Well the "softer" suspension is in the springs itself. I used to drive a 02 WRX and 06 impreza and I can honestly say that they were a harsh drive. Don't get me wrong, they are good in a even road, but hit the smallest pothole and it seems like the dash is gonna dismantle... That is what they mean by "softer" drive. Nothing a set of kingsprings can't fix. And if anyone out there asking why they should put that then they probably don't really need it since they won't be hitting the tracks... :)
Fair enough there. But that is purely because you prefer aesthetics (not that there anything wrong with that) but performance keen people would differ and pick a wooden wagon that goes fast instead of a nice looking car that disappoints.
I hear you, but everything I've read about the new Sti says that it's not a fun car to drive. The suspension is softer than the 07 and it has tons of understeer. Pretty much all the auto press say the Evo is much more exciting car in every way. The Sti has been dulled.
@haze1123 I wouldnt buy a subie... they go are expensive and all they do is turn up the boost fuck tat. Id get a nice looking cheaper naturally aspirated car then boost it if I want to go faster
@jakubgt1 What? It's lame and immature to rant on someone's grammar. Those Subaru's are known for their headgasket problems. I mean the Drivetrain, tranny, and AYC are awesome but the boxter engine itself sucks... Rather get a AWD 4g63.
Go Team PERRIN!!
PERRINPerformance 1 year ago
Well the "softer" suspension is in the springs itself. I used to drive a 02 WRX and 06 impreza and I can honestly say that they were a harsh drive. Don't get me wrong, they are good in a even road, but hit the smallest pothole and it seems like the dash is gonna dismantle... That is what they mean by "softer" drive. Nothing a set of kingsprings can't fix. And if anyone out there asking why they should put that then they probably don't really need it since they won't be hitting the tracks... :)
scoobeydoooo 3 years ago
wah bov is that?
khmaiN1ggah 4 years ago
I love the one vividracing did..this looks like a Civic hatch.
MARKMARKDUDE 4 years ago
Thats what your gf said too!!! ....wait you dont have a gf must of been the hooker you paid for ;)
jerridlv 4 years ago
Man, it looks fat and ugly even when its in motion. What a joke.
haze1123 4 years ago
Yes it does until it rapes your car without reving as hard as the previous generation rexies. Then it will look slim and beautiful.
scoobeydoooo 3 years ago 2
Ugly is ugly.
For $40K, I'd rather go a little bit slower and drive something that looks good. =)
haze1123 3 years ago
Fair enough there. But that is purely because you prefer aesthetics (not that there anything wrong with that) but performance keen people would differ and pick a wooden wagon that goes fast instead of a nice looking car that disappoints.
scoobeydoooo 3 years ago
I hear you, but everything I've read about the new Sti says that it's not a fun car to drive. The suspension is softer than the 07 and it has tons of understeer. Pretty much all the auto press say the Evo is much more exciting car in every way. The Sti has been dulled.
haze1123 3 years ago
@haze1123 I wouldnt buy a subie... they go are expensive and all they do is turn up the boost fuck tat. Id get a nice looking cheaper naturally aspirated car then boost it if I want to go faster
hernandadmx 9 months ago
@hernandadmx
I think you should worry about your spelling/grammer a bit more before posting such ignorant comments.
jakubgt1 7 months ago
@jakubgt1 What? It's lame and immature to rant on someone's grammar. Those Subaru's are known for their headgasket problems. I mean the Drivetrain, tranny, and AYC are awesome but the boxter engine itself sucks... Rather get a AWD 4g63.
hernandadmx 7 months ago