Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this guy is a joke, "since I talk with an accent and sound so smart everybody else is stupid and their facts don't matter because they are scared morons"

    what about the AST 119 E test that were done? the structure passed these scientific tests, unlike the bogus test done by NG

  • watch?v=D3kBn1usddI

  • watch?v=_pwh-zCvz_Y&feature=Pl­ayList&p=472C00C3B44D1DC4&inde­x=0

  • EMRTC, the people who performed the experiments on "9/11 science and conspiracy," provides training to US and friendly foreign governments in counter terriorism and explosive handling. National Geographic channel is run by Fox Networks, and we all know how biased Fox is. do your research before you believe any of the crap NGC showed. They even go as far as labeling anyone that spoke against their "experiments" as "Truther."

  • Comment removed

  • watch?v=6sCiF1ridAg&feature=Pl­ayList&p=4FFF9FB02BC277C3&inde­x=1

  • National Geographic Channel is owned by none other than Fox. EMRTC, the people who ran all the experiments are funded by the government to test anti terror experiments.

  • The part of the building above the impact would have fallen off to the side of the buildings, not straight down through the middle of such a structure if the official story were true.

  • Gravity pulled the building DOWN - exactly what force would have pushed them to the side?

  • The extremely strong structure underneath that was not effected by any heat. Two thirds of the tower.

  • Yes, but it was effected by the other third slamming down on top of it ya halfwit. Something it was never designed to do.

  • watch?v=eZkSE2fWdfo&feature=re­lated

  • Here watch this video, considering you are no halfwit, you should be able to understand it.

    /watch?v=xG2y50Wyys4

    If the north towers upper block was actually colliding with the lower building it would have shown the inherent physical symptoms of slightly decreasing momentum due to the essential physical law that it would have to spend kinetic energy to destroy the floors. This same exact point is made by Ryan Mackey on Hardfire. The N.towers upper block is being demolished by controlled demo.

  • watch?v=zRs9PD6owj8&feature=vi­deo_response

  • For this guy to think that the government being stupid is scarier than it having capitulated is the part that scares me. He is clearly a tool of the coverup or ridiculously naive.

  • Comment removed

  • Just how thick was this piece of steel that was subjected to fire? Anything less than than a comparable substiutute is bad or 'junk' science- smoke and mirrors.

  • Hmmmmmm

    Lets see here

    National Geographic  is owned by News Corp (Rupert Murdoch) i do believe

    Should be a fair and balanced scientific show

    LMAO gimme a break

  • Sure it was possible to weaken the steel, where there was fire and damage from the plane impact but how did the steel below the impact and fire zone weaken? And why did nist find no physical evidence of temps high enough to weaken steel?

  • LBJ's "inside job" to sink the USS Liberty and successful mass murder of the crew was a "conspiracy theory" until the government declassified the documents to make it a historical fact.  If we are allowed to have a "history" in the future, such documents will seal the truth of the 9/11 inside job. DOn't let then get away with it. Prosecute now.

  • Wonder what this guy has to say about the gulf of tonkin...

  • inside job!

  • Thom Hartmann is the only progressive voice to bring up the 9-11 conspiracy.

  • inside job

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more