it does but the whole black and gray make it warfare type and the post processing makes it like that. when u turn pp down to low it looks like the wall has rainbows on it
Phaaaa! Watch videos where showen differences between X9.0c and X10 and some of them say that there are almost no differences and other say that X9.0c is better!
Put this on XP and get the XP patch for it and it will be much smoother. Vista makes games alot slower. (All games only working on vista can be made to work on XP with a patch. Takes a bit longer to get working but has better gameplay.)
Vista plays games alot slower because of all the useles junk/processes running in the background. But if you disable them all, you will be able to run the games just as fast as in the XP version.
well first of all XP cant even run DX 10 and second DONT USE DX 10 IN THIS GAME UNLESS YOU WANT THE 4XAA. its just the same detail lvl as DX9 is and dont try using ntune's override for game applications to enhance the AA quality or AF. it doesnt work...
how much frame rates do u get because im getting a system very similar to urs but i probably wont use Vista because its harder for me to use because im used to XP, my mom has vista and its very complicated for me.
they are getting closer to extreme hyper-realism, crysis and call of duty 4 are great examples of this, the next step up would be a virtual game with the same graphics as crysis or CoD 4, then they will be realistic and beautiful, but games will always keep looking better.
Exactly. Unlike Manhunter13's half-assed response, you dont just need a Video Card with 4.0 "shayders"...or SHADERS as its actually spelt, but you also need Vista, XP doesnt support DX10 (any DX10-ready card will still work in XP (8800 cards, etc) but they will only run on DX9)
ok. thanks. but just to clarify, since i dont have vista i cant run gears in directx 10, but microsoft could have made a patch, like the one made for company of heroes? so they could have made it possible, but didnt.
Windows XP and DX10 arnt capatible, it has to do with XPs coding, they would need to re-write like half the OS to make DX10 fully work in it, and that would be useless. So no, technically they cant make a "DX10 patch" for XP. Vista only. Not only that, DX10 is Vistas selling point, they wont get rid of that.
Yes they can, microsoft made both systems, but there money hogging bastards and will never do so, because they want people to pay hundreds of pounds or dollars for vista.
"In the House - In a Heartbeat" is an instrumental track by British composer John Murphy. It is most famous for its association with the 2002 film 28 Days Later!
You idiot. FRAPS slows down your frame rate to whatever it's recording at. He may get 500 fps in a game, but if he kicks on FRAPS it will slow it down to 30 to record.
well considering i also use frapps and i can get 60 then he must have the settings wrong check my F.E.A.R video if u dont believe me but ah well cant plz every1
i htink people make the mistake of forgetting to record the video in youtube resolution which is smaller and easier to record without lagging the computer if its shit
Actually no - the human eye usually wont notice anything more than about 60fps... believe me - if you had a game at 30fps and 60fps - I could tell the difference easily.
You can't compare television and video games directly in fps,(rendered differently and displayed differently.) There have been tests that show air force pilots could distinguish a plane silhouette shown only for 1/220th of a second, but the human eye doesn't see in FPS to begin with, it sees in constant fluid motion; so labeling human vision in FPS is absurd, but saying we can't distinguish more than 30 fps is even more so.
yeah, the reason the images on TV and movies looks very smooth, is because the motion blur.
What motion blur does is give the impression of more intervening frames between the two actual frames. If you stop a movie during a high action scene with lots of movement, the scene that you will see will have a lot of blur, and any person or thing will be almost unrecognizable
When it is played at full 24 fps, things again look good and sharp. on games, thats not the case
Lol shows what you know, saying human eye cant see more than 30FPS. Go into any game and set your max FPS to 30fps, then to 60fps, youll definately notice a huge difference.
OK... JOSHUA - YOU ARE WRONG!!!! Completely and utterly wrong... If you believe that you can't tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps... then you need to go to the optometrist....
and to phazico7... I apologise about having to put joshua - the little dipshit in his place... but I figure it's better to stamp them out in public than to let them fester in society where they can hide...
hey i need help for gow in vista 32 bit hwn i click to play gow that seys please reinstal
lani941 2 years ago
Your lucky your direct x 10 works . just got my new gtx295 when directx 10 is enabled the video flickers like mad!
rashad546 2 years ago
yeah, this is the tune for 28 days later or 28 weeks later
TTsseeTT 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks good! Nice gameplay (Y)
Could you tell me how well do you think this game would run on my machine with dx9 or dx10 please? (i really need help)
Specs: Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16 ghz, 4 x 1GB 800Mhz DDR2, 512MB nVidia 8800GT, 500w PSU, gigabyte motherboard
higghigghigghigg07 3 years ago
help!!!! im new to computers i got 8800gt now wen i play games wat should resolution be i got a normal 17inch monitor
reamaun2 3 years ago
Isnt this the tune to 28 days later?
ayrtonaiko 3 years ago
it does but the whole black and gray make it warfare type and the post processing makes it like that. when u turn pp down to low it looks like the wall has rainbows on it
mda40000 3 years ago
it would be nice if gears of war had some color. everything looks brown and grey.
chevvok 3 years ago
thats wat war looks like lol
xXTheRealGmanXx 3 years ago
Is the Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Good?
jakanddaxterlover15 3 years ago
yeh
Kitelight08 3 years ago
Thnx :)
jakanddaxterlover15 3 years ago
can u Tell me WTF ! DirtX10 is !!!!!!
amartinez97 3 years ago
It's a DirectX version?
jakanddaxterlover15 3 years ago
its your mum's pussyhole
RicardoAstley 3 years ago
lol 28 weeks later ^^
ANBUrookie 3 years ago
Lol, I'm glad someone else noticed. ^^
Adamtron530 3 years ago
how u get directX 10?? ....
94antor 3 years ago
it comes with vista and u need a dx10 capable card, for gears. there is also a setting tht says anti aliasing and dx10 u hav to activate
lano09 3 years ago
who wants a 1 on 1 on xbox360 in gears of war??? (sniper)
bvbposa 3 years ago
i have almost exactly the same settup, only my 5600 is at 3.08 ghz...
qwertymac93 3 years ago
Direct X10 doesnt look liek it changed it much, it looks jsut like xbox
Bootyboy909 3 years ago
agreed
splintercell2013 3 years ago
there is a huge difference when your playing it. mostly just textures though.
qwertymac93 3 years ago
Phaaaa! Watch videos where showen differences between X9.0c and X10 and some of them say that there are almost no differences and other say that X9.0c is better!
pivenoka 3 years ago
vista or xp?
i have vista and get terrible performance, fps are fine, the stuttering is the problem
eka501 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this game lags a lot, horrible port to pc, i hate it
eka501 3 years ago
kid i agree wit satanreborn666 I get a 30-40fps constant ingame and I'm using Vista and 8600GT all medium
kyleaustin09 3 years ago
Put this on XP and get the XP patch for it and it will be much smoother. Vista makes games alot slower. (All games only working on vista can be made to work on XP with a patch. Takes a bit longer to get working but has better gameplay.)
Patriots4eva69 3 years ago
Vista plays games alot slower because of all the useles junk/processes running in the background. But if you disable them all, you will be able to run the games just as fast as in the XP version.
Diegog5 3 years ago
that's what I did, hold the windows button down and push R in vista, then go to startup and disable everything. Makes my computer run a lot faster.
getsbaked 3 years ago
28 WEEKS SONG!!
darkshiv 3 years ago
does dx10 cause lag, would u be less laggy or with more fps if u didnt have dx10 rather than have
tyler7878 3 years ago
the lag is probably from fraps and/or youtube
dhfhs2 3 years ago
what this song caled??
michal0202sob 3 years ago
and...?
MCSpidah 3 years ago
I heard this Sparkle 8800gt is very loud! Is that right?
detlev76 3 years ago
well first of all XP cant even run DX 10 and second DONT USE DX 10 IN THIS GAME UNLESS YOU WANT THE 4XAA. its just the same detail lvl as DX9 is and dont try using ntune's override for game applications to enhance the AA quality or AF. it doesnt work...
mda40000 3 years ago
What is this song called? heeelp
michal0202sob 3 years ago
how much frame rates do u get because im getting a system very similar to urs but i probably wont use Vista because its harder for me to use because im used to XP, my mom has vista and its very complicated for me.
deadly112 3 years ago
Bet your system cost a lot! Why do you need that much ram??
jonnyroxdrummer 3 years ago
Future.... 4GB RAM = 120€... cheap.
pHaZico7 3 years ago
cool, so you got two-2GB sticks?
jonnyroxdrummer 3 years ago
No, i've got 4x 1GB DDR2-800 CL4 RAM
pHaZico7 3 years ago
I've only got room for two slots so they would have to be 2x 2GB
jonnyroxdrummer 3 years ago
i've got 4 slots... :)
pHaZico7 3 years ago
lol, well nice to talk.
jonnyroxdrummer 3 years ago
It's from 28 weeks and 28 days later...Doesn't have a name to my knowledge
ratchetfan101 3 years ago
I love it lol
jonnyroxdrummer 3 years ago
What is this song called?
silver3452 3 years ago
this is off either the 28 days later or 28 weeks later soundtrack, glad i could help!!
carlmolito 3 years ago 2
it is. whats the song?
Steagan 3 years ago
DAMMIT NOW I DEFINITLY NEED VISTA
mda40000 3 years ago
dude he's in GeForce 8800GT...
Deigra619 3 years ago
what are you talking about... you need vista for DX10
superharry626 3 years ago
i mean DX10 is mostly ment for Vista and GeForce 8800GT and above
XP might even lag more with it...
Deigra619 3 years ago
damn i love this song!!!!!!!!! this is awsome !
matador470 3 years ago
Wow, this makes me feel a lot better about getting an 8800GT and not an X or S series.
soledge21 3 years ago
4 gb in vista... a waste if u dont use 64 bits...
cya
allankapo 4 years ago
No dude... Service Pack 1... 4GB on 32 bits (;
pHaZico7 3 years ago
not true, certain chipsets support use of 4gb of ram. but thanks for being a dick
carlmolito 3 years ago
ur OS has to support it as well, i have 4 gigs of ram but it reads that i only have 3.5gigs because of my 32 bit vista
dp100 3 years ago
Correction: That was supposed to be a reply to moaningmichaels post: "I wonder if theres going to be a point were games cant look any better!"
eirjep 4 years ago
is it just me, or is gears not a DX10 game? i could be wrong. (but dont think i am).
w0bbl3r 4 years ago
yes they look better. look at the new gears of war 2. it's coming.
marcusnns 4 years ago
I wonder if theres going to be a point were games cant look any better!
moaningmichael 4 years ago
crysis looks pretty good
GeneralFerretMan 4 years ago
naaa they will ALWAYS look better....
ALIENation51 4 years ago
when THEY look REALLY as REAL LIFE.
jackofblades94 4 years ago
REALLY do YOU THINK so?
beebogroll 4 years ago
NO iM NOT!
jackofblades94 4 years ago
There will be a point where games cant look any more realistic. But realistic and beautiful is not the same thing.
They could always add effects that you cant see IRL. So if you mean by how nice it looks, then the answer is no. Realistic is another thing...
eirjep 4 years ago
they are getting closer to extreme hyper-realism, crysis and call of duty 4 are great examples of this, the next step up would be a virtual game with the same graphics as crysis or CoD 4, then they will be realistic and beautiful, but games will always keep looking better.
ricochet36 3 years ago
COD 4 graphics look good only at a distance but look like mushed shit up close, disappointingly really
ematix007 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SHIT GAME
COD4 FTW!!!
Death1701 4 years ago
yes...
jackofblades94 4 years ago
this tune really went well in 28 weeks later.. sorta does match in with dis vid too... good job.. gettin my AMD 6000+ soon yay!!!!
DJhedgehammer 4 years ago 3
28 weeks later soundtrack,cool
TerribleTurk 4 years ago 4
how do i get directx 10? please pm me
XxXRicky172XxX 4 years ago
U mast buy a VideoCard with 4.0 Shayders!
Manhunter13 4 years ago
And have Windows Vista.
nmbmtl 4 years ago
Exactly. Unlike Manhunter13's half-assed response, you dont just need a Video Card with 4.0 "shayders"...or SHADERS as its actually spelt, but you also need Vista, XP doesnt support DX10 (any DX10-ready card will still work in XP (8800 cards, etc) but they will only run on DX9)
unriselyrical 4 years ago
I run company of heroes in directx 10 on xp. it came with a patch cd. is there a patch or anything for gears too?
jckbac9 4 years ago
You have to have Vista? Even if you have a card that is directx 10 with 4.0 shaders???
jckbac9 4 years ago
Yes.
nmbmtl 4 years ago
ok. thanks. but just to clarify, since i dont have vista i cant run gears in directx 10, but microsoft could have made a patch, like the one made for company of heroes? so they could have made it possible, but didnt.
jckbac9 4 years ago
Windows XP and DX10 arnt capatible, it has to do with XPs coding, they would need to re-write like half the OS to make DX10 fully work in it, and that would be useless. So no, technically they cant make a "DX10 patch" for XP. Vista only. Not only that, DX10 is Vistas selling point, they wont get rid of that.
Otacrunk 4 years ago
Yes they can, microsoft made both systems, but there money hogging bastards and will never do so, because they want people to pay hundreds of pounds or dollars for vista.
moaningmichael 4 years ago
Intel is better usually than AMD like dual-core, or quad-core. But That still is a nice processer.
playerbnny 4 years ago
song: In the house in a heartbeat, 28 days later soundtrack.
woolo 4 years ago
thank you
DJhedgehammer 4 years ago
lol listening to that song on my ipod in the middle of night when im almost asleep is creepy as fuck
gargle888000 4 years ago
El gear of war de PC es superior a la xbox 360?????
AlfreRock69 4 years ago
The PC version has more content.
FriendlySniper 4 years ago
But in graphic is superior?
AlfreRock69 4 years ago
if u have a good GPU, it can get better resolution on PC
starmaster007 4 years ago 3
Or just visit your channel. Quit spamming peoples vids.
joshua12345676 4 years ago
the game is FPS locked at 60FPS
reno582 4 years ago
are you running vista 64-bit?
linwoodskivins 4 years ago
LOL thats what i was thinking, acually when he was running across the field. anyway this game is SICKKK
carefuleugene12 4 years ago
Yah, that's all I picture when I hear this lol. Him hauling ass across the field as the zombies start chasing him.
lessQQmorepewpeww 4 years ago
makes me think of 28 days later
skatefarmerftw 4 years ago
LOL me too i was tryin to think of where this song came from then i saw ur post thank LOL
channdizzle 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If somebody want,
link to this grat sound:
h t t p : / / w w w.speedyshare. c o m/564326159. h t m l
Lehef 4 years ago
"In the House - In a Heartbeat" is an instrumental track by British composer John Murphy. It is most famous for its association with the 2002 film 28 Days Later!
gr33tz
pHaZico7 4 years ago
what song is this????
wander666 4 years ago
It's from the movie 28 days later. Check out the soundtrack.
FriendlySniper 4 years ago 2
you must tell me the name of the song please.
WFALEX 4 years ago
What song is this?
deftonesa165 4 years ago
You know you can active reload, right?
slickchris7777 4 years ago
sweet man!
reonancethedj 4 years ago
I love 28 days later
spunkx100 4 years ago 2
mee too! nice movie!
ExtraTerrestrials 4 years ago
oh shit sparkle made an 8800gt dint no that
X831HUSTLER 4 years ago
At that framerate looks like about 1680x1050, i could be wrong
Samage89 4 years ago
I've recorded 30 frames per second with Fraps on 1280x1024. (:
pHaZico7 4 years ago
You have to remember that fraps brings it down alot
linwoodskivins 4 years ago
yeah but considering the system he has he shud be able to get more out of it...i blame vista 30fps on a system like that? very pitiful
Dalongjohnn2006 4 years ago
You idiot. FRAPS slows down your frame rate to whatever it's recording at. He may get 500 fps in a game, but if he kicks on FRAPS it will slow it down to 30 to record.
locust76 4 years ago 2
well considering i also use frapps and i can get 60 then he must have the settings wrong check my F.E.A.R video if u dont believe me but ah well cant plz every1
Dalongjohnn2006 4 years ago
Yeah, recording Fraps videos at 60 frames per second... that's not stupid.
locust76 4 years ago
the smoother the better mate
Dalongjohnn2006 4 years ago
i htink people make the mistake of forgetting to record the video in youtube resolution which is smaller and easier to record without lagging the computer if its shit
girlsdrinkfeck 4 years ago
Human Eye wont notice anything more than 30FPS anyways, so whats the matter? Smoother the bigger the file*^..
joshua12345676 4 years ago
Actually no - the human eye usually wont notice anything more than about 60fps... believe me - if you had a game at 30fps and 60fps - I could tell the difference easily.
reaperman2004 4 years ago
Then i guess you should know that your television plays at around 30 FPS then. Wont notice any higher
joshua12345676 4 years ago
Actually in Australia its only 25fps... but in games... there's a difference... if you can't tell - then I'd get a better monitor.
reaperman2004 4 years ago
Yea thats it, my $20 monitor. (rolls eyes)
joshua12345676 4 years ago
Well no wonder you can't see the difference... I'd spend a little more money on a good monitor... that'll solve the problem.
But seriously... the human eye can distinguish between 30fps and 60 very easily - ask most gamers or anyone who works in television.
reaperman2004 4 years ago
You can't compare television and video games directly in fps,(rendered differently and displayed differently.) There have been tests that show air force pilots could distinguish a plane silhouette shown only for 1/220th of a second, but the human eye doesn't see in FPS to begin with, it sees in constant fluid motion; so labeling human vision in FPS is absurd, but saying we can't distinguish more than 30 fps is even more so.
setsailforfail 4 years ago
He was being sarcastic HAHAHAH
PayneXtreme 4 years ago
yeah, the reason the images on TV and movies looks very smooth, is because the motion blur.
What motion blur does is give the impression of more intervening frames between the two actual frames. If you stop a movie during a high action scene with lots of movement, the scene that you will see will have a lot of blur, and any person or thing will be almost unrecognizable
When it is played at full 24 fps, things again look good and sharp. on games, thats not the case
download26 4 years ago
WRONG, sorry sir
joshua12345676 4 years ago
WRONG, sorry sir
joshua12345676 4 years ago
Lol shows what you know, saying human eye cant see more than 30FPS. Go into any game and set your max FPS to 30fps, then to 60fps, youll definately notice a huge difference.
beebogroll 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lol show you have no life, going and reading old comments. FAIL, WRONG, SIR
joshua12345676 4 years ago
OH FOR CHRIST SAKE JOSHUA - THE HUMAN EYE CAN DETERMINE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 30FPS... and 60FPS...
Accept it... you are WRONG!!!! And if you still think your right then go to the bloody doctor to get your eyes checked.
Jesus Christ - You ARE an idiot.
ACCEPT IT - YOU ARE WRONG... Now bugger OFF.
IDIOT!!!!
reaperman2004 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
M8t i have 15/15 vision thats not the problem, its YOU! You're so terribly mistakingly wrong its not even funny!! GTFO
joshua12345676 4 years ago
OK... JOSHUA - YOU ARE WRONG!!!! Completely and utterly wrong... If you believe that you can't tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps... then you need to go to the optometrist....
ACCEPT THAT YOU ARE WRONG... Now BUGGER OFF!!!!
I swear - you act like a god damn child...
IDIOT!!!!!!
reaperman2004 4 years ago 3
And by the way you jackarse... if you had perfect vision... then you would have 20/20 vision...
It's not like mathematical fractions where 2/2 is the same as 5/5 or 20/20..... or 15/15
DIPSHIT!!!!
reaperman2004 4 years ago 2
and to phazico7... I apologise about having to put joshua - the little dipshit in his place... but I figure it's better to stamp them out in public than to let them fester in society where they can hide...
and procreate.
reaperman2004 4 years ago 2
yep joshua is retarded
Markx12F 4 years ago 2
at wut rez wer ya playin it
xxARYANxx 4 years ago
uhhhhh......average/min/max fps???
kevin62492 4 years ago