Added: 11 months ago
From: NASAHOAX
Views: 5,946
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5,284)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • NASA is just plain NASTY. It has wasted taxpayer money time and time again.

  • It's not that hard to hide a big lie in government because there are so many ways to "classify" it.

    "We're sorry. That's classified," is the biggest scam lie there is.

    If you're going to lie, make it really, really big lie. The more outrageous, the more sheeple will go along with it.

    "We are going to the moon because we choose to," said druggy JFK. Indeed, his nickname "Just For Kicks" fit his speech admirably.

  • @Glinkaism1

    Right. President Clinton couldn't get a blowjob without the world finding out a month later but a couple thousand people faked the moon landings and haven't talked yet.

  • Stimulate the economy- KILL THE RICH

  • is he related to buzz light year?

  • Could Buzz be related to Buzzy Kronagard, Cia whose former bank profited from put options on United Air Lines after 911?

  • @krisdevalle Quite, daisy

  • watch?v=G9ISxYEScC0

  • If religion were true, its followers would not try to bludgeon their young into an artificial conformity; but would merely insist on their unbending quest for truth, irrespective of artificial backgrounds or practical consequences.

    H. P. Lovecraft

  • BUZZ THE CLOWN

    $300 for his Fake autograph

  • @swfcocs1 YOU REEK OF MOTZO AND PIG SEX

  • Hoaxers Mr Bean and E.Gernan members of NASA's moonhoax talking in 2001 claim they don't know where the radiation belts are .!It's like Columbus said never saw any water.

    watch?v=TgmGZlyZObE

  • They never went to the moon.

    politicalforum (dot) com/moon-landing/190138-apollo­-moon-missions-were-faked-stud­io (dot) html

  • he can lie without moving his eyes he either is a robot or very well trained and brainwashed by the CIA. American (and world) history is a joke. 911 is a joke. the killing of osama just hours after obamas fake birth certificate is put in question is a joke. and the moon landing bluff to keep the USSR in check during cold war is exactly the same: A GIGANTIC SCAM costing billions of dollars.

  • Attention Apollotarians

    I'm giving this account away soon.

    What are you going to spend your time on when I'm gone?

  • @krisdevalle So what, don't you believe anything will happen to you if your swear on a book full of stories you don't believe in, about a god you don't believe in!!!!!

    Who the moron here, champ!!

    Try using science to defend your side of the debate. lol

    Fools follow story tales and false gods. How gullible are you, anyway?

    What do photos of relics have to do with proving man was on the moon? Do you ever think about the stupidity that you spew!!

  • @deadlyradiation What the....

    "So what, don't you believe anything will happen to you if your swear on a book full of stories you don't believe in, about a god you don't believe in!"

    What the hell does that mean?

    Are you still smoking crack and taking Oxycontin? Get off that stuff man, it has crippled your brain.

  • @Tweekerhead I think it means only gullible idiots believe a non existent god will harm them for swearing on a book full of stories about this no existent god. Are you still sucking the tit of false beliefs?

  • @ECARIZANASAN Are you still living in your Mom's...I mean Mum's basement ?

    You hoaxtards are brilliant bunch of lazy-ass half-wits, like lemmings. Go watch jarraw watch the space-shuttle launch ...LOLOLmfao

  • @Tweekerhead Not the same owner =D Take care.

  • @krisdevalle your stupidity has no limits The LRO gave us info on lunar surface apollo did not know

  • @wengsky01 You'll except the info' from the LRO as in the data of neutron radiation on the lunar surface it helped define,which BTW has a very low flux ratio,almost nil,but you reject the images the LRO sent back.

    That's par for the course, same as you hoax-nuts clinging to Van Allen's first assessment of the belts' from the primitive Explorer satellites in 1958 as the gospel, but rejecting age old properties of radiation that hasn't changed since the dawn of time.

    Must be easy to be a hoaxtard.

  • Five days silence. I have feared the comedy has stopped. But now the main actor is back to make us laugh. This is really good ;)

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap I could remind you of your earlier post that facts are backed by evidence.Is your "critical thinking" the same as conspiracy theorists claim of "thinking outside the box",which seems to consist of people dismissal of evidence as "fake",dismissal of experts as "in on it" and the instant acceptance of hoax utube vids?

  • @swfcocs1 ..Tyler is no longer with us. Another Andy clone gone awry ;)

  • @teddysalad65 I`d not spotted this clone.We really should ignore this prick.It`s obviously an ego massaging game that in some way boosts his self esteem.It`s trolling of the worst kind.It`s also dubious in the extreme when an obvious adult claims to be "13 and incredibly cut" etc.Even by twoofer standards a pyschotic sociopath with paedophile tendencies(at the very least) is beyond the pale.

  • @swfcocs1 Judgmental condescending anti-goy! 

  • @teddysalad65 <---- Why bother! lol

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap If you don't know the facts of the subject at hand, which you obviously don't, you can't have any critical analysis.

    I unlike the hoax believing community do not make up "facts", for example deadray here says that the astronaut should have been exposed 5 Sv of radiation,when asked where the proof is,he pasts physics tutorial pages that have no relation with the subject at hand.

    These facts that have an aversion to have been around before you & were born.

    I stay with facts.

  • Still squirmin' I see, still waiting to see your "proof" twoofer, that 5 Sv claim is becoming smaller and smaller, it must be moving away at a very fats speed.

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap BTW, our discussion is about attenuation of the Command Module, which was rated at 7-8g/cm². .

    So, Mr. Helper, is that enough shielding for α radiation at 100MeV w/ flux of 5x10³/cm²/sec.?

    Or do you refute these simple facts? LOL

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap Really is that so Mr. Helper, I've backed up all my claims, deadray hasn't backed up one, nada, zilch, zero.

    Where have you been, you must not be able to comprehend the figures I put down here or have no understanding for astrophysics, and BTW there has been no debate or discussion here, in case you haven't notice deadray won't let himself get mired in one.

    I've been the only one answering questions.

    When's it gonna' get "heavy" deadray? LOL

    Try and keep up junior

  • Hydrogen content ?

  • @deadlyradiation Post the TLI stats again!! LMFAO

  • Space Weather

    Effects and Consequences.

    The case of MOPITT

    on board of Terra spacecraft.

    Florian Nichitiu

    Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada

    July 2004-Frascati

  • @deadlyradiation Your turn whimpy, post the "proof" or the link. Or keep squirmin'.

  • @Tweekerhead What a Kris you are, liar2.

  • @deadlyradiation Your red herring is moot, you forgot about the 5 windows of the Command Module,. LOL

    Slow on the uptake?

  • @deadlyradiation You are a liar, if reality doesn't fit your premise, just make it up, is that how you think the world works?

    What color is the sky in your little world, is it blue like ours?

  • @deadlyradiation

    apollosaturn* com/asnr/module * htm

    hq*nasa.gov/alsj/SM2A-03-BK-II­-(1) * pdf

    .

    If you can't find it, do the math, remember 7-8g/cm² doesn't mean it was 7-8cm thick.

    How much does a block of aluminum 1cm² x2cm thick weigh idiot.

    That's the last question I wet nurse you through, now show your work on your 5 Sv exposure claim ;-)))

    Please come back and entertain me ... ;-(

  • @Tweekerhead Your link was bull, you knew it, or didn't you check your 10yr old propaganda. Page or file is outdated, renamed, moved, or does not exist.

    All debunked NASA propaganda is being pulled. lol

    >5 Sv

  • @deadlyradiation DO THE MATH.

    I told you, 7-8g/cm² doesn't mean it was 7-8cm thick.LMFAO.

    I'm gonna' leave you alone(maybe) because all of your posts reveal how little you know about astrophysics & the environment of space.

    So ever time you post the 5 Sv exposure claim, I'll just sit back and LMFAO.

    When you claim the astros' would've had 5Sv exposure,you've never said what kind of radiation you think it was,as far as I know you think it was neutron rad'.AgainLMFAO

    Don't comprehend astrophysics?

  • @deadlyradiation Your story about how no astros' can survive LEO,WRONG,again!

    You cannot escape GCR's,if you are a frequent flyer or a pilot, you'll receive more exposure than people on the ground,fact.

    Atmosphere attenuates the GCR's, but not all.

    Trust me.. there's not an evil galactic monster out there swarming around that's gonna' fry you as soon as it sees you. Less than 1%...Like piss in a ocean sport.

    If there was as much deadly GCR's as you claim, Earth would have NO Life.

    Idiot? LOL

  • @Tweekerhead It's outside LEO, kid.

    Yes there are evil galactic monsters out there, they're called deadlyradiation!

    A polygraph from the remaining Apollo astros can end this.

    Why won't they take one? Because they are frauds!

  • @deadlyradiation So you`re seriously claiming that if the surviving Apollo astronauts took a polygraph and passed you would immediately accept the truth of Apollo? putting these heroes through the farce of a polygraph wouldn`t change anything,conspiracy theorists would either claim the test as fake or move to some other piece of "evidence"

  • @swfcocs1 i smell a jew...

  • @bluemarkus That`s odd, because I can smell a racist,anti semitic,misogynistic(look it up),paranoid sociopathic conspiracy theorist.the type who whines all day about "jews" and the "illuminati" from their bedroom at their mum`s house,blaming others for the fact he`s a 30 year old virgin with no life.Keep believing in the conspiracies,you paranoid little troll.I`ll keep celebrating Apollo,one of mankinds greatest feats.

  • @swfcocs1 YOU REEK OF MOTZO AND PIG SEX

  • @AnothnysPenis Wow,yet another racist idiot conspiracy theorist blaming the jews for his non life.For the record I was raised in the C of E but since have always been an atheist.Oh and writing in CAPITALS doesn`t make you sound angry,it makes you look like a tool.the only good fascist is a dead fascist.please do the world a favour.

  • @swfcocs1 DON'T GET MAD AT ME BECAUSE YOUR MOTHER GOT CAUGHT GIVING PIGS THE DIRTY SANCHEZ

  • @AnothnysPenis What an adult remark.How old are you? Still writing in the angry CAPITALS I see,I wish you`d stop,you`re frightening me-i`m starting to think you`re really big and tough!

  • @swfcocs1 WHY DO YOU FLY A SOCIALIST FLAG DON'T YOU KNOW SOCIALISM ALWAYS FAILS! OF COURSE YOU DO JEWS FEED OFF OTHERS FAILURE.

  • @AnothnysPenis Still angry I see.If you had any understanding of politics you would know there are many different types of socialism.chavez runs a successful socialist govt in Venezuela,democratically elected and re-elected.Allende in Chile was democratically elected and only overthrown in a CIA backed fascist coup by Pinochet.The Spanish republic was democratic,and only overthrown in a nazi-backed fascist coup by Franco.You are right that some govts posing as socialist have failed,but not all.

  • @swfcocs1 SOCIALISM ALWAYS LOOKS GOOD AT FIRST AND ALWAYS FAILS RAPIDLY.

    A LASTING GOVERNMENT HAS LOWER MIDDLE AND UPPER CLASSES

    SOCIALISM DESTROYERS THE MIDDLE CLASS IN A SHORT TIME THAT'S WHY IT ALWAYS FAILS.

    THE MIDDLE CLASSES KEEP ALL GOVERNMENTS GOING.

    THE LOWER CLASSES LIVE OFF THE GOVERNMENT THE UPPER CLASSES GET ENORMOUS TAX BREAKS.

    THE MIDDLE CLASSES PAY FOR GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS.

    SOCIALISM DESTROYS THE MIDDLE CLASS

    SOCIALISM ALWAYS FAILS! 

  • @AnothnysPenis What socialist systems/govts did you study before you reached this sweeping conclusion? I teach political history for a living so studying political systems is my job.Lumping all socialist systems together is like lumping modern capitalist democracies together with Nazi Germany as both are capitalist.The vast majority of the working class don`t live off the system,do you have any stats to back your assertion?

  • @swfcocs1 SOCIALISM IS ALL THE SAME NO MATTER WHAT ATTEMPT YOU MAKE TO MISLEAD THE UNTHINKING MASSES.

  • @AnothnysPenis Try doing some research to find out who`s flag that is before you condemn it, otherwise it`s a pointless remark

  • @swfcocs1 THE FLAG PORTRAYS A SYMBOL OF SOCIALISM NO RESEARCH NEEDED

  • @AnothnysPenis How typical of a conspiracy theorist,you just make your "mind" up and dismiss all evidence as unnecessary.You guys are like creationists,you believe what you`re told and ignore all evidence that disproves that position.You ignored my question about how many socialist systems you`ve studied so i`ll presume it`s what I thought-none.Enjoy "living" in the dark little man.

  • @swfcocs1 the propaganda monkey, trolling youtube nasa fake videos for $10 a day

    dumb pervert

  • @swfcocs1 ...AnothysPenis ....(he can't even spell his name correctly) used to be Deadlyradiation before he deleted the account out of shame. He also goes by the names NASANAZIRACE, Tweakerhead, BennyBeenThere, JimmyClangClang, 99thMonkey, MyHairyBreasts, JustinBeaverCleaver, LLnuLLy and a few more. This is not speculation on my part. Giving you a heads up on a man who has serious mental problems.

  • @teddysalad65 Thanks for the info.The guy was starting to ring some alarm bells with his terminology and obvious anger issues.You get a strange sense of deja vu with these multi account sock puppets,they`re too angry and impulsive to change their writing style,the same old issues always seem to leak through!

    cheers

  • @swfcocs1 The flag you have as an icon has a hammer and sickle.

    The hammer & sickle was a symbol of the socialist movement signifying the alliance of workers and peasants. Placing the tools together symbolised unity between agricultural and industrial workers. It also glorified harsh manual labor dictated by the socialist government.

  • The Hammer and Sickle of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics illustrates how the National Socialist German Workers' Party came to use the swastika as intertwined "S" shapes symbolizing "Socialism" for the monstrous National Socialists in Germany.

    The Nazi-Sozi word for "swastika" was "Hakenkreuz" ("hooked cross" or "armed cross").

  • @GrowingFooling Hitler placed the term socialist in his party name for cynical electoral motives.The use of a name doesn`t suignify the party adheres to this policy.The chinese army is called the "peoples liberation army" but they are hardly liberating the people whilst crushing internal opposition.East germany named itself the "German democratic republic",were they democratic? These terms are used cynically,as was socialist in the reich.Hitler dealt with big business from the start

  • @swfcocs1 So go soak your head in buttermilk.

  • @Glinkaism1 I like buttermilk

  • @GrowingFooling The flag I use is the symbol of the POUM,an anti stalin militia who fought against Franco`s fascist uprising during the Spanish civil war.They were crushed by Stalins secret police during fighting within the Republican side in Barcelona during the civil war.Their leaders were tortured and murdered by Stalins goons.They were politically closer to Trotsky`s policies than the appalling crimes of the Stalinist state.Many kinds of socialism don`t promote the tactics you mention

  • @swfcocs1

    Trotsky was a Marxist scumbag and so are you.

  • @NASAHOAX Trotsky was a marxist,you are correct.However,any reading of his works proves he was strongly against the kind of brutall represion repeatedly used by the Stalinist state Stalin.For his troubles he recieved an ice pick to the brain by one of Stalins henchmen.You criticize my politics but offer no alternative.I`ll ignore the infantile insult as it`s unworthy of response.

  • @swfcocs1 Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union

  • @bluemarkus I SMELL IT TOO.

  • @Tweekerhead link, dodgy.

  • No we see the so called expert at astrophysics hide and evade any questions about his feeble claims.....squirm, hide and run.

    5Sv..???/ LOLOL what an imagination.

  • @Tweekerhead Link, kiddo?

  • @Tweekerhead Where's that link, kiddo?

  • @Tweekerhead "I'll give you more than the link to what you want."

    Still waiting, kiddo. lol

    Link .....

  • Search Apollo by the numbers by Richard Orloff.

    Or use any of these links.

    history . nasa . go v/SP-4029/SP-4029 . htm

    history . nasa . go v/SP-4029/Apollo_00a_Cover . htm

    history . nasa . go v/SP-4029/Apollo_00g_Table_of_­Contents . htm

    georgetyson . co m/files/apollostatistics . pdf

  • @deadlyradiation Wait here for a minute, and I'll give you more than the link to what you want. Just a minute.

  • @Tweekerhead All the stats are listed here and in APOLLO BY NUMBERS.

    Stop acting stupider, than anyone could possibly be.

  • @deadlyradiation  Here's news kid, credibility is not yours to grant, OK. Go read a book.

  • @Tweekerhead Do you know what a link is?

    Look up, idiot.

    Now, give me a link to 7-8g/cm2.

    If you can't,

    "credibility" ??

    Next ....

  • @Tweekerhead That's why I said mum, European, kid.

    Are you really that slow! Not a question, don't answer.

  • @deadlyradiation When you posted the TLI stats', you didn't figure out exactly what they meant, you could've had someone with a little astronomy background help you. LOL

  • @Tweekerhead That makes perfect sense, you can't say anything, that hasn't been scripted for you already.

    Kinda dumb, for someone claiming, they worked on the "Fly's Eye".

    You lose, always. lol

  • @Tweekerhead All has been backed up, kiddo.

    Post the 7-8g/cm2, link.

    That's who the idiot is. lol

  • @deadlyradiation No ...you haven't backed up one single stupid claim you've made. Stop putting on a show poser. Nobody cares.

    Go find the link yourself, the onus is on you in case you haven't figured it out yet.

  • @Tweekerhead You wait by the computer, for me to reply, like a ugly schoolgirl waiting for a boy to call. Too funny.

    Life, it's what happens, while you watch television, with mum.

    Next......

  • Does anybody have a link that says, 7-8g/cm2, for the CM? Or is it like I thought, more parroting of propaganda, that none of you really understand? lol

  • @deadlyradiation If you would like to have a civil discussion on your assumptions I'm all for it. But it's obvious you don't want to get mired in a debate you can't possibly handle intellectually, so you keep going on with the name calling and fallacious arguments and I'll keep on laughing at you ;-))))

  • @Tweekerhead If you want to give the source "link", directly to your "fluffed" claim of 7-8g/cm2, we'll continue. Until then, you hold zero credibility, kiddo.

  • @Tweekerhead Not name calling, pointing out that you're an idiot. You never never win anything, kiddo. lol

  • @Tweekerhead "12,000lbs. doesn't have enough shielding for 100MeV rad'"

    You're an idiot.

  • @Tweekerhead Give me the link, cry baby. Nothing coming for me, until you provide this 1 link. You just made it up, like all your other lies.

    Can you provide a "link"?

  • @Tweekerhead What is your source "7-8g/cm²"? Don't try to lie to me, kid, I know what I'm talking about. I proved you a liar, just like Kris is.

  • @Tweekerhead The link for "7-8g/cm2" . lol

    Spinning those wheels again. lol

  • @deadlyradiation My source is NASA, I told you before.

    Slow on the uptake?

    Look in the link you love to cut & paste the Apollo 11 trajectory from, Robert A. Baeunig's page, which actually proves they flew around the inner intense part VA belts & encountered protons w/energies of ≥100MeV w/ flux of 10³/cm²/sec. for a few minutes,that went over your head as well as others you've posted here!

    You obviously didn't comprehend the A11 trajectory when you posted it, otherwise you would've known this.

  • @Tweekerhead Give a link, more refined than, NASA. lol

    Baeunig's page, sources from APOLLO BY NUMBERS.

    I've given you links, dropped the name, Apollo by numbers, you still can't find your way to truth.

    Got that link saying 7-8g/cm2 ? lol

  • @deadlyradiation Got the link that says 2g/cm² ?

    Is it from Australia? LOLOL

    "the truth" is you haven't nor can you back up anything you've asserted here, not ONE THING. LOL

    .

    Why do you think space travel is impossible outside "the Earth's protective layers"?

  • @Tweekerhead nerdy fuk

  • @FuckingBitchDog He's a kid, trying to "act" smart. Ask him some questions, watch him come back with a paste job. If he can find one! lol

  • @Tweekerhead Post the link wheel spinner. I don't have time to play, I busy with my publicist.

    7-8g/cm2 ?

  • @deadlyradiation Hahahahaha ... Busy with your children's book?

    .

    Why is space travel impossible out of earth's protective layers?

    ;-)))

  • Maybe we didn't says Mr Bean

    watch?v=TgmGZlyZObE

  • The Military Academic Complex Exist

  • @MilitaryAcademicComp Damn right it does, it's why these jokers are blinded.

  • @deadlyradiation Look, all you gotta do is write up your paper, submit it to a journal, and you've nailed it. Why the delay? Having a peer-reviewed paper in a reputable science journal is going to shut all your critics up, and prove beyond a doubt that you know what you're talking about. Why the wait?

  • @krisdevalle .......>"@deadlyradiation Look, all you gotta do is write up your paper, submit it to a journal, and you've nailed it. Why the delay?"<

    ________________

    In all fairness Kris, he's sent it in to Ignoramus Illustrated 6 times so far without any luck. Even they think its too silly to print. I told deadrad to try Retard Review but he's too nervous to try.

  • @teddysalad65 Dude's gonna be beating his drum the same way a year from now, or he will have given up. Oh I guess there's option three; go even crazier.

  • @krisdevalle What are you going to be doing a year from now. Same thing you have done since, Sep 13, 2006?

    What have you done in the passed 5 yrs? Looked for somebody to hold your hand, explaining all that you don't understand? Or pasting more bullshit, that I have proved to be lies, over a month ago?

  • @deadlyradiation Got married, toured South America & Italy, visited Holland, Hong Kong, China, the US, Taiwan, learned to DJ and beatmix, rollerskate, MC'd at Rollerderby, changed jobs to a higher pay grade, trained dozens of people around the world, published short stories and all the while, asked fuckups like you why you languish on youtube with your crazy theories instead of proving them for real. Really, it's not hard to keep tabs on the crazies.

  • @krisdevalle Oh, garbage man was a step up. You told me you were a garbage man. What were you before that?

    "published short stories"

    Give me a source for them. lol

    You're are full of bull, like cry baby tweeker.

  • @deadlyradiation So are you, cockwipe. You haven't proven you've done a jot of work at all, and when challenged, get all pissy about it. You believe things only when they are convenient to you or satisfying, like me saying I was a garbageman. You didn't believe I was married, and when I proved it, you stole the photo only to deface it. You can go and fuck yourself if you want anything more from me.

    I give proof; you fuck about. What have YOU been doing in the last five years?

  • @krisdevalle What's up with the name calling, girl. Not my fault you feel the need to "prove" to me, you are who you "say" you are. What does that say to me about you? lol Fake! I hope you and your husband are happy. lol "proven you've done a jot of work" You have proved, you can't do a jot of work, related to Astrophysics.

    The "proof" you think you are giving, is propaganda, you don't understand. Haven't I shown you how "much" of it is lies, you're foolishly, parrot?

  • @deadlyradiation No.

    You vaguely point to a few online resources, and expect that to stand as proof. You call the accepted, tested data propaganda without ever showing why.

    And then you lack the balls to have your work checked by people who know what they are talking about. This is the most telling thing about you ; you hide here on youtube instead of running any of your bullshit past even amateur physicists online. Weak.

  • @krisdevalle That's just it, champ, you have to "do your own work", or rattle off bull, like you understand it. lol

    You don't know, who has reviewed my work. Just because I won't abide by you and submit it to some wannabes on some dumb space blog, doesn't mean I haven't had real "professionals" look over my work. I know you look up to the internet bloggers, why else would you spend 24/7 online! Does Dr Michio Kaku submit his work to your space buddies? lol

  • @deadlyradiation ww w. physicsforums. com/index. php

    You wouldn't dare to start any shit here, because you would get laughed out of town. Prove me wrong.

  • @krisdevalle I don't care about your blog buddies. Do you speak English?

  • @deadlyradiation Very well; you may languish in obscurity on youtube, ranting about how you've done the work, and never showing that you have.

    The very fact you shy from actual scientists shows quite clearly you have fuck all.

    Say, does Dr Michio Kaku believe in a hoax?

    Anyway, only last week you said you were getting ready to publish and your 'publicist' told you to hush up. You couldn't lie straight in a bed, man.

  • @krisdevalle Odd that every time when asked to back up or to simply explain his wacky claims he gets more nervous than a long-tailed cat in a room full-o-rockin' chairs and runs away for several days hoping we'll forget and telling himself how he tried to hold our hand or humiliated us into submission.

    You were dead-on with the Dunning-Kruger effect diagnosis Kris.

    Can't wait to see his manifesto, think it will come out in "AIAA Journal" or "The Astrophysical Journal "?

  • @Tweekerhead It is plainly evident he has nothing, or close to it. I've actually seen one or two hoaxdicks who have had the balls to go onto the baut forum or a physics page, and they get their ass handed to them, every single time.

    So yeah, our brilliant self-taught physicist will be pissing on about this on youtube forever, and I will delightfully remind him of it.

  • @teddysalad65 His paper should have a cover like a "Mega Death" album cover, then he can proselytize young angry disenfranchised boys to his camp.

  • @Tweekerhead @Tweekerhead "Megadeth" wouldn't be so far fetched, like "you" think it would.

    1 million deaths. Used as a unit in reference to nuclear warfare resulting in and Mega deaths from deadly radiation

    Send 1 million humans beyond LEO, you'll have Megadeth. lol

  • @deadlyradiation Ya' sure NASA hasn't sent anyone beyond LEO but the Russians could send Zond 5 for a lunar fly-by with all of it's biological payload still ALIVE upon return to Earth in 1968.

    .

    Could you post the Apollo 11 trajectory stats' again?

    I have an astronomer friend who wouldn't believe me when I told him there is this Hoax-Nut on Y-Tube posting the trajectory of A1.

    He said the same thing I said, too funny a hoaxer would show proof that A11 went basically around the VA belts.

    Oops...

  • @Tweekerhead Link piss ant?

  • @Tweekerhead See Apollo by numbers, kid, or read all the proof you want, in this video's comments, or the comments on, watch?v=803Oa0CpJ4s . How many times do I have to tell you? You don't have to make up stories, that you have a friend. lol

    > 5Sv !

    Still laughing, you have a friend!

  • @deadlyradiation Humans can survive beyond LEO, you just have to have the proper shielding.

  • @Tweekerhead Too bad Apollo was "properly shielded", for human survival.

    watch?v=803Oa0CpJ4s

    Until "effective" shielding is found, man will be confined to LEO space travels. lol

  • @deadlyradiation *wasn't

    Before you play some stupid word game.

  • @deadlyradiation You've elevated yourself to a great importance, what other limitations are you considering putting on mankind besides space travel?

  • @Tweekerhead I didn't put the limitations there, deadly radiation is not a product of mine. Take it up with space. lol

    Maybe you can yell at the moon with buzz aldrin. lol

  • @teddysalad65 Is that where you are featured? lol

  • @krisdevalle I don't need any help from you, champ. I did my own work. lol

  • Look at all the morons this place needs a good flushing.

  • @Tweekerhead Still squirming, I see.

  • @deadlyradiation no, you just blocked me that's all. I got the facts straight,not you I'm afraid.

  • @Rob260259 Ah,the VA belts-that old chestnut! These guys keep pulling out these old classics.The clavius site has got a letter from James Van Allen refuting these nonsense.To no-one`s surprise,however,it is instantly dismissed as a hoax.These guys-so sadly predictable!

  • @swfcocs1 watch?v=803Oa0CpJ4s

  • @NASAHOAX Thanks for the pointer to the vid-interesting stuff.I fail to see how it applies to Apollo though,they are refering to long term exposure.An obvious analogy would be the x-ray dept at hospital.The patient is ok because their exposure is short term,but the staff need to wear protective gear because of their long term exposure

  • @swfcocs1 < --- jewish propagandist < ---- socialist too :(

  • @Tweekerhead TweekerheadSon ?

    You said apollo had an attenuation rating of 7-8g/cm. Did you make that up? You won't give me a link you must of made it up.

  • Tweek you liar.

    "BTW...I lied, I'm not a musician, just wanted to see how predictable you are.

    I'm a PhD from MIT, I worked for Dr. Pierre Sokolsky at the "Fly's Eye" observation post in 2000-2004.

    You're an idiot, you got all wrong kid, Good luck.....LOL "

    Tweekerhead

  • @NASAHOAX

    Moonhoax: deadly radiation

    watch?v=393iNyhMqVY

    .

  • @Rob260259

    Van Allen Belts

    watch?v=JLk7L3BPVlQ

  • @Tweekerhead You said do you really think making a craft that's over 12,000 lbs.with the shielding 7-8g/cm impossible? No I don't think its impossible to make but you have to get it off the ground. That's why weigh was the main issue. You said apollo had an attenuation rating of 7-8g/cm. Now you refuse to give me a source. I gave you my source of what I said. I am telling the truth you are a squabbling child that I will ignore from now on.

  • @Rob260259 As retarded as twooferhead

  • @Tweekerhead The retarded 10yr old

  • High on me

    WINNING

    Trolls are finished

    sizzle losing bye

  • "During times of universal deceit,

    telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."

    -- George Orwell

  • @Rob260259 You're dumb.

  • @bennybeenthere

    That could be, but Tweekerhead is still right.

  • @Rob260259 Too dumb to know tweekerhead is dumb and wrong TOO.

  • @bennybeenthere

    That could be the case yes. But still, the landings on the Moon were real and reality. Only self absorbed fools think they outsmart 40+ years of science and engineering. And it seems to me you are one of those fools.

    Try to prove it was all fake, instead of parroting conspiritards and twoofers.

  • @Rob260259 = tweekerhead

  • @bennybeenthere

    Thank you for the compliment.

  • @Rob260259 That is proof enough.

  • @bennybeenthere

    Ofcourse. The same kind of 'proof' you see in a refusal by an astronaut to swear on a bible.

  • Aluminum 2g/cm2 will not protect an Astro from the deadly radiation in the VABs, Cislunar space and the radioactive surface of the moon.

  • @Tweekerhead " I wish I could have you in a live debate"

    Name the time and place, kid, name the time and place.

    You won't be able to dodge "every" question.

    Don't you want to tell me what .7 K equals in the other listed scales, what's wrong, can't find a place to copy it from?

    Source for "7-8g/cm²", squabbling baby?

  • @Tweekerhead There is no link to the >5 Sv, it requires math, something that you are afraid of.

    Source for "7-8g/cm²", squabbling baby?

    And your flux ratios and energies are wrong, take it up with NASA, squabbly.

  • Everyone should have knowledge about the universe and nature and our relations to it. those who doesnt miss out on the real world..