Epreuve de force entre la recherche maximale de profit des plus riches de la planète et de la préservation de notre environnement dans le cadre d'une justice sociale et démocratique.
Quelqu'un sait qui est la 3eme personne sur les "bannieres" du debut, je sais plus qd il chante, c'est dans les grandes affiches apres la vue du carrefour ^^
This morning on ABC Radio national (Artworks interview) Peter Garrett agreed that the Dry Riverbank version was a bit "sugary sweet", but it was for a "good cause".
Lyrics for the tck tck version were submitted to him, which he then rewrote, and they sang those, Garrett's new lyrics.
He also said that he did not perform on the new version because he was "very busy" with his ministerial commitments.
Peter Garrett is a genius singer/ songwriter + lawyer and politician.
Mais bien sur... Remarque, entre voir des dechets humains gesticuler et en lire un déblatérer ses conneries, je me demande laquelle des deux options serait la plus instructive pour moi...
De plus, avec un minimum de jugeote, tu comprendra sans trop (j'espere) de difficulté qu'on arrive a mieu véhiculer un message avec un air connu qu'avec un air nouveau. J'espere que ton petit esprit bien fermé arrivera tout de même a comprendre cela.
tucker59000 > La question n'est pas "d'originale" ou quoi que ce soit, ce sont les paroles qui ont un impact.
C'est uniquement pour ça que la chanson a été reprise. Que tu préfères l'originale, c'est ton choix. Mais il n'y a pas de "nullité" dans cette reprise, seules les paroles comptes.
pfff il aurait pu crée une nouvelle chanson si veulent réveillé les consciences, l'orignal est vraiment supérieur à celle là !! retourne à ta star académie et toutes les merde qui à coté !
Tsss tucker, cette chanson n'est pas la pour attirer des fonds, mais pour attirer des gens; elle est utilisée pour sensibiliser l'opinion public sur un sujet plus que d'actualité. Je pense qu'a ce niveau la, il faut savoir tolérer une reprise; surtout quand elle est d'une assez bonne qualité.
J'aimerai savoir, si quelqu'un sait, qui est le chanteur a 0:55 jusqu'a 0:58?
Yes it is difficult to know for sure, but to me it looks like Youssou N'Dour. He is a singer and an actor from Senegal.
I first saw him playing the role of Olaudah Equiano in Amazing Grace, a film about the abolition of slavery in Britain. Both his acting and singing are remarkable.
[Please excuse me for not being able to reply to you en Francais.]
Thanks ParArdua for your answer, and don't worry, i'm able to understand English ;)
But I think we have misunderstood each other, I wasn't talking about Youssou N'Dour (I didn't know he's an actor by the way) but i was talking about the (white) dark long hair guy, who repeats "It's a fact, It's a fact" at the fifty sixth second.
Way to steal a midnight oil song. This song is about Abo rights not mythical global warming claims. How many of these people are scientists? Al gore, obama, kevin rudd?
hmmm...I wouldn't use "ruining" but "revisiting" instead. The classic "nosayer" attitude. the classic exists, feel free to listen this one only. I quite like this little excerpt, and I really like the original - will wait to listen more. Anyway, they've done something for a cause, instead of doing nothing for nothing.
Climate change is constant: From 20,000 years ago to 8,000 years ago, oceans levels rose 120 metres to today's levels. Soon after that, they rose higher than today's levels for a short time, before receding to current levels. If archeological evidence showed that the ancient cultures, who lived in the cities now underwater, had recorded a song to stop the climate changes, we would recognise it for the superstition it was. History shows we can't stop climate change; human creativity can adapt.
The time has indeed come for people to start recognizing that despite computer simulations of the climate which show temperature is rising at an alarming rate, that the actual temperature measurements have been dropping for more than a decade. The time has come to stop blindly listening to political panels who declare scientific debate to be over, when thousands upon thousands of scientists worldwide point to a total lack of empirical evidence of global warming.
That's interesting, I would love to know the "thousands upon thousands of scientists" who have said so... Because there these things called science academies and scientific societies, where they do things like assess current scientific opinion. The Scientific consensus (Which is the collective judgement, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study) on global warming hasn't really changed since 1995
How Can I help ?
Yogimeisters 4 months ago
Crimen Sollicitationis
tokyo1r 9 months ago
imádom!
larababa1 1 year ago
Great song, crap version..
ellensboy4 1 year ago
Lol i love this song we are going to sing it in my school consert!
Safooy1000 1 year ago
gringos mascones!!
charlymancini1985 2 years ago
gringos masca huasca!!
charlymancini1985 2 years ago
who is the woman singing at 0:46
freakedhelle 2 years ago
her name is serena ryder 0:48
fabilu7 2 years ago
she isnt srene ryder. anyone know?! who is the girl in 0;48? please i must know! she has a bautiful voice!
Evitenny 2 years ago
@Evitenny - Yes She is SERENA RYDER
carlopetox 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Epreuve de force entre la recherche maximale de profit des plus riches de la planète et de la préservation de notre environnement dans le cadre d'une justice sociale et démocratique.
saintjustrevient 2 years ago
Comment removed
saintjustrevient 2 years ago
Yes Time Has Come !
Nevertheless, nothing has changed in most people's behaviour.
Just have a look at the seasides in The Golfe of Morbihan with all its rubbish...
I am deeply horrified every time I notice people still let their rubbish on the beach !
Karine130270 2 years ago
Anyone know who the girl at 0:48 is?
lonebard 2 years ago
@lonebard : her name is Serena Ryder.
ferrer7972 2 years ago
J'aime bien cette chanson reprise comme ça ! ♥
Quelqu'un sait qui est la 3eme personne sur les "bannieres" du debut, je sais plus qd il chante, c'est dans les grandes affiches apres la vue du carrefour ^^
TheCelined 2 years ago
Ahhh tha's it! Thanks for your answer!
Have a nice evening!
louantdel 2 years ago
What a pansy adaption of a good song!
Jerram89 2 years ago
This morning on ABC Radio national (Artworks interview) Peter Garrett agreed that the Dry Riverbank version was a bit "sugary sweet", but it was for a "good cause".
Lyrics for the tck tck version were submitted to him, which he then rewrote, and they sang those, Garrett's new lyrics.
He also said that he did not perform on the new version because he was "very busy" with his ministerial commitments.
Peter Garrett is a genius singer/ songwriter + lawyer and politician.
ParArdua 2 years ago 2
great to see Simon Le Bon showing his support :)
splashon7 2 years ago
Je dirais oui d'un coté et non de l'autre car les artistes aujourd'hui recherchent trop la facilité (et après ils s'étonnent de pas vendre....)
tucker59000 2 years ago
Mais bien sur... Remarque, entre voir des dechets humains gesticuler et en lire un déblatérer ses conneries, je me demande laquelle des deux options serait la plus instructive pour moi...
De plus, avec un minimum de jugeote, tu comprendra sans trop (j'espere) de difficulté qu'on arrive a mieu véhiculer un message avec un air connu qu'avec un air nouveau. J'espere que ton petit esprit bien fermé arrivera tout de même a comprendre cela.
louantdel 2 years ago 5
tucker59000 > La question n'est pas "d'originale" ou quoi que ce soit, ce sont les paroles qui ont un impact.
C'est uniquement pour ça que la chanson a été reprise. Que tu préfères l'originale, c'est ton choix. Mais il n'y a pas de "nullité" dans cette reprise, seules les paroles comptes.
KeiRan37 2 years ago 3
pfff il aurait pu crée une nouvelle chanson si veulent réveillé les consciences, l'orignal est vraiment supérieur à celle là !! retourne à ta star académie et toutes les merde qui à coté !
tucker59000 2 years ago
@tucker59000 Go apprendre l'anglais ;)
Zennever 1 year ago
Tsss tucker, cette chanson n'est pas la pour attirer des fonds, mais pour attirer des gens; elle est utilisée pour sensibiliser l'opinion public sur un sujet plus que d'actualité. Je pense qu'a ce niveau la, il faut savoir tolérer une reprise; surtout quand elle est d'une assez bonne qualité.
J'aimerai savoir, si quelqu'un sait, qui est le chanteur a 0:55 jusqu'a 0:58?
Merci,
louantdel.
louantdel 2 years ago 3
louantdel
Yes it is difficult to know for sure, but to me it looks like Youssou N'Dour. He is a singer and an actor from Senegal.
I first saw him playing the role of Olaudah Equiano in Amazing Grace, a film about the abolition of slavery in Britain. Both his acting and singing are remarkable.
[Please excuse me for not being able to reply to you en Francais.]
ParArdua 2 years ago
Thanks ParArdua for your answer, and don't worry, i'm able to understand English ;)
But I think we have misunderstood each other, I wasn't talking about Youssou N'Dour (I didn't know he's an actor by the way) but i was talking about the (white) dark long hair guy, who repeats "It's a fact, It's a fact" at the fifty sixth second.
Thanks!
louantdel 2 years ago
louantdel I think he's called Jaimie Burke
Lead1974 2 years ago
le but est d'attirer des gens certes .. mais surtout leur faire un gros coup de pub .
tawaiquos 2 years ago
Nul mais nul cela vaut absolument pas la version original !!!
tucker59000 2 years ago
Comment removed
cshadowb 2 years ago
Who's the girl at 0:41 and 1:10 ? Plzzzzzz
KeiRan37 2 years ago
Way to steal a midnight oil song. This song is about Abo rights not mythical global warming claims. How many of these people are scientists? Al gore, obama, kevin rudd?
ryno99 2 years ago
who are the two guys with long hair? at 0:55 and 0:57
violetextract 2 years ago
This is great,
Go Go Go nature lovers !!
FranceOnly 2 years ago 7
la chine et poutine les emmerdent bien fort !
les tortues aussi !
ARAGORN2678 2 years ago
I think is great
je pense que c'est une bonne idée, et que sa va être quelque chose de grand !!
pulco14 2 years ago 3
they have truly crucified a classic song ... awful ...
RFTTE 2 years ago
hmmm...I wouldn't use "ruining" but "revisiting" instead. The classic "nosayer" attitude. the classic exists, feel free to listen this one only. I quite like this little excerpt, and I really like the original - will wait to listen more. Anyway, they've done something for a cause, instead of doing nothing for nothing.
Lead1974 2 years ago 2
Ruined the song. The campaign is too cheesy.
poiuytres 2 years ago
Climate change is constant: From 20,000 years ago to 8,000 years ago, oceans levels rose 120 metres to today's levels. Soon after that, they rose higher than today's levels for a short time, before receding to current levels. If archeological evidence showed that the ancient cultures, who lived in the cities now underwater, had recorded a song to stop the climate changes, we would recognise it for the superstition it was. History shows we can't stop climate change; human creativity can adapt.
ar30w3b33 2 years ago
The time has indeed come for people to start recognizing that despite computer simulations of the climate which show temperature is rising at an alarming rate, that the actual temperature measurements have been dropping for more than a decade. The time has come to stop blindly listening to political panels who declare scientific debate to be over, when thousands upon thousands of scientists worldwide point to a total lack of empirical evidence of global warming.
mainusch 2 years ago
That's interesting, I would love to know the "thousands upon thousands of scientists" who have said so... Because there these things called science academies and scientific societies, where they do things like assess current scientific opinion. The Scientific consensus (Which is the collective judgement, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study) on global warming hasn't really changed since 1995
sypin 2 years ago 2
MissNovemberTuesday said it first
vivdiva 2 years ago
Aside from a good cause, if Simon Le Bon is part of this, just let me know what I can buy and when. CD, DVD, whatever is available.
MissNovemberTuesday 2 years ago 2
tck tck tck..join this campaign
ricardo200x 2 years ago
Amazing. Good music, good cause. I want to see it full version!
daniellebambace 2 years ago 3
You can here the full track on the myspace page...
sypin 2 years ago
a great song for a great decision merci !
grangier76 2 years ago 3