?
911TruthMatters 2 years ago
The extremely strong structure underneath that was not effected by any heat. Two thirds of the tower.
saintearth 2 years ago
Yes, but it was effected by the other third slamming down on top of it ya halfwit. Something it was never designed to do.
911TruthMatters 2 years ago
watch?v=eZkSE2fWdfo&feature=related
saintearth 2 years ago
Here watch this video, considering you are no halfwit, you should be able to understand it.
/watch?v=xG2y50Wyys4
If the north towers upper block was actually colliding with the lower building it would have shown the inherent physical symptoms of slightly decreasing momentum due to the essential physical law that it would have to spend kinetic energy to destroy the floors. This same exact point is made by Ryan Mackey on Hardfire. The N.towers upper block is being demolished by controlled demo.
IndivisiblePrinciple 2 years ago
watch?v=zRs9PD6owj8&feature=video_response
saintearth 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why does everyone believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy? there would be WAY too many people involved to keep it silent. all the arguments i've heard for it are absurd and it's just completely illogical to think that. what really happened was they ignored all warning signs and used a tragedy to fuel their agenda after the fact. inept government, nothing more.
thecellarlife 2 years ago
For this guy to think that the government being stupid is scarier than it having capitulated is the part that scares me. He is clearly a tool of the coverup or ridiculously naive.
TheyCallHimTheTops 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
TheyCallHimTheTops 2 years ago
Just how thick was this piece of steel that was subjected to fire? Anything less than than a comparable substiutute is bad or 'junk' science- smoke and mirrors.
julsHz 2 years ago
Hmmmmmm
Lets see here
National Geographic is owned by News Corp (Rupert Murdoch) i do believe
Should be a fair and balanced scientific show
LMAO gimme a break
SaveOurSovereignty3 2 years ago
Sure it was possible to weaken the steel, where there was fire and damage from the plane impact but how did the steel below the impact and fire zone weaken? And why did nist find no physical evidence of temps high enough to weaken steel?
lisabob22 2 years ago
LBJ's "inside job" to sink the USS Liberty and successful mass murder of the crew was a "conspiracy theory" until the government declassified the documents to make it a historical fact. If we are allowed to have a "history" in the future, such documents will seal the truth of the 9/11 inside job. DOn't let then get away with it. Prosecute now.
Hsaive 2 years ago
Wonder what this guy has to say about the gulf of tonkin...
GiANtTWiNkY 2 years ago
inside job!
GiANtTWiNkY 2 years ago 2
Thom Hartmann is the only progressive voice to bring up the 9-11 conspiracy.
JH335163 2 years ago
inside job
mrzack888 2 years ago 2