NO one claims the universe came from NOTHING. The claim is the universe came from something.
The concept was first proposed by Father Le Maitre (theology and mathematics). Primordial Atom. Even ignoring the big bang theory is not part of the theory of evolution, it was first proposed by someone who believed in God. I don't know Le Maitre's opinion on "evolution" since he wasn't a biologist. God and Mathematics, sure, but I doubt he even addressed biology.
Further, if you look at the greats in science and mathematics, you'll find that many if not most accepted the concept of God. If talking Newton and Kepler, they were VERY religious/spiritual people. Kepler is one example of a person who felt there was no higher calling than studying God's work.
"the geometrical natures of things have provided the Creator the model for decorating the whole world" (Kepler 1611)
Newton taught theology and mathematics, but personally was not orthodox, and was very anti-Catholic. His life goal was to find God, though his work, with mathematics.
"I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I appear to have been but a little boy, playing on the sea-shore, and diverting myself, in now and then finding a smooth pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me" (Newton 1855)
Science does not seek to disprove, or disprove God. Science seeks to explain the natural world, and that's it. Science is not anti-God. This lies at the heart of dishonesty of Kent Hovind.
something cannot always exist, it must have an origin. god cannot exist without a cause, otherwise you could just simply say that the universe always existed. you fail so badly
NO one claims the universe came from NOTHING. The claim is the universe came from something.
The concept was first proposed by Father Le Maitre (theology and mathematics). Primordial Atom. Even ignoring the big bang theory is not part of the theory of evolution, it was first proposed by someone who believed in God. I don't know Le Maitre's opinion on "evolution" since he wasn't a biologist. God and Mathematics, sure, but I doubt he even addressed biology.
IGExpandingPanda 2 years ago
Further, if you look at the greats in science and mathematics, you'll find that many if not most accepted the concept of God. If talking Newton and Kepler, they were VERY religious/spiritual people. Kepler is one example of a person who felt there was no higher calling than studying God's work.
"the geometrical natures of things have provided the Creator the model for decorating the whole world" (Kepler 1611)
IGExpandingPanda 2 years ago
Newton taught theology and mathematics, but personally was not orthodox, and was very anti-Catholic. His life goal was to find God, though his work, with mathematics.
"I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I appear to have been but a little boy, playing on the sea-shore, and diverting myself, in now and then finding a smooth pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me" (Newton 1855)
IGExpandingPanda 2 years ago
Science does not seek to disprove, or disprove God. Science seeks to explain the natural world, and that's it. Science is not anti-God. This lies at the heart of dishonesty of Kent Hovind.
IGExpandingPanda 2 years ago
poor boy. believing Kent Hovind, believing Science is evil.
I Tell you what. Over here in Germany we would love the Idea you learn Kreationism at school - we'd love to get your jobs ;-)
so please do go on!
AnnOnuem75 2 years ago
something cannot always exist, it must have an origin. god cannot exist without a cause, otherwise you could just simply say that the universe always existed. you fail so badly
dalektaliban 2 years ago
Epic fail.
joebevins1999 2 years ago