WTF??!!! J-10 and J-11B is included while the more advanced Su-27, MiG-29 and MiG-30 is not included?!? he also missed to mention the Su-47 and MiG 1.44 since he has not mentioned that it should be in active service.
wot the fuck j-11b better than eurofighter EF is defo 2nd best in the world it could even be one because it beat the f-22 in a dogfight and the f-22 never beat the EF
Je sais que cette vidéo date de 2009 mais il n'y a même pas le Rafale... Encore du french bashing, mais à la sauce chinoise cette fois ci! N'importe quoi! :(
j-11 better than an f-15k, strike eagle or silent eagle????? right, its just a copy of an su27. a mig 35 would destroy an su 27 in a sec india same thing expor su 30 mkII is export version of su-27... i could buy an SU-27 for 5 million US each cmon.... su-35 is nice though
Nice video - only thing is Chinas planes are Cheap Copies of Isreali and russian planes Can't even be consider Chinese - But they do make Great remotes -
i do not agree with all of you guys why do you like only one aircraft and u only want that to be the best and you say that others suck its so wrong you should be for all aircraft i like the f 22 but i don't think only the f 22 can defeat our enemies its so wrong how you think like the f 22 is a dog fighter but what about strike aircraft,mluti role, electronic warfare what about them thats why we need all of our planes it doesn't matter is it srong or not its about the skills of the pilot
@HerculesRockefellerr mistake: old russian stuff. the new ones are actually quite good, the problem is though, we have no money to buy them in sufficient numbers. It would be quite naive to think that those dictators, etc. receive the newest weapons and ammunition.
Chinese fighter planes!? I didn`t know then, it seems like home versions of eurofighter and su-35. Good for Chine, while they have their own planes , here in Brazil we are trying to buy only 36 fighters since 1998, Brazilian air force wants the f-18 and the congress (i don`t know why) pressures for then accept french war thrash while our fleet gets older and older...
If the Rafale is a trash, India wouldn't choose it for THE BIGGEST CONTRACT OF THE HISTORY of Aeronautic. India is on the way to buy 126 Planes, 126 Dassault Rafale for 10 billion dollars.
You President, Dilma Rousseff said that Bresil would probably choose the Rafale too.
The Dassault Rafale is better than,
F-14, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-35, SAAB Gripen, Eurofighter Typhoon, SU-30 and above, Mig-35 and above.
optronics and spectra allow to bridge the difference in scope between the radar f2 and rafale the question is who will see another first, this one will win.
Remember that the F22 stealth loses when it opens its vaults. and in close combat everything happens very very quickly here rafale becomes the best---- BOOM
@ctulluh50 the missile bay doors are open for less than 1 second upon firing a missile. no radar on earth can detect, track, lock, and fire on an aircraft in less than 1 second(that is assuming the pilot has machine like reflexes).
a plane that is semi-stealth without spectra and fully with it , an aircraft that is combat proven, that system has a best perform data fusion and of course the best of all other optronics.
this is very strange indeed not to mention therafalet just eliminate the F18 and EF in a "very extensive competition comporatnt over 600 evaluation points,
A very curious listing; I'm always interested in other people are thinking ... That said, you ignore (or are unaware of) one small but critical fact; namely, export versions of American aircraft are NOT the same models flown by U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy pilots ...
Su 30, 35 are same ...they are just modified according to the requirements of the countries..like Su 30 mki for india and mkk for china ..the mki ver being upgraded to current su 35 standards..
F 22 -- never saw an air war , onboard life support system found to be problematic , officially stopped from being produced , Flight hours being reduced to 1/3 , cost of maintenance and manf. very high , In 2012 it will only perform in air shows and tech demonstrator and yet no. 1 ..good ..:D
@HerculesRockefellerr you are absolutely correct ..neither of them saw an air war because they never got a chance to combat in any war, on the other hand USAF could have used F22 in Iraq, Afghanistan or in Libya (just for demo of fire power if not for Air sup) + Sukhois are still in production ..and Su 27 crashed into a crowd O_O not 30 or 35 ..
@HerculesRockefellerr you may think that i am making up stories about F 22 but this is reality . Read it , its all over the net ...F 22 was a better fighter ...not now ..esp when countries are coming up with something new and better u_u
@MrKasperabhay Russia always talks up its fighters but when the real shooting starts they are always the ones on the ground in flames on CNN...FACT...you know its true!
Oh so it was only the SU-27 that crashes into crowds at air shows...thanks for clearing that up...LOL. Speaking of maintence russia has a hard time even keeping spare parts for its fighters in stock.
@HerculesRockefellerr no ..i don't think so ..Russian fighters in control of skilled pilots can be lethal ..we all know how American super advanced jets were massacred in Vietnam ...and i am talking about Vietnamese flying those Russian(soviet) planes ..no wonder why there are so many Aces in their Air force ...spare parts ..not a problem ..you'll get as many if you have money ...-__- its not like spare parts are not available for Russian jets at all..
f-22 is the best of the best for this generation it literally defies gravity can do tighter turns than an f-16 with less g-force cuz of its shape im also in afrotc training specializing in f-22's
I'm sorry, but the F22 may be the most technologically advanced, but cost effectiveness should be considered, 1 F22 costs twice as much as 1 EuroFighter Typhoon, this dogfight would obviously never happen as the US and UK are mad tight, but only 1 Typhoon would need to lock onto the F22 in order for both Typhoons to fire at it, there's a reason F22 production has been stopped in favour of the F35, it's inefficient and unnecessary.
@DailyStaley Uhm, well they do operate the Admiral Kuznetsov, which carry Su-33s and Kamovs. They plan to replace the Su-33s with 29 MiG-29Ks after a refit this year.
This is really stupid. Everyone knows that the Su-35 is superior to the F-22. The Su-35 is the best in maneuver but the Raptor even can't engage in aerial combat. Russia is powerfull in air, and the USA on ground. They can destroy each other whenever they want with those nukes.
the Japanese chose the f-35 over the euro fighter the south Koreans chose the f-35 over the t50 non us countries then implie that our aircraft are the best
the f-22 is the best no question about it . the j-20s and t50s use 30 year old tech because most of it came off of a crashed f117 which are already replaced here in america
@tonymultani But links doesn't works... bad for youtube... I can only say sorry for US sophisticated aircraft : some exemples 2009 - Air Tactical Leadership Course (ATLC) : Rafale versus Typhoon (eurofighter) : 4-0 and 3-1
Rafale versus F22 : 6 matches.... F22 win only one
Nevest report... from an US newpaper (DEW line) : Rafale beats F-35 & F-22 in Flight International (another victory)
And many other reports, search on google, easy to find.
But F35 and F22 are not really bad aircraft, they are too new to be completly efficient, and matches are very close against rafale... and perhaps french pilots have more experience and ... "french touch"... with time i thinks US aircraft will dominate ATLC.
For information, Rafale is the last Fighter Aircraft for Dassault and for France : Futur is Dassault nEUROn : a Fighting advanced UCAV
Well, nothing about how much the maintains cost are. Nothing about if the plane can use each others radar. And nothing about how well trained the pilotes are.
Look at JAS 39 Gripen, and in just a few years JAS next generation.
I appreciate that you're a loyalist of F-22 Raptor but the point here is... The advantage of 22's is only by technology. While F-15 has it's great capability in modern combat in almost 3 decades. I guest Raptor must be in the second place. And as of now F-35 Lightning II have everything that every aircraft have.
Alright, I just saw the rankings and i'm still laughing. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that whoever created this list is from China? Lol!! Even though I know lists like these are subjective and everyone in the world hates the U.S., but comon! I think it's funny how certain fighters are claimed as made in China, but their Russian made fighters. I also love how the best fighter, the F-22, got a disavantage caption.If your going to be consistant, give every fighter a diavantage caption.
@mrbyron969: The F-15K Slam Eagle is a modified F-15 Eagle. The South Korean could choose between SU-35, Eurofighter Typhoon, Rafale & F-15K. And they have chosen the F-15K.
most of the planes in the top 4 places except for the f22 are on the bottom of all the other lists, and are there disadvantages on the f22 and not on the other planes?
Rafale ? not enough good ? What did you smoke guy ? It's the better fighter in the world ! He's widely superior to all theses fucking planes in your ranking except perhaps to the f22 raptor but equals ! Pffff....
fail video the f22 is a shit of a plane it only can carry 2 warheads and when it make them ready to shot i will be seen on the radar it cost 4times of a eurofigther and in combat rating againts a su 29 it only have 2% more than the eurofigther(95%) so i would say the the eurofigther is the best plane in the world !
@Kully211 your a fuking idiot. the f22 carries 8 ait-to-air missiles. and the eurofighter has been projected ineffective against russian su35s while the f22 has a 38-1 ratio against it. so the eurofighter is trash
@Talshet funny, concidering that those "war games", showed no such thing. they showed f22s going into a conflict with china over taiwan with an estimated 48-0 combat ration against the su35s of the opposing froces, it didnt even address air-to-air combat of the f35 and f18, even though they would mop the floor with that piece of trash su35.
@Talshet You forgot to add that that 'war game' was actually not a war game and rather a simulation and was completely unrealistic because it was all Within Visual Range fighting..only one in ten modern air engagements are within Visual Range, completely discrediting the simulation.
@DailyStaley Haha, to much US propaganda or games and movies?The most air to air fights was and are now dogfights.Where do you think you can fight with aircrafts other aircrafts.Fighter was designed to get air supirioty in foreign areas, and now here is the problem.Long range fights can only be possible against 3rd world countries without radars SAM and AA.Each country with radar,SAM,AA will definitly shot down any aircraft or AntiRadar/SAM missiles before you can come close.
@Talshet Oh and no you're dead wrong. It's been shown over and over again that 9 out of 10 Modern air engagements are Beyond Visual Range. This has been proven. And Moscow's missile shield can't stop hundreds of Tomahawks from smashing into their targets. Just not possible. If you really believe that.. well we all know who is under the influence of propaganda. Although some Air defenses will Remain. I'll admit that.
@DailyStaley You are propaganda brainwashed.Do you realy believe USA could come close enough to russia to use even cruise missiles, trust me russian navy is strong dont unterrate russia like you do always with any other country.Your poor paper tiger country lost iraq,afghanistan,vietnam and korea you cant compare with country that fought over 2000 years.USA cant coordinate so much navy ships to engange russia with cruise missile dont dream boy.
@Talshet Lol. Don't make me laugh. The US defense budget is 687 Billion while Russia's is a tiny fraction of that, at 53 billion. And cruise missiles don't matter anymore.. both countries have more than enough missiles to destroy each other. You're just proving you're brainwashed in your comments. And guess what the USA has lost 2,000 men in Afghanistan in 11 years while Russia lost 10,000+ Men in Afghanistan in ten years while the US has only lost 2,000 troops in a longer period of time.. FACT.
@DailyStaley You are forgetting the times where that war was fought. In 70s and 80s there was no such thing as pilotless planes or shit like that, you fuck... people had to go and do the job- some people died because human technology wasnt at the current level. 21st century -yankee cunts went to afghanistan and regardless of their UFO like shits with wings, they still lost 2000 men. Fucken hamburger eaters. lol. pathetic country, pathetic culture, pathetic history.
@Dony23921 We steamrolled the 4th largest Army in the world in a week..Gulf war 1 babbby. And of course we are going to lose a substantial amount of men when we're fighting insurgent hit-and-run pussies..although I disagree with the Iraq war in the first place. There is no reason for us to be there.. at all. But that doesn't mean we're losing, not at all.
@DailyStaley hahaha that fourth largest army was equipped with 80s machinery and weaponary. Very little modern stuff. Take on China, North Korea or Russia. We'll see then. In war there are no "pussies". You do whatever for victory. Remember this. NATO taking on ONE little country- of course you'd win, but that makes YOU the pussies here.
@Dony23921 nah i wont put North Korea in here since they are just bs terrorists. I cant believe Russia or China are helping them......Without Russia or China North Korea is nothing
@DailyStaley It pisses me off so bad, when capitalist shitheads go on about Soviet campaign in afghanistan, trying to compare Soviet Army of 80s with hamburgerland of the 2000s... comparing human work with machine work. Idiots. Try to sit in afghanistan for 10 years with none of your modern shit and only be equipped, armed and dressed in 80s gear. Then we will talk. Country built on blood of its indiginous people...
@DailyStaley You do realize the Russian troops which fought in Afghanistan were not Russian right? They were trained by Russians but they were not all Russian troops. Plus last time I checked Russian Armed Forces are still a threat to the US Armed Forces....FACT...btw how did the Vietnam war go :) .....remember Vietnam ended bad for US cause Russians were supplying them.Same as for the Afghans.US gave them weapons to counter the Russians.Now no one is aiding them and US has easy picking.
@DailyStaley also America did not have Russia helping Talibans like SAD helped them against Russians ;-).... It is interesting how can CNN affect low IQ...
@DailyStaley We have smaller budget because we aren't the world agressor. We don't need a huge army, because we don't attack anyone. The mean boy always has bigger fists
@DailyStaley that dont mean anything, and china has done so much more with less, you forget about political will,and corruption as factors, china is commie and steals or is buying our ip on the cheap ,plus its commie they have heap labor and no political obstacles, they get shit done, not go through a shit ton bureaucratic crap,sm with their infrastructure ,and technology has changes a bit since the russian afghan invasion and now,and do has the country,russia softened it up quite a bit
@DailyStaley you cant go by dollar amounts, and there are so many US black projects and money spent we dont even know about, , and i bet other countries have them too, if 9-11 was not a mossad cia flase flag i could also point out that they couldnt stop 2 slow moving commercial air liners, do you have to factor in ALL variables, not just $ ,the germans were able to move the v2 from penumunda to nordhausen underground,,and the alies couldnt find it,germany is small,china is huge they could have
@bulletproof2353 I happen to live 30 miles away from the Lima Tank Plant in the US.. it would be VERY hard to have massive underground factories without them being discovered..
@DailyStaley Well if it wasn't for the CIA undercover supply operation of FIM-92 Stinger missiles to Mujahedins as part of Operation Cyclone the Russian helicopter tactics would have eliminated all resistance. Check Wikipedia. Another fact
@DailyStaley uhhh u r not comparing the number of mujaheddins, they numbered 9:1 compared to now, they were armed with stingers and so many guns(many new), funded by the cia, given logistics data by the americans,... and now they r nothing but a bunch of ill trained fighters who seem to get a kill just because of their determination not their training, their guns are all 20 years or 3 gen. younger in tech than the americans, they dont the effective stingers.plus 3/7of the russ,dead duetosickness
@mrvishal1000 We've already taken complete control of Afghanistan and Iraq, while the Soviets failed to take over Afghanistan. We won.. Russia lost. Simple. As. That.
@DailyStaley Lol no one lost and no one won, if anything Russia and America both lost because they both retreated and caused both of them serious debt. I`m not saying Iraq or Afghanistan won either. And considering that America has already done this in Vietnam it make us look stupid as Americans. History repeats itself my friend.
@DailyStaley America and Russia have different military doctrines. USA navy is superior to any but it is also most expensive to maintain and to replace in case of lose in battle. On the other hand Russians have superior mechanized infantry cose they dont need any strategic ressurces. I dont know what is point of ur arguin, but if we imagine war between SAD and Russia, it would last 1 day or Russians would won cose they dont need what American's needs. Lets hope that will not happen
@DailyStaley We operate aircraft carrying cruisers, dude.... Those don't need shit loads of escorting ships and submarines... they aren't swimming airfields, like yours. They can go in the sea alone and kick ass on their own. Let your most modern aircraft carrier in the sea alone, and lets see how it will defeat the enemy alone. Our ones do that.
@DailyStaley ...couse Russian F. have it intrest ner it...unlike usa who need to have Aircraft carrier to invade others country for oil making up story about mass destruction weapons mean while they steal oil from them.
@DailyStaley There is no scenario in Real where you can fight air to air only with fighters without any SAM,AA,Radars or AWACS for ECM fights.This long range air to air fights are not possible this is just a concept that will never like that.Most Fights are SAM.AA against Fighters and second is dogfight.Fighters cant come close enough without be engaged of SAM.Modern systemes like Panzir Tunguska can destroy any Air to air or Air to ground missile before it reaches targets.
@Talshet Sure there is. Once the wild weasel strikes begin and the tomahawks destroy your air defense systems it will be Plane vs Plane. See what i'm saying.. That's why the US focuses on such a powerful navy.. so we can line our Battle groups up and destroy the defense systems of a country before we take control of its airspace. Works extremely well. And no missile interceptor platform performs 100%.. at best 80%. Moscow's Missile shield would be destroyed.
@DailyStaley You have no idea what you talking.Even old russian AA systemes are capable to destroy cruise missiles thats their jobs.Cruisemissiles have no chance to destroy radars SAMs or AAs. reaction time of russian AA.SAMs are best.Before cruisemissile reach target it would be taken out from Tunguska,S125,S300,S400,PanzirC1 and other systemes.Main battle target for AA systemes is to protect ground forces and destroy balistic missiles like cruise missiles.
@catlitta Do a little research of your own. Multiple good sources confirm 10,000+ Russian KIA.. do a google search. Russia's strong sure, but it's not really an empire anymore.. and certainly can't match the US war machine.
@catlitta The Russian MiG 1.44 program was compromised by Chinese hackers and so was the US F-35.. which had part of the F-22 design. The Chinese cant come up with an original design and we all know that. They cant even make their own Jet Engines.
WTF??!!! J-10 and J-11B is included while the more advanced Su-27, MiG-29 and MiG-30 is not included?!? he also missed to mention the Su-47 and MiG 1.44 since he has not mentioned that it should be in active service.
carlobisquera 12 hours ago
wot the fuck j-11b better than eurofighter EF is defo 2nd best in the world it could even be one because it beat the f-22 in a dogfight and the f-22 never beat the EF
wiganerrmc 15 hours ago
Stupppid China, they are copycats....lilliput bastards.. don't worry neighbouring countries... whatever it.. It's CHINA MADE... so dont worry.....
MrBadribalboa 17 hours ago
Je sais que cette vidéo date de 2009 mais il n'y a même pas le Rafale... Encore du french bashing, mais à la sauce chinoise cette fois ci! N'importe quoi! :(
dgdl59danse 1 day ago
j-11 better than an f-15k, strike eagle or silent eagle????? right, its just a copy of an su27. a mig 35 would destroy an su 27 in a sec india same thing expor su 30 mkII is export version of su-27... i could buy an SU-27 for 5 million US each cmon.... su-35 is nice though
epyon02 2 days ago
Hahahaha F 15 better than MiG 35 lol
srdjan96ful 2 days ago
Nice video - only thing is Chinas planes are Cheap Copies of Isreali and russian planes Can't even be consider Chinese - But they do make Great remotes -
6308281 2 days ago
you have forget the Rafale and it's maybe the more important
charloubidou69 4 days ago
china just copies everyone elses military.. so sad
CaliBear909 4 days ago
@CaliBear909 not only military , they copy everything else
swfearth 3 days ago
@swfearth And unfortunately, we buy it! Stop buying Chinese!
Shortstory123 16 hours ago
i do not agree with all of you guys why do you like only one aircraft and u only want that to be the best and you say that others suck its so wrong you should be for all aircraft i like the f 22 but i don't think only the f 22 can defeat our enemies its so wrong how you think like the f 22 is a dog fighter but what about strike aircraft,mluti role, electronic warfare what about them thats why we need all of our planes it doesn't matter is it srong or not its about the skills of the pilot
helihopter1 4 days ago
F22 the best ahahah, fucking kids.
MrIncantation 5 days ago 2
@MrIncantation russian stuff is great if you're a 10 year street kid in Africa or a tin pot dictator of a third world country
HerculesRockefellerr 4 days ago
@HerculesRockefellerr mistake: old russian stuff. the new ones are actually quite good, the problem is though, we have no money to buy them in sufficient numbers. It would be quite naive to think that those dictators, etc. receive the newest weapons and ammunition.
MrHellexe 3 days ago
@HerculesRockefellerr or a rich american that needs a toy to show off...heck we have 2 su-27s that just sold for civilian use 5 mill US each
epyon02 2 days ago
F-16 is better than F-18 Super-Hornet ???
Applebesserwisser 5 days ago 7
@Applebesserwisser f-16 can manover better and is not as good a fighter as a hole but it could fly circles around a F-15
MrKawasaki1996 2 days ago
@Applebesserwisser No super hornet is better then f-16.
F-18 super hornet has a lower RCS and has AESA radar witch f-16 lacks.
nick74178ify 1 day ago
China makes the best tv remotes in the world.
Alston427 6 days ago 11
Chines J-10 = copy of Israel's Lavi
Chines J-11b = copy of Russian Su 27 French Rafale is not in list ,
sukhoi su 30 mki and MKM are different role players, and they should be at 5/6 rank anyway nice music at start & worst when he started singing.
Oogwaylaugh 6 days ago
Chinese fighter planes!? I didn`t know then, it seems like home versions of eurofighter and su-35. Good for Chine, while they have their own planes , here in Brazil we are trying to buy only 36 fighters since 1998, Brazilian air force wants the f-18 and the congress (i don`t know why) pressures for then accept french war thrash while our fleet gets older and older...
salvadorferreiraneto 1 week ago
@salvadorferreiraneto
If the Rafale is a trash, India wouldn't choose it for THE BIGGEST CONTRACT OF THE HISTORY of Aeronautic. India is on the way to buy 126 Planes, 126 Dassault Rafale for 10 billion dollars.
You President, Dilma Rousseff said that Bresil would probably choose the Rafale too.
The Dassault Rafale is better than,
F-14, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-35, SAAB Gripen, Eurofighter Typhoon, SU-30 and above, Mig-35 and above.
Have a nice day.
samados969 1 week ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
#1 Sukhoi T-50
#2 ?
#3 Sukhoi Su-35 and Dassault Rafale
#5 Eurofighter Typhoon
#6 F-18
#7 Dassault Mirage 2000
#8 F-15
#9 Jas-39 Gripen
#10 F-16
I have to put the Mig inside an another time.
samados969 1 week ago
Comment removed
samados969 1 week ago
Comment removed
samados969 1 week ago
los aviones chinos malisimos, copias!!!!!!!!
danielmontero1000 1 week ago
Best advice when you go up against a Raptor... Turn around and fly home.
Nice list, altough i dont understand why you didnt include the SU-27 Flanker? its a better aircraft then the F-18 ?
Qpollo 1 week ago
not one of these is a practical aircraft carrier model...the only planes that will see true combat
carsonmcneely777 1 week ago
@carsonmcneely777 wtf is wrong with you
SirHungryHippo 1 week ago
Quite a lot of these planes looked slow as hell carrying all that ordinance.
sergeantassassin2 1 week ago
Try to serch in youtube Discovery - F22 vs SU-37
TopecsArtur 1 week ago
The best is the PAK FA
reycuyo 1 week ago
@reycuyo Su 35BM is better. PAK FA second.
adrianwillis360 1 week ago
optronics and spectra allow to bridge the difference in scope between the radar f2 and rafale the question is who will see another first, this one will win.
ctulluh50 1 week ago
Remember that the F22 stealth loses when it opens its vaults. and in close combat everything happens very very quickly here rafale becomes the best---- BOOM
ctulluh50 1 week ago
@ctulluh50 the missile bay doors are open for less than 1 second upon firing a missile. no radar on earth can detect, track, lock, and fire on an aircraft in less than 1 second(that is assuming the pilot has machine like reflexes).
hotpocketpoison 1 week ago
@hotpocketpoison okay ! it's true.
ctulluh50 1 week ago
capable of tracking 40 targets on land and at the same time to engage aerial targets 8 and 8 land
ctulluh50 1 week ago
a plane that is semi-stealth without spectra and fully with it , an aircraft that is combat proven, that system has a best perform data fusion and of course the best of all other optronics.
ctulluh50 1 week ago
this is very strange indeed not to mention therafalet just eliminate the F18 and EF in a "very extensive competition comporatnt over 600 evaluation points,
ctulluh50 1 week ago
A very curious listing; I'm always interested in other people are thinking ... That said, you ignore (or are unaware of) one small but critical fact; namely, export versions of American aircraft are NOT the same models flown by U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy pilots ...
semichdom 1 week ago
@semichdom i heard that their export versions are inferior to ones they actually use in USAF
MrKasperabhay 1 week ago
you forget the "RAFALE" from Dassault
esprit83990 1 week ago
number of dislikes is more you may remove this video with chine music & chinese aircraft too. You never be a indian.fake indian channel.
serversss1 1 week ago
...mancano un po' di jet....
MrChanakkale 2 weeks ago
J11B??? 這是SU27
jiji6099 2 weeks ago
j 11B = flanker B+ ; and where are rafale and grippen ??
MrKasperabhay 2 weeks ago
Su 30, 35 are same ...they are just modified according to the requirements of the countries..like Su 30 mki for india and mkk for china ..the mki ver being upgraded to current su 35 standards..
MrKasperabhay 2 weeks ago
F 22 -- never saw an air war , onboard life support system found to be problematic , officially stopped from being produced , Flight hours being reduced to 1/3 , cost of maintenance and manf. very high , In 2012 it will only perform in air shows and tech demonstrator and yet no. 1 ..good ..:D
MrKasperabhay 2 weeks ago
@MrKasperabhay SU-30 and 35 have also never seen a real air to air battle and have a problem with crashing into the crowd at airshows
HerculesRockefellerr 1 week ago
@HerculesRockefellerr you are absolutely correct ..neither of them saw an air war because they never got a chance to combat in any war, on the other hand USAF could have used F22 in Iraq, Afghanistan or in Libya (just for demo of fire power if not for Air sup) + Sukhois are still in production ..and Su 27 crashed into a crowd O_O not 30 or 35 ..
MrKasperabhay 1 week ago
@HerculesRockefellerr you may think that i am making up stories about F 22 but this is reality . Read it , its all over the net ...F 22 was a better fighter ...not now ..esp when countries are coming up with something new and better u_u
MrKasperabhay 1 week ago
@MrKasperabhay Russia always talks up its fighters but when the real shooting starts they are always the ones on the ground in flames on CNN...FACT...you know its true!
Oh so it was only the SU-27 that crashes into crowds at air shows...thanks for clearing that up...LOL. Speaking of maintence russia has a hard time even keeping spare parts for its fighters in stock.
HerculesRockefellerr 1 week ago
@HerculesRockefellerr no ..i don't think so ..Russian fighters in control of skilled pilots can be lethal ..we all know how American super advanced jets were massacred in Vietnam ...and i am talking about Vietnamese flying those Russian(soviet) planes ..no wonder why there are so many Aces in their Air force ...spare parts ..not a problem ..you'll get as many if you have money ...-__- its not like spare parts are not available for Russian jets at all..
MrKasperabhay 1 week ago
@MrKasperabhay I wasnt even born the last time a Russian made plane shot down an American made one...and thats no shit
HerculesRockefellerr 1 week ago
@HerculesRockefellerr doesn't matter if you were born or not ...IT'S ON RECORD u__u
MrKasperabhay 1 week ago
@HerculesRockefellerr + i see only Americans and Eu bragging about their tech ...on youtube ...
MrKasperabhay 1 week ago
f-22 is the best of the best for this generation it literally defies gravity can do tighter turns than an f-16 with less g-force cuz of its shape im also in afrotc training specializing in f-22's
zombiekillr2122 2 weeks ago
SU 50 is the best aircraft
MrMent8 2 weeks ago
@MrMent8 f22/35 would eat the su50 alive
ps3bandit8 1 week ago
F15 is outdated. Very bad choice for Korea.
CPYV78 2 weeks ago
I'm sorry, but the F22 may be the most technologically advanced, but cost effectiveness should be considered, 1 F22 costs twice as much as 1 EuroFighter Typhoon, this dogfight would obviously never happen as the US and UK are mad tight, but only 1 Typhoon would need to lock onto the F22 in order for both Typhoons to fire at it, there's a reason F22 production has been stopped in favour of the F35, it's inefficient and unnecessary.
MNightTomalan 2 weeks ago
Rafale was choosen by India as the best fighter among the list you just show us 3 years ago.
" Not good enough " is not the qualifier I'd use
Sartoli 3 weeks ago
Hahaha pathetic list!
Didnt Gripen kick f-16,F-18 asses? And J-10 what a joke
michekk 3 weeks ago
Lol where is F-35 ???
#1 F-35
1905dogu 3 weeks ago
the fastest fighter/interceptor is mig 25 and mig 31** not the f-15
mrvishal1000 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley Uhm, well they do operate the Admiral Kuznetsov, which carry Su-33s and Kamovs. They plan to replace the Su-33s with 29 MiG-29Ks after a refit this year.
lb8068 3 weeks ago
This is really stupid. Everyone knows that the Su-35 is superior to the F-22. The Su-35 is the best in maneuver but the Raptor even can't engage in aerial combat. Russia is powerfull in air, and the USA on ground. They can destroy each other whenever they want with those nukes.
FrontlineSniper01 3 weeks ago
rafal.....!!!??????
pateurick 3 weeks ago
the Japanese chose the f-35 over the euro fighter the south Koreans chose the f-35 over the t50 non us countries then implie that our aircraft are the best
monsterjamusaf 3 weeks ago
the f-22 is the best no question about it . the j-20s and t50s use 30 year old tech because most of it came off of a crashed f117 which are already replaced here in america
monsterjamusaf 3 weeks ago
et le rafale ??????????????
tonymultani 3 weeks ago
@tonymultani The rafale is only placed on 5.... but i have numberous exemples and reports of training with this aircraft, with good results
MrSUMMERTIME37 3 weeks ago
@MrSUMMERTIME37 but that dude dint put rafale in hes top 10 like wtffffffffffff
tonymultani 3 weeks ago
@tonymultani But links doesn't works... bad for youtube... I can only say sorry for US sophisticated aircraft : some exemples 2009 - Air Tactical Leadership Course (ATLC) : Rafale versus Typhoon (eurofighter) : 4-0 and 3-1
Rafale versus F22 : 6 matches.... F22 win only one
Nevest report... from an US newpaper (DEW line) : Rafale beats F-35 & F-22 in Flight International (another victory)
MrSUMMERTIME37 3 weeks ago
And many other reports, search on google, easy to find.
But F35 and F22 are not really bad aircraft, they are too new to be completly efficient, and matches are very close against rafale... and perhaps french pilots have more experience and ... "french touch"... with time i thinks US aircraft will dominate ATLC.
For information, Rafale is the last Fighter Aircraft for Dassault and for France : Futur is Dassault nEUROn : a Fighting advanced UCAV
MrSUMMERTIME37 3 weeks ago
India is good at reproduction, u make planes we will make babies...
nirbhay121 3 weeks ago
Well, nothing about how much the maintains cost are. Nothing about if the plane can use each others radar. And nothing about how well trained the pilotes are.
Look at JAS 39 Gripen, and in just a few years JAS next generation.
Filmfanatiken 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
f15 is full of technical problems many jets are better than f22 when it comes to actual fights this rating is shit
tejasfansamkar111 3 weeks ago
Even though its japanese, song?
ImGalactic 1 month ago
I appreciate that you're a loyalist of F-22 Raptor but the point here is... The advantage of 22's is only by technology. While F-15 has it's great capability in modern combat in almost 3 decades. I guest Raptor must be in the second place. And as of now F-35 Lightning II have everything that every aircraft have.
TheGeneralBruiser 1 month ago
J-20 vs PAK FA vs F-22??????
07johngabz 1 month ago
The best Russian and American planes they occupy the entire desyaiku leaders ...
maksim21011986 1 month ago
J-10 vs J-11 vs Gripen vs F-18 vs F-15 vs SU-27 vs F-22... who will win?
07johngabz 1 month ago
@07johngabz F22 because the F22 would be invisible on the Radar
Thili6854 1 month ago
@07johngabz Who will win? For me it's F-35 Lightning II! ^_^
TheGeneralBruiser 1 month ago
@TheGeneralBruiser F-35 SUCKS!!! F-22 wins! Or the F/A-18F...
connerm191 4 weeks ago
Alright, I just saw the rankings and i'm still laughing. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that whoever created this list is from China? Lol!! Even though I know lists like these are subjective and everyone in the world hates the U.S., but comon! I think it's funny how certain fighters are claimed as made in China, but their Russian made fighters. I also love how the best fighter, the F-22, got a disavantage caption.If your going to be consistant, give every fighter a diavantage caption.
briankerbs 1 month ago
tu dell'aviazione non capisci proprio un cazzo F/A 18 per ultio il mig mi vieni a mettere ma va a giocare a mosca ceca sulle rotaie ingnorante
ZioBorisitalia 1 month ago
OMG! What a joke!!
mmaq34 1 month ago
Su 35 1!
Max57rus1 1 month ago
and su-37???
erpelle91 1 month ago
J11B = SU-27
xalekcey 1 month ago
why can't i ever find a top ten list of old planes like World war 2 and stuff. :P
USSWISCONSIN64 1 month ago
f15 slam eagle? its strike eagle you fucking twat
mrbyron969 1 month ago
@mrbyron969 Lol slam eagle is the Korean version.. its a bit better than the strike eagle
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@mrbyron969
Watch your mouth big apple!
NYWXZ 1 month ago
@mrbyron969: The F-15K Slam Eagle is a modified F-15 Eagle. The South Korean could choose between SU-35, Eurofighter Typhoon, Rafale & F-15K. And they have chosen the F-15K.
SuperGeronimo999 1 month ago
@SuperGeronimo999 South Korea is an US satellite what did you expect?
gvoz3 1 month ago
most of the planes in the top 4 places except for the f22 are on the bottom of all the other lists, and are there disadvantages on the f22 and not on the other planes?
mrbyron969 1 month ago
china has own aircrafts! what an age....
Misha607552 1 month ago
@Misha607552 Yea, ripped off tech..
bdenniso 1 month ago
WTF !! No Rafale, Eurofighter and Gripen just this chinese rubber111
TheHomeless080 1 month ago
The French Rafale must be in the 3 first places!
Gallac1 1 month ago
Rafale ? not enough good ? What did you smoke guy ? It's the better fighter in the world ! He's widely superior to all theses fucking planes in your ranking except perhaps to the f22 raptor but equals ! Pffff....
joelprianonelma 1 month ago
So much Logistics for Air Superiority. Just had those Ground to Air Missiles Fitted with I-Phone Space Invaders Game to do the Empty Pursuit!
benny8hill 1 month ago
fail video the f22 is a shit of a plane it only can carry 2 warheads and when it make them ready to shot i will be seen on the radar it cost 4times of a eurofigther and in combat rating againts a su 29 it only have 2% more than the eurofigther(95%) so i would say the the eurofigther is the best plane in the world !
Kully211 1 month ago
@Kully211 your a fuking idiot. the f22 carries 8 ait-to-air missiles. and the eurofighter has been projected ineffective against russian su35s while the f22 has a 38-1 ratio against it. so the eurofighter is trash
ps3bandit8 1 month ago
@ps3bandit8 Lol funny war games showed diffrent F35,F18 and F22 was completly defeated by russian Su35.
Talshet 1 month ago
@Talshet funny, concidering that those "war games", showed no such thing. they showed f22s going into a conflict with china over taiwan with an estimated 48-0 combat ration against the su35s of the opposing froces, it didnt even address air-to-air combat of the f35 and f18, even though they would mop the floor with that piece of trash su35.
ps3bandit8 1 month ago
@Talshet You forgot to add that that 'war game' was actually not a war game and rather a simulation and was completely unrealistic because it was all Within Visual Range fighting..only one in ten modern air engagements are within Visual Range, completely discrediting the simulation.
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley Haha, to much US propaganda or games and movies?The most air to air fights was and are now dogfights.Where do you think you can fight with aircrafts other aircrafts.Fighter was designed to get air supirioty in foreign areas, and now here is the problem.Long range fights can only be possible against 3rd world countries without radars SAM and AA.Each country with radar,SAM,AA will definitly shot down any aircraft or AntiRadar/SAM missiles before you can come close.
Talshet 1 month ago
@Talshet Oh and no you're dead wrong. It's been shown over and over again that 9 out of 10 Modern air engagements are Beyond Visual Range. This has been proven. And Moscow's missile shield can't stop hundreds of Tomahawks from smashing into their targets. Just not possible. If you really believe that.. well we all know who is under the influence of propaganda. Although some Air defenses will Remain. I'll admit that.
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley You are propaganda brainwashed.Do you realy believe USA could come close enough to russia to use even cruise missiles, trust me russian navy is strong dont unterrate russia like you do always with any other country.Your poor paper tiger country lost iraq,afghanistan,vietnam and korea you cant compare with country that fought over 2000 years.USA cant coordinate so much navy ships to engange russia with cruise missile dont dream boy.
Talshet 1 month ago
@Talshet Lol. Don't make me laugh. The US defense budget is 687 Billion while Russia's is a tiny fraction of that, at 53 billion. And cruise missiles don't matter anymore.. both countries have more than enough missiles to destroy each other. You're just proving you're brainwashed in your comments. And guess what the USA has lost 2,000 men in Afghanistan in 11 years while Russia lost 10,000+ Men in Afghanistan in ten years while the US has only lost 2,000 troops in a longer period of time.. FACT.
DailyStaley 1 month ago 11
@DailyStaley You are forgetting the times where that war was fought. In 70s and 80s there was no such thing as pilotless planes or shit like that, you fuck... people had to go and do the job- some people died because human technology wasnt at the current level. 21st century -yankee cunts went to afghanistan and regardless of their UFO like shits with wings, they still lost 2000 men. Fucken hamburger eaters. lol. pathetic country, pathetic culture, pathetic history.
Dony23921 4 weeks ago
@Dony23921 We steamrolled the 4th largest Army in the world in a week..Gulf war 1 babbby. And of course we are going to lose a substantial amount of men when we're fighting insurgent hit-and-run pussies..although I disagree with the Iraq war in the first place. There is no reason for us to be there.. at all. But that doesn't mean we're losing, not at all.
DailyStaley 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley hahaha that fourth largest army was equipped with 80s machinery and weaponary. Very little modern stuff. Take on China, North Korea or Russia. We'll see then. In war there are no "pussies". You do whatever for victory. Remember this. NATO taking on ONE little country- of course you'd win, but that makes YOU the pussies here.
Dony23921 3 weeks ago
@Dony23921 nah i wont put North Korea in here since they are just bs terrorists. I cant believe Russia or China are helping them......Without Russia or China North Korea is nothing
ZeroOmega529 3 weeks ago
@ZeroOmega529 They are trying to protect their way of life- just as america did in its time. Not spread it, like america does now.
Dony23921 3 weeks ago
@Dony23921 Just dont like how they act and their way of taking care of problems.
ZeroOmega529 3 weeks ago
@ZeroOmega529 Well, noone is perfect man... let them live like they want to live
Dony23921 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley It pisses me off so bad, when capitalist shitheads go on about Soviet campaign in afghanistan, trying to compare Soviet Army of 80s with hamburgerland of the 2000s... comparing human work with machine work. Idiots. Try to sit in afghanistan for 10 years with none of your modern shit and only be equipped, armed and dressed in 80s gear. Then we will talk. Country built on blood of its indiginous people...
Dony23921 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
kunalchanna 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DailyStaley You do realize the Russian troops which fought in Afghanistan were not Russian right? They were trained by Russians but they were not all Russian troops. Plus last time I checked Russian Armed Forces are still a threat to the US Armed Forces....FACT...btw how did the Vietnam war go :) .....remember Vietnam ended bad for US cause Russians were supplying them.Same as for the Afghans.US gave them weapons to counter the Russians.Now no one is aiding them and US has easy picking.
kunalchanna 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley also America did not have Russia helping Talibans like SAD helped them against Russians ;-).... It is interesting how can CNN affect low IQ...
enfaire666 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley We have smaller budget because we aren't the world agressor. We don't need a huge army, because we don't attack anyone. The mean boy always has bigger fists
Dony23921 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley that dont mean anything, and china has done so much more with less, you forget about political will,and corruption as factors, china is commie and steals or is buying our ip on the cheap ,plus its commie they have heap labor and no political obstacles, they get shit done, not go through a shit ton bureaucratic crap,sm with their infrastructure ,and technology has changes a bit since the russian afghan invasion and now,and do has the country,russia softened it up quite a bit
bulletproof2353 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley you cant go by dollar amounts, and there are so many US black projects and money spent we dont even know about, , and i bet other countries have them too, if 9-11 was not a mossad cia flase flag i could also point out that they couldnt stop 2 slow moving commercial air liners, do you have to factor in ALL variables, not just $ ,the germans were able to move the v2 from penumunda to nordhausen underground,,and the alies couldnt find it,germany is small,china is huge they could have
bulletproof2353 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley massive underground factories and so could russia and the US, we know nothing about,
bulletproof2353 3 weeks ago
@bulletproof2353 I happen to live 30 miles away from the Lima Tank Plant in the US.. it would be VERY hard to have massive underground factories without them being discovered..
DailyStaley 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley Well if it wasn't for the CIA undercover supply operation of FIM-92 Stinger missiles to Mujahedins as part of Operation Cyclone the Russian helicopter tactics would have eliminated all resistance. Check Wikipedia. Another fact
PCGamerLysander 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley uhhh u r not comparing the number of mujaheddins, they numbered 9:1 compared to now, they were armed with stingers and so many guns(many new), funded by the cia, given logistics data by the americans,... and now they r nothing but a bunch of ill trained fighters who seem to get a kill just because of their determination not their training, their guns are all 20 years or 3 gen. younger in tech than the americans, they dont the effective stingers.plus 3/7of the russ,dead duetosickness
mrvishal1000 3 weeks ago
@mrvishal1000 Same thing Russia did to the USA in Vietnam when they funded the NVA!! RUSSIA LOST GET OVER IT!
DailyStaley 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley and the us is going to lose in Afghanistan too, they 're already negotiating with the taliban ......
mrvishal1000 3 weeks ago
@mrvishal1000 We've already taken complete control of Afghanistan and Iraq, while the Soviets failed to take over Afghanistan. We won.. Russia lost. Simple. As. That.
DailyStaley 2 weeks ago
@DailyStaley taliban is coming to share power with the govt. and u call taken over?? hhaha gl
mrvishal1000 2 weeks ago
@DailyStaley Lol no one lost and no one won, if anything Russia and America both lost because they both retreated and caused both of them serious debt. I`m not saying Iraq or Afghanistan won either. And considering that America has already done this in Vietnam it make us look stupid as Americans. History repeats itself my friend.
AwesomePossum1997 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
sharpiellll 2 weeks ago
@DailyStaley Russian defense budget is 600 billion, and Afghans actually had weapons to defend themselves during Soviet occupation.
sharpiellll 2 weeks ago
@sharpiellll And they did when they were fighting American`s it`s not like AK-47`s and RPG`s flew out of the sky
.
AwesomePossum1997 2 weeks ago
@AwesomePossum1997 I'm talking about Stingers.
sharpiellll 2 weeks ago
@Talshet And the US has 11 Modern Super-Carrier Battle Groups. How many Carriers does Russia operate...NONE.
DailyStaley 1 month ago 8
@DailyStaley America and Russia have different military doctrines. USA navy is superior to any but it is also most expensive to maintain and to replace in case of lose in battle. On the other hand Russians have superior mechanized infantry cose they dont need any strategic ressurces. I dont know what is point of ur arguin, but if we imagine war between SAD and Russia, it would last 1 day or Russians would won cose they dont need what American's needs. Lets hope that will not happen
enfaire666 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley We operate aircraft carrying cruisers, dude.... Those don't need shit loads of escorting ships and submarines... they aren't swimming airfields, like yours. They can go in the sea alone and kick ass on their own. Let your most modern aircraft carrier in the sea alone, and lets see how it will defeat the enemy alone. Our ones do that.
Dony23921 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley one
Gideon5600 3 weeks ago
@Gideon5600 Decommissioned meaning they don't use it anymore. They sold it to China.
DailyStaley 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley Wack um and stack um, DailyStaley!
ironhardt 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley Admiral Kuznetsov, you brainwashed American
firESPIke1000 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley ...couse Russian F. have it intrest ner it...unlike usa who need to have Aircraft carrier to invade others country for oil making up story about mass destruction weapons mean while they steal oil from them.
mauricioalfredo83 3 weeks ago
@DailyStaley There is no scenario in Real where you can fight air to air only with fighters without any SAM,AA,Radars or AWACS for ECM fights.This long range air to air fights are not possible this is just a concept that will never like that.Most Fights are SAM.AA against Fighters and second is dogfight.Fighters cant come close enough without be engaged of SAM.Modern systemes like Panzir Tunguska can destroy any Air to air or Air to ground missile before it reaches targets.
Talshet 1 month ago
@Talshet Sure there is. Once the wild weasel strikes begin and the tomahawks destroy your air defense systems it will be Plane vs Plane. See what i'm saying.. That's why the US focuses on such a powerful navy.. so we can line our Battle groups up and destroy the defense systems of a country before we take control of its airspace. Works extremely well. And no missile interceptor platform performs 100%.. at best 80%. Moscow's Missile shield would be destroyed.
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley You have no idea what you talking.Even old russian AA systemes are capable to destroy cruise missiles thats their jobs.Cruisemissiles have no chance to destroy radars SAMs or AAs. reaction time of russian AA.SAMs are best.Before cruisemissile reach target it would be taken out from Tunguska,S125,S300,S400,PanzirC1 and other systemes.Main battle target for AA systemes is to protect ground forces and destroy balistic missiles like cruise missiles.
Talshet 1 month ago
chinese music, press mute
brightahmad 1 month ago
number 1 is Alien Space craft. when it comes to us, you are all get screwed HAHAH....
moistfaucet 1 month ago
in Norway they Us F-16 So when i i live in Northern Norway that was often i saw F-16 Flying Over Us
MrHeiaheia 1 month ago
The Rafale is a best plane of world
MrAdriAdri007 1 month ago
@MrAdriAdri007 look an wikipedia eurofigther is the best it have the best combat rating against the su 29 !
Kully211 1 month ago
i guess the maker of this video is chinese hahaha
Petlovedurian 1 month ago
су 35 и су 37 это разные самолёты ;) а F-22 проигрывает су 37 по боевым характеристикам даже на дискавери это подтвердили;)
007ADaniel 1 month ago
Lol, chineese clone of SU-27 is the 4th best plane, while SU-27 is not even on the list ?
SuperSabakevich 1 month ago 8
@SuperSabakevich ... couple that with chinese music.. and well you get the idea :)/
Misha607552 1 month ago
@SuperSabakevich China pisses me off too.. they got the J20 design from Russia's MiG 1.44 and the US F-35 and F-22. Thieves -_-
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley and the evidene is where?
catlitta 1 month ago
@catlitta Do a little research of your own. Multiple good sources confirm 10,000+ Russian KIA.. do a google search. Russia's strong sure, but it's not really an empire anymore.. and certainly can't match the US war machine.
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley I didn't ask for that. You said the J-20's design is stolen. Where is the evidence??
catlitta 1 month ago
@catlitta The Russian MiG 1.44 program was compromised by Chinese hackers and so was the US F-35.. which had part of the F-22 design. The Chinese cant come up with an original design and we all know that. They cant even make their own Jet Engines.
DailyStaley 1 month ago
@DailyStaley So you work for Lockheed-Martin, Mikoyan-Gurevich or Chengdu Aircraft Corperation? Very impressive.
yes, believe the lies of your government! ridicolous
catlitta 1 month ago